The
Brazilian
Journal
of
INFECTIOUS
DISEASES
w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b j i d
Original
article
Presence
of
highly
oncogenic
human
papillomavirus
in
the
oral
mucosa
of
asymptomatic
men
Ana
Paula
Machado
a,
Flávia
Gatto
de
Almeida
a,
Camila
Mareti
Bonin
a,
Thiago
Theodoro
Martins
Prata
a,
Leandro
Sobrinho
Ávilla
b,
Cacilda
Tezelli
Junqueira
Padovani
b,
Alda
Maria
Teixeira
Ferreira
b,
Carlos
Eurico
dos
Santos
Fernandes
b,
Inês
Aparecida
Tozetti
a,c,∗aPostgraduateProgramofInfectiousandParasitaryDiseasesfromMedicineSchool,UniversidadeFederaldeMatoGrossodoSul/UFMS,
CidadeUniversitária,CampoGrande,MatoGrossodoSul,Brazil
bBiologicalandHealthCenterfromUniversidadeFederaldeMatoGrossodoSulCidadeUniversitária,CampoGrande,
MatoGrossodoSul,Brazil
cMedicineSchoolfromUniversidadeFederaldeMatoGrossodoSul/UFMS,CidadeUniversitária,CampoGrande,MatoGrossodoSul,
Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received29April2013
Accepted24July2013
Availableonline3January2014
Keywords: Humanpapilomavírus Men Viraltype Oralmucosal
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Objectives:Theaimofthisstudywastoidentifyhighlyoncogenicformsofhuman
papillo-mavirusintheoralmucosaofasymptomaticmen.
Methods:Inthisstudy,weanalyzedsamplesofexfoliatedcellsfromtheoralcavityof559
asymptomaticmen.DNA-humanpapillomaviruswasdetectedusingtheconsensusprimers
PGMY09/11;viralgenotypingwasperformedusingtype-specificPCRandrestriction
frag-mentlengthpolymorphism.
Results:DNA-humanpapillomaviruswasdetectedin1.3%ofthestudyparticipantsandof
those42.8%wereinfectedbymorethanonetypeofvirus.ViraltypesincludedHPV6,11,89
(lowoncogenicrisk),andHPV52,53(highoncogenicrisk).Increasedvulnerabilitytohuman
papillomavirusinfectionwasobservedinindividualsagedover26years,amongthosewho
reportedoralsexpractices,andinthosewhohavehadmorethan16sexualpartnerssince
firstengaginginsexualintercourse.
Conclusions:Therewasalowprevalenceofhumanpapillomavirusdetectionintheoral
mucosaofasymptomaticmen.Highlyoncogenichumanpapillomavirustypesandinfection
bymorethanoneviraltypewasobserved.Oralsexpracticesandalargenumberofsexual
partnersmayincreasetheriskofacquiringhumanpapillomavirusinfection.
©2014PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.
∗ Correspondingauthorat:FaculdadedeMedicina,UFMS,CampoGrande,Brazil.
E-mailaddress:inestozetti1408@hotmail.com(I.A.Tozetti).
1413-8670/$–seefrontmatter©2014PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.
Introduction
Thehumanpapillomavirus(HPV)isaprimaryriskfactorfor
cervicalneoplasiaandisassociatedwith25%ofcancers
affect-ingtheheadandneckregion,1andmayinducedevelopment
oforopharynxcarcinoma.2
TherearetwoformsofHPV,includinghighoncogenicrisk
(HR)and low oncogenicrisk (LR)types. Low-risk typesare
associatedwithbenignlesionsinthehostcharacterizedas
ordinaryor condylomatouswartsandincludeHPV6,11,40,
42,43,44,54,61,70,72,and81.High-risktypeshave
carcino-genicpotentialandincludeHPV16,18,26,31,33,35,39,45,
51,52,53,56,59,66,68,72,and81.3
Themoreanindividualengagesinriskybehaviorssuchas
oralsexandhashighnumberofsexualpartners,thegreater
theriskofacquiringthevirus,withsubsequentdevelopment
of cellular differentiation and progression to neoplasia.4,5
However, some individuals develop oropharynx carcinoma
withoutpriorexposuretotheseriskfactors,suggestingthat
potentiallyoncogenicvirusesmayleadtochangesincontrol
andcellproliferationmechanisms.6
Previousstudies have examined the prevalence of HPV
in the oral mucosa of asymptomatic men and suggested
its association with neoplastic development; however, the
assessmentmethods have shown disparate frequencies of
infection,rangingfrom 0%to100%.7 Thus, theaimofthis
studywastoassessthefrequencyofhighlyoncogenicforms
ofHPVintheoralmucosaofasymptomaticmen.
Methods
and
subjects
Exfoliated cells from the oral cavity of 559 asymptomatic
men were analyzed. Ethical approval was granted by the
Ethics Committee in Research of UFMS, protocol CAAE
0251.0.049.000-11.Allparticipantscompletedaquestionnaire
containinginformationregardingriskbehaviorsthatmay
pre-disposethemtoHPVinfection.
CollectionofspecimensanddetectionofHPV-DNA
Samples were collected through 5–10brushings inregions
of pre-establishedoral mucosa, including the right buccal
mucosa (positionfrom top to bottom); left buccal mucosa
(positionfromtop tobottom);right, leftand dorsal sideof
thetongue;andinnerregionsofupperandlowerlips.After
collection, DNA wasextracted from the samplesusing the
WizardGenomicDNAPurificationkit(Promega,Fitchburg,WI,
USA)and quantified using a NanoDrop (ThermoScientific,
Waltham,MA,USA)(180–260nm).
HPV-DNA detection was performed using PCR with a
pool ofconsensus primers that amplify PGMY09/11 450-bp
DNA sequences within the L1 region ofHPV, as described
previously.8AnendogenouscontrolwasusedtoverifyDNA
integrityusingprimersfortheˇ-globingene,PC04andGH20,
whichamplifya286-bpregionofhumanDNA.Negative
con-trolsforbackgroundcontaminationwereaddedtotheDNA
template.PCRproductswereanalyzedusing1.5%agarosegel
electrophoresiswithethidiumbromidestainingtovisualize
theDNAunderultraviolet(UV)light.Molecularweightswere
determinedbycomparisonwitha100-bpDNAladder.
Genotypingusingtype-specificPCR(TS-PCR)and restrictionfragmentlengthpolymorphism(RFLP)
HPV-DNApositivesamplesweregenotypedbyPCRusing
TS-PCRfortheE6andE7geneDNAsequencesofHPV6,11,16,18,
31,33,and45.9PCRproductswereanalyzedona2.5%agarose
gelwithethidiumbromidestainingtovisualizeDNAunderUV
light.Molecularweightsweredeterminedbycomparisonwith
100-bpand50-bpDNAladders.Thesamesampleswere
ana-lyzedusingRFLP.Next,thePGMY09/11PCRproductofthese
sampleswaspurifiedfromtheagarosegelusingtheQIAEX
IIGelPurificationKitQiagen(Hilden,Germany)accordingto
themanufacturer’sprotocol.Theconcentrationofextracted
materialswas determined using a NanoDrop(180–260nm);
samplescontainingthePCRproductweresubjectedto
enzy-maticdigestionforonehourat37◦C.Theenzymesusedfor
reaction included BamHI, DdeI, HaeIII, HinfI, RsaI, PstI, and
Sau3A.Thedigestionpatternwasanalyzedona3%agarosegel
withethidiumbromideunderUVlightandinterpretedusing
analgorithmdescribedpreviously.10
Statisticalanalysis
ThedistributionofpositivityforHPV-DNAwasinvestigated
according to age range (≤25 years and ≥26 years), marital
status, report oforal sexpractices, and estimated number
ofsexualpartners.Statisticalanalysiswasperformedusing
SPSS,version10.011ofPearson2testforcontingencytables,
adjustedforPhiCramer’sV.Tocomparefrequenciesbetween
agesubgroups,whensignificant,theGtestcorrectedbyYates
indexwasused.Theproportionofpositivefindingswithinthe
groupwasanalyzedusingthebinomialtestfortwo
indepen-dentsamples.
Results
Samplesofasymptomaticoralmucosafrommenaged18–68
years(mean,23years)wasanalyzed.Ofthe559samples
col-lected, 514(91.9%)were positiveforthe ˇ-globin gene and
thusincludedinthestudy.HPV-DNAwasdetectedinseven
samples,whichaccountedfor1.3%ofthestudyparticipants.
DetectedviraltypesincludedHPV6,11,and89intheLR
groupandHPV52and53intheHRgroup(Figs.1and2).Highly
oncogenicinfectionwasdetectedintwooutoftheseven
sam-ples(28.5%),andinfectionbymorethanoneviraltypewas
foundinthreeofthesevensamples(42.8%).
Amongtheparticipants,71.7%reportedbeingsingleand
27.2%married,withahigherHPV-DNApositivityamong
mar-ried men.Thebinomial test showedthat individuals older
than 26 years of age were more vulnerable to infection
(p<0.01). Oral sexpractices were reported by 71.9% of the
respondents(Table1),particularlyamongthoseover26years
ofage(p<0.01),whereHPV-DNApositivitywashigher.
Amongindividualswhoreportedhavinghadmorethan16
sexualpartnerssincetheirfirstsexualintercourse,HPV-DNA
Table1–EpidemiologicalcharacteristicsofthepopulationassociatedwithpositivityforHPV-DNA.
Variable Total HPV(+) HPV(−) p-Valuea
N◦ % N◦ % N◦ % Age 0.08 ≤25 397 77.2 3 0.75b 394 99.25 ≥26 108 21.0 3 2.7b 105 97.3 Missing 9 1.8 1 11.0 8 89.0 Maritalstatus 0.73 Nevermarried 367 71.4 4 1.0 362 99.9 Married 140 27.2 3 2.1 137 97.9 Missing 5 1.4 0 0.0 5 100.0 Oralsex 0.5 No 131 25.4 1 0.7 130 99.3 Yes 370 71.9 5 1.3 365 98.7 Missing 13 2.7 1 7.6 12 92.4
Sexualpartnerssincetheirfirstsexualintercourse 0.09
1–5 119 23.1 1 0.8 118 99.2 6–15 164 31.9 1 0.6* 163 99.4 16–25 56 10.9 1 1.8 55 98.2 >26 90 17.5 3 3.3* 87 96.7 Missing 85 16.6 1 1.1 84 98.9 HPV,humanpapillomavirus.
a Pearson2test,adjustedforPhiCramer’sV. b Binomialtestfor2independentsamples(p<0.05).
Discussion
InthisstudyHPVwasdetectedin1.3%oftheparticipants.A
cohortstudyconductedintheUSfrom2000to2006assessing
thepresenceofHPVinoralmucosafoundanHPVfrequency
of6.0%inoralbrushingandoropharyngealscrapings.12Other
multicenterstudiesconductedtoexaminemalesubjectsin
Brazil,theUS,andMexicofoundapositivityof2.1%,3.6%,and
5.9%,respectively,inmaterialfromgargling.13
Previousstudies haveshownthattherateofHPV
infec-tionishighinmalesubjects,14rangingfrom3.5%to45%for
*100pb Pst I Hae III Dde I Rsa I Controla *50pb
500p
250p
Fig.1–Electrophoresisinagarose3%showingpatternsof polymorphismoftherestrictionfragmentsobtainedwith theproductofPGMY09/11usedforgenotypingofthe HPV52(HR).*100pband50pb=ladderDNA;acontrol: PGMY09/11PCRproductof450pbwithoutenzymatic digestion.Restrictionenzyme:PstI=notdigestion;Hae III ∼= 200pb;DdeI ∼= 350pb;RsaI=notdigestion.
alldetectabletypes.15However,otherstudiesshowdifferent
values,withhigherandmoredivergentprevalence.16These
results may reflect methodological discrepancies used for
HPV-DNAdetection,thereproducibilityofgenotypingassays,
andthesensitivityandspecificityofprimersusedfor
diagno-sis.
TheglobaldistributionofdifferentHPVtypesexhibitslarge
variation,evenfortheoralcavityofsubjectsindifferent
geo-graphicalregions.StudiesexaminingHPVprevalenceintheUS
conductedin2009–2010showedthatamongHRtypesinthe
oralmucosa,theHPVgenotypes16,66,and51wereprevalent,
*100pb Pst I Hae III Dde I Rsa I Controla *50pb
250p 500p
Fig.2–Electrophoresisinagarose3%showingpatternsof polymorphismoftherestrictionfragmentsobtainedwith theproductofPGMY09/11usedforgenotypingofthe HPV89(LR).*100pband50pb=ladderDNA;acontrol: PGMY09/11PCRproductof450pbwithoutenzymatic digestion.Restrictionenzyme:PstI=notdigestion;Hae III ∼= 350pb;DdeI ∼= 250pb;RsaI ∼= 380pb.
and among LR types, 62, 55, and 89 were predominant,5
in contrast to the findings of this study. Other authors
demonstrated thatHPV types6, 11,and 16 were the most
prevalent.16
Theoralmucosaofhealthyindividualscanhost
approx-imately 4.4% of carcinogenic types and 7.5% of
non-carcinogenic types of HPV.7 The difference between HPV
typesdetectedintheoralcavityandcervical–vaginalregion
showsabroaderviewofdistributionfordifferenttissuetypes.
Thus,theseregionscanbecolonizedbytypesnotpreviously
detected,whichmayexplaineventssuchasthelackofcell
cyclecontrolinthesetissues.
Inmen,theprevalenceofinfectionisnotrelatedtoage,nor
istheprevalencehigherinyoungerindividuals,incontrastto
trendsobservedinwomen.Thesefindingssuggestthatmen
mayexperiencepersistentlong-terminfectionwithahighrate
ofre-infection.OtherstudieshaverevealedthatHPVpositivity
increaseswithage.5,13,17
Thepresentstudyobservedhigherpositivityamong
indi-viduals aged more than 26 years; however, this may be
associatedwiththeadoptionofriskysexualbehaviorbythis
agegroup.
Oralsexpracticeshavebeenwidelyassociatedwiththerisk
ofHPVinfection,althoughitisimpossibletoidentifyan
inde-pendentfactorresponsibleforinfection.1,18Ourstudyshowed
that oral sex practices were prevalent in 71.9% of
partici-pants.AstudyconductedinMexicoexaminedtheincidence
ofHPVintheoralmucosaofwomenwithcervicallesionswho
reportedoralsexpracticesandalsoshowed72%positivityfor
HPV.19
Despite the hypothesis that HPV is transmitted to a
particular region through oral sex practices, there is no
consensusforcollectingparticipants’secondarydata.Thus,
studies minimizing sample failures, such as the effect of
mouth kissing, which is associated with infection among
those who reported no oral sex practices, should be
examined.12
The number of sexual partners may be a marker of
other risk factors.20 Previous studies have analyzed the
correlation between HPV infection in couples and in men
with a large number of sexual partners.18,21 The present
study showed a higher positivity of HPV among
individ-ualswithalargernumberofsexualpartners;however,this
observation should not be considered in isolation since a
combinationofpracticespredisposing toinfectionmust be
considered.
In conclusion, the three primary findings of this study
includealowprevalenceofHPVinfectionintheoralmucosa
ofasymptomaticmen,theabilityofthemouthmucosatohost
high-riskHPVtypes,andthepresenceofmultipleviraltypes
withoutalwayspresentingwithclinicallesions.
Riskysexualbehaviorssuchasoralsexandhavingalarge
numberofsexualpartnersmayberelatedtoindividual
pre-dispositiontoHPVinfection,makingthemmorevulnerableto
HPVinfection.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
Acknowledgements
Thisstudy wassupportedbyFoundationtoSupport
Devel-opmentofEducation,ScienceandTechnologyoftheStateof
MatoGrossodoSul,Brazil(Fundect-MS), NationalResearch
Council(CNPq),andCoordinationofImprovementofHigher
Level(CAPES).
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.D’SouzaG,KreimerAR,ViscidiR,etal.Case–controlstudyof humanpapillomavirusandoropharyngealcancer.NEnglJ Med.2007;356:1944–56.
2.GillisonML,KochWM,CaponeRB,etal.Evidenceforacausal associationbetweenhumanpapillomavirusandasubsetof headandneckcancers.JNatlCancerInst.2000;92:709–20.
3.IARC(InternationalAgencyforResearchonCancer). Monographsontheevaluationofcarcinogenicrisksto humans:humanpapillomaviruses.France:Lyon;2007.
4.RaginC,EdwardsR,Larkin-PettigrewM,etal.OralHPV infectionandsexuality:across-sectionalstudyinwomen.Int JMolSci.2011;12:3928–40.
5.GillisonML,BroutianT,PickardRK,etal.Prevalenceoforal HPVinfectionintheUnitedStates,2009–2010.JAMA. 2012;307:693–703.
6.BaganJV,ScullyC.RecentadvancesinOralOncology2007: epidemiology,aetiopathogenesis,diagnosisand
prognostication.OralOncol.2008;44:103–8.
7.KreimerAR,BhatiaRK,MesseguerAL,etal.Oralhuman papillomavirusinhealthyindividuals:asystematicreviewof theliterature.SexTransmDis.2010;37:386–91.
8.GravittPE,PeytonCI,AlessiTQ,etal.Improvedamplification ofgenitalhumanpapillomaviruses.JClinMicrobiol. 2000;38:357–61.
9.GuoM,SneigeN,SilvaEG,etal.Distributionandviralloadof eightoncogenictypesofhumanpapillomavirus(HPV)and HPV16integrationstatusincervicalintraepithelialneoplasia andcarcinoma.ModPathol.2007;20:256–66.
10.NobreRJ,AlmeidaLP,MartinsTC.Completegenotypingof mucosalhumanpapillomavirususingarestrictionfragment lengthpolymorphismanalysisandanoriginaltyping algorithm.JClinVirol.2008;42:13–21.
11.NorusisMJ.SPSS10.0guidetodataanalyses.UpperSaddle River,NJ:Prentice-Hall;2000.
12.D’SouzaG,AgrawalY,HalpernJ,etal.Oralsexualbehaviors associatedwithprevalentoralhumanpapillomavirus infection.JInfectDis.2009;199:1263–9.
13.KreimerAR,VillaA,NyitrayAG,etal.Theepidemiologyof oralHPVinfectionamongamultinationalsampleofhealthy men.CancerEpidemiolBiomarkersPrev.2011;20:172–82.
14.KreimerAR,AlbergAJ,DanielR,etal.Oralhuman
papillomavirusinfectioninadultsisassociatedwithsexual behaviorandHIVserostatus.JInfectDis.2004;189:686–98.
15.PartridgeJM,KoutskyLA.Genitalhumanpapillomavirus infectioninmen.LancetInfectDis.2006;6:21–31.
16.KristoffersenAK,EnersenM,KverndokkE,etal.Human papillomavirussubtypesinorallesionscomparedtohealthy oralmucosa.JClinVirol.2012;53:364–6.
17.GichkiAS,BuajeebW,DoungudomdachaS,etal.Detectionof humanpapillomavirusinnormaloralcavityinagroupof Pakistanisubjectsusingreal-timePCR.AsianPacJCancer Prev.2012;13:2299–304.
18.WiddiceLE,BrelandDJ,JonteJ,etal.Humanpapillomavirus concordanceinheterosexualcouples.JAdolescHealth. 2010;47:151–9.
19.Sánchez-VargasL,Díaz-HernandezC,Martinez-MartinezA. Detectionofhumanpapillomavirus(HPV)inoralmucosaof womenwithcervicallesionsandtheirrelationtooralsex practices.InfectAgentCancer.2010;5:25.
20.GravittPE.TheknownunknownsofHPVnaturalhistory.J ClinInvest.2011;121:4593–9.
21.TermineN,GiovannelliL,MatrangaD,etal.Lowrateoforal humanpapillomavirus(HPV)infectioninwomenscreened forcervicalHPVinfectioninSouthernItaly:across-sectional studyof140immunocompetentsubjects.JMedVirol. 2009;81:1438–43.