• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Bautista-Gómezb, Raúl Fajardo Mu ˜noza, Israel Quijano Hernándezc

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Share "Bautista-Gómezb, Raúl Fajardo Mu ˜noza, Israel Quijano Hernándezc"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto

(1)

h tt p : / / w w w . b j m i c r o b i o l . c o m . b r /

Veterinary

Microbiology

Identification

of

co-infection

by

rotavirus

and

parvovirus

in

dogs

with

gastroenteritis

in

Mexico

Ariadna

Flores

Ortega

a

,

José

Simón

Martínez-Casta ˜neda

a,∗

,

Linda

G.

Bautista-Gómez

b

,

Raúl

Fajardo

Mu ˜noz

a

,

Israel

Quijano

Hernández

c

aCentrodeInvestigaciónyEstudiosAvanzadosenSaludAnimal,FacultaddeMedicinaVeterinariayZootecnia,UniversidadAutónoma

delEstadodeMéxico,Toluca,EstadodeMéxico,México

bCentroUniversitarioAmecameca,UniversidadAutónomadelEstadodeMéxico,AmecamecadeJuárez,México

cHospitalVeterinariodePeque ˜nasEspecies,FacultaddeMedicinaVeterinariayZootecnia,UniversidadAutónomadelEstadodeMéxico,

Toluca,EstadodeMéxico,México

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received26October2016

Accepted7March2017

Availableonline24June2017

AssociateEditor:MilianeSouza

Keywords:

Dog Mexico Parvovirus Rotavirus

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

ThisisthefirstreportoncirculatingcaninerotavirusinMexico.Fiftysamplesfromdogswith gastroenteritiswereanalyzedusedpolymerasechainreactionandreversetranscription polymerasechainreactioninordertoidentifyparvovirusandrotavirus,respectively;7%of dogswereinfectedwithrotavirusexclusively,while14%wereco-infectedwithbothrotavirus andparvovirus;clinicalsignsinco-infecteddogsweremoresevere.

©2017SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisis anopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/

licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Infectiousgastroenteritisareoneofthemaincausesofdog

hospitalization,etiologicalagentsidentificationisachallenge forveterinarians,giventhatgastroenteritisetiologyiscaused

by diverse pathogenic agents, mainly co-infections among

virusorbacteria.1–3

Canineparvovirus(CPV-2)isamemberoftheParvoviridae

family,belongingtotheProtoparvovirusgenusandCarnivore

Protoparvovirustype1species.Diversereportsindicatethatis themostdiagnosedviralagentingastroenteritis.4,5Overthe

pastyears,CPV-2hasdevelopednewantigenicvariants.In

Correspondingauthorat:CentrodeInvestigaciónyEstudiosAvanzadosenSaludAnimal,FacultaddeMedicinaVeterinariayZootecnia, UniversidadAutónomadelEstadodeMéxico,CarreteradeCuotaToluca-Atlacomulco,Kilómetro15.5,CódigoPostal50200,Toluca,Estado deMéxico,Mexico.

E-mail:jsmartinezc@uaemex.mx(J.S.Martínez-Casta ˜neda).

1980CPV-2originalstrain wasreplacedbythevariant

des-ignatedtype2a(CPV-2a),in1984wasidentifiedCPV-2band

in2001,CPV-2cwasdetectedandreportedinItaly.Itis

pos-sible that CPV-2c isthe predominantvariant in numerous

countries.6

Currently,thereissomecontroversyoverclinical character-isticsofdiseaseassociatedwiththesethreevariants;however, someauthorssuggesttherearenoneclinicaldifferences.7

Clinical signs of canine parvovirosis include fever,

anorexia, lethargy, depression, vomiting, mucoid to

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.03.008

(2)

770

brazilian journal of microbiology48(2017)769–773

1

A

B

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

Fig.1–(A)Parvovirusamplicons.Thepictureshowsa2.0%agarosegelcontainingPCRproducts(275bp)fromdifferent samples.Lane1:DNAlengthmarker(generuler100–1000bpDNALadderplus,Fermentas);lanes2,4and8:CPV-positive samples.Lanes6and10:CPV-negativesamples.(B)Rotavirusamplicons(379bp).Lane1:DNAlengthmarker(generuler 100–1000bpDNALadderplus,Fermentas);lanes3,6,7and9:CRV-positivesamples;lanes2,4,5,8and10:CRV-negative samples.

hemorrhagic diarrhea and sometimes leukopenia;

how-ever, some reports show parvovirus in dogs with atypical

clinicalsigns,andtheauthorssuggestthatthisislikelydue

toCPV-2evolution.8Ontheotherhand,thediseasecanvary

depending on the patient; actually,CPV-2c can infect both

pupsandadults.9

Afurtherfactorimplicatedinvariabilityofclinicalprofiles

inparvovirusisassociationwithothergastroentericviruses

such as canine distemper, canine coronavirus and canine

rotavirus.

Actually,rotavirusesareclassifiedasdistinctmembersof thefamilyreoviridae,genusrotavirus,comprisingfivespecies (AtoE)andtwotentativespecies(FandG).Caninerotavirusis

adouble-strandedRNA,non-envelopedvirusthatpossesses

asegmentedgenomeandthatisapproximately60–75nmin

diameter;fewisolatesofrotavirushavebeenreportedindogs,

thesehavebeenclassifiedasserotypesG3andP5A,grouped

intogroupA,rotavirusofthisgroupcauseneonataldiarrhea

inhumanandmanyanimalspecies;ithasbeendemonstrated

thatdirectinterspecies transmissionbetweenheterologous

strains are key mechanisms ingenerating rotavirusstrain

diversityinnewhosts.Humaninfectionforrotavirusofcanine originhasbeenreported.10,11

Clinical signs ofthe disease includemoderate enteritis,

mainlyinpupsyoungerthantwoweeksold,12,13anditalso

causeslethargy,anorexia,fever,diarrheaandvomiting.

Gen-erally,patientsrecoverwithintwoweeks;however,thereare

reportsoffatalsevereenteritisindogsundertwoweeksold.14

The presence of antibodies against rotavirus has been

demonstrated in a high percentage of adult dogs (80%).15

Rotavirus infection does not have pathognomonic clinical

signsandmostdogscanbeasymptomatictoinfectionand

occasionallysignscanbeconfusedwithparvovirus,therefore, laboratorytestfordifferentialdiagnosesarenecessary.3,13In

Mexico,itremainsunknownwhetherrotavirusiscirculating

amongstcaninepopulationsandifitplaysaprimaryroleas

etiologicagentingastroenteritis.

From March through June 2015, we conducted

non-probability sampling in dogs attending the small animal

veterinaryhospitaloftheAutonomousUniversityoftheState

ofMexico(UAEM,byitsacronyminSpanish).Fiftydogsof

dif-ferentages,breeds,non-vaccinateddogswithgastroenteritis

signswereselected.Onerectalswabwastakenfromeachdog

tobeusedinPCRtesting(parvovirusidentification),whilea

secondswabwastakenforRT-PCRtesting(rotavirus

identifi-cation).Swabswerestoredat−80◦Cuntilprocessing.

TheRotateqvaccine(Merck,USA),whichcontainsrotavirus

serotypesG1P[8],G2P[4],G3P[8]andG9P[8],wasusedas posi-tivecontrol,andinthecaseofparvovirustheEdo.Mex1isolate

wasused(previouslyidentifiedinourlaboratoryandwhich

correspondstoCPV2-cgenotype).

InordertoextractRNAfromrotavirus,eachswabwas

sus-pendedin200␮LofDiethylpyrocarbonate(DEPC1%)-treated

water and centrifuged 7min at 5000×g. Supernatant was

processedusingtheGeneJETViralDNAandRNAPurification

kit(Thermoscientific,USA),followingmanufacturer’s instruc-tions.

Rectalswabsusedforparvovirusdetectionweresuspended

in500␮Lofsterilewater,centrifuged1minat5000×g.200␮L

ofsupernatantwasprocessedforDNAextractionusingthe

QIAampDNAMiniKit(Qiagen,USA)followingthe

manufac-turer’sinstructions.

Inthecaseofrotavirus,two-stepRT-PCRwasperformed

foreachofthesamples,usingtheImProm-IITMReverse

Tran-scriptionSystemkit(Promega,USA).Inthefirststep,cDNA

synthesis was accomplished.3␮LofRNA ofeach

purifica-tionplus2␮L(0.5␮g/reaction)ofprimerdTwasusedineach reaction.Allreactionswereincubatedat70◦Cfor15minand

subsequently at 4◦C for 5min. Next, 1␮L of ImProm-IITM

(3)

Fig.2–(A)The250nucleotidessequencedfromtheamplifiedfragmentsofcaninerotavirussamples;sequencesobtained werecomparedwithsequencesreportedinGenBank:GU565078.1,JX866792.1,andEU708927.1.(B)The250nucleotides sequencedfromtheamplifiedfragmentsofcanineparvovirussamples;sequencesobtainedwerecomparedwithreported sequencesinGenBank:KP694306.1,KP694305.1,andKP694304.1.

Mix(finalconcentration0.5mMeachdNTP),4.6␮LMgCl2(final

concentration1.5mM),4␮LImProm-IITM5XReactionBuffer,

0.5␮LRecombinantRNasinRibonucleaseInhibitor(Promega,

USA)(2500Units) and 3.9␮Lnuclease-free watertoreach a

finalvolumeof15␮L.

PCR was performed using the primers VP6F

(5′-GACGGVGCRACTACATGGT-3) and VP6R (5

-GTCCAATTCATNCCTGGTGG-3′) designed to amplify a

379bp fragment of VP6 gene (GenBank accession

num-berKJ940164.1);theseprimersarelocatedinthenucleotides

750–769and920–939respectively.Thereactionwasperformed

using1.5␮Lofbothprimersata20␮molconcentrationplus

3␮LofcDNA,5␮LofGoTaq®GreenMasterMix(Promega,USA)

reactionbuffer(pH8.5)containing400␮Mofeachnucleotide

dATP, dGTP, dCTP, dTTP, 2.5␮L of MgCl2 and 0.5␮Lof taq

polymerase. The reaction included 11␮L of nuclease-free

watertoafinalvolumeof25␮L.

Allreactionswereperformedunderthe following

condi-tions:1cycleat94◦C5min,followedby35cyclesat94C1min, 61◦C1min,72Cfor2minandafinalextensionat72C5min.

Ampliconswere loadedina2.0%agarosegel(stained with

0.5mg/mLofethidiumbromide)andvisualizedbymeansofa

UVBio-ImagingSystemsMiniBisProtransilluminator(Fig.1).

Inthecaseofparvovirus,100ngofDNAfromeach

sam-ple was used for PCR. Previously, we designed a pair of

primers:ParvoInt2FB(5′-TCAAGCAGATGGTGATCCAAG-3)and

ParvoInt2CR(5′-GGTACATTATTTAATGCAGTTA-3)toamplifya

275bpfragmentoftheVP2genefragment.Theseprimersare

locatedbetweennucleotides1107–1130and1360–1382ofthe

genesequence(GenBankaccessionnumberFJ0051962c).

Reac-tionscontained2␮Lofbothprimersata20␮Mconcentration,

plus12.5␮LofGoTaq®GreenMasterMix(Promega,USA)

con-tainingtheenzymeDNApolymerase,reactionbuffer(pH8.5),

400␮MofeachnucleotidedATP,dGTP,dCTP,dTTPand3mM

MgCl2.28.5␮Lofnuclease-freewaterwasaddedtoobtaina

finalvolumeof50␮L.

ThefollowingconditionswereusedinallPCRreactions:

onecycleat94◦Cfor5min,35cyclesat94Cfor30s,52Cfor 1min,72◦Cfor1minandafinalextensionat72Cfor5min.

Theelectrophoresisofampliconswasachievedina2%agarose

gel(stainedwith0.5mg/mLethidiumbromide)andvisualized

ina UVBio-ImagingSystemsMiniBis Protransilluminator

(Fig.1).

Inordertoverifyprimerspecificity,ampliconsfrom

posi-tivecontrolsweresequenced.Sequencingwasaccomplished

throughthefollowingprocedure:first,PCRproductswere

puri-fied from agarose gel using the Wizard® SV Gel and PCR

Clean-UpSystem(Promega,USA).Next,30ngofpurifiedPCR

product was sequencedby means ofthe Dye® Terminator

v.3.1 Sequencing Kit(Applied Biosystems, USA).Sequences

wereprocessedina3100sequenceanalyzer(Applied

Biosys-tems, Foster City, CA, USA) and reaction sequences were

analyzedinaPRISM® 3130xl ABI analyzer(Applied

Biosys-tems, USA). Due to inconsistencies on the extremes of

theobtainedsequences,thesewereeditedconsideringonly

250-nucleotide-long final for the alignment, DNA BLAST

(http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) was utilized for

(4)

772

brazilian journal of microbiology48(2017)769–773

Table1–Clinicalsignsandhematologicfindingsindogs infectedwithcanineparvovirus(CPV-2),dogsinfected withcaninerotavirus(CRV)andco-infected

(parvovirus–rotavirus)dogswithgastroenteritis.

Clinical findings/typeof infection

%with CPV (n=27)

%with CRV (n=7)

%with CPV–CRV (n=11)

Abdominalpain 66.6 28.5 81.8

Anorexia 33.3 0 72.7

Lethargy 81.4 14.2 100

Vomiting 44.4 14.2 54.5

Fever(>39.5◦C) 14.8 0 36.3

Hemorrhagic diarrhea

70.3 14.2 90.9

Mucoiddiarrhea 29.6 85.7 9.0

Leukocytosis 0 28.5 18.1

Leukopenia 40.7 0 54.5

Panleukopenia 14.8 0 36.3

Clinicalsigns,physicalexamination,andlaboratorytestresultsin dogswithviralenteritis.Referencerangesfortotalleukocytecount: 6.0–17.0×109/L,panleukopeniareferstogenerallowcountsofall leukocytecount.

availableinthe GenBank,specifically withGU565078.1and JX866792.1 for rotavirus and KP682524.1 for parvovirus; sequencealignmentsanalyseswereperformedwiththeuseof ClustalWmethod,utilizingBioEditSequenceAlignmentEditor

(http://www.mbio.ncsu.edu/BioEdit/bioedit.html).

Thesequencesobtainedwerematched100%withthe

Gen-Banksequences(Fig.2),whichindicatesthatprimersusedfor

PCRandRT-PCRinthisstudy,arespecificforgenome

ampli-ficationofbothviruses.Therefore,theanalysisofallsamples

wasaccomplishedusingbothPCRandRT-PCRprotocols.Out

of50dogs,82%(45/50)were positiveforatleastoneofthe

twoviruses, specifically,60% (27/45) were positive onlyfor

parvovirus,8%(7/45)werepositiveonlyforrotavirusand14%

(11/45)wereco-infected.Fivesamples,whichwerenot

posi-tiveforeitherparvovirusorrotavirus,werepositiveforcanine

distemperorSalmonellaspp.(datanotshown).

Asageneralobservation,theclinicalsignsofrotaviruswere

milderthatthoseofparvovirus;dogsinfectedwithrotavirus

exclusively, displayed abdominal pain, lethargy, vomiting,

mucoiddiarrhea andinsomecasesleukocytosis. However,

intheco-infecteddogsseveregastroentericsymptomswere

observedinadditiontoleukopenia, panleukopenia,mucoid

orhemorrhagicdiarrhea,vomitingandlethargy.These

symp-toms were evenmore severe that those observed in dogs

infectedwithonlyparvovirus(Table1).

Datafrom thepresentstudywere comparedtoprevious

studies,andourresultsshowarelativelyhighpercentageof

dogswithco-infection(14%)inrelationtofindingsinother

countries,forinstance2.4%hasbeenreportedinU.S.A., as

inferred from reverse passive hemagglutination (RPHA), in

Japan,1.2%wasestimatedfromviralisolationand2%using

electronmicroscopy,whileinItalytherewereno

identifica-tionsusingPAGE.1,2,4Theselowpercentagesmightberelated

tothetechniquesemployedinthesestudies,inthissense,in

thepresentstudyRT-PCRwasusedwhichhasdemonstrateda

highersensitivity.16Itisalsopossiblethatcontrastingresults

areinfluencedbythecountrywherestudieswereconducted,

asitiswelldocumentedthatdifferentrotavirusgenotypesare

associatedwithlow-incomeareas.Furthermore,other

stud-ieshavereportedthepresenceofrotavirusonlyinpupsless

thantwomonthsofageornewborns,11however,inthisstudy

rotavirusinfectionwasdetectedindogsolderthan6months.

Thisreportisthefirststudydemonstratingthepresence

of circulating rotavirus in dogs from the State of Mexico.

Althoughrotavirusisoflittleimportanceforveterinariansas ithaslowmortalityrate,inthepresentstudyitwasobserved toplayanimportantroleinseverityofviralgastroenteritis,

especiallywhenassociatedtocanineparvovirus.Ontheother

hand,althoughparvovirusisconsideredthemostimportant

pathogenincaninegastroenteritis,rotavirusisofspecial inter-esttopublichealthduetoitszoonoticpotential.Insupportof this,thereexistreportsofinter-speciestransmissionofcanine rotavirusoftheG3grouptochildreninItalyandTaiwan.10

Althoughthisisthefirstreportofrotavirusincaninesof

the StateofMexico,futuremolecularepidemiology studies

shouldbeconductedtoidentifythecirculatinggenotypesin

dogpopulationsthroughoutMexico,asthiswillincreaseour

understandingontheimportanceofrotavirusindogs.

Financial

support

TheauthorswouldliketothanktotheFundaciónEducación

Superior-Empresa,A.C.forthefinancialsupport.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarednopotentialconflictsofinterestwith

respecttotheresearch,authorship,and/orpublicationofthis article.

Acknowledgement

AriadnaFloresthanktoConsejoNacionaldeCienciay

Tec-nologíaforthescholarshipawardedforpostgraduatedstudies

inUniversidadAutónomadelEstadodeMéxico,Programade

MaestriayDoctoradoenCienciasAgropecuariasyRecursos

Naturales.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1.MosallanejadB,ShapouriM,AvizehR,etal.Antigenic

detectionofCaninerotavirusgroupAindiarrheicdogsin

Ahvazdistrict,SouthwesternIran.CompClinPathol.

2015;24:899–902.

2.GizziAB,OliveiraST,LeuteneggerCM,etal.Presenceof

infectiousagentsandco-infectionsindiarrheicdogs

determinedwithareal-timepolymerasechain

reaction-basedpanel.BMCVetRes.2014;16:10–23.

3.MartellaV,PratelliA,EliaG,DecaroN,TempestaM,

BuonavogliaC.Isolationandgeneticcharacterizationoftwo

G3P5A[3]caninerotavirusstrainsinItaly.JVirolMethods.

2001;96:43–49.

4.MochizukiM,HashimotoM,IshidaT.Recentepidemiological

statusofcanineviralentericinfectionsandGiardiainfection

(5)

5.PérezR,CallerosL,MarandinoA.Phylogeneticand

genome-widedeep-sequencinganalysesofcanine

parvovirusrevealco-infectionwithfieldvariantsand

emergenceofarecentrecombinantstrain.PLOSONE.

2014;9:1–10.

6.DecaroN,MartellaV,EliaG.Tissuedistributionofthe

antigenicvariantsofcanineparvovirustype2indogs.Vet

Microbiol.2007;121:39–44.

7.PrittieJ.Canineparvoviralenteritis:areviewofdiagnosis,

management,andprevention.JVetEmergCritCare.

2004;14:167–176.

8.MarkovichJ,StuckerK,CarrA,HarbisonC,ScarlettJ,Parrish

C.Effectsofcanineparvovirusstrainvariationson

diagnostictestofenteritisindog.JAmVetAssoc.2012;241:

66–72.

9.LammCG,RezabekGB.Parvovirusinfectionindomestic

companionanimals.VetClinNorthAmSmallAnimPract.

2008;38:837–850.

10.MosallanejadB,ShapouriM,AvizehR,PoUrmahdiM.

AntigenicdetectionofcaninerotavirusgroupAindiarrheic

dogsinAhvazdistrict,SouthwesternIran.CompClinPathol.

2015;24:899–902.

11.KangB,SongD,JunqK,etal.Geneticcharacterizationof

caninerotavirusisolatedfromapuppyinKoreaand

experimentalreproductionofdisease.JVetDiagnInvestig.

2007;19:78–83.

12.TuplerT,LevyJK,SabshinSJ.Enteropathogensidentifiedin

dogsenteringaFloridaanimalshelterwithnormalfecesor

diarrhea.JAmVetMedAssoc.2012;241:338–343.

13.YesilbagK,YilmazZ,OzkulA.Aetiologicalroleofvirusesin

puppieswithdiarrhea.VetRec.2008;161:169–170.

14.GreenC,DecaroN.Canineviralenteritis.In:GreeneCE,ed.

InfectiousDiseasesoftheDogsandCats.4thed.St.Louis,

Missouri,U.S.A.:Saunders,Elsevier;2012:67–75.

15.RimmelzwaanG,GroenJ,EgberinkH.Theuseof

enzyme-linkedimmunosorbentassaysystemsforserology

andantigendetectioninparvovirus,coronavirusand

rotavirusinfectionsindogsintheNetherlands.VetMicrobiol.

1991;26:25–40.

16.LunchsA,CilliA,MorilloSG.RareG3Protavirusstrain

detectedinBrazil:possiblehuman–canineinterspecies

Imagem

Fig. 1 – (A) Parvovirus amplicons. The picture shows a 2.0% agarose gel containing PCR products (275 bp) from different samples
Fig. 2 – (A) The 250 nucleotides sequenced from the amplified fragments of canine rotavirus samples; sequences obtained were compared with sequences reported in GenBank: GU565078.1, JX866792.1, and EU708927.1
Table 1 – Clinical signs and hematologic findings in dogs infected with canine parvovirus (CPV-2), dogs infected with canine rotavirus (CRV) and co-infected

Referências

Documentos relacionados

A Ponto de Fuga lida com um grande número de reedições (tanto por motivos ideológicos – como já referido, os fundadores têm interesse em recuperar obras

Rapid diagnosis of encephalomyocarditis virus infections in pigs using a reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.. CRC Press, Boca Raton,

PCR using the MP3H-MP1L primers, which amplify a fragment of the kDNA minicircle region of the subgenus Leishmania (Viannia) , showed high positivity in human and canine

Type E is a putatively uncommon cause of enterotoxemia of lambs, calves and..

perfringens isolates that produced animal disease were submitted to PCR assay using primer sets to detect the presence of genes encoding alpha toxin.. MATERIALS

Comparison of the use of indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA), immunochromatography assay (ICA-BD) and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for

Through the experiments using ODN to intervene resistin-induced cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, we found that cell surface area, protein synthesis, BNP and β -MHC expression

Milk samples were obtained from bulk tanks and subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the identification of Mollicutes , Mycoplasma spp., and Mycoplasma