CONTROLLING SMALL MOVEMENTS OF ULTRA PRECISE DC ELECTRIC DRIVE WITH ELASTIC SHAFTING

525: 582.471 (470.67)

03.00.00

Ь А

TAXUS BACCATA

А А А

SPIN- =5316-4410 parizat.omarova.87@mail.ru

. . .,

SPIN- =7698-3325 gorbotsad@mail.ru

ГБ Г ы ч 367025,Р я, . ч , . .Г ,45; . ./ :

(8722) 67-58-77 Taxus baccata - . « » , . ,

100% .

, , , , , , . , , , . , : , , , ,

UDC 525: 582.471 (470.67)

Biological sciences

THE VARIABILITY OF TAXUS BACCATA

CYPRESS CONES AT POPULATION OF DAGESTAN

Omarova Parizat Kurbanalievna Chief specialist

RSCI SPIN-code=5316-4410 parizat.omarova.87@mail.ru

Asadulaev Zagirbeg Magomedovich Dr.Sci.Biol., professor

RSCI SPIN-code=7698-3325 gorbotsad@mail.ru

FGBUN Mountain botanical garden of the Dagestan scientific centre of RAS, 367025, M. Gadzhiev St., 45, Makhachkala, Russia; tel.: (8722) 67-58-77

In the populations of Taxus baccata of Foothills and Inside Mountain Dagestan, we have studied intra- and interpopulation variability of morphological characters of yew berry. The article has a contribution of

interpopulation differences in the feature of "diameter of funnel" with the highest rates in Buynaksk

population and dependency of the form of yew berry from this feature. According to the results of

discriminant analysis, we have revealed a distinction in populations on this basis, although the classification matrix has not given 100% of the forecast for any of them. It is found, that the seeds of Khunzah population have relatively large dimensions and yew berry has more flattened shape compared to piedmont

populations, while the differences in populations based on seeds are more pronounced than based on yew berry at low volatility of the characteristics of the first indicators. It is shown, that the characteristics of seeds and yew berry of Khunzakh population indicate the presence of certain genetic differences between populations inside mountain and foothills, and that the higher dissemination activity of first population is aimed at self-preservation, due to the less favorable conditions for the species. It is expected that the low variability of the average values for yew berries of cypress characteristics indicates the stability of the soil and climatic conditions of its habitats

я

Taxus baccata

L

.

я я

Д14;3],

,

-

Д7;18].

,

,

,

,

Taxus baccata

L

.

.

. Д15],

.

Д2].

Taxus baccata

Marta Dubreuil

., Д19]

Richard W.Spjut

Д20],

:

(

,

,

,

).

Richard W.Spjut [20].

,

,

,

.

T. baccata

–

2010 .

.

-

800

–1050

.

.

1350 .

(

,

,

)

.

,

,

400 800

.

-27

–30˚ ,

+20˚ .

.

:

–

-

,

400–600

.

-

36˚ ,

+35˚ .

.

1.

1

.-

( )

, .

,

( ) 5 800 47˚ 50' 00,1''42˚ 03' 33,04''

( ) 8 977 46˚ 59,8' 99'' 42˚ 44,2'22''

-( ) 6 1044 46˚ 34' 40,4'' 42˚ 58' 04,4''

,

. .

.

T. baccata

L

.

,

«

Haglof

».

T. baccata

.

30

,

:

,

,

,

,

.

«

Ohaus

»

1 ;

-

0,1 .

Д4;6

Statistica

5.5].

Д8].

. .

Д6].

(

. 2).

«

»

,

,

,

(

.1).

,

,

,

.

,

,

,

.

,

0,

93; 0,80.

(

).

(

)

.

.

,

.

,

;

(

. 2).

,

800–1044

,

(1532 ).

:

,

,

,

. .,

,

,

2. –

T. baccata

(

. .) , , , ( ), (), ,

,

(800 )

7,6±0,07 8,1±0,07 403,8±7,16 5,0±0,0 5

4,2±0,0 2

4,8±0,02 5,8±0,0 3

77,2±0, 59

11,7 10,0 21,7 12,2 4,4 5,7 6,8 9,4

(977 )

8,0±0,13 7,9±0,07 460,1±8,35 5,9±0,0 7

4,3±0,0 2

4,9±0,03 5,9±0,0 4

81,0±1, 13

19,9 10,4 22,2 13,8 6,3 8,5 7,3 17,0

(1044 )

7,4±0,08 8,0±0,06 373,4±8,04 4,8±0,0 3

3,9±0,0 3

4,5±0,02 5,3±0,0 4

65,0±0, 81

13,2 9,1 26,4 8,9 7,9 5,7 8,6 15,3

(1532 )

6,5±0,04 7,8±0,05 399,6±5,48 5,4±0,0 3

4,4±0,0 2

5,0±0,02 6,0±0,0 3

89,3±1, 00

6,9 7,6 16,8 7,1 4,8 5,6 6,2 13,7

(CV,%)

16,3 9,4 23,2 13,7 7,3 7,6 8,4 18,1

F

-61,9*** 4,8** 26,5*** 109,8**

*

111,4** *

78,7*** 86,9** *

143,9** *

F 12,5*** 14,5*** 11,8*** 6,0*** 8,3*** 16,7*** 26,8**

*

22,9***

: – 5, – 30, xsx –

, CV,% – , F –

.

(

)

,

,

,

,

-

.

,

,

.

.

CV

, CV,

,

Д10].

,

.

Juniperus virginiana

[17],

Mimulus longiflorus

[16],

Pinus sibirica

,

Picea obovata

,

Pinus sylvestris

[9],

Juniperus oblonga

Д1].

(

. 1)

,

.

.

,

,

.

.

,

,

,

,

. . ..

,

,

-

,

.

-

,

,

,

.

,

.

,

–

.

T. baccata,

«

»,

,

,

,

.

«

» (23,2%).

,

,

( 6,9 26,4%

; 4,4 18,1%

)

.

«

» (41,0%), «

» (

) (40,9%),

«

» (44,6%),

–

«

» (2,2%).

«

» (9,9%), «

»

(12,1%) «

» (8,6%) (

.1).

я я я

я я я

0 20 40 60 80 100

(%

)

.1.

(

h

),

,

(Ы

) (

. 3

).

3.

–

T. baccata

h2,% r2,% r

6,4

27,1 16,1*** -0,40***

9,9

2,3 0,37*** -0,06

7,2

13,5 3,1*** -0,18***

2,4

41,0 2,7*** 0,17***

( ) 3,4

37,5 2,4*** 0,16***

( ) 8,0

31,0 1,2** 0,11**

12,1

32,0 3,6*** 0,19***

8,6

44,6 8,7*** 0,30***

. rxy –

.

,

(Ы

=18,3%)

(Ы

=12,9%).

,

–

,

,

.

(Ы

₎

h

,

.

.

,

,

(

),

,

(

. 3

).

.

,

Д13]

,

.

(

.4

).

,

,

,

,

.

,

.

,

,

,

.

,

(800 977 )

.

0,5%

.

,

,

,

.

,

.

«

» «

», «

»

.

«

» «

».

1040

.

1532

(

)

,

,

,

,

.

.

4

.

–

T.

baccata

800 977 1040 1532

–

0,72* 0,66* 0,80* 0,41* 0,64*

–

0,41* 0,51* 0,78* 0,46* 0,50*

–

0,22* 0,28* -0,05 0,39* 0,33*

–

0,08 0,15 0,38* 0,44* 0,28*

-

0,23* 0,34* 0,62* 0,17* 0,35*

-

0,17* 0,25* 0,06 0,20* 0,17*

-

0,08 -0,04 0,18 0,10 -0,10*

-

-0,04 0,14 0,50* 0,41* 0,11*

-

0,12 0,03 -0,01 0,23* 0,01

-

,

«

»

(

.5

).

5

.

–

T. baccata

F-54,6*** 44,8***

( ) 19,0***

18,1*** 17,0*** 11,7*** 10,0***

( ) 2,9*

,

,

(

.2).

100%

(

. 6).

71,5%.

(86,7%),

(58,0%),

.

6

.

–

T baccata

,%

70,7 37 87 2 24

58,0 42 1 106 1

70,7 106 19 20 5

86,7 12 6 2 130

1040 1532

.

,

,

(

.7).

.

.

7

.

–

800 977 1040

977 2,95

1040 2,49 8,28

1532 4,07 3,32 9,18

(

. 2)

.

я

977 1040 800 1532

-6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5

К .1

-10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4

К

.2

. 2. .

,

.

1.

«

»

,

.

,

,

,

.

2.

(

)

-T.

baccata

.

3.

,

,

.

,

.

4.

1040

.

1532

(

)

,

,

,

,

5.

100%

.

71,5%.

(86,7%),

(58,0%),

,

.

1. . , . .

. - .: , 2011. - 183 .

2. . . .

. … . . . .: , 2006. - 123 .

3. . .

. . . … . . . ., 1989. -

21 .

4. . . . .: . 1979. - 416 .

5. . .

// . – , 1978. - . 96–120.

6. . . . .: , 1980. - 293 .

7. . , . .: , 1974. - 464 .

8. . .

II. // . -

. 1969. . 64. - . 3-38.

9. . . . .: .

1973. - 284 .

10. . ., . .

//

: . .

« »: X - . .

. - , 2014. - . 186-187.

11. . ., . . -

Juniperus excelsa Bieb //

, 2010, .10. - . 113-117.

12. . .

// . . 1978. - .

54-59.

13. . . : .: - .- . - .

2002. - 308 .

14. . . (Quercus robur L.) //

.: . :

15. . ., . ., . , . .

// « »

: « », 2004. - . 1250-1260.

16. Beeks R.M. Variation and hybridization in southern California populations of Diplacus

(Scrophulariaceae), Aliso, 5. 1962. - P. 83-122.

17. Flake R.H., von Rudloff E., Turner B.L. Quantitative study of clinical variation in

Juniperus virginiana using terpenoid data, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 64. 1969. - P. 487-494.

18. Soule M.E. Allometric variation. I. The theory and some consequences // Amer. NКЭuЫКХТЬЭ. 1982. V. 120. № 6. - P. 751-764.

19. Marta Dubreuil, Miquel Riba, Santiago C. Gonzalez-Martinez, Giovanni G. Vendramin, Federico Sebastiani, and Maria Mayol. Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation revisited: Strong genetic structure in a temperate tree, Taxus baccata (Taxaceae), with great dispersal capability // American Journal of Botany 97(2) America. 2010. - . 303-310. 20. Richard W. Spjut. Overview of Genus Taxus (Taxaceae): The Species, Their Classification, and Female Reproductive Morphology // The World Botanical Associates, Inc Bakersfield, California. 1999. - 29 c.

References

1. Asadulaev Z.M, Sadykova G.A. Strukturnaja i resursnaja ocenka prirodnyh populjacij mozhzhevel'nika prodolgovatogo v Dagestane. - M.: Nauka DNC, 2011. - 183 s.

2. Bazaev A.B. Tis jagodnyj v gornyh lesah Osetii. Osobennosti stroenija i vozobnovitel'nyj pШЭОЧМТКХ НТЬ. … ФКЧН. ЛТШХ. ЧКuФ. SPЛ.: RGB, 2006. - 123 s.

3. Gricenko V.V. Jekologo-geneticheskaja organizacija izmenchivosti populjacij nekotoryh vidov rastenij i nasekomyh. AЯЭШЫОП. НТЬ. … ФКЧН. ЛТШХ. ЧКuФ. L., 1989. - 21 s.

4. Dospehov B.A. Metodika polevogo opyta. M.: Kolos. 1979. - 416 s.

5. Kuz'mina N. A. Izmenchivost' generativnyh organov sosny obyknovennoj v Priangar'e // Selekcija hvojnyh porod Sibiri. – Krasnojarsk, 1978. - S. 96–120.

6. Lakin G.F. Biometrija. M.: vysshaja shkola, 1980. - 293 s. 7. Majr Je. Populjacija, vidy i jevoljucija. M.: Mir, 1974. - 464 s.

8. Mamaev S.A. O problemah i metodah vnutrividovoj sistematiki drevesnyh rastenij II. Amplituda izmenchivosti // Tr. In-ta jekologii rastenij i zhivotnyh UF AN SSSR. 1969. Vyp. 64. - S. 3-38.

9. Mamaev S.A. formy vnutrividovoj izmenchivosti drevesnyh rastenij. M.: Nauka. 1973. - 284 s.

10. Mallaliev M.M., Asadulaev Z.M. Soljarnye i jedaficheskie osobennosti differencieacii parcial'nyh flor Vnutrennegornogo Dagestana // Sravnitel'naja floristika: analiz vidovogo raznoobrazija ЫКЬЭОЧТУ. PЫШЛХОЦв. PОЫЬpОФЭТЯв «TШХЦКМСШЯЬФТО МСЭОЧТУК»: ЦКЭОЫТКХв Б Mezhdunar shkoly-seminara. Krasnodar. Kubanskij gos. uni-t, 2014. - S. 186-187.

11. Nikolaeva A. V., Kuznecov M. E. Vnutri- i mezhpopuljacionnaja izmenchivost' shishkojagod i kolichestva semjan v nih u Juniperus excelsa Bieb v Krymu // Promyshlennaja botanika, 2010, vyp.10. - S. 113-117.

12. Petrov S.A. Zakonomernosti vnutripopuljacionnoj izmenchivosti vidov drevesnyh rastenij // Problemy jevoljucionnoj i populjacionnoj genetiki. Mahachkala. 1978. - S. 54-59.

13. Rostova N.S. Korreljacii: struktura i izmenchivost' SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. Un-ta. 2002. - 308 s.

15. Slepyh V.V., Shider T.G., Kotljarov I.I, Pridnja M.V. Tis jagodnyj v central'noj chasti SОЯОЫЧШРШ KКЯФКгК // JОХОФЭЫШЧЧвУ гСuЫЧКХ «ISSLEDOVANO V ROSSII» MШЬФЯК: FGU «NIIРШЫХОЬУОФШХ», 2004. - S. 1250-1260.

16. Beeks R.M. Variation and hybridization in southern California populations of Diplacus (Scrophulariaceae), Aliso, 5. 1962. - P. 83-122.

17. Flake R.H., von Rudloff E., Turner B.L. Quantitative study of clinical variation in Juniperus virginiana using terpenoid data, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 64. 1969. - P. 487-494. 18. Soule M.E. Allometric variation. I. The theory and some consequences // Amer. NКЭuЫКХТЬЭ. 1982. V. 120. № 6. - P. 751-764.

19. Marta Dubreuil, Miquel Riba, Santiago C. Gonzalez-Martinez, Giovanni G. Vendramin, Federico Sebastiani, and Maria Mayol. Genetic effects of chronic habitat fragmentation revisited: Strong genetic structure in a temperate tree, Taxus baccata (Taxaceae), with great dispersal capability // American Journal of Botany 97(2) America. 2010. - S. 303-310.