The
Journal
of
Supercritical
Fluids
jou rn al h om ep a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / s u p f l u
Molecular
dynamics
simulations
of
momentum
and
thermal
diffusion
properties
of
near-critical
argon
along
isobars
Jakler
Nichele
a,b,
Itamar
Borges
Jr.
a,b,
Alan
B.
Oliveira
c,
Leonardo
S.
Alves
a,d,∗ aDefenseEngineeringGraduateProgram,MilitaryInstituteofEngineering,22290-270RiodeJaneiro,BrazilbChemicalEngineeringDepartment,MilitaryInstituteofEngineering,22290-270RiodeJaneiro,Brazil cDepartmentofPhysics,FederalUniversityofOuroPreto,35400-00OuroPreto,Brazil
dTheoreticalandAppliedMechanicsLaboratory,MechanicalEngineeringDepartment,FluminenseFederalUniversity,24210-240Niterói,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received18October2015
Receivedinrevisedform11April2016 Accepted11April2016
Availableonline12April2016 Keywords:
Shearviscosity Bulkviscosity Thermalconductivity
Equilibriummoleculardynamics Stokeshypothesis
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Threebasicdiffusionpropertiesofargon–shearviscosity,bulkviscosityandthermalconductivity–were studiedintheneighborhoodofthecriticalpointusingmoleculardynamics(MD)andtheLennard-Jones potentialenergyfunction.MDsimulationswereperformedalongthe1.0Pcand1.2Pcisobars.Green-Kubo
relationsandaLennard-Jonespairpotentialwereused.FourdifferentsetsofLennard-Jonesparameters wereused.Acomparisonofcomputedshearviscosityandthermalconductivityvalueswithdataavailable fromtheNationalInstituteofStandardsandTechnology(NIST)displayedagoodagreement.Resultsfor bulkviscosityindicatedthatvaluesofthispropertycannotbeneglectedinthisthermodynamicregion, aresultthatviolatesthetraditionalandmuch-assumedStokeshypothesisinclassicalfluidmechanics. Furthermore,itwasshownthatintheneighborhoodofthecriticalregionthebulkviscositycanhave largervaluesthantheshearviscosity.
©2016ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Fluiddynamicsandheattransfermodelsarestronglyrelated
toaccurate values for transport coefficients. The Navier-Stokes
equation[1]andtheenergyequation[2]incorporateforagiven
substancethreetransport coefficients thatconnect thephysical
dynamicsofmomentumandheattothreeproperties,namely,bulk
viscosity,shearviscosityandthermalconductivity.
Thereareintheliteratureseveraldatasetsthatcollect
exper-imental values of shear and thermal conductivity for simple
substances. Theelectronic tablesfrom theNational Instituteof
StandardsandTechnology(NIST)[3],forinstance,allowthe
solu-tionofagreatnumberoftypicalengineeringproblems.Inthese
cases,thebulkviscosityisgenerallyneglectedbasedonthevalidity
ofStokeshypothesis[4]evenwhenthefluidisneither
incompress-iblenoramonoatomicdilutegas[5].Hence,bulkviscosityvalues
arerarelyfoundintables,technicalworksandengineeringprojects,
eventhoughtheyareneededforthecompletespecificationofthe
Navier-Stokesstresstensor.
∗ Correspondingauthorat:DefenseEngineeringGraduateProgram,Military Insti-tuteofEngineering,22290-270RiodeJaneiro,Brazil.
E-mailaddress:leonardo.alves@mec.uff.br(L.S.Alves).
However,intheneighborhoodofthecriticalpoint,availability
oftransportcoefficientdataisscarce.Moreover,theoryand
exper-imentdisplayanomaliesinthebehaviorofsomethermodynamic
andtransportproperties,usuallyappearsasadivergencetowards
infiniteorzerodependingontheproperty[6–10].Inparticular,
thehighcompressibilityofnear-criticalfluidsreducesthe
accu-racyofexperimentalmeasurements.Forthisclassoffluids,bulk
viscositydataareevenmorelimitedsincetheacousticabsorption
ofsoundwaves–themostusedexperimentaltechnique[11,12]
–issubject tohighlevelsoferror.Toovercomethisdrawback,
Brillouinscatteringwasdeveloped asa promising techniqueto
measurebulkviscosity,thoughitisstillnotwidelyknownandused
[13].
In order to overcome the aforementioned experimental
limitations, an interesting possibility is performing molecular
simulationsthatcansuitablymodelthenear-criticalstateand
com-putetransportcoefficients.Oneofthesemethodsisequilibrium
moleculardynamics(MD)[14–16].Inthisapproach,fundamental
thermophysicalpropertiessuchasenergy,temperature,pressure
canbedeterminedfromspecificaveragesofthedynamic
evolu-tionofanensembleofmolecules.Otherpropertiesareobtained
using relationsfrom thermodynamics and statisticalmechanics
including time correlations, e.g., transport properties [17].This
methodisusefulintheinvestigationsofphasediagrams[18]and
chemical reactions [19]. In the framework of MD, particle
tra-http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2016.04.004
10
20
30
40
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
s(μ
Pa
·s
)
T
r10
20
30
40
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
s(μ
Pa
·s
)
T
r10
20
30
40
50
60
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
s(μ
Pa
·s)
T
r(d)
10
20
30
40
50
60
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
s(μ
Pa
·s)
T
r(c)
10
20
30
40
50
60
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
η
s(μ
Pa
·s
)
T
r(e)
Fig.1.Shearviscositycomputedusing104argonatomsintheMDsimulationforP=1.0P
cinarangeofreducedtemperaturesfrom1.0to2.0usingtheLennard-Jonespotential
withdifferentparameterspairs–(a)[25],(b)[26],(c)[29],(d)[30]–and(e)theaveragevalueswitherrorbars.
jectoriesin phase spacedefined bypositions andvelocities are
computedfromtheforcesresultingfromaninteractionpotential
energybetweenpairsofatomsandmolecules.Themostemployed
modelfornon-bondedparticlesistheLennard-Jones(L-J)
poten-tial[20]. It hasa simple mathematical expressionand leadsto
accurateresultsnotably inthestudyofnoblegases.TheL-Jhas
alreadybeenusedtocomputetransportpropertiesof
supercrit-ical fluidsfar fromtheir critical points, transport properties of
near-criticalfluidsusingother approachesand otherproperties
[21–26].
In this work, we investigated transport properties of
near-critical argon using equilibrium MD. The present simulations
are based on Green-Kubo theory and use four different
ver-sionsofargonLennard-Jonespotentialsavailableintheliterature.
The importance of investigating argonin this workis twofold.
First, it is the most abundant noble gas in the atmosphere.
Second, it is an important substance employed for calibration
purposes in laboratoriesbecauseit is chemicallyinert and has
a low cost. The present resultswere compared with available
experimental data, which allows one to estimate their range
of applicability. Due to the scarcity of bulk viscosity
experi-mental values, especial emphasis was given to this transport
propertyinsuchawaythattheycanbeusedinsimulationsof
compressible fluid flow [27] aswell as heat transfer problems
[28].
2. Fundamentals
2.1. MoleculardynamicsandtheLennard-Jonespotential
ThebasisoftheMDtechniqueisthecomputationalsimulation
ofNewton’s equationofmotionfora setofinteractingmoving
particles.Forasystemconsistingofargonatomsinaregularbox,
onlyinteractionsbetweenpairsofnon-bondedatomswere
consid-ered.Inotherwords,many-bodyinteractionsarenotconsidered
explicitly.
Apairpotentialsuitablymodelstheinteractionsbetweenatom
pairs.ThesimplestrealisticmodelforthispurposeistheL-J12-6
potential.ItisatwoparametersmodelgivenbyEq.(1)
ULJ(rij)=
4/rij12−/rij6 , rij≤rc 0, rij>rc (1)whereε isthedepthofthepotentialwell,is thezero-energy
distance,rij isthedistancebetweenparticlesiandj,andrc isa
cut-offdistancethatplaysanimportantroleinreducingthe
com-putationalcost.Tousethispotentialitisnecessarytocorrectthe
computedvalueofthepotentialinordertoincludethesmall
ener-giesresultingfromlong-rangeinteractionsfartherthanrc[20].The
10
20
30
40
50
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
s(μ
Pa·
s)
T
r10
20
30
40
50
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
s(μ
Pa·
s)
T
r10
20
30
40
50
60
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
s(μ
Pa
·s
)
T
r(d)
10
20
30
40
50
60
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
s(μ
Pa
·s
)
T
r(c)
10
20
30
40
50
60
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
η
s(μ
Pa·
s)
T
r(e)
Fig.2.Shearviscositycomputedusing104argonatomsintheMDsimulationforP=1.2P
cinarangeofreducedtemperaturesfrom1.0to2.0usingLennard-Jonespotential
withdifferentparameterspairs–(a)[25],(b)[26],(c)[29],(d)[30]–and(e)theaveragevalueswitherrorbars.
-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 Norm a liz ed J p mn co rr e la ti o n t(ps) P = 1.00 Pc Tr = 1.00 Tr = 1.10 Tr = 2.00 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 10 20 30 40 Norm a liz ed J p mn co rr e la ti o n t(ps) P = 1.20 Pc Tr = 1.00 Tr = 1.10 Tr = 2.00
Fig.3.Correlationsofoff-diagonalstresstensorelementsof104argonatomsintheMDsimulationof1.0P
cand1.2Pcisobarsforthreetemperatures1.00Tc,1.10Tcand2.00Tc
usingLennard-Jonespotentialparametersfrom[25].
termdescribesattractioneffects.Eachi–jpairofparticlesinteracts
viaaforcefijthatcanbecalculatedfrom
fij=−
∇
ULJ(rij) (2)Themotionof eachparticleisdeterminedfromitsresultant
force. An important feature of MD is that an accurate
poten-tialenergyexpressiongenerallyleadstoaccuratethermophysical
properties. When using the Lennard-Jones 12-6 expression, all
possiblemodelchoicesarerestrictedtoselectingandεvalues
inadditiontoaspecialcareconcerningthercvaluesinallcases.In
ordertoconsideruncertaintiesoftheLJpotentialparametrization
ofargon,fourdifferentpairsofandεandtheirrespectivecritical
constantswereusedandcomparedinthiswork.Theyareshown
inTable1.
InMDsimulationsitispossibletoadopttheconceptof
0
20
40
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
κ
(mW/
m·
K
)
T
r0
20
40
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
κ
(mW/
m·
K
)
T
r0
20
40
60
80
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
κ
(m
W
/m·
K
)
T
r(d)
0
20
40
60
80
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
κ
(m
W
/m·
K
)
T
r(c)
0
20
40
60
80
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
κ
(m
W
/m·
K
)
T
r(e)
104.921Fig.4.Thermalconductivityof104argonatomsforP=1.0P
cinarangeofreducedtemperaturesfrom1.0to2.0usingLennard-Jonespotentialwithdifferentparameters
pairs–(a)[25],(b)[26],(c)[29],(d)[30]–and(e)theaveragevalueswitherrorbars.
Table1
ParameterpairsfortheLennard-Jones12-6potentialargonatomsalongwiththeir respectivecriticalconstants.
ModelParameters CriticalConstants Ref.
(Å) /kB(K−1) Tc(K) Pc(atm) c(kg/m3)
3.405 119.8 150.86 48.34 535.397 Michelsetal.[25]
3.43 119.3 150.86 – 535.397 Levelt[26]
3.345 125.7 150.86 – 527.265 White[29]
3.3952 116.79 153.00 51.42 532.107 Vrabecetal.[30]
Tc:criticaltemperature;Pc:criticalpressure;c:criticaldensity;kB:Boltzmann
constant.
isolatedsystem(e.g.,microcanonicalorNVEensemble),aclosed
system (canonical, isochoric-isothermal or NVT ensemble), an
isobaric-isothermalsystem(NPTensemble),among other
possi-bilities,withoutusingpartitionfunctionsthatmaybedifficultto
compute.Beforephysicalargumentsareconsidered,thechoiceof
anensembleisrelatedtotheuseofaspecificnumericalintegration
schemeoftheequationsofmotion.Eachalgorithmcaninclude
arti-ficialthermostatsorbarostatstocontrolthebasicthermodynamic
variables—N,V,TandP[14].Themathematicalexpressionsusedin
MDandderivedfromstatisticalmechanicstheoryforcomputing
thethermophysicalpropertiesofinterestmustbeobtainedfrom
suitableensembles.
It is also important to avoid edge effects. For this
pur-pose,MDsimulationsofbulksystemsgenerallyemployperiodic
boundaryconditions.Theseartificialboundariesimposedonthe
systemrestrict thesimulation boxsize. Thisapproach is called
minimal-image convention and it states that the characteristic
dimensionofthesimulationbox–thelengthforacubicbox–must
begreaterthantwicethecutoffradiusrc.
2.2. Green-Kuboformulasfortransportproperties
Equilibrium MD employs Green-Kubo formulas [31] for the
computation of shear and bulk viscosity as well as of thermal
conductivity.Thethreecoefficientscouldbeobtained
experimen-tally by perturbing the systemtowards non-equilibrium states
and observing its response that is associated with irreversible
processes. Therefore,in principle,to computethemone should
usenon-equilibriummoleculardynamics(NEMD)insteadof
equi-librium MD. NEMDisbased onthedirectapplication ofa heat
ormomentumfluxonthesimulation box[32,33].On theother
hand,thefluctuationdissipationtheoremallowsthecomputation
oftransportcoefficientsfromthemicroscopicfluctuationsofthe
system.Thistheoremstatesthatsmallfluctuationsofthesystem
arerelatedtointernalrelaxationprocesses.Therefore,transport
coefficientsthencanbecalculatedasintegralsoftime-correlation
functions of the microscopic stress tensor and internal energy
fluxesinanequilibriumstate.
Shear viscositys is related totheresistanceof thefluid to
0
20
40
60
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
κ
(mW
/m·
K
)
T
r0
20
40
60
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
κ
(mW
/m·
K
)
T
r0
20
40
60
80
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
κ
(mW
/m·
K
)
T
r(d)
0
20
40
60
80
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
κ
(mW
/m·
K
)
T
r(c)
0
20
40
60
80
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
κ
(mW
/m
·K
)
T
rAverage Results for κ and NIST data at 1.00P
cFig.5.Thermalconductivityof104argonatomsforP=1.2P
cinarangeofreducedtemperaturesfrom1.0to2.0usingLennard-Jonespotentialwithdifferentparameterpairs
–(a)[25],(b)[26],(c)[29],(d)[30]–and(e)theaveragevalueswitherrorbars.
-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Norm a lize d J Q co rr e la ti o n t(ps) P = 1.00 Pc Tr = 1.00 Tr = 1.10 Tr = 2.00 -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 Norm a lize d J Q co rr e la ti o n t(ps) P = 1.20 Pc Tr = 1.00 Tr = 1.10 Tr = 2.00
Fig.6.Heatfluxcorrelationsof104argonatomsof1.0P
cand1.2Pcisobarsforthreetemperatures1.00Tc,1.10Tcand2.00TcusingLennard-Jonespotentialparametersfrom
[25].
propertyisobtainedbyintegratingtheensembleaverageofthe
timecorrelationfunctionofthestresstensorJpoff-diagonal
ele-ments,whichrepresentthemomentumfluxes,
s= 1 3kBVT
m<n ∞ 0 Jp mn(0)Jmnp (t)dt (3)wheremandnareindexesrepresentingtheCartesiancoordinates
x,yandzwithm /=n,kBistheBoltzmannconstant,andVandTare
respectivelythevolumeandtemperatureofthesystem.
Thebulkviscositybdescribestheresistanceofafluidto
dilata-tionassumingasmallvolumeelementofconstantshape.Inthe
10
20
30
40
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
b(μ
Pa·
s)
T
r10
20
30
40
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
b(μ
Pa·
s)
T
r10
20
30
40
50
60
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
b(μ
Pa·
s)
T
r(d)
10
20
30
40
50
60
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
b(μ
Pa·
s)
T
r(c)
10
20
30
40
50
60
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
η
b(μ
Pa
·s
)
T
r(e)
206.263 180.856 2777.02 798.348Fig.7. Bulkviscosityof104argonatomsfor1.0P
cisobarinarangeofreducedtemperaturesfrom1.0to2.0usingLennard-Jonesmodelwithdifferentparameterspairs–(a)
[25],(b)[26],(c)[29],(d)[30]–and(e)theaveragevaluesofbcomparedtotheaveragevaluesofsforthesameisobar.
theensembleaverageofthetimecorrelationfunctionofthestress
tensorJpdiagonalelementsminustheproductPV.Inotherwords,
b= 1 3kBVT
m ∞ 0 (Jp mm(0)−P(0)V)(Jmmp (t)−P(t)V)dt (4)Thermalconductivity,,physicallyexpressestheabilityofthe
substanceintransferringthermalenergywhensubjectto
temper-aturegradients.Itiscomputedbyintegratingtheensembleaverage
oftimecorrelationfunctionofthemicroscopicheatfluxJQvector,
namely, = 1 3kBVT2
∞ 0 JQ(0)·JQ(t)dt (5)InEqs.(3)and(4),thestresstensorJpcanbecomputedfrom
Jp= N
i=1 mivivi− N i=1 N j>i rij−∇
Uij (6)wheremiisthemassoftheparticlei,Uij theinteraction
poten-tial between particles i and j, and the prime means matrix
transpose.Diagonalelementshavetheindexmequalton.InEq.
(5),theenergyfluxvectoriscalculatedfrom
JQ = 1 V
⎡
⎣
N i=1 eivi+ 1 2 N i<j1 (−∇
Uij·(vi+vj))rij⎤
⎦
(7)whereeiistheenergy,potentialandkinetic,ofparticleiwhereas
v
iisthevelocityofparticlei.2.3. Near-criticaleffects
Thethermophysicalandrheologicalpropertiesofasubstance
in the neighborhood of the critical point are characterized by
ananomalousbehavior.Thesecriticalanomaliesareobservedas
divergenceseithertozeroorinfinity.Theoryandexperimentshow
thatbulkandshearviscositiesandthermalconductivitydivergeto
infinityinthevicinityofthecriticalpoint[34,23,35–39,21,40,41].
Oneimportantfeatureofthesedivergencesistheiruniversality,
i.e.,theyaredescribedbyuniversalparametersandexpressions
thatdonotdependonthenatureofthefluid.Thesemodelsare
powerlawshavingasingleparameterthatindicatestheseparation
ofeachthermodynamicstatefromthecriticalpoint.Forthetwo
viscositiesandthermalconductivity,thisparameteristhe
temper-aturedifferenceT=T−Tc.However,itisalsoimportanttoidentify
10
30
50
70
90
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
b(μ
Pa·
s)
T
r10
30
50
70
90
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
b(μ
Pa·
s)
T
r10
30
50
70
90
110
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
b(μ
Pa·
s)
T
r(d)
10
30
50
70
90
110
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
η
b(μ
Pa·
s)
T
r(c)
10
30
50
70
90
110
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2.0
2.1
η
b(μ
Pa·
s)
T
r(e)
296.885 (for 1.04Tc)Fig.8.Bulkviscosityof104argonatomsfor1.2P
cisobarinarangeofreducedtemperaturesfrom1.0to2.0usingLennard-Jonesmodelwithdifferentparameterspairs–(a)
[25],(b)[26],(c)[29],(d)[30]–and(e)theaveragevaluesofbcomparedtotheaveragevaluesofsforthesameisobar.
Fig.9. Correlationsofdiagonalstresstensorelementsof104argonatomsof1.0P
cand1.2Pcisobarsforthreetemperatures1.00Tc,1.10Tcand2.00TcusingLennard-Jones
potentialparametersfrom[26].
differentpathsleadtodifferentpowerlawcoefficientsthatcould
berelatedthroughanequationofstate[6].Forinstance,alongthe
criticalisochore,onehas
≈◦T+− (8)
s≈s◦T− (9)
where=0.630±0.001,=0.031±0.004and =1.239±0.002are
universalexponentsobtainedfromrenormalizationgrouptheory
[42], with ◦ and s◦ depending on the substance. In
particu-lar,studiesseekingtounderstandthebehaviorofbulkviscosity
nearcriticalconditionsarerare.Fiveofthemostrepresentative
onesbasedeitheronMonteCarlosimulations,oronMDandeven
importantsinceitcanhelpovercomingthesedifficultiesasshown next.
3. Computationalmethods
The MDsimulations werecarried out usingtheopen source
codeLAMMPS[47].Shearviscosityandthermalconductivitywere
computedintheNVTensembleusinga Nosé-Hooverstyle
non-Hamiltonian equation of motion [48] in order to improve the
control ofthe simulation temperature.In order topreventany
influenceover pressure fluctuations,bulk viscosityvalues were
obtainedintheNVEensembleusingtheVerletalgorithm.
Followingrecent papers focusing onnearcritical MD
simu-lations[9,49],weused104 argonatomsin allsimulations.This
numberofparticlesleadstoabettercontrolofthethermodynamic
stateinthesimulationboxandimprovedstatisticalaverages.The
numericalintegrationofthetimecorrelationfunctionsofthe
trans-portcoefficients(Eqs.(3)–(5))usedthetrapezoidalruleoverall
timesteps.Eachsimulationwasequilibratedfor2ns(2×106time
steps)beforeaverageswerecomputedforatimespanof10ns(107
timesteps).Atimestepof1fswasused.Correlationsofheatand
momentumfluxeswerecomputedforasamplinglengthof200ps
(2×105 timesteps).A largecutoff radiusof8 waschosento
improvetheaccuracyinthecalculationoftheinteractionenergies
andbetterdescribelong-rangecorrelationstypicalofthecritical
region.Thecorrectioninthepotentialforrij>rcwascomputed
inte-gratingaunitaryradialdistributionfunctionforthesedistances
[20].By employinga largevalueoftherc distance,simulations
weremorerealisticforadensefluidanddescribedmoreaccurately
long-rangecorrections.Periodicboundaryconditionswereused.A
temperaturerangefrom1.0Tcupto2.0Tcalongtwoisobars–1.0Pc
and1.2Pc–wasconsidered.ThefourpairsofL-Jparametersshown
inTable1wereusedinthecomputations.Moredetailsaboutthe
simulationprocedurecanbefoundelsewhere[18].
4. Resultsanddiscussion
Figs.1and2showshearviscosityresultsofargonobtainedfrom
theMDsimulationsalongthe1.0Pc and1.2Pc isobarsusingfour
differentsetsofL-Jparameterstakenfromtheliterature(Table1).
Therearenosignificantdifferencesbetweentheresults
com-puted using all the L-J parameter pairs according to Table 1.
Therefore,computationof theshearviscosityisbarelysensitive
tosmallvariationsintheparametersoftheinteractionpotential.
Furthermore,MDsimulationswereabletoreproducethe
behav-ioroftheshearviscositycriticaldivergencequitewell.Figs.1eand
2eshowthatsimulationsareingoodagreementwithNISTdata.
TheresultsobtainedusingMichelsetal.[25]parametersfortheL-J
potentialexhibitabetterdescriptionofthecriticaldivergencein
theshearviscosity.
ToensuretheconvergenceoftheresultsinFigs.1and2,we
present in Fig.3 a setof normalizedJp
mn correlation functions
ofthreerepresentativetemperaturesforbothisobars.Theresults
agreewithdataalreadyreportedinliterature[50].
Figs.4–6showthecomputedthermalconductivityvaluesand
theheatfluxcorrelationfunctionsofargon,asdonefortheshear
viscosity.TheresultsarealsoingoodagreementwiththeNISTdata.
Allparameterspairsleadtosimilarresultswithsmall
discrepan-ciesascomparedtotheaveragevalues.Theparameterpairfrom
Michelsetal.[25]displaysasmootherbehaviorincomparisonto
NISTdataandbetterrepresentedthecriticaldivergence.Theerror
barsaresmallerascomparedtotheshearviscosityones.InFig.6,
thisplotshowscorrelationsupto100psandthesimulations
con-sideredthecorrelationsupto200ps.
Finally,Figs.7–9collectsMDbulkviscosityresultsfor argon
andthesetofcorrelationfunctionsusedtocomputethem.Since
thesedataarenotavailableinNISTtables,theycanbeespecially
useful.Onceagain,allfourpairsofL-Jparametersleadtosimilar
results,butinthiscasetheL-JparametersfromWhite[29]showed
aclearlysmootherbehaviorandabetterdescriptionofthe
criti-caldivergence.Largedeviationswerefoundintheaveragevalueof
bulkviscosityresults.Thesedeviationsareconsiderablylargerthan
deviationsreportedforshearviscosityandthermalconductivity.
Moreover,Fig.9showsthatthediagonalstresstensorcorrelations
exhibitabetterconvergenceifcomparedtothermalconductivity
correlations.Thecorrelationanalysisofthebulkviscositysuggests
thatthis propertyiseasiertocomputeascomparedtothermal
conductivityevennearthecriticalpoint.
AnotherimportantfeatureinFigs.7and8isthenon-zerovalue
ofthebulkviscosityfarfromthecriticaltemperature.AtTr=2.0
(≈300K)thispropertyreachesvaluesaround30Paswithan
aver-agedeviationof±5Pasconsideringtheresultsobtainedfromall
setofL-Jparameters.Thisresultshowsthateventhoughargonis
amonoatomicgas,theStokeshypothesisaswellasthekineticgas
theoryassumptions[52]donotholdandthuscannotbeused.
Fur-thermore,thispropertyhasthesameorderofmagnitudeofthe
shearviscosityvaluesand,hence,cannotbeneglectedin
simula-tionsofthemomentumconservationequations.
Figs.7eand8ecomparebothviscositiesobtainedusing
aver-agesovertheMDresultsandthefoursetsofL-Jparametersateach
Trvalue.Theseresultsindicatethatbulkviscosityvaluesare
actu-allylargerthantheirshearcounterpartsforthethermodynamic
statesconsideredhere.Thisisanimportantfindingbecause
classi-calfluidmechanicsanalysisneglectsthebulkviscosity[53].From
thesefiguresweproposeanempiricalrelationbetweenboth
vis-cositiesateachisobar:oneshoulduseb≈1.3satthe1.0Pcisobar
andb≈1.6satthe1.2Pcisobar.Therefore,thetraditional
assump-tionofneglectingthisdifferencecannotbeaprioriassumedinthe
neighborhoodofthecriticalpoint.
5. Conclusions
Inthisworkitwasshownthatmoleculardynamicssimulations
usingtheLennard-Jonespotentialtodescribethepotentialenergy
betweenargonatomsallowonetoobtainaccuratevaluesofboth
shearviscosityandthermalconductivityalongisobarsinthe
neigh-borhoodofthecriticalpoint.Thecomputedpropertieswereingood
agreementwithexperimentaldatacollectedintheNISTdatabase.
Thisgoodagreementleadsustocomputealsothebulkviscosity
inthesamethermodynamicregioneventhoughNISTdataisnot
availableinthiscase.
Intheneighborhoodofthecriticalpoint,theresultsforbulk
vis-cosityobtainedwithmoleculardynamicsshowthat:(a)shearand
bulkviscositiesdivergealongthesameisobarwithsimilar
behav-ior;(b)bulkviscositydoesnotgotozeroawayfromthecritical
pointinspiteofbeingclosetoit,thuscontradictingStokes
hypoth-esisandkinetictheoryevenforamonoatomicdilutegas;(c)bulk
viscosityisnotonlyofthesameorderofmagnitudeasshear
viscos-itynearthecriticalpoint,butitisactuallylargerthanitscounterpart
inthisregion.
The present approach of usingmolecular dynamicsto
com-pute diffusionproperties of a fluid in the neighborhood of the
criticalpointisgeneralandwehaveshownthatcanbeusedto
complicatedandpracticalsystems(e.g.,N2).Investigationsalong
theselinesareunderwayinourgroup.
Thecompletesetofresultsforthetransportpropertiesis
avail-ableasanexcelfileintheSupplementarymaterialofthiswork.
Acknowledgements
L.S.deB.A.thanksBrazilianagenciesFAPERJ(throughgrants
E-26/110.846/2011and E-26/111.670/2012),CNPq (throughGrant
MCT/CNPq14-481072/2012-8)andCapes. I.B.and J.N.thankthe
sameagenciesforsupportofthisresearchaswelltheBrazilian
Army.L.S.deB.A.acknowledgesthefinancial supportfromthe
UnitedStatesAirForce(throughtheSOARDgrant
FA9550-13-1-0178). A.B.O. thanksCNPq(through Grants303820/2013-6 and
459852/2014-0)aswellaspartialfinancialsupportfrom
PROPP-UFOP(throughAuxílioaPesquisadores2015Grant).Wewouldlike
alsotothanktherefereesforthevaluablesuggestionsconcerning
dataanalysis.
AppendixA. Supplementarydata
Supplementarydataassociatedwiththisarticlecanbefound,
intheonlineversion,athttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2016.04.
004.
References
[1]P.K.Kundu,I.M.Cohen,D.R.Dowling,FluidMechanics,6thed.,Academic Press,London,2015.
[2]D.W.Hahn,M.N.Özisik,HeatConduction,3rded.,JohnWiley&Sons,New York,2012.
[3]NationalInstituteofStandardsandTechnologyThermophysicalPropertiesof FluidSystems,2011(Available:)http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/fluid/. [4]G.G.Stokes,Onthetheoriesofinternalfrictionoffluidsinmotion,Trans.
CambridgePhilos.Soc.8(1845)287–305.
[5]M.Gad-el-Hak,Stoke’shypothesisforanewtonian,isotropicfluid,J.Fluids Eng.117(1995)3–5.
[6]P.Carlès,Abriefreviewofthethermophysicalpropertiesofsupercritical fluids,J.Supercrit.Fluids53(2012)2–11.
[7]D.Beysens,J.Straub,D.Turner,Phasetransitionsandnear-critical phenomena,in:H.U.Walter(Ed.),FluidSciencesandMaterialsSciencein Space,Springer-Verlag,Berlin,1987,pp.221–256.
[8]H.E.Stanley,IntroductiontoPhaseTransitionsandCriticalPhenomena, OxfordUniversityPress,Oxford,1971.
[9]D.Bolmatov,V.V.Brazhkin,K.Trachenko,Thermodynamicbehaviourof supercriticalmatter,Nat.Commun.4(2013)2331.
[10]T.M.Yigzawe,R.J.Sadus,Intermolecularinteractionsandthethermodynamic propertiesofsupercriticalfluids,J.Chem.Phys.138(2013)194502.
[11]R.E.Graves,B.M.Argrow,Bulkviscosity:pasttopresent,J.Thermophys.Heat Transf.13(1999)337–342.
[12]J.A.Cowan,P.W.Ward,Ultrasonicattenuationandthebulkviscosityofliquid argonnearthecriticalpoint,Can.J.Phys.51(1973)2219–2224.
[13]X.He,H.Wei,J.Shi,J.Liu,S.Li,W.Chen,X.Mo,Experimentalmeasurementof bulkviscosityofwaterbasedonstimulatedBrillouinscattering,Opt. Commun.285(2012)4120–4124.
[14]S.B.Frenkel,B.Smit,UnderstandingMolecularSimulation,2nded.,Academic Press,SanDiego,2002.
[15]K.Binder,Computersimulationsofcriticalphenomenaandphasebehaviour offluids,Mol.Phys.108(2010)1797–1815.
[16]P.T.Cummings,Molecularsimulationofnear-criticalandsupercriticalfluids, in:E.Kiran,J.M.H.Levelt-Sengers(Eds.),SupercriticalFluids:Fundamentals andApplications,KluwerAcademicPublishers,Dordrecht,1994,pp.387–409.
[17]D.A.McQuarrie,StatisticalMechanics,UniversityScienceBooks,MillValley, 2000.
[18]J.Nichele,L.S.deB.Alves,I.BorgesJr.,EquationofStatefornearcriticalargon obtainedviamoleculardynamics,HighTemp.—HighPressures43(2014) 385–400.
[19]E.Martínez-Nú ˜nez,I.BorgesJr.,S.A.Vázquez,Associationrateconstantsfor theCH3+NO→CH3NOreactionbyclassicaltrajectoryandCVTST calculations,J.Phys.Org.Chem.15(2002)123–129.
[21]S.Roy,S.K.Das,Transportphenomenainfluids:finite-sizescalingforcritical behavior,Europhys.Lett.94(2011)36001.
[22]T.Hamanaka,R.Yamamoto,A.Onuki,Moleculardynamicssimulationofheat conductioninnear-criticalfluids,Phys.Rev.E71(2005)011507.
[23]O.C.Nwobi,L.N.Long,M.M.Micci,Moleculardynamicsstudiesoftransport propertiesofsupercriticalfluids,in:Proceedingsofthe35thAIAAAerospace SciencesMeeting&Exhibit,Reno-NV,1997,pp.1–11.
[24]R.L.Rowley,M.M.Painter,Diffusionandviscosityequationsofstatefora Lennard-Jonesfluidobtainedfrommoleculardynamicssimulations,Int.J. Thermophys.18(1997)1109–1121.
[25]A.Michels,H.Wijker,H.K.Wijker,Isothermsofargonbetween0◦Cand150◦C andpressuresupto2900atmospheres,Physica15(1949)627–633.
[26]J.H.M.Levelt,Thereducedequationofstate,internalenergyandentropyof argonandxenon,Physica26(1960)361–377.
[27]P.C.Teixeira,L.S.deB.Alves,Pistoneffectcharacteristictimedependenceon equationofstatemodelchoice,in:ProceedingsofCHT-12,ICHMTDigital Library,Bath,2012.
[28]L.S.deB.Alves,Anintegraltransformsolutionforunsteadycompressibleheat transferinfluidsneartheirthermodynamiccriticalpoint,Therm.Sci.17 (2013)673–686.
[29]J.A.White,Lennard-Jonesasamodelforargonandtestofextended renormalizationgroupcalculations,J.Chem.Phys.111(1999)9352–9356.
[30]J.Vrabec,J.Stoll,H.Hasse,Asetofmolecularmodelsforsymmetric quadrupolarfluids,J.Phys.Chem.B105(2001)12126–12133.
[31]R.Zwanzig,Time-correlationfunctionsandtransportcoefficientsinstatistical mechanics,Annu.Rev.Phys.Chem.16(1965)67–102.
[32]G.Galliéro,C.Boned,A.Baylaucq,Moleculardynamicsstudyofthe Lennard-Jonesfluidviscosity:applicationtorealfluids,Ind.Eng.Chem.Res. 44(2005)6963–6972.
[33]D.J.Evans,ThermalconductivityoftheLennard-Jonesfluid,Phys.Rev.A34 (1986)1449–1453.
[34]B.J.Bailey,K.Kellner,Thethermalconductivityofargonnearthecritical point,Br.J.Appl.Phys.18(1967)1645–1647.
[35]H.J.M.Hanley,R.D.McCarty,J.V.Sengers,Viscosityandthermalconductivity coefficientsofgaseousandliquidoxygen,in:NASACr-2440,Universityof Maryland,1974.
[36]B.A.Younglove,H.J.M.Hanley,Theviscosityandthermalconductivity coefficientsofgaseousandliquidargon,J.Phys.Chem.Ref.Data15(1986) 1323–1337.
[37]K.Meier,ComputerSimulationandInterpretationoftheTransport CoefficientsoftheLennard-JonesModelFluid,UniversityoftheFederal ArmedForcesHamburg,Hamburg,2002(Thesis).
[38]L.P.Kadanoff,J.Swift,Transportcoefficientsneartheliquid-Gascriticalpoint, Phys.Rev.166(1968)89–101.
[39]B.W.Tiesinga,E.P.Sakonidou,H.R.vanderBerg,Thethermalconductivityof argoninthecriticalregion,J.Chem.Phys.101(1994)6944–6963.
[40]A.E.Nasrabad,R.Laghaei,B.C.Eu,Moleculartheoryofthermalconductivityof theLennard-Jonesfluid,J.Chem.Phys.124(2006)084506.
[41]R.Vogelsand,C.Hoheisel,Thermalconductivityandshearviscosityofliquid andfluidargon.Anextendedcomparisonbetweenexperimentaland moleculardynamicsdata,Phys.Chem.Liq.18(1988)141–149.
[42]J.V.Sengers,J.G.Shanks,Experimentalcritical-exponentvaluesforfluids,J. Stat.Phys.137(2009)857–877.
[43]K.Meier,A.Laesecke,S.Kabelac,TransportcoefficientsoftheLennard-Jones modelfluid.III.Bulkviscosity,J.Chem.Phys.122(2005)014513.
[44]A.Onuki,Bulkviscositynearthecriticalpoint,J.Phys.Soc.Japan66(1997) 511–513.
[45]G.A.Fernández,J.Vrabec,H.Hasse,Amolecularsimulationstudyofshearand bulkviscosityandthermalconductivityofsimplerealfluids,FluidPhase Equilib.221(2004)157–163.
[46]M.S.Zabaloy,V.R.Vasquez,E.A.Macedo,Viscosityofpuresupercriticalfluids, J.Supercrit.Fluids36(2005)106–117.
[47]S.J.Plimpton,Fastparallelalgorithmsforshort-rangemoleculardynamics,J. Comput.Phys.117(1995)1–19.
[48]W.Shinoda,M.Shiga,M.Mikami,Rapidestimationofelasticconstantsby moleculardynamicssimulationunderconstantstress,Phys.Rev.B69(2004) 134103.
[49]V.V.Brazhkin,Y.D.Fomin,A.G.Lyapin,V.N.Ryzhov,E.N.Tsiok,Widomlinefor theliquid-GastransitioninLennard-Jonessystem,J.Phys.Chem.B115(2011) 14112–14115.
[50]K.Meier,A.Laesecke,S.Kabelac,TransportcoefficientsoftheLennard-Jones modelfluid.I.Viscosity,J.Chem.Phys.121(2004)3671–3687.
[51]F.Müller-Plathe,Asimplenonequilibiurmmoleculardynamicsmethodfor calculatingthethermalconductivity,J.Chem.Phys.106(1997)
6082–6085.
[52]W.G.Vincenti,C.H.Kruger,IntroductiontoPhysicalGasDynamics,Krieger, Malabar-FL,1965,pp.pp.407–412.
[53]R.B.Bird,W.E.Stewart,E.N.Lightfoot,TransportPhenomena,2nded.,John Wiley&Sons,NewYork,2002.