• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. paul. pediatr. vol.33 número3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. paul. pediatr. vol.33 número3"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texto

(1)

www.rpped.com.br

REVISTA

PAULISTA

DE

PEDIATRIA

ORIGINAL

ARTICLE

Usefulness

of

the

WHOQOL-BREF

questionnaire

in

assessing

the

quality

of

life

of

parents

of

children

with

asthma

Cristian

Roncada

a,∗

,

Caroline

Pieta

Dias

b

,

Suelen

Goecks

a

,

Simone

Elenise

Falcão

Cidade

a

,

Paulo

Márcio

Condessa

Pitrez

a

aPontifíciaUniversidadeCatólicadoRioGrandedoSul(PUCRS),PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil

bUniversidadeFederaldoRioGrandedoSul(UFRGS),PortoAlegre,RS,Brazil

Received31October2014;accepted23January2015 Availableonline27June2015

KEYWORDS Questionnaire; Qualityoflife; Asthma; Children; Adolescents; Caregivers

Abstract

Objective: Toevaluate the qualityof life(QOL) ofparentsofchildren with asthmaand to analyzetheinternalconsistencyofthegenericQOLtoolWorldHealthOrganizationQualityof Life,abbreviatedversion(WHOQOL-BREF).

Methods: WeevaluatedtheQOLofparentsofasthmaticandhealthychildrenagedbetween 8and16,usingthegenericWHOQOL-BREFquestionnaire.Wealsoevaluatedtheinternal con-sistencyusingCronbach’salpha(˛C),inordertodeterminewhetherthetoolhadgoodvalidity forthetargetaudience.

Results: Thestudyincluded162individualswithameanageof43.8±13.6years,ofwhich104 werefemale(64.2%)and128weremarried(79.0%).WhenassessingtheQOL,thegroupof par-entsofhealthychildrenhadhigherscoresthanthegroupofparentsofasthmaticchildreninthe fourareasevaluatedbythequestionnaire(Physical,PsychologicalHealth,SocialRelationships andEnvironment),indicatingabetterqualityoflife.Regardingtheinternalconsistencyofthe WHOQOL-BREF,valuesof˛Cwere0.86pointsforthegroupofparentsofasthmaticchildren, and0.88forthegroupofparentsofhealthychildren.

Conclusions: Parentsofchildrenwithasthmahaveimpairedqualityoflifeduetotheirchildren’s disease.Furthermore,theWHOQOL-BREF,evenasagenerictool,showedtobepracticaland efficienttoevaluatethequalityoflifeofparentsofasthmaticchildren.

© 2015 Sociedadede Pediatriade São Paulo. Publishedby Elsevier Editora Ltda. Allrights reserved.

DOIoforiginalarticle:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpped.2015.01.007

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:[email protected](C.Roncada).

(2)

PALAVRAS-CHAVE Questionário; Qualidadedevida; Asma;

Crianc¸as; Adolescentes; Cuidadores

ValordoempregodoquestionárioWHOQOL-BREFnaavaliac¸ãodaqualidadedevida

depaisdecrianc¸ascomasma

Resumo

Objetivo: Avaliaraqualidadedevida(QV)depaisdecrianc¸asasmáticaseanalisara consistên-ciainternadoinstrumentogenéricodequalidadedevidaWorldHealthOrganizationQualityof Life,versãoabreviada(WHOQOL-BREF).

Métodos: FoiavaliadaaQVdepaisdecrianc¸asasmáticasehígidasentreoito-16anos,pormeio doquestionáriogenéricoWHOQOL-BREF.Foiavaliadatambémaconsistênciainterna,pormeio doalfadeCronbach(˛C),paradeterminarseoinstrumentotemboavalidadeparaopúblico alvo.

Resultados: Participaramdoestudo162indivíduos,comidademédiade43,8±13,6anos,dos quais104eramdosexofeminino(64,2%)e128casados(79,0%).Naavaliac¸ãodonívelde quali-dadedevida,ogrupodepaisdecrianc¸assaudáveisapresentouescoresacimadogrupodepais deasmáticosnosquatrodomíniosdoinstrumento(físico,psicológico,socialemeioambiente) queindicammelhorqualidadedevida. Naanálisedeconsistênciainterna,oWHOQOL-BREF obtevevaloresde˛C=0,86pontosparaogrupodepaisdeasmáticose0,88paraogrupode paisdehígidos.

Conclusões: Paisdecrianc¸asasmáticasapresentamcomprometimentodaqualidadedevidaem func¸ãodadoenc¸adeseusfilhos.Alémdisso,oWHOQOL-BREF,mesmosendouminstrumento genérico,semostroupráticoeeficienteparaavaliaraqualidadedevidadepaisdecrianc¸as asmáticas.

© 2015SociedadedePediatria de SãoPaulo. Publicado porElsevier EditoraLtda. Todosos direitosreservados.

Introduction

Asthma is a chronic disease with high prevalence in childhood,1 which requires coordinated efforts between

children,familiesandhealthprofessionalsforitscontroland treatment.2The diseasetreatmentinvolves

pharmacologi-calandbehavioralrecommendationstopreventandcontrol itsexacerbations; however, asthma management is made difficultbythepatientsandtheircaregivers,whooftendo notadheretotheprescribedrecommendations.3Oneofthe

factorsfor poor adherencetotreatment is relatedtothe inadequateknowledgeofcaregiversonpreventive medica-tionsforthedisease.4Inturn,non-adherencetotreatment

results in lack of control, generating many complications inchildrenandtheircaregivers,resultinginadecreasein qualityoflifeforboth.3

Therefore, taking care of children with asthma has a significantimpactonthe familymembers.5 The burdenof

caringforachronicallyillchildisassociatedwithparents’ healthdeterioration,leadingtoadverse health outcomes, suchasemotional stressanddepression.6Allergicdiseases

consistofa varietyofdisordersthathave different symp-toms,leadingtoamultifacetedimpactonmanyaspectsof familylife.7 Inthissense,childrenwithasthmacansuffer

an impact onquestions related toeducation, sleep qual-ity, physical limitations, symptom control and behavioral ordevelopmentproblems.8Parentscanalsohaveproblems

maintainingnormalfamilyanddailylifefunctions,resulting inadecreaseinqualityoflife.9

Althoughseveraltoolshavebeendevelopedtomeasure theburdenortheimpactfeltbyparentswhencaringfor chil-drenwithchronicdiseases,nospecifictoolwasdeveloped

tomeasurethequalityoflifeofparentsthatprovidehealth caretochildrenwithasthmainBrazil.10 Theexistingtools

aregenericquestionnairesassessingthequalityoflifeinthe generalcontext,regardlessofhowthediseaseaffectsthe familycontext.11 Currently,themostoftenused

question-naireinstudiesinvolving qualityoflifeinchronicdiseases istheonebytheWorldHealthOrganization (WorldHealth OrganizationQualityofLife---WHOQOL),whichisusefulin epidemiologicalstudiesorclinicaltrials,aswellasto eval-uatetheeffectivenessoftreatmentsanddiseasecontrol.12

Becauseasthmaisadiseasewithhighprevalencein child-hood, which leads to complications for both children and familymembers,thepresentstudyhadtheprimary objec-tive ofevaluating thequalityof life ofparents caringfor childrenwithasthmafollowed atan outpatientclinic ofa referencecenterinsouthernBrazil.Asthereisnospecific toolforassessingthequalityoflifeofcaregiversofchildren withasthma,thesecondaryobjectivewastoevaluatethe internalconsistencyoftheWorldHealthOrganization Qual-ityofLife---shortversion(WHOQOL-BREF)toensurethatitis validforthestudygroup.

Method

(3)

Table1 Samplecharacterization.

Parentsofasthmaticchildren(n=54) Parentsofhealthychildren(n=108)

Age(mean±SD) 42.9±13.4 44.7±13.8

Female 38(70.3) 66(61.1%)

Married 41(75.9%) 87(80.5%)

Elementaryschool 39(72.2%) 72(66.6%)

Unemployed 6(11.1%) 5(4.6%)

SD,standarddeviation.

exclusioncriteria,theparentsinbothgroupscouldnothave adiagnosisofasthmaoranyotherchronicdiseasethatcould interferewiththestudyresults.Additionally,patientscould not have any other chronic diseases that might interfere withtheevaluationoftheWHOQOL-BREF.Fordataanalysis, thegroupsweredividedinto(Parentsofasthmaticchildren) and(Parentsof healthychildren). Forsample calculation, taking into account the population being followed at the reference center, assuming a 95% confidence level and a standard margin of error of 5%, it would be necessary to assess 48 parentsand/or caregivers of asthmaticchildren forthestudy.Inaddition,weadoptedthecriterionoftwo participantsinthehealthygroupforeachparticipantinthe asthmaticgroup.

To assess the qualityof life we used theWorld Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF tool,13 which consists of 26

questionswithstructuredresponsesonaLikertscaleoffive points.Thequestionnairewasself-administered,according totheperceptionofthelasttwoweeks.Ofthe26questions, twoassesstheperceptionofqualityoflifeandhealthofthe patient,andtheothers(24questions)comprisethephysical, psychological,socialandenvironmentdomains.Inaddition totheWHOQOL-BREF,ageneralquestionnairewasapplied tocharacterizethesample,consistingoftenquestions.

Thestudiedpsychometricpropertywastheinternal con-sistencybyCronbach’salpha(˛-C),14whichassesseswhether

a toolis capableof always measuringwhatis tobe mea-sured in the same way, producing an average correlation betweenquestionsandresponses.Thus,the˛Ccoefficient

iscalculatedfromthevarianceoftheindividualitemsand thevarianceofthesumbetweenitems,byverifyingwhether allofthemusethesamemeasuringscale.Valueswere con-sideredacceptablefor˛-Cscores>0.70and<0.95.

ThestudywasapprovedbytheInstitutionalReviewBoard ofthePontifíciaUniversidadeCatólicadoRioGrandedoSul (PUCRS)underthenumber11/05602.Moreover,all partici-pantsreceivedandsignedtheinformedconsentform(ICF), agreeingtoparticipateinthestudy.

StatisticalanalysiswasperformedusingIBMSPSS Statis-tics v.20 software (International Business Machines ---Statistical Productand Service Solutions,New York, USA). For descriptive analysis, categorical data were described as absolute and relative frequencies. The description of continuousvariableswasrepresentedbymeanandstandard deviation(SD).Associationsbetweentheoutcomevariables andbetweengroupsofschoolchildren(parentsof asthmat-icsand parents ofhealthy children)were evaluatedusing mixedlinearmodels.Forpurposesofpsychometricanalysis, Cronbach’salphatests(˛C)14andtheintraclasscorrelation

coefficient(ICC)wereapplied.15 Thesignificancelevelwas

setatp<0.05.

Results

The study included 162 subjects,54 parents of asthmatic and108 parents of healthy children, witha mean age of 43.8±13.6years.Ofthese,104werefemales(64.2%),111 withpredominantlyelementaryeducation(68.5%),and128 with a current marital status of ‘married’ (79.0%). The comparisonofthegeneralcharacteristicsofparentsof asth-maticsandparentsofhealthychildrenisshowninTable1.

Whencomparingthequalityoflifelevelbetweenthetwo groups(Table2andFig.1),thegroupofparentsofhealthy childrenhadhigherscoresthanthegroupofparentsof asth-matic children in the four domains of the questionnaire, aswell as for the health perception and thetotal score. Therewerenodifferencesbetweenthegroupsonlyforthe questionaboutthequalityoflifeperception.

Forinternalconsistency,the˛Cwasappliedtoboththe

totalscore(26items)andthescoreperitem(Table3).In theanalysisofthetotalscore,thetoolobtainedavalueof

˛C=0.86pointsfor thegroupofparentsof asthmaticsand

0.88forthegroupofparentsofhealthychildren.These val-uesshowastronginternalconsistencybothbetweenitems andinthetotal,asscores<0.70areconsideredhighly rel-evant.Forcorrelation purposes, theintraclass correlation coefficient(ICC)wasapplied,yieldingvaluesof0.85points (p<0.001)for thegroup ofparents ofasthmaticsand0.88 (p<0.001)forthegroupofparentsofhealthychildren,with a95%confidenceinterval(95%CI:0.79---0.90and0.87---0.89, respectively).

Discussion

The assessment of qualityof life hastaken ona keyrole inthe clinical area,regarding the individualor collective perceptionofpatientswithcertainchronicdiseases,which theycanmaintainsomewhatundercontroldueto therapeu-ticadvances.The factthatpatientsbenefitfromsurvival, sometimesforlong periods,doesnotmean‘‘livingwell’’, asthereareoftenlimitations,withlossesinseveral activ-ities of daily living. However, this fact goes far beyond patientlimitations,asinthecaseofchildrendiagnosedwith asthma,inwhichparentsorguardiansendupbeingdirectly affectedbythedisease.

(4)

Table2 Comparisonoflevelsofqualityoflifebetweengroupsofparentsofasthmaticandhealthychildrenusingthe WHOQOL-BREFquestionnaire,assessedinPortoAlegre,RS,inthe2013/2014period.Datashownasmean±SD.

Parentsofasthmaticchildren(n=54) Parentsofhealthychildren(n=108) DF p-value

Mean SD Mean SD

Domain1---Physical 63.03 ±15.35 69.64 ±12.10 −6.61 0.005a

Domain2---Psychological 63.66 ±13.35 69.56 ±9.45 −5.90 0.005a

Domain3---Social 63.74 ±15.87 76.39 ±12.76 −12.65 <0.001a

Domain4---Environmental 55.38 ±13.20 64.47 ±9.29 −9.08 <0.001a

Perceptionofqualityoflife 69.91 ±13.19 73.15 ±14.78 −3.24 0.100

Perceptionofhealth 62.50 ±19.87 70.60 ±17.37 −8.10 0.007a

Totalscoreofdomains 61.68 ±10.64 70.6s3 ±8.62 −8.95 <0.001a

DF,differencebetweengroups;SD,standarddeviation.

healthychildren’scaregivers.UsingtheWHOQOL-BREFtool, one can observe that in the four central domains of the study (physical, psychological, social and environmental), caregiversofasthmaticchildrenshowedsignificantlylower values,inadditiontotheirownperceptionofhealth,when comparedwith the group of parents of healthy children. Furthermore, with the secondary objective of evaluating theinternalconsistency,thetoolshowedvaluesabovethe meanofqualityof lifetools,11 demonstratingthat it

con-ciselymeasures the answers. Using the same instrument, Crespoetal.16investigatedtheimpactofthediseaseon97

caregiversofchildrenwithasthma.Theauthorsconcluded thatthefamilyfactorsarekeycomponentsto understand-ingthequalityoflifenotonlyofchildrenwiththedisease butalsooftheircaregivers.Amongthefamilyfactors, fam-ily resources were analyzed (material and assistance), as wellasfamilychallenges(futureperspectives).Suchfactors are potentially modifiable, and can be included in prac-ticalinterventions aimingat improving the qualityof life of family members.17 The family resources were

identi-fiedasthepositiveaspects ofthe family,thatis, parents and children perceiving a consistent family environment,

facilitatingcommunication andtheexpressionof thoughts andfeelings. Familychallengesrefer totheburden expe-rienced by the caregiver, regarding the negative impact thediseasecanbringtothefamilyenvironment.18,19 These

two factors are usually affected, because caregivers can rarely maintain a stableprofessional life, asthey usually need to meet the additional demands generated by the disease.20

Recently,Silvaetal.21publishedastudyassociatingthe

high levels of care burden to impaired quality of life of parents of asthmatic children. A total of 180 parents of asthmaticchildren(aged8---18years)wereevaluated,who reported their experience regarding care of the disease, theuseofpositivereformulationincopingandtheirquality oflife.Theauthorssuggestthatpsychologicalinterventions focused on the recognition and appreciation of care, together with the positive revaluation of the stressful situation, can support the coping strategies and improve theparents’qualityoflife.However,dissimilarlyfromthe present study, significant values were only found for thesocialdomain.Accordingtoother studies,22---25 parents

of children with chronic diseases, such as asthma, keep

Physical Social

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Psychological Environment QoL

perception

Perception of health

Score between domains

**

p<0.001

*

p<0.050

*

*

*

*

**

**

Quality of life (QoL)

Parents of healthy children Parents of asthmatics

(5)

Table3 Assessment ofinternal consistency ofthe items (WHOQOL-BREF questionnairequestions) using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient(˛C)appliedtogroupsofparentsofasthmaticandparentsofhealthychildren.

˛Casthmatics ˛Chealthy

1.Howwouldyourateyourqualityoflife? 0.85 0.88

2.Howsatisfiedareyouwithyourhealth? 0.85 0.87

3.Towhatextentdoyoufeelthatphysicalpainpreventsyou fromdoingwhatyouneedtodo?

0.85 0.88

4.Howmuchdoyouneedmedicaltreatmenttofunctionin yourdailylife?

0.86 0.88

5.Howmuchdoyouenjoylife? 0.85 0.88

6.Towhatextentdoyoufeelyourlifeto bemeaningful?

0.85 0.88

7.Howwellareyouabletoconcentrate? 0.85 0.88

8.Howsafedoyoufeelinyourdailylife? 0.85 0.87

9.Howhealthyisyourphysicalenvironment(climate,noise, pollution,appeals)?

0.86 0.88

10.Doyouhaveenoughenergyforeverydaylife? 0.85 0.87

11.Areyouabletoacceptyourphysicalappearance? 0.86 0.87

12.Doyouhaveyouenoughmoneytomeetyourneeds? 0.85 0.88

13.Howavailabletoyouistheinformationthatyouneedin yourday-to-daylife?

0.85 0.88

14.Towhatextentdoyouhavetheopportunityforleisure activities?

0.84 0.88

15.Howwellareyouabletogetaround? 0.85 0.87

16.Howsatisfiedareyouwithyoursleep? 0.84 0.88

17.Howsatisfiedareyouwithyourabilitytoperformyour dailylivingactivities?

0.84 0.87

18.Howsatisfiedareyouwithyourcapacityforwork? 0.85 0.87

19.Howsatisfiedareyouwithyourself? 0.84 0.87

20.Howsatisfiedareyouwithyourpersonalrelationships? 0.84 0.87

21.Howsatisfiedareyouwithyoursexlife? 0.85 0.87

22.Howsatisfiedareyouwiththesupportyougetfromyour friends?

0.85 0.88

23.Howsatisfiedareyouwiththeconditionsofyourliving place?

0.85 0.87

24.Howsatisfiedareyouwithyouraccesstohealthservices? 0.85 0.88

25.Howsatisfiedareyouwithyourtransportation? 0.85 0.88

26.Howoftendoyouhavenegativefeelingssuchasbad mood,anxiety,anddepression?

0.84 0.88

˛C,Cronbach’salpha;Asthmatics,Groupofparentsofchildrenwithasthma;Healthychildren,Groupofparentsofhealthychildren.

closersocialrelationships,usedasabasis forsupportand skillstocopewiththedisease.

Gauetal.26 developedastudytovalidatethe

WHOQOL-BREFquestionnaireappliedto229 caregiversofasthmatic childreninTaiwan.Inthisstudy,thevalueofCronbach’s˛

rangedfrom0.64to0.84,valuesthatarelowerthanthose foundin thepresentstudy (0.84to0.86).As aresult,the authorsdemonstratedthatphysicalhealthandpsychological healtharethetwoareasthathaveanimpactonthequality oflifeofthispopulation.26Inthepresentstudy,thevalues

weredifferent for the fourdomains(physical, emotional, socialandenvironmental),inadditiontotheperceptionof healthcategory.Theauthorsstatethatthephysicalstrength levelsarelowduetosleepinterruption,lossofenergyand somaticcomplaints,influencingnotonlythephysicalhealth perception, but also the negative feelings that, in turn, directlyinterferewiththeperceptionofthepsychological

domain.Additionally,environmentalfactors,including pol-lution,noise,trafficandweather,alsoaffectthequalityof lifeof mothersand theirchildren in Taiwan. Finally, they concludedthatthetoolusedinthestudywasvalidand reli-ableforassessingthequalityoflifeofcaregiversofchildren withasthma.26

Moreiraetal.27 comparedthequalityof lifeofparents

(6)

exception of asthma, asthe valuesshowed low variation inqualityoflifescoresrelatedtothedisease.Theauthors concludedthe study by reinforcingthat pediatricians not only should evaluate children with chronic diseases, but alsoevaluate or refer to follow-up the parents with psy-chosocial difficulties that might interfere withthe health andwell-beingoftheirchildren.

Asthemainlimitationofthestudy,wepointoutthelack ofaspecifictooltoassessthequalityoflifeofparentsof childrenwithasthmainPortuguese(BrazilianPortuguese). Since2011,thereisaspecialtooltoassessthequalityoflife ofcaregiversof childrenwithasthma,called Cuestionario de Impacto Familiar del Asma Bronquial Infantil (IFABI-R).28 The IFABI-R questionnaire consists of three domains

(functional,emotionalandsocio-occupational)andhasgood psychometricanalysis,butitisappliedtotheSpanishpublic. InordertoapplyittoBraziliancaregivers, priorlinguistic and cultural validation would be required. It is notewor-thy that, even if the WHOQOL-BREF has been shown to havehighinternalconsistency,theitemsarenotspecificfor asthma.

Thisstudyshowedthatasthmacancompromisethe qual-ity of life of parents of asthmatic children, who end up sufferingtheimpactofthediseasemorbidity.Regardingthe tool used to assess quality of life, it is possible to state thatitcanbesafely andeffectivelyappliedtoparentsof childrenwithasthma,aslongasitsinternalconsistencyis analyzed.

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tec-nológico(CNPq),E\ by way of a starting grant.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

References

1.SoléD,Camelo-NunesIC,WandalsenGF,MalloziMC.Asthmain childrenandadolescentsinBrazil:contributionofthe Interna-tionalStudyofAsthmaandAllergiesinChildhood(ISAAC).Rev PaulPediatr.2014;32:114---25.

2.PedersenSE,HurdSS,LemanskeRF,etal.Globalstrategyfor thediagnosisand managementofasthmainchildren5years andyounger.PediatrPulmonol.2011;46:1---17.

3.LimaGR,SilvaEV,NóbregaO,NavesJO.Seguimentodas

dire-trizesterapêuticaseadesãoàfarmacoterapianotratamentoda

asma.BrasiliaMed[serialontheInternet].2014;50.Available

from:

http://www.ambr.org.br/seguimento-das-diretrizes- terapeuticas-e-adesao-a-farmacoterapia-no-tratamento-da-asma-2/4[accessed1.12.2014].

4.AnandanC,NurmatovU,vanSchayckOC,SheikhA.Isthe preva-lenceofasthmadeclining?Systematicreviewofepidemiological studies.Allergy.2010;65:152---67.

5.SossaiP,TravaglioneAM,AmentaF.Asthma:opinionorevidence basedmedicine.JCDR.2014;4:17---22.

6.MoormanJE, ZahranH,TrumanBI,MollaMT,Centersfor Dis-easeControlandPrevention(CDC).Currentasthmaprevalence

--- United States, 2006---2008. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2011;60 Suppl.:84---6.

7.SorianoJB,CamposHdS.Epidemiologyofasthma.PulmãoRJ. 2012;21:3---10.

8.Samoli´nskiB,FronczakA,KunaP,etal.Preventionandcontrol ofchildhoodasthmaandallergyintheEUfromthepublichealth pointofview:PolishpresidencyoftheEuropeanUnion.Allergy. 2012;67:726---31.

9.GazzottiMR,NascimentoOA,MontealegreF,FishJ,JardimJR. Levelof asthmacontrol and itsimpactonactivities ofdaily livinginasthmapatientsinBrazil.JBrasPneumol.2013;39: 532---8.

10.PerosaGB,AmatoIdeA,RugoloLM,FerrariGF,deOliveiraMC. Qualityoflifeofasthmaticchildrenandadolescents:relation tomaternalcoping.RevPaulPediatr.2013;31:145---51. 11.RoncadaC,MattielloR, PitrezPM,SarriaEE.Specific

instru-mentstoassessqualityoflifeinchildrenandadolescentswith asthma.JPediatr(RioJ).2013;89:217---25.

12.PintoJM,ArenillasJI,MartínNoguerasAM,RamosGonzálezJ, GómezGómezFP.Thequalityoflifeofasthmaticpatients eval-uatedbytheWHOQOL-BREFandtheSGRQ.Fisioterapia(Madr). 2010;32:116---22.

13.FleckM, LouzadaS,Xavier M, etal. Applicationofthe Por-tugueseversion oftheabbreviated instrumentofqualitylife WHOQOL-bref.RevSaúdePúb.2000;34:178---83.

14.CronbachLJ. Coefficientalpha and theinternalstructure of tests.Psychometrika.1951;16:297---334.

15.Laureano GH. Coeficiente de correlac¸ão intraclasse: comparac¸ãoentremétodosdeestimac¸ãoclássicoebayesianos [monografia].PortoAlegre,RS:UFRGS;2011.

16.CrespoC,CaronaC,SilvaN,CanavarroMC,DattilioF. Under-standingthequalityoflifeforparentsandtheirchildrenwho haveasthma:familyresourcesandchallenges.ContempFam Ther.2011;33:179---96.

17.SatoAF,KopelSJ,McQuaidEL,etal.Thehomeenvironment andfamilyasthmamanagementamongethnicallydiverseurban youthwithasthma.FamSystHealth.2013;31:156---70. 18.Santos S, Crespo C, Silva N, Canavarro MC. Quality of life

and adjustment in youths with asthma: the contributions of family rituals and the family environment. Fam Process. 2012;51:557---69.

19. SilvaN,CrespoC,CaronaC,BullingerM,CanavarroM.Whythe (dis)agreement?Familycontextandchild---parentperspectives on health-related quality oflife and psychological problems in paediatric asthma. Child Care Health Dev. [Epub 2014 May5].

20.FieseBH,RhodesHG,BeardsleeWR.Rapidchangesin Amer-icanfamily life:consequencesfor childhealth and pediatric practice.Pediatrics.2013;132:552---9.

21.SilvaN,CaronaC,CrespoC,CanavarroMC.Parentalpositive meaning-makingwhencaregivingforchildrenwithasthma. Psi-cologia,Saude&Doenc¸as.2014;15:155---69.

22.WinterMA, Fiese BH,Spagnola M,Anbar RD. Asthma sever-ity, child security, and child internalizing: using story stem techniquestoassessthemeaningchildrengivetofamilyand disease-specificevents.JFamPsych.2011;25:857---67. 23.Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Ferrie PJ, Griffith LE,

TownsendM.Measuringqualityoflifeintheparentsofchildren withasthma.QualLifeRes.1996;5:27---34.

24.Font-Ribera L, Villanueva CM, Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, Zock JP, KogevinasM,HendersonJ.Swimmingpoolattendance,asthma, allergies, and lung function in the Avon Longitudinal Study ofParents and Children cohort.Am JRespir CritCare Med. 2011;183:582---8.

(7)

26.GauBS, ChenYC, Lo LH, et al. Clinicalapplicability of the WorldHealthOrganizationQuality ofLifeScaleBriefVersion (WHOQOL-BREF)tomothersofchildrenwithasthmainTaiwan. JClinNurs.2010;19:811---9.

27.Moreira H, Carona C, Silva N, Frontini R, Bullinger M, CanavarroMC. Psychological and quality oflife outcomes in

pediatric populations: a parent---childperspective. JPediatr. 2013;163:1471---8.

Imagem

Table 1 Sample characterization.
Figure 1 Quality of life assessment using the WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire.
Table 3 Assessment of internal consistency of the items (WHOQOL-BREF questionnaire questions) using Cronbach’s alpha coefficient ( ˛ C) applied to groups of parents of asthmatic and parents of healthy children.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Ousasse apontar algumas hipóteses para a solução desse problema público a partir do exposto dos autores usados como base para fundamentação teórica, da análise dos dados

(1984) analisando povoamentos de Eucalyptus saligna, aos 8 e 9 anos de idade, respectivamente, verificaram que em média 85% da biomassa aérea encontrava- se no fuste (madeira

i) A condutividade da matriz vítrea diminui com o aumento do tempo de tratamento térmico (Fig.. 241 pequena quantidade de cristais existentes na amostra já provoca um efeito

Portanto, a pesquisa cumpriu com seus objetivos de identificar o perfil sócio demográfico e sócio empresarial da amostra, verificar possível incidência das dimensões de

didático e resolva as ​listas de exercícios (disponíveis no ​Classroom​) referentes às obras de Carlos Drummond de Andrade, João Guimarães Rosa, Machado de Assis,

A última pergunta pede para que eles falem um pouco sobre as influências do Facebook no processos de ensino aprendizagens na escola e disciplina em que lecionam, e 11 responderam que

Por meio de relatórios gerenciais que permitem em tempo real avaliar passo a passo o planejamento estratégico, bem como se existe algum desvio padrão, que possa ser

Material e Método Foram entrevistadas 413 pessoas do Município de Santa Maria, Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, sobre o consumo de medicamentos no último mês.. Resultados