w w w . e l s e v ie r . c o m / l o c a t e / b j i d
The
Brazilian
Journal
of
INFECTIOUS
DISEASES
Original
article
Retrospective
evaluation
of
the
clinical
characteristics
associated
with
Corynebacterium
species
bacteremia
Mitsuru
Yanai
a,∗,
Maiko
Ogasawasa
a,
Yuta
Hayashi
a,
Kiyozumi
Suzuki
a,
Hiromichi
Takahashi
b,
Atsushi
Satomura
baNihonUniversitySchoolofMedicine,DepartmentofInternalMedicine,DivisionofGeneralMedicine,Tokyo,Japan
bNihonUniversitySchoolofMedicine,DepartmentofPathologyandMircobiology,DivisionofLaboratoryMedicine,Tokyo,Japan
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received15September2017
Accepted21December2017
Availableonline19January2018
Keywords: Corynebacteriumspecies Bloodculture Bloodstreaminfection Contamination
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Objectives:Corynebacterium spp.are becomingrecognized as pathogens that potentially
causevariousinfections.Weaimedtoevaluatetheclinicalcharacteristicsassociatedwith
Corynebacteriumspp.bacteremia.
Patientsandmethods: Weretrospectivelyreviewedthemedicalrecordsofalladultpatients
whohadpositivebloodculturesforCorynebacteriumspp.inasingleuniversityhospital
betweenJanuary2014andDecember2016.Patientsweredividedintoabacteremiagroup
andacontaminationgroupbasedonmicrobiologicaltestresultsandclinical
characteris-tics.Patients’characteristics,antimicrobialsusceptibilityofisolatedspecies,antimicrobials
administered,andpatientoutcomeswereevaluated.
Results:Corynebacteriumspp.wereisolatedfrombloodsamplesof63patients; Corynebac-teriumstriatumwasthepredominantisolate.Twenty-eightpatientsweredeterminedtohave
bacteremia.Youngerage(p=0.023),shortertimetopositivity(p=0.006),longerhospitalstay
(p=0.009),andpresenceofanindwellingvascularcatheter(p=0.002)wereobservedmore
ofteninthebacteremiagroupcomparedtothecontaminationgroup.Thesourceofinfection
inmostpatientswithbacteremiawasanintravenouscatheter.Alltestedstrainswere
sus-ceptibletovancomycin.Fourofthe27patientswithbacteremiadied,despiteadministration
ofappropriateantimicrobialtherapy.
Conclusions:We foundthatyounger age,shortertime to positivity,and presence ofan
indwellingcatheterwererelatedtobacteremiacausedbyCorynebacteriumspp.
Appropri-ateantimicrobialsshouldbeadministeredonceCorynebacteriumspp.areisolatedfromthe
bloodandbacteremiaissuspected.
©2018SociedadeBrasileiradeInfectologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisisan
openaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/
by-nc-nd/4.0/).
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mailaddress:yanai.mitsuru@nihon-u.ac.jp(M.Yanai).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2017.12.002
1413-8670/©2018SociedadeBrasileiradeInfectologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC
Introduction
ExceptforCorynebacteriumdiphtheriae,allCorynebacteriumspp.
are ubiquitous skin commensals and are usually
consid-ered to be blood culture contaminants.1 However, some
reportshavehighlighted the importanceofC.striatum and
C.jeikeium ascauses ofcatheter-related bloodstream
infec-tions in immunocompromised patients, and as causes of
various infections in immunocompetent patients, such as
arthritis and endocarditis.2–5 It is difficult to distinguish
contamination from bacteremia whenCorynebacterium spp.
orcoagulase-negativestaphylococciare isolatedfromblood
samples.6–9Inclinicalpractice,itisimportanttodistinguish
contaminationfrombacteremiatopreventunnecessary
pre-scriptionofantimicrobialagents,whichcanleadtoselection
ofantimicrobial-resistantorganisms,longerdurationof
hos-pitalization,andincreasedcosts.10
TherearefewstudiesonCorynebacteriumspp.infection,and
theclinicalsignificanceoftheseorganismsremainsunclear.
Thus,inthisstudy,weaimedtoevaluatetheclinical
charac-teristicsofbloodstreaminfectionscausedbyCorynebacterium
spp.byanalyzingclinicalcasesofbloodculturespositivefor
Corynebacteriumspp.
Patients
and
methods
Patientselectionandstudyperiod
ThisretrospectivecohortstudywasconductedattheNihon
UniversityItabashiHospital(NUIH),a1037-bedteaching
hos-pital.Thecatchmentarea ofNUIH encompassesthe north
partofTokyo,Japan.Wereviewedthemedicalrecordsofall
patientsaged>18yearswhohadpositivebloodcultureresults
forCorynebacteriumspp.betweenJanuary2014andDecember
2016.Onlythefirstepisodewasconsideredincaseofmultiple
episodeswithina4-weekperiod.
Definitions
Blood specimenswere cultured using a set ofculture
bot-tles(BACTEC92Fand 93F;BDDiagnosticSystems, Franklin
Lakes,NJ,USA)and automated systems(BACTEC9240and
9120;BDDiagnosticSystems)withcontinuousagitationwere
used.Bacterialspecieswereidentifiedthroughseveral
meth-ods,including assessmentofmorphologic appearance and
colonies,andassessmentofbiochemicalcharacteristicsusing
manualproceduresorcommercialkits(APIseries;bioMérieux,
Marcyl’Etoile,FranceandN-IDtestSP-18;Nissui
Pharmaceu-ticalCo.,Ltd., Tokyo, Japan)oran automatedidentification
system (RAISUS system, Nissui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.).
Antimicrobialsusceptibility tests were performed by broth
microdilution using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards
Institute’sbreakpoints.11
Patientswerecategorizedashavingbacteremiaifatleast
twobloodculturesetstakenatthesametimeturnedout
pos-itiveforthe same Corynebacteriumspp., orwhen oneblood
culturespecimenandanotherclinicallyrelevantsampletaken
from another site (such as acatheter tip, sputum,or pus)
yieldedpositiveresults.Ifonlyonesetofbloodculturesturned
out positiveand culturespecimenstaken from other sites
werenegative,orifanotherinfectionwasmorelikelyatthe
time,thecasewasdeemedtobecontamination.Thefinal
deci-sionofbacteremiaorcontaminationwasdeterminedbythe
authors,whichincludescertifiedinfectiousdiseases
special-istsontheantimicrobialstewardshipprogramteam.
Evaluatedparameters
We reviewed the medical records to extract data on each
patient’sbackground(age,sex,underlyingdisease,body
tem-perature,clinicaldepartment,presenceofavascularcatheter,
laboratory data), clinical course (response to antimicrobial
therapy),andoutcome.Inaddition,weanalyzed
microbiolog-icaldata,includingtimefromadmissiontocollectionofblood
culturesamplesandtimetopositivity;antimicrobial
suscep-tibilitytestresults;andisolationofbacteriafromsitesother
thanblood.
Statisticalanalysis
Continuousdatawereexpressedasthemedianand
interquar-tile range (IQR), and categorical variables as percentages
or absolute values. Statistical significance was calculated
using the chi-square test for categorical variables and the
Mann–WhitneyUtestforcontinuousvariables.Ap-value<0.05
was considered statisticallysignificant. Statistical analyses
were performedusingStatMateVsoftware(ATMSCo.,Ltd.,
Tokyo,Japan).
Ethicalconsiderations
TheClinicalResearchJudgingCommitteeatNUIHapproved
thestudyprotocolandwaivedtheneedforinformedconsent
giventheretrospectivenatureofthestudy.
Results
Duringthestudyperiod,66patientshadpositiveblood
cul-turesforCorynebacteriumspp.Threepatientswereexcluded
because of a second episode of serial infection. Of the
remaining63patients,28(44%)metthecriteriaforbacteremia
and 35 (56%) met the criteria for contamination. Patients’
baselinecharacteristicsaresummarizedinTable1.The
over-all medianagewas73years,and thecontaminationgroup
wassignificantlyolderthanthebacteremiagroup(p=0.023).
Menconstituted74.6%ofcases.Fourteencaseswere
identi-fiedintheemergencydepartmentandcriticalcaremedicine;
thisdepartmenthadasignificantlyhigherproportionof
con-taminationcasesthandidtheotherdepartments(p=0.049).
Overall,39patientshadacentralvenouscatheterinplace,five
hadaperipheralvenouscatheterinplace,and19didnothave
avenouscatheter;bacteremiawasdiagnosedmorefrequently
in patients who had peripheral or central venous inserted
catheters(p=0.002).Themedianintervalfromadmissionto
bloodculturesamplingwas25days(IQR,6–49);thisinterval
wassignificantlylongerinthebacteremiagroupthaninthe
contaminationgroup(p=0.006).Themediantimetoculture
Table1–CharacteristicsofpatientswithbacteremiaorbloodculturecontaminationwithCorynebacteriumspp.
Total Bacteremia Contamination p-value
Numberofcases,n(%) 63 28 35
Age(years),median(IQR) 73(62.0–81.5) 65.5(57.3–77.0) 75(70.0–83.0) 0.023
Male:femaleratio 47:16 22:6 25:10 0.517
Department,n(%)
Emergencyandcriticalcaremedicine 14(22) 3(11) 11(31) 0.049
Gastrointestinalmedicine 8(13) 4(14) 4(11)
Hematologyandrheumatology 8(13) 6(21) 2(6)
Cardiovascularsurgery 7(11) 5(18) 2(6) Nephrology 5(8) 4(14) 1(3) Cardiovascularmedicine 5(8) 2(7) 3(9) Digestivesurgery 4(6) 2(7) 2(6) Generalmedicine 3(5) 0(07) 3(9) Othera 9(14) 2(7) 7(20) Underlyingdiseases,n Malignancy 22 13 9 0.086 DM 6 4 2 0.249
ESRDondialysistherapy 12 8 4 0.085
LC 3 2 1 0.427
Vascularcatheterplacement,n(%)
CVcatheter 39(62) 21(75) 18(51)
Peripheralcatheter 5(8) 4(14) 1(3)
Nocatheter 19(30) 3(11) 16(46) 0.002
Timefromadmissiontosampling(days),median(IQR) 25(6–49) 36(15–61) 13(0–31) 0.006 Timetopositiveculturedetection(days),median(IQR) 1(1–2) 1(1–1) 2(1–2) 0.009
Temperature>38◦C,n(%) 51(81) 25(89) 26(74) 0.132
WBCcount(×109/L) 9.2(5.0–13.2) 8.9(3.1–12.5) 9.2(7.3–13.8) 0.290
CRP(mg/dL),median(IQR) 6.6(3.3–15.9) 6.1(3.2–13.5) 7.1(4.4–16.4) 0.481 Hospitalstay(days),median(IQR) 57(27–97) 81(38–135) 36(17–63) 0.002
Abbreviations:IQR,interquartilerange;DM,diabetesmellitus;ESRD,end-stagerenaldisease;LC,livercirrhosis;CV,centralvenous;WBC,white bloodcell;CRP,C-reactiveprotein.
a Other:urology(n=2),respiratorymedicine(n=2),dermatology(n=2),orthopedics(n=1),respiratorysurgery(n=1),andneurosurgery(n=1)
departments.
thaninthecontaminationgroup(p=0.009).Therewereno
sig-nificantdifferencesinmedianleukocytecountorC-reactive
proteinlevelbetweenthetwogroups.In51ofthe63cases,the
patienthadfever(temperature>38◦C)atthetimetheblood
culturesamplewastaken.
Final identification of the Corynebacterium spp. isolated
wereC.striatum(n=38),C.jeikeium(n=6),andC.argentoratense
(n=2). The species was reported only as “Corynebacterium
sp.” in 19 cases, either because the physician in charge
didnotrequestfurtheridentificationor thelaboratorywas
unabletoidentifythe species.Two species(C.striatumand
Corynebacterium sp.) were identified simultaneously in two
cases(Table2).Therewasasignificantdifferencebetweenthe
differentspeciesregardingratesofbacteremiaversus
contam-ination(p=0.001).Two setsofblood cultureswere obtained
from60patients,andonesetofbloodcultureswasobtained
fromthreepatients.Multiplebloodculturespecimenswere
positive in38% (23/60)of thesepatients. Thesame
organ-ismisolatedfrom bloodsampleswasisolated fromvenous
cathetertipspecimens(n=11), followedbysputum,wound
site,urine,anddrainspecimens.In45patients,onlytheblood
culturespecimenwaspositiveforCorynebacteriumspp.A
cen-tralorperipheralvenouscatheterwasconsideredthesource
of infection in 20 of the 28 patients with bacteremia; the
cathetertipwas culturepositiveforCorynebacteriumspp.in
12casesandculturenegativeinthreecases;thecatheterwas
notremovedandsentforcultureintheremainingfivecases.
The results of the antimicrobial susceptibility tests are
shown in Table3. All isolates were susceptibleto
minocy-cline, vancomycin, and teicoplanin. Most isolates were
resistant to penicillin, imipenem/cilastatin, erythromycin,
clindamycin,andlevofloxacin.Table4showsthe
antimicro-bialagentsadministeredafterthefinalreportwasissuedby
themicrobiologylaboratory.Appropriateantimicrobialswere
administered in all except one case in which the patient
died beforethe final reportwas issued. Ofthe 27 patients
whoreceivedappropriateantimicrobialtherapy,24werecured
whilethreediedasaresultofCorynebacteriumbacteremia.
Discussion
Inthis retrospectivestudy,weanalyzedtheclinical dataof
patients who had Corynebacterium spp. identified on blood
culture. More than 40% of patients were determined to
have bacteremiabasedon theirclinical characteristics and
course. C.striatum was the speciesmostfrequently
identi-fiedinpatientswithbacteremia.Therouteofinfectionwas
via venous cathetersin >50% of patientswith bacteremia;
this infection route has been reported in several
Table2–FinalidentificationofCorynebacteriumspp.,bloodculturepositivitypattern,andsitesfromwhichspecimens, takensimultaneouslywithbloodspecimens,culturedpositiveforCorynebacteriumspp.
Total(n=63) Bacteremia(n=28) Contamination(n=35)
Identifiedspeciesa
Corynebacteriumstriatum 38 22 16
Corynebacteriumjeikeium 6 4 2
Corynebacteriumargentoratense 2 1 1
Corynebacteriumsp. 19 1 18
Positivity[positiveset(s)/set(s)taken]
2/2 23 23 0 1/2 39 5 34 1/1 3 0 3 Isolationsitesb Cathetertip 11 9 2 Sputum 5 2 3 Wound(pus) 3 2 1 Urine 2 2 0 Drain 1 1 0 None 45 15 30
a Intwopatients,twospecies(C.striatumandCorynebacteriumsp.)wereidentifiedinthesamebloodculturesampling.
b Infourcases,thesamespecieswereisolatedfrommultiplesites(threecasesinthebacteremiagroupandonecaseinthecontamination
group).
Table3–AntibioticsusceptibilityofCorynebacteriumspp.isolatedfrombloodculturespecimens(susceptible/tested(%)).
ABPC ABPC/SBT IPM/CS GM EM CLDM MINO VCM TEIC ST LVFX
C.striatum(n=31) 2/31(7) 5/31(16) 5/31(16) 22/22(100) 3/22(14) 3/31(10) 31/31(100) 31/31(100) 31/31(100) 27/31(87) 1/31(3)
C.jeikeium(n=6) 0/6(0) 0/6(0) 1/6(17) 1/6(17) 0/6(0) 0/6(0) 4/6(67) 6/6(100) 6/6(100) 4/6(67) 0/6(0)
C.argentoratense(n=2) 0/2(0) 0/2(0) 0/2(0) 2/2(100) 2/2(100) 2/2(100) 2/2(100) 2/2(100) 2/2(100) 2/2(100) 0/2(0)
Corynebacteriumsp.(n=1) 0/1(0) 0/1(0) 1/1(100) 1/1(100) 0/1(0) 0/1(0) 1/1(100) 1/1(100) 1/1(100) 0/1(0) 0/1(0)
Abbreviations:ABPC,ampicillin;ABPC/SBT,ampicillin–sulbactam;IPM/CS,imipenem/cilastatin;GM,gentamicin;EM,erythromycin;CLDM, clindamycin;MINO,minocycline;VCM,vancomycin;TEIC,teicoplanin;ST,sulfamethoxazole–trimethoprim;LVFX,levofloxacin.
Table4–Antimicrobialtreatmentandoutcomeof patientswithbacteremiacausedbyCorynebacteriumspp.
Antimicrobialdrug n(%) Outcome
Cured Died Vancomycin 19(68%) 17 2 Teicoplanin 4(14%) 3 1 Daptomycin 2(7%) 2 0 Linezolid 1(4%) 1 0 Minocycline 1(4%) 1 0 None 1(4%) 0 1
infections, there is broad consensus that growth of the sameorganisminpairedbloodculturesamples,drawnfrom a peripheral vein and the suspected source, indicates a true or relevant infection.13 Corynebacterium spp. can
colo-nize prostheses, catheter tips, and ventilator and feeding
tubes; however, Corynebacterium spp. isolated from these
prosthesesareusuallyconsideredcontaminants.Ingeneral,
bacterialskincommensalshaverelativelylowvirulence,but
DeSouzaetal.14recentlyreportedthatbiofilmproductionby
antimicrobial-resistantC.striatumisanewvirulencefactor
andisrelatedtonosocomialoutbreaks.Inaddition,this
organ-ismhasbeenreportedtocausepneumoniaandurinarytract
infections.15,16
Asmentioned above,forthe purposeofthis study,
bac-teremiawasdefinedastwobloodculturesetstestingpositive
or one blood culture set testing positive plus a positive
culture result for a specimen from another site. There is,
however, evidence that bacterialskin commensals isolated
from evenone blood culture specimen might reflect
clini-callyrelevantinfection.17,18Severalstudieshavereportedthat
the timetopositivitycanbeused todiscriminatebetween
contaminationand bacteremia.19–21 Zhanget al.21 reported
that the time to positivity was <36h in 98% of cases of
bacteremiacaused byGram-positivebacteria. In ourstudy,
although the exact time to positivity (in hours) was not
recorded, the time to positivity (in days) was significantly
longer in the contamination group and was within three
daysinallcasesofbacteremia.Inthepresentstudy,atime
to positivity of four days or more suggested
contamina-tion.
Paststudieshavegenerallyreportedonthesusceptibilityof
C.striatumtothe-lactamgroupofantimicrobials.1,22,23
How-ever,withincreasinguseofbroad-spectrumantibiotics,recent
studies have shown the emergence ofmultidrug resistant
strains.24,25Inourstudy,mostisolatedstrainsweremultidrug
resistant,andalltestedstrainsweresusceptibleonlyto
gly-copeptides, suchasvancomycin and teicoplanin.Basedon
ourresults(andinaccordancewiththoseofpreviousstudies),
therapyshouldincludevancomycinbecauseinvitroresistance
tovancomycinhasnotbeenreported.2,25
Allbutonepatientinthisstudyreceivedprompttreatment
withanantimicrobialagenttowhichtheisolated
Corynebac-teriumspp.wassusceptible.Nonetheless,threepatientsdied;
theircomorbiditiesweremalignancy(n=2)and
immunosup-pression(n=1).Allthreepatientshadcentralvenouscatheters
in situ; these catheters were not removed because of the
severe clinical condition of the patients. Previous studies
havereportedthatwhileCorynebacteriumspp.infectioncan
beassociatedwithdeath,mostcasesare relativelyeasy to
managewithantimicrobialtherapyandcatheterremoval,if
applicable.26–28 Kimura et al.29 also reported that catheter
removalwithinaweektendedtobeassociatedwithbetter
outcomesinpatientswithacentralvenouscatheter.
Thisstudyhassomelimitations.First,itwasa
retrospec-tivestudy.Second,wecouldnotclearlydistinguishbetween
thetrueinfectiongroupandcontaminationgroupbecauseof
theabsenceofestablishedclinicalandbacteriological
mark-ersofinfectionwithCorynebacteriumspp.18,30Therefore,some
patientswithcontaminationmayhavebeenincludedinthe
bacteremiagroup,andviceversa.However,allpatientsinthe
bacteremiagroupwereconsideredtohavebacteremiaandall
receivedtreatmentforbloodstreaminfectionwith
Corynebac-teriumspp.,basedontheirclinicalcourse,cultureresults,and
therecommendationofinfectiousdiseasespecialists.Third,
speciesidentificationwascarriedout inonlyasmall
num-berofpatientsbecauseitisnotgenerallyperformedinJapan,
especiallyifcontaminationisstronglysuspected.Thus, we
couldnotevaluatetheimpactofdifferentspeciesonclinical
outcomes.Lastly,dataonthetotaldurationoftherapywere
notcollected;thus,animportantdimensioninthetreatment
andcourseofbacteremiawasneglected.
Conclusions
Inconclusion,ouranalysisshowedthatCorynebacteriumspp.
isolatedfrombloodculturespecimenscancausebloodstream
infectionsinaconsiderableproportionofpatients.Younger
age,shortertimetoculturepositivity,andthepresenceofan
indwellingcatheterareassociatedwithbacteremia.Because
multidrug-resistantCorynebacteriumspp.havebecome
com-mon,administrationofappropriateantimicrobialagents,such
as vancomycin, should be initiatedpending the results of
antimicrobialsusceptibilitytestinginpatientswithsuspected
bacteremiacausedbyCorynebacteriumspp.
Funding
Thisresearchdidnotreceiveanyspecificgrantfromfunding
agenciesinthepublic,commercial,ornot-for-profitsectors.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Elsevier
(http://webshop.elsevier.com/languageservices/) for English
languageediting.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.FunkeG,VonGraevenitzA,ClarridgeJEIII,BernardKA. Clinicalmicrobiologyofcoryneformbacteria.ClinMicrobRev. 1997;10:125–59.
2.ChenFL,HsuehPR,TengSO,OuTY,LeeWS.Corynebacterium striatumbacteremiaassociatedwithcentralvenouscatheter infection.JMicrobiolImmunolInfect.2012;45:255–8.
3.Rozdzinski,KernW,SchmeiserT,KurrleE.Corynebacterium jeikeiumbacteremiaatatertiarycarecenter.Infection. 1991;19:201–4.
4.WestbladeLF,ShamsF,DuongS,etal.Septicarthritisofa nativekneejointduetoCorynebacteriumstriatum.JClin Microbiol.2014;52:1786–8.
5.BoltinD,KatzirM,BugoslavskyV,etal.Corynebacterium striatum—aclassicpathogeneludingdiagnosis.EurJIntern Med.2009;20:e49–52.
6.SaviniV,GherardiG,FavaroM,etal.Aboutabloodstream Corynebacteriumstriatumisolate.FoliaMicrobiol(Praha). 2013;58:451–3.
7.MartínMC,MelónO,CeladaMM,ArvalezJ,MéndezFJ, VázquezF.SepticemiaduetoCorynebacteriumstriatum: molecularconfirmationofentryviatheskin.JMedMicrobiol. 2003;52:599–602.
8.BeekmannSE,DiekemaDJ,DoernGV.Determiningthe clinicalsignificanceofcoagulase-negativestaphylococci isolatedfrombloodcultures.InfectControlHospEpidemiol. 2005;26:559–66.
9.RichterSS,BeekmannSE,CrocoJL,etal.Minimizingthe workupofbloodculturecontaminants:implementationand evaluationofalaboratory-basedalgorithm.JClinMicrobiol. 2002;40:2437–44.
10.BatesDW,GoldmanL,LeeTH.Contaminantbloodcultures andresourceutilization.Thetrueconsequencesof false-positiveresults.JAMA.1991;265:365–9.
11.ClinicalandLaboratoryStandardsInstitute.M45eA2; methodsforantimicrobialdilutionanddisksusceptibility testingofinfrequentlyisolatedorfastidiousbacteria: approvedguideline,2nded.Wayne,PA:Clinicaland LaboratoryStandardInstitute;2010.
12.YangHS,KimYJ,ChoSY,ShinE,LeeHJ.Centralvenous catheter-relatedbloodstreaminfectionbyCorynebacterium striatumidentifiedby16SrRNAandrpoBgenesequencing. AnnLabMed.2015;35:548–50.
13.MermelLA,AllonM,BouzaE,etal.Clinicalpracticeguidelines forthediagnosisandmanagementofintravascular
catheter-relatedinfection:2009updatebytheinfectious diseasessocietyofAmerica.ClinInfectDis.2009;49:1–45.
14.DeSouzaC,FariaYV,Sant’AnnaLdeO,etal.Biofilm productionbymultiresistantCorynebacteriumstriatum associatedwithnosocomialoutbreak.MemInstOswaldo Cruz.2015;110:242–8.
15.RenomF,GarauM,RubiM,RamisF,GalmésA,SorianoJB. NosocomialoutbreakofCorynebacteriumstriatuminfectionin patientswithchronicobstructivepulmonarydisease.JClin Microbiol.2007;45:2064–7.
16.LealSMJr,JonesM,GilliganPH.Clinicalsignificanceof commensalGram-positiverodsroutinelyisolatedfrom patientsamples.JClinMicrobiol.2016;54:2928–36.
17.FadelHJ,PatelR,VetterEA,BaddourLM.Clinicalsignificance ofasingleStaphylococcuslugdunensis-positivebloodculture.J ClinMicrobiol.2011;49:1697–9.
18.RuheJ,MenonA,MushattD,DejaceP,HasbunR. Non-epidermidiscoagulase-negativestaphylococcal bacteremia:clinicalpredictorsofbacteremia.EurJClin MicrobiolInfectDis.2004;23:495–8.
19.Haimi-CohenY,ShafinooriS,TucciV,RubinLG.Useof incubationtimetodetectioninBACTEC9240todistinguish coagulase-negativestaphylococcalcontaminationfrom infectioninpediatricbloodcultures.PediatrInfectDisJ. 2003;22:968–74.
20.Garcia-VazquezE,Fernandez-RufeteA,Hernandez-TorresA, CanterasM,RuizJ,GomezJ.Wheniscoagulase-negative Staphylococcusbacteraemiaclinicallysignificant?ScandJ InfectDis.2013;45:664–71.
21.ZhangQ,LiD,BaiC,etal.Clinicalprognosticfactorsfortime topositivityincancerpatientswithbloodstreaminfections. Infection.2016;44:583–8.
22.LagrouK,VerhaegenJ,JanssensM,WautersG,VerbistL. Prospectivestudyofcatalase-positivecoryneformorganisms inclinicalspecimens:identification,clinicalrelevance,and antibioticsusceptibility.DiagMicrobiolInfectDis.
1998;30:7–15.
23.VerrokenA,BauraingC,DeplanoA,etal.Epidemiological investigationofanosocomialoutbreakofmultidrug-resistant CorynebacteriumstriatumatoneBelgianuniversityhospital. ClinMicrobiolInfect.2014;20:44–50.
24.YooG,KimJ,UhY,LeeHG,HwangGY,YoonKJ.
Multidrug-resistantCorynebacteriumstriatumbacteremia:first caseinKorea.AnnLabMed.2015;35:472–3.
25.OtsukaY,OhkusuK,KawamuraY,BabaS,EzakiT,KimuraS. Emergenceofmultidrug-resistantCorynebacteriumstriatumas anosocomialpathogeninlong-termhospitalizedpatients withunderlyingdiseases.DiagMicrobiolInfectDis. 2006;54:109–14.
26.GhideS,JiangY,HachemR,ChaftariAM,RaadI. Catheter-relatedCorynebacteriumbacteremia:shouldthe catheterberemovedandvancomycinadministered?EurJ ClinMicrobiolInfectDis.2010;29:153–6.
27.Martinez-MartinezL,SuarezAI,Rodriguez-BanoJ,BernardK, MuniainMA.ClinicalsignificanceofCorynebacteriumstriatum isolatedfromhumansamples.ClinMicrobiolInfect. 1997;3:634–9.
28.WangCC,MattsonD,WaldA.Corynebacteriumjeikeium bacteremiainbonemarrowtransplantpatientswith Hickmancatheters.BoneMarrowTranspl.2001;27: 445–59.
29.KimuraSI,GomyoA,HayakawaJ,etal.Clinicalcharacteristics andpredictivefactorsformortalityincoryneformbacteria bloodstreaminfectioninhematologicalpatients.JInfect Chemother.2017;23:148–53.
30.KamathU,SingerC,IsenbergHD.Clinicalsignificanceof Staphylococcuswarneribacteremia.JClinMicrobiol. 1992;30:261–4.