И И А
Е
А И
630*43+630*583
А
А И
А ИЕ
А
И Е
ЮЧИ
А Е ИА
© 2014 . А. . и и 1, . . ф 2
1
. . .
660036, , , 50/28
2
. . .
660049, , . , 89
E-mail:[email protected], [email protected] 09.06.2014 .
-.
-.
,
( ,
),
-.
( ).
: - ,
, - ,
. ,
-, ,
-.
, .
–
-.
.
.
ю е ые : ,
-.
, ,
-.
-.
-,
-.
-,
-,
-. ,
-.
( ) ,
– .
– .
,
,
-, :
-.
-.
S. J. Muraro (1965) ,
(Hornby, 1935).
-, . .
.
38 70
. 30- . XX . , . 1941 .
. –
-,
,
.
- .
-.
-- .
-
(Appalachia),
-. 30- .
, -, (Bruce, 1951; Davis, 1959; Winkworth, 1961 .).
50- .
-,
(Muraro, 1965).
(Fons et al., 1959;
Rother-mel, 1983).
(NFDRS)
: .
,
- .
:
-, ,
.
(NFDRS)
-,
, (
-) –
(fuel models).
13 ,
-, ,
(Anderson,
1982).
,
-,
,
-.
-.
BEHAVE
40 (Andrews et al., 2008),
(Rother-mel, 1972) ,
(Arroyo et al., 2008).
NFDRS ( )
,
BEHAVE
,
-,
– , – .
,
-,
,
-,
.
BEHAVE
,
-.
,
(Burgan, Rothermel, 1984).
,
, ,
.
.
(Forestry Canada, 1992).
-16
(fuel types) (Alexander et al., 1984; Forestry Canada, 1992).
,
-.
( )
,
-,
-,
( ,
-, 2002).
-,
,
-,
-.
,
,
.
.
10 .
-;
50 .
(Trabaud, 1978).
-,
-.
30- . XX .
:
-, -,
-.
-. ,
,
, ,
-, , –
:
, « »,
( , 1936, 1947; ,
-- , 1979).
. .
( , 1939, 1949; .,
1968).
,
,
( …, 1979).
1980 .
-, –
1:100 000.
,
-.
60- .
XX .
-,
( , 1977;
, 1979),
«
-» ,
( ,
1988),
,
( , 1970).
-. -. -. .
,
,
-,
. . (1962, 1970).
7 ,
: 1) ,
2) , 3)
-.
,
-,
( ).
.
-,
( ) ( , , 1985). −
-,
.
-: 1) ,
2 ,
;
2) ( ,
-),
-; 3)
, ,
. . (
), ,
( ,
).
( - ,
. ,
-, ,
.), ,
, ,
( , 1988; ,
, 1996, 2002).
,
.
. . (1954).
. 1.
,
-, .
. .
и 1. ( , , 1996)
( . . ,
1962, 1970)
( )
*
-** I.
,
(
−
)
( )
( ) ( )
- ( ):
1
2
- ( )
( )
( )
( ):
1
2
-1 -1, -2
-2
-1
-1 -1, -2
-2
-8, 9, 11
II. ,
-2, -8 -2, -8 -2, -8
-9 -10,11 -11
III.
-( 0.5
)
- ( )
( )
- ( )
( ) ( )
( )
( )
IV. - ,
-3 -3
V.
-1, 2, 4 -1, 2, 4
VI. , ,
--6
-7, 6
-6
-6
VII.
,
,
-5
* : − , − , − , − .
** : − , (1), (2), (3),
- (4), (5); − , (6), (7); −
-,
,
– .
-,
( ,
, 2002),
-,
(Peter-son et al., 2013).
Ы Ы
-, .
-,
-, .
-,
-.
(
, ,
,
-,
)
.
-,
( , , 2002).
(
« »)
-,
, .
(1:10 000–1:50 000),
(
-)
-.
,
-,
( ) ,
: «
-» ( ) « »,
( ,
-, , , )
-.
-,
.
( - ),
, , ,
,
(
-)
,
(« »)
( ) ,
.
,
-( . . )
-.
,
( , 1990; ,
-, 2002).
( ., 1995).
-.
( ),
.
.
-.
.
-,
, –
( ,
1990).
-,
,
, ,
, , , ,
.
( ),
(
-, (05−07)
).
,
.
: « »,
( ), «
-»,
( ,
). .
( )
-. ( )
,
(« »)
( ),
-, . . ,
(0.5–0.7)
-.
( ).
-, . . .
( )
(
. . −1
-): I –
300 ; II – 301 1000;
III – 1001 3000; IV – 3001
10 000; V – 10 000 .
( ),
-.
.
1. : –
( ,
«
-» , . .
-); –
-,
.
2.
-.
,
,
-.
-.
( )
– . :
/ , / , / 1, / , / , / .
( )
-.
50 % –
« » , 50 % –
« ».
:
) « »
:
– :
– .
– :
-,
-, (
). – II; – 3–9 ;
– :
(
),
( : ,
-, . .).
( 3 )
-. – III; – 6–18 ;
– - :
( )
. :
1 –
( )
,
(
-). – IV; – 12–36 ;
2 –
-. ;
) « »
:
– - :
-,
( , ,
-, - –
). – I; – 1–4 ;
– :
: 1) ; 2)
-,
– ;
3) – ;
4) « »
– ; 5)
-- – . –
II; – 3–9 ;
– :
: 1) ,
-; 2)
, –
; 3) « »
– . – III; – 6–
18 ;
– « »: 1)
,
-, 2)
-,
-, 3)
--
-, . «
-»
-:
1 – 1)
-,
-, ,
( , ,
-); 2) ,
,
(
). – V; – 24–72 ;
2 – (
) −
-, , , , ,
. . .
-.
,
,
.
,
.
, ,
.
-. ,
,
-. ,
−
. –
(
-) ,
«
-» .
-: 1)
2) .
« »
-. -
, ,
-,
-. ,
(
-, ),
(
-, , ) .
-.
(I–III ), –
(IV–V ).
-.
-,
– - .
,
( ,
« »,
,
-) ,
( , «
-», . .
-).
,
-,
,
«
-» -
-.
, ,
,
:
- –
-,
-; –
; –
-.
(
- ),
-, – .
,
-.
-, – - ,
(
). , ,
(
-)
-, ,
(
-1).
--
, –
-. , -
-, –
( 1).
-, ,
,
-,
-, . . 1.
,
, , ,
,
-, –
(
1) ( , . .
I–II ).
(0.8 )
-: –
,
– ,
.
(
-, , , , ,
.),
. ,
-
-, –
,
- , -
– .
,
-.
.
,
( ).
-, –
(
)
.
- ,
– - .
-, ,
.
--
.
-, ,
-.
- :
,
– .
-,
-и 2. ( ., 2005)
« » « » , , , , , ,
, ,
( )
( )
0.8 0.5 –
0.7*
0.4 **
(
)
II I I I I
III II I I I
IV III III III III
1 1 V IV
( 1–V)
IV
( 1–V)
IV ( 1–V
)
IV ( 1–V )
2 2
. : * – 0.6 ;
** – 0.5 .
и 3. « »
( 50–60° . .) ( , , 1990)
30.IV 1.IX 1.V 31.VIII
, . 20–30 30 25 30
( 2),
-,
-.
-,
-: ,
,
,
-, ( ,
-, ) ,
( ).
,
,
.
-,
, .
-,
,
( . 2 3).
-.
,
, ,
-. ,
-, ,
( , , 1985).
-.
-, .
– , . .
,
-.
-,
,
-
-.
-,
.
-.
.
-: ,
, -,
.
,
(
). ,
-.
. ,
,
.
-.
.
12
-,
,
-. . 4
,
( , 1990).
,
– .
-,
.
,
. 1 2,
-.
,
-,
,
-, –
-.
,
-,
-, ,
,
( ),
.
.
-– .
(
0.3–0.5 2).
-.
.
( ,
-, ) .
,
,
-.
.
-. – 0.5 2.
.
-,
, ,
.
-,
-, . ,
– .
.
– ,
-, .
(
), – , . .
-,
( ,
-, . .).
-
-,
( 25 %).
.
2.5 .
( )
-. ( )
-.
-, ,
.
.
-,
. ,
,
« » ( , ,
.
-, «
» .
( )
( 1 ) (
., 2010).
И
М.
,
-,
.
( ) (
-, , 2002).
« »
( ),
( . 1).
(«
-»)
( )
( ) .
-. -. -1
-.
,
( ),
.
« »
: 1) ,
-,
-; 2)
( «
-»),
,
;
3)
-,
-,
-.
( , –
,
−
-,
–
( . 2 3).
и . 2. « » II ( ).
« » :
1) – ,
-, ,
; 2)
( –
).
-,
« ».
Ы Ы
(1:500 000–
1:1 000 000) (
-)
, .
-( . . ,
). –
( , ) (
-, 1996; Volokitina-, 1996).
( , , 2002).
( ).
( )
,
.
.
–
- (
).
( )
.
(
-,
-).
-.
.
, ,
( )
-- ( ,
-, ,
.)
( )
- ( )
,
.
-.
,
- .
.
.
-,
-, , . .
.
,
-.
: – , –
- , – - , –
, – , – , –
, – ;
-.
,
,
-: – , –
, – , –
-, –
-.
.
,
.
-, ,
. .
. ( 1:1 000 000)
( . 4)
-( 1:500 000) –45 –48 (
).
-
1:500 000 ( ),
« ».
-: 1)
( ,
);
2) «
-» (1972); 3) «
-» (1977); 4)
1:1 000 000–1:25 000; 5) (
1:1 000 000,
-1:1 000 000,
1:200 000); 6)
; 7)
.
И
М. . 5
-,
–47 ( 1:500 000).
( ) ,
-, ,
,
-,
-,
.
--
и . 4. . ( 1: 1 000 000).
( ): 1 – , 2 – , 3 – , 4 – , 5 –
-, 6 – - . : 7 – , 8 –
- , 9 – . ( / ): 10 –
- / , 11 – - / , 12 – /
-. : 13 – , 14 – , 15 – . : 16 – ,
17 – , 18 – , 19 – , 20 – , 21 – , 22 – , 23 –
. : 24 – , 25 – , 26 – , 27 – .
и . 5. III
( ).
,
-.
,
( ., 2005).
, ( )
.
−
.
.
-,
-,
-. , ,
.
-.
( BEHAVE)
( FBP).
,
-. -. -.
(
., 2010).
-,
-.
-( ),
-.
. . .
-,
( .,
2010). –
,
.
Ы
. .
-. :
. . . , 1988. 12 .
. .
(
-). .: . № 5352– 90.
1990. 31 . . .
(
.
-) //
. : . .
-, 1996. . 170–180.
. ., . .
// . 1996. № 3. . 38–44.
. ., . .
-. :
- , 2002. 314 .
. ., . .,
. .
-. .
: - . . .
, 1995. 47 .
. ., . .,
. .
-. . .
-: , 2005. 94 .
. ., . .,
. ., . .,
. .
-. : - . . .
-, 2010. 211 .
. .
-. :
. . - , 1977. 239 . . .
-. -.: , 1954. 33 .
. .
-. .: ,
1962. 154 . . .
//
. :
. . . ,
1970. . 5–58.
( 1:1 500 000) / . ., . . .: , 1977. 4 .
. .
. .: , 1936. 100 .
. .
-. : , 1947. 60 .
. ., - . .
-. -.: , 1979. . 2. 80 .
. .
- -
// . . 1939. . 9.
. 5–21.
. .
-. -.: , 1949. 76 .
. ., . ., Ш
. .
// . 1968.
№ 9. . 102–105.
( . 1:500 000). .: , 1972. 4 .
. ., . .
// . . 2010. № 3. . 139–144.
. .
// .
: . . .
, 1970. . 9–104.
. ., . .
// . . . . 1985. № 5. . 12–17.
. ., . .
.
: . . - , 1990.
204 .
. ., . . «
-»
// . -. . . 2000. № 3. . 52–57.
. ., . .,
. ., . .
.
-: - . . .
, 2005. 330 .
. .:
, 1979. 206 .
Ш . .
-: .
. … - .- . : 06.03.03.
-: . . .
, 1988. 46 .
. .
//
.
-: . . - , 1979.
. 195–213.
Alexander M. E., Lawson B. D., Stocks B. G.,
Van Wagner C. E. User guide to the
Cana-dian forest fire behaviour prediction system: rate of spread relationships. Canad. For. Serv. Fire Danger Group. 1984. 73 p.
Anderson H. E. Aids to determine fuel models
for estimating fire behaviour. Ogden. Gen. Techn. Rep. INT-122, 1982. 22 p.
Andrews P. L., Bevins C. D., Seli R. C. Behave
plus fire modeling system. Version 4.0: User Guide. Mountain Res. St. 2008. 116 p.
Arroyo L. A., Pasccual C., Manzanera J. A. Fire
models and methods to map fuel types: the role of remote sensing // For. Ecol. Manag. 2008. V. 256. P. 1239–1252.
Burgan R. E., Rothermel R. C. Behave: fire
be-haviour prediction and fuel modeling system –
fuel subsystem. USDA For. Serv. Gen. Techn. Rep. INT-167, 1984. 126 p.
Bruce D. Fuel weights on the Osceola National
Forest // Fire Control Notes. 1951. N. 12(3). P. 20–23.
Davis K. P., Byram G. M., Krumm W. R. Forest
fire: control and use. N.Y., Toronto, London, 1959. 584 p.
Fons W. L., Bruce H. D., Pong W. Y. A
steady-state technique for studying the properties of tree-burning wood fires in the use of models in fire research. Nat. Res. Council Pub. 786. 1959. P. 219–234.
Forestry Canada. Development and structure of the Canadian forest fire behavior prediction system. Inf. Rep. ST–X–3. Ottawa, 1992. 63 p.
Hornby L. G. Fuel type mapping in region one //
J. For. 1935. V. 33. P. 67–72.
Muraro S. J. Fuel classification: a review of the
literature and discussion of principles // Proc. Second Federal Fire Res. Conf. Victoria, B.C., Canada. 1965. 23 p.
Peterson S. H., Franklin J., Roberts D. A., Van
Wagtendonk J. W. Mapping fuels in
Yosem-ite National Park // Can. J. For. Res. 2013. N. 43. P. 7–117.
Rothermel R. C. A mathematical model for
pre-dicting fire spread in wildland fuels. Ogden: USDA, For. Serv. Res. Paper. INT–115. In-ter-Mountain For. and Range Experiment St. 1972. 40 p.
Rothermel R. C. How to predict the spread and
intensity of forest and range fires. Ogden: USDA, For. Serv. Inter-Mountain For. and Range Experiment St. UT 84401. Gen. Techn. Rep. INT–143. 1983. 161 p.
Trabaud L. Fuel mapping helps forest
fire-fighting in Southern France // Fire Manag. Notes. 1978. N. 1. P. 14–17.
Volokitina A. V. Forest fuel maps In Fire in
Eco-systems of Boreal Eurasia / J. G. Goldammer and V. V. Furyaev Eds. Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1996. P. 239–252.
Winkworth A. V. Analysis of a fuel type
Vegetation Fuel Mapping
A. V. Volokitina1, T. M. Sofronova2
1
V. N. Sukachev Institute of Forest, Russian Academy of Science, Siberian Branch Akademgorodok, 50/28, Krasnoyarsk, 660036 Russian Federation
2
V. P.Astafiev Krasnoyasrsk State Pedagogical University
Ada Lebedeva str., 89, Krasnoyarsk, 660049 Russian Federation E-mail:[email protected], [email protected]
All vegetation sites as objects of burning are structural complexes of various fuels. Es-pecially complex are forest biogeoceonoses. For practical use, pyrological characteris-tics of vegetation are reflected on plans and maps showing both general one-sided esti-mations with site descriptions (for example, their fire hazard) and detailed multi-sided characteristics of all compounds in the vegetation fuel complexes. The latter become basic maps for obtaining various pyrological estimations and are called vegetation fuel maps. Vegetation fuel (VF) mapping can be made using two methodological ap-proaches: first, by distinguishing pyrological vegetation categories as standard com-plexes; second, by individually characterizing each vegetation site in terms of VF. Ob-viously, the standard VF characteristic of sites can be only approximate and rough, since the possible number of studied site categories is limited. For large-scale mapping, the detailed individual characteristic of vegetation sites in terms of VF is more prefer-able and precise but more expensive. Therefore, historically, the first approach to VF mapping got its development, i. e. distinguishing and mapping of certain vegetation categories with standard characteristics. Foreign and Russian methodical approaches to vegetation fuel (VF) classification and mapping are considered. Examples of VF map-ping at different scales and guidelines for their use are given.
