• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Dental Press J. Orthod. vol.21 número4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Dental Press J. Orthod. vol.21 número4"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

© 2016 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 12 Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 July-Aug;21(4):12-3

edito

rial

Every year, in June, the major databases publish the impact exerted by scientiic periodicals in the scientiic context. While Thompson Reuters quantiies it as the journal’s impact factor, SCImago database terms it cites per doc. However, both estimate the average number of citations of articles published in a certain periodical. The  methods are very similar, with the only diference being the number of periodicals indexed in each database.

Recently, in June 2016, data on the citations made in 2015 were published. The number of citations made in 2015 for articles published in 2013 and 2014 was divided by the total number of articles published in 2013 and 2014. Therefore, an impact factor of 2, for a certain periodical, means that, for every article published in 2013 and 2014, there was, on average, two citations of such articles in 2015.

Despite criticism received by such bibliometrics, those evaluation systems have been widely used to as-sess the importance of a given periodical within its ield of expertise. Overall, the more oten a recently published article is cited, the greater its impact in the scientiic context. Although it has expanded, Den-tistry is not among the most impacting ields. While our best-ranked dental periodicals are near the aver-age of having ive citations per article, in Medical Sci-ences and Physics, a few periodicals have exceeded the

number of 40 citations per article published. In Den-tistry itself, specialties are heterogeneous. On one hand, our Periodontal periodicals have an average cites per doc of 5; on the other hand, in Orthodontics, Ameri-can Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics; Or-thodontics and Craniofacial Research and Angle Orthodontists presented cites per doc varying between 1.66 and 1.62, according to data provided in 2015.

Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics (DPJO), in-dexed in SCImago Scopus database, received its irst cites per doc in 2009, when the journal was published in Portuguese only. As from 2010, DPJO articles began to be published in English. Since then, our impact in-dex kept increasing and reached 0.25 in 2012 (Fig 1). At that point, there was an avalanche of good publi-cations, and, in 2013, a setback was rendered neces-sary, as a consequence of having to double the num-ber of articles published, so as to speed the publication

process up.1 Such change increased signiicantly this

equation denominator. Ater all necessary adjustments were made, in 2014, DPJO recovered part of its cites per doc loss from 2013.

Last June, we received data on the citations made in 2015, and found out we had an index equal to 0.44, a threefold increase in comparison to the previ-ous year. There are two main reasons to warrant such

How to cite: Normando D. Science and impact: the challenge faced by Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics. Dental Press J Orthod. 2016

July-Aug;21(4):12-3. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.012-013.edt

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.012-013.edt

1 Adjunct professor, Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), School of Dentistry, Belém, Pará, Brazil. Coordinator, Universidade Federal do Pará (UFPA), Graduate

program in Dentistry, and ABO-Pará, Specialization course in Orthodontics, Belém, Pará, Brazil. David Normando1

Science and impact: the challenge faced by Dental Press

Journal of Orthodontics

(2)

© 2016 Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 13 Dental Press J Orthod. 2016 July-Aug;21(4):12-3

Editorial

more accessible. This indexation increased the chanc-es of citation, thereby also increasing the equation numerator. Therefore, we went from 54 citations in 2012, before being indexed in PubMed, to 130 cita-tions in 2015 (Fig 2).

We have grown signiicantly; however, a lot more is yet to be reached. For the index to be determined in 2017, based on data from 2016, the equation denomi-nator (number of articles published in 2014 and 2015) will be decreased by 20%. Additionally, it is hoped that the number of citations will increase, especially due to the periodical being indexed in PubMed Central. This database provides full, free access to all articles published from 2014 onwards, on the following web-site: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/journals/2644. If we consider a potential decrease of 20% in the equation denominator and an increase of 80% in the equation numerator, we believe that we will be able to double DPJO’s cites per doc in 2017 and reach a number close to 1.0. Should this be fulilled, DPJO will become one of the six periodicals exerting the greatest impact in world-wide Orthodontics. If there once were so many stones in the middle of the road, many of them have already been removed, while some are yet to be.

David Normando - editor-in-chief (davidnormando@hotmail.com)

1. Normando D. Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics and QUALIS. Dental Press J Orthod. 2015 Sept-Oct;20(5):12-3.

REFERENCES

signiicant growth. The irst is the adjustment made to publication low, reducing the time interval between manuscript submission and publication, and, most of all, having a smaller number of more selective articles published: while in 2013, 138 articles were published, in 2014 and 2015, 101 and 92 articles were published, respectively. Thus, we have been reducing the equa-tion denominator. The second reason was having DPJO indexed in PubMed database in 2013, thus rendering knowledge published by this periodical

Self-cites

Total cites +

2009 140

70

0

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 2 - Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics total number of citations (total cites) and self-citations (self-cites) between 2009 and 2015.

Citations per document (cites per doc) +

2009

Cites per doc (4 years) Cites per doc (3 years) Cites per doc (2 years)

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

Figure 1 - Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics cites per doc between 2009 and 2015.

0.450

0.300

0.150 0.375

0.225

Imagem

Figure 2 - Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics total number of citations  (total cites) and self-citations (self-cites) between 2009 and 2015.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

It has got three segments that should be considered by all clinical analyses, whether therapeutic or experimental: the anterior segment (before the incisive foramen,

Current main research proj- ects in our department are (1) elucidation of pathogenic mechanism in malocclusion and management of oral maxillofacial skeletal growth; (2)

Static friction force for the passive self-ligating system (3D), PSWb conven- tional brackets with conventional or metal ligatures, and STb brackets associated with an unconventional

Y-axis, Sella-Nasion to mandibular plane angle (SN.MP), maxillary plane to mandibular plane angle (MMA), Sella-Nasion to Gonion-Gnathion angle (SN.GoGn), Frankfort to mandibular

The parameters which diferentiate between extraction and nonextraction treatment modalities in Class I border- line cases are upper and lower lip protrusion in relation to E-plane

Cleansing orthodontic brackets with sodium bicar- bonate blasting, i.e., air-powder polishing (APP), for ive seconds is an efective method to reduce the lev- els of debris buildup

The aim of this study is to compare the equivalent and efective doses of diferent digital radiographic methods (panoramic, lateral cephalometric and periapical) with

Moderate and severe mandibular asymmetries occurred in a higher proportion in patients with unilateral posterior tooth absence.. However, there was no statistically significant