• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.59 número3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.59 número3"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

384 Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia Vol. 59, No 3, Maio-Junho, 2009 CARTAS AO EDITOR / LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Reply

To the Editor

We acknowledge the important comments of Forgiarini Jr et al. regarding our study: Evaluating the use of the Tobin index on

mechanical ventilation weaning after general anesthesia 1.

Forgiarini Jr et al. suggested paring patients according to the operatory risk determined by the classification of the Ame-rican Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA). Their justification was that the incidence of complications of high-risk patients could be higher and the predictive index of failure could be worse. However, patients in this study were divided into two groups according to the Tobin index and, therefore, this index was considered the study parameter and all other parameters were compared to it, including the ASA classification. Even with the important difference in elevated ASA score between both groups (10% of patients in group I were ASA III or IV versus 50% in group II), univariate logistic regression analysis did not detect statistically significant differences, indicating that this score did not affect the risk of extubation failure.

Although the homogeneity of variances was verified by the Levene test and the normality by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, even a statistically significant difference among the parameters of the study population would not invalidate the results of the study, since it was the study parameter (Tobin index with a cutting point of < 80 c.L.-1min-1 or 80 c.L.-1min-1)

that defined both groups of patients. Univariate and

multiva-riate logistic regression analysis identified three significant parameters for the development of post-extubation compli-cations (age, weight, and smoking), of which age and weight were independent parameters. Aging is associated with reduction often subclinical in the functional capacity of the organs (emphysema, benign nephrosclerosis, coronary artery atheroma), which undoubtedly increase the risk of complications, including those associated with extubation. The risks of post-extubation complications in obese patients and smokers were adequately explored by Forgiarini Jr et al. and confirmed by the results of our study.

To conclude, we would like to emphasize that the results of this study are a consequence of a strictly applied methodo-logy and we thank Forgiarini Jr et al. for their carefully reading of our study, the explanations, and pertinent comments.

Nara de Cássia Mantovani Lúcia Maria Martins Zuliani Daniela Tiemi Sano Daniel Reis Waisberg Israel Ferreira da Silva Jaques Waisberg

REFERÊNCIAS – REFERENCES

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Mean score and standard deviation in the lidocaine group were 2.55 ± 2.34 and in the saline solution group were 3.75 ± 2.52 with no statis- tically significant difference between

Even though no differences were found in Gleason scores or in pathological findings between both groups, which was different from our study, the first group presented a

(1) Group I showed a reduction of muscular signs after treatment (2) Small changes in Groups II and III after 2 years (3) joint noise increased in three groups, but less in Group

Signiicant differences between both the groups (Group 1 and Group 2) were found in three domains of the WHOQOL-BREF, namely physical, psychological, and social relationships, with

Among 30 patients with elevated 24-h UFC, levels were signiicantly more elevated in the group of patients with unsuppressed cortisol after administration of 1 mg

In the present study, both groups were treated with anesthetic eye drops before the ophthalmologic examination and significantly more patients in the control group had a high NIPS

Thus, even with altered auditory thresholds in dif- ferent frequencies in Group A, there was no difference between the groups in the neural transmission at the level of the

According to size of perforation, patients were subdivided into three groups, Group I had perforation &gt;50% of tympanic membrane area, in Group II patients the perforations