Original
Article
Ovary
and
fruit
morphology
and
anatomy
of
Amphilophium
crucigerum
Rosana
Casoti
a,
Melânia
Palermo
Manfron
a,∗,
João
Marcelo
Santos
de
Oliveira
b aLaboratóriodeFarmacognosia,UniversidadeFederaldeSantaMaria,SantaMaria,RS,BrazilbLaboratóriodeBotânicaEstrutural,UniversidadeFederaldeSantaMaria,SantaMaria,RS,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received2April2015 Accepted6August2015
Availableonline28September2015
Keywords:
Crystals Histochemical Morphoanatomy Ovary Seed Trichomes
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Amphilophiumcrucigerum(L.)L.G.Lohmann,knownas“pente-de-macaco”isaspeciesofBignoniaceae nativetoBrazil,andwhoseseedsareusedinfolkmedicine.Thisstudyaimedtodescribe morphoanatomi-calfeaturesofthisspeciesoffruittoaidinitscorrectidentificationandpharmacognosticanalysis.Samples ofovary,pericarpandseedwerefixedwith3%glutaraldehyde,sectionedonarotarymicrotomeand ana-lyzedbystereomicroscope.Theresultsareshowninthreeparts:(1)Theovarypresentspeltatetrichomes, longnon-glandulartrichomesandemergencesintheepidermis;itis2-carpellateandunilocularwithtwo intrudingparietalplacenta;ovulesarenumerousontheplacenta;itpresentsalargequantityofcrystals. (2)Thepericarpiswoody,denselyechinateandellipticshape;itpresentsa2-valvedcapsuleandis septi-cidal;itpresentsemergences,stomata,lenticels,crystalsandalargequantityofclusteredstonescells.(3) Seedsarealate,exalbuminateandexotestal;thereisalargeamountofcrystalsintheexotestalregion;it presentsanendotheliumandremnantendosperm.Histochemicaltestsshowedthepresenceoflipophilic substances,polysaccharides,phenolicsubstances,alkaloidsandasmallquantityofstarch.These phar-macobotanicalfeaturesdescribedforA.crucigerumareessentialforthepharmacognosticanalysisofthe drugplant.
©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeFarmacognosia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.
Introduction
The Bignoniaceae family is composed of approximately 406
species,predominantlyneotropical(Lohmann,2015).Onlythree
tribesofthisfamilyoccurinBrazil:Tecomeae,Crescentieaeand
Bignonieae (Sandwith and Hunt,1974; Von Poseret al., 2000).
Amphilophiumcrucigerum(L.)L.G.Lohmannbelongstothe
Bignon-ieaetribe,whosegenusiscomposedof28lianaspecies(Lohmann,
2015). A. crucigerum presents synonymy with Pithecoctenium echinatumandPithecocteniumcrucigerumamongseveralother
syn-onyms(Lohmann,2015).
Thisspeciesfrequentlygrowsonforestclearingsandonthe
bor-dersofhighways.ItbloomsfromOctobertoDecember.InBrazil,A.
crucigerumispopularlyknownas“pente-de-macaco”andis
cul-tivatedasornamental(Sandwith andHunt,1974).Itsfruitsare
usedinfolkmedicinetotreatneuralgia(Bye,1979),inflammations,
skininfectionsandheadachesandasacalmingagent(Francoand
Fontana,2005).
The Bignoniaceae species typically present iridoids,
alka-loids, flavones, naphthaquinones, anthraquinones, tannins, and
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:[email protected](M.P.Manfron).
anthocyanins(Fischeretal.,2004).Iridoidglycosideswereisolated
from stems of A. crucigerum, showing an antioxidant potential
againstDPPH,bybioautography,andagainstacetylcholinesterase
inhibitors(Martinetal.,2007).
Despite the pharmacological potential attributed to A.
cru-cigerum,therearenoreportstodatedescribingdiagnosticfeatures
fordiscriminatingthisspecies.Delimitingthegenericlevelofthe
BignonieaetribehasalwaysbeenaproblemaccordingtoLohmann
(2006),duetothelackofdiagnosticfeaturesandbecauseof
over-lappingpatternsofmorphologicalvariationwhichmakeitdifficult
toidentify.Thepresentstudyaimstocharacterizethe
morpho-logical and anatomical featuresof theovary,pericarp andseed
ofA.crucigerum,describingusefulstructuralfeaturesinorderto
improve its descriptionand identification,as wellto present a
histochemicalanalysis.Thesefeaturesareessentialforthe
phar-macognosticanalysisofthedrugplant.
Materialandmethods
Plantmaterial
Amphilophiumcrucigerum(L.)L.G.Lohmann,Bignoniaceae,was
obtainedfromtheSouthernregionofBrazil,at29◦41′02′′Sand
53◦48′25′′W.Theflowersandmaturefruits,fromsevenindividuals,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2015.08.006
16 R.Casotietal./RevistaBrasileiradeFarmacognosia26(2016)15–22
Fig.1.DissectedflowerofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Generalaspectofthegynoecium;(B)ovaryshowingtrichomes(25×);and(C)cross-sectionofovary(35×).
werecollectedfromNovembertoMarch.Thecollectedmaterial
wasidentifiedby GilbertoDolejal Zanettiandthevoucher was
registeredundernumber 12872 SMDBattheherbarium ofthe
BiologyDepartmentattheFederalUniversityofSantaMaria.
Morphologicalandanatomicalcharacterization
AfterdissectionwithstereomicroscopeSZH10(Olympus®
)and
M80(Leica®),thesampleswerefixedin3%glutaraldehydein0.1M
sodiumphosphatebuffer,pH7.2(Gabriel,1982)andsubmittedto
vacuumfor6hforimprovedinfiltration.Subsequently,thesamples
werewashedin0.1Msodiumphosphatebuffer,pH7.2(Gabriel,
1982),andthenindistilledwater.Tween20wasutilizedduring
24hforextractionofepicuticularwaxes.Subsequently,the
sam-plesunderwentdehydrationinanethylalcoholseries,followedby
solutionsofchloroformandpureethanol(1:3,1:1,3:1,1:1,1:3),
andfinallyofpureethanol.Thesampleswerepre-infiltratedina
2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate(HEMA)andpureethanolsolution(1:1)
during12h,followedinpureHEMAandembeddinginthesame
resin,inaTeflonholderuntilreachingpolymerization(Gerritsand
Smid,1983).Sectionsof5mthicknessweremadeusingaRM2245
rotarymicrotome(Leica®).ToluidineblueOin0.05%sodium
ben-zoatebuffer,pH4.4wasusedforstaining(FederandO’Brien,1968).
PermanentslidesweredepositedinthecollectionattheStructural
BotanyLaboratoryoftheBiologyDepartment,UFSM.Observations
andphotomicrographsinbrightfieldandpolarizedlightwere
per-formedusingaDM2000microscope(Leica®
)withaDFC295image
capturesystem(Leica®).
Histochemicalanalysis
Handsectionsofseedswerepreparedforhistochemicaltestsfor
differentpurposes:Lugol’ssolutionforstarch(Jensen,1962);Sudan
IIItodetectlipophilicsubstances(Brundrettetal.,1991);
Dragen-dorfftodetectalkaloids(FurrandMahlberg,1981);PAS(periodic
acid-Schiff)todetecttotalpolysaccharides(Maia,1979)and
tolui-dineblueforlignins,pectinsandphenoliccompounds(O’Brienand
McCully,1981).
Resultsanddiscussion
Gynoeciummorphology
Thestigmais2-lobed(Fig.1A).Theyellowishanddenselyhairy
ovaryissuperiorandcylindricalinthetransversalsection(Fig.1B
andC).Thetrichomes,situatedintheovary,reflectedlightwhen
observedunderthemagnifyingglass(Fig.1BandC).
Arelativelywell-developedring-shapednectaryispresentat
thebaseoftheovary(Fig.1A),wheretherearestomataand
tri-chomessimilartothosefoundintheovary.Thetypeofnectaryand
thepresenceoftrichomesinthenectaryareconsideredinvariable
features,makingthemimportantinthedeterminationofspeciesof
differentgenera,includingAmphilophium(Rivera,2000).Someof
thefeaturesdescribedabovewerealsodescribedforgenus
deter-minationbySandwithandHunt(1974),Galetto(1995),Nogueira
etal.(2013)andLohmannandTaylor(2014).
Ovaryanatomy
Theovaryis2-carpellate,unilocularandplurispermic,withtwo
intrudingparietalplacenta(Fig.2AandB),similartothatdescribed
byFischeretal.(2004).Theovulesareanatropous(Fig.2C).
Theouterepidermisiscomposedofonecelllayer,andpresents
alargequantityofnon-glandulartrichomes(Fig.3AandD).These
trichomesaremulticellular,longandnon-branched.Studiescarried
outbyNogueiraetal.(2013),inleavesofA.crucigerum,showedthe
presenceofbranchednon-glandulartrichomes.Inthenectarywas
observedstomata(Fig.3E).
Intheovary,emergenceswerealsoobserved,besidesa
rela-tivelyfewernumberofglandulartrichomesatdifferentstagesof
Fig.3.LongitudinalsectionoftheovaryofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Generalaspectofovary;(B)outerepidermis;(C)trichomeandemergence;(D)outerepidermis withcrystals;and(E)stomata.cr,crystals;em,emergence;ep,epidermiscells;gt,glandulartrichomes;mp,mesophyll;ne,nectary;ov,ovule;st,stomata;tr,trichomes.
development(Fig.3BandD).Theemergencespossesswidebases
and the subepidermal cells are only partof thebase, possibly
derivedfromoneortwosubepidermalcells(Fig.3C).Alarge
por-tionofthisstructureismadeofcellsderivedfromtheepidermis.
Thearrangementandsizeofthesecellsareirregular.Inaddition,
theemergencespresentasharpapexdefinedbyasinglecell.
Theglandulartrichomeisapeltatemorphotype,composedof
sixcellslocatedontheheadofthetrichomeandasinglecellon
thestalk(Fig.3B).AccordingtoNogueiraetal.(2013),thepresence
ofpeltatetrichomesisverycommoninspeciesoftheBignonieae
tribe.Thepresenceoftrichomesisoftenassociatedwithdesiccation
and/orprotectionagainstherbivores(Wagneretal.,2004).
The mesophyll is composed of parenchymatous tissue
(Figs. 2A and 3A). The marginal vascular bundles bifurcate
radiallywithhalfofthebundlefacingtowardacentralposition
neartheplacentae.Thus,theovaryhastwoventrallargevascular
bundlesandtwolargedorsalvascularbundlesonthecarpelwall,
Fig.4.LongitudinalsectionoftheovaryofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Detailof parenchymaticandvasculartissueswithcrystalaccumulation(brightfield)and(B) crystalsintheparenchymatictissueandinvascularbundlesafterpolarizedlight. cr,crystals;vb,vascularbundle.
besidesmanysmalllateralvascularbundlesfoundontheovary
wall(Figs.2Aand3A).
Numerouscrystalliferouscellsoccurinthemesophyll(Fig.2B).
There is also a large accumulation of calcium oxalate crystals
on the vascular tissue, which apparently obliterate some
ves-selelements,andtherefore,withoutanidentifiableformortype
(Figs.2Band4AandB).Theinnerepidermispresentsisodiametric
cellsthatdevelopvacuoles.Theepidermis,whichcoversthe
pla-centa,presentscellswithdensecytoplasmthataresmallerthan
thelocularcells (Fig.2B). Theovulesareanatropous,unitegmic
and tenuinucellate. They are located on the placenta and are
numerous (Fig. 3A). Part of the results is in agreement with
thoseusuallydescribedforBignoniaceaeandBignonieae(Corner,
1976;Armstrong,1985;Fischeretal.,2004,LohmannandTaylor,
2014).
18 R.Casotietal./RevistaBrasileiradeFarmacognosia26(2016)15–22
Fig.6. SeedsofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Generalaspectofseed:dorsalface;(B)generalaspectofseed:ventralface;(C)embryocoveredcoriaceouswrapper:raphe; (D)embryocoveredcoriaceouswrapper:anti-raphe;and(E)wingfrontview.
Fruitmorphology
Pericarp
Thefruitiselliptic,woodyanddenselyechinatewith
approx-imately12cminlength,6cminwidthand2cminthickness,in
themedianregion.Itiscomposedofa2-valvedcapsuleslightly
flattenedwithathickpericarpandaseminiferouscolumn(Fig.5A
andC).
Thefruitsaresepticidalcapsules,whichisoneofthekey
identi-fyingfeaturesfortheBignonieaetribe(Gentry,1980;Barrosoetal.,
1999;Fischeretal.,2004).Thepericarpsarebiconvexwithadorsal
vascularbundle.Thefruitisgreenish-browntorust-colored,when
dry.
AmongthemainfeaturesofA.crucigerumfruit,thereare
echi-nate(horn-like)projectionsoftheexocarp,whichisconsideredas
morphologicalsynapomorphiesinthisgenus(Pool,2007;Lohmann
Fig.8.LongitudinalsectionsthroughthelateralplaneoftheseedsofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Generalaspect;(B)testa;(C)endospermandendothelium;(D)detail ofthecotyledonnode;(E)hypocotylradicleaxis;and(F)calazalregion.cn,cotyledonnode;co,cotyledon;de,cotyledondorsalepidermis;eb,embryo;ed,endosperm;eh, hypocotylradicleaxis;et,endothelium;ex,exotesta;mt,mesotesta;t,testa.
andTaylor,2014).AccordingtoGentry(1973),theseechinate
pro-jectionsinthevalvesmayserveasprotectionagainstpredatorsto
allowtheripeningoffruitsandseeds.
Seedmorphologyandclassificationofthematureembryo
A.crucigerum presentswingedseedsalong thelengthofthe
fruitandoccupyingtheentirelocule(Fig.5C).Theseedspresent
abrownish-goldcolorandanevidentseminalnucleus(Fig.6A–D).
Theyhavebrighttranslucentwingsandpapyraceousconsistency
withapproximately5cminwidthand2.5cminheight.The
papil-lateseedcoatisanothersynapomorphyofthegenus(Lohmannand
Taylor,2014).Thewingsconsistoflateralexpansionofthe
tegu-mentandchalazalregion.Thenumberofcelllayersreducestoward
theedgeoftheseminalnucleusandofthewing,whereonlyone
celllayeroccurs(Fig.6E).
According to Fischer et al. (2004), in Pithecoctenium,
Anemopaegma and Jacaranda, the seminal body is enveloped
byalargewing.Thesamecanbeobservedforothertaxafrom
this family,suchasTabebuiaochracea (Sampaio etal.,2007), T.
chrysotrica(Souzaetal.,2005)andMacfadyenaunguis-cati(Souza
etal.,2008),wherethechalazalportionoftheseedexpandsand
becomespartofthewing,exceptinT.caraiba(FerreiraandCunha,
2000).However,insomeBignoniaceaethereisanalmostvestigial
chalazalexpansionof thewing,asin Tecomastans(Renòetal.,
2007).
Fruitanatomyandhistology
Pericarp
Thepericarpiscomposedofthreedifferentportions(Fig.7A).
Theouterportioncomprisestheexocarp.Belowexocarpoccursthe
mesocarp,dividedintothreeregions.Theinnerportioncomprises
theendocarp.
Theexocarpiscomposedofonetothreecelllayers.Lenticels
andemergencesarepresent(Fig.7B–D).Theouterpericlinalwall
ofthecellsisthickandlignified(Fig.7D).Stomatalguardcellsoccur
slightlyabovethesurfaceoftheexocarp(Fig.7D).
The outer mesocarp is formed during fruit differentiation
throughtheproliferationofoutertissue,resultinginhorn-like
pro-jections(Fig.7A).Theoutermesocarppresentsparenchymatous
cellsandclusteredstonescells(Fig.7B)thatformanalmost
con-tinuouslayer.Atthebaseofthehorn-likeprojections,thereare
layersofsclerifiedcells,demarcatingtheoutermesocarpfromthe
middlemesocarp(Fig.7AandE).Needle-likecrystalsarepresent
ontheoutermesocarpinaradialorganization(Fig.7F).
The middle mesocarpis composed of vascular bundles, and
parenchymatous tissue withthin sclerified walls (Fig. 7E).The
innermesocarpispredominantlycomposedoftissuesimilartothat
foundinthemiddlemesocarp,buttherearenovascularbundles
(Fig.7A).Inaddition,theinnermesocarppresentstwo
isodiamet-riccelllayerswiththickwalls.Theendocarpisformedbyasingle
20 R.Casotietal./RevistaBrasileiradeFarmacognosia26(2016)15–22
Fig.9.LongitudinalsectionoftheseedofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)testa;(B) wallthickening,afterpolarizedlight;(C)detailsoftherapheregion(testa);and (D)crystalsontestaandoncotyledon,afterpolarizedlight.cn,cotyledonnode;co, cotyledon;ed,endosperm;eh,hypocotylradicleaxis;ex,exotesta;de,cotyledon dorsalepidermis;et,endothelium;mt,mesotesta.
Seed
TheseedsareexalbuminousinA.crucigerum(Fig.8A),asthey
alsoareinTabebuiaochracea(Sampaioetal.,2007).Thisremnant
endospermisformedbyalayerofparenchymatouscellswithout
anytypeofnutritivereserve(Fig.8BandC).However,intheregion
neartotheraphe,theendospermpresentsthreeorfourcelllayers,
whichgraduallylessenuntilformingasinglecelllayer(Fig.8Eand
F).ThisfeatureistypicalinBignoniaceae,asdescribedbyCorner
(1976),Esau(1985)andJohrietal.(1992).
TheseauthorsreportBignoniaceaeseedsasexalbuminouswith
absent or scarce endosperm, except in some species, such as
Pyrostegiavenusta,whichpresentsanevidentendosperm(Gabrielli
andCastro,1995).
Theembryopresentsjuxtaposed,2-lobed,foliaceouscotyledons
fromtheapextothebase,andayellowish coriaceouswrapper.
Theembryosareonaverage0.8cminlength,0.6cminwidthand
0.1cminthickness(Fig.6CandD).Theembryopresentsa
contin-uousaxialandstraighthypocotyl-radicleaxis,whichisverysmall
incomparisontothecotyledonlobules(Figs.6Dand8A).In
con-trast,T.stanspresentsamoreevidenthypocotyl-radicleaxis(Renò
etal.,2007).Inthissection,embryospresentanoblong-transverse
andlenticularshape(Fig.8A),whicharefeaturesofBignoniaceae
(Barrosoet al.,1999; Ferreiraand Cunha,2000; Sampaioet al.,
2007).
Theseedisexotestal(Fig.8A–C),possessingelongatedcellswith
secondaryradialwallsintheformofbandswiththepresenceof
crystals(Fig.9A–D).Theparietalthickeningoftheexotestalcells
aremoredevelopedintheseminalnucleus,whichhasneverbeen
reportedforthisgenus.
In the mesotestal tissue composed of sclerenchymatous
parenchyma,maturecellsundergocompressionfromthe
expand-ingembryo (Figs. 8C,9A, C, and 10A, B). Themesotesta in the
chalazalregionpresentsagreaternumberofcellsandcell
rem-nants,incontrasttothemicropylarregion,whichpresentsonly
cellremnants(Fig.8AandD–F).
Thehistologicalanalysisrevealedphenoliccompoundsinthe
micropylarregionveryclosetothemesotestalcellscitedabove,
togetherwithcellremnantsfromthevasculartissueinthechalazal
region(Fig.8A,E,andF).Theendotestaisabsentbecauseinthis
familytheinnerepidermisisdestroyedduringthedevelopmentof
thegynophyte.
Fig.10.Longitudinalsectionthroughtheanteroposteriorplaneoftheseedof
Amphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Generalaspect;(B)distalregion(seedwing);(C) cotyledon;(D)endospermandendothelium.cn,cotyledonnode;co,cotyledon;ed, endosperm;eh,hypocotylradicleaxis;ex,exotesta;de,cotyledondorsalepidermis; et,endothelium;mt,mesotesta;ve,cotyledonventralepidermis.
The endothelium presents membranous layer of cells that
envelop the entire embryo (Fig. 10A). This structure presents
phenoliccompoundsthatacquireayellowishcolor,eveninthe
presenceoftoluidineblue(Fig.8E).
Thepresenceofanendotheliumandscarceendosperm(ab
ini-tio)iscommoninspecies ofBignoniaceae,whichareunitegmic
andtenuinucellate(Souzaetal.,2005;LohmannandTaylor,2014).
Pyrostegia venusta presents endosperm with two to six layers
(GabrielliandCastro,1995).
Inthelongitudinalsection,theepidermalcellsofthecotyledons
areslightlytangentiallyelongated,inboththedorsalandventral
region(Fig.10C).Themesophyllisparenchymatouswith
Fig.11.HistochemicalanalysisofembryoofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Dragendorff(alkaloids);(B)PAS(polysaccharides);(C)SudanIII(oils);and(D)Lugol(starch).
oils,aswellasascarcepresenceofstarch.PAS-positive
polysac-charideswereidentified onthecellwallsand inthecytoplasm
(Fig.11A–D).
InA.crucigerum,themembranouswrapperlocatedbetweenthe
embryoandthetestaissimilartothestructurefoundin
Bignoni-aceae,acommonfeatureinthefamily(GabrielliandCastro,1995;
Costa,2003;Souzaetal.,2005;Renòetal.,2007).This
membra-nouswrapperiscomposedofcellscontainingphenoliccompounds,
whichplayaroleinprotectingagainstpredatorsand
microorgan-isms,andincreasethehardnessofthetegumentandgivecolorto
theseed(BeltratiandPaoli,2006).
Understandingthe maingroups of secondary metabolitesin
medicinalplantsis importantas astarting point forstudies on
biologicalactivityorfortheisolationandidentificationof
bioac-tivecompounds,especiallythoseusedinfolkmedicine.Phenolic
compoundsarelinkedtoantioxidant,anti-inflammatoryand
anal-gesicactivities,amongmanyotherbiologicaleffects(DeOliveira
etal.,2012;Figueiredo-Rinheletal.,2013).Alkaloidsare
associ-atedtoagreaternumberofactivities,includingantimicrobialand
analgesicactivities(Huetal.,2013).Thus,thepresenceofthese
typesofcompoundscorroborateswiththeuseofthisspeciesin
folkmedicine.
Structuraldetailsofcellsarerelevantwhenobservingtornor
groundmaterial,bothforpharmacognosticcontrolandforquick
identification of species, as reported by Oliveira et al. (2003),
Verdametal.(2012),Jasinskietal.(2014),andSantosetal.(2015).
SeedsofA.crucigerumpresentmorphologicalandanatomical
fea-turescommontothefamily.In addition,specificfeatures allow
theidentificationandreliableanalysisofthespecies,including:
presenceoftrichomesintheovaryandpartofthenectary;large
quantityofcrystalsonfloraltissue;exotestalcellswithsecondary
radialwallswiththepresenceofcrystalsonseedwingsandthe
presenceofaremnantendospermintheseed;andapositivetest
foralkaloidsintheembryo.
Authors’contributions
RCcontributedtothecollectionofplantsamples,preparation
ofherbarium,runningthelaboratorywork,analysisofthedata
anddraftingthepaper.MPMandJMSOdesignedthestudy,
super-visedthelaboratoryworkandcontributed tocriticalreading of
themanuscript.Alltheauthorshavereadthefinalmanuscriptand
approvedthesubmission.
Conflictsofinterest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
Acknowledgments
TheauthorsthanktheFederalUniversityofSantaMariaand
CAPES(Coordenac¸ãodeAperfeic¸oamentodePessoaldeNível
Supe-rior)forfinancialsupport.
References
Armstrong,J.E.,1985.ThedelimitationofBignoniaceaeandScrophulariaceaebased onfloralanatomy,andtheplacementofproblemgenera.Am.J.Bot.72,755–766. Barroso,G.M.,Morim,M.P.,Peixoto,A.L.,Ichaso,C.L.F.,1999.FrutoseSementes:
MorfologiaAplicadaàSistemáticadeDicotiledôneas.UFV,Vic¸osa.
Beltrati,C.M.,Paoli,A.A.,2006.Semente.In:Appezzato-da-Glória,B., Carmello-Guerreiro,S.M.(Eds.),AnatomiaVegetal.UFV,Vic¸osa.
Brundrett,M.C.,Kendrick,B.,Peterson,C.A.,1991.Efficientlipidstaininginplant materialwithsudanred7Borfluorolyellow088inpolyethyleneglycolglycerol. Biotech.Histochem.66,111–116.
Bye,R.A.,1979.An1878ethnobotanicalcollectionfromSanLuisPotosi:Dr.Edward Palmer’sfirstmajormexicancollection.Econ.Bot.33,135–162.
Corner,E.J.H.,1976.TheSeedofDicotyledons.CambrigeUniversityPress,London. Costa, M.E., (Ph.D. thesis) 2003. Morfoanatomia e desenvolvimento dofruto,
sementeeplântuladeTabebuiaochracea(Chamisso)Standley(Bignoniaceae). GraduatePrograminBiologicalSciences,UniversidadeEstadualPaulista,Rio Claro,109pp.
DeOliveira,C.B.,Comunello,L.N.,Lunardelli,A.,Amaral,R.H.,Pires,M.G.S.,DaSilva, G.L.,Gosmann,G.,2012.PhenolicenrichedextractofBaccharistrimerapresents anti-inflammatoryandantioxidantactivities.Molecules17,1113–1123. Esau,K.,1985.AnatomíaVegetal.Omega,Barcelona.
Feder,N.,O’Brien,T.P.,1968.Plantmicrotechinique.Someprinciplesandnew meth-ods.Am.J.Bot.55,123–142.
Ferreira,R.A.,Cunha,M.C.L.,2000.Aspectosmorfológicosdesementes,plântulase desenvolvimentodamudadecraibeira(Tabebuiacaraiba(Mart.)Bur.)– Bignon-iaceaeepereiro(AspidospermapyrifoliumMart.)–Apocynaceae.Braz.SeedJ.22, 134–143.
Figueiredo-Rinhel,A.S.G.,Kabeya,L.M.,Bueno,P.C.P.,Jorge-Tiossi,R.F.,Azzolini, A.E.C.S.,Bastos,J.K.,Lucisano-Valim,Y.M.,2013.Inhibitionofthehuman neu-trophiloxidativemetabolismbyBaccharisdracunculifoliaDC(Asteraceae)is influencedbyseasonalityandtheratioofcaffeicacidtootherphenolic com-pounds.J.Ethnopharmacol.150,655–664.
Fischer,E.,Theisen,I.,Lohmann,L.G.,2004.Bignoniaceae.In:Kadereit,J.W.(Ed.),The FamiliesandGeneraofVascularPlants.Springer-Verlag,Heidelberg. Franco,I.J.,Fontana,V.L.,2005.ErvasePlantas:AMedicinadoSimples.LivrariaVida,
SãoPaulo.
Furr,M.,Mahlberg,P.G.,1981.Histochemicalanalysesoflaticifersandglandular trichomesinCannabissativa.J.Nat.Prod.44,153–158.
Gabriel,B.L.,1982.BiologicalElectronMicroscopy.VanNostrandReinholdCompany, NewYork.
Gabrielli,A.C.,Castro,M.M.,1995.AnatomiadasementemaduradePyrostegia venusta(Ker.)Miers–Bignoniaceae.Braz.J.Biol.18,227–234.
Galetto,L.,1995.NectarystructureandnectarfeaturesinsomeBignoniaceae.Plant Syst.Evol.196,99–121.
Gentry,A.H.,1973.GenericdelimitationsofCentralAmericanBignoniaceae. Britto-nia25,226–242.
Gentry, A.H.,1980. Bignoniaceae.Part I(Crescentieae and Tourretieae).Flora Neotropica.Monogr.25.TheNewYorkBotanicalGarden,NewYork. Gerrits,P.O.,Smid,L.,1983.Anewlesstoxicpolymerizationsystemforthe
embed-dingofsofttissuesinglycolmethacrylateandsubsequentpreparingofserial sections.J.Microsc.132,81–85.
22 R.Casotietal./RevistaBrasileiradeFarmacognosia26(2016)15–22
Jasinski, V.C.G., Silva, R.Z.D., Pontarolo, R., Budel, J.M., Campos, F.R., 2014. Morpho-anatomicalcharacteristicsofBaccharisglazioviiinsupportofits phar-macobotany.Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.24,609–616.
Jensen,W.A.,1962.BotanicalHistochemistry:PrinciplesandPractice.W.H.Freeman andCo.,SanFrancisco.
Johri,B.M.,Ambergaokar,K.B.,Srivastava,P.S.,1992.ComparativeEmbryologyof Angiosperms.Springer-Verlag,Berlin.
Lohmann,L.G.,2015.Bignoniaceae.In:ListadeespéciesdaFloradoBrasil.Jardim BotânicoRiodeJaneiro,http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov/2010/FB112461(accessed February,2015).
Lohmann,L.G.,2006.Untanglingthephylogenyofneotropicallianas(Bignonieae, Bignoniaceae).Am.J.Bot.93,304–318.
Lohmann,L.G.,Taylor,C.M.,2014.AnewgenericclassificationoftribeBignonieae (Bignoniaceae).Ann.MissouriBot.Gard.99,348–489.
Martin,F.,Hay,A.E.,Corno,L.,Gupta,M.P.,Hostettmann,K.,2007.Iridoidglycosides fromthestemsofPithecocteniumcrucigerum(Bignoniaceae).Phytochemistry 68,1307–1311.
Maia,V.,1979.TécnicaHistológica.Atheneu,SãoPaulo.
Nogueira,A.,El-Otra,J.H.L.,Guimarães,E.,Machado, S.R.,Lohmann,L.G.,2013. Trichome structure and evolution in Neotropical lianas. Ann. Bot. 112, 1331–1350.
O’Brien,T.P.,McCully,M.E.,1981. TheStudyofPlantStructure:Principlesand SelectedMethods.TemarcarphiPress,Melbourne.
Oliveira,T.B.,Neto,B.H.J.C.,Xaveier,M.A.,Garrote,C.F.D.,Asquieri,E.R.,Rezende, M.H.,Ferreira,H.D.,Paula,J.R.,2003.EstudoFarmacognósticodasraízesde JacarandadecurrensCham(carobinha).Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.13,54–55.
Pool,A.,2007.ArevisionofthegenusPithecoctenium(Bignoniaceae).Ann.Missouri Bot.Gard.94,622–642.
Renò,L.R.,Mosqueta,I.S.,Braccini,A.L.,2007.Morfo-anatomiadofrutoesementes deamarelinho(Tecomastans(L.)Kunth–Bignoniaceae).Braz.SeedJ.29,18–30. Rivera,G.L.,2000.NuptialnectarystructureofBignoniaceaeofArgentina.
Darwini-ana38,227–239.
Sampaio,D.S.,Costa,M.E.,Paoli,A.A.S.,2007.OntogeniadasementedeTabebuia ochracea(Cham.)Standl(Bignoniaceae).Braz.J.Biol.30,289–302.
Sandwith,N.Y.,Hunt,D.R.,1974.FloraCatarinense.IParte:AsPlantas.Bign.Itajaí, Fascicle.
Santos,V.L.,Franco,C.R.,Amano,E.,Messias-Reason,I.J.,Budel,J.M.,2015. Anatom-icalinvestigationsofPiperamalago(jaborandi-manso)forthequalitycontrol. Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.25,85–91.
Souza,L.A.,Iwazaki,M.C.,Moscheta,I.,2005.Morphologyofthepericarpandseed ofTabebuiachrysotricha(Mart.exDC.)Standl(Bignoniaceae).Braz.Arch.Biol. Technol.48,407–418.
Souza,L.A.,Oyama,S.D.O.,Muneratto,J.C.,2008.Morphologyandanatomyofthe developingfruitofMacfadyenaunguis-cati(l.)A.H.Gentry,Bignoniaceae.Acta Bot.Venez.31,1–14.
Verdam,M.C.S.,Ohana,D.T.,Araújo,M.G.P.,Guilhon-Simplicio,F.,De-Mendonc¸a, M.S.,Pereira,M.M.,2012.MorphologyandanatomyofJusticiaacuminatissima leaves.Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.22,1212–1218.
VonPoser,G.L.,Schripsema,J.,Henriques,A.T.,Jensen,S.R.,2000.Thedistributionof iridoidsinBignoniaceae.Biochem.Syst.Ecol.28,351–366.