• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. farmacogn. vol.26 número1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. farmacogn. vol.26 número1"

Copied!
8
0
0

Texto

(1)

Original

Article

Ovary

and

fruit

morphology

and

anatomy

of

Amphilophium

crucigerum

Rosana

Casoti

a

,

Melânia

Palermo

Manfron

a,∗

,

João

Marcelo

Santos

de

Oliveira

b aLaboratóriodeFarmacognosia,UniversidadeFederaldeSantaMaria,SantaMaria,RS,Brazil

bLaboratóriodeBotânicaEstrutural,UniversidadeFederaldeSantaMaria,SantaMaria,RS,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received2April2015 Accepted6August2015

Availableonline28September2015

Keywords:

Crystals Histochemical Morphoanatomy Ovary Seed Trichomes

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Amphilophiumcrucigerum(L.)L.G.Lohmann,knownas“pente-de-macaco”isaspeciesofBignoniaceae nativetoBrazil,andwhoseseedsareusedinfolkmedicine.Thisstudyaimedtodescribe morphoanatomi-calfeaturesofthisspeciesoffruittoaidinitscorrectidentificationandpharmacognosticanalysis.Samples ofovary,pericarpandseedwerefixedwith3%glutaraldehyde,sectionedonarotarymicrotomeand ana-lyzedbystereomicroscope.Theresultsareshowninthreeparts:(1)Theovarypresentspeltatetrichomes, longnon-glandulartrichomesandemergencesintheepidermis;itis2-carpellateandunilocularwithtwo intrudingparietalplacenta;ovulesarenumerousontheplacenta;itpresentsalargequantityofcrystals. (2)Thepericarpiswoody,denselyechinateandellipticshape;itpresentsa2-valvedcapsuleandis septi-cidal;itpresentsemergences,stomata,lenticels,crystalsandalargequantityofclusteredstonescells.(3) Seedsarealate,exalbuminateandexotestal;thereisalargeamountofcrystalsintheexotestalregion;it presentsanendotheliumandremnantendosperm.Histochemicaltestsshowedthepresenceoflipophilic substances,polysaccharides,phenolicsubstances,alkaloidsandasmallquantityofstarch.These phar-macobotanicalfeaturesdescribedforA.crucigerumareessentialforthepharmacognosticanalysisofthe drugplant.

©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeFarmacognosia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.

Introduction

The Bignoniaceae family is composed of approximately 406

species,predominantlyneotropical(Lohmann,2015).Onlythree

tribesofthisfamilyoccurinBrazil:Tecomeae,Crescentieaeand

Bignonieae (Sandwith and Hunt,1974; Von Poseret al., 2000).

Amphilophiumcrucigerum(L.)L.G.Lohmannbelongstothe

Bignon-ieaetribe,whosegenusiscomposedof28lianaspecies(Lohmann,

2015). A. crucigerum presents synonymy with Pithecoctenium echinatumandPithecocteniumcrucigerumamongseveralother

syn-onyms(Lohmann,2015).

Thisspeciesfrequentlygrowsonforestclearingsandonthe

bor-dersofhighways.ItbloomsfromOctobertoDecember.InBrazil,A.

crucigerumispopularlyknownas“pente-de-macaco”andis

cul-tivatedasornamental(Sandwith andHunt,1974).Itsfruitsare

usedinfolkmedicinetotreatneuralgia(Bye,1979),inflammations,

skininfectionsandheadachesandasacalmingagent(Francoand

Fontana,2005).

The Bignoniaceae species typically present iridoids,

alka-loids, flavones, naphthaquinones, anthraquinones, tannins, and

∗ Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:[email protected](M.P.Manfron).

anthocyanins(Fischeretal.,2004).Iridoidglycosideswereisolated

from stems of A. crucigerum, showing an antioxidant potential

againstDPPH,bybioautography,andagainstacetylcholinesterase

inhibitors(Martinetal.,2007).

Despite the pharmacological potential attributed to A.

cru-cigerum,therearenoreportstodatedescribingdiagnosticfeatures

fordiscriminatingthisspecies.Delimitingthegenericlevelofthe

BignonieaetribehasalwaysbeenaproblemaccordingtoLohmann

(2006),duetothelackofdiagnosticfeaturesandbecauseof

over-lappingpatternsofmorphologicalvariationwhichmakeitdifficult

toidentify.Thepresentstudyaimstocharacterizethe

morpho-logical and anatomical featuresof theovary,pericarp andseed

ofA.crucigerum,describingusefulstructuralfeaturesinorderto

improve its descriptionand identification,as wellto present a

histochemicalanalysis.Thesefeaturesareessentialforthe

phar-macognosticanalysisofthedrugplant.

Materialandmethods

Plantmaterial

Amphilophiumcrucigerum(L.)L.G.Lohmann,Bignoniaceae,was

obtainedfromtheSouthernregionofBrazil,at29◦4102′′Sand

53◦4825′′W.Theflowersandmaturefruits,fromsevenindividuals,

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2015.08.006

(2)

16 R.Casotietal./RevistaBrasileiradeFarmacognosia26(2016)15–22

Fig.1.DissectedflowerofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Generalaspectofthegynoecium;(B)ovaryshowingtrichomes(25×);and(C)cross-sectionofovary(35×).

werecollectedfromNovembertoMarch.Thecollectedmaterial

wasidentifiedby GilbertoDolejal Zanettiandthevoucher was

registeredundernumber 12872 SMDBattheherbarium ofthe

BiologyDepartmentattheFederalUniversityofSantaMaria.

Morphologicalandanatomicalcharacterization

AfterdissectionwithstereomicroscopeSZH10(Olympus®

)and

M80(Leica®),thesampleswerefixedin3%glutaraldehydein0.1M

sodiumphosphatebuffer,pH7.2(Gabriel,1982)andsubmittedto

vacuumfor6hforimprovedinfiltration.Subsequently,thesamples

werewashedin0.1Msodiumphosphatebuffer,pH7.2(Gabriel,

1982),andthenindistilledwater.Tween20wasutilizedduring

24hforextractionofepicuticularwaxes.Subsequently,the

sam-plesunderwentdehydrationinanethylalcoholseries,followedby

solutionsofchloroformandpureethanol(1:3,1:1,3:1,1:1,1:3),

andfinallyofpureethanol.Thesampleswerepre-infiltratedina

2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate(HEMA)andpureethanolsolution(1:1)

during12h,followedinpureHEMAandembeddinginthesame

resin,inaTeflonholderuntilreachingpolymerization(Gerritsand

Smid,1983).Sectionsof5␮mthicknessweremadeusingaRM2245

rotarymicrotome(Leica®).ToluidineblueOin0.05%sodium

ben-zoatebuffer,pH4.4wasusedforstaining(FederandO’Brien,1968).

PermanentslidesweredepositedinthecollectionattheStructural

BotanyLaboratoryoftheBiologyDepartment,UFSM.Observations

andphotomicrographsinbrightfieldandpolarizedlightwere

per-formedusingaDM2000microscope(Leica®

)withaDFC295image

capturesystem(Leica®).

Histochemicalanalysis

Handsectionsofseedswerepreparedforhistochemicaltestsfor

differentpurposes:Lugol’ssolutionforstarch(Jensen,1962);Sudan

IIItodetectlipophilicsubstances(Brundrettetal.,1991);

Dragen-dorfftodetectalkaloids(FurrandMahlberg,1981);PAS(periodic

acid-Schiff)todetecttotalpolysaccharides(Maia,1979)and

tolui-dineblueforlignins,pectinsandphenoliccompounds(O’Brienand

McCully,1981).

Resultsanddiscussion

Gynoeciummorphology

Thestigmais2-lobed(Fig.1A).Theyellowishanddenselyhairy

ovaryissuperiorandcylindricalinthetransversalsection(Fig.1B

andC).Thetrichomes,situatedintheovary,reflectedlightwhen

observedunderthemagnifyingglass(Fig.1BandC).

Arelativelywell-developedring-shapednectaryispresentat

thebaseoftheovary(Fig.1A),wheretherearestomataand

tri-chomessimilartothosefoundintheovary.Thetypeofnectaryand

thepresenceoftrichomesinthenectaryareconsideredinvariable

features,makingthemimportantinthedeterminationofspeciesof

differentgenera,includingAmphilophium(Rivera,2000).Someof

thefeaturesdescribedabovewerealsodescribedforgenus

deter-minationbySandwithandHunt(1974),Galetto(1995),Nogueira

etal.(2013)andLohmannandTaylor(2014).

Ovaryanatomy

Theovaryis2-carpellate,unilocularandplurispermic,withtwo

intrudingparietalplacenta(Fig.2AandB),similartothatdescribed

byFischeretal.(2004).Theovulesareanatropous(Fig.2C).

Theouterepidermisiscomposedofonecelllayer,andpresents

alargequantityofnon-glandulartrichomes(Fig.3AandD).These

trichomesaremulticellular,longandnon-branched.Studiescarried

outbyNogueiraetal.(2013),inleavesofA.crucigerum,showedthe

presenceofbranchednon-glandulartrichomes.Inthenectarywas

observedstomata(Fig.3E).

Intheovary,emergenceswerealsoobserved,besidesa

rela-tivelyfewernumberofglandulartrichomesatdifferentstagesof

(3)

Fig.3.LongitudinalsectionoftheovaryofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Generalaspectofovary;(B)outerepidermis;(C)trichomeandemergence;(D)outerepidermis withcrystals;and(E)stomata.cr,crystals;em,emergence;ep,epidermiscells;gt,glandulartrichomes;mp,mesophyll;ne,nectary;ov,ovule;st,stomata;tr,trichomes.

development(Fig.3BandD).Theemergencespossesswidebases

and the subepidermal cells are only partof thebase, possibly

derivedfromoneortwosubepidermalcells(Fig.3C).Alarge

por-tionofthisstructureismadeofcellsderivedfromtheepidermis.

Thearrangementandsizeofthesecellsareirregular.Inaddition,

theemergencespresentasharpapexdefinedbyasinglecell.

Theglandulartrichomeisapeltatemorphotype,composedof

sixcellslocatedontheheadofthetrichomeandasinglecellon

thestalk(Fig.3B).AccordingtoNogueiraetal.(2013),thepresence

ofpeltatetrichomesisverycommoninspeciesoftheBignonieae

tribe.Thepresenceoftrichomesisoftenassociatedwithdesiccation

and/orprotectionagainstherbivores(Wagneretal.,2004).

The mesophyll is composed of parenchymatous tissue

(Figs. 2A and 3A). The marginal vascular bundles bifurcate

radiallywithhalfofthebundlefacingtowardacentralposition

neartheplacentae.Thus,theovaryhastwoventrallargevascular

bundlesandtwolargedorsalvascularbundlesonthecarpelwall,

Fig.4.LongitudinalsectionoftheovaryofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Detailof parenchymaticandvasculartissueswithcrystalaccumulation(brightfield)and(B) crystalsintheparenchymatictissueandinvascularbundlesafterpolarizedlight. cr,crystals;vb,vascularbundle.

besidesmanysmalllateralvascularbundlesfoundontheovary

wall(Figs.2Aand3A).

Numerouscrystalliferouscellsoccurinthemesophyll(Fig.2B).

There is also a large accumulation of calcium oxalate crystals

on the vascular tissue, which apparently obliterate some

ves-selelements,andtherefore,withoutanidentifiableformortype

(Figs.2Band4AandB).Theinnerepidermispresentsisodiametric

cellsthatdevelopvacuoles.Theepidermis,whichcoversthe

pla-centa,presentscellswithdensecytoplasmthataresmallerthan

thelocularcells (Fig.2B). Theovulesareanatropous,unitegmic

and tenuinucellate. They are located on the placenta and are

numerous (Fig. 3A). Part of the results is in agreement with

thoseusuallydescribedforBignoniaceaeandBignonieae(Corner,

1976;Armstrong,1985;Fischeretal.,2004,LohmannandTaylor,

2014).

(4)

18 R.Casotietal./RevistaBrasileiradeFarmacognosia26(2016)15–22

Fig.6. SeedsofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Generalaspectofseed:dorsalface;(B)generalaspectofseed:ventralface;(C)embryocoveredcoriaceouswrapper:raphe; (D)embryocoveredcoriaceouswrapper:anti-raphe;and(E)wingfrontview.

Fruitmorphology

Pericarp

Thefruitiselliptic,woodyanddenselyechinatewith

approx-imately12cminlength,6cminwidthand2cminthickness,in

themedianregion.Itiscomposedofa2-valvedcapsuleslightly

flattenedwithathickpericarpandaseminiferouscolumn(Fig.5A

andC).

Thefruitsaresepticidalcapsules,whichisoneofthekey

identi-fyingfeaturesfortheBignonieaetribe(Gentry,1980;Barrosoetal.,

1999;Fischeretal.,2004).Thepericarpsarebiconvexwithadorsal

vascularbundle.Thefruitisgreenish-browntorust-colored,when

dry.

AmongthemainfeaturesofA.crucigerumfruit,thereare

echi-nate(horn-like)projectionsoftheexocarp,whichisconsideredas

morphologicalsynapomorphiesinthisgenus(Pool,2007;Lohmann

(5)

Fig.8.LongitudinalsectionsthroughthelateralplaneoftheseedsofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Generalaspect;(B)testa;(C)endospermandendothelium;(D)detail ofthecotyledonnode;(E)hypocotylradicleaxis;and(F)calazalregion.cn,cotyledonnode;co,cotyledon;de,cotyledondorsalepidermis;eb,embryo;ed,endosperm;eh, hypocotylradicleaxis;et,endothelium;ex,exotesta;mt,mesotesta;t,testa.

andTaylor,2014).AccordingtoGentry(1973),theseechinate

pro-jectionsinthevalvesmayserveasprotectionagainstpredatorsto

allowtheripeningoffruitsandseeds.

Seedmorphologyandclassificationofthematureembryo

A.crucigerum presentswingedseedsalong thelengthofthe

fruitandoccupyingtheentirelocule(Fig.5C).Theseedspresent

abrownish-goldcolorandanevidentseminalnucleus(Fig.6A–D).

Theyhavebrighttranslucentwingsandpapyraceousconsistency

withapproximately5cminwidthand2.5cminheight.The

papil-lateseedcoatisanothersynapomorphyofthegenus(Lohmannand

Taylor,2014).Thewingsconsistoflateralexpansionofthe

tegu-mentandchalazalregion.Thenumberofcelllayersreducestoward

theedgeoftheseminalnucleusandofthewing,whereonlyone

celllayeroccurs(Fig.6E).

According to Fischer et al. (2004), in Pithecoctenium,

Anemopaegma and Jacaranda, the seminal body is enveloped

byalargewing.Thesamecanbeobservedforothertaxafrom

this family,suchasTabebuiaochracea (Sampaio etal.,2007), T.

chrysotrica(Souzaetal.,2005)andMacfadyenaunguis-cati(Souza

etal.,2008),wherethechalazalportionoftheseedexpandsand

becomespartofthewing,exceptinT.caraiba(FerreiraandCunha,

2000).However,insomeBignoniaceaethereisanalmostvestigial

chalazalexpansionof thewing,asin Tecomastans(Renòetal.,

2007).

Fruitanatomyandhistology

Pericarp

Thepericarpiscomposedofthreedifferentportions(Fig.7A).

Theouterportioncomprisestheexocarp.Belowexocarpoccursthe

mesocarp,dividedintothreeregions.Theinnerportioncomprises

theendocarp.

Theexocarpiscomposedofonetothreecelllayers.Lenticels

andemergencesarepresent(Fig.7B–D).Theouterpericlinalwall

ofthecellsisthickandlignified(Fig.7D).Stomatalguardcellsoccur

slightlyabovethesurfaceoftheexocarp(Fig.7D).

The outer mesocarp is formed during fruit differentiation

throughtheproliferationofoutertissue,resultinginhorn-like

pro-jections(Fig.7A).Theoutermesocarppresentsparenchymatous

cellsandclusteredstonescells(Fig.7B)thatformanalmost

con-tinuouslayer.Atthebaseofthehorn-likeprojections,thereare

layersofsclerifiedcells,demarcatingtheoutermesocarpfromthe

middlemesocarp(Fig.7AandE).Needle-likecrystalsarepresent

ontheoutermesocarpinaradialorganization(Fig.7F).

The middle mesocarpis composed of vascular bundles, and

parenchymatous tissue withthin sclerified walls (Fig. 7E).The

innermesocarpispredominantlycomposedoftissuesimilartothat

foundinthemiddlemesocarp,buttherearenovascularbundles

(Fig.7A).Inaddition,theinnermesocarppresentstwo

isodiamet-riccelllayerswiththickwalls.Theendocarpisformedbyasingle

(6)

20 R.Casotietal./RevistaBrasileiradeFarmacognosia26(2016)15–22

Fig.9.LongitudinalsectionoftheseedofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)testa;(B) wallthickening,afterpolarizedlight;(C)detailsoftherapheregion(testa);and (D)crystalsontestaandoncotyledon,afterpolarizedlight.cn,cotyledonnode;co, cotyledon;ed,endosperm;eh,hypocotylradicleaxis;ex,exotesta;de,cotyledon dorsalepidermis;et,endothelium;mt,mesotesta.

Seed

TheseedsareexalbuminousinA.crucigerum(Fig.8A),asthey

alsoareinTabebuiaochracea(Sampaioetal.,2007).Thisremnant

endospermisformedbyalayerofparenchymatouscellswithout

anytypeofnutritivereserve(Fig.8BandC).However,intheregion

neartotheraphe,theendospermpresentsthreeorfourcelllayers,

whichgraduallylessenuntilformingasinglecelllayer(Fig.8Eand

F).ThisfeatureistypicalinBignoniaceae,asdescribedbyCorner

(1976),Esau(1985)andJohrietal.(1992).

TheseauthorsreportBignoniaceaeseedsasexalbuminouswith

absent or scarce endosperm, except in some species, such as

Pyrostegiavenusta,whichpresentsanevidentendosperm(Gabrielli

andCastro,1995).

Theembryopresentsjuxtaposed,2-lobed,foliaceouscotyledons

fromtheapextothebase,andayellowish coriaceouswrapper.

Theembryosareonaverage0.8cminlength,0.6cminwidthand

0.1cminthickness(Fig.6CandD).Theembryopresentsa

contin-uousaxialandstraighthypocotyl-radicleaxis,whichisverysmall

incomparisontothecotyledonlobules(Figs.6Dand8A).In

con-trast,T.stanspresentsamoreevidenthypocotyl-radicleaxis(Renò

etal.,2007).Inthissection,embryospresentanoblong-transverse

andlenticularshape(Fig.8A),whicharefeaturesofBignoniaceae

(Barrosoet al.,1999; Ferreiraand Cunha,2000; Sampaioet al.,

2007).

Theseedisexotestal(Fig.8A–C),possessingelongatedcellswith

secondaryradialwallsintheformofbandswiththepresenceof

crystals(Fig.9A–D).Theparietalthickeningoftheexotestalcells

aremoredevelopedintheseminalnucleus,whichhasneverbeen

reportedforthisgenus.

In the mesotestal tissue composed of sclerenchymatous

parenchyma,maturecellsundergocompressionfromthe

expand-ingembryo (Figs. 8C,9A, C, and 10A, B). Themesotesta in the

chalazalregionpresentsagreaternumberofcellsandcell

rem-nants,incontrasttothemicropylarregion,whichpresentsonly

cellremnants(Fig.8AandD–F).

Thehistologicalanalysisrevealedphenoliccompoundsinthe

micropylarregionveryclosetothemesotestalcellscitedabove,

togetherwithcellremnantsfromthevasculartissueinthechalazal

region(Fig.8A,E,andF).Theendotestaisabsentbecauseinthis

familytheinnerepidermisisdestroyedduringthedevelopmentof

thegynophyte.

Fig.10.Longitudinalsectionthroughtheanteroposteriorplaneoftheseedof

Amphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Generalaspect;(B)distalregion(seedwing);(C) cotyledon;(D)endospermandendothelium.cn,cotyledonnode;co,cotyledon;ed, endosperm;eh,hypocotylradicleaxis;ex,exotesta;de,cotyledondorsalepidermis; et,endothelium;mt,mesotesta;ve,cotyledonventralepidermis.

The endothelium presents membranous layer of cells that

envelop the entire embryo (Fig. 10A). This structure presents

phenoliccompoundsthatacquireayellowishcolor,eveninthe

presenceoftoluidineblue(Fig.8E).

Thepresenceofanendotheliumandscarceendosperm(ab

ini-tio)iscommoninspecies ofBignoniaceae,whichareunitegmic

andtenuinucellate(Souzaetal.,2005;LohmannandTaylor,2014).

Pyrostegia venusta presents endosperm with two to six layers

(GabrielliandCastro,1995).

Inthelongitudinalsection,theepidermalcellsofthecotyledons

areslightlytangentiallyelongated,inboththedorsalandventral

region(Fig.10C).Themesophyllisparenchymatouswith

(7)

Fig.11.HistochemicalanalysisofembryoofAmphilophiumcrucigerum.(A)Dragendorff(alkaloids);(B)PAS(polysaccharides);(C)SudanIII(oils);and(D)Lugol(starch).

oils,aswellasascarcepresenceofstarch.PAS-positive

polysac-charideswereidentified onthecellwallsand inthecytoplasm

(Fig.11A–D).

InA.crucigerum,themembranouswrapperlocatedbetweenthe

embryoandthetestaissimilartothestructurefoundin

Bignoni-aceae,acommonfeatureinthefamily(GabrielliandCastro,1995;

Costa,2003;Souzaetal.,2005;Renòetal.,2007).This

membra-nouswrapperiscomposedofcellscontainingphenoliccompounds,

whichplayaroleinprotectingagainstpredatorsand

microorgan-isms,andincreasethehardnessofthetegumentandgivecolorto

theseed(BeltratiandPaoli,2006).

Understandingthe maingroups of secondary metabolitesin

medicinalplantsis importantas astarting point forstudies on

biologicalactivityorfortheisolationandidentificationof

bioac-tivecompounds,especiallythoseusedinfolkmedicine.Phenolic

compoundsarelinkedtoantioxidant,anti-inflammatoryand

anal-gesicactivities,amongmanyotherbiologicaleffects(DeOliveira

etal.,2012;Figueiredo-Rinheletal.,2013).Alkaloidsare

associ-atedtoagreaternumberofactivities,includingantimicrobialand

analgesicactivities(Huetal.,2013).Thus,thepresenceofthese

typesofcompoundscorroborateswiththeuseofthisspeciesin

folkmedicine.

Structuraldetailsofcellsarerelevantwhenobservingtornor

groundmaterial,bothforpharmacognosticcontrolandforquick

identification of species, as reported by Oliveira et al. (2003),

Verdametal.(2012),Jasinskietal.(2014),andSantosetal.(2015).

SeedsofA.crucigerumpresentmorphologicalandanatomical

fea-turescommontothefamily.In addition,specificfeatures allow

theidentificationandreliableanalysisofthespecies,including:

presenceoftrichomesintheovaryandpartofthenectary;large

quantityofcrystalsonfloraltissue;exotestalcellswithsecondary

radialwallswiththepresenceofcrystalsonseedwingsandthe

presenceofaremnantendospermintheseed;andapositivetest

foralkaloidsintheembryo.

Authors’contributions

RCcontributedtothecollectionofplantsamples,preparation

ofherbarium,runningthelaboratorywork,analysisofthedata

anddraftingthepaper.MPMandJMSOdesignedthestudy,

super-visedthelaboratoryworkandcontributed tocriticalreading of

themanuscript.Alltheauthorshavereadthefinalmanuscriptand

approvedthesubmission.

Conflictsofinterest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

Acknowledgments

TheauthorsthanktheFederalUniversityofSantaMariaand

CAPES(Coordenac¸ãodeAperfeic¸oamentodePessoaldeNível

Supe-rior)forfinancialsupport.

References

Armstrong,J.E.,1985.ThedelimitationofBignoniaceaeandScrophulariaceaebased onfloralanatomy,andtheplacementofproblemgenera.Am.J.Bot.72,755–766. Barroso,G.M.,Morim,M.P.,Peixoto,A.L.,Ichaso,C.L.F.,1999.FrutoseSementes:

MorfologiaAplicadaàSistemáticadeDicotiledôneas.UFV,Vic¸osa.

Beltrati,C.M.,Paoli,A.A.,2006.Semente.In:Appezzato-da-Glória,B., Carmello-Guerreiro,S.M.(Eds.),AnatomiaVegetal.UFV,Vic¸osa.

Brundrett,M.C.,Kendrick,B.,Peterson,C.A.,1991.Efficientlipidstaininginplant materialwithsudanred7Borfluorolyellow088inpolyethyleneglycolglycerol. Biotech.Histochem.66,111–116.

Bye,R.A.,1979.An1878ethnobotanicalcollectionfromSanLuisPotosi:Dr.Edward Palmer’sfirstmajormexicancollection.Econ.Bot.33,135–162.

Corner,E.J.H.,1976.TheSeedofDicotyledons.CambrigeUniversityPress,London. Costa, M.E., (Ph.D. thesis) 2003. Morfoanatomia e desenvolvimento dofruto,

sementeeplântuladeTabebuiaochracea(Chamisso)Standley(Bignoniaceae). GraduatePrograminBiologicalSciences,UniversidadeEstadualPaulista,Rio Claro,109pp.

DeOliveira,C.B.,Comunello,L.N.,Lunardelli,A.,Amaral,R.H.,Pires,M.G.S.,DaSilva, G.L.,Gosmann,G.,2012.PhenolicenrichedextractofBaccharistrimerapresents anti-inflammatoryandantioxidantactivities.Molecules17,1113–1123. Esau,K.,1985.AnatomíaVegetal.Omega,Barcelona.

Feder,N.,O’Brien,T.P.,1968.Plantmicrotechinique.Someprinciplesandnew meth-ods.Am.J.Bot.55,123–142.

Ferreira,R.A.,Cunha,M.C.L.,2000.Aspectosmorfológicosdesementes,plântulase desenvolvimentodamudadecraibeira(Tabebuiacaraiba(Mart.)Bur.)– Bignon-iaceaeepereiro(AspidospermapyrifoliumMart.)–Apocynaceae.Braz.SeedJ.22, 134–143.

Figueiredo-Rinhel,A.S.G.,Kabeya,L.M.,Bueno,P.C.P.,Jorge-Tiossi,R.F.,Azzolini, A.E.C.S.,Bastos,J.K.,Lucisano-Valim,Y.M.,2013.Inhibitionofthehuman neu-trophiloxidativemetabolismbyBaccharisdracunculifoliaDC(Asteraceae)is influencedbyseasonalityandtheratioofcaffeicacidtootherphenolic com-pounds.J.Ethnopharmacol.150,655–664.

Fischer,E.,Theisen,I.,Lohmann,L.G.,2004.Bignoniaceae.In:Kadereit,J.W.(Ed.),The FamiliesandGeneraofVascularPlants.Springer-Verlag,Heidelberg. Franco,I.J.,Fontana,V.L.,2005.ErvasePlantas:AMedicinadoSimples.LivrariaVida,

SãoPaulo.

Furr,M.,Mahlberg,P.G.,1981.Histochemicalanalysesoflaticifersandglandular trichomesinCannabissativa.J.Nat.Prod.44,153–158.

Gabriel,B.L.,1982.BiologicalElectronMicroscopy.VanNostrandReinholdCompany, NewYork.

Gabrielli,A.C.,Castro,M.M.,1995.AnatomiadasementemaduradePyrostegia venusta(Ker.)Miers–Bignoniaceae.Braz.J.Biol.18,227–234.

Galetto,L.,1995.NectarystructureandnectarfeaturesinsomeBignoniaceae.Plant Syst.Evol.196,99–121.

Gentry,A.H.,1973.GenericdelimitationsofCentralAmericanBignoniaceae. Britto-nia25,226–242.

Gentry, A.H.,1980. Bignoniaceae.Part I(Crescentieae and Tourretieae).Flora Neotropica.Monogr.25.TheNewYorkBotanicalGarden,NewYork. Gerrits,P.O.,Smid,L.,1983.Anewlesstoxicpolymerizationsystemforthe

embed-dingofsofttissuesinglycolmethacrylateandsubsequentpreparingofserial sections.J.Microsc.132,81–85.

(8)

22 R.Casotietal./RevistaBrasileiradeFarmacognosia26(2016)15–22

Jasinski, V.C.G., Silva, R.Z.D., Pontarolo, R., Budel, J.M., Campos, F.R., 2014. Morpho-anatomicalcharacteristicsofBaccharisglazioviiinsupportofits phar-macobotany.Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.24,609–616.

Jensen,W.A.,1962.BotanicalHistochemistry:PrinciplesandPractice.W.H.Freeman andCo.,SanFrancisco.

Johri,B.M.,Ambergaokar,K.B.,Srivastava,P.S.,1992.ComparativeEmbryologyof Angiosperms.Springer-Verlag,Berlin.

Lohmann,L.G.,2015.Bignoniaceae.In:ListadeespéciesdaFloradoBrasil.Jardim BotânicoRiodeJaneiro,http://floradobrasil.jbrj.gov/2010/FB112461(accessed February,2015).

Lohmann,L.G.,2006.Untanglingthephylogenyofneotropicallianas(Bignonieae, Bignoniaceae).Am.J.Bot.93,304–318.

Lohmann,L.G.,Taylor,C.M.,2014.AnewgenericclassificationoftribeBignonieae (Bignoniaceae).Ann.MissouriBot.Gard.99,348–489.

Martin,F.,Hay,A.E.,Corno,L.,Gupta,M.P.,Hostettmann,K.,2007.Iridoidglycosides fromthestemsofPithecocteniumcrucigerum(Bignoniaceae).Phytochemistry 68,1307–1311.

Maia,V.,1979.TécnicaHistológica.Atheneu,SãoPaulo.

Nogueira,A.,El-Otra,J.H.L.,Guimarães,E.,Machado, S.R.,Lohmann,L.G.,2013. Trichome structure and evolution in Neotropical lianas. Ann. Bot. 112, 1331–1350.

O’Brien,T.P.,McCully,M.E.,1981. TheStudyofPlantStructure:Principlesand SelectedMethods.TemarcarphiPress,Melbourne.

Oliveira,T.B.,Neto,B.H.J.C.,Xaveier,M.A.,Garrote,C.F.D.,Asquieri,E.R.,Rezende, M.H.,Ferreira,H.D.,Paula,J.R.,2003.EstudoFarmacognósticodasraízesde JacarandadecurrensCham(carobinha).Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.13,54–55.

Pool,A.,2007.ArevisionofthegenusPithecoctenium(Bignoniaceae).Ann.Missouri Bot.Gard.94,622–642.

Renò,L.R.,Mosqueta,I.S.,Braccini,A.L.,2007.Morfo-anatomiadofrutoesementes deamarelinho(Tecomastans(L.)Kunth–Bignoniaceae).Braz.SeedJ.29,18–30. Rivera,G.L.,2000.NuptialnectarystructureofBignoniaceaeofArgentina.

Darwini-ana38,227–239.

Sampaio,D.S.,Costa,M.E.,Paoli,A.A.S.,2007.OntogeniadasementedeTabebuia ochracea(Cham.)Standl(Bignoniaceae).Braz.J.Biol.30,289–302.

Sandwith,N.Y.,Hunt,D.R.,1974.FloraCatarinense.IParte:AsPlantas.Bign.Itajaí, Fascicle.

Santos,V.L.,Franco,C.R.,Amano,E.,Messias-Reason,I.J.,Budel,J.M.,2015. Anatom-icalinvestigationsofPiperamalago(jaborandi-manso)forthequalitycontrol. Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.25,85–91.

Souza,L.A.,Iwazaki,M.C.,Moscheta,I.,2005.Morphologyofthepericarpandseed ofTabebuiachrysotricha(Mart.exDC.)Standl(Bignoniaceae).Braz.Arch.Biol. Technol.48,407–418.

Souza,L.A.,Oyama,S.D.O.,Muneratto,J.C.,2008.Morphologyandanatomyofthe developingfruitofMacfadyenaunguis-cati(l.)A.H.Gentry,Bignoniaceae.Acta Bot.Venez.31,1–14.

Verdam,M.C.S.,Ohana,D.T.,Araújo,M.G.P.,Guilhon-Simplicio,F.,De-Mendonc¸a, M.S.,Pereira,M.M.,2012.MorphologyandanatomyofJusticiaacuminatissima leaves.Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.22,1212–1218.

VonPoser,G.L.,Schripsema,J.,Henriques,A.T.,Jensen,S.R.,2000.Thedistributionof iridoidsinBignoniaceae.Biochem.Syst.Ecol.28,351–366.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Not all of the compounds showed a promising TNF-␣ inhibitory activ- ity except gallic acid, ferulic acid, caffeic acid and p -coumaric acid up to 30–40% at 10 ␮M concentrations, also

After the characterization of essential oil and fractions obtained from the ethanol extract and hydrolate, samples CAEO, CAEE, PEDCM, PEEA and PEB were tested on different tumor

crus-galli grains as a remedy for cancer ( ’t Mannetje and Jones, 1992 ), and to specify the compounds responsible for its cytotoxic activity against four human cancer cell lines;

The dose uniformity was determined by measuring the content of total phenolic compounds expressed in swertisin by a validated HPLC method, as well as the dissolution profile.. The

The biological evaluation was performed by the determination of cyto- toxic (MTT and hemolysis assay) and immunomodulatory (phagocytic capacity, lysosomal volume and nitrite

Serum catalase ( p < 0.05) levels signifi- cantly increased in the treatment group when compared to the control group.. There was no statistically significant difference between

(H) Idioblasts showing a positive reaction to ferric chloride Abbreviations: dr, druse; ec, exocarp; en, endocarp; ep, epithelium; id, idioblast; im, inner mesocarp; mm,

Endocarp with pectic cell content (arrow). Endocarp, in paradermal section. en: endocarp, ex: exocarp, hy: hypodermis, ie: inner epidermis, mc: mesocarp, me: mesophyll, oe: