w w w . r b o . o r g . b r
Original
article
Result
from
arthroscopic
surgical
treatment
of
renewed
tearing
of
the
rotator
cuff
of
the
shoulder
夽
Glaydson
Gomes
Godinho
a,b,c,
Flávio
de
Oliveira
Franc¸a
a,c,
José
Márcio
Alves
Freitas
a,b,
Flávio
Márcio
Lago
Santos
c,
Alexandre
Prandini
a,b,c,
André
Couto
Godinho
a,b,c,
Rafael
Patrocínio
de
Paula
Costa
a,b,c,∗aOrthopedicHospital,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil
bBeloHorizonteHospital,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil
cLifecenterHospital,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received31December2013 Accepted13March2014
Availableonline23February2015
Keywords: Rotatorcuff Treatmentfailure Arthroscopy
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Objectives: Toevaluatefunctionamongpatientswithpostoperativerecurrenceofrotator cuffinjuriesthatwastreatedarthroscopically(caseseries)andcomparethiswithfunction inpatientswithoutrecurrence(controlgroup);andtocomparefunctionamongpatients withrecurrenceofrotatorcuffinjuriesthatweregreaterthanandsmallerthan3cm. Methods:Thiswasaretrospectiveevaluationofpatientswhounderwentarthroscopic revi-sionofrotatorcuffinjuriesusingtheASES,Constant&MurleyandUCLAscoresandavisual analogpainscale,incomparisonwithpatientsinacontrolgroupwhounderwentprimary rotatorcuffrepair.
Results:Thesizeoftherotatorcuffinjuryrecurrencehadastatisticallysignificantinfluence ontheresultfromthearthroscopicsurgicaltreatment.Thefunctionalscoresshowedworse resultsthanthosefromthefirstprocedure.
Conclusion: Arthroscopic surgical treatment of renewed tearing of rotator cuff injuries showedworsefunctionalscoresthanthosefromprimaryrepairoftheinjury.
©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora Ltda.Allrightsreserved.
Resultado
do
tratamento
cirúrgico
artroscópico
das
rerrupturas
do
manguito
rotador
do
ombro
Palavras-chave: Bainharotadora Falhadetratamento Artroscopia
r
e
s
u
m
o
Objetivos:Avaliara func¸ãode pacientesoperados por via artroscópicade recidiva pós-cirúrgicadelesãodomanguitorotador(sériedecasos)ecompará-loscomaquelessem recidiva(grupocontrole).Compararafunc¸ãodepacientescomrecidivadelesõesdo man-guitorotador(MR)maioresemenoresdoque3cm.
夽
WorkdevelopedatLifecenterHospital,BeloHorizonteHospitalandOrthopedicHospital,BeloHorizonte,MG,Brazil. ∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:Rtrauma@gmail.com(R.P.d.P.Costa). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2015.02.007
Métodos: Avaliac¸ãoretrospectivadepacientessubmetidosarevisãoartroscópicadaslesões domanguitorotadorcomousodosescoresdeASES,ConstanteMurley,UCLAeescala analógicade dor e comparac¸ãocompacientes dogrupocontrole submetidos areparo primáriodoMR.
Resultados: Otamanhodalesão domanguitorotadornarecidivaapresentouinfluência noresultadodotratamentocirúrgicoartroscópicocomsignificânciaestatística.Osescores funcionaismostrarampioresresultadosquandocomparadosàquelesdoprimeiro procedi-mento.
Conclusão: Otratamentocirúrgicoartroscópicodasrerrupturasdelesõesdomanguito rota-dormostroupioresescoresfuncionaisquandocomparadoaoreparoprimáriodalesão.
©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevier EditoraLtda.Todososdireitosreservados.
Introduction
Surgical treatment of recurrence ofrotator cuff injuries is achallengebecauseofthediagnosticdifficultiesand surgi-caltechnique, and becauseit evolves withresultsthat are inferior tothose ofprimary surgery.1 The approach needs
to be carefuland surgical treatment may not bethe only
option. The evolution of the lesions is unpredictable2 and
theremay bediscordancebetweenthe clinical assessment
andtheimagingexaminations.3Persistenceofpainandloss of function after conservative treatment may indicate the needforsurgicaltreatment.Moststudieshaveevaluatedthe resultsfromsurgicalrepairsperformedasopenrevision
pro-cedures. Arthroscopic repair presents advantages, such as
loweraggressioninrelationtothedeltoidmuscle,the possi-bilityofdiagnosingassociatedlesionsandbetterviewingand classificationofthesizeoftheinjury.4
Recurrencesofrotatorcuffinjuriesare acommon com-plication.Theincidenceofrecurrenceshasbeenestimatedas 35%forsmallinjuries5,6andmayreachmorethan94%incases ofextensiveinjuries.7,8 Theetiologyofrecurrencesvaries.1 Despitetheadvancesintreatmentthathavebeenachieved, thereareno preciseparameters fordiagnosingrecurrences oftheseinjuries.9Inthis regard,physicalexaminationand imagingmethodsareofgreatimportance,inthattheyprovide additionaldatathatmightguidethediagnosis.
Theinitial radiographic evaluationmakes it possible to estimatetheupwardmigrationofthehumeralhead,presence ofsubacromialspurs,glenohumeralosteoarthritisandanchor positions.Additionalinformationmay beobtainedthrough othermethods,suchasultrasonography(US),magnetic
res-onance imaging (MRI) and arthro-computed tomography
(arthro-CT).10 These examinations are indicated when the postoperativerecoveryevolvesinanunsatisfactorymanner.11 MRIisconsideredtobethemostsuitablenoninvasiveimaging examination.
Thecharacteristicsofthesupraspinatustendonafterthe operationcanbeassessedusingMRIintofivetypes, accord-ingtotheclassificationsystemproposedbySugayaet al.12
Thisexaminationmakesit possibleto evaluatethe degree
offatty infiltrationofthe muscle bymeans ofthe classifi-cationsystemofGoutallieretal.13andthedegreeofmuscle trophismbymeansofthetangentsignproposedbyZanetti etal.14Allofthesefactorshaveprognosticvalueanddirectly
influencepatientmanagementandtheresultsfromthe sur-gicaltreatment.3
Theobjectivesofthepresentstudywereasfollows:
1. Toevaluatefunctionamongpatientswhounderwent oper-ationsduetorecurrenceofrotatorcuffinjuries(caseseries) andcomparethemwithpatientswithoutrecurrences (con-trolgroup).
2. To compare function among patients with rotator cuff
injurieslargerandsmallerthan3cm.
Materials
and
methods
Patientswhounderwentarthroscopicrevisionofrotatorcuff injuriesattheLifecenter,BeloHorizonteandOrthopedic hos-pitalsin BeloHorizonte, MG,performed bythe fourtitular
surgeonsofthegroupbetweenJanuary2003andNovember
2012,wereretrospectivelyevaluated.
Withtheaimofhavingabetterstatisticalevaluationofthe results,twocomparativegroupswereusedinthisstudy:the casegroup,whichconsistedofpatientswithrenewedtearing whowerereoperatedarthroscopically;andthecontrolgroup, formedbypatientswhohadbeenoperatedonlyoncefor rota-torcuffrepair.
Casegroup
This group comprised 57 patients and 58 shoulders (one
patient affected bilaterally) and underwent reoperation to treat recurrences ofrotator cuff injuries. Fifteenshoulders (26.3%)hadtraumaticetiologyand45,non-traumatic.
Duringthesurgicalprocedure,thelesionsweremeasured intheanteroposteriordirectionandwere groupedaslarger thanorsmallerthan3cm.Thirty-eightshoulders(66.6%) pre-sentedlesionslargerthan3cmand20(35.4%),smaller.Among thelesionsoftraumaticorigin,sevenwerelargerthan3cm andeightweresmaller.
Fifty-three shoulders (91.4%) required only onerevision procedureandfive(8.7%),morethanonerevision.
The patients’ mean age was 63.6 years (range: 42–92).
Thirty-one patients(53.4%) were male and26 (46.6%) were
female. Forty-seven shoulders(82.5%) wereaffected on the
right side and 11 (17.5%) on the left side. The dominant
Table1–Comparisonofdemographicdatabetweenthe casesseriesandthecontrols.
Cases Controls
Meanage(years) 63.6 62.2
Male 31 14
Female 26 25
Dominance 55 39
Sideaffected(RS/LS) 47/1130 /9
Smoking 1 6
SAH 22 15
DM 8 6
Hypothyroidism 1 4
Dyslipidemia 12 5
SAH,systemicarterial hypertension;DM,diabetesmellitus; RS, rightshoulder;LS,leftshoulder.
ambidextrousandonepresentedbilateralrecurrenceof rota-torcuffinjuries.
Amongthecommonestcomorbidities,22patients(38.6%)
presentedsystemicarterialhypertension(SAH),seven(12.3%) hypothyroidism,eight(14%)diabetesand12(21%) dyslipide-mia.
Thescalesusedforevaluatingthepatientswerethevisual analogscale(VAS)forpain,AmericanShoulderandElbow Sur-geons(ASES)scale,15UCLAshoulderratingscale(UCLA)16and ConstantandMurleyscale.17
Controlgroup
Thiswasagroupof39patients(42shoulders)whounderwent arthroscopicrepairofrotatorcuffinjuriesonasingleoccasion,
performedbythesamesurgeonsbetweenMay1996andJuly
2008.
Twelveshoulders(28%)presentedlesionslargerthan3cm and30(72%),smaller.
Alloftheseshoulderswereoperatedonlyonce.
Themeanageamongthesepatientswas62.2years(range: 45–76).Elevenpatients(28.2%)weremaleand28(71.8%)were female.Therightsidewas affectedin32 shoulders(76.2%) andtheleftsideinten(23.8%).Thedominantsidepresented lesionsin 11patients (28.2%).None ofthesepatients were ambidextrous.Fifteenpatients(38.5%)werehypertensive,six (15.4%)werediabetic,four(10.3%)presentedhypothyroidism andfive(12.8%)haddyslipidemia(Table1).
Thefunctionalevaluationonthepatientsinthisgroupwas performedusingtheConstantandMurleyscore.
Statistical
analysis
TheMann–Whitneytestwasusedtoevaluatethefunctional scoresintheseriesofcontrolsandcasesandthesizesofthe lesionsweretakenintoconsideration.
ThestatisticalanalysiswasperformedusingtheStatistical PackagefortheSocialSciences(SPSS)software,version17.0. Thesignificancelevelwastakentobep<0.05.
Results
Comparisonofthefunctionalresultsbetweenthetwosizes oflesionsstudiedshowedastatisticallysignificantdifference. Patientswithlesionslargerthan3cmpresentedworse func-tionthanthosewithsmallerlesions.FromtheVASscoresfor pain,thesetwogroupsdidnotpresentanystatistical differ-ence(Table2).
In comparatively evaluating the Constant and Murley
scoresbetweenthecontrolandcasegroups,itwasobserved thatthepatientswhounderwentonlyonerotatorcuffrepair procedurehadstatisticallybetterfunctionalresults(Table3).
Discussion
Persistence of symptoms such as pain, loss of strength
and limitation of movements after a rotator cuff injury
has been repairedis a sign indicating aprobable needfor surgical revision,1 whenassociatedwithimaging examina-tions demonstratingthepresenceofanewlesion.Itneeds to be taken into consideration that there is a possibility
of discordance between clinical assessments and imaging
examinations.3Jostetal.2evaluated20patientswithimaging diagnosesofrecurrenceofrotatorcuffinjuriesandobserved thatfourofthemwerecompletelyasymptomatic.Makingthis diagnosisusingphysicalexaminationalonewasimpossible.
Certain factors need to be taken into consideration in
order to distinguish which patients might benefit from a
newsurgicalprocedure.AccordingtoMontgomeryetal.,3the best candidates are relatively young, with high functional demands,and presentreparablelesionswithout significant muscleatrophy,withagoodrangeofmotion,anintactdeltoid
Table2–Functionalandpainevaluationinrelationtothetwogroupsoflesionsize.
Variables Lesions n Median 95%CIfordifferencebetweengroups p-value
VAS <3cm 38 2.0 [1.0]−0.0to3.0 0.2
>3cm 20 3.0
TotalASES <3cm 38 80.8 [1.0]−26.7to−0.0 0.05
>3cm 20 65.8
UCLA <3cm 38 28.50 [1.0]−8.0to−2.0 0.004
>3cm 20 23.50
Constant <3cm 38 79.95 [1.0]−18.2to−5.6 <0.001
>3cm 20 69.00
Table3–FunctionalevaluationofthecasesseriesversuscontrolgroupbymeansoftheConstantscore.
Variables Group N Median 95%CIfordifferencebetweengroup p-value
Constant Controls 41 81.8 [1.0]2.2–11.6 0.006
Cases 58 74.8
Thesignificanceprobabilities(p-values)refertotheMann–Whitneytest.
muscleand onlyone previousoperation. Ifthere isa con-traindicationagainstsurgery,conservativetreatmentmaybe indicated,andthishasbeencorrelatedwithgoodresults.1
Some studies have evaluated the results from surgical
treatmentofrecurrencesofrotatorcuffinjuriesasopen pro-cedures. In 1984, DeOrio and Cofield18 published the first caseseries,evaluatingtheresultsfrom24patientswhowere reoperated.Amongthese,onlyfourpatientspresentedgood results.After46monthsoffollow-up,thepainlevelwas mod-erateorseverein63%.Biglianietal.19evaluated31patients withrecurrencesofrotatorcuffinjuriesandobtainedgood orexcellentresultsin52%ofthecases.Therewere
improve-ments of pain in 81% of the patients by the end of the
follow-up.Poorresultswereattributedtodeinsertionofthe deltoidmuscle,lateralacromionectomyandpoortissue qual-ity.Ontheotherhand,Djurasovicetal.20evaluatedthelargest seriesofreoperationsdescribedintheliterature(80patients)
and found that58% ofthe resultswere good or excellent.
Inthatstudy,86%ofthepatientsevolvedwithimprovement oftheirpain.Similarly,NeviaserandNeviaser21evaluated50 patientswhounderwentsurgicalrevisionoftherotatorcuff andreportedthattherewereimprovementsinpainin92%of thecases.Inanalyzingtheresultsfromthepresentstudy,we
observedthatthemeanpainlevelamongpatientswhohad
undergonesurgicaltreatmentofrecurrencesofrotator cuff injurieswas2.9points,measuredusingtheVAS.
CordascoandBigliani19,22believedthatthemainobjective inrevisionsurgeryoughttobepainrelief,ratherthan improve-mentoffunction.FromevaluatingfunctionusingtheConstant andMurleyscoreinthepresentstudy,itwasshownthat reop-eratedpatientshadworsefunctionalresultsthanthoseofthe controlgroup.
Few studies have evaluated the effects of arthroscopic repaironrecurrencesofrotatorcuffinjuries,despitethe bene-fitsofthetechnique.Inaretrospectiveanalysison30patients whowerereoperatedeitherasopenorasarthroscopic pro-cedures,Miyasaki et al.23 foundthat unsatisfactory results
predominatedamongpatientswhounderwent openrepair,
incomparisonwiththearthroscopicroute(p=0.001). Fromarthroscopicrevision,Loetal.24foundthat93%ofthe resultsweresatisfactory.Intheirevaluation,theUCLAscore increasedfrom 13.1±2.3before the operationto 28.6±7.1 aftertheoperation.Inaseriesof54patientswhowere reoper-atedarthroscopicallysoastoperformrevisionofrotatorcuff injuries,Piaseckietal.4foundthattheASESscoreincreased from43.8±5.7beforetheoperationto68.1±7.2afterthe
oper-ation,whiletherewasnoimprovementinpainasassessed
usingtheVAS.Keeneretal.25usedmethodologysimilartothat ofthepresentstudyandretrospectivelyevaluated21patients whounderwentarthroscopicrevisionsurgeryontherotator cuff,withameanfollow-upof33months.ThemeanConstant andMurleyscorewas60.7inthecasegroupand76.2inthe
controlgroup,withstatisticalsignificance.Thepresentstudy onlytookintoaccounttheresultsfromarthroscopicrepairof recurrencesofrotatorcuffinjuries,withasampleof58 reoper-atedshoulders.Thefunctionalresultsfromthecontrolgroup, asassessedusingtheConstantandMurleyscore(81.8)were superiortothosefromthecaseseries(74.8).
In aseriesofarthroscopic revisions, Ladermannetal.26
compared lesions that were larger than and smaller than
5cmanddidnotfindanyfunctionaldifferencesbetweenthe groups.Thepresentstudyshowedadifferenceinfunctional
results throughcomparing lesions larger than and smaller
than3cm.Thisdivergencefromthepreviousstudyisdueto the factthatinthe firststudy,the lesionsweregroupedas largeandextensive,whereasinthesecond,thegroupingwas assmallandlarge.
The retrospective nature of the present study can be
highlightedasalimitation.Thus,therewasnopreoperative functionalevaluation.
Conclusion
Patients with recurrence of rotator cuff injuries achieved worsefunctionalresultsfromarthroscopicsurgerythanthose ofpatientswithoutrecurrence.
Patients who presented recurrence of lesions of sizes
smaller than 3cm presented better function than that of
patientswithlargerlesions.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.KilincAS,GiarretiR,DiazL,SauzièresP,ValentiP.Recurrent rotatorcufftears:anevaluationofopenre-surgeryresults. EurJOrthopSurgTraumatol.2010;20(5):373–80.
2.JostB,PfirrmannCW,GerberC.Clinicaloutcomeafter structuralfailureofrotatorcuffrepairs.JBoneJointSurgAm. 2000;82(3):304–14.
3.MontgomerySR,PetriglianoFA,GamradtSC.Failedrotator cuffsurgery,evaluation,anddecisionmaking.ClinSports Med.2012;31(4):693–712.
4.PiaseckiDP,VermaNN,NhoSJ,BhatiaS,BoniquitN,ColeBJ, etal.Outcomesafterarthroscopicrevisionrotatorcuffrepair. Arthroscopicrevisionrotatorcuffrepairoutcomes.AmJ SportsMed.2010;38(1):40–6.
5.GaziellyDF,GleyzeP,MontagnonC.Functionaland
6. WulkerN,MelzerC,WirthCJ.Shouldersurgeryforrotator cufftears.Ultrasonographic3-yearfollow-upof97cases.Acta OrthopScand.1991;62(2):142–7.
7. CalvertPT,PackerNP,StokerDJ,BayleyJI,KesselL. Arthrographyoftheshoulderafteroperativerepairofthe tornrotatorcuff.JBoneJointSurgBr.1986;68(1):147–50. 8. GalatzLM,BallCM,TeefeySA,MiddletonWD,YamaguchiK.
Theoutcomeandrepairintegrityofcompletely
arthroscopicallyrepairedlargeandmassiverotatorcufftears. JBoneJointSurgAm.2004;86(2):219–24.
9. PotterHG,JawetzST,FooLF.Imagingoftherotatorcuff followingrepair:humanandanimalmodels.JShoulder ElbowSurg.2007;16(5Suppl):S134–9.
10.WilliamsG.Painfulshoulderaftersurgeryforrotatorcuff disease.JAmAcadOrthopSurg.1997;5(2):97–108. 11.GeorgeMS,KhazzamM.Revisionrotatorcuffrepair.J
ShoulderElbowSurg.2012;21(4):431–40.
12.SugayaH,MaedaK,MatsukiK,MoriishiJ.Functionaland structuraloutcomeafterarthroscopicfull-thicknessrotator cuffrepair:single-rowversusdual-rowfixation.Arthroscopy. 2005;21(11):1307–16.
13.GoutallierD,PostelJM,BernageauJ,LavauL,VoisinMC.Fatty muscledegenerationincuffruptures.Pre-andpostoperative evaluationbyCTscan.ClinOrthopRelatRes.1994;(304):78–83. 14.ZanettiM,GerberC,HodlerJ.Quantitativeassessmentofthe
musclesoftherotatorcuffwithmagneticresonanceimaging. InvestRadiol.1998;33(3):163–70.
15.MichenerLA,McClurePW,SennettBJ.AmericanShoulderand ElbowSurgeonsStandardizedShoulderAssessmentForm, patientself-reportsection:reliability,validity,and responsiveness.JShoulderElbowSurg.2002;11(6): 587–94.
16.EllmanH,HankerG,BayerM.Repairoftherotatorcuff. End-resultstudyoffactorsinfluencingreconstruction.JBone JointSurgAm.1986;68(8):1136–44.
17.ConstantCR,MurleyAH.Aclinicalmethodoffunctional assessmentoftheshoulder.ClinOrthopRelatRes. 1987;(214):160–4.
18.DeOrioJK,CofieldRH.Resultsofasecondattemptatsurgical repairofafailedinitialrotatorcuffrepair.JBoneJointSurg Am.1984;66(4):563–7.
19.BiglianiLU,CordascoFA,McIlveenSJ,MussoES.Operative treatmentoffailedrepairsoftherotatorcuff.JBoneJoint SurgAm.1992;74(10):1505–15.
20.DjurasovicM,MarraG,ArroyoJS,PollockRG,FlatowEL, BiglianiLU.Revisionrotatorcuffrepair:factorsinfluencing results.JBoneJointSurgAm.2001;83(12):1849–55. 21.NeviaserRJ,NeviaserTJ.Reoperationforfailedrotatorcuff
repair:analysisoffiftycases.JShoulderElbowSurg. 1992;1(6):283–6.
22.CordascoFA,BiglianiLU.Thetreatmentoffailedrotatorcuff repairs.InstrCourseLect.1998;47:77–86.
23.MiyazakiAN,FregonezeM,SantosPD,SilvaLA,SellaGV, SantosRMM,etal.Avaliac¸ãodosresultadosdasreoperac¸ões depacientescomlesõesdomanguitorotador.RevBrasOrtop. 2011;46(1):45–50.
24.LoIK,BurkhartSS.Arthroscopicrevisionoffailedrotatorcuff repairs:techniqueandresults.Arthroscopy.2004;20(3):250–67. 25.KeenerJD,WeiAS,KimHM,PaxtonES,TeefeySA,GalatzLM,
etal.Revisionarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair:repairintegrity andclinicaloutcome.JBoneJointSurgAm.2010;92(3):590–8. 26.LadermannA,DenardPJ,BurkhartSS.Mid-termoutcomeof