• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. ortop. vol.50 número1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. ortop. vol.50 número1"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texto

(1)

w w w . r b o . o r g . b r

Original

article

Comparative

analysis

on

arthroscopic

sutures

of

large

and

extensive

rotator

cuff

injuries

in

relation

to

the

degree

of

osteopenia

Alexandre

Almeida

a,∗

,

Vinícius

Atti

b

,

Daniel

Cecconi

Agostini

a

,

Márcio

Rangel

Valin

a

,

Nayvaldo

Couto

de

Almeida

a

,

Ana

Paula

Agostini

c

aHospitalSaúde,CaxiasdoSul,RS,Brazil bHospitalPompeia,CaxiasdoSul,RS,Brazil

cPontificalCatholicUniversityofRioGrandedoSul,CaxiasdoSul,RS,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received28December2013

Accepted10February2014

Availableonline24January2015

Keywords:

Bonedensity

Osteoporosis

Rotatorcuff

Shoulder

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Objective:Toanalyzetheresultsfromarthroscopicsuturingoflargeandextensiverotator

cuffinjuries,accordingtothepatient’sdegreeofosteopenia.

Method:138patientswhounderwentarthroscopicsuturingoflargeandextensiverotator

cuff injuriesbetween2003and2011wereanalyzed.Those operatedfromOctober2008

onwardsformedaprospectivecohort,whiletheremainderformedaretrospectivecohort.

AlsofromOctober2008onwards,bonedensitometryevaluationwasrequestedatthetime

ofthesurgicaltreatment.Forthepatientsoperatedbeforethisdate,densitometry

examina-tionsperformeduptotwoyearsbeforeorafterthesurgicaltreatmentwereinvestigated.The

patientsweredividedintothreegroups.Thosewithosteoporosisformedgroup1(n=16);

thosewithosteopenia,group2(n=33);andnormalindividuals,group3(n=55).

Results:InanalyzingtheUniversityofCaliforniaatLosAngeles(UCLA)scoresofgroup3

andcomparingthemwithgroup2,nostatisticallysignificantdifferencewasseen(p=0.070).

Analysisongroup3incomparisonwithgroup1showedastatisticallysignificantdifference

(p=0.027).

Conclusion: Theresultsfromarthroscopicsuturingoflargeandextensiverotatorcuffinjuries

seemtobeinfluencedbythepatient’sbonemineraldensity,asassessedusingbone

densit-ometry.

©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora

Ltda.Allrightsreserved.

WorkdevelopedatHospitalSaúdeandintheOrthopedicsResidencyServiceofHospitalPompeia,CaxiasdoSul,RS,Brazil.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:bone@visao.com.br(A.Almeida).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2015.01.004

(2)

Análise

comparativa

da

sutura

artroscópica

de

lesões

grandes

e

extensas

do

manguito

rotador

com

relac¸ão

ao

grau

de

osteopenia

Palavras-chave:

Densidadeóssea

Osteoporose

Bainharotadora

Ombro

r

e

s

u

m

o

Objetivo: analisar oresultadodasutura artroscópicadaslesõesgrandese extensasdo

manguitorotador(MR)deacordocomograudeosteopeniadopaciente.

Método: coorteprospectivanospacientesoperadosapartirdeoutubrode2008e

retrospec-tivanosdemais.Foramanalisados138pacientessubmetidosàsuturaartroscópicadelesões

grandeseextensasdoMRentre2003e2011.Aospacientesoperadosapartirdeoutubrode

2008erasolicitadaumadensitometriaóssea(DO)porocasiãodotratamentocirúrgico.Nos

pacientesoperadosantesdeoutubrode2008,pesquisaram-sedensitometriasfeitasdois

anosantesouapósotratamentocirúrgico.Ospacientesforamdivididosemtrêsgrupos.Os

comosteoporoseformaramogrupo1(n=16),oscomosteopeniao2(n=33)eosnormaiso

3(n=55).

Resultados: aoanalisaroescoredaUniversidadedaCalifórniaemLosAngeles(UCLA)do

Grupo3ecompará-locomoGrupo2,nãofoiverificadaumadiferenc¸aestatisticamente

significativa(p=0,070).AoanalisaroGrupo3ecompará-locomoGrupo1,foiverificada

umadiferenc¸aestatisticamentesignificativa(p=0,027).

Conclusão: oresultadodasuturaartroscópicadaslesõesgrandeseextensasdoMRparece

sofrerinfluênciadadensidademineralósseadopacienteavaliadapormeiodeDO.

©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevier

EditoraLtda.Todososdireitosreservados.

Introduction

Development and dissemination of arthroscopic

sutur-ing techniques for the rotator cuff have made shoulder

arthroscopyoneofthemostfrequentlyperformedprocedures

inorthopedic surgical centers.1,2 The great challenge is to

identifyriskfactorsthatmightinterferewiththe

postopera-tiveevolutionofeachpatient,especiallyintheviewoflarge

andextensivenatureofrotatorcuffinjuries.Identificationof

theseriskfactorshassofarbeensubjectiveanddependenton

professionalexperience.

Someriskfactorshavealreadybeendescribedinthe

liter-ature.Thepatient’sageatthetimeofthesurgicalprocedure

seemstohaveaninfluenceonhealingandongainsrelatingto

rangeofmotionandmusclestrength.3,4Othervariablessuch

assex,5smoking,6–10tendonqualityshownonmagnetic

reso-nanceimaging,11humerus-acromiondistance<7mmshown

onX-rays12 andimpairment ofthelong headofthebiceps

havebeenconsideredtobedeleteriousforthefinalresultfrom

thetreatment.13–17

Somedataregardingbonemasslosses fromthe greater

tubercle induced by rotator cuff injuries have been

pub-lished in the literature.18–20 These data, along with some

mechanicalstudies,suggestthatosteopeniamayhavea

dele-terious effect on the postoperative healing of the rotator

cuff.11,21,22 We were unable to find any data analyses on

the relationship between the bone loss inherent to aging

and the results from arthroscopic suturing of the rotator

cuff.

Theaimofthepresentstudywastocomparatively

ana-lyze the results from arthroscopic suturing of rotator cuff

injuries,accordingtothepatient’sdegreeofosteopenia

mea-suredthroughbonedensitometry.

Methods

Thiswasaprospectivecohortstudyonpatientsoperatedfrom

October2008onwardsandaretrospectivecohortstudyonthe

remainder.

Atotalof138patientswhounderwentarthroscopic

sutur-ing of large and extensive rotator cuff injuries23 between

January21,2003,andFebruary4,2011,wereassessed.

Aftergeneralanesthesiahadbeeninduced,thepatientwas

positionedinlateraldecubituswiththeupperlimbabducted

at30◦,flexedat20andundertractionof5kg.Thejoint

dis-tension techniquecompriseduseofphysiologicalserumin

suspensionforthepatientsoperateduptoJanuary2006and

use of a joint distension pumpfrom this dateonwards.24

Arthroscopic suturingofthe rotatorcuffinjury wasalways

performedbythesamesurgeon.

Allthepatientswereimmobilizedwhilestillanesthetized,

inthesurgicaltheater,usingaslingtogetherwithan

abduc-tionpad.

For the purposesof analyzing the degreeof osteopenia

amongthe patients who were operatedfrom October2008

onwards, bonedensitometrywas requested as a

preopera-tiveexamination.ThepatientsoperatedbeforeOctober2008

were askedabout anydensitometryexaminationsthat had

beenperformeduptotwoyearsbeforeorafterthesurgical

treatmentontheshoulder.

Allpatientswhounderwentcompletearthroscopicclosure

oftherotatorcuffinjuryandwhoseoperationswerenotmore

than12monthsbeforetheassessmentdatawereevaluated.

All ofthesepatientshadabonedensitometryexamination

that wasconsidered tobevalid, whichwas performednot

morethantwoyearsbeforeorafterthedateofthesurgical

(3)

Table1–Groupsaccordingtothedegreeofosteoporosis.

n Densitometry Diagnosis

Group1 16 −3.90to−2.50 Osteoporosis Group2 33 −2.49to−1.01 Osteopenia Group3 55 −1.00to4.00 Normal

All patientsunder the age of40 years,those who were smokers,thosewhoserotatorcuffinjuryclosurewaspartial andthosewhounderwentrevisionsurgerywereexcluded.

For the purposesof the statistical analysis, the lumbar and femoral T values from bone densitometry were used. Patientswereconsideredtopresentosteopeniaiftheywere intherangeof−2.49to−1.01inoneorbothmeasurements. Theywere considered to presentosteoporosis if theywere below−2.49andwereconsiderednormaliftheywereabove −1.01.25–28Thepatientsweredividedintothreegroups

accord-ing to their densitometryvalues and degree ofosteopenia

(Table 1). These with osteoporosisformed Group 1(n=16);

thosewithosteopenia,group2(n=33);andnormal

individ-uals,group3(n=55).

TheresultswereevaluatedbymeansoftheUCLAscale.29,30

Thevariablesstudiedweresex,age,degreeofosteopenia,

UCLAindexandmusclestrength.

ThedatawereanalyzedusingtheSPSSsoftware(Statistical

PackagefortheSocialSciences),version19.0(SPSSInc.,2011).

Forthestatisticalanalysis,calculationsofmedians,

interquar-tileintervals,frequenciesandpercentageswereused.Tomake

comparisons,theMann–WhitneyUtestandchi-squaretest

wereused.Differenceswithp<0.05fora95%confidence

inter-valwereconsideredsignificant.

Results

Thisstudy evaluated138 shoulders that were operated, of

which34wereexcluded.Thus,thestudysamplecomprised

104.

Themedianlengthofthepostoperativeevaluationwas30

months(minimumof12andmaximumof97).Themeanage

was60.7±8.3years.Inrelationtosex,35patients(33.6%)were

maleand69(66.4%)werefemale.

Thegroups were analyzedregarding the proportions of

maleandfemalepatients(Table2).Thethreegroupswere

con-sideredtobesimilar,althoughfemalepatientspredominated

ingroup2(p=0.009).

Table2–Sexinrelationtoosteoporosis.

Diagnosis n Gendern(%) pa

Male Female

Group1 Osteoporosis 16 4(25.0) 12(75.0) 0.233 Group2 Osteopenia 33 7(21.2) 26(78.8) 0.009

Group3 Normal 55 26(47.3) 29(52.7) 0.680

a Chi-squarewithYatescorrection.

Group

Normal Osteopenia

Osteoporosis

Age

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

31

Male

Fig.1–Agesofthemalepatients.

Thegroupswereanalyzedregardingagegroupaccording

tothepatients’sex(Table3).Thegroupswereconsideredto

besimilar(Figs.1and2).

InanalyzingtheUCLAscoreofgroup3(55patients;52.8%)

andcomparingthiswiththescoreofgroup2(33;31.7%),no

statisticallysignificantdifferenceintheresultswasobserved

(p=0.070)(Table4).

InanalyzingtheUCLAscoreofgroup3(55patients;52.8%)

and comparingthiswiththescoreofgroup1(16;15.5%),a

statisticallysignificantdifferenceintheresultswasobserved

(p=0.027)(Table5).

InanalyzingtheUCLAscoreofgroup3andcomparingthis

withthescoresofgroups2and1,nostatisticallysignificant

differenceintheresultswasobserved(p=0.746)(Table6).

Thecolumnofvaluesrelatingtothestrengthofanterior

flexionontheUCLAscaleingroups3and1wasanalyzed

sep-arately.Patientswithvaluesof4and5wereconsideredtohave

Table3–Agegroupinrelationtoosteoporosis.

Diagnosis n Medianage(years)(IIQa) pb

Male Female

Group1 Osteoporosis 16 57.0(53.5–60.5) 64.5(56–70) 0.129

Group2 Osteopenia 33 58.0(55.5–64.5) 59.5(55–68) 0.708

Group3 Normal 55 58.0(53–65) 53.0(53–65) 0.846

a IIQ,interquartilerange.

(4)

Group

Normal Osteopenia

Osteoporosis

Age

80

70

60

50

40

Female

Fig.2–Agesofthefemalepatients.

Table4–Comparisonbetweennormalandosteopenic

groups.

UCLA Normaln=55 Osteopenicn=33 pa

Median(IIQb) 30(27–32) 32(29–34) 0.070

Minimum 9 16

Maximum 35 35

a Mann–WhitneyUtest.

b IIQ,interquartilerangeoramplitude.

Table5–Comparisonbetweennormalandosteoporotic

groups.

UCLA Normaln=55 Osteoporoticn=16 pa

Median(IIQb) 30(27–32) 27(21.5–29) 0.027

Minimum 9 12

Maximum 35 35

a Mann–WhitneyUtest.

b IIQ,interquartilerangeoramplitude.

recoveredtheirstrength,whereasthosewithvaluesfrom0to

3were consideredtopresent alteredstrength(i.e.theyhad

notrecovered).Comparisonofthestrength valuesbetween

thegroupsusingtheUCLAscaledidnotshowanystatistically

significantdifferenceintheresults(p=0.165)(Table7).

Table6–Comparisonbetweennormalgroupand

osteopenicandosteoporoticgroupstogether.

UCLA Normaln=55 Group1+group2n=49 pa

Median(IIQb) 30(27–32) 30(27–32) 0.746

Minimum 9 12

Maximum 35 35

a Mann–WhitneyUtest.

b IIQ,interquartilerangeoramplitude.

Table7–Analysisonmusclestrength.

Densitometry Strengthn(%) pa

Altered Normal

Osteoporosis 11(68.8) 5(31.2) 0.165

Normal 27(49.1) 28(50.9)

a Chi-squarewithYatescorrection.

Discussion

Surgical treatment ofrotator cuffinjuriespresents varying

results that depend on the type and size of the injuries

sutured. Injuries classified as large and extensive

accord-ing toCofield23are theonesthatpresenttheworstresults,

with the greatest numbers of cases offailure to heal and

reopening.17,31–33Thesearethereforetheinjuriesthatmost

evidently demonstrate the influence of factors for worse

prognoses.17

Theagesofthepatientsoperatedhasalreadybeenstudied

byseveralauthors asanimportantprognosticfactor,

espe-ciallyforindividualsovertheageof65years.3,4,34 Thus,we

chosetoexcludepatientsundertheageof40years,among

whom nobasisforstudyingosteoporosiswould exist.25We

tookcaretoevaluatethepatients’agesinthethreegroupsso

thatthesamplewouldbeashomogenousaspossible.

Withregardtosexasapredictivefactorfortheresult,ithas

beenfoundthatwomen’sexpectationsandconcernsinterfere

moresignificantlywiththepostoperativerecovery.6We

evalu-atedthegroupsinrelationtothenumbersofmenandwomen.

Eventhoughwomenpredominatedingroup2,allthegroups

wereconsideredtobesimilarfromastatisticalpointofview.

There is controversy in the literature with regard to

whethersmokingisafactorgivingapoorprognosisforthe

resultsfromsurgicaltreatmentoftherotatorcuff.

Boisson-naultetal.35didnotdemonstrateanynegativeimpactfrom

smokingonthepostoperativeresultsfromrotatorcuff

sutur-ing. However,most authors haveshown that smoking has

adeleteriouseffectonthesepatients’microvascularization,

healingandfinalclinicalresults.7–10,36,37 Inaccordancewith

thetrendamongthemajorityofarticlesintheliterature,we

excludedsmokers.

Charousset etal.11 and Miyazaki etal.16 studiedtendon

quality at the time of tendon suturing and observed that

injuriesthatweresutured earlyon,i.e.beforemuscle

atro-phyandfattydegenerationhadbecomeestablished,evolved

withbetterclinicalresults.Inourstudy,wedidnotinclude

the parameter ofthe timeinterval between theinjury and

thesuturingbecauseofdifficultyinobtainingthisinformation

anditsimprecision.

Thebonelossinherenttoaginghasbeenrecognizedas

givingrisetohigherincidenceoffracturesinthethirdage.38

Ontheotherhand,osteoporosisdoesnotseemtodelay

frac-turehealing,providedthatthefractureshavebeenadequately

stabilized.39

Inshouldersthathavebeenaffectedbyrotatorcuffinjuries,

thereisadecreaseinbonemasscenteredontheregionofthe

greatertubercle,duetolossofthestimulusoftendontraction.

(5)

rotatorcufffunctionthroughconservativetreatmentpresent

lesslocalizedboneloss.19

Galatzetal.20demonstratedthattherewasadeterioration

intissuehealingpropertiesinthegroupofpatientsforwhom

tendoninjuryrepairwaslate,whichcoincidedwithbonemass

lossinthegreater tubercle.These results,whichwere also

seenbyCharoussetetal.,11indicatethatbonemasslossin

thegreatertuberclemaybeanimportantfactorleadingtopoor

healing.11,20

Mechanical studies on cadavers and studies on animal

models have demonstrated a relationship between loss of

bonemineraldensityandfailureoftendonsutures.21,22Brown

etal.21 demonstratedthat lowbonemineraldensityinthe

greatertuberclesofcadaversthatunderwentoperationswasa

significantfactorfavoringreopeningafterarthroscopic

sutur-ingoftherotatorcuff.Cadetetal.22demonstratedthatwhen

thebonedensityintheregionoftherotatorcuffinsertionof

ratsthatreceivedbisphosphonateswasimproved,thetime

takenforthetendonsuturetofailthrough stresswas

pro-longed.

Evaluationofbonemineraldensitydirectlyintheproximal

humerusrequiresspecialsoftwarethatisnotavailableinmost

bonedensitometryservices inour setting.Densitometry is

anexaminationperformedtoevaluatepatients’bonemineral

densityand,throughwell-definedcriteria, helpsin

manag-ingpreventionandtreatmentforosteoporosis.28Toenableour

study,weusedevaluationsonlumbarandfemoralT

measure-ments,whichindirectlyassesspatients’bonemineraldensity.

From these results, the patients were stratified into three

groups:normal,osteopenicandosteoporotic.Thestatistical

analysisshowedthatthepatientsinthegroupwith

densit-ometricvalueswithintherangeforosteoporosispresented

worseclinicalresultsontheUCLAscalethandidthosewith

densitometricvalueswiththerangeofnormality(p=0.027).

Thiswasthe mainoutcome from ourstudy,giventhat we

didnotfindanyotherstudiesintheliteraturethathad

cor-relatedthe resultsfrom arthroscopic suturing oflargeand

extensiverotatorcuffinjurieswiththepatients’bonemineral

density.

Boileau et al.3 found that healingoccurred in only43%

of the patients over the age of 65 years who were

oper-ated.Similarresultswere foundbyFavardetal.34 Godinho

etal.4observedthatthegainsinmusclestrengthweremore

inconsistentamongpatientsovertheageof60years,which

suggests that tissue healingatthe tendon suture was not

takingplace.Thereisadirectrelationshipbetweenrecovery

ofmuscle strengthand healingofthesutureafterthe

sur-gicalprocedure.20 However,wewere unabletodemonstrate

this relationshipina statisticallysignificantmannerwhen

wecomparedtheitemthatevaluatedmusclestrengthonthe

UCLAscaleofthegroupswithnormalandosteoporotic

den-sitometricvalues(p=0.165).

Wecanstatethatthesourcesofbiasinourstudyconsisted

ofthefactthathigh-resistancethreadonlystartedtobeused

inoursamplein2006andthatweusedanindirect

measure-menttoevaluatethepatients’bonemineraldensity,bymeans

oflumbarandfemoralbonedensitometry.Itispossiblethat

directassessmentofbonemassintheproximalhumerusor

useofquantitativetomography(osteoabsorptiometry)would

havereacheddifferentresults.

Conclusion

Theresultsfromarthroscopicsuturingoflargeandextensive

rotator cuffinjuriesseem tobeinfluencedbythe patients’

bonemineraldensity,asassessedbymeansofthebone

den-sitometry technique available inour setting. Patients with

osteoporosispresentworseclinicalresults,asassessedusing

theUCLAscale.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1.BurkhartSS,LoIK.Arthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair.JAmAcad

OrthopSurg.2006;14(6):333–46.

2.FinnanRP,CrosbyLA.Partial-thicknessrotatorcufftears.J

ShoulderElbowSurg.2010;19(4):609–16.

3.BoileauP,BrassartN,WatkinsonDJ,CarlesM,HatzidakisAM,

KrishnanSG.Arthroscopicrepairoffull-thicknesstearsofthe

supraspinatus:doesthetendonreallyheal?JBoneJointSurg

Am.2005;87(6):1229–40.

4.GodinhoGG,Franc¸aFO,FreitasJM,WatanabeFN,NobreLO,

NetoMA,etal.Avaliac¸ãodaintegridadeanatômicapor

examedeultrassomefuncionalpeloíndicedeConstant&

Murleydomanguitorotadorapósreparoartroscópico.Rev

BrasOrtop.2010;45(2):174–90.

5.OhJH,YoonJP,KimJY,KimSH.Effectofexpectationsand

concernsinrotatorcuffdisordersandcorrelationswith

preoperativepatientcharacteristics.JShoulderElbowSurg.

2012;21(6):715–21.

6.CarboneS,GuminaS,ArceriV,CampagnaV,FagnaniC,

PostacchiniF.Theimpactofpreoperativesmokinghabiton

rotatorcufftear:cigarettesmokinginfluencesrotatorcuff

tearsizes.JShoulderElbowSurg.2012;21(1):56–60.

7.GalatzLM,SilvaMJ,RothermichSY,ZaegelMA,HavliogluN,

ThomopoulosS.Nicotinedelaystendon-to-bonehealingina

ratshouldermodel.JBoneJointSurgAm.2006;88(9):

2027–34.

8.MallonWJ,MisamoreG,SneadDS,DentonP.Theimpactof

preoperativesmokinghabitsontheresultsofrotatorcuff

repair.JShoulderElbowSurg.2004;13(2):129–32.

9.AlmeidaA,ValinMR,ZampieriR,AlmeidaNC,RovedaG,

AgostiniAP.Análisecomparativadoresultadodasutura

artroscópicadalesãodomanguitorotadorempacientes

fumantesenãofumantes.RevBrasOrtop.2011;46(2):172–5.

10.NhoSJ,BrownBS,LymanS,RonaldS,AdlerRS,AltchekDW,

etal.Prospectiveanalysisofarthroscopicrotatorcuffrepair:

prognosticfactorsaffectingclinicalandultrasoundoutcome.

JShoulderElbowSurg.2009;8(1):13–20.

11.CharoussetC,DuranthonLD,GrimbergJ,BellaicheL.

Arthro-C-scananalysisofrotatorcufftearshealingafter

arthroscopicrepair:analysisofpredictivefactorsina

consecutiveseriesof167arthroscopicrepairs.RevChir

OrthopReparatriceApparMot.2006;92(3):223–33.

12.GreenA.Chronicmassiverotatorcufftears:evaluationand

treatment.JAmAcadOrthopSurg.2003;11(5):321–31.

13.BoileauP,BaquéF,ValerioL,AhrensP,ChuinardC,TrojaniC.

Isolatedarthroscopicbicepstenotomyortenodesisimproves

symptomsinpatientswithmassiveirreparablerotatorcuff

tears.JBoneJointSurgAm.2007;89(4):747–57.

14.MaynouC,MehdiN,CassagnaudX,AudebertS,MestdaghH.

(6)

thebicepsbrachiiinfullthicknesstearsoftherotatorcuff

withoutrepair:40cases.RevChirOrthopReparatriceAppar

Mot.2005;91(4):300–6.

15.LoIKY,BurkhartSS.Arthroscopicrepairofmassive,

contracted,immobilerotatorcufftearsusingsingleand

doubleintervalslides:techniqueandpreliminaryresults.

Arthroscopy.2004;20(1):22–33.

16.MiyazakiAN,FregonezeM,SantosPD,SilvaLA,SellaGV,

SantosRM,etal.Avaliac¸ãodosresultadosdoreparo

artroscópicodelesõesdomanguitorotadorempacientes

comaté50anosdeidade.RevBrasOrtop.2011;46(3):276–80.

17.MiyazakiAN,FregonezeM,SantosPD,daSilvaLA,SellaGV,

SantosRM,etal.Avaliac¸ãodosresultadosdasreoperac¸õesde

pacientescomlesõesdomanguitorotador.RevBrasOrtop.

2011;46(1):45–50.

18.WaldorffEI,LindnerJ,KijekTG,DownieBK,HughesRE,

CarpenterJE,etal.Bonedensityofthegreatertuberosityis

decreasedinrotatorcuffdiseasewithandwithout

full-thicknesstears.JShoulderElbowSurg.2011;20(6):904–8.

19.KannusP,LeppäläJ,LehtoM,SievänenH,HeinonenA,

JärvinenM.Arotatorcuffruptureproducespermanent

osteoporosisintheaffectedextremity,butnotinthosewith

whomshoulderfunctionhasreturnedtonormal.JBone

MinerRes.1995;10(8):1263–71.

20.GalatzLM,RothermichSY,ZaegelM,SilvaMJ,HavliogluN,

ThomopoulosS.Delayedrepairoftendontoboneinjuries

leadstodecreasedbiomechanicalpropertiesandboneloss.J

OrthopRes.2005;23(6):1441–7.

21.BrownBS,CooperAD,McIffTE,KeyVH,TobyEB.Initial

fixationandcyclicloadingstabilityofknotlesssutureanchors

forrotatorcuffrepair.JShoulderElbowSurg.2008;17(2):

313–8.

22.CadetER,VorysGC,RahmanR,ParkSH,GardnerTR,LeeFY,

etal.Improvingbonedensityattherotatorcufffootprint

increasessupraspinatustendonfailurestressinaratmodel.J

OrthopRes.2010;28(3):308–14.

23.CofieldRH.Tearsofrotatorcuff.InstrCourseLect.

1981;30:258–73.

24.AlmeidaA,AgostiniAP,ValinMR,MartinsJA,FerreiraR.

Artroscopiadoombrocominfusãodesorofisiológicoem

suspensãoEstamostrabalhandodeformasegura?RevBras

Ortop.2006;41(7):253–8.

25.NationalOsteoporosisFoundationClinician’sguideto

preventionandtreatmentofosteoporosis.Washington:

NationalOsteoporosisFoundation;2008.

26.WorldHealthOrganizationassessmentoffractureriskandits

applicationtoscreeningforpostmenopausalosteoporosis.

ReportofaWHOStudyGroup.WorldHealthOrganTechRep

Ser.1994;843:1–129.

27.Guidelinesforpreclinicalevaluationandclinicaltrialsin

osteoporosis.Geneva:WHO;1998.p.59.

28.IIReuniãodeDesenvolvimentodasPosic¸õesOficiaisda

SociedadeBrasileiradeDensitometriaÓssea.SãoPaulo:

SociedadeBrasileiradeDensitometriaÓssea;2008.

29.AmstutzHC,SewHoyAL,ClarkeIC.UCLAanatomictotal

shoulderarthroplasty.ClinOrthopRelatRes.1981;(155):7–20.

30.EllmanH,HankerG,BayerM.Repairoftherotatorcuff

end-resultstudyoffactorsinfluencingreconstruction.JBone

JointSurgAm.1986;68:1136–44.

31.ChecchiaSL,DoneuxPS,MiyazakiAN,FregonezeM,SilvaLA,

OliveiraFM,etal.Tenotomiaartroscópicadobicepsnas

lesõesirreparáveisdoManguitorotador.RevBrasOrtop.

2003;38(9):513–21.

32.PrasadN,OdumalaA,EliasF,JenkinsT.Outcomeofopen

rotatorcuffrepair.Ananalysisofriskfactors.ActaOrthop

Belg.2005;71(6):662–6.

33.GerberC,FuchsB,HodlerJ.Theresultsofrepairofmassive

tearsofrotatorcuff.JBoneJointSurgAm.2000;82(4):505–15.

34.FavardL,BacleG,BerhouetJ.Rotatorcuffrepair.JointBone

Spine.2007;74(6):551–7.

35.BoissonnaultWG,BadkeMB,WoodenMJ,EkedahlS,FlyK.

Patientoutcomefollowingrehabilitationforrotatorcuff

repairsurgery:theimpactofselectedmedicalcomorbidities.J

OrthopSportsPhysTher.2007;37(6):312–9.

36.FangMA,FrostPJ,Iida-KleinA,HahnTJ.Effectsofnicotineon

cellularfunctioninUMR106-01osteoblast-likecells.Bone.

1991;12(4):283–6.

37.VermaNN,PiaseckiD,BhatiaS,RomeoAA,BakerAL3rd,Cole

BJ,etal.Outcomesfollowingarthroscopicrevisionrotator

cuffrepair(SS-05).Arthroscopy.2009;25(6):e3.

38.WilkinsCH,BirgeSJ.Preventionofosteoporoticfracturesin

theelderly.AmJMed.2005;118(11):1190–5.

39.LucasTS,EinhornTA.Osteoporosis:theroleofthe

Imagem

Fig. 1 – Ages of the male patients.
Fig. 2 – Ages of the female patients.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The weight, height and calculated Z score for height/age and body mass index; bone mineral content, bone mineral density and adjusted bone mineral density were established

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate how bone mineral density in the calcaneus measured by a dual energy X-ray laser (DXL) correlates with bone mineral density in the spine and hip in Turkish

Conclusion: Preliminary results of the present study suggest that ultrasonography can identify bone abnormalities secondary to rotator cuff calcific tendinopathy, particularly

As was described in our article, and commented on by two readers, bone mass is assessed in terms of bone mineral content (CMO, in grams) and mineral density (DMO, the ratio of CMO

In this study on cases of extensive rotator cuff injury, with a retracted supraspinatus tendon and a deficient rotator interval, repair of the posterior portion of the rotator

Methods: This was a retrospective evaluation of patients who underwent arthroscopic revi- sion of rotator cuff injuries using the ASES, Constant &amp; Murley and UCLA scores and

The functional results from the patients who presented com- plete tearing of the rotator cuff alone, subsequent to traumatic dislocation of the shoulder, and who underwent

Methods: From the sample of the study conducted by our group in 2006, in which we evalu- ated the functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears, 35