• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. farmacogn. vol.26 número4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. farmacogn. vol.26 número4"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texto

(1)

w ww.e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / b j p

Original

Article

Profile

of

bioactive

compounds

of

Capparis

spinosa

var.

aegyptiaca

growing

in

Egypt

Riham

Omar

Bakr

,

Mahitab

Helmy

El

Bishbishy

PharmacognosyDepartment,FacultyofPharmacy,OctoberUniversityforModernSciencesandArts(MSA),Giza,Egypt

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received16December2015

Accepted26April2016

Availableonline21May2016

Keywords: Capparisspinosa

LC-HRESI-MS–MS Flavonoids Isothiocyanate Cytotoxicity

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Thepresentstudywasdesignedtoinvestigatepolyphenolicandsulphurcontentsoftheaerialpartsof Capparisspinosavar.aegyptia(Lam.)Boiss.,Capparaceae,wildlygrowinginEgypt.Thechemical com-positionsofthewaterdistilledessentialoilwereinvestigated byGC/MSanalysiswherethemajor constituentoftheoilwasmethylisothiocyanate(24.66%).Hydroethanolicextractwasevaluatedby LC-HRESI-MS–MSinbothpositiveandnegativemodes.Forty-twocompoundswereidentifiedincluding quercetin,kaempferolandisorhamnetinderivativesinadditiontomyricetin,eriodictyol,cirsimaritin andgallocatechinderivatives.Quercetintetrahexosidedirhamnosideaswellaskaempferol dihexo-sidedirhamnosidehavenotbeenidentifiedbeforeingenusCapparis.Phenolicacids,suchasquinic acid,p-coumaroylquinicacidandchlorogenicacidwerealsoidentified.Evaluationofcytotoxicactivity ofhydroethanolicextractagainstthreehumancancercelllines(MCF-7;breastadenocarcinomacells, Hep-G2;hepatocellularcarcinomacellsandHCT-116;coloncarcinoma)using 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazole-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide(MTT)assayshowedsignificanteffectwithIC50values24.5,24.4 and11␮g/ml,comparedtoDoxorubicinasastandardcytotoxicdrug.C.spinosarevealeditselfasa promisingcandidatefornutraceuticalresearches.

©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeFarmacognosia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Introduction

Capparaceaeis a closely related family tothemustard fam-ily(Cruciferae)withabundanceofglucosinolatesandflavonoids (Täckholm,1974;Inocencioetal.,2000;Kiddleetal.,2001).The genusCapparisisrepresentedinEgyptbysixspecies(Täckholm, 1974).Capparisspinosavar.aegyptia(Lam.)Boiss,(thecaper) grow-ingintheEgyptiandeserts,isaperennialwinter-deciduousplant thatbearsrounded,fleshy,alternativeleavesandthick,shiny,large whitetopinkish-whitecompleteflowers.Theplantisbestknown fortheediblebudandfruit(caperberry).InGreco-ArabandIslamic medicine,thedecoctionof rootbarkis prescribedas deobstru-entto liverand spleen, asanthelmintic and anti-inflammatory agents.Decoctionsfromtherootbarkhavebeenusedintraditional medicinesfordropsy,anemia,arthritis,andgout.Thestembarkis diuretic(SaadandSaid,2011).Thestrongflavorofcapersisusually duetotheverypungentmethylisothiocyanatethatisreleasedafter anenzymaticreactionwithamustardoilglycosidenamed gluco-capparin(methylglucosinolate)(Brevardetal.,1992;Romeoetal., 2007;Sozzietal.,2012).

∗ Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:[email protected](R.O.Bakr).

C. spinosa is considered as a very important source of medicine for antifungal (Ali-Shtayeh and Abu Ghdeib, 1999) anti-inflammatory(Al-Saidetal.,1988;Zhouetal.,2010), antidia-betic,antihyperlipidemic(Eddouksetal.,2005),antihypertensive (Baytop,1984),antihepatotoxic(GadgoliandMishra,1999), poten-tialinhibitorofNF-kappaB(Zhouetal.,2011),andanticarcinogenic (Kulisic-Bilusicetal.,2012).

Quantitation of flavonoid content in Capers revealed it as a very rich source of the flavonols (Inocencio et al., 2000). C. spinosa has been an interesting field of study. Estima-tion of phenolic compounds in the Croatian species revealed the presence of isorhamnetin-3-O-rutinoside besides chloro-genic acid derivatives and cinnamoyl-quinic acid derivatives (Siracusa et al., 2011). While in China, flavonoids identified in the fruits were isoginkgetin, and ginkgetin and Sakuranetin (Zhao et al., 2013). Egyptian species have been investigated a long time ago. Six glucosinolates were identified, such as glucoiberin,glucocapparin,sinigrin,glucocleomin,glucobrassicin and glucocapangulin. Also, four flavonoids were isolated from C. cartilaginea and C. deserti and identified as kaempferol-3-O-rutinoside,quercetin-3-O-rutinoside,quercetin-7-O-rutinoside and quercetin-3-O-glucoside-7-O-rhamnoside (Ahmed et al., 1972).

Besides the previously identified flavonoids, Quercetin-3-O -glucose-7-O-rhamnoside,quercetin3-O-glucoside andquercetin

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjp.2016.04.001

0102-695X/©2016SociedadeBrasileiradeFarmacognosia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://

(2)

3-O-[6′′′-␣-l-rhamnosyl-6′′-␤-d-glucosyl]-␤-d-glucoside have beenidentified(Sharafetal.,1997,2000).

StudiesconcerningthesulphurcontentofC.spinosa,revealed thepresenceofbutylisothiocyanate,methylisothiocyanate, iso-propylisothiocyanate,andsec-butylisothiocyanate(Afsharypuor andJazy,1999;Hamedetal.,2007).Nowadays,C.spinosaisalso commerciallycultivatedinseveralcountriesforitsfruits(Gulletal., 2015).

In the present study, the phenolic composition of the hydroethanolicextract(HEE)wascharacterizedusing LC-HRESI-MS–MS (liquid chromatography-high resolution electrospray ionization/mass spectrometry) and X calibur software. While theessentialoilwasdescribed usingGC/MS(Gas chromatogra-phy/massspectrometry).Inaddition,cytotoxicactivityoftheHEE wasevaluatedagainstdifferentcancercelllines.

Materialandmethods

Chemicals

ReagentsforHPLCanalysis:aceticacidandmethanolwereof HPLCgradeandpurchasedfromSigma–Aldrich(Steinheim, Ger-many).

Plantmaterial

Freshplantmaterial(Capparisspinosavar.aegyptia(Lam.)Boiss., Capparaceae)wascollectedfromDahab,SouthSinai,Egypt.The plantwasidentifiedbyAss.Prof.Dr.MonaMarzouk,Department ofPhytochemistryandPlantSystematics,NationalResearch Cen-ter,Egyptandavoucherspecimenoftheaerialpartswerekept attheherbariumofPharmacognosyDepartment,Facultyof Phar-macy,OctoberUniversityforModernSciencesandArts(no.RS014). Theplantsampleswereairdriedintheabsenceofdirectsunlight andgroundjustbeforeextraction.

Extractionofglucosinolates

Powdered air-dried aerial parts (100g) were subjected to hydrodistillation for 3h using Clevenger apparatus. A yellow volatileoilwascollected0.1ml.Thesampleoilwascollectedand freezedtillGC/MSanalysis(AfsharypuorandJazy,1999).

GC–MSanalysisofoil

GC–MSanalysisofthevolatileoilwasperformedusing Hewlett-Packard(HP)6890series(Agilent)GasChromatographySystem, interfacedtoHP5973series(Agilent)massspectrometer,equipped with an auto-sampler and a single capillary injector. TR-FAME (Thermo 260 M142P) (70% cyanopropyl-polysilphenylene sil-oxane)capillaryGCcolumn(30m×0.25mm,i.d.,×0.25␮mfilm thickness)wasused.Samplesizewas1␮l,oventemperature pro-grammedfrom50to230◦Cat5C/min,injectorporttemperature

200◦C,CarriergasHelium,Flowratewas1.5mlHe/min.

Identifica-tionofthevolatileoilconstituentswasbasedoncomparingtheir retentiontimes,andmassfragmentationpatternswiththoseofthe availablereferencesand/orwithpublisheddata(Adams,2004)as wellasthroughNIST-MSdatabaselibrarysearch.Thequantitative estimationwascarriedoutbyrelativepeakareameasurement.

PreparationoftheextractforLC-HRESI-MS–MS

Plant material (100g) was exhaustively extracted with 80% ethanol.Thecombinedhydroethanolicextracts(HEE)werefiltered,

concentratedinvacuumat50◦C,driedandleftforHPLC-MS–MS

analysisandcytotoxicityevaluation.

LC-HRESI-MS–MSapparatus

TheanalysiswasperformedonaBrukermicro-TOF-QDaltonics (API)Time-of-Flightmassspectrometer(Bremen,Germany), cou-pledto1200seriesHPLCsystem(AgilentTechnologies,Waldbronn, Germany),equippedwithahighperformanceautosampler,binary pump,andPDAdetectorG1314C(SL).Chromatographicseparation wasperformedonaSuperspher100RP-18(75×4mmi.d.;4␮m) column(Merck,Darmstadt,Germany).

Identificationofphenoliccompounds

ThemethodwasperformedaccordingtoHassaanetal.(2014). Mobilephaseconsistedoftwosolvents,(A)2%aceticacid(pH2.6) and(B)80%methanol.Theseparationwasperformedusing gradi-entelution,from5%to50%Bat30◦Cataflowrateof100␮l/min.

Theionizationtechniquewasanionspray(pneumaticallyassisted electrospray).Spectrawererecordedinpositiveandnegativeion modebetweenm/z120and1500withcapillaryvoltage,4000V and heated drynitrogen gastemperature,200◦C and flow rate

10l/min,thegasflowtothenebulizerwassetatpressure1.6bar. Forcollision-induceddissociation(CID)MS–MSmeasurements,the voltageoverthecollisioncellvariedfrom20to70eV.Argonwas usedascollisiongas.Dataanalysissoftwarewasusedfordata inter-pretation.Sodiumformatewasusedforcalibrationattheendof LC–MSrun.InterpretationforESI-MSwasperformedbyXcalibur 2.1softwarefromThermoScientific(Berlin,Germany).

Cytotoxicactivity

The cytotoxicity of HEE was assessed using MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay (FotakisandTimbrell,2006)againstthreehumancancercelllines; breast(MCF-7),liver(HEPG-2)andcolon(HCT-116) adenocarci-nomausingDoxorubicin®asreferencestandard.Dosedependent

activitieswerestudiedfrom5 to50␮g/ml,and theIC50 values (concentration which reduced survival to 50%) wereestimated fromgraphicplot.Threeseparateexperimentswereperformedfor eachsample.

Resultsanddiscussion

GC–MSanalysisofthevolatileoil

(3)

Table1

GC–MSanalysisofthevolatileoilconstituentsoftheaerialpartsofC.spinosa.

Peakno. Identifiedcompound RRta Area%

1 Isopropylisothiocyanate 0.72 12.44

2 p-Cymene 0.84 2.93

3 Methylisothiocyanate 1 24.66

4 Butylisothiocyanate 1.17 3.2

5 ␣-Copaene 1.49 4.57

6 Thujone 1.71 1.81

7 Caryophyllene 1.98 2.91

8 Camphor 2.11 1.66

9 Humulene 2.23 4.24

10 1,2,3,5,6,8a-Hexahydro-4,7-dimethyl-1-(1-methylethyl)-naphthalene 2.27 5.56

11 ␥-Muurolene 2.31 2.6

12 Unidentified 2.41 1.17

13 3-Cyclohexen-1-one 2.82 1.21

14 3-Methyl-4-isopropylphenol 3.67 3.98

15 Spathulenol 3.69 1.47

16 Muurolol 3.76 2.42

17 6,10-Dimethyl-2-undecanone 3.84 6.5

18 ␣-Cadinol 3.89 4.26

19 Unidentified 3.91 1.84

20 Unidentified 4.03 0.78

21 Tetracosane 4.22 0.55

22 Eicosane 4.46 1.3

23 Unidentified 4.54 0.75

24 Heptacosane 4.92 2.58

25 1-Naphthalenepropanol 4.99 0.58

26 2-Cyclohexen-1-ol 5.01 0.56

27 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylicacid 5.07 0.91

28 Isobutyl2-methylpent-3-ylester 5.35 1.07

29 Phenanthrene 5.45 1.02

30 Dibutylphthalate 6.24 0.46

Percentageofidentifiedconstituents 95.46%

Percentageofunidentifiedconstituents 4.54%

Majorconstituent Methylisothiocyanate

aRRt,relativeretentiontimeto:methylisothiocyanate=6.99min.

LC-HRESI-MS–MSanalysisofphenoliccompounds

LC–MS analysisdemonstrated thepresence of highly glyco-sylated flavonol in addition toflavone glycosides and phenolic acidderivativesaspreviouslyreportedindifferentcaperextract (Inocencioetal.,2000).Intotal,42compoundsbelongingto differ-entclasseswereidentifiedbyLC–MS/MS-HR-ESIintheHEEofthe aerialpartsofC.spinosa.Dataconcerningtheidentificationofthe peaksareshowninTable2,inwhichwereporttheretentiontime, electrosprayionizationmassspectrometryinnegativeand posi-tiveionmodeforallofthecompoundsdetected.Thestructuresof unknownphenolicacidsorflavonoidswereassessedbasedonthe m/zofbothprecursorionandfragmentionobtained.Moreover,the spectraldatawerecomparedwiththatreportedintheliterature.

Flavonoidswerethe majoridentified components with pre-dominance of flavonol class especially quercetin derivatives (fifteen compounds). New compounds were identified such as quercetintetrahexosideand quercetintetrahexoside dirhamno-side. Kaempferol derivatives have been also identified (seven compounds),isorhamnetinderivatives(sixcompounds)inaddition tomyricetin,eriodictyol,cirsimaritinandgallocatechinderivatives. Sugarmoietiesconsistofhexosides,deoxyhexosidesand pento-sidesasdeducedfromthelossof162,146and132urespectively (Ibrahimetal.,2015).

Quercetin(compound 26)wastentativelyidentified withits basepeakatm/z271.15andcharacteristicpeaksatm/z255,179and 151(Martuccietal.,2014),Quercetintetrahexoside(compound7), tentativelyidentifiedforthefirsttimeinthisgenus,showeda pre-cursorionatm/z949.24[M−H]andtheMS/MSledtoaproduct ionatm/z301.16denotingaquercetinderivative.Inthepositive ionization,precursorionpeakappearedatm/z951.26with prod-uctionsat789.24(M+H-hexose),627.34(M+H-dihexose),465.23

(M+H-trihexose)and303.19(M+H-tetrahexose)anddenotingthe quercetin.

Compound11,wastentativelyidentifiedasquercetin trihexo-siderhamnosidewithaprecursorionpeakat933.25[M−H]and productionpeakatm/z609.28[M−H-dihexose].Positive ioniza-tionshowedaprecursorionat[M+H]atm/z935.26withproduct ionsat789.1[M+H-rhamnose],627.09[M+H-rhamnose-hexose], 465.15 [M+H-rhamnose-dihexose] and 303.13 [M+H-rhamnose-trihexose]. Compound 20, tentatively identified as quercetin dirhamnosidehexosideshowedaprecursorionpeakatm/z755.2 [M−H] with product ions at m/z 593.3 [M−H-hexose], 447.1 [M−H-hexose-rhamnose], 301.2[M−H-hexose-dirhamnose] and acharacteristic peakforquercetinat271.21.Positiveionization showedsimilarfragmentationwith[M+H]atm/z757.22.

Compound34,withaprecursorionpeak[M−H]atm/z1095.25 and[M+H]atm/z1097.32showedproductionpeaksatm/z936.39 [M+H-hexose], 773.31 [M+H-dihexose], 627.19 [M+H-dihexose-rhamnose], 465.11 [M+H-trihexose-rhamnose], 303.07 [M+H-tetrahexose-rhamnose] was tentatively identified as quercetin tetrahexoside rhamnoside. Compound 40 tentatively identified as quercetindihexoside dirhamnoside, showeda precursor ion peak[M−H]atm/z917.23andpositiveionization[M+H]atm/z 919.27withproductionpeakat611.14[M+H-hexose-rhamnose], 465.15[M+H-hexose-dirhamnoside]and303.19 [M+H-dihexose-dirhamnoside].

(4)

Table2

PeakassignmentofmetabolitesinhydroethanolicextractofC.spinosausingLC-HRESI-MS–MSinthenegativeandpositivemodes.

No Rt(min) Compounds [M−H]−

m/z

Negativeionization MS/MS

[M+H]+m/z Positiveionization References

1 1.71 Gluconicacid 195.05 195.05129.07177.1

159.0799.07

197.08 197.08179.09135.10 Felipeetal.(2014)

2 1.89 Quinicacid 191.02 191.02111.08173.04 193.05 193.05175.01161.11

147.04133.03

3 22.23 Chlorogenicacid 353.09 353.09191.11269.21

293.2179.19

355.12 355.10337.19193.06

201.04267.01

Martuccietal.(2014)

4 30.34 Kaempferol-O

-glucoside

447.09 447.09285.14

(M−H-hex)325.21

327.21

449.11 449.11287.11 Rodrigoetal.(1992)

5 45.23 Quercetin-O-glucoside 463.09 463.09301.19

(M−H-hex)343.16

(M−H-120)

465.10 465.10303.10287.13 Martuccietal.(2014)

6 33.31 p-Coumaroylquinic

acid

337.06 337.06191.16179.15

135.22293.2

339.10 339.10320.22293.14

279.11206.18176.16

130.1

Martuccietal.(2014)

7 33.81 Quercetin

tetrahexoside

949.24 949.24625.30

(M−H-dihexose)

301.16

(M−H-tetrahexose)

787.40(M−H-hexose)

463.25

(M−H-trihexose)

951.26 951.26931.43789.24

(−162)627.34(−162)

465.23(−162)303.19

(−162)

8 34.97 Quercetintrihexoside 787.3 787.3621.29625.39

(M−H-hexose)463.31

(M−H-dihexose)

301.24

(M−H-trihexose)

789.23 789.23303.14627.23

(M+H-hex)465.17

(M+H-dihex)

Quetal.(2013)

9 35.43 Epigallocatechin

hexoside

467.12 467.12305.24 469.17 469.17307.02435.91

169.07144.05289.24

10 35.81 Quercetinrhamnoside

hexoside

609.15 609.15301.21

(M−H-Rh-hex)447.28

(M−H-hex)549.28

271.21255.09179.1

611.16 611.16303.12

(M+H-rh-hex)465.06

(M+H-rh)

Faléetal.(2013)

11 36.20 Quercetintrihexoside

rhamnoside

933.25 933.25609.28

(M−H-dihex)301.17

(609-rh-hex)

935.26 935.26789.1(M+H-rh)

627.09(M+H-rh-hex)

465.16(M+H-rh-dihex)

303.13 (M+H-rh-trihex)

12 36.73 Acacetinhexoside 445.21 445.21385.27283.19 447.23 447.23225.04386.94

429.25207.15189.23

LinandHarnly(2010)

13 54.70 Kaempferol 285.04 285.04255.11241.22

229.18213.13163.2

151.1396.97

287.08 287.08241.11269.19

213.07164.99152.99

133.05121.05

Martuccietal.(2014)

14 39.17 Eriodictyolhexoside 449.11 449.11287.15

(M−H-hex)387.28

281.23151.09137.15

451.12 451.12289.15

(M+H-hex)433.22

268.08

Zhaoetal.(2013)

15 39.38 Isorhamnerinhexoside

rutinoside

785.11 785.11623.28

(−M−H-hex)315.12

(M−H-hex-rh-hex)

787.23 787.23317.21

(M+H-rh-dihex)641.13

(M+H-rh)479.15

(M+H-rh-hex)

KimandPark(2009)

16 40.23 Eriodictyol-7-O

-rutinoside

595.17 595.17287.11

(M−H-rutinose)

597.18 597.18435.08

(M+H-hex)289.14

(M+H-hex-rh)577.26

451.07399.2

Zhaoetal.(2013)

17 40.27 Eriodictyol 287.06 287.06151.08125.18

135.07

289.07 289.07163271.13

152.98179.03143.96

Zhaoetal.(2013)

18 41.5 Eriodictyolglucuronide 463.09 463.09287.18301.17

403.23311.26175.09

151.09

Lietal.(2012)

19 43.21 Quercetin

glucoside-O-rutinoside

771.2 771.2609.15(-hex)

463.21(-rh)301.26

(-rh)

773.21 773.21465.18611.10

303.14627.15

Sharafetal.(2000)

20 43.91 Quercetin

dirhamnosidehexoside

755.2 755.2593.3(-hex)

447.1(-rh)301.2(-rh)

271.21

757.22 757.22624.16595.37

611.16449.24303.14

287.21

21 44.62 Myricetinrutinoside 625.14 625.14316.1317.16

(M−H-rh-hex)285.12

271.20479.20

(M−H-rh)607.26

179.08

62.16 627.16319.12

(M+H-rh-hex)464.22

481.11(M+H-rh)

Sójkaetal.(2009)

22 44.82 Cirsimaritinhexoside

rhamnoside

621.15 621.15313.15

(M−H-rh-hex)285.2

257.3

623.16 623.16477.09

(M+H-rh)315.11

(5)

Table2(Continued)

No Rt(min) Compounds [M−H]−

m/z

Negativeionization MS/MS

[M+H]+m/z Positiveionization References

23 59.85 Isorhamnetinhexoside 477.27 477.27315.34

(M−H-hex)

479.12 479.12317.09

(M+H-hex)301.15 360.86419.93459.27

24 45.53 Isorhamnetin

dihexoside dirhamnoside

931.27 931.27767.38

(M−H-hex)621.35 (M−H-hex-rh)315.19 300.08357.35785.40

933.29 933.29317.21

(M+H-dirh-dihex) 914.45771.29 (M+H-hex)769.29 625.22(M+H-hex-rh) 463.2(M+H-rh-dihex)

25 46.75 Gallocatechin 305.07 305.07290.2397.01

225.13275.22259.21

307.11 307.11130.06289.18 262.15242.16204 307.13265.16289.20 247.17178.12144.11

Hossainetal.(2010)

26 47.64 Quercetin 301.04 301.04271.15255.15

257.22179.15151.1

229.93

303.04 303.04285.05302.85 Martuccietal.(2014)

27 47.9 Quercetin-3-O

-hexose-O-pentoside

595.13 595.13301.16

(M−H-hex-pen)285.14

271.22433.43

(M−H-hex)463.27

191.16179.13

597.15 597.15303.12

(M+H-pen-hex)287.12

465.10(M+H-pen)

449.11

Martuccietal.(2014)

28 48.19 Kaempferolhexoside

dirhamnoside

739.21 739.21575.3649.43

429.29284.18255.1

741.22 741.22595.05

(M+H-rh)449.07

(M+H-dirh)287.13

(M+H-dirh-hex)

Rodrigoetal.(1992)

29 48.50 Apigenin8C-glucoside 431.1 431.1311.22

(M−H-120)341.18

(M−H-90)413.21

312.18

433.11 433.11415.23313.16

(M+H-120)397.23

367.18271.16

(M+H-hex)

Abad-Garcíaetal.(2008)

30 49.05 Kaempferolhexoside

rhamnoside

593.15 593.15285.21

(M−H-308)473.24

(M−H-120)503.24

(M−H-90)

595.16 595.16287.05

(M+H-rh-hex)449.11

(M+H-rh)576.38

431.24

Ferreresetal.(2011)

31 49.36 Isorhamnetin3-O

rutinoside

623.16 623.16315.22

(-rutinose)314.15

459.2460.38503.14

(−120)

625.18 625.18317.12

(M+H-rh-hex)479.02

(M+H-rh)

Rorizetal.(2014)

32 50.00 Quercetindihexoside 625.14 625.14301.2

(M−H-dihex)463.14

(M−H-hex)285.26

271.2

627.16 627.16465.11

(M+H-hex)303.10

(M+H-dihex)

Tedescoetal.(2015)

33 51.22 Kaempferol

glucuronide

461.07 461.07285.18381.27 463.09 463.09343.14427.21

299.11268.23

Martuccietal.(2014)

34 51.90 Quercetin

tetrahexoside rhamnoside

1095.29 1095.29609.3(rutin)

787.28(M−H-hex-rh)

483.2933.44

(M−H-hex)302.33

1097.32 1097.32627.19

(M+H-rh-dihex)936.39

(M+H-hex)773.31

(M+H-dihex)465.11

(M+H-trihex-rh) 303.07

(M+H-tetrahex-rh)

449.19(Q-rh)611.09

(rutin)787.39

35 54.13 Isorhamnetin 315.1 315.1271.2285.18

287.11300.11

317.07 317.07302.09285.1

271.13257.12165.07

139.02

Sánchez-Rabanedaetal.(2004)

36 54.24 Kaempferolrutinoside

hexoside

755.2 755.2285.15

(M−H-hex-rh)593.32

(M−H-hex)

757.22 757.22449.12

(M+H-hex-rh)595.15

(M+H-hex)611.10

(M+H-rh)287.09

(M+H-trihex-rh)

37 54.49 Myricetinhexoside

rutinoside

787.17 787.17625.24

(M−H-hex)479.23

(M−H-hex-rh)317.21

(M−H-dihex-rh)

789.19 789.19481.14

(M+H-hex-rh)319.2

(M+H-dihex-rh)

38 55.18 Isorhamnetin

glucuronide

491.08 491.08315.20 493.1 493.1317.16 Due ˜nasetal.(2008)

39 55.47 Quercetinacetyl

hexoside

505.13 505.13353.29459.29

485.31323.24301.20

151.03179.12191.09

Navarro-Gonzálezetal.(2015)

40 58.05 Quercetindihexoside

dirhamnoside

917.23 917.23609.31

(M−H-308)301.16

(M-H-308)

919.27 919.27611.14

(M+H-308)465.15

(M+H-rh)449.16

(6)

Table2(Continued)

No Rt(min) Compounds [M−H]−

m/z

Negativeionization MS/MS

[M+H]+m/z Positiveionization References

41 60.68 Myricetinhexoside 479.16 479.16317.18

(M−H-hex)273.18 258.29447.31461.34 389.12(M−H-90) 359.28(M−H-120)

481.19 481.19319.17

(M+H-hex)464.25 302.14285.21191.14

Raaletal.(2015)

42 62.14 Kaempferoldihexoside

dirhamnoside

901.24 901.24593.23

(M−H-rh-hex)285.2

(M−H-dirh-dihex)

739.44(M−H-hex)

903.27 903.27884.47

(M+H-H2O)287.16

(M+H-dirh-hex)757.16

(M+H-hex)595.23

(M+H-rh-hex)449.08

(M+H-dirh-hex)

rh,rhamnose;hex,hexose;Q,quercetin;pen,pentose.

Fragmentionsarelistedinorderofrelativeabundances.Ionsinboldfaceindicatethemostintenseproduction(100%relativeintensity).

Table3

CytotoxicactivityoftheHEEoftheaerialpartsofCapparisspinosaandDoxorubicinstandardagainsthumanbreastadenocarcinomacells(MCF-7),hepatocellularcarcinoma

cells(Hep-G2)andcoloncarcinomacells(HCT-116).

Cellline MCF-7 Hep-G2 HCT-116

C.spinosaHEE Doxorubicin C.spinosaHEE Doxorubicin C.spinosaHEE Doxorubicin

IC50(␮g/ml) 24.5±2.23 0.426±0.35 24.4±1.87 0.467±0.2 11±1.54 0.23±0.17

Dataarepresentedasmean±SDofIC50(␮g/ml)from3independentexperiments,triplicateforeach.

withproductionpeaksat611.10[M+H-rhamnose],449.12 [M+H-rhamnose-hexose]and287.09[M+H-rhamnose-dihexose].

Compound42,identifiedaskaempferoldihexoside dirhamno-side,showedaprecursorionpeak[M-H]atm/z901.24andpositive ionization[M+H]atm/z903.27withproductionsatm/z757.16 [M+H-rhamnose],595.23[M+H-rhamnose-hexose],449.08 [M+H-dirhamnose-hexose]and287.16[M+H-dirhamnose-dihexose].

IsorhamnetinhasbeenpreviouslyidentifiedinCapparis, how-ever, its derivatives have not. Compound 15, witha precursor ion[M-H]atm/z785.11and[M+H]atm/z787.23anddaughter ion peak at 641.13 [M+H-rhamnose], 479.15 [M+H-rhamnose-hexose]andbasepeakatm/z317.21[M+H-rhamnose-dihexose] wasidentified as Isorhamnetin hexoside rutinoside.Compound 23 was tentatively identified as isorhamnetin hexoside with [M−H]atm/z477.27whilecompound 24,tentativelyidentified as isorhamnetindihexoside dirhamnosidewith a precursor ion peak[M−H]atm/z931.27and[M+H]atm/z933.29,productions inthepositiveionizationat771.29[M+H-hexose],625.22 [M+H-hexose-rhamnose],463.2[M+H-dihexose-rhamnose] and317.21 [M+H-dihexose-dirhamnose].

TheseresultswereinagreementwithGulletal. (2015)and

Behnazetal.(2013)whoreportedC.spinosaleavestobeagood sourceof kaempferol,quercetin, rutin andisorhamnetin. While

Siracusaetal.(2011)reportedrutin,kaempferol,3-O-rutinoside, andisorhamnetin3-O-rutinosideasmajorflavonoidsinC.spinosa. Myricetinanditsderivativeshavenotbeenpreviouslyidentified inCapparis,however,itwastentativelyidentifiedwithits charac-teristicpeakatm/z317inthenegativeionizationandm/z319in thepositiveionization.

Flavoneswerealsopresent.Compound29,wasidentifiedas api-genin8-C-glucosidewithprecursorionatm/z433[M+H]inthe positiveionizationmode.Theproductionsobtainedwith cleav-ageofsugarringhavebeenproposedasdiagnosticions,where m/z313isobservedand m/z283diagnosticof6-C-glucoside is absent(Abad-Garcíaetal.,2008).C-glycosylflavonesproducesMS fragmentationpatternincludingdehydrationandcrossring cleav-ageoftheglucosemoiety thatproduces0,2 crossringcleavage [M−H-120]and0,3crossringcleavage[M−H-90](Martuccietal., 2014).

Phenolicacidswerealsoidentifiedasquinicacid,p-coumaroyl quinicacidandchlorogenicacid.

CytotoxicactivityoftheHEE

HEEofC.spinosashowedpromisingcytotoxicactivity.IntheUS NationalCancerInstitutePlantScreeningProgram,acrudeextract isgenerallyconsideredtohaveinvitrocytotoxicactivityiftheIC50 valueincarcinomacells,followingincubationbetween48and72h, islessthan20␮g/ml(Boik,2001).HCT-116wasfoundtobethe mostsensitivetoHEEwithcellviabilitylessthan50%atthe con-centrationof11±1.54␮g/ml.Investigationshoweddifferencein sensitivityofdifferentcancerouscells totheCapparisextractas hasbeenobservedwithmanyotherspecies(Foucheetal.,2008). PotencyagainstdifferentcancercelllineswaspresentedinTable3. Flavonoidshavebeenreportedtoexhibitprooxidantcytotoxicity againstcancercellsthroughtheROS-triggeredmitochondrial apop-toticpathway,therefore,responsibleforthepromisingcytotoxicity ofC.spinosaagainstvariouscancercelllines(Zhangetal.,2015).

Conclusion

C.spinosaisarichsource,notonlyofsulphurcompounds,but also withphenolic and flavonoid glycosides contributing toits powerfulcytotoxicactivity.C.spinosaissuggested tobeagood candidateforuseinnaturalmedicinewithhistoricalbackground.

Author’scontributions

RO suggested the point, wrote the manuscript, carried out extractionproceduresand interpretedLCMSanalysis.MH inter-pretedtheGC/MSdataofessentialoilandcytotoxicactivityofHEE andrevisedthemanuscript.

Conflictsofinterest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

Acknowledgments

(7)

References

Abad-García,B.,Garmón-Lobato, S.,Berrueta, L.A.,Gallo,B.,Vicente,F., 2008.

NewfeaturesonthefragmentationanddifferentiationofC-glycosidicflavone isomersbypositiveelectrosprayionizationandtriplequadrupolemass spec-trometry.RapidCommun.MassSpectrom.22,1834–1842.

Adams,R.P.,2004.IdentificationofEssentialOilComponentsbyGas

Chromatogra-phy/MassSpectroscopy.AlluredPublishingCorporationCarolStream,IL,USA.

Afsharypuor,S.,Jazy,A.R.,1999.Stachydrineandvolatileisothiocyanatesfromthe

unripefruitofCapparisspinosaL.DARU7,11–13.

Ahmed,Z.F.,Rizk,A.M.,Hammouda,F.M.,SeifElNasr,M.M.,1972.Glucosinolatesof

EgyptianCapparisspecies.Phytochemistry11,251–256.

Ali-Shtayeh,M.S.,AbuGhdeib,S.L.,1999.Antifungalactivityofplantextractsagainst

dermatophytes.Mycoses42,665–672.

Al-Said,M.S.,Abdelsattar,E.A.,Khalifa,S.I.,El-feraly,F.S.,1988.Isolationand

identi-ficationofananti-inflammatoryprinciplefromCapparisspinosa.Pharmazie43, 640–641.

Baytop,P.,1984.TherapywithMedicinalPlants(PastandPresent).Istanbul

Univer-sityPublications,Istanbul.

Behnaz,M.,Davood,E.A.,Atena,A.,2013.DiurnalchangeinrutincontentinCapparis

spinosagrowingwildinTafresh/Iran.Eur.J.Exp.Biol.3,30–34.

Boik,J.,2001.NaturalCompoundsinCancerTherapy.OregonMedicalPress,MN,

USA.

Brevard,H.,Brambille,M.,Chaintreau,A.,Marion,J.P.,1992.Occurrenceof

elemen-talsulphurincapers(CapparisspinosaL.)andfirstinvestigationoftheflavour profile.FlavourFragr.J.7,313–321.

Cuyckens,F.,Claeys,M.,2004.Massspectrometry inthestructuralanalysisof

flavonoids.J.MassSpectrom.39,1–15.

Due ˜nas,M.,Mingo-Chornet,H.,Pérez-Alonso,J.J.,Paola-Naranjo,R.D.,

González-Paramás,A.M.,Santos-Buelga,C.,2008.Preparationofquercetinglucuronides

and characterization by HPLC–DAD–ESI/MS. Eur. Food Res. Technol.227, 1069–1076.

Eddouks,M.,Lemhadri,A.,Michel,J.B.,2005.Hypolipidemicactivityofaqueous

extractofCapparisspinosaL.innormalanddiabeticrats.J.Ethnopharmacol. 98,345–350.

Falé,P.L.,Ferreira,C.,Rodrigues,A.M.,Cleto,P.,Madeira,P.J.A.,Florêncio,M.H.,Frazão,

F.N.,Serralheiro,M.L.M.,2013.Antioxidantandanti-acetylcholinesterase

activ-ityofcommerciallyavailablemedicinalinfusionsafterinvitrogastrointestinal digestion.J.Med.PlantsRes.7,1370–1378.

Felipe,D.F.,Brambilla,L.Z.S.,Porto,C.,Pilau,E.J.,Cortez,D.A.G.,2014.

Phytochemi-calanalysisofPfaffiaglomeratainflorescencesbyLC-ESI-MS/MS.Molecules19, 15720–15734.

Ferreres,F.,Gil-Izquierdo,A.,Valentão,P.,Andrade,P.B.,2011.Structural

characteri-zationofphenolicsandbetacyaninsinGomphrenaglobosabyhighperformance liquidchromatographydiodearraydetection/electrosprayionization multi-stagemassspectrometry.RapidCommun.MassSpectrom.25,3441–3446.

Fotakis,G.,Timbrell,J.A.,2006.Invitrocytotoxicityassays:comparisonofLDH,

neu-tralred,MTTandproteinassayinhepatomacelllinesfollowingexposureto cadmiumchloride.Toxicol.Lett.160,171–177.

Fouche,G.,Cragg,G.M.,Pillay,P.,Kolesnikova,N.,Maharaj,V.J.,Senabe,J.,2008.

InvitroanticancerscreeningofSouthAfricanplants.J.Ethnopharmacol.119, 455–461.

Gadgoli,C.,Mishra,S.H.,1999.Antihepatotoxicactivityofp-methoxybenzoicacid

fromCapparisspinosa.J.Ethnopharmacol.66,187–192.

Gull,T.,Anwar,F.,Sultanaa,B.,Alcayde,M.A.C.,Nouman,W.,2015.Capparisspecies:

apotentialsourceofbioactivesandhigh-valuecomponents:areview.Ind.Crops Prod.67,81–96.

Hamed,A.R.,Abdel-Shafeek,K.A.,Abdel-Azim,N.S.,Ismail,S.I.,Hammouda,F.M.,

2007.ChemicalinvestigationofsomeCapparisspeciesgrowinginEgyptand

theirantioxidantactivity.eCAM4(S1),25–28.

Hassaan,Y.,Handoussa,H.,El-Khatib,A.H.,Linscheid,M.W.,ElSayed,N.,Ayoub,N.,

2014.EvaluationofplantphenolicmetabolitesasasourceofAlzheimer’sdrug

leads.Biomed.Res.Int.,http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/843263.

Hossain,M.,Dilip,K.,Brunton,N.,Martin-Diana,A.,Barry-Ryan,C.,2010.

Character-izationofphenoliccompositioninLamiaceaespicesbyLC-ESI-MS/MS.J.Agric. FoodChem.58,10576–10581.

Ibrahim,R.M.,El-Halawany,A.M.,Saleh,D.O.,ElNaggar,E.B.,El-Shabrawy,A.O.,

El-Hawary,S.S.,2015.HPLC-DAD-MS/MSprofilingofphenolicsfromSecurigera

securidacaflowersanditsanti-hyperglycemicandanti-hyperlipidemic activi-ties.Rev.Bras.Farmacogn.25,134–141.

Inocencio,C.,Rivera,D.,Alcaraz,F.,Tomás-Barberán,F.A.,2000.Flavonoidcontent

ofcommercialcapers(Capparisspinosa,C.siculaandC.orientalis)producedin mediterraneancountries.Eur.FoodRes.Technol.212,70–74.

Kiddle,G.,Bennett,R.N.,Botting,N.P.,Davidson,N.E.,Robertson,A.B.,Wallsgrove,

R.M.,2001.High-performanceliquidchromatographicseparationofnaturaland

syntheticdesulphoglucosinolatesandtheirchemicalvalidationbyUVNMRand chemicalionisation-MSmethods.Phytochem.Anal.12,226–242.

Kim,H.,Park,S.H.,2009.Metabolicprofilinganddiscriminationoftwocacti

culti-vatedinKoreausingHPLC-ESI-MSandmultivariatestatisticalanalysis.J.Korean Soc.Appl.Biol.Chem.52,346–352.

Kulisic-Bilusic,T.,Schmöller,I.,Schnäbele,K.,Siracusa,L.,Ruberto,G.,2012.The

anti-carcinogenicpotentialofessentialoilandaqueousinfusionfromcaper(Capparis spinosaL.).FoodChem.132,261–267.

Li,F., Zhang,L.D., Li,B.C., Yang,J.,Yu, H.,Wan, J.B.,Wang, Y.T.,Li,P., 2012.

ScreeningoffreeradicalscavengersfromErigeronbreviscapususingon-line HPLC-ABTS/DPPHbasedassayandmassspectrometerdetection.FreeRadic.Res. 46,286–294.

Lin,L.Z.,Harnly,J.M.,2010.Identificationofthephenoliccomponentsof

chrysan-themumflower(ChrysanthemummorifoliumRamat).FoodChem.120,319–326.

Martucci,M.E.P.,DeVos,R.C.H.,Carollo,C.A.,Gobbo-Neto,L.,2014.Metabolomicsas

chemotaxonomicaltool:applicationinthegenusVernoniaSchreb.PLOSONE9, e93149.

Navarro-González,I.,González-Barrio,R.,García-Valverde,V.,Bautista-Ortín,A.B.,

Periago,M.J.,2015.Nutritionalcompositionandantioxidantcapacityinedible

flowers:characterisationofphenoliccompoundsbyHPLC-DAD-ESI/MSn.Int.J. Mol.Sci.16,805–822.

Qu,C.,Fu,F.,Lu,K.,Zhang,K.,Wang,R.,Xu,X.,Wang,M.,Lu,J.,Wan,H.,Zhanglin,

T.,Li,J.,2013.Differentialaccumulationofphenoliccompoundsand

expres-sionofrelatedgenesinblack-andyellow-seededBrassicanapus.J.Exp.Bot.64, 2885–2898.

Raal,A.,Boikova,T.,Püssa,T.,2015.ContentanddynamicsofpolyphenolsinBetula

spp.leavesnaturallygrowinginEstonia.Rec.Nat.Prod.9,41–48.

Rodrigo,M.,Lazaro,M.J.,Alvarruiz,A.,Giner,V.,1992.Compositionofcapers

(Cap-parisspinosa): influenceofcultivar, sizeand harvestdate.J. FoodSci.57, 1152–1154.

Romeo,V.,Ziino,M.,Giuffrida,D.,Condurso,C.,Verzera,A.,2007.Flavourprofileof

capers(CapparisspinosaL.)fromtheEolianArchipelagobyHS-SPME/GC–MS. FoodChem.101,1272–1278.

Roriz,C.L., Barros,L.,Carvalho,A.M., Santos-Buelga,C.,Ferreira, I.C.F.R.,2014.

Pterospartumtridentatum,GomphrenaglobosaandCymbopogoncitratus:a phyto-chemicalstudyfocusedonantioxidantcompounds.FoodRes.Int.62,684–693.

Saad,B.,Said,O.,2011.Greco-ArabandIslamicHerbalMedicine:TraditionalSystem,

Ethics,Safety,Efficacy,andRegulatoryIssues.JohnWiley&Sons,Inc.,Hoboken, NJ,pp.208–211.

Sánchez-Rabaneda,F.,Jáuregui,O.,Lamuela-Raventós,R.M.,Viladomat,F.,Bastida,

J.,Codina,C.,2004.Qualitativeanalysisofphenoliccompoundsinapplepomace

usingliquidchromatographycoupledtomassspectrometryintandemmode. RapidCommun.MassSpectrom.18,553–563.

Sharaf,M.,El-Ansari,M.A.,Saleh,N.A.,1997.FlavonoidsoffourCleomandthree

Capparisspecies.Biochem.Syst.Ecol.25,161–166.

Sharaf,M.,El-Ansari,M.A.,Saleh,N.A.,2000.QuercetintriglycosidefromCapparis

spinosa.Fitoterapia71,46–49.

Siracusa,L.,Kulisic-Bilusic,T.,Politeo,O.,Krause,I.,Dejanovic,B.,Ruberto,G.,2011.

Phenoliccompositionandantioxidantactivityofaqueousinfusionsfrom Cap-parisspinosaL.andCrithmummaritimumL.beforeandaftersubmissiontoa two-stepinvitrodigestionmodel.J.Agric.FoodChem.59,12453–12459.

Sójka,M.,Guyot,S.,Kołodziejczyk,K.,Król,B.,Baron,A.,2009.Compositionand

propertiesofpurifiedphenolicspreparationsobtainedfromanextractof indus-trialblackcurrant(RibesnigrumL.)pomace.J.Hortic.Sci.Biotechnol.,100–106 (ISAFRUITSpecialissue).

Sozzi,G.O.,Peter,K.V.,NirmalBabu,K.,Divakaran,M.,2012.Capersandcaperberries,

HandbookofHerbsandSpices.

Täckholm,V.,1974.Student’sFloraofEgypt,2nded.CairoUniversityCooperative

PrintingCompany,Beirut,pp.162.

Tedesco,I.,Carbone,V.,Spagnuolo,C.,Minasi,P.,Russo,G.L.,2015.Identificationand

quantificationofflavonoidsfromtwoSouthernItalycultivarsofAlliumcepaL. var.tropea(redonion)andMontoro(copperonion)andtheircapacitytoprotect humanerythrocytesfromoxidativestress.J.Agric.FoodChem.63,5229–5238.

Zhang,Q.,Cheng,G.,Qiu,H.,Zhu,L.,Ren,Z.,Zhao,W.,Zhang,T.,Liu,L.,2015.The

p53-induciblegene3involvedinflavonoid-inducedcytotoxicitythroughthe reactiveoxygenspecies-mediatedmitochondrialapoptoticpathwayinhuman hepatomacells.FoodFunct.6,1518–1525.

Zhao,H.-Y.,Fan,M.-X.,Wu,X.,Wang,H.-J.,Yang,J.,Si,N.,Bian,B.-L.,2013.

Chemi-calprofilingoftheChineseherbformulaXiao-Cheng-QidecoctionusingLiquid ChromatographycoupledwithElectrosprayIonizationMassSpectrometry.J. Chromatogr.Sci.51,273–285.

Zhou,H.,Jian,R.,Kang,J.,Huang,X.,Li,Y.,Zhuang,C.,Yang,F.,Zhang,L.,Fan,X.,Wu,

T.,Wu,X.,2010.Anti-inflammatoryeffectsofcaper(CapparisspinosaL.)fruit

aqueousextractandtheisolationofmainphytochemicals.J.Agric.FoodChem. 58,12717–12721.

Zhou,H.F.,Xie,C.,Jian,R.,Kang,J.,Li,Y.,Zhuang,C.L.,Yang,F.,Zhang,L.L.,Lai,L.,Wu,

T.,Wu,X.,2011.BiflavonoidsfromCaper(CapparisspinosaL.)fruitsandtheir

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The compounds (0.15 – 20 m M) were tested for cytotoxic activity against cell lines HCT-116 (human colorectal carcinoma, ATCC # CCL-247), A-549 (human lung adenocarcinoma, ATCC #

All compounds synthesized in this study and another related terpenoid-like chalcone were also evaluated for their cytotoxic activity against three cancer cell lines (SF-295, HCT-116

The human tumour cell lines used were NCI-H292 (lung mucoepidermoid carcinoma), MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma) and HEp-2 (epidermoid carcinoma of the larynx) obtained from

were designed, synthesized and their cytotoxic activity evaluated using HCT-116 (colon adenocarcinoma), MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma) and RPE (human nontumor cell line from

MCF-7 (Human breast cancer cell line), SGC7901 (human gastric carcinoma cell line), LS-174T (human colon adenocarcinoma cell line) and A549 (human lung adenocarcinoma cell)

cytotoxicity studies of these compounds: A549 and H1975 cell lines, human lung carcinoma and. human lung adenocarcinoma

The methanolic extract showed significant in vitro cytotoxic activity against four human cancer cell lines such as colon (DLD-1, SW-620), breast (MCF-7), head and neck (FaDu)..

Cytotoxic effects of Nepeta binaloudensis various extracts on MCF-10A (Normal), MBA-MD-231 and MCF-7 (cancer) breast cell lines.. Cells were treated for 24, 48 and 72 h with