• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Cholera in the Americas

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Cholera in the Americas"

Copied!
36
0
0

Texto

(1)

W_

executive committee of worMng party of

the directing council the regional committee

PANAMERICAN

WORLD

HEALTH

HEALTH

ORGANIZATION

ORGANIZATION

107th Meeting Washington, D.C.

June 1991

Provisional Agenda Item 7.1 CE107/25 (Eng.) 21 June 1991 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH

CHOLERA IN THE AMERICAS

For the first time in nearly a century, epidemic cholera struck the Americas in January 1991. During the past five months, over 220,000 cases occurred in Peru, Ecuador and Colombia, with

additional cases in Chile, Brazil and the United States of

America. Other countries can be expected to experience epidemics

in future months and years, and cholera may become endemic in some areas of the Region. Therefore, it is essential that all countries be prepared for the possible introduction of cholera with the development of national plans for cholera control. National plans

should include elements of surveillance, crisis management,

financial planning, case management, epidemiological investigation, environmental sanitation, food safety, health education, laboratory

studies, and information management. PAH0 should support the

development and implementation of national plans, develop a

Regional plan and identify potential external resources for

national and regional prevention and control efforts. The sharing of resources and information about cholera will greatly facilitate control of the disease in the Region. Ultimately, significant resources will have to be provided by the countries and obtained from international donors in order to correct deficiencies in the health and environmental infrastructures that have contributed to

the spread of cholera.

Members of the Executive Committee are asked to review this

document for the purposes of discussion and to decide on policy

suggestions for the Directing Council and guidance for the

(2)

CE107/25 (Eng.) C01qTENTS

Page

I. Historical Background ... 1

II. Eptdemiologtcal Situation ... 1

III. Response of the Pan American Health Organization ... 3

(3)

CE107/25 (Eng.)

CHOLERA IN THE AMERICAS

I. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

Most countries of the Americas were affected by the second through

the fifth pandemics of cholera that spread widely between the 1830s and

the 1890s. Fortunately, the Americas were free of epidemic cholera for the first 90 years of this century, which has been attributed, at least in part, to the installation of water treatment in virtually all major cities of the Americas beginning at the turn of the century. Water filtration was widespread by 1870 and chlorination by 1910. The Americas succeeded in being the only region free of cholera during the first 30 years of the seventh pandemic, which began in Indonesia in 1961 and reached much of the world during its first 10 years, including West Africa in 1970. Cholera spread rapidly through Africa from 1970 to 1973 and has remained endemic in several countries since then. Epidemics also occurred in Italy, Portugal and Spain in the 1970's, but cholera was eliminated from these countries after appropriate control measures were implemented. Imported cases were reported by Canada and the United States of America, and since 1973, the United States has also reported occasional autochthonous cases related to the consumption of poorly -cooked seafood caught along the Gulf coast. However, the strains of Vibrio cholerae serogroup O1 isolated from autochthonous cases in the United States were distinct from the pandemic biotype, V. cholerae E1 Tot.

II. EPIDEMIOLOGICAL SITUATION

A. Peru

The first cases of cholera in Peru were reported on 23 January in Chancay, on the coast near Lima, and almost simultaneously in Chimbote, a major port 400 km to the north. V. cholerae, serogroup 01, biotype E1 Tot, serotype Inaba, was isolated and identified by the National Institute of Health in Peru and subsequently confirmed by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control. Over the next week, cases were reported in Lima, Piura

(4)

CE107/25 (Eng.) Page 2

management of diarrhea patients through continuous training activities. However, the case-fatality ratio has exceeded 2_ in several interior departments where educational campaigns have been less effective and health care is less readily available (Figures 3 and 4).

Epidemiological investigations in Peru have revealed several mechanisms which are responsible for the spread of cholera. The major

risk factor in the cities has been drinking untreated or unboiled water.

Environmental studies in the earlier stages of the epidemic found high

levels of fecal coliforms and no residual chlorine in several municipal

water systems. Vibrio cholerae was isolated from at least three water

systems, as well as from multiple environmental samples, including river

and coastal waters. Other risk factors include consumption of food and

beverages, especially ice, from street vendors, eating food left for more

than three hours without refrigeration and without reheating, and placing

hands directly into drinking water stored in household containers.

Additional factors considered important in Peru have been raw seafood

consumption, principally as ceviche, and the discharge of untreated waste into rivers and the ocean.

B. Ecuador

The first case of cholera in Ecuador was reported on i March,

approximately one month after the epidemic's onset in Peru, and occurred

in E1 Oro Province among a group of shrimp fishermen who worked in

Peruvian waters. The community probably spread its infection through a

well which was contaminated by a septic tank that overflowed at high tide. Since then, cholera has reached 19 provinces of Ecuador with 20,188 cases and 343 deaths (Table 2). The highest attack rates have been along the coast. While the incidence of cases nationally appears to be reaching a plateau (Figure 5), some areas continue to experience

increased numbers of cases.

C. Colombia

Colombia reported its first case on 10 March, when an adult male living on the Mira River 20 km south of Tumaco, in Narino Province (located on the Pacific coast at the border with Ecuador), was confirmed to have V. cholerae infection. He had no history of travel or apparent connection with Ecuador or Peru. Subsequent cases were reported on and after 26 March from Tumaco and Salahonda. Since then, the infection has spread to five other provinces: Cauca and Valle on the coast and Meta, Amazonas and guaviare in the interior. However, over ?0_ of the 1,780 probable cases reported by 31 May had occurred in Narino Province (Figure 6), while only eight cases were identified in the interior provinces. Colombia has had 28 deaths from cholera (Table 3).

D. Brazil

(5)

CE107/25 (Eng.)

Page 3

Benjamin Constant); six of these cases were imported (Table 4). The most

recent case in this area occurred on 28 May. Two additional cases were identified in Pontes-e-Lacerda in Mato Grosso State, but any association with the other cases is unclear.

E. Chile

Chile reported its first case on 12 April in an adult male living in the metropolitan area of Santiago. Since then, Chile has confirmed 40 cases and one death, all in persons 10 years of age and older (Figure 7). Ail but six cases were in the Santiago area, and 35 cases occurred in April (Figure 8). The last case occurred on 27 May (Figure 9). The most

important risk factor has been the consumption of raw vegetables (Figure 10). Measures to restrict the distribution of vegetables irri-gated with sewage-contaminated water have been implemented to control the

cholera epidemic in Chile.

F. United States of America

The first case of cholera in the United States in 1991 occurred on 9 April in an individual who attended a medical conference in Lima. Sub -sequently, 13 additional cases have been confirmed in the United States, one in a person who travelled to South America and 12 in persons who ate meat from two different crabs brought in noncommercially by travelers returning from Ecuador. There has been no evidence of subsequent spread

in the United States.

III. RESPONSE OF THE PAN AMERICAN HEALTH ORGANIZATION

A. Overall Response

When cholera cases were first detected, the PAHO/WHO Representative (PWR) Office in Peru and the Pan American Center for Sanitary Engineering and Environmental Sciences (CEPIS), located in Lima, immediately became involved in assisting Peru confront the epidemic. At PAHO Headquarters, a Cholera Task Force was formed to coordinate the international response, identify human and financial resources to address the emergency and provide essential information to Member Countries and other agencies. The Task Force, which meets several times each week, includes represent-atives from the PAHO Programs dealing with diarrheal diseases, laboratory, emergency preparedness and disaster relief, information, communicable diseases, environmental sanitation, food safety, research, and

eptdem-iology. The focal point is the Health Situation and Trend Assessment

Program.

One of the first concerns of the Organization was to assure that Peru had the means to provide the necessary medical attention for cholera cases. Shipments of additional oral rehydration salts (ORS), intravenous

(6)

CE107

/

25

(Eng

.

)

P

age

4

r

e

qu

e

s

t

f

o

r

U

S

$

3

.

8

4

m

ill

i

on,

which

was

pr

e

pared

b

y

the

P

e

ruvian

Hinist

r

y

o

f

Heal

t

h.

PAH0 has

processed

$2.09

million

in

external

assistance

t

o

Peru,

of which

about

half

ha

s

been

for

medical

supplies

and

OR

S

.

Another

i

mm

edi

a

te

concern

w

a

s

the

ec

o

nomic

i

m

p

a

ct

of

the

initial

restric

t

ions

pl

a

ced

on

t

he

imp

o

rtation

of

Peruvi

a

n

products

by

s

o

me

Governments.

A speci

a

l

effort

was m

a

de

t

o

provide

inf

o

r

ma

tion

a

bout

the

l

o

w

level

o

f

risk

a

nd

t

o

cl

a

rify

the

situation,

in

o

rder

to

avoid

o

r

r

e

mov

e

restrictive

p

o

licie

s

and

am

e

liorat

e

t

h

e

ir

impa

c

t.

PAIt0

ha

s

c

o

nt

i

nu

e

d

t

o

ad

v

i

s

e

aga

in

s

t

r

es

t

ric

t

i

on

s

o

n

i

mpor

ted

pro

du

c

ts

as

ot

he

r

c

o

untrie

s

ha

ve

bec

om

e

infe

c

te

d

.

As

e

ff

o

r

t

s

to

c

o

ntr

o

l

th

e

ep

id

em

ic

br

oade

n

e

d

,

app

r

o

xim

ate

ly

$1 milli

o

n

o

f

ext

e

rnal

funds

has

been

us

ed

f

or

envir

o

nmental

s

a

nit

a

ti

o

n,

health

educa

t

ion,

l

a

bor

ato

ry

su

ppo

rt

and

related

int

e

rventions.

T

he

PWR

Office

has

been

extremely

a

c

t

ive

in

su

ppo

rting

the

loc

a

l

p

urchase

and

dis

t

ribu

t

i

o

n

of

su

pp

lies

and

ac

q

uiring

needed

technic

a

l

ex

p

ertise.

All

PAH0

o

ffices

h

a

ve

been

involved

in

dissemin

a

ti

o

n

of

he

a

l

t

h

inform

a

ti

o

n

t

hr

o

ugh

television

and

news

p

a

p

ers,

includi

n

g

sp

ecial

su

pp

le

m

en

t

s

on

choler

a

p

reven

t

ion.

It

should

be

mentioned

t

h

at

c

o

nsiderable

assistance,

bo

t

h

in

m

at

eri

a

l

a

nd

p

ersonnel,

has

been

p

rovided

t

o

Peru

by

other

Hember

Co

u

ntries,

and

PAH0

has

reg

a

rded

t

his

a

s

an

excellent

exa

mp

le

of

technic

a

l

c

oop

er

a

ti

o

n

a

nd

coll

a

b

o

ration.

Th

e

PWR Office

has

a

ctively

co

o

rdin

a

ted

much of

t

he

bil

a

ter

a

l

a

ssis

t

ance

t

o Peru.

In

t

he

o

t

her

L

a

tin

A

m

erican

c

o

untries

a

ffec

t

ed

by

cholera,

the

res

p

onse

of

t

he

PAH0

/

_t0

Offices

has

been

a

s

p

r

omp

t

a

nd

com

p

rehensive

a

s

in

Peru.

PAH0 e

p

ide

m

iol

o

gis

t

s

and

o

t

her

staff

have

been

inv

o

lved

in

field

inves

t

iga

t

ions

and

have

a

ssisted

the

g

o

vernment

s

to

institute

control

me

a

sures.

Headqu

a

r

t

ers-based

st

a

ff

h

a

ve

p

rovided

technic

a

l

a

ssistance

in

many

are

a

s,

including

case

man

a

gement,

environ

m

en

ta

l

s

a

ntit

a

tion,

f

oo

d

safety

and

o

thers.

B.

Emergency

Resp

onse

and Resource

Mobilization

C

r

isis

m

an

a

ge

m

ent

is

app

licable

t

o

large-scale

emergencies.

In

a

ddition

t

o

t

he

e

p

idemiologic

a

l

inf

o

rm

a

tion

p

rovid

e

d

by

PAH0

t

o

a

ll

member

coun

t

ries,

information

on emergency

health

needs

has

been

ch

a

nnel-led

regul

ar

ly

t

o

t

he

Office

of

the

Uni

t

ed

Na

t

ions

Dis

a

s

t

er

Relief

Coordi-nat

o

r

(UNDR0).

UNDR0's

situ

a

tio

n

re

po

rts

h

a

ve

been

distributed

worldwid

e

a

mong

U.N.

m

ember

countries

a

nd

have

been

an

effective

mechanism

for

securing

and

c

oo

rdina

t

ing

in

t

ern

at

i

o

n

a

l

a

ssis

t

ance.

Funds

were

al

s

o

s

o

ught

a

nd

ob

ta

ined

from

bilat

e

ral

and

multilateral

a

gencies,

including

the

Eur

op

ean

C

o

mmunity

and

the

G

o

vern

m

ents

of

Can

a

da,

Germany,

the

Netherland

s

,

the

Uni

t

ed

Kingd

o

m

and

Ireland.

A gran

t

for

$1 million

by

(7)

CE107/25 (Eng.) Page 5

d

The strengthening of national capacities in rapid resource

mobilization, intercountry and intersectoral cooperation, emergency

logistics and communication have been promoted by PAH0 as important

components of the emergency phase of the cholera prevention and control strategy in the Region. At the country level, health disaster coordi-nators have been deeply involved in the daily management of the emergency,

in cooperation with other agencies, such as the civil defence units, the Red Cross and various nongovernmental organizations.

C. Diarrheal Disease Control

Together with USAID and UNICEF, PAHO has assisted all Member

Countries with and without cholera to develop a highly effective

diarrheal disease control program. During the epidemic, support for this

program has continued, and PAHO has sought to strengthen the local

production of ORS. Emphasis also has been placed on appropriate case

management, including vigorous rehydration and the preferential use of

ORS rather than intravenous fluids whenever possible. Technical guide -lines for cholera case management have been produced and distributed for adaptation at country level. A training module on cholera, describing

the eptdemiological and clinical characteristics and laboratory and control procedures, was also prepared and distributed to all countries.

D. Epidemiolo_¥

Investigations to document the distribution of cholera and factors involved in its transmission were begun as soon as the first cases were

reported. Several of these studies were done by the Peruvian Field

Epidemiology Training Program. Because of the size of the epidemic, epidemiological assistance was requested from the Centers for Disease Control, and several other countries sent epidemiologists. Eventually, the investigations broadened to include environmental and food

contami-nation studies, also supported by expert consultants. As a result, a fairly complete picture of the epidemiology of cholera in Peru has been developed, allowing the implementation of specific control measures.

PAHO epidemiologists have provided technical assistance to Ecuador and Colombia and have been closely involved in several field investi-gations. In Chile, epidemiological information has permitted the

success-ful implementation of specific interventions. Investigations in Brazil

have defined the extent of disease, which up to this time has been

limited.

It has been important to provide information about cholera preven-tion and control to all countries, so that they could take measures to prepare for the possible introduction of cholera. Within days of the first reports from Peru, the draft lggl revision of the WHO Guidelines for Cholera Control was sent to all countries. The Guidelines were

(8)

C

E

107

/

25

(Eng.)

Pa

g

e

6

A

mee

ting

att

en

d

e

d

by

r

e

pr

e

s

en

tativ

e

s

fr

om

17

Lati

n

Am

e

rican

c

o

untri

e

s

was

held

at

the

end

o

f

April

t

o

review

ch

o

lera

preventi

o

n

and

c

o

ntr

o

l

measu

r

es

and

assist

t

he

c

o

untries

t

o

prepare

comprehensive

nati

o

nal

plans.

S

i

m

ilar

meetings

were

held

at

the

Caribbean

Epidemi

o

l

o

gy

Cente

r

for

the

English-speaking

Caribbean

c

o

un

t

ries

and

in

S

an

J

o

s_,

Cos

t

a

Rica,

f

o

r

Central

America

and

Panama.

All

c

o

unties

o

f

the

Regi

o

n

have

initiated

plans

f

o

r

ch

o

lera

su

r

veillance,

preventi

o

n

and

c

o

ntr

o

l,

and

many

have

actively

put

their

plans

int

o

effect.

E

.

Environ

mental

He

alth

Co

nsiderable

eff

o

rt

has

been

made t

o

identify

environmental

fact

o

rs

tha

t

have

cont

r

ibuted

t

o

the

spread

o

f

ch

o

lera

in

P

e

r

u

and,

p

ot

en

t

ially,

in

o

ther

c

o

untries.

Emergency

meas

u

res

have

been

implemented

t

o

improve

drinking

wa

t

e

r

quality

,

princip

a

lly

by

assuring

adequate

chl

o

rinati

o

n

where

piped-water

systems

exis

t

and

by pr

o

viding

practical

means

o

f

disin-fecti

o

n

where

syste

m

s

do n

o

t

exist

o

r

are

inadequate.

Emphasis

has

als

o

been

placed

o

n intensified

m

o

nit

o

ring

o

f

water

quantity

and

water

quality

c

o

ntrol.

Efforts

are

being

made

t

o

i

m

pr

o

ve

human

waste

disp

o

sal

in

c

o

mmunities

and h

o

spitals.

F.

F

ood Safety

The

majority

of

cholera

o

utbreaks

worldwide

have

been

ass

o

ciated

with

c

o

ntaminated

food

pr

o

ducts,

such

as

raw molluscan

shellfish

harvested

in

waters

contaminated

with

raw

o

r

p

oo

rly

treated

human

sewage.

There-f

o

re,

e

d

uca

t

i

o

n

a

l

campaign

s

have s

o

ugh

t

to

ins

t

ruct

pe

o

ple h

o

w

to

prepare

a

nd handle

f

oo

d

s

in

o

rder

t

o

av

o

id

c

o

ntaminati

on

with

and

t

r

ansmissi

o

n

o

f

V. ch

olerae.

The presence

o

f

ch

o

ler

a

in

o

ne

c

o

unt

r

y

has

o

ften

gener

a

ted

fear

in

o

ther

c

o

untries

,

which

have

s

o

metimes

attempted

t

o

prevent

the

intr

o

duc-ti

o

n

o

f

ch

o

lera

b

y

b

a

n

n

ing

imp

o

rts

fr

om

infected

c

o

untries.

H

o

wever

,

there

has

bee

n

n

o do

cu

m

ented

instance

o

f

the

intro

d

uction

o

f

ch

o

ler

a

f

rom

c

o

m

m

e

r

cial

f

o

od

pr

o

ducts

,

and

such

a

n

intr

od

ucti

o

n

is

unlikely

t

o

o

ccur.

S

ince

all

o

f

affected

c

o

untries

in

So

uth

A

m

erica

export

f

ood

pr

o

ducts

t

o

o

ther

c

o

untries

within

a

nd

o

utside

the

Regi

o

n

,

PAH

O

has

a

dvised

c

o

untries

o

f

the

li

m

ited

risk

ass

o

ciate

d

with

these

pr

o

ducts

and

sought

t

o

insure

that

thei

r

imp

o

rtati

o

n

is

n

o

t

u

nn

ecessarily

restricte

d

o

r

b

anned.

H

o

wever

,

a

few

c

o

untries

,

including

s

om

e

i

n

Latin

America

,

continue

t

o

res

t

rict

i

m

p

o

r

t

s

fr

om

c

o

un

t

ries

rep

o

rting

ch

o

lera.

G.

Lab

oratory

Th

e

a

b

ility

t

o isolat

e

and

c

onfirm V

. eholerae

is essential in all

(9)

CE107

/

25

(Eng

.

)

P

a

ge

7

H.

Vaccines

P

AH0 a

nd

WHO hav

e

rec

omm

e

n

de

d

t

hat

c

h

o

lera

v

a

c

c

i

n

e

sh

o

ul

d

n

o

t

be

used

f

o

r

c

o

ntr

o

l

o

f

epide

m

ics

because

t

h

e

existing

paren

t

eral

vaccine

has

limited

p

rotective

efficacy

and

d

o

es

not

p

revent

trans

m

issi

o

n

o

f

V

.

ch

olerae

.

New

ch

o

ler

a

v

a

ccines

hav

e

been

investigated

in

ot

h

e

r

Regi

o

ns

,

a

nd PAH0 conven

e

d

a meeting

of

ch

o

lera

vaccine

experts

o

n 2

6 a

nd

27 April

to

f

o

r

m

ulate

rec

o

mmendations

on th

e

approach

to

v

a

ccines

in

t

his

hemis

p

here

.

The

experts

reaffirmed

that

the

existing

paren

t

er

a

l

v

a

ccine

should

not

be

used

for

prev

e

ntion

o

r

c

o

ntrol

.

They

did

r

ec

o

mmend

t

h

a

t

s

t

udies

o

f

both

the

ora

l

whole

cell

,

B subuntt

killed

vaccine

a

nd

t

he

o

ral

live

at

t

enuated

vaccin

e

be

ini

t

ia

t

ed

in

several

La

t

in

Americ

a

n

countries

during

1991

and

t

hat

,

should

the

results

be pr

o

mising

,

larger-scale

field

trials

be

c

o

nduc

t

ed

in

1992

.

P

AH0

/

A

E

R

0

should

c

oor

dinate

th

e

se

studies

f

o

r

Member

Count

r

ies

,

in

conjucti

o

n

with

the

Diarrheal

D

i

sease

Co

ntr

o

l

Pr

o

gr

a

m

at

WHOHeadquart

e

rs

.

I

.

Information

The

demand

for

inf

o

rma

t

ion

on

ch

o

lera

f

r

om

the

public

,

the

p

ress

and

heal

t

h

communi

t

ies

has

g

ro

wn

exp

o

nentially

since

the

o

u

tbre

a

k

in

t

he

Americas

was

firs

t

repor

t

ed.

PAH0 has

t

a

ken

an

a

ctive

role

in

repondtng

to

inquiries

,

believing

it

essential

t

o

pr

ovide

inf

o

rm

a

ti

o

n

to

all

conce

r

ned

c

o

mmunities

and

that

a

full

understanding

of

the

situati

o

n

will

lead

t

o

more

r

a

ti

o

nal

and

effective

responses

.

Television

and

r

a

di

o

interviews

have

been

a

r

r

a

nged

,

and

mate

r

ials

describing

the

ch

o

ler

a

situati

o

n

,

history

,

environment

a

l

health

m

e

a

sures

,

epidemiol

o

gy

and

t

he

li

m

ited

risk

of

transmissi

o

n

thr

o

ugh

commercial

f

oo

d

p

ro

ducts

have

been

dis

t

ributed

widely

.

PAH0 h

a

s

p

rovided

full

sup

po

rt

to

c

o

untry-level

health

educati

o

n

efforts

,

sending

a vid

eo

and

p

hot

o

g

r

a

p

hy

crew

t

o

Peru

to

obtain

m

a

t

erials

for

educ

a

t

i

on

a

nd

informa

t

ion

campaigns.

PA

H

0 has

als

o

worked

cl

o

s

e

ly

wi

t

h

PW

R

Off

i

ces

to

disseminate

ra

p

idly

inf

o

rma

t

ion

o

n h

o

w

to

p

revent

cholera

,

es

p

eci

a

lly

t

o

those

a

t

highest

r

isk

of

inf

e

cti

o

n

.

Because

of

the

u

r

gent

need

t

o

inf

o

rm

p

e

op

le

in

all

sect

o

rs

,

sev

e

ral

elements

of

education

a

l

c

a

m

pa

igns

were

developed

simult

a

neously

,

whil

e

formulating

a

larger

,

long-

t

erm

project

and

seeking

funding

to

su

pp

ort

t

he

c

o

un

t

ries

in

their

eff

o

r

t

s

t

o

inform

and

educ

a

t

e

the

public

.

P

A

H0

has

already

developed

a

n

inf

o

rmation

kit

,

t

o

be

disse

m

in

a

ted

t

hr

o

ugh

P

UR

Offices

,

cont

a

ining

instructi

o

nal

manuals

o

n how t

o

o

rganize

a

nd

op

er

at

e

a public

health

information

campaign

;

vide

o

s

of

TV commercials

sup

p

orting

nation

a

l

cam

p

aigns

and

documen

t

aries

on

cholera

;

radi

o

s

p

o

t

s

;

print

m

aterials

f

o

r

press

releases

;

fac

t

sheets

on cholera

and

its

p

reven

t

ion

;

a

nd phot

o

graphs

a

nd drawings.

I

V

.

P

L

ANN

I

N

G

F

O

R

THE FUTU

R

E

F

o

r

p

lanning

and

oper

a

ti

o

n

a

l

p

u

rpo

ses

,

the

r

esponse

t

o

the

choler

a

epidemic

can

be

divided

int

o

emergency

and

l

o

ng-term

p

h

a

ses

.

The

emergency

p

h

a

se

will

include

th

o

se

me

a

sures

which

a

re

needed

t

o

c

o

ntrol

the

p

resent

e

p

idemic

,

reduce

the

i

m

m

edi

a

te

thre

a

t

of

future

e

p

idemics

a

nd

(10)

i

CE107

/

25

(

E

ng.)

P

a

ge

8

phase

is

d

irected

at

i

m

p

ro

ving

the

inf

r

as

tr

uc

t

u

r

e

of

health,

f

oo

d

safe

t

y

and

envir

o

nmental

services

s

o

that

the

threat

o

f

ch

o

lera

is

eliminated

f

ro

m

t

he

Regi

o

n

during

the

next

10 years.

A.

Em

er2enc¥ Phase

A Regi

o

nal

Plan

f

o

r

Cholera

P

r

eventi

o

n

and

C

o

ntr

o

l

has

been

devel-o

ped

as

the

basis

for

Regi

o

n

-

wide

activi

t

ies

du

r

ing

the

next

2 to

3 years,

which

will

c

o

m

p

l

e

m

e

nt

acti

o

n

s

taken

within

the

_emb

e

r G

0

unt

r

_e

s.

Th

e

Regional

Plan

has

three

gene

r

al

o

bjectives

:

i)

Reduce

the

risk

o

f

the

spread

of

chole

r

a;

ii

)

Reduce

morbidity

and mo

rt

ality

associa

t

ed

wi

t

h

chole

r

a;

and

iii)

Reduce

the

s

o

cial

and

economic

impact

of

cholera

.

There

are

five

components

o

f

the

plan

:

-

The

fi

r

st

c

o

mp

o

nent

is

support

o

f

nati

o

nal

plans

,

which

itself

includes

five

priori

t

y

areas

f

o

r

acti

o

n:

a)

nati

o

nal

cholera

commissi

o

ns

should

be

established

and

s

t

rengthen

e

d

t

o

c

oo

rdinate

devel

o

pment

and

implementa

t

i

o

n

of

nati

o

nal

plans

and

prepa

r

e

o

perational

pr

o

cedures

f

o

r

obtaining

and

distributing

materials

and supplies;

b)

active

surveil-lance

for

cholera

should

be

implemented

to

promptly

iden

t

ify

and

report

the

epidemi

o

logic

characteristics

o

f

any

cases

t

ha

t

occur;

c)

p

ro

per

case

management

should

be

taught

to health

care

providers

and sufficient

supplies

f

o

r

t

r

eatment

should

be

available

in

l

o

cal

health

systems;

d)

in

t

e

r

ven

t

i

o

ns

t

o

impr

o

ve

water

quality

and

f

oo

d

safe

t

y

and

t

o

disp

o

se

safely

o

f

human

waste

from

selected

l

o

cations

(e.g

.

,

h

o

spitals)

are

pri

o

rities,

with

emphasis

being

placed

o

n

r

apid,

practical

measures

in

the

emergency

phase;

and,

e)

community

pa

rt

icipati

o

n

must

be

strengthened

if

the

proposed

inte

r

ventions

are

to be

implemen

t

ed

succ

e

ssfully

.

- The

second

c

o

mp

o

nent

o

f

t

he

Regi

o

nal

Plan

is

the

dissemination

of

info

r

mation

ab

o

ut

effec

t

ive

preventi

o

n

and

con

t

r

o

l

m

easures,

financial

and

human

resources

,

laborat

or

y

procedures

,

and

o

the

r

matters

which

will

be

important

f

o

r

effective

acti

o

n

in

the

c

o

untries

and

regi

o

nally

.

- The

third

c

o

mponent

is

the

initia

t

i

o

n

and

supp

o

rt

of

r

esearch

on

o

ral

ch

o

lera

vaccines

(whole

ce11

/

B

subunit

and

live

-

a

t

tenuated),

evaluation

of

interventi

o

n

stra

t

egies

,

and

assessmen

t

of

r

apid

diagnos

t

ic

meth

o

ds

.

- The

f

o

urth

c

o

mponen

t

is

th

e

mo

bilizati

o

n

o

f

technical

and

financial

resources

t

o

complement

nati

o

nal

resources.

All

o

cation

o

f

r

es

o

urces

should

be

co

o

rdinated

between

g

o

vernments,

interna

t

i

o

nal

agencies,

universi

t

ies,

the

private

sector,

n

o

ng

o

vernmental

organizati

o

ns

and

o

the

r

expert

gr

o

ups

and

individuals

.

(11)

CE107/25 (Eng.) Page g

The objectives of emergency measures in the Member Countries are a) to limit the extent of the cholera epidemic and b) to reduce the im-pact from cholera where the disease is present. Measures to be instituted

or continued in the countries include the purchase and distribution of additional materials and supplies, enhanced surveillance, proper case management, improved food safety, health education, improved water

quality, monitoring of water quality and proper disposal of waste from selected locations (especially hospitals). Ail of these measures have been initiated by countries affected by cholera and have been included in national plans developed by other countries. The Organization has

estimated that $600 million will be needed to put the measures into effect in all countries and continue them during the emergency phase. Half of this amount will have to come from external sources, with the remainder being provided by the countries themselves.

B. Long-Term Interventions: Strategies for the lgg0s

The cholera epidemic is the most obvious and dramatic health

consequence of the economic crisis of the lg80s. More than $200 billion

has been transferred abroad since lg82 to pay the interest on private and

public debt. The resulting gap between existing resources and needs has

meant deteriorating capital stock in all sectors. Economies in the Region

have been stifled by the absence of capital for new investment in every

area of physical infrastructure. Studies undertaken by PAH0 and by the

Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) have shown a drastically reduced

level of investment in health, water and sanitation in contrast to the

level of need.

Beyond the emergency phase, a major investment program is needed

to respond to three critical gaps in environment and health in the

Americas:

- First, the repair and full protection of existing water and

sanitation systems. Currently, water systems barely reach 7g% of the

population in Latin America and the Caribbean, and sanitation systems

reach only 66% of the population. Many existing systems have not been

properly maintained or operated;

- Second, the extension of potable water, sewage treatment and garbage disposal systems to those without services.

- Third, the strengthening of national and local health systems

and the extension of the health services network, within the primary

health care strategy, to the 40_ of the Region's population which

continues to be without access to adequate care.

These actions are essential long-term steps to prevent the spread

of cholera and other diarrheal diseases as well as to reduce overall

morbidity and mortality in the Americas from diseases which are

prevent-able or readily treatable. Nearly 700,000 people die each year in the

Americas from those diseases. These objectives must be realized if the

health needs of the people of the Americas are to be met. They also

represent the bare minimum for fulfilling the goals set during the lg80s

(12)

CE107/25 (Eng.) Page l0

PAH0, the World Bank, IDB and USAID participated in an evaluation of the Decade and found that approximately one third of the needed

invest-ment in water and sanitation had been made during that period, half

of those funds coming from external sources. Thus, the countries were

$20 billion short of the original $30 billion investment target (expressed in 1980 US dollars).

The fact that barely 5_ of all municipal water systems in the Americas treat sewage before it is discharged into rivers, bays and ult i-mately the sea is another indicator of unmet need. The current PAH0 and World Bank estimate of the costs for investment in water and sanitation infrastructure in the Americas to make up the shortfall remaining from the 1980s and to cover anticipated population growth through the year 2000 is approximately $77 billion (in 1985 US dollars).

It is estimated now that about US$140 billion will be necessary to achieve the goals in regard to environmental health during the next 12 years.

With respect to the third element in the long-term strategy for responding to the cholera crisis, the provision of health services, the countries in Latin America and the Caribbean currently are expending approximately US$40-$45 billion per year for health. To extend basic services to those lacking them and to improve the utilization of the existing capacity will mean increasing the level of investments by $5-6 billion per year during the next decade. With utilization of the primary health care strategy and full implementation of SILOS, adequate access to

services would be achievable with the lower amount.

In summary, it is estimated that some $200 billion in investment over the next 12 years will be necessary to achieve the extension of health, water and sanitation services. Approximately 70% of the amount will be provided by the countries themselves, but 30% will be required

from external sources.

Achieving those flows of resources to health is clearly within the capacity of the countries and the international community. It will mean:

- First, directing 1.5 to 2.0% of GNP annually from the countries of the Region to capital investment in water and sanitation systems as well as in health infrastructure.

- Second, the allocation at least of 20% of the official, external bilateral and multilateral financial assistance to health, water and

environmental sanitation.

- Third, the use of debt swaps for increased investment in health, water and environmental sanitation.

(13)

CE107/25 (Eng.) Page 11

(14)

Figure 1

Cumulative Cases of C

h

olera in Peru, by Department

30 May 1991.

PIUJ

LAMBAYEQUE

ANCASH

LIMA-CALLAO

Not reported

...

< 1

0

.._

10 < 100

1O0< 1000

1000 <10,000

10,000+

Source:

(15)

Figure

2

C

h

olera Cases an

d H

ospitalizations in Peru

b

y epi

d

e

m

iological

w

ee

k

, as of 10 June 1991.

Cases

14,000

12

,0

00

...

10

,

000

...

8

,000

6,0

00

"--

-

-4

,0

00

--2

,

0

00

0 __L__

L

__

--_

1 2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10 11 12 1

3 1

4 15 16

17

1

8

19 20

21 2

2 23 24

Epi

d

emiological Week

Hosp

i

t

a

l

i

za

ti

ons

_

C

a

ses

Source:

Ministry of

Health, Peru

(16)

3

Reported

Deaths From Cholera

in Peru

by epidemiological

week,

1991

Dea

t

hs

2

5

0

200

-150

100

5O

0

i

f

i -_ [[_

_i

_i

_i

J

,

i

i

2 3 4 5

0

7 8 9 I0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 10 19 20 21 2223 24 25

epidemiological

week

Source: Ministry of Ilealth, Department of Epldemlology.

(17)

Figure

4

Cholera E

p

idemic Case Fatality Rate in Peru,

by Department,

as of 10 June 1991.

I

f

C

u

sco

I

I

M

a

dre de D

ies

L

a

L

i

bert

a

d _

BB

Ay

ac

u

c

h

o

Pa

sco _

BB

[]

Lore

t

o

_

BB

Caja

m

a

rc

a

_

BB

Am

a

z

o

n

as

__

U

cayali

Sa

n

Martin

__

J

u

n

i

n __

P

u

n

o

__

H

u,

_n

uco

__

Ica

__

T

ac

n

a

__

Hua

n

ca

v

elica

_11

La

m

ba

y

eque

P

iu

r

a

mm

T

u

mbe

s

mm

Ar

eq

u

ipa

[]

A

ncash

L

i

_

m

a

_

Me

a

n

(1.

0

)

Callao

·

A

puri

m

ac I!

I I I I

0

5

10

15

2

0

De

a

th

s p

er

1

00 C

a

ses

(18)

Fi 5

Cholera. Cases in

E

cuador

by epldemlologlcal

week,

as of 23 May, 1991.

C

ases

35

00

3000

-2500

-2

00

0

-

1500-

1000-500

-0

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

1

7

18

19

20

21

E

pidemio

l

ogi

c

al

W

eeks

·

C

a

s

es

I

R

eg

r

e

ssi

on

l

i

ne

Source:

N

atio

n

al

D

epartment

of Epi

d

e

m

iology

(19)

Figure 6

E

volution of Cholera in Narino, Co

l

omb

i

a

by epidemiological

weeks,

:3 March through

18 May, 1991.

2

5O

200

150

100

-

50-10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

Pro

b

a

b

le

_

Hospitalizations

_

Confirme

d

_

Deaths

Referências

Documentos relacionados

No final da década de 80, os governantes cabo-verdianos cada vez mais sentiam a necessidade de tomar medidas bem concretas para que, efectivamente, o

The probability of attending school four our group of interest in this region increased by 6.5 percentage points after the expansion of the Bolsa Família program in 2007 and

financeiras, como ainda por se não ter chegado a concluo entendimento quanto à demolição a Igreja de S. Bento da Ave-Maria, os trabalhos haviam entrado numa fase

Brazil reported 5 suspected cases of cholera, of which one imported case from Peru has been confirmed in Tabatinga, Amazonas State.. Historical Background of Cholera in

Noting the changing situation of the epidemiology of AIDS and HIV infection in the Region and the status of national and regional AIDS prevention efforts in the Region;..

This latter event was of great importance to the science of epidemiology, not only because it clearly demonstrated that water was a vehicle of cholera

Industrial workers as a group will continue to loom large in future mass radiog- raphy plans; however, a program is already under way, through the cooperative

The variation in median age of persons from whom a particular sero- type was isolated may indicate differences in the vehicles, the infectious dose, or other