А А І
А
І
А
І
І
І
І
А
І А
А І
А
А К я
ґ я
є А К . В я я ’є
, я ,
-я я
А К.
: , , , ,
, .
.
«
»,
,
(
).
є
,
є
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
.
.
є
,
.
,
,
є
.
,
,
є
,
є
є
,
.
є
.
А
.
,
. . [1],
. . Д2],
. . Д5],
є . . Д6],
. . Д14], є
. . Д17],
. . Д18],
E. Д21].
,
є
,
-.
,
,
. . Д4],
. . Д16],
. . Д15],
. [19],
.,
. [20].
є
,
.
є
.
.
(
) –
, ’є
є
,
.
є 4
:
1.
(
),
є
,
,
,
.
..
2.
,
:
,
,
.
3.
,
:
,
.
4.
–
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
. . Д14, .
302]
є
:
;
;
;
,
,
,
;
;
;
,
;
;
.
'є
є [7; 8]:
,
є
(
,
,
,
є
);
,
є
(
,
,
.
.),
;
,
,
;
,
;
,
;
;
;
.
’
є
,
.
,
.
є
є
,
.
,
(
-
60 )
(
,
'
,
,
)
.
,
.
,
є
«
»
є 70-80%
, є
.
-,
ґ
є
,
,
.
є
,
,
є
.
’є
,
є
є
,
є
,
є
,
.
,
є
.
,
:
,
є
.
є
,
є
,
–
,
.
. 1
,
є
,
.
,
(
)
(
).
,
,
,
.
є
,
'
,
'
,
–
я 1
–
А
,
1
2
-
1. .
2. , .
3. ,
, ++++ ++++ ++ - 1. . 2. . 3. .
4. .
5. . 6. , . 7. . 8. +++ ++ +++++ +++++ +++++ ++++ ++++ +++++ +++++ +++++ -1. . 2. . 3. . 4. - . 5. +++ +++ + + ++++ 1. , ’ , . 2. . 3. + + ++++
1. .
2. . 3. . 4. , +++++ +++++ +++++ +++ 1. ` .
2. є
MRP ERP.
3. GPS-
. 4. - ++ +++++ +++++ +++++ ++++
* : 1 – «+» є
; 2– є, є , – є
,
є
є
,
є,
,
є
,
.
є
.
є
2009
.
2011
40,4%,
Є ,
є
34,5%.
'є
,
2011 . є
,
145,2
є
,
26-30%).
:
– 2,6
.;
–
2
.;
–
2
.;
–
0,5
.;
,
,
0,05
.;
0,3
.
Д4,
. 4].
є
-
є
'
.
,
,
.
є
.
-
,
є
є
.
.
є
.
,
.
,
,
.
,
є
,
'
є
.
є
,
є
,
,
є
,
.
,
.
.
.
є
.
є
.
,
'є
,
.
,
,
є
є
’
,
:
,
,
.
.
Д15],
є
є
–
.
.
є
,
є
,
.
є
,
,
.
є
.
.
,
,
.
,
,
є
,
.
,
.
«
»:
,
,
.
є
(
,
),
,
є
(
,
).
50%.
.
FC,
є
.
(
)
.
є
.
,
,
є
.
,
є
,
«
»
є
[9].
«
»
є
.
є
,
є
,
.
,
,
є
,
є
’є
,
,
.
17%
.
,
,
,
,
є
Д13,
. 387].
є
.
є
,
,
.
,
Є
,
є
,
є
1,5
.
[9].
-
,
-
Д3].
,
.
є,
є
,
,
.
є
(
).
(
), 'є
(
-
)
'є
(
,
)
.
20
є
–
,
–
10 500
. .
,
, –
,
,
,
,
Є
є
100
.
є
.
:
,
1
.
.
є
.
40
.
.
,
73%
[11].
.
,
,
.
«
Ernst & Young
» Д11]
,
,
,
,
.
, є
,
30%
,
.
,
2011 .
410
.
Д10]
є
.
7%,
.
,
,
200
є
20000 є
5
,
8%
28
. є
5600 є
,
28 є
/ .
90 є
/
є 3,1
1
,
– 3,9%
80 / .
2500
2,24 є
/
0,25
/
,
45 / 0,55%
Д
10
].
є
18%
.
5
6000 є
/ .
1000 є
(
.
.)
10%
(2000 є
400 є
).
є
7400 є
.
791800
/ .
,
є
–
є
7%
.
600
є
42 .
є
,
80 є
/ ,
5%
.
2500
:
5% (80
2500∙0,05) +10000 є
/ ;
– 7400 є
/ ;
– + 2600 є
/ .
є
2500
.
2600 є
= 27820
(11,12
/ )
.
,
.
'
,
.
ґ
(
)
є
.
,
,
.
є
.
.
є
,
–
«
».
.
2500 .
36500 є
(
є
15000 є
21500 є
).
є
.
є 1500 є
,
23000 є
(21500 + 1500), +20%
,
–
27600 є
.
,
,
1500 .
5,15 є
/
0,61 /
1,36%
:
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
є
.
є
.
–
,
є
,
.
2500 ,
є
,
1500
,
5000
.
,
є
:
10000 є
/ ;
22500 є
/ ;
32500 є
/ ;
15680 є
/ ;
(
) 16820 є
/ = 10020
/ .
,
.
. .
. .
Д6]
(
. 2).
.
я 2
–
,
3 + ( )
66 600 24 000 70000 21 000
243 000 85 000 251 000 75 000
.
.
,
,
.
,
є
'є
.
'є
є
є
,
–
'є
.
є
,
є
,
,
.
,
Є
’є
.
'
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
(
)
Д16].
є
,
,
.
-
є
Д5],
.
,
-
,
,
,
-
,
'
.
( ,
, )
1
–
А
,
(
Д5],
)
,
є
(
. 3).
’є
.
-
,
,
:
1)
–
-
;
2)
–
;
3)
–
є
є
'
.
,
є
,
,
.
,
,
.
.
.
я 3
–
є є , є
є .
є
є , є ,
, є
є , ,
є
є
( , )
,
«
» (
Green Box
Pol c Оs
),
є
,
,
.
є
«
» є
,
.
«
»
'
.
«
».
,
-
,
,
,
,
,
-
,
.
.
є
.
є
,
є
.
,
є
,
.
є
є
,
.
є
.
’є
,
.
.
-
.
1. . . /
. . . – . : NOTA BENE, 2007. –220 .
2. . .
Д ] / . . , . . //
: . – 2013. –№ 6. – :
http://www.science-education.ru/106-7722. 3.
2,5 . – 13 . Д ] //
. – 09.04.2013. – : http://www.kmu.gov.ua/control/
uk/publish/article?art_id=246241186&cat_id=244277212.
4. . . / . . . – .: , 2012. – 385 .
5. . . –
Д ] / . . , . . //
. – 2006. –№ 2. – :
umc.gu-unpk.ru/umc/arhiv/2006/2/Miylenko_Igmulkina.doc
6. . .
/ . . , . . //
( ). – 2012. –№ 7 (15). –
: http://sisp.nkras.ru/e-ru/issues/2012/7/ognev.pdf.
7. . . : /
. . // : . – 2011. –№ 8. –
. 295-299.
8. . . : -
: . … - . , . : 08.00.05 –
/ . . . – .: ,
2013. –48 .
9. Д
].– : http://news.finance.ua/ru/~/1/0/all/2007/03/20/95472.
10. Д ]. – :
http://www.gps.com.ua/article_info.php?tPath=5&articles_id=10.
11. .
Д ]. – :
http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Agricultural-market-article-ukraine/$FILE/Agricultural-market-article-ukraine.pdf.
12. . .
є / . . // : . – 2008. –
№ 13. – . 277-282.
13. . .
14. . . - –
/ . . // . – 2011. –
. 2. – . 1. – . 301-307.
15. . . / . . . – 3- ., . . – .:
-, 2008. – 191 .
16. . .
/ . . // . – 2011. –
№ 1. – . 22-28.
17. . . -
/ . . // . – 2009. –№ 4. – . 64-69.
18. . .
/ . . // . 10: . –
2007. –№ 2. – . 85-92.
19. Agrawal V.M. Is Leasing Greener than Selling? / V.M. Agrawal, L.B. Ferguson Toktay, V. Thomas // Management Science. – 2012. – Vol. 58 (3). – P. 523-533.
20. Bhaskaran S. Implications of Channel Structure for Leasing or Selling Durable Goods / S. Bhaskaran, S. Gilbert // Marketing Science. – 2009. – Vol. 28(5). – P. 918-934.
21. Fraser E. High tech farming, local food systems, food aid, or strict environmental regulation? How the American dust bowl can teach us to deal with drought / E. Fraser // Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper. – 2012. – No. 110, Sustainability Research Institute Paper No. 38.
.В. е , - . , , ,
;
В.Ю. Ш а, . . , ,
;
В.А. е ья е ,
А
В я А К
я
я я А К . я
я я , я
- я я я
я
А К.
: , , , ,
, .
O.V. Prokopenko, Doctor of Economics, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Economics and
Management, Head of the Economic Theory Department of Sumy State University;
V.Yu. Shkola, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the
Economic Theory Department of Sumy State University;
V.A. Omelyanenko, PhD Student of the Economic Theory Department of Sumy State University
Analysis of the use of international leasing in terms of improving the effectiveness of technology transfer by the example of agroindustrial complex
The aim of the article. The aim of this study is analysis of leasing transactions in the context of innovative agricultural development based on international and cross-sectoral technology transfer.
The results of the analysis. Authors proved that as a result of the complexity of relationships characterized by considerable agricultural potential cross-industry technology transfer, which can be defined as the use of technology to other sectors of the economy to improve agricultural production. The presence of this potential is due to the fact that different sectors have the same problem and solve most of the same ways.
evaluation of the use of the existing asset and its potential effect in Ukraine. Also indicated the need for international leasing technology-based evaluation of their development in Ukraine, based on patent statistics and expert opinions. The analysis showed that the majority of high technology that could potentially be implemented in the agricultural sector should be borrowed abroad.
The calculation of the potential effectiveness of some high-tech foreign origin in agriculture for example medium-sized farms is shown.
International leasing is characterized by significant risk of accelerated depreciation facility lease. Since the object of lease agreements often serve foods high technology industries, they are very much dependent on the impact of scientific and technological progress. Therefore, as a result of the market more efficient analog facility lease the lessee seeks to replace obsolete equipment and early termination of the lease agreement or the conclusion of the contract in the form of a renewable lease.
As part of an integrated approach to agricultural development model we propose to improve the regional center for agricultural technology, making its constituent center leasing of agricultural technology. Center will, firstly, provide information on research and development and commercialization in the agricultural sector using leasing to help implement existing innovative potential and to create conditions for technology transfer, and secondly, create a feedback between the business and academic sectors. Regional agricultural technology transfer system will function most efficiently in clustering and involves working four specialized structures.
At the level of institutional factors in the full realization of the innovation potential in the field of international leasing agriculture also depends on the expansion of the list of leasing contracts in law and control of the state for innovative level of imports.
Conclusions and directions of further research. Agroindustrial complex is a very labor-intensive
industry, which is characterized by seasonal and dependent on weather phenomena. At present, the profitability of industries Ukraine is very low, so it is necessary the restoration of assets and attract high-tech equipment that will save resources and increase network capacity resources.
With effective regulation of international leasing potential lies in its innovative features, providing opportunities to increase the technological level of the real economy by enabling domestic enterprises to use not only new equipment, but modern foreign technology, using leases. International Leasing at this stage is an effective form of solutions to complex economic problems. With international leasing of all world countries cooperate with each other to yield significant benefits, particularly in the field of restoration technology.
In further research is necessary to determine the mechanisms of incorporation of innovative potential in the state regulation of cross-border leasing. These actions should be based on the need to develop domestic production and sales of existing scientific and technical potential of agriculture.
Keywords: international leasing, technology, innovation, agriculture, international technology
transfer, production.
1. Aiupov, A.A. (2007). Konstruirovanie i realizatsiia innovatsionnyh finansovyh produktov [The design and implementation of innovative financial products]. Moscow: NOTA BENE [in Russian].
2. Baranova, O.A. (2013). Sistema hosudarstvennoho stimulirovaniia innovatsionnoi deiatelnosti v APK [The system of government stimulation in innovation in agriculture]. Sovremennyie problemy nauki i obrazovaniia – Modern Problems of Science and Education,,6. Retrieved from: http://www.science-education.ru/106-7722 [in Russian].
3. V Ukraini zbilshat vyrobnyctvo vitchyznianyh vysokoproduktyvnyh kombainiv do 2,5 tys. i traktoriv – do 13 tys. [In Ukraine domestic production of harvesters will increase to 2,5 thousand and tractors - up to 13 thousand] (09.04.2013). Pres-sluzhba Ministerstva ahrarnoi polityky ta prodovolstva – Press office of the Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Retrieved from: http://www.kmu.gov.ua/ control/uk/publish/article?art_id=246241186&cat_id=244277212 [in Ukrainian].
4. Zerkalov, D.V. (2012). Mezhdunarodnyi lizinh [International leasing]. Kyiv: Osnova
[in Russian].
6. Ohnev, D.V. (2012). Innovatsionnaia kompleksnaia metodika rascheta lizinhovoho platezha pri uchete imushhestva na balanse lizinhopoluchatelia [Innovative complex method of calculation taking into account the lease payment for the property lessee]. Sovremennye issledovaniia sotsialnyh problem – Modern Studies of Social Problems, 7(15). Retrieved from: http://sisp.nkras.ru/e-ru/issues/2012/7/ognev.pdf [in Russian].
7. Salomatin, V.A. (2011). Innovatsionnye protsessy v APK: sushchnost i napravleniia razvitiia [Innovation processes in agriculture: the nature and direction of development]. Teoriia i praktika obshchestvennoho razvitiia – Theory and Practice of Social Development, 8, 295-299 [in Russian].
8. Salomatin, V.A. (2013). Razvitie tabakovodstva Rossii: orhanizatsionno-ekonomicheskie i innovatsionnye aspekty [The development of tobacco farming in Russia: organizational, economic and innovative aspects]. EбtОndОd abstract oП Doctor’s tСОsТs. Moscow: GNU VNIIESH Rosselhozakademii
[in Russian].
9. Selskoe hoziaistvo Ukrainy yavliaetsa riskovannym dlia lizinha [Ukrainian agriculture is risky for the lease]. news.finance.ua. Retrieved from: http://news.finance.ua/ru/ ~ / 1/0/all/2007/03/20/95472
[in Russian].
10.Selhoztehnika i urozhai [Farm machinery and harvest]. gps.com.ua. Retrieved from: http://www.gps.com.ua/article_info.php?tPath=5&articles_id=10 [in Russian].
11.Sychov, A. (n.d.). Prohnozy i perspektivy razvitiia selskohoziaistvennoho rynka [Forecasts and
prospects of development of agricultural market]. ey.com. Retrieved from:
http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/Agricultural-market-article-ukraine/$FILE/Agricultural-market- article-ukraine.pdf [in Russian].
12.Topishko, T.I. (2008). Lizyng yak priorytetnyi instrument zaprovadzhennia investytsii ta innovatsii na pidpryiemstvah APK [Leasing as the preferred tool for implementing investment and innovation in enterprises of APC]. Ekonomichnyi prostir– Economic Space,13, 277-282 [in Ukrainian].
13.Trusova, N.V. (2013). Monitorynh finansovo-kredytnoho zabezpechennia ahrarnoho sektoru ekonomiky Ukrainy [Monitoring of financial and credit support of the agricultural sector of Ukraine]. Ekonomichnyi forum – Economic Forum, 1, 386-390 [in Ukrainian].
14.Tiutiunnyk, M.H. (2011). Naukovo-tehnichnyi prohres – osnova ekonomichnoho zrostannia ahrarnoho vyrobnyctva [Scientific and technological progress as abasis of agricultural production growth]. Naukovi pratsi Poltavskoi derzhavnoi ahrarnoi akademii – Proceedings of Poltava State Agrarian Academy, V. 2, 1, 301-307 [in Ukrainian].
15.Filosofova, T.H. (2008). Lizinh [Leasing]. Moscow: YUNITI-DANA [in Russian].
16.Filkevich, I.A. (2011). Osobennosti mezhdunarodnoho lizinha v usloviiah formirovaniia tehnicheskih rehlamentov EvrAzeS i Tamozhennoho soiuza [Features of the international leasing in the formation of technical regulations of the Customs Union and the Eurasian Economic Community]. Lizing – Leasing, 1, 22-28 [in Russian].
17.Tsvetkova, L.A. (2009). Innovatsionno-orientirovannoe predprinimatelstvo v kontseptsii ekonomicheskoho razvitiia APK [Innovation-oriented enterprise in the concept of economic development of agribusiness]. Kreativnaia ekonomika – Creative Economy, 4, 64-69 [in Russian].
18.Shkarupa, E.A. (2007). Razvitie innovatsionnyh form finansovo-kreditnoi infrastruktury maloho ahrobiznesa [The development of innovative forms of finance and credit infrastructure of small agribusiness]. Vestnik VolHU. Seriia 10: Innovatsionnye tehnolohii – Bulletin of the VolSU. Series 10: Innovative Technology, 2, 85-92 [in Russian].
19.Agrawal, V., Ferguson, M., Toktay, L.B., & Thomas, V. (2012). Is Leasing Greener than Selling? Management Science, 58(3), 523-533 [in English].
20.Bhaskaran, S., & Gilbert, S. (2009). Implications of Channel Structure for Leasing or Selling Durable Goods. Marketing Sci., 28(5), 918-934 [in English].
21.Fraser, E. (2012). High tech farming, local food systems, food aid, or strict environmental regulation? How the American dust bowl can teach us to deal with drought, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy Working Paper No. 110. Sustainability Research Institute Paper No. 38
[in English].
