• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.65 número6

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.65 número6"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texto

(1)

REVISTA

BRASILEIRA

DE

ANESTESIOLOGIA

OfficialPublicationoftheBrazilianSocietyofAnesthesiology

www.sba.com.br

SCIENTIFIC

ARTICLE

Administration

of

paracetamol

versus

dipyrone

by

intravenous

patient-controlled

analgesia

for

postoperative

pain

relief

in

children

after

tonsillectomy

Mesut

Sener

a,∗

,

Aysu

Kocum

a

,

Esra

Caliskan

a

,

Ismail

Yilmaz

b

,

Fatma

Caylakli

b

,

Anis

Aribogan

a

aDepartmentofAnaesthesiologyandReanimation,BaskentUniversityFacultyofMedicine,Ankara,Turkey

bDepartmentofOtorhinolaryngology,BaskentUniversityFacultyofMedicine,Ankara,Turkey

Received8August2013;accepted23September2013 Availableonline29October2013

KEYWORDS

Analgesia;

Patient-controlled; Pediatric;

Pain;

Postoperative; Tonsillectomy

Abstract

Backgroundandobjective: Wecomparedtheefficacyofintravenous(IV)paracetamol versus

dipyroneviapatient-controlledanalgesia(PCA)forpostoperativepainreliefinchildren.

Methods:Thestudywascomposedof120childrenwhohadundergoneelectivetonsillectomy

afterreceivinggeneralanesthesia.Patientsweredividedinto3groupsaccordingtothedosage

ofpostoperativeintravenous-patient-controlledanalgesia:paracetamol,dipyrone,orplacebo.

Painwasevaluatedusinga0-to100-mmvisualanalogscaleand1- to4-painreliefscoreat

30min, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24h postoperatively. Pethidine(0.25mgkg−1)was administered

intravenously topatients requiring rescueanalgesia. Pethidinerequirementswere recorded

duringthefirst24hpostoperatively,andtreatmentrelatedadverseeffectswerenoted.

Results:Postoperativevisual analog scale scores were significantlylower with paracetamol

groupcomparedwithplacebogroupat6h(p<0.05),dipyronegroupcomparedwithplacebo

groupat30minand6h(p<0.05).Nosignificantdifferencesregardingvisualanalogscalevalues

at1,2,4,12,and24hwerefound.Nosignificantdifferenceswerefoundbetweengroupswith

respecttopainreliefscore(p>0.05).Postoperativepethidinerequirementsweresignificantly

lowerwithparacetamolanddipyronegroupscompared withplacebogroup(62.5%,68.4% vs

90%,p<0.05).Nosignificantdifferenceswerefoundbetweengroupswithrespecttonausea,

vomitingandtheanyotheradverseeffectsofthedrugs(p>0.05).

Conclusions:Paracetamolanddipyronehavewelltolerability profileandeffective analgesic

propertieswhenadministeredIV-PCAforpostoperativeanalgesiainchildrenaftertonsillectomy.

©2013SociedadeBrasileiradeAnestesiologia.PublishedbyElsevier EditoraLtda.Allrights

reserved.

Thispaperwaspresentedasaposteratthe45thCongressoftheTurkishAnesthesiologyandIntensiveCareSocietyonOctober26---30, 2011,Antalya,Turkey.Thepresentationalsoreportedinthepress‘‘TurkAnestReanDerDergisi2011;39(Suppl.1):p.106’’.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:[email protected](M.Sener).

(2)

PALAVRAS-CHAVE

Analgesia;

Controladapelo

paciente; Pediatria; Dor;

Pós-operatório; Tonsilectomia

Administrac¸ãodeparacetamolversusdipironaemanalgesiacontroladapelopaciente

porviaintravenosaparaalíviodadornopós-operatóriodecrianc¸asapós

tonsilectomia

Resumo

Justificativaeobjetivo: Comparamos a eficácia da administrac¸ão de paracetamol versus

dipironaemanalgesiacontroladapelopaciente(PCA)porviaintravenosa(IV)paraalívioda

dornoperíodopós-operatórioemcrianc¸as.

Métodos: Oestudofoi compostopor120crianc¸assubmetidasàtonsilectomia sobanestesia

geral.OspacientesforamdivididosemtrêsgruposdeacordocomadoseIVdeanalgesia

con-troladapelopacientenopós-operatório:paracetamol,dipironaouplacebo.Adorfoiavaliada

usandoumaescalavisualanalógicade0-100mmeescorede1-4paraalíviodadornostempos

de30minutos,1,2,4,6,12e24horasdepós-operatório.Petidina(0,25mgkg−1)foi

admin-istradaIVaospacientesqueprecisaramdeanalgesiaderesgate.Anecessidadedepetidinafoi

registradaduranteasprimeiras24hdepós-operatório,eosefeitosadversosrelacionadosao

tratamentoforamregistrados.

Resultados: Osescoresdaescalavisualanalógicanopós-operatórioforamsignificativamente

menoresnogrupoparacetamolemcomparac¸ãocomogrupoplaceboem6h(p<0,05),nogrupo

dipironaemcomparac¸ãocomogrupoplaceboem30mine6h(p<0,05).Nãohouvediferenc¸a

significativaemrelac¸ãoaosvaloresdaescalavisualanalógicanostemposavaliadosde1,2,4,

12e24horas.Nãohouvediferenc¸asignificativaentreosgruposquantoaoescoredealívioda

dor(p>0,05).Anecessidadedepetidinafoisignificativamentemenornosgruposparacetamol

edipironaemcomparac¸ãocomogrupoplacebo(62,5%,68,4%vs.90%,p<0,05).Nãohouve

diferenc¸a significativaentreos grupos em relac¸ão àincidênciade náusea, vômitoe outros

efeitosadversosdosmedicamentos(p>0,05).

Conclusões: Paracetamoledipironapossuemum perfildeboatolerabilidadeepropriedades

analgésicas eficazes quandoadministrados IV para ACP no pós-operatório de crianc¸as após

tonsilectomia.

©2013SociedadeBrasileira deAnestesiologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda.Todosos

direitosreservados.

Introduction

Tonsillectomy can be considered as the most widely

practicedoneamongthechildhoodsurgicaloperations.

Suf-ficienttreatmentofpostoperativepaininchildrenisamain

concernforpatients,parentsandclinicians.1However,

suc-cessfultreatment of postoperativepainin childrenis still difficultdespiteofrecent progressincontroltechniqueof painandanalgesics.Insufficientpostoperativepaincontrol can result in impairment of the feature of life, recov-eryof patientsandsocial stressfor boththechildren and the parents.1 Analgesics such as opioids and non-opioids

are frequently used for postoperative pain management. The severity of side effects related witheffective opioid dosage may restrict their usage for sufficient postopera-tive pain control. Intravenous (IV) non-opioid analgesics are used extensively for the treatment of postoperative pain. Non-opioid analgesics have been shown to effec-tively decrease postoperative pain, opioid consumption and thus their adverse effects during the postoperative periodinchildren.2 Thereareonlyafewalternative

anal-gesicagents forIVnon-opioidanalgesiafor thetreatment of postoperative pain in pediatric patient.2 Paracetamol

(acetaminophen)2---6 and dipyrone (metamizol)7---9 are two

frequently usedIVnon-opioid analgesics.10,11 Paracetamol

is the most popular,effective andmost widely used non-opioid analgesic for acute pain.11 Dipyrone has potent

pain-relieving, antipyretic, spasmolytic properties, and is

also an effective non-opioid analgesic for acute pain.11

Paracetamol and dipyrone generally show similar clinical efficacy.5,12 On theother hand,administrationof

paracet-amol resulted in a significant reductionin the number of patients requiring opioid analgesics to achieve adequate postoperativepainreliefwhencomparedwithdipyrone.13

IV-PCA is an effective method for the treatment of post-operative pain both in adults and children.2 IV-PCA is an

effectiveand safemethodproviding appropriatelevelsof analgesiainchildrenover5yearsofage.14,15Theliterature

reviewrevealsthatthereareafewstudiesconductedwith non-opioidanalgesicsbyIV-PCAfortreatmentof postopera-tivepaininonlyadults.16---21Althoughnon-opioidanalgesics

(paracetamolanddipyrone)arewidelyusedinthepediatric agegroup, surprisinglywe have notseen anyreport con-cerningnon-opioidanalgesic(paracetamolordipyrone)use viaIV-PCAforpostoperativepaintreatmentinchildren.

In our study,we aimed to test the hypothesis that IV-PCAwithparacetamolfor treatmentofpostoperativepain inchildrenaftertonsillectomyissuperiorandanacceptable alternativefordipyronebyIV-PCAintermsofanadequate postoperativepain relief and reduction in the number of patientsrequiringopioidanalgesics.

Methods

(3)

Writteninformedparentalconsentandverbalchildassent were obtained from 143 ASA I patients (according tothe AmericanSocietyofAnesthesiologistsPhysicalStatus Classi-ficationsystem;aged7---15years)whohadbeenscheduled for elective tonsillectomy. The study was a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled double-blind study. Patientswereinstructed howto usea PCA pump prior to surgeryandwereinformedabout thedatatobecollected postoperativelyusinga visual analog scale (VAS)and pain reliefscore (PRS).Exclusioncriteriaincluded ahistory of significant hepatic, pulmonary, renal, or cardiac disease; hypersensitivity to the study medications; any disorder contraindicating administration of non-opioid analgesics; pepticulcerdisease;asthma;ableedingdisorder; concomi-tant medication (anticonvulsants, corticosteroids, psycho tropics, or antihistamines); intolerance to non-opioids. Those unable to understand the instructions regarding the use of PCA were not included in the study. Patients were not allowed to receive any analgesics 24h prior to the operation. Patients were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 study groups, according to a pre-generated randomiza-tionscheme created by the web site Randomization.com

(http://www.randomization.com), to receive IV-PCA

treatment with paracetamol, dipyrone, or placebo (0.9% NaCl).

Theanalgesicsolution(500mL0.9%NaCl)wasprepared by one of the researchers (AK) blinded to the treatment protocol andnot involved in the intraoperative and post-operative patient treatment. Patients were blind to the treatment. Postoperative data were collected by another anesthesiologist(EC)blindedastowhichanalgesicwasused. The solutions contained either 2mgmL−1 paracetamol, 2mgmL−1 dipyrone, or 1mL normal saline. No premedi-cation wasgiven tothe children. General anesthesia was inducedwiththiopental(5---7mgkg−1),fentanyl(1

␮gkg−1),

and vecuronium (0.1mgkg−1). After tracheal intubation, mechanicalventilationwasinitiated,anda50%mixtureof N2O/O2wasadministeredthroughoutthesurgery. Anesthe-siawasmaintainedwithisoflurane1.2MAC.Residualmuscle relaxationwasreversed withneostigmineand atropineat the end of the operation. All patients were extubated in theoperatingroom.Patients wereassignedtoone ofthe following 3 groups with respect to the analgesic agent administeredviaIV-PCA(AbbottPainManagementProvider, AbbottLaboratories,AbbottPark,Ill,USA)intherecovery room:

Paracetamol:Loadingdoseof4.5mgkg−1IV,followedby 0.5mgkg−1h−1 basalinfusion,1mgkg−1bolusdose, lock-out time30min for 24h (totaldose of paracetamol was limitedto10mgkg−14h−1).

Dipyrone: Loading dose of 4.5mgkg−1 IV, followed by 0.5mgkg−1h−1 basalinfusion,1mgkg−1bolusdose, lock-outtime30minfor24h(totaldoseofdipyronewaslimited to10mgkg−14h−1).

Placebo: Loading dose of 2mLkg−1 IV, followed by 0.5mLkg−1h−1 basalinfusion,1mLkg−1bolusdose, lock-outtime30min.

Postoperativepainintensitywasevaluatedbythepatient accordingtoa0-to100-mmhorizontalVASat30min,1,2,4, 6,12,and24hpostoperatively.PRS(PainReliefScore)was

evaluatedbythepatientaccordingtoa0=none,1=little, 2=some,3=alot,and4=completereliefat30min,1,2,4, 6,12,and24hpostoperatively.Pethidine(0.25mgkg−1)was given IVtopatients whose VASscore was≥40mm and/or PRS was <2 and then recorded (total dose of pethidine waslimitedto1.5mgkg−16h−1).Adverse effectsincluding nausea,vomiting,bleedingatthesurgicalfield,dyspepsia, allergicreactions,anduseofantiemeticmedication (meto-clopramide HCl) also were recorded during the first 24h postoperatively.

Apoweranalysiswasperformedbasedonthetotal pethi-dinerequirement dataobtainedfromthefirst15 patients in the placebo group. The results of the first 15 patients in the placebo group showed that mean total pethidine requirement was 0.81±0.39mgkg−1 during the first 24h postoperatively.Ifwealsoassumedatwo-tailedtypeIerror of0.05andapower of0.80,approximately40patients in each groupwererequiredin ordertodetecta 30% reduc-tioninthedoseoftotalpethidinerequirementbetweenthe groups.Analysiswasperformed byPowerandPrecisionV4 TM (version 4.1.0,Biostat Inc.,Englewood, NJ) statistical program.

AllstatisticalcalculationswereperformedusingSPSSfor Windows software (Statistical Package for the Social Sci-ences,version11.0,SSPSInc,Chicago,IL,USA).Differences between the 3 groups were analyzed using an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test or its nonparametric counterpart, the Kruskal---Wallis test. Post hoc analysis was performed using the Bonferroni test. Homogeneity of variances was calculatedusingLevene’stestandLillieforssignificance cor-rection. Chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests were used to analyzecategorical variableswhereappropriate.Dataare expressedasmeans±SD.Differenceswereconsidered sta-tisticallysignificantatlevelsofp<0.05.

Results

(4)

Enrollment

Allocation

Follow-Up

Analysis Assessed for eligibility (n=143)

Excluded (n=23)

♦ Not meeting inclusion criteria (n=8) ♦ Declined to participate (n=9) ♦ Other reasons (n=6)

♦ Did not receive placebo (n=0) ♦ Received placebo (n=40) Placebo(n=40)

Discontinued dipyrone (n=0) Lost to follow-up (n=0)

Discontinued placebo (n=0) Lost to follow-up (n=0)

Discontinued paracetamol (n=0) Lost to follow-up (n=0)

Analysed (n=0) Analysed (n=0) Analysed (n=0) ♦ Did not receive dipyrone (n=0)

♦ Received dipyrone (n=40) Dipyrone (n=40)

Paracetamol (n=40)

♦ Received paracetamol (n=40)

♦ Did not receive paracetamol (n=0)

♦ Excluded from analysis (n=0) ♦ Excluded from analysis (n=0) ♦ Excluded from analysis (n=0) Randomized (n=120)

Figure1 Enrolmentprocess.

Table1 Demographicandbaselineclinicalcharacteristicsofthepatients.

Paracetamol(n=40) Dipyrone(n=40) Placebo(n=40)

Age(year) 9.4±2.2 8.8±2.2 9.2±2.3

Weight(kg) 33.2±12.9 30.6±11.1 32.2±12.3

Sex(male/female,n) 20/20 20/19 23/17

Durationofsurgery(min) 39.1±15.4 43.0±13.0 37.3±13.9

Valuesaremeans±SDornumbersofpatients,asappropriate.

Table2 Meanpainscores(VAS)foreachoftheindicatedtimes.

Paracetamol(n=40) Dipyrone(n=40) Placebo(n=40) p

VAS30min. 40.4±30.6 39.8±31.9a 56.6±27.2a 0.044a

VAS1h 16.8±18.8 21.8±11.1 24.1±25.5 0.340

VAS2h 16.4±15.0 28.1±26.2 23.5±25.3 0.173

VAS4h 18.3±15.9 26.1±28.5 26.1±25.3 0.645

VAS6h 17.5±15.8b 20.9±22.4a 30.1±23.3a,b 0.045a/0.013b

VAS12h 19.6±18.1 16.1±15.4 24.5±24.9 0.549

VAS24h 11.9±11.7 11.2±8.9 19.4±19.1 0.244

Dataaremean±SD.VAS,visualanalogscale(VASvaluesobtainedfromeachgroupwerecomparedwiththeothertreatmentsateach timepointusingananalysisofvariance).

(5)

4

3

2

1

0

30.min 1.h 2.h 4.h 6.h 12.h

P

ain relief score

Paracetamol Dipyrone Placebo

Figure2 Painreliefscoresofthepatientsinthegroupsduring postoperative24h.

The requirement for postoperative cumulative amounts of rescue analgesics for the paracet-amol (0.38±0.38mgkg−124h−1) and dipyrone (0.39±0.41mgkg−124h−1) groups was significantly lower thanthoseoftheplacebogroup(0.65±0.46mgkg−124h−1) (paracetamol vs plasebo, p=0.013; dipyrone vs placebo,

p=0.023, Fig. 3). Fifteen patients (37.5%) in the para-cetamol, 13 patients (32.5%) in the dipyrone, and 4 patients(10%)intheplacebogroupdidnotrequirerescue analgesics during the 24h after surgery. The amount of rescueanalgesicsfortheparacetamolanddipyronegroups was significantly lower than those of the placebo group (paracetamol vs plasebo, p=0.004; dipyrone vs placebo,

p=0.014,Fig.4).

Themostfrequentadverseeffectswerenausea(15.8%) and vomiting (29.2%) during the first 24h after surgery. Nosignificantdifferenceswerefoundbetweengroupswith respect to nausea, vomiting and antiemetic medication

0.9 1

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0

30.min 1.h 2.h 4.h 6.h 12.h 24.h

Placebo Dipyrone Paracetamol

P

ethidine (mg/kg) *

*

£

€ €

Figure3 Totalopioidrequirementsofthepatientinthegroup during postoperative 24h. Values obtained from each group werecomparedwiththeothertreatmentsateachtimepointvia analysisofvariance.*P<0.05paracetamolanddipyroneversus placebo.£P<0.05dipyroneversusplacebo;DP<0.05

paraceta-molversusplacebo.

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Paracetamol Dipyrone

Numbers of the resuce opioid analgesics

needed patients

Placebo

Dipyrone Placebo Paracetamol

Figure4 Rescue analgesicsrequirementsofthepatientsin thegroupsduringpostoperative24h.

(p>0.05,Fig.5).Adverseeffectsincludingpersistent nau-seaandvomiting,bleedingatthesurgicalfield,dyspepsia, and allergic reactions were not recorded during the first 24h postoperatively. With respect to adverse effects, no significantdifferencewasfound amongthegroups studied (p>0.05).

40

30

20

10

0

Paracetamol Dipyrone Placebo

Nausea

Vomiting

Antiemetic

Numbers of patients (n)

(6)

Discussion

Ourstudyrevealedthattheadministrationofparacetamol anddipyronebyIV-PCAforthetreatmentofacute postop-erativepainresultedinawell tolerabilityandhadsimilar effective analgesic properties in children after tonsillec-tomy.The rescue opioidanalgesic requirementduring the first24haftersurgerywassignificantlylowerinthe paracet-amolanddipyronegroupswhencomparedwiththeplacebo group.

IV-PCA is an effective method used for the treatment of postoperative pain in adults and children, while regu-lating the dose according toindividualneeds, anditsuse hasexpandedtoevenyoungchildren.2,14,15 Insomeof the

studies,18---21 dipyrone was successfully used in adults by

IV-PCA for postoperative pain management. Although, IV paracetamolanddipyronearewidely usedinchildren,we havenotencounteredanyreportconcerningparacetamolor dipyroneusebyIV-PCAforpostoperativepaintreatmentfor thisgroupofage.Ourstudyisthefirstprospective, random-ized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to compare IV-PCA with paracetamol and dipyrone for postoperative painmanagementinchildren.Furtherstudiesmaybe warr-antedwith variousdoses of paracetamol and dipyroneto definetheoptimumIV-PCAregimenforpostoperativepain managementinchildren.

Why do practitioners administer IV non-opioids inter-mittently by bolus injection with hand-held injector for acutepostoperativepaintreatmentinpatientsthatalready receives intra-operatively non-opioids intravenously and then continued every 6h for 24h? Markedly high andlow levelsofanalgesicdrugsmayresultassuboptimal manage-mentof postoperativepainwiththeintermittentIVbolus technique. We think that IV non-opioid analgesics should be administered by IV-PCA for acute postoperative pain treatmentwhenappropriate.Non-opioidanalgesics admin-isteredvia IV-PCA shouldhave well tolerability properties and low incidences of adverse effects. Paracetamol is a safe and well tolerated drug with minor adverse effects andprovenefficacywhenusedperioperatively.22---24IV

para-cetamolhassignificantlyincreasedtheuseofperioperative analgesic.22---24 IVformofparacetamolseemstoresultina

betteranalgesiceffectwhencomparedwithotherforms.6

Dipyrone is a widely used effective analgesic with low adverseeffects.2Inourstudy,adverseeffectsincluding

per-sistentnauseaandvomiting,bleedingatthesurgicalfield, dyspepsia,andallergicreactionswerenotencountered dur-ing the first 24h postoperatively. In addition tothis, the incidenceofnausea,vomitingandtheneedforantiemetic medicationweresimilarinstudydrugsandplacebogroups. Inourstudy,wearesurprisedthatthereisnodifferencein theincidenceofsideeffectsintheplacebo,paracetamol, anddipyronegroups.Sincetheplacebogroupconsumed sig-nificantlymorepethidinethantheothergroups.Wewould haveexpectedalowerincidenceofnauseaandvomitingin thetwoPCAgroupssincetheyconsumedlesspethidine.We thinkthattheincidenceofpostoperativenauseaand vomi-ting(PONV)isnotonlyrelatedtostudymedicationbutitis alsorelatedtothetypeofsurgery astonsillectomy. Para-cetamolanddipyronearerelatively well toleratedagents whencomparedwiththeother non-opioidanalgesicswith respecttopotentialsideeffects.25,26Wedidnotencounter

any complication related with paracetamol and dipyrone withoutPONV.IVdipyroneandparacetamolarecommonly usednon-opioidanalgesicsastheprimaryanalgesicor adju-vanttoopioidanalgesiaforpostoperativepainmanagement inchildhoodinourcountry.

IVparacetamolandtramadolhavesimilaranalgesic prop-ertiesafteradenotonsillectomyinchildren.3 Dipyroneand

tramadol can be considered as alternative analgesics for treatmentofpostoperativepainwhenadministeredby IV-PCA.20 IV dipyrone has been revealed to be an effective

analgesic6,18---21,27 andhas equivalentefficacytothat of IV

paracetamolfor postoperativepaintreatment5,12 Korkmaz

Dilmenetal.28demonstratedthatIVparacetamoland

dipy-roneprovideeffective analgesiaafterlumbardisksurgery whenadministratedasrescue analgesic withmorphineby PCA.On the other hand,Grundmann etal.25 showedthat

dipyroneis superior to paracetamol for acute postopera-tivepaintreatment.However,theirpostoperativefollowup periodwaslimitedto2handwasrelativelyshortwhen com-paredwithourstudy.Inourstudy,painscoresinparacetamol anddipyronegroupswerelowandsimilaroverthecourseof theassessmentperiodandthedifferencebetweenthetwo groups with respect torescue analgesic requirement was notsignificant. Ourresults suggest that administrationof paracetamolanddipyronebyIV-PCAarebotheffectiveand havesimilaranalgesicpropertiesforthetreatmentofacute postoperativepainfollowingtonsillectomyinchildren.

PONV are frequent postoperative problems following general anesthesia especially after tonsillectomy. Use of opioid analgesic is an important factor in increasing risk ofPONV.Therisk ofPONVdependsonmanyotherfactors suchasthe patient,technique of theanesthesia, typeof surgery,andmedicationsadministered.29Inadditiontothis,

swallowedbloodandoropharyngealirritationinduce vomi-ting after tonsillectomy in children.30 Adenotonsillectomy

hasthehighest rateof PONV (54%)amongthe most com-monlyperformed operationsin children.31 Brodner etal.5

demonstratedthat episodesof nausea andvomiting were notsignificantintheparacetamolanddipyronegroupwhen comparedwithplacebogroupafterminortointermediate surgery.Theyshowthattheincidenceofsideeffectswasnot significantamongthegroups;therangeofrelative frequen-ciesfornauseawasbetween30.6%and42.9%andtherange ofrelativefrequenciesforvomitingwasbetween18.4%and 24.5%.8Uysaletal.3 showedthatthefrequencyof nausea

andvomitingare22%and19%respectivelyinIV paraceta-molgroupafteradenotonsillectomyinchildren.Inourstudy, nauseadevelopedin15.8%patientsandvomitingin29.2%, butthoseweretheonlyadverseeffectsexperiencedbyour patients.Our results revealed findings similartothose of previousstudies,andwe thinkthattheincidenceofPONV isnotonlyrelatedtostudymedicationbutitisalsorelated tothetypeofsurgery.

Inconclusion,bothparacetamolanddipyronehavegood tolerabilityprofileandhaveeffective analgesicproperties when administered by IV-PCA for postoperative analgesia aftertonsillectomyinchildren.

Funding

(7)

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

References

1.WalkerSM.Paininchildren:recentadvancesandongoing chal-lenges.BrJAnaesth.2008;101:101---10.

2.VergheseST,HannallahRS.Acutepainmanagementinchildren. JPainRes.2010;15:105---23.

3.UysalHY,TakmazSA,YamanF,etal.Theefficacyofintravenous paracetamolversustramadolforpostoperativeanalgesiaafter adenotonsillectomyinchildren.JClinAnesth.2011;23:53---7. 4.MalaiseO,BruyereO,ReginsterJY.Intravenousparacetamol:a

reviewofefficacyandsafetyintherapeuticuse.FutureNeurol. 2007;2:673---88.

5.BrodnerG, GogartenW,VanAkenH,et al.Efficacyof intra-venousparacetamolcomparedtodipyroneandparecoxib for postoperative pain management after minor-to-intermediate surgery:arandomised,double-blindtrial.EurJAnaesthesiol. 2011;28:125---32.

6.HennebergSW,NilsonLB.Acutepaediatricpain.Current Anaes-thesia&CriticalCare.2007;18:126---34.

7.Pe˜nuelas-Acu˜naJ,Oriol-LópezSA,Hernández-BernalCE,etal. Ketorolacvsmetamizolpreemptiveanalgesiainchildren.Cir Cir.2003;71:50---4.

8.SittlR,GriessingerN,KoppertW,etal.Managementof postop-erativepaininchildren.Schmerz.2000;14:333---9.

9.Levy M, Zylber-Katz E, Rosenkranz B. Clinical pharmacoki-netics of dipyrone and its metabolites. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995;28:216---34.

10.MessererB,GutmannA,WeinbergA,etal.Implementtationof a standardizedpainmanagement inapediatricsurgery unit. PediatrSurgInt.2010;26:879---89.

11.SchugSA, Manopas A. Updateon theroleof non-opioidsfor postoperativepaintreatment.BestPractResClinAnaesthesiol. 2007;21:15---30.

12.Kampe S, Warm M, Landwehr S, et al. Clinical equivalence ofIVparacetamolcomparedtoIVdipyronefor postoperative analgesiaaftersurgeryforbreastcancer.CurrMedResOpin. 2006;22:1949---54.

13.Ohnesorge H, Bein B, Hanss R, et al. Paracetamol versus metamizolinthetreatmentofpostoperativepainafterbreast surgery: a randomized, controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:648---53.

14.Morton NS,O’Brien K.Analgesicefficacyofparacetamol and diclofenacinchildrenreceivingPCAmorphine.Br JAnaesth. 1999;82:715---7.

15.LawrieSC,ForbesDW,AkhtarTM,etal.Patient-controlled anal-gesiainchildren.Anaesthesia.1990;45:1074---6.

16.Karaca M, Kocoglu H, Gocmen A. Comparison of lornoxicam withtramadolinpatient-controlledanalgesiaafter gynecolog-icalsurgery.EurJGynaecolOncol.2006;27:78---80.

17.RodriguezMJ,DelatorreMR,PereziraolaP,etal.Comparative studyoftramadolversusNSAIDSasintravenousinfusionfor man-agingpostoperativepain.CurrTherRes.1993;54:375---83. 18.SenerM,YilmazerC,YilmazI,etal.Patient-controlled

anal-gesia with lornoxicam vs. dipyrone for acute postoperative painreliefafterseptorhinoplasty:aprospective,randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008;25:177---82.

19.TorresLM,RodriguezMJ,MonteroA,etal.Efficacyandsafety ofdipyroneversustramadolinthemanagementofpainafter hysterectomy:arandomized,double-blind,multicenterstudy. RegAnesthPainMed.2001;26:118---24.

20.StamerUM,HothkerF,LehnenK,etal.Postoperativeanalgesia withtramadolandmetamizol.Continualinfusionversuspatient controlledanalgesia.Anaesthesist.2003;52:33---41.

21.TorresLM,ColladoF,Almarcha JM,etal.Treatmentof post-operativepainwithintravenousPCAsystem.Comparisonwith morphine,metamizole,andbuprenorphine.RevEspAnestesiol Reanim.1993;40:181---4.

22.RoseM.Systemicanalgesicsforchildren.AnaesthesiaIntensive CareMed.2007;8:184---8.

23.OscierCD,MilnerQJW.Peri-operativeuseofparacetamol. Anes-thesia.2009;64:65---72.

24.KehletH,Werner MU.Roleofparacetamolintheacutepain management.Drugs.2003;63:15---22(Specno2).

25.GrundmannU,WörnleC,BiedlerA,etal.Theefficacyofthe non-opioidanalgesicsparecoxib,paracetamol andmetamizol for postoperative pain relief after lumbar microdiscectomy. AnesthAnalg.2006;103:217---22.

26.Andrade SE, Martinez C, Walker AM. Comparative safety evaluation of non-narcotic analgesics. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1357---65.

27.SenerM,YilmazerC,YilmazI,etal.Efficacyoflornoxicamfor acutepostoperativepainrelief afterseptoplasty: a compari-sonwithdiclofenac,ketoprofenanddipyrone.JClinAnesth. 2008;20:103---8.

28.KorkmazDilmenO,TunaliY,CakmakkayaOS,etal.Efficacyof intravenousparacetamol,metamizolandlornoxicamon post-operativepain and morphine consumptionafter lumbardisc surgery.EurJAnaesthesiol.2010;27:428---32.

29.Watcha MF, White PF. Postoperative nausea and vomi-ting.Itsetiology,treatment,andprevention. Anesthesiology. 1992;77:162---84.

30.PanareseA,ClarkeRW,YardleyMP.Earlypost-operative mor-bidityfollowingtonsillectomyinchildren:implicationsforday surgery.JLaryngolOtol.1999;113:1089---91.

Imagem

Table 2 Mean pain scores (VAS) for each of the indicated times.
Figure 2 Pain relief scores of the patients in the groups during postoperative 24 h.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Com base nessas questões, torna-se importante o estudo da relação dessa prática de trabalho com o ato de dormir dos trabalhadores, e portanto, o presente estudo tem por

Para pacientes sob anestesia venosa total, uma vez que cons- titui fator de risco para despertar intraoperatório, o uso da monitorac ¸ão da atividade elétrica cerebral é

Bispectral index monitoring prevent awareness during total intravenous anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, multi-center controlled trial. Bispectral index

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of remifentanil associated with propofol in the incidence of propofol injection pain and, concomitantly, the influence of

A significant difference was observed between mortality rates in this study and those reported for the Bosnia and Lebanon civil wars; and the difference became extremely prominent

Iliohypogas- tric/ilioinguinal nerve block in inguinal hernia repair for postoperative pain management: comparison of the anatomical landmark and ultrasound guided techniques. Rev

In particular, our results suggest that proteasome activity is also required for both the breaking of dormancy by ethylene and the progression of seed germination

In particular, our results suggest that proteasome activity is also required for both the breaking of dormancy by ethylene and the progression of seed germination