• Nenhum resultado encontrado

J. Braz. Chem. Soc. vol.24 número2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "J. Braz. Chem. Soc. vol.24 número2"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texto

Imagem

Table 1 shows the range chosen for each factor. The  concentration ranges of PHBV and safrole oxide in DCM  were 30-40 and 4.0-5.0 mg mL –1  at room temperature,  respectively.
Figure 1. Scheme illustrating the apparatus used in the precipitations of  SO and PHBV: pressure (P), temperature (T), flow (Q), heat exchanger  (HE) and automatic back pressure regulator (ABPR).
Figure 2a shows a ternary system under pressure of  8.0 MPa at 40 °C with 0.75 mass fraction of CO 2  (wCO 2 )
Figure 3 shows the three-dimensional graphs of the  combined effect of pressure and Q CO2  in higher I C  values
+4

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The n -butanol fraction of the fruits extract (EFR-Bu) was subjected to chromatographic fractionation on a reversed phase column, which resulted in the isolation and identification

In this work, our group used theoretical tools for the study of the luminescent properties of the conjugate Microcystin-LR-europium cryptate aiming to understand details involved

The determination of the aggregation numbers of SLES micelles over a wide concentration range of detergent and added NaCl by the time-resolved fluorescence quenching method 7,10-12

The measurements were the concentrations of the different parameters in each section of the two sediment cores (9 sections for each core), and the variables were the

other competing IRMPD processes are observed; ( ii ) The sequential dissociation results in the progressive hydrolysis of the ethoxy groups attached to the silicon center and

In this way, this work reports a simple method to produce a hybrid antimicrobial material based on LDH and biogenic silver nanoparticles that present a high antibacterial activity

the particle did not lift-off after reaching the maximum voltage... Distribution of electric fields causing lifting for soda-lime glass particles. Grey bars refer to negative

Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffraction patterns of the samples prepared from refluxing (R1) and sonochemical (S1) methods. All the diffraction peaks in the X-ray diffraction