String
networks
with
junctions
in
competition
models
P.P. Avelino
a,
b,
D. Bazeia
c,
L. Losano
c,
J. Menezes
a,
d,
e,
∗
,
B.F. de Oliveira
f aCentrodeAstrofísicadaUniversidadedoPorto,RuadasEstrelas,4150-762Porto,PortugalbDepartamentodeFísicaeAstronomia,FaculdadedeCiências,UniversidadedoPorto,RuadoCampoAlegre687,4169-007Porto,Portugal cDepartamentodeFísica,UniversidadeFederaldaParaíba,58051-970JoãoPessoa,PB,Brazil
dInstituteforBiodiversityandEcosystemDynamics,UniversityofAmsterdam,SciencePark904,1098XHAmsterdam,TheNetherlands eEscoladeCiênciaseTecnologia,UniversidadeFederaldoRioGrandedoNorte,CaixaPostal1524,59072-970Natal,RN,Brazil fDepartamentodeFísica,UniversidadeEstadualdeMaringá,Av.Colombo,5790,87020-900Maringá,PR,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Articlehistory:
Received13November2016
Receivedinrevisedform18January2017 Accepted26January2017
Availableonline30January2017 CommunicatedbyC.R.Doering Keywords:
Populationdynamics Stringnetworks
Inthisworkwegivespecificexamplesofcompetitionmodels,withsixandeightspecies,whose three-dimensionaldynamicsnaturallyleadstotheformationofstringnetworkswithjunctions,associatedwith regions that have ahigh concentration ofenemy species. We study the two- andthree-dimensional evolution of suchnetworks, bothusing stochastic network and mean field theorysimulations. If the predation, reproduction and mobility probabilities do not vary in spaceand time, we findthat the networksattainscalingregimeswithacharacteristiclengthroughlyproportionaltot1/2,wheret isthe
physicaltime,thusshowingthatthepresenceofjunctions,onitsown,doesnothaveasignificantimpact ontheirscalingproperties.
©2017ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
1. Introduction
Competitionmodelsarewidelyregardedasacrucialtoolto un-derstandthemechanismsleadingtobiodiversity
[1–4]
(seealso[5,
6] fora review). Althoughthe simplestcompetition models usu-ally consider three species and allow for an equal number of basic microscopic actions (motion, reproduction and predation), many interesting generalizations, including further species and more complexinteraction rules, have beenconsidered in the lit-erature[7–31]
.In [14,15], a broad family of spatial stochastic May–Leonard modelswithanarbitrarynumberofspecieshasbeenintroduced. There,manyinterestingfeaturesofthisfamilyofmodels,including thedynamicsofcomplexnetworksofspirallingpatternsand inter-faces,havebeeninvestigatedindetail.Recently,in
[25]
,ithasbeen shownthatspecificsub-classesofthisfamilyofmodelsmaylead to theemergence ofstring networksinthree spatial dimensions. These strings are associated to predator-prey interactions which occurmainlyalonglinescorrespondingtoahighconcentration of enemy species. Thestrings studied in[25]
do not havejunctions andtheirdynamicshasbeenshowntobecurvaturedriven.In this paper we consider the emergence of string networks withjunctionsinthecontextofspecificspatialstochastic
competi-*
Correspondingauthor.E-mailaddress:[email protected](J. Menezes).
tionmodelsbelongingtothegeneralfamilyintroducedin
[14,15]
. Weinvestigatethetwo- andthree-dimensionaldynamicsofthese modelsusingbothstochasticandmeanfieldnetworksimulations. The outline of this paperis asfollows. In Sec. 2 we introduce a sub-class of stochastic May–Leonardmodels allowing forthe for-mation ofstring networkswithjunctions inthreespatial dimen-sions.InSec.3weinvestigatethestochasticevolutionoftwo- and three-dimensionalnetworksinmodelsbelongingtotheabove sub-classwithN=
6 orN=
8 species.InSec.4westudythedynamics of suchsystems usingmeanfield theory simulations,considering alsotheparticularcaseofthecollapseofacircularloop.InSec.5we constrainthe scaling parameter
λ
governingthe macroscopic dynamicsofthesemodels,consideringvariouschoicesforthe mo-bility,predationandreproductionparameters.Finally,weconclude inSec.6.2. Familyofmodels
Here, we consider a sub-class of the more general family of spatialstochasticMay–LeonardmodelsintroducedinRefs.[14,15]. We investigate models with an even number of species N
>
4, whereeachspeciescompeteswithN−
4 other species.The com-petition diagrams for the simplestcases with N=
6 and N=
8 species are illustrated in the left and right panels of Fig. 1, re-spectively.Thedoublearrowsindicatethatthepredationbetween competingspecies isbi-directional. Exceptforthelabeling of the differentspecies,thediagramsdepictedinFig. 1
areinvariantun-http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2017.01.038 0375-9601/©2017ElsevierB.V.Allrightsreserved.
Fig. 1. Diagramsdescribingthepossiblepredator-preyinteractionsinthemodels withN=6 (leftpanel)andN=8 (rightpanel)differentspecies.(Forinterpretation ofthecolorsinthisfigure,thereaderisreferredtothewebversionofthisarticle.) derrotationsby
θ
n=
2π
(
n/
N)
,withn=
0,
±
1,
±
2,
. . . ,
±(
N−
1)
, indicatingthepresenceofa ZN symmetry.InthesemodelsindividualsofN speciesareinitiallydistributed onsquareorcubic latticeswith
N
sites.Thedifferentspeciesare labeled by i=
1,
. . . ,
N, and the cyclic identification i=
i+
kN,wherek isaninteger,ismade.Thesumofthenumberof individ-uals ofthe speciesi (Ii) with thenumber ofempty sites (IE) is equaltothetotalnumberofsites(
N
),thatisN
i=1
Ii
+
IE=
N
.
(1)At each time step a random individual (active) is chosen to interactwithone ofits nearest neighbors (passive), alsoselected randomly.Thenumberofneighbors isequaltofour,inthecaseof thetwo-dimensional squarelattice, andtosix, inthe caseofthe three-dimensionalcubiclattice.Theunitoftime
t
=
1 isdefined asthetimenecessaryforN
interactionstooccur(onegeneration). Thepossibleinteractions areclassifiedasMotion i→
i,
Re-productioni⊗
→
ii,
orPredationi(
i±
α
)
→
i⊗
,
wheremay beanyspecies(i)oran emptysite(⊗
)andα
=
1,
. . . ,
(
N−
4)/
2. A constant predation probability p between competing species, and constant reproduction and mobility probabilities (r and m,respectively),commonto all species, isconsidered. Althoughthis classofmodelsisdefinedfora genericeven N
>
4,inthispaper weshallinvestigateexplicitlythemodelsillustratedinFig. 1
,withN
=
6 and N=
8 differentspecies.Throughout this letter, we consider three different parameter sets,characterized byadominationofmotion[set M:(m, p,r)
=
(0.8,0.1,0.1)],predation[setP :(m,p,r)
=
(0.1,0.8,0.1)]or repro-duction[set R:(m,p,r)=
(0.1,0.1,0.8)]interactions.3. Stochasticnetworksimulations
Weperformedaseriesofstochasticnetworksimulationsofthe models with six and eight species in two and three spatial di-mensions(insquareandcubiclattices,respectively).Thenumerical resultsshow that,assoon asthesimulations start,individualsof thesame species, originally distributed randomly throughoutthe lattice,sharecommonspatial regions.The individualstendnot to be close to competitors, butin the vicinity ofindividuals of the samespeciesorofotherneutralspecies.
Intwo spatial dimensionssuchspatial configurations promote the coexistenceof species whichmay be organized either clock-wise orcounterclockwise,around roughly circular regions witha significantly higher density of empty sites. Attacks and counter-attacksbetweencompeting specieson opposite sidesof the bat-tle cores ensure the stability of such spatial patterns. Similar two-dimensionalarrangementsofthe specieshavebeenfoundin
Fig. 2. Illustrationofadefect/anti-defectpairwithfourspeciesinamodelwithan arbitrarynumberofspeciesN,wherei=1,...,N
2.
Ref. [25].These can be described as defect/anti-defect configura-tions associated to clockwise/counterclockwise vortex states, re-spectively. The average area of the defect and anti-defect cores dependsontheinteractionprobabilities(m,p,r),butitisroughly constantintime.
In contrast with the model described in Ref. [25], where ev-ery species would compete with N
−
3 distinct ones, here each specieshaslesscompetitors (eachspecieshas N−
4 competitors andthreeneutralspecies).Asa consequence,thenumberof con-figurationswhichpromotecoexistenceamongspeciesisenlarged. Infact,whileinRef.[25]allN specieshavetobegatheredaround the defectcores inorderto guarantee their stability,here, a sta-ble defect configuration requires only four species. Defects/anti-defectsarisewhenthedifferentspeciesdisposethemselvesinthe clockwise/counterclockwise vortex configurations shownin Fig. 2{
i,
i+
N2,
i+
1,
i−
N2−2}
,wherei=
1,
...,
N2 (notethateachspeciesi does not interact with the species i
±
N2−2 and i+
N2). These configurationsaccount for N2 differentkindsofdefect/anti-defects withfourspecies.Consider the competing species i and i
+
1 belonging to the defect/anti-defectconfigurationshowninFig. 2
.Theaverage num-ber ofattacks perunit timefromindividualsoftheouter speciesi
+
1 supersedesthosefromindividualsoftheinnerspeciesi.This implies that individuals of the outer species tend to invade the territoryof theinner onescausingan approximation and annihi-lation of the defect/anti-defect pair. We shall show that the de-fect/anti-defectcoresattracteachother,havingavelocitywhichis, on average,inverselyproportional to thedistance betweenthem. Incontrast,apairofclockwise(orcounterclockwise)defects (anti-defects)cannotannihilateandrepeleachother.Moreover, defect/anti-defectconfigurationswitha larger num-ber ofspeciesmayarise. Infact, defect/anti-defectconfigurations withn
=
4,
...,
N2+2 species, inwhicheach speciescompeteswithn
−
3 otherspecies, mayappearinmodels withaneven numberN
>
6 ofspecies.3.1. 6species
Let usfocus on the simplest casewith N
=
6. The left panel ofFig. 3
showsonesnapshottakenfromatwo-dimensional10242 stochastic networksimulationof themodelwithperiodic bound-aryconditionsfortheparametersetP .Each grid point is at mostoccupied by one individual which belongstothespeciesindicatedby thesamecolorasin
Fig. 1
.In addition,emptyspacesarerepresentedbywhitedots.The spatial patterns show that all defects involvefour differ-ent species. Mostof the predator-prey interactions take place at the defect core, which is surrounded by two pairs of compet-ing domains, each domain being dominated by a single species. Morespecifically,one mayidentifythreetypesof defects-anti/de-fectswheredomainsdominatedbythespecies
{
i,
i−
1,
i+
1,
i−
2}
(wherei=
1,
2,
3)arrangethemselvesinthisorder(orthereverse) around thedefect(anti-defect) cores.Dueto theperiodic bound-aryconditions,thenumberofdefectsin eachsimulationis equalworksimulationswithperiodicboundaryconditionsofthe N
=
6 model.We notice that the extension to threespatial dimensions of the dynamics presentedin the left panel of Fig. 3 gives rises toa string networkwithY-type junctions.Such strings represent regionswithasignificant largernumberdensityofempty spaces, whichappearasaconsequenceofthefrequentpredation interac-tionbetweencompetingspeciestakingplaceattheircore.The snapshot shown in the left panel of Fig. 4 represents a 643 regionoftheentire2563 three-dimensional network(the re-sultsshownwere generatedbyassumingtheparameter set P ).It presentsthecontourplotsassociatedtoafixedvalueofthedensity ofempty sites, whichhighlight thepresence of a stringnetwork
Fig. 3. Snapshotsobtainedfromtwo-dimensional10242stochasticnetwork
simula-tionsoftheN=6 (leftpanel)andN=8 (rightpanel)models.Thecolorscheme usedhereisthesameasrepresentedinFig. 1fori=1.Theresultswereobtained byassumingtheparametersetP .(Forinterpretationofthecolorsinthisfigure,the readerisreferredtothewebversionofthisarticle.)
Fig. 4. Snapshotstakenfromathree-dimensional643 regionofa2563 stochastic
networksimulationoftheN=6 model(leftpanel)andN=8 (rightpanel)models fortheparametersetP .
ofastringloop iscurvaturedriven anditisassociatedtothe ex-istence of a defect/anti-defect pair on anyplane intersecting the loop.TheloopcollapsewillbefurtherconsideredinSec.4.3.
Sinceanyplanardefectoranti-defectinvolvesonlyfourspecies, eachspeciesjoinstwodifferentstringsinthreespatialdimensions. ThisisresponsiblefortheappearanceofY-typejunctions,defined asthemeetingpointofthreedifferentstrings.Thestabilityofthe junctionsisensuredbypredator-preyinteractions,giventhateach specieshascompetitorsintwodifferentstrings.
Theupperpanelof
Fig. 5
illustratesthedifferentpossible con-figurations of a string junction in the N=
6 model, where i=
1
,
2,
3.Notethat,inthismodel,allthespeciesareinvolvedinthe formationofaY-typejunctions,eachoneofthembeingassociated totwodifferentstrings.3.2. 8species
TheresultsobtainedforN
=
8 arequalitativelysimilartothose presentedfor N=
6,butwithan increasedcomplexity associated with the larger number of species. In this case, apart from the fourdifferentdefects/anti-defectswithfourspeciesrepresentedby{
i,
i+
4,
i+
1,
i−
3}
(wherei=
1,
..
4),thereare eightdefect/anti-defect configurations composed by five species. They are
com-posedbytheclockwise/counterclockwisedispositionofthespecies
{
i,
i+
4,
i+
1,
i−
2,
i+
3}
(wherei=
1,
..
8)aroundthedefectcores. Wecallthedefectsformedby fourandfivespecies,typeIandII, respectively.The right panel of Fig. 3 depicts one snapshot taken from a 10242 stochastic network simulation ofthe N
=
8 model forthe parameter set P . The colors indicate the species that individuals belongto(seeFig. 1).Whitedotsrepresentemptysites.In addition, the results provided by three-dimensional simu-lations are presented in the right panel of Fig. 4. The snapshot representsa643regionofathree-dimensional2563stochastic net-work simulationswithperiodicboundaryconditionsofthe N
=
8 modelfortheset P .Analogously to the N
=
6 model, the extension to three spa-tial dimensions gives rises to a string network with junctions. Nonetheless, in the N=
8 model there are two different types of strings, in which either four (type I) or five different species (type II) areinvolved.One stringoftype Iandtwooftype II are required in order to produce thestable Y-type junctions seen inFig. 5. IllustrationoftheformationofY-typejunctionsinthemodelsN=6 (leftpanel)andN=8 (rightpanel).Thecross-sectionsofthedifferenttypesofstringsjoining thejunctionsarepresented,wherei=1,...,N2.
Fig. 6. Snapshotsobtainedfromtwo-dimensional10242meanfieldsimulationsof
theN=6 (leftpanels)and N=8 (rightpanels)modelsfortheparameterset P . (Forinterpretationofthecolorsinthisfigure,thereader isreferredtotheweb versionofthisarticle.)
thesimulationsofthe N
=
8 model.Thelower panel ofFig. 5 il-lustratestheformationofaY-typejunctioninthismodel.4. Meanfieldtheorysimulations
LetusdefineN
+
1 scalarfields(φ
0,φ
1,φ
2,. . .
,φ
N) represent-ingthefractionofspacearoundagivenpointoccupiedbyempty sites (φ
0) and by individualsof the species i (φ
i), satisfying the constraintφ
0+ φ
1+ . . . + φ
N=
1. For an even N>
4 the mean fieldequationsofmotion˙φ
0=
D∇
2φ
0−
rφ0 N i=1φ
i+
p N i=1⎛
⎜
⎝
N−4 2 α=1φ
iφ
i+α+
N−1 α=N+4 2
φ
iφ
i+α⎞
⎟
⎠ ,
(2)˙φ
i=
D∇
2φ
i+
rφ0φ
i−
p⎛
⎜
⎝
N−4 2 α=1φ
iφ
i+α+
N−1 α=N+4 2
φ
iφ
i+α⎞
⎟
⎠ ,
(3)describethe average dynamicsofthe modelsstudied inthe pre-vious section (see [7],for moredetails).Here, a dot representsa derivativewithrespecttothephysicaltimeandD
=
2m isthe dif-fusionrate.4.1.Twoandthree-dimensionalnumericalresults
Fig. 6depictstwosnapshotstakenfrom10242 meanfield net-worksimulationswithperiodicboundaryconditionsoftheN
=
6 (left panel) and N=
8 (right panel) models for the parameter set P .Initialconditionswithφ
i=
1 ifi=
s andφ
i=
0 ifi=
s were setateachgridpoint(φ
0 wassettozeroateverygridpoint).Heres isaspeciesdrawnrandomlyateachgridpoint.
Theresultsprovided bythemeanfieldsimulations(Fig. 6)are similar to those obtained from the stochastic network evolution (Fig. 3),exceptforthenoise(thecolorschemeisthesameinboth figures).Thiscorrespondencealsooccursinthethree-dimensional simulations. In particular, the macroscopic dynamics depicted in the snapshot shown in Fig. 7 obtained from three-dimensional 2563 meanfieldtheorysimulationsoftheN
=
6 and N=
8 mod-els,issimilar(again,exceptforthenoise)tothatshowninFig. 4
.4.2.Defectprofile
Letusnowconsiderthedefectprofiles,i.e.,thestationary num-ber density of empty spaces in and around the defect cores. In other words,let us studythe spatial distribution of
φ
0 around a defectcenter,consideringthatthedefecthasradialsymmetryand iscenteredatr=
0.Fig. 7. Snapshotstakenfromthree-dimensionalmeanfieldsimulationsoftheN=6 (leftpanel)and N=8 (rightpanel)models.Thefiguresrepresent643regionsof
2563simulationsfortheparametersetP .
Fig. 8showsthevalueof
φ
0,asafunctionofthedistancer to thedefectcore,obtainedfordefectsassociatedwithfourandfive species from mean field simulations ofthe N=
6 (upper panel) and N=
8 (middleandlower panels)models. The disposition of the species around the defect cores is shown in the inset plots. Thenumericalresultsshowastrongdependenceofthedefect pro-fileonthemodelparameters.Specifically,thedefectprofileheight is larger in the case of set P, dominated by predation interac-tions.Onthecontrary,alargerreproductionrateleadstoasmaller numberdensityofemptyspaces(set R).Finally,alargermobility parameterleads tothebroadeningofthedefectprofile,sincethe individualsaremorelikelytomoveoutsidethecoreofthedefect intoenemyterritory(set M).Fig. 8alsoshowsthat,inthemodelwithN
=
8 speciesandfor fixed(m, p,r),thedefectisbroaderwhenthenumberofspecies composingthedefectisincreasedfrom4 to5.4.3. Stringloop
We now investigate the collapseof a circular string loop us-ing mean field theory simulations in a cubic lattice. To identify thestringwedefineanewvariable
ϕ
(
r,
t)
≡
max(φ
0(
r,
t))
− φ
c0,
0)
. Here,φ
0c represents a threshold which guarantees that only grid points with a high number density of empty sites, close to the core of the string, are identified as belonging to the string. The averagenumberdensityofempty sitesassociatedtothe stringis thendefinedbyρ
(t
)
=
1N
2 rϕ
(
r,t) .
(4)We recallthat theaveragenumberofempty sitesper unit string length(
μ
)doesnotchangesignificantlywithtime.Therefore,the loop perimeteris proportional toρ
(
t)
andthe area ofthe string loopa(
t)
evolvesproportionallytoρ
2(
t)
.Thetimeevolutionoftheareaa
(
t)
ofthecircleenclosedbythe loopisdeterminedusingmeanfieldtheorysimulations ina 2563 cubiclattice.Werunsimulationsfortwodifferentthresholdvalues inorder toensure theaccuracyandreliability oftheresults. The upperpanel ofFig. 9
displaystheevolutionoftheareaofastring loopformed byfourdistinctspeciesa4(
t)
intheN=
6 modelfor theparameterset P .Notethattheresultsarealmostidenticalfor both choicesofthresholdvalues,φ
0c=
0.
06 andφ
0c=
0.
15,which correspondapproximatelyto25% and60% ofthemaximumofφ
0 (φ
0max)atthecoreofthestring.Similarresultswerefoundforthe evolutionofthearea ofthecircleenclosed bystringloops associ-atedtofourandfivedistinct speciesa4(
t)
anda5(
t)
inthe N=
8 modelfor theparameter set P (see lower panel ofFig. 9
).Fig. 9
showsthattheloopareadecreaseslinearlyintimeaccordingto
a(t)
=
a01
−
t tc,
(5)Fig. 8. DefectprofilesobtainedfordefectswithfourandfivespeciesfrommeanfieldsimulationsforN=6 (leftpanel)andN=8 (rightandlowerpanels).Thered,green andbluelinesrepresenttheresultsgeneratedbyassumingtheparametersetsP ,M andR,respectively.Theinsetplotsrepresentthedispositionofthespeciesaroundthe defectcores.(Forinterpretationofthereferencestocolorinthisfigurelegend,thereaderisreferredtothewebversionofthisarticle.)
Fig. 9. MeanfieldevolutionoftheareasofstringloopsintheN=6 (leftpanel)andN=8 (rightpanel)models,computedbytakingdifferentthresholdvalues.Notethat a4(t)anda5(t)representtheareasoftypeIandtypeIIstringloops,respectively.TheresultswereobtainedbytakingtheparametersetP .
wheretc isthe collapsetime or, equivalently,that radius of cur-vature decreasesproportionally to t1/2. Asimilar resulthas been obtainedinRef.[15]foradifferentmodelallowing forstring net-workswithoutjunctions.
5. Scalingbehavior
Finally,weconsiderthescalingbehaviorofthemodels investi-gatedintheprevioussectionsusingmeanfieldtheorysimulations. Tothispurpose,letusdefinethecharacteristiclength L ofthe de-fectnetworkas L
=
μ
ρ
∝
1ρ
,
(6)where
μ
isthe averagenumberofempty spacesassociated with thedefects(perunitstringlength,inthreespatialdimensions)andρ
istheaverage numberdensityofempty sitesassociatedtothe defectnetworkdefinedbyEq.(4).We constrain the evolution of the characteristiclength of the stringnetwork withtimeusingsets of10meanfieldsimulations of themodels M, R and P . Eachsimulation starts withdifferent random initial conditionsand foreach ofthem we compute the scalingexponent
λ
associatedwiththescalinglawL∝
tλ.The upperand lower panels of Fig. 10 show the dependence of
λ
onthethresholdφ
0c forthe sets M, P and R,forN=
6 andN
=
8,respectively(inunitsofφ
c0/φ
max0 ).ForN=
8,φ
0max istaken asthemaximumofφ
0atthecoreofthestringoftypeI.Theerror bars representthe standard deviationin an ensembleof 10 sim-ulations. Fig. 10showsthat iftheφ
c0 is between20% and60% ofφ
max0 , the scaling constantλ
doesnot show a significant depen-denceonthethreshold.Outsidethisinterval,thisisnolongerthe case.Forlowervaluesofφ
0c,thishappensbecauselowdensity re-gions farawayfromthecorearebeingtakenasbelongingto the defect.Ontheotherhand,thenumberoflatticepoints associated withthedefectmaybecometoosmallforhighervaluesofφ
0c.TheaverageevolutionofL withtimet wasobtainedforsetsof 10 distinct two- and three-dimensionalmean field network
sim-Fig. 10. Thedependenceofthescalingexponentλonthethresholdφc
0 inameanfieldsimulationwith N=6 (leftpanel)and N=8 (rightpanel)species.Theresults
wereobtainedbycarryingout10 simulationsof20482two-dimensionalnetworksforawiderangeofφc
0,fortheparametersetsM,P andR.Theerrorbarsrepresentthe
standarddeviationinanensembleof10simulations.
Fig. 11. ScalingbehaviorforthemodelswithN=6 andN=8 differentspeciesobtainedusing20482two-dimensional(leftpanel)and2563three-dimensional(rightpanel)
meanfieldnumericalsimulationsfortheparametersetP .
ulations(20482 and2563) withrandom initial conditionsforthe parameterset P .
Fig. 11
showsthat thecharacteristiclengths L6S (6 species) and L8S (8 species) evolve in reasonable agreement withthe scaling law L∝
tλ, withλ
=
1/
2, characteristic of net-worksin whichthe dynamicsis curvature driven.Still, the devi-ationwithrespect toλ
=
1/
2, alreadypresentinthe caseofthe stringnetworks without junctions studied in[25], appears to be significantanddeservesfurtherinvestigation.Here,thepoints de-notetheaveragevalueofL computedfromthesimulationandthe errorbarsprovideinformationontheroot-mean-squaredeviation foreachsetof10 simulations.InallcasesthevalueofL was nor-malizedtounityatt=
100,theparameters (m, p,r)were setto (0.10,0.80, 0.10) and thethresholdφ
0c was fixed at 40% ofφ
max0(forN
=
8 thethresholdφ
c0wasobtainedbyconsideringthevalue ofφ
max0 obtainedfortypeIIstrings).These results are consistent with those obtained in Ref. [25]
formodelsallowingforstringnetworkswithoutjunctionsinthree spatialdimensions.Asimilarbehaviormayalsobefoundinother physicalsystems,inparticularinthecaseofcurvaturedriven dy-namicsofstringnetworksincondensedmatter.
6. Commentsandconclusions
Inthisworkwehaveshownthattherearespecificsub-classes, withanevennumberofspecies,ofamoregeneralfamilyofMay– Leonard models which lead to the formation of string networks withjunctions,associatedtoregions withahighconcentrationof empty spaces. We have investigated the dynamics of these net-works using stochastic and mean field network simulations, as-sumingthatthepredation,reproductionandmobilityprobabilities areconstantinspaceandtime.Wehavefoundthatthepresenceof junctionsdoesnothaveasignificantimpactonthescaling behav-ior ofthecharacteristicmacroscopic scaleof thenetwork L with
the physical time t, showing that it grows roughly proportional to t1/2.
Acknowledgements
We thankCAPES, CNPq,CNPq/Fapern, andFCT-Portugal for
fi-nancial support. The work of PPA was supported by Fundação
para a Ciênciae a Tecnologia(FCT) throughthe Investigador FCT contract ofreferenceIF/00863/2012 andPOPH/FSE(EC)by FEDER funding through the program ProgramaOperacionaldeFactoresde Competitividade,COMPETE.
References
[1]B. Kerr,M.A.Riley,M.W.Feldman,B.J.M. Bohannan, Mobilitypromotes and jeopardizesbiodiversityinrock–paper–scissorsgames,Nature418(2002)171. [2]J.J.Leisner,J.Haaber,Intraguildpredationprovidesaselectionmechanismfor bacterialantagonisticcompounds,Proc.R.Soc.B,Biol.Sci.279(2012)4513. [3]H.Cheng,N.Yao,Z.Huang,J.Park,Y.Do,Y.Lai,Mesoscopicinteractionsand
speciescoexistenceinevolutionarygamedynamicsofcycliccompetitions,Sci. Rep.4(2014)7486.
[4]A.J.Daly,J.M.Baetens,B.D.Baets,Theimpactofinitialevennessonbiodiversity maintenanceforafour-speciesinsilicobacterialcommunity,J.Theor.Biol.387 (2015)189–205.
[5]R.C.Sole,J.Bascompte,Self-OrganizationinComplexEcosystems,PrincetonUP, Princeton,2006.
[6]M.A.Nowak,EvolutionaryDynamics:ExploringtheEquationsofLife,Harvard UniversityPress,2006.
[7]R.May,W.Leonard,Nonlinearaspectsofcompetitionbetweenthreespecies, SIAMJ.Appl.Math.29(1975)243.
[8]T.Reichenbach,M.Mobilia,E.Frey,Mobilitypromotesandjeopardizes biodi-versityinrock–paper–scissorsgames,Nature448(2007)1046.
[9]T.Reichenbach,M.Mobilia,E.Frey,Noiseandcorrelationsinaspatial popula-tionmodelwithcycliccompetition,Phys.Rev.Lett.99(2007)238105. [10]M.Peltomaki,M.Alava,Three- andfour-staterock–paper–scissorsgameswith
diffusion,Phys.Rev.E78(2008)031906.
[11]W.-X.Wang,X.Ni,Y.-C.Lai,C.Grebogi,Patternformation,synchronization,and outbreakofbiodiversityincyclicallycompetinggames,Phys.Rev.E83(2011) 011917.
[12]A.Dobrinevski,E.Frey,ExtinctioninneutrallystablestochasticLotka–Volterra models,Phys.Rev.E85(2012)051903.
[13]A.Roman,D.Konrad,M.Pleimling,Cycliccompetitionoffourspecies:domains andinterfaces,J.Stat.Mech.TheoryExp.(2012)P07014.
[14]P.P.Avelino,D.Bazeia,L.Losano,J.Menezes,VonNeummann’s andrelated scal-inglawsinrock–paper–scissors-typegames,Phys.Rev.E86(2012)031119.
[18]A.Dobrinevski,M.Alava,T.Reichenbach,E.Frey,Mobility-dependentselection ofcompetingstrategyassociations,Phys.Rev.E89(2014)012721.
[19]C.Rulquin, J.J.Arenzon,Globallysynchronizedoscillationsincomplexcyclic games,Phys.Rev.E89(2014)032133.
[20]P.P.Avelino,D.Bazeia,L.Losano,J.Menezes,B.F.deOliveira,Interfaceswith internalstructuresingeneralizedrock–paper–scissorsmodels,Phys.Rev.E89 (2014)042710.
[21]B.Szczesny,M.Mobilia,A.M.Rucklidge,Characterizationofspiralingpatterns inspatialrock–paper–scissorsgames,Phys.Rev.E90(2014)032704. [22]L.Varga,J.Vukov,G.Szabó,Self-organizingpatternsinanevolutionaryrock–
paper–scissorsgameforstochasticsynchronizedstrategyupdates,Phys.Rev.E 90(2014)042920.
[27]M.F.Weber,G.Poxleitner,E.Hebisch,E.Frey,M.Opitz,Chemicalwarfareand survivalstrategies inbacterialrangeexpansions, J.R. Soc.Interface11 (96) (2014)20140172.
[28]D.Grošelj,F.Jenko,E.Frey,Howturbulenceregulatesbiodiversityinsystems withcycliccompetition,Phys.Rev.E91(2015)033009.
[29]B.Intoy, M.Pleimling,Synchronization and extinction incyclicgames with mixedstrategies,Phys.Rev.E91(2015)052135.
[30]G.Szabó,K.S.Bodó,B.Allen,M.A.Nowak,Fourclassesofinteractionsfor evo-lutionarygames,Phys.Rev.E92(2015)022820.
[31]A.Roman,D.Dasgupta,M.Pleimling,Atheoreticalapproachtounderstand spa-tialorganizationincomplexecologies,J.Theor.Biol.403(2016)10–16.