*e-mail:peter.johansson@gsf.i
Eskers and bedrock gorges (tunnel valleys) in the Pakasaivo
area,westernFinnishLapland
PeterJohansson
GeologicalSurveyofFinland,P.O.Box77,FIN96101Rovaniemi,Finland
Abstract
StudiesofthedeglaciationofthelastScandinavianIceSheet,includingthebehaviorof theicesheetandmeltwateractivity,wereconductedinthevicinityofthePakasaivocan-yonlake,locatedinwesternFinnishLapland.Pakasaivoitself,acircularbasinupto100m deep,wasformedinthebrokenbedrockbyglacialerosionandmeltwaterstreams.Itwas originallyrelatedtoaformersubglacialmeltwatersystem,includingthedeepKeinokur-sugorge.BoththisgorgeandthePakasaivocanyonlakewereformedsubglaciallyduring anearlystageofdeglaciation.Itwascharacterizedbyintensemeltwatererosion,whichin Pakasaivoalsoseemstohavegeneratedastrongwhirl.Steep-crestedeskerridgeswere subsequentlydeposited;subaerialmeltwateractivitythenfollowed.Finallythemeltwater wasdischargedfromtheice-dammedlakenorthoftheareaandpassedthroughthePa- kasaivocanyontotheice-freeareas.Thiscausedadditionalintenseerosionofthecan-yonloorandwalls,andthedeepcircularbasinishighlysimilartoaplungepoolformed atthebaseofacataract.
Keywords: glacialgeology,deglaciation,subglacialenvironment,eskers,meltwaterchan-nels,canyons,lakes,erosion,Pakasaivo,LaplandProvince,Finland
1.Introduction
ThedeglaciationoftheLateWeichselianScandi-navianIceSheetinnorthernmostFinlandtook place mainly in a supra-aquatic environment accompanied by abundant meltwater streams. In northern Scandinavia, Tanner (1915) car-ried out the irst extensive study of subglacial meltwater systems; he provided an overview ofboththepalaeohydrographyoftheareaand therecessionoftheicemargin.Mikkola(1932) andVirkkala(1955),amongothers,continued the study of eskers and related erosional land-formscreatedbymeltwaterinFinnishLapland. Theyconcludedthatthemeltwatersystemsre- sponsibleforlongeskersequencesweresubgla-cial.Whencrossingmountainrangesservingas waterdivides,thesubglacialmeltwatersystems erodedgorgesandchannelsintheoverburden,
frequentlyintothebedrock.InScandinavia,the BritishIsles,theUSA,andCanada,themajori- tyofeskersequencesandrelatederosionalland-formsweresimilarlyinterpretedashavingbeen formed subglacially (Mannerfelt, 1945; Sis-sons,1961;Holtedahl,1967;Lundqvist,1969 and1979,Sugden&John1976;Clark&Wal-der,1994;Brennand,1994and2000).Intheir studies conducted in northern Finland, Pent-tilä (1963), Kujansuu (1967) and Johansson (1995)appliedsubglacialpaleohydrographyto thestudyofdeglaciation,combiningitwithin-formationonthedevelopmentofmarginaland extramarginalmeltwatereffects.
about 120 km north of the Arctic Circle, at 67°37’00” N and 23°47’45” E (Fig. 1). It is an uninhabited wilderness region between the western Lapland mountain region and Muo-nionjoki–Tornionjoki, the river on the border betweenFinlandandSweden.Pakasaivoitselfis asteep–sidedcanyonwithaclear-wateredlake atthebottom.Itisaprotectedgeologicsitethat hasbecomepopularoverthelastfewyears,are-sultoftheregion’sgrowingtouristindustryand improvedroads.
2.Regionaldescription
The region around Pakasaivo is underlain by Precambrian bedrock of the Fennoscandian Shield. Acidic plutonic rocks, such as gran-ite and monzonite, are characterized by cubic jointsets(Lehtonen,1981).Thetopographyis
formedbyundulatinghillylandwithglacigen-icreliefandrelativealtitudevariationsof100– 200 m. During the glaciations the continental icesheetevenedoutthelandforms.Itsmoothed and rounded the mountains, depressions and valleys,manyofwhichareexpressionsoffaults andfracturezonesofthebedrock.
Multipleglacialadvancesandretreatsinthe regionhavebeendescribedfromtheRautuvaara mineregion15kmsouthofPakasaivo(Hirvas, 1991).The EarlyWeichselian till bed and till-covered eskers around the Rautuvaara region provideevidenceofanicelowfromNWtoSE. Ice-lowindicatorssuggesttheicedividewassit-uatedsouthofthestudyareaattheendofthe LateWeichselian,andthedirectionoficelow was from south to north (Hirvas, 1991).The icemarginrecededtowardstheSW,andthePa-kasaivoregionwasdeglaciatedlessthan10000
Pakasaivo
Pakasaivo
Pakasaivo
Pakasaivo
NORWAY
SWEDEN
FINLAND
Pallas-Ounastunturi Ounastunturi Ounastunturi Ounastunturi
Muonio
Jokijärvi Jokijärvi Jokijärvi Jokijärvi Jokijärvi Jokijärvi Jokijärvi Jokijärvi Jokijärvi
Ylläs Ylläs Kihlanki
Muonionjoki River
Tornionjoki T T
River Muonio Ice Lake
50 km
Ounasjoki Ounasjoki Ounasjoki River River
Rautuvaara Rautuvaara Rautuvaara
60o 20o
0o 70o
68o 69o
22o
24o
years ago (Saarnisto, 2000). During deglacia-tion,extensiveice-dammedlakesexistednorth ofthestudyarea,andwaterfromthemlowed alongtheicemargintowardstheSE,intoice-free areas (Fig. 1). After deglaciation of the MuonioRivervalley,theAncylusLake,anan- cientphaseoftheBaltic,extendeduptheriv-ervalleytoapointabout20kmsouthofthe presentstudyarea(Fig.1).
3.ThemorphologyofthePakasaivo
canyonlake
WesternFinnishLaplandhasanumberofclear-wateredlakesandpondsnamed“saivo”,being roundorovalinshapeand50–200mindiam-eter.Thesaivolakesareexceptionallydeep,and someofthemarecharacterizedbysteepslopes
and cliffs that resemble deep, water-illed can- yons.Othersaivolakesaregroundwater-fedhol-lowsorkettlesbetweeneskerridges.Thesaivo lakesarenotageneticallyclassiiedtypeoflake, but their round shape and great depth make themrepresentativeoftheregion.
Pakasaivolake,whichis1.1kilometerslong, is located within a N-S trending fracture zone of the monzonite bedrock (Fig. 2). Its south-ernendhasgentlysloping,stonytillshores.In thenortherlydirection,theenclosingbasinris-esandbecomessteeper.Inthemiddlethelake issqueezedbetweensteepverticalrockwalls20– 25mhigh,andatitsnarrowest,thelakeisonly 15mwide.Atitsnorthernendthelakewidens intoanalmostcircularbasinthathasadiame-ter of 120–140 m and is surrounded by steep rockwalls30–40metersabovethelakesurface
2 km 240
340
300
340 260
220
D
A
D
B
C
D
D
260
260
Karhulaki
Keinokursu Rihmakursu
Hietaojankankaat Hietaojankankaat Hietaojankankaat Hietaojankankaat Hietaojankankaat
Valkeajo V V
ki
300
Pakasaivo
Lake Pakajärvi
Karhuojankankaat Karhuojankankaat
Esker
Pakajärvi Pakajärvi Pakajärvi
Esker Esker
F
F
F
23 50´o50´ 23 45´o
Fig.2.Subglacial,subaerial,andmarginalmeltwatersystemsinthePakasaivoarea.a)Routeofasubglacialmeltwater streamduringitsearlystage.b)Routeofasubglacialmeltwaterstreamduringitslatestage.c)Subaerialmeltwater streamandakamedepositedatitsmouth.d)Marginalchannel.e)AreacoveredbytheMuonioIceLake.f)Spill-wayoftheicelakeleadingtoPakasaivo.
alkeajo
5 m 1 m
2
4
6
m
N
S
Fig.3.AtthenorthernendofthePaka-saivo canyon lake, the steep rock cliffs rise up to 40 m above the surface of thelake.
Fig. 4. Longitudinal proile obtained by echosoundingofthePakasaivocanyon lake.Thepothole-shapedbasinatitsleft end is approximately 120–140 m wide and60mdeep.Thebottomconsistsof bedrockorboulders,whilethebedrock inthecentralandsouthernpartofthe lake is covered by a mud deposit less thanonemeterthick.
(218mabovesealevel)(Saarnisto,1991).The rockwallsaresteplike.Weatheringhasformed hollowsandcaveswithinthestepsthatcanbe overtwometersdeep.Talusconesarefoundat thefootoftheslopes(Fig.3).
The depth of Pakasaivo was determined in the summer of 2000, using an echo sounder (Furuno FE-881 MK-II). A longitudinal pro-ileofthelakefromsouthtonorthrevealeda few basin-like deeps, separated by rock ridges wherethewaterdepthis8–10m(Fig.4).The bedrockortalusmaterialontheserockridgesis coveredbyathinlayerofmud.Atthenorthern endofthelake,thebottomdropsprecipitously, thedepthbeing60meters(Fig.4).ThePaka-
saivocanyonhas100mofrelieffromthebot-tomofthelaketothetopofthecanyonwall, makingittheseconddeepestlakeinnorthern Finland (Karlsson, 1986).The echo-sounding proilesexplainthatthewallsunderwatercon-sistofrock(Fig.4).
4.Evidenceformeltwateraction
aroundPakasaivo
Muonio(Johanssonetal.,1989).Itfollowsthe depressions and valleys in the direction of ice retreat,whichistypicaloftheeskersinthearea. Asmosteskersystems,thisonedoesnotcon- sistofacontinuouseskerridge.Betweenthees-kerridgesandhillstherearelandformscreated bymeltwatererosionaswellaszoneswithno signs of meltwater action (Johansson, 1995). Because these zones are short, the esker sys-temcanbetracedinaNNWdirectionacross the river Muonionjoki into northern Sweden (NordkalottProject,1987).
Depositional landforms related to the esk-er sequence are found in valleys and on gen-tly sloping lower hillsides.The largest eskers intheieldareaareKarhuojankankaat,SWof theKarhulakihillandthePakajärviesker,NE ofit(Fig.2)andaremorphologicallydistinct. Karhuojankankaatis15–20mhighwithalat andmostlyeventop.Higherupontheslopeof Karhulaki the esker narrows into a low ridge. Thewallsofgravelpitsintheeskershowthat itiscomposedofstratiiedsandandgravelwith beddingthatslopesgentlytowardsthelanks. Incontrast,thePakajärvieskerisasteep-sided, sharp-crestedridge,about1.5kmlong,which begins on the NE slope of Karhulaki. From there it descends towards the NE and has an undulatinglongitudinalproile.Theeskerrises 30–40mabovethelevelofPakajärvi,theadja-centlake.Therearenocuts,butjudgingfrom the stony surface it consists of coarse-grained cobble gravel. NW of the esker ridge, on the southernshoreofLakePakajärvi,thereisagla-cioluvialformationthatslopesgentlytowards the lake and covers an area of about 0.5 km2
(Fig.2).Itssurfacemorphologyisvariable,with hummocks of varying height and kettle holes betweenthem.
Theeskersareseparatedbydeepgorgesand channelsincisedintoKarhulakihill.Thechan-nels are either dry or contain small brooks. Theirshapesresembletheerosionallandforms created by rapidly lowing water. The larg-estofthemistheKeinokursucanyon(Fig.2), whichconnectswiththeeskerridgesofKarhu-ojankankaat,andthePakajärvieskeroneither
sideofthehill.Adeepcutintosedimentand bedrock, Keinokursu is over four kilometers long,50–150mwide,and30mdeep.Theval-ley loor contains peaty layers, and the steep walls are 20–50 m high. On the SE slope of Karhulaki and on Hietaojankankaat there are canyonsofsimilarshape,gentlysinuous,15– 25mdeepandslopingintotheValkeajokiriv-ervalley.ThemorphologyofKeinokursugorge resemblesthe‘kursu’typecanyonsfoundinthe areabetweenPajalaandKaresuandoinnorth-ern Sweden (Rudberg, 1949; Olvmo, 1989), someofwhichareconsiderablylargererosional landformsthanthecanyonsdescribedhere.
5.DeglaciationofthePakasaivoarea
5.1Subglacialenvironment
Thesubglacialeskerwasformedinameltwa-tertunnelatthebaseoftheice,inthemarginal zone.Thistookplaceattheendofthelastde- glaciation.Theformationofasubglacialmelt-waterstreamrequiredanimpermeablebedas wellasalongperiodwhentheicesheetwasin adynamicstateandthetemperatureatthebase oftheicewasstable,sothatthelowofmeltwa- terremainedsteady(Pair,1997).Thiswaspos-sibleonlyinacompletelywater-illedconduit wherethemeltwaterstream,subjectedtohigh hydrostatic pressure, was in balance with the pressure caused by the surrounding ice sheet. Becauseofthepressure,themeltwatertended tolowinthedirectionofthepressuregradients andtowardstheicemargin,wherethepressure decreased as the ice became thinner (Shreve, 1972; Röthlisberger, 1972; Nye, 1973). Ac-cording to Syverson et al. (1994), the condi-tions described above were possible when the thickness of the ice exceeded 100 m. At that timetheicewasstillplasticandabletoadjust, e.g.,tothechangescausedbythevariablelow; suchadjustmenttookplaceaswideningornar-rowing of the conduit and as changes in its shape(Lundqvist,1979;Shreve,1985).
2 km
(meltwater erosion)
A
(meltwater erosion)
B
(esker deposition)
(esker deposition)
Pakasaivo
C
Pakasaivo
D
Pakasaivo
(esker deposition) Keinokursu gorge
Pakajärvi esker ridge
E
Pakasaivo
Rihmakuru gorge
4
5 1
2
3
6
7
8
9
10
Fig.5.GlaciohydrographichistoryofthePakasaivoarea.1=Icemargin,2=Directionoficelow,3=Tunnelvalley (subglacialmeltwatersystem),4=Whirl,5=Marginalchannel,6=Gorge,7=Esker,8=Kettleholes,9=Areacov-eredbyicelakeand10=Spillway.
Since the Keinokursu tunnel channel clear-ly crosses a terrain obstacle, seems to connect theeskersformedsubglaciallyatbothends,and sinceitslongitudinalproileisconvex,wecan concludethatKeinokursuwasformedasare-sult of erosion by pressurized meltwater
5a).Asshownbythemarginalchannelsbranch-ing out to the east, the meltwater lowed to-wardstheNE,fromthemainchanneltowards theeasternslopesoftheKarhulakihill(Fig.2). Thechannelswereformedafterthesubglacial phase, as the meltwater that earlier was dis-chargedfromthemouthofthetunnellowed along the ice margin. Presumably, the tunnel channelformationhadalonglife,asthechan-nelcutintobedrockgavethemeltwaterstream betterprotectionagainstthemovementsofthe icesheetthanachannelerodedonlyintotheice (Nye,1973).
As deglaciation progressed and the ice thinnedout,thepressureinthemeltwatertun-nel fell and the process of erosion became a processofdeposition(Fig.5b).Sometimesthis changealsotookplaceduetovariationsinland- formsorlowconditions.However,thedepo-sitional landforms did not cover the erosional landforms everywhere.The Karhuojankankaat esker (Fig. 2) is located in a place where the meltwaterlowinthesubglacialconduitturned uphill.Asthelowsloweddown,thetransport-ingcapacityofthemeltwaterweakenedandthe abundantmaterialtransportedbythestreamac- cumulatedonthelooroftheconduit.Karhu-ojankankaatwasdepositedintheformofalat esker,withaleveltopinplaces.Itresemblesthe eskersdepositedonuphillslopesineasternLap-land (Johansson, 1995). According to Shreve (1985),studiesoftheKatahdineskersystemin Maine showed that the lat tops of the eskers wereformedasthemeltwaterconduitbecame lowandlatsubsequenttofreezingofthewalls oftheconduit.This,inturn,wascausedbythe slowingofthestream,whichisalsorelectedby thegrainsizeofthedeposits.Kujansuu(1967) foundthatthesedimentsineskersthatwerede-positedontheupstreamsideofthedivideare better-sorted and iner-grained than the sedi-mentsineskersonthedownstreamside.
The erosional and depositional landforms relect the changes in glacier dynamics and the glacioluvial environment during deglaci-ation. The bedrock of the present canyon is
deeplyfractured.Thecanyonwasfurtherdeep-enedbythesouthwesternicelowalongitand bytheglacialerosionthatoccurredonitsloor. This,however,isinsuficienttoexplainthefor- mationofthecanyonoritspeculiarshape.Ero-sionbysubglacialmeltwateristheonlywayin whichitcouldhavebeenformed.Dependingon thepowerofthestreamandtheextentofero- sionitcaused,theresultcanbevariouserosion- allandforms,e.g.,polishedrocksurfaces,chan-nelscutintothebedrockanditsfracturedparts, andgorgesandcanyonscutdeepintothebed-rock(Vivian,1970).Ifthebedrockhadalready been fractured, the pressurized meltwater was abletoerodegorgesofconsiderabledepth(Bak-er,1987).
At the early stage of the last deglaciation, whentheareawasstillcoveredbyanicesheet hundreds of meters thick, a powerful subgla-cial meltwater stream entered from Keinokur- suintoPakasaivoandcontinuedtheworkstart-edbytheglacier.Asitlowednortheastwards, the ice had already eroded a fracture zone in thebedrock.Sinceitspressurewasstrong,the meltwateractionwasrestrictedtoerosiononly (Nye,1973).Thelowmayhavebeenaccom- paniedbyapowerfulwhirl,whichconcentrat-edtheerosiveforceonapreviouslybrokenspot, grindingthehollowdeeperanddeeper(Fig.5a). InordertoformabasinthesizeofPakasaivo, themeltwatererosionmusthavecontinuedfor alongtime,anditmusthavestartedcenturies beforetheicesheetmelted.However,observa- tionsmadeintheAlpsindicatethatconsidera-bleerosionallandformsaroseinashorttimein consequenceofanexceptionallypowerfulpres-surizedwaterwhirl(Vivian,1970).Itisworth notingthatrockfacesvisibleabovethewaterof Pakasaivoshownodistinctsurfacespolishedby themeltwaterstream,suchasspindlelutesor sichelwannen,andnoformstypicalofpotholes. The circular form of the lake seems to be the onlydistinctsignofsomekindofsubglacialwa-terwhirl(cf.Shaw1996).
Kujansuu & Hyyppä 1995; Johansson & Ku-jansuu, 1995).They illustrate that the subgla-cialerosionallandformsareoftenrelatedtothe earlystagesofthemeltwatersystemandareold-erthanthedepositionallandforms.Beforethe Pakasjärvi esker was deposited north of Paka-saivo, the subglacial meltwater channel had shiftedabout0.5–1kmtowardstheNW(Figs. 2and5b),whichpreventedthecanyonfrombe-ingilledwithglacioluvialmaterial.Eskersdid notstarttoformuntilthelaststageofthede- glaciation.Theyweredepositedinthemargin-alzone,wherethelowabatedinconsequence ofthethinningoftheice,whichalsomeanta dropinwaterpressure(Lundqvist,1979;Ashley etal.,1991;Claytonetal.,1999).Accordingto Banerjee & McDonald (1975), the deposition oftheeskeronthetunnelloorwastime-trans-gressiveandstartedonlyafewkilometersbefore theedgeoftheretreatingice.
5.2.Subaerialenvironment
Lateral drainage channels are abundant in the Ylläs mountain area, 20 km east of the study area.Their orientation and slope suggest that the gradient of the melting ice margin was about 2 m per 100 m towards the NE (Ab-rahamsson, 1974; Kujansuu, 1967).Thus the icesurfacehadaboutthesamegradientasthe presentNEslopeofKarhulaki(Fig.2).Theice sheetthinnedatarateof2.2–3mayear,andthe icemarginretreatedabout50mannually(Ku-jansuu,1967).ThedepositionofthePakajärvi esker ridge ended with the formation of frac-tures and crevasses that extended through the wholethicknessoftheicesheet.Thefractures andcrevassesgavetheairaccesstothebaseof theicesheet,causingthehydrostaticpressureof themeltwaterstreamtofall.AccordingtoRöth- lishberger(1972),theicesheetlosesitsplastic- ityandcannotmaintainthepressureinamelt-watertunnelatitsbasewhenitislessthan50m thick.Aftertheicehadbrokenup,thesubgla- cialmeltwaterstreamlowinginKeinokursube-camesubaerial(Fig.5c).
Atthesubaerialstage,forashorttimeKei-nokursubecameanopenchannel,alongwhich themeltwaterdischargedfromthetunnellowed aroundthePakajärvieskerridgetotheeastto-wardsPakasaivoandtothenorth,towardsthe Pakajärvilake.Thekettlesontheshoreofthe lakewereformedasiceblocksdislodgedfrom theedgeofthemeltwaterchannel,weretrans- portedwiththestreamandburiedwiththegla-cioluvial material.The meltwater erosion still continuedinthesubaerialenvironment,butthe Keinokursu channel had already been formed anditslocationbeendeinedearlier,inthesub-glacial environment. The formation of kursu canyons that resemble Keinokursu in north-ern Sweden has been interpreted as complete-lysubaerial.AccordingtoRudberg(1949)and Olvmo(1989),canyonsofsuchdimensionscan be formed only by a combination of meltwa-tererosioninanopenchannelandweathering oftherockwallsduetotemperaturevariations. AtKeinokursu,however,nothingsuggestssub-aerialformation,assubglacialeskerridgesform continuationsofthegorgeatbothends,andthe longitudinal proile of the canyon is convex. Themeltwaterstreamcouldhaveloweduphill andoverKarhulakionlyinapressurizedenvi-ronmentatthebaseoftheicesheet.
5.3.Submarginalenvironmentandicelake stage
Meltwaterwasdammedupinfrontofthere-treatingicemargin;theresultwastheformation oftheMuonioIceLake.Itcoveredthreehun-dredsquarekilometersintheMuonionjokiriver valley(Kujansuu,1967;Johanssonetal.,1989) (Fig.1).Intheregionbetweenthemountains Pallas–OunastunturiandYlläs,thereareseveral gorgesandchannels,thatactedasspillways.The spillwaysledeastwardtothedeglaciatedOunas-jokirivervalley(Fig.1).Directlyrelatedtothe Pakasaivocanyonisthespillwaylocatedabout 10kmnorthofthestudyarea,atJokijärvi,that regulatedthewaterleveloftheicelakeatabout 243m.Aftertheremnantsoftheicesheetdisap- pearedfromthevicinityofPakajärviandPaka-saivo,anewspillwayoftheicelakewasformed atPakasaivo.Thewaterfromtheicelakesurged intothePakasaivocanyon,continuingthrough itsouthwardtotheValkeajokivalley(Figs.2and 5e).Thesurfaceoftheicelakesanktoalevel of238m.Afterthisdischarge,theMuonioIce LakehaditsspillwaythroughPakasaivofordec-ades,untilthemarginoftheicesheetretreated fromthePakasaivo–Ylläsregion,whichcaused theemptyingoftheice-dammedlake.
Thedischargeoftheicelakeandthesubse- quentspillwayphaseinluencedtheshapeofPa-kasaivo and its deep, hollow basin.The water discharged from the ice lake surged forcefully acrosstherockthresholdNWofPakasaivointo the lake. In fact, the form of the steep north-ern shore of Pakasaivo resembles a cataract lip (Fig.3).Thedeephollowofthelakeitselfmay beaplungepoollakeformedatthebaseofthe cataract.Similardeepbasinscreatedbythedis-chargeoficedammedlakesarefound,e.g.,Dry Falls in the Channeled Scabland, inWashing- tonstate(Baker,1978;1987),wherethemelt-waterexcavatedadeepcanyoninbrokenrock. ThewaterrushingintothehollowofPakasaivo yielded vertical vortices that caused a turbu- lentpluckingaction.Consequentlytherockde-briswastransportedawayfromthedeeppartof thelake.Later,blocksandstonesthathadbeen weatheredoffthesteepcliffsandloosenedfrom theslopesrolleddown,formingatalusconeon theshore.
6.Conclusion
In view of its location, the Pakasaivo canyon lake,withitsdeepcircularbasinatthenorth- ernend,isclearlyrelatedtothesubglacialmelt- watersystemthatrunsacrossthearea,includ- ingeskerridgesandthesubglacialtunnelchan- nelofKeinokursu.However,thestudyareacon-tainsnoproofindicatingthatsubglacialerosion alonecouldhavecreatedahollowalmostahun-dredmetersdeepinthebedrock.Theformation ofPakasaivoisobviouslypolygenetic.
The Pakasaivo lake is situated in a north-south fracture zone in the bedrock, where the monzonite rock has a cubic jointing pattern and apparently was broken long before the glaciations. During the Late Weichselian gla-ciation phase, the northeastward-lowing ice sheetcausedglacialerosioninthebrokenbed-rock.The subglacial meltwater stream lowing throughthecanyonfurthererodedthebedrock, andatthenorthernendofthelake,wherethe lakeisdeepest,apowerfulwaterwhirlwasprob-ablygenerated,grindingthehollowdeeperand deeper.Thewaterwhirlalsocontributedtothe circular shape of the hollow.The route of the meltwaterstreamshiftedmoretotheNWbe-foretheeskersweredeposited.Inconsequence, thePakasaivocanyonwascoveredwithiceand thuswasnotilledwiththeglacioluvialmate-rial transported by the meltwater. The water fromtheMuonioIceLake,whichlowedsouth- wardtowardstheendofthedeglaciation,add-edtotheerosionaccomplishedbythesubglacial meltwater.Italsoseemstohavehadaneffecton theshapeofthehollowandthesteepcliffonits northernshore.Todaytheytogetherresemblea dried-upcataractwithaplungepoolformedat itsbase.
deglaciation phase of the last glaciation. It is thus concluded that Pakasaivo and the land-formscreatedbymeltwaterinitssurroundings wereformedandattainedtheirpresentappear-anceduringtheinalstageofthelastglaciation.
Acknowledgements
Thestudywascarriedoutinconnectionwiththeba- sicmappingofQuaternarydepositsinthearea,per-formedbytheGeologicalSurveyofFinland(GTK). I express my gratitude to the Geological Survey and itsstafffortheirhelpduringtheieldinvestigations,
andparticularlytoMr.HannuHirvasniemi,Mr.Sep- poPutkinenandMr.JormaValkamafortheirassist-ance with the echo sounding. Mrs. Carola Eklundh translatedthemanuscriptintoEnglishandMrs.Viena Arvoladraftedthemaps;Iextendmysincerethanks to them. I am especially grateful to Professor Bertil Ringberg(StockholmUniversity),ProfessorTimothy G.Fisher(IndianaUniversityNorthwest)andtothe journalreferees,ProfessorMattiEronen(Universityof Helsinki), Dr. Kurt H. Kjaer (Lund University) and editorDr.PetriPeltonenfortheirconstructivecom-mentsonthemanuscriptandfortheirvaluableadvice, whichIhighlyappreciate.
Editorialhandling:Y.KähkönenandP.Peltonen
References
Abrahamsson,K.,1974.Äkäslompolo-områdetsglacial- morfologiochdeglaciation.UmeåUniversitetet,ge-ograiskarapporter.RapportB1,254p.
Ashley,G.M.,Boothroyd,J.C.&Borns;H.W.Jr.,1991. SedimentologyofLatePleistocene(Laurentide)degla-cial-phasedeposits,easternMaine:Anexampleofa temperatemarinegroundedice-sheetmargin.In:An- derson,J.B.&Ashley,G.M.(eds.)Glacialmarinesed- imentation:Paleoclimaticsigniicance.GeologicalSo-cietyofAmericaSpecialPaper261,107–125. Baker, V.R., 1978. Paleohydraulics and hydrodynamics
ofscablandloods.In:Baker,V.R.&Nummedal,D. (eds.)TheChanneledScabland:AguidetotheGe-omorphology of the Columbia Basin, Washington. Planetary Geology Program, National Aeronautics andSpaceAdministration,59–79.
Baker,V.R.,1987.DryfallsoftheChanneledScabland, Washington.GeologicalSocietyofAmericaCentenni-alFieldGuide-CordillieranSection,369–372. Banerjee, I. & McDonald, B.C., 1975. Nature of
esk-ersedimentation.In:Jopling,A.V.&McDonaldB. C.(eds.)Glacioluvialandglaciolacustrinesedimen- tation.SocietyofEconomicPaleontologistsandMin-eralogistsSpecialPublication23,132–154.
Brennand,T.A.,1994.Macroforms,largebedformsand rhythmic sedimentary sequences in subglacial es-kers, south-central Ontario: implications for esker genesis and meltwater regime. Sedimentary Geolo-gy91,9–55.
Brennand,T.A.,2000.Deglacialmeltwaterdrainageand glaciodynamics: inferences from Laurentide eskers, Canada.Geomorphology32,263–293.
Clark,P.U.&Walder,J.S.,1994.Subglacialdrainage,es-kers,anddeformingbedsbeneaththeLaurentideand Eurasianicesheets.GeologicalSocietyofAmericaBul-letin106,304–314.
Clayton,L.,Attig,J.W.&Mickelson,D.M.,1999.Tun- nelchannelsformedinWisconsinduringthelastgla- ciation:In:Mickelson,D.M.&Attig,J.W.(eds.)Gla-cialprocessesPastandPresent.GeologicalSocietyof AmericaSpecialPaper337,69–82.
Hirvas,H.,1991.PleistocenestratigraphyofFinnishLa-pland. Geological Survey of Finland, Bulletin 354, 123p.
Holtedahl, H., 1967. Notes on the formation of fjords and fjord valleys. Geograiska Annaler 49 A, 188– 203.
Johansson,P.,1995.Thedeglaciationintheeasternpart oftheWeichselianicedivideinFinnishLapland.Geo-logicalSurveyofFinland,Bulletin383,72p. Johansson,P.,Maunu,M.,Mäkinen,K.,Sutinen,R.&
Väisänen,U.,1989.Muonio.TheMapofQuaternary depositsanditsExplanation.Sheet27232.Geologi-calSurveyofFinland,Rovaniemi.
Johansson, P. & Kujansuu, R., 1995. Observation on three subglacial drainage systems of different age in Savukoski, eastern Finnish Lapland. In: Autio, S. (ed.)GeologicalSurveyofFinland,CurrentResearch 1993–1994,GeologicalSurveyofFinland,SpecialPa-per20,83–93.
Karlsson,K.-P.(ed.),1986.AtlasofFinland,folio132, Water. National Board of Survey and Geographical SocietyofFinland,Helsinki,31p.
Kujansuu,R.,1967.OnthedeglaciationofwesternFinn-ishLapland.BulletindelaCommissiongéologiquede Finlande232,96p.
Kujansuu, R. & Eriksson, B., 1995. Pre-Late Weichse-liansubglacialglacioluvialerosionandaccumulation atVuotso,FinnishLapland.In:Autio,S.(ed.)Geo-logical Survey of Finland, Current Research 1993– 1994, Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 20,75–82.
Kujansuu, R. & Hyyppä, J., 1995. Vuotson kartta-alueen maaperä. Summary: Quaternary deposits in the Vuotso map sheet area. Geological map of Fin- land1:100000.ExplanationtothemapsofQuater-narydeposits,sheet3742,Vuotso.GeologicalSurvey ofFinland,107p.
Lundqvist, J., 1969. Beskrivning till jordartskarta över Jämtlandslän.Summary:Descriptiontothemapof theQuaternarydepositsoftheCountyofJämtland, Central Sweden. Sveriges Geologiska Undersökning Ca45,418p.
Lundqvist, J., 1979. Morphogenetic classiication of glacioluvialdeposits.SverigesGeologiskaUndersök-ningC767,71p.
Mannerfelt,C.M:son.,1945.Någraglacialmorfologiska formelement och deras vittnesbörd om inlandisens avsmältningsmekanikisvenskochnorskfjällterräng. Summary:Someglaciomorphologicalformsandtheir evidenceastothedownwastingoftheinlandicein SwedishandNorwegianmountainterrain.Geograis-kaAnnaler27,239p.
Mikkola,E.,1932.Onthephysiographyandthelate-gla- cialdepositsinnorthernLapland.BulletindelaCom-missiongéologiquedeFinlande96,88p.
NordkalottProject,1987.MapofQuaternarygeology; sheet1:Quaternarydeposits,northernFennoscandia 1:1 000 000. Geological Surveys of Finland, Nor-wayandSweden.
Nye,J.F.,1973.Wateratthebedofaglacier.Symposi-umontheHydrologyofGlaciers,Cambridge,9–13 September1969.Publicationdel’AssosiationInterna-tionaled’HydrologieScientiique95,189–194. Olvmo,M.,1989.MeltwatercanyonsinSweden.Astudy
of canyons of the “kursu”, “skura” and “grav”-type. UniversityofGöteborg,DepartmentofPhysicalGeo-graphy,Rapport27,126p.
Pair, D.L., 1997.Thin ilm, channelized drainage, or sheetloods benath a portion of the Laurentide Ice Sheet:anexaminationofglacialerosionforms,north-ernNewYorkState,USA.SedimentaryGeology111, 199–215.
Penttilä, S., 1963. The deglaciation of the Laanila area, Finnish Lapland. Bulletin de la Commission géologiquedeFinlande203,71p.
Röthlisberger,H.,1972.Waterpressureinintra-andsu-praglacial channels. Journal of Glaciology 11, 177– 203.
Rudberg, S., 1949. Kursudalar i Norrbotten, en preli-minär översikt. Meddelande Uppsala Universitetets GeograiskaInstitutionenA64,442–495.
Saarnisto, M., 1991. Tornionlaakson geologiset kehi-tysvaiheet. In: Hederyd, O., Alamäki, Y. & Kent-tä,M.(toim.)TornionlaaksonhistoriaI.Jääkaudelta 1600-luvulle. Malungs Boktryckeri, Mahlung, Swe-den,11–44.
Saarnisto,M.,2000.Thelastglacialmaximumandthe deglaciationoftheScandinavianIceSheet.In:Sand-gren, P. (ed.) Environmental changes in Fennoscan-dia during the Late Quaternary. LUNDQUA Re-port37,26–31.
Shaw,J.,1996.AmeltwatermodelforLaurentidesubgla-ciallandscapes.In:McCann,S.B.&Ford,D.C.(eds.) Geomorphology Sans Frontiéres. Wiley, Chichester, NewYork,181–236.
Shreve,R.,1972.Movementofwateringlaciers.Journal ofGlaciology11,205–214.
Shreve,R.,1985.Eskercharacteristicsintermsofglacier physics,Katahdineskersystem,Maine.GeologicalSo-cietyofAmericaBulletin96,639–646.
Sissons,J.B.,1961.Someaspectsofglacialdrainagechan- nelsinBritain.PartII.ScottishGeographicalMaga-zine77,15–36.
Sugden, D.E. & John, B.S., 1976. Glaciers and Land-scape.EdwardArnold,London.376p.
Syverson,K.M.,Gafield,S.J.&Michelson,D.M.,1994. Comparisonofeskermorphologyandsedimentology with former ice-surface topography, Burroughs Gla-cier, Alaska. Geological Society of America Bulletin 106,1130–1142.
Tanner, V., 1915. Studier öfver kvartärsystemet i Fen-noskandias nordliga delar III. (Résumé en français: Etudessurlesystèmequaternairedanslespartiessep- tentrionalesdelaFennoscandie).BulletindelaCom-missiongéologiquedeFinlande38,815p.
Virkkala,K.,1955.Onglacioluvialerosionandaccumu-lationintheTankavaaraarea,FinnishLapland.Acta Geographica14,393–412.