ɍȾɄ
349.2(470)
. .
URL:
http://hdl.handle.net/11435/2222
. 245–252.
ɘ
.
Ɉ
.
ȺɅɆȺȿȼȺ
,
ɫɬɚɪɲɢɣ
ɩɪɟɩɨɞɚɜɚɬɟɥɶ
ɂɧɫɬɢɬɭɬ
ɷɤɨɧɨɦɢɤɢ
,
ɭɩɪɚɜɥɟɧɢɹ
ɢ
ɩɪɚɜɚ
(
ɝ
.
Ʉɚɡɚɧɶ
),
ɝ
.
ɇɚɛɟɪɟɠɧɵɟ
ɑɟɥɧɵ
,
Ɋɨɫɫɢɹ
ɐɟɥɶ
:
,
-.
Ɇɟɬɨɞɵ
:
,
.
,
-:
-
,
-
.
Ɋɟɡɭɥɶɬɚɬɵ
:
,
,
,
-.
,
-
,
.
,
,
.
,
.
-,
-
,
,
,
«
».
ɇɚɭɱɧɚɹ
ɧɨɜɢɡɧɚ
:
,
,
-
,
,
,
.
ɉɪɚɤɬɢɱɟɫɤɚɹ
ɡɧɚɱɢɦɨɫɬɶ
:
,
,
,
-
.
Ʉɥɸɱɟɜɵɟ
ɫɥɨɜɚ
:
;
;
;
-;
;
;
;
.
ȼɜɟɞɟɧɢɟ
,
.
.
-,
«
» «
».
,
,
( . .
),
–
(
-) [1, . 9].
,
(
)
(
)
;
,
,
;
-;
;
(
)
;
-,
.
(
)
.
-,
–
(
),
-.
,
,
[1, . 10].
,
-:
,
-
,
,
,
-,
[2].
.
Ɋɟɡɭɥɶɬɚɬɵ
ɢɫɫɥɟɞɨɜɚɧɢɹ
,
,
,
[1, . 11].
,
(
,
)
,
.
,
.
. .
,
«
–
,
» [3, . 68].
,
,
(
,
)
,
-.
,
,
(
)
-.
,
[4, . 127].
.
,
-
.
, . .
,
:
,
[4, . 128].
, . .
,
,
,
-,
,
,
[5, . 17].
,
-,
,
.
. .
-:
--
,
[5, . 18].
-,
,
,
.
,
,
,
.
,
-,
[6, . 61–62].
,
,
,
,
[7, . 4].
)
.
,
(
)
-,
,
.
,
(
)
,
[8].
. .
-,
,
«
»,
,
[5, . 19].
,
-
.
-,
,
.
,
-,
.
,
-.
,
,
,
[9].
(
)
,
,
.
,
-
,
(
).
«
» «
,
--
,
»
.
,
,
.
,
«
»
,
«
»
«
».
. .
,
,
[10, . 17].
,
,
.
-,
. .
,
«
,
,
» [11, . 625].
,
,
:
–
,
,
,
[12, . 11].
,
-,
,
,
,
.
«
»,
,
.
,
,
.
,
,
[13, . 5].
1
,
1
2002 .
,
,
,
,
,
-,
,
.
,
,
,
.
-,
,
«
» [14, . 4].
,
«…
,
,
,
,
»
[15, . 3].
,
-,
-,
.
,
.
.
,
-,
-.
1 :
-№ 197- 30 2001 . // . 2002. № 1 ( . 1). . 3.
,
-,
,
21
,
.
,
,
,
,
.
,
–
.
.
,
,
,
-,
-
.
,
-
,
«
-»,
.
,
[16].
( . 20)
–
-,
14
,
-,
-2
, –
.
,
,
,
-,
?
,
,
,
,
2 № 90- «
,
( ) »
,
-.
. .
,
«
,
,
,
» [17, . 33].
-3
,
14
18
,
.
,
-.
,
,
,
-,
.
,
–
-,
,
,
-.
,
,
,
,
,
,
[13, . 6–8].
,
-,
,
,
-,
,
,
.
,
,
,
-,
.
,
3 . :
№ 52- 30 1994 . //
. 1994. № 32. . 3301.
-.
,
. 8
(
).
. 372
(
-).
,
-:
-,
,
,
?
. 8 372
-,
,
-. 372
,
( . 4 . 8).
. 2 . 212
,
,
. 372
[17, . 33].
,
-,
-,
.
,
,
-,
.
.
:
-,
.
.
ȼɵɜɨɞɵ
-
-.
,
,
-,
,
.
,
–
,
,
-,
.
,
,
.
,
,
-.
,
-.
,
,
,
.
ɋɩɢɫɨɤ
ɥɢɬɟɪɚɬɭɪɵ
1.
. .
//
. 2005.
№
4. . 6–15.
2.
. .
--
//
. 2005.
№
1. URL: http://law.edu.ru/doc/document.
asp?docID=1208603 (
: 14.07.2015).
3.
. .
-:
//
,
. 2014.
№
1. . 68–70.
4.
. .
//
. 2000.
№
2. . 127.
5.
. .
//
. 2003.
№
10. . 16–20.
6.
. .
//
. 2008.
№
5. . 61–64.
7.
. .
:
.
-. -.:
-
:
, 2006. 239 .
8.
. .
.
-. URL: http://www-.urprofy-.ru/node/371
(
: 28.06.2015).
9.
. .
//
,
. 2014.
№
4. URL: http://politika.snauka.
ru/2014/04/1584 (
: 17.06.2015).
10.
. .
(
):
.
. ... -
.
.
, 2000. 46 .
11.
:
/
.
. .
. .
. .:
, 1997. 672 .
12.
. .
//
,
,
,
-.
. 2009.
№
1 (2). C. 10–12.
13.
:
/
.
. . .
. .:
-
- , 1999. 415 .
14.
. .
:
//
.
2004.
№
4. . 4–15.
15.
. .
:
/
. . .
, . .
. .:
,
-, 2007. 600 .
16.
. .
-,
//
. 2014.
№
12.
URL: http://vestnik-rzi.ru/2014/12/2725 (
:
14.07.2015).
17.
. .
:
-? //
. 2007.
№
3. . 33–38.
ȼɪɟɞɚɤɰɢɸɦɚɬɟɪɢɚɥɩɨɫɬɭɩɢɥ 03.03.15
© . ., 2015. « » (http://apel.ieml.ru),
15.11.2015; « ».
Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/),
, ,
, « »,
. ,
ɂɧɮɨɪɦɚɰɢɹ
ɨɛ
ɚɜɬɨɪɟ
Ⱥɥɦɚɟɜɚ
ɘɥɢɹ
Ɉɥɟɝɨɜɧɚ
,
,
-,
( .
)
: 423822, .
,
- , 67 (62/23),
.: 8-937-573-23-68
-mail: [email protected]
Ʉɚɤ
ɰɢɬɢɪɨɜɚɬɶ
ɫɬɚɬɶɸ
:
. .
//
. 2015.
№
4. . 245–252.
YU. O. ALMAYEVA,
Senior Lecturer
Institute of Economics, Management and Law (Kazan), Naberezhniye Chelny, Russia
ON THE QUALITY OF REGULATING IMPACT OF LABOR LAW IN RUSSIA
Objective: to prove that the development of the legislation quality theory in labor law is of great practical importance.
Methods: the methodological basis of research is universal dialectic method of cognition, as well as other general theoretical methods. Taking into account the impossibility to research and solve problems through the use of exclusively legal matter, the specifi c scientifi c methods were also widely used: formal-logical, comparative-legal, etc.
Results: basing on the analysis of scientifi c works on the topic, it is concluded that the integral characteristics of the labour standards quality requires consideration of not only legal, but also social, political and moral points of view. With this approach, it is logical to allocate not only legal, but also socio-political and moral quality of the labour law. It is recognized that the existing theoretical legal works on the problem of labor laws quality do not allow to speak about creation of the quality concept, development of the research methodology of labour quality standards. It is concluded that the quality of the regulatory impact of labour legislation in Russia is not always at the proper level. Moreover, among the main reasons for the imperfection of the normative base regulating social-labour relations, it is necessary to allocate objective and subjective reasons, and their "symbiosis".
Scientifi c novelty: it was found that the defi nition of the quality of the law, regulating socio-labour relations, should have an indication of properties of their components, the content of legal norms which allow to establish whether a particular law is a quality one.
Practical signifi cance: the theoretical principles formulated in the article can be used in scientifi c, legislative and law enforcement activity, educational process of higher vocational education institutions of the legal profi le, to improve the skills of practitioners and scientifi c-pedagogical staff in the fi eld of jurisprudence.
Key words: quality of labour laws; reduction of quality; labor relations; legal institution; legal norm; Labor Code of the Russian Federation; employer; employee.
References
1. Zelepukin A. A. Zakonodatel'stvo v sovremennoj pravovoj zhizni rossijskogo obshhestva (Legislation in the modern legal life of the Russian society) // Pravovaja politika i pravovaja zhizn', 2005, no. 4, pp. 6–15.
2. Suturin M. A. K voprosu o social'noj obuslovlennosti ugolovno-pravovoj normy (On the issue of the social determination of the criminal-legal norm) // Sibirskij juridicheskij vestnik, 2005, no. 1, vailable at: http://law.edu.ru/doc/document.asp?docID=1208603 (access date: 14.07.2015).
3. Maksurov A. A. Kachestvo i jeffektivnost' koordinacionnoj juridicheskoj tehnologii: obshhee i razlichija (Quality and effi ciency of coor-dinative juridical technology: general and specifi c) // Jekonomika, sociologija i pravo, 2014, no. 1, pp. 68–70.
4. Syryh E. V. O kriterijah kachestva federal'nyh zakonov v sfere jekonomiki (On the criteria of quality of federal laws in the sphere of economy) // Zhurnal rossijskogo prava, 2000, no. 2, p. 127.
5. Vlasov V. A. Problema kachestva zakona v sfere zakupok sel'skohozjajstvennoj produkcii dlja gosudarstvennyh nuzhd (Problem of quality in the sphere of purchases of agricultural products for state purposes) // Zakonodatel'stvo i jekonomika, 2003, no. 10, pp. 16–20.
6. Almaeva Ju. O. O ponjatii i kriterijah kachestva trudovogo zakonoda-tel'stva (On the notion and criteria of the quality of labor legislation) //
Jurist, 2008, no. 5, pp. 61–64.
7. Chuhvichev D. V. Zakonodatel'naja tehnika (Legislation technique): ucheb. posobie. M.: Juniti-Dana: Zakon i pravo, 2006, 239 p. 8. Almaeva Ju. O. Trudovoe zakonodatel'stvo. Nedorabotki Trudovogo kodeksa (Labor legislation. Defects of the Labor Code), vailable at: http://www.urprofy.ru/node/371 (access date: 28.06.2015).
9. Almaeva Ju. O. Nravstvennaja sostavljajushhaja trudovogo zakonodatel'stva kak pokazatel' ego kachestva (Moral component of the labor legislation as an indicator of its quality) // Politika, gosudarstvo i pravo, 2014, no. 4, vailable at: http://politika.snauka.ru/2014/04/1584 (access date: 17.06.2015).
11. Teorija gosudarstva i prava (Theory of state and law): kurs lekcij / pod red. N. I. Matuzova i A. V. Mal'ko. M.: Jurist#, 1997, 672 p. 12. Almaeva Ju. O. Teoreticheskie problemy opredelenija kachestva pravovyh norm (Theoretical issues of defi ning the quality of legal norms) //
Istoricheskie, fi losofskie, politicheskie i juridicheskie nauki, kul'turologija i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 2009, no. 1 (2), pp. 10–12. 13. Rossijskoe trudovoe pravo (Russian labor law): uchebnik dlja vuzov / otv. red. A. D. Zajkin. M.: Norma-Infra-M, 1999, 415 p.
14. Zinov'ev A. V. Osnovnye napravlenija povyshenija kachestva zakonov v Rossii: poleznye sovety deputatam chetvertogo sozyva Gosu-darstvennoj Dumy (Main directions of increasing the quality of laws in Russia: useful advice for the deputies of the fourth convocation of the State Duma) // Pravovedenie, 2004, no. 4, pp. 4–15.
15. Brilliantova N.A. Trudovoe pravo (Labor law): uchebnik / pod red. O. V. Smirnova, I.O. Snigirevoj. M.: TK Velbi, Prospekt, 2007, 600 p. 16. Almaeva Ju. O. Kachestvo rossijskogo zakonodatel'stva kak faktor, zatrudnjajushhij vypolnenie zadach podgotovki juristov (Quality of the Russian legislation as a factor hindering the execution of the lawyers training) // Kul'tura i obrazovanie, 2014 № 12, vailable at: http://vestnik-rzi. ru/2014/12/2725 (access date: 14.07.2015).
17. Hnykin G. V. Izmenenija Trudovogo kodeksa: shag vpered ili dva nazad? (Changes in the Labor Code: a step forward or two steps back-ward?) // Zakonodatel'stvo, 2007, no. 3, pp. 33–38.
Received 03.03.15
Information about the author
Almayeva Yuliya Olegovna, Senior Lecturer of the Chair of Civil and Entrepreneurship Law, Naberezhniye Chelny branch of Institute of Economics, Management and Law (Kazan)
Address: 67 (62/23) Moskovskiy Prospekt, 423822, Naberezhniye Chelny, tel.: 8-937-573-23-68 -mail: [email protected]
For citation: Almayeva Yu. O. On the quality of regulating impact of labor law in Russia // Actual Problems of Economics and Law, 2015, no. 4, pp. 245–252.
© Almayeva Yu. O., 2015. Originally published in Actual Problems of Economics and Law (http://apel.ieml.ru), 15.11.2015; Licensee Tatar Educational Centre «Taglimat». This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, fi rst published in Actual Problems of Economics and Law, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://apel.ieml.ru, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
Ⱥɡɚɪɟɧɤɨ, ɋ. Ⱥ.
Ɍɨɩɨɥɨɝɢɢɫɨɨɛɳɟɫɬɜɚ/ . . ; ,
( . ). – : - « » , , 2014. – 228 .
-,
-.
-,
.
, , ,