www.revportpneumol.org
ORIGINAL
ARTICLE
Implementation
of
a
guideline
for
physical
therapy
in
the
postoperative
period
of
upper
abdominal
surgery
reduces
the
incidence
of
atelectasis
and
length
of
hospital
stay
S.
Souza
Possa
a,b,
C.
Braga
Amador
a,
A.
Meira
Costa
a,
E.
Takahama
Sakamoto
a,
C.
Seiko
Kondo
a,c,
A.L.
Maida
Vasconcellos
a,d,
C.M.
Moran
de
Brito
a,
W.
Pereira
Yamaguti
a,∗aRehabilitationService,HospitalSírio-Libanês,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil bSchoolofMedicine,UniversityofSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,Brazil
cRehabilitationService,FederalUniversityofSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,Brazil dPhysicalTherapyService,HospitalSírio-Libanês,SãoPaulo,Brazil
Received24April2013;accepted16July2013 Availableonline27November2013
KEYWORDS
Physicaltherapy modalities; Earlyambulation; Guideline; Pulmonary atelectasis; Hospitalization; Postoperativecare
Abstract
Objective: Theaimofthisstudywastoevaluatetheeffectivenessofimplementinga physi-caltherapyguidelineforpatientsundergoingupperabdominalsurgery(UAS)inreducingthe incidenceofatelectasisandlengthofhospitalstayinthepostoperativeperiod.
Materialsandmethods: A‘‘beforeandafter’’studydesignwithhistoricalcontrolwasused. The‘‘before’’periodincludedconsecutivepatientswhounderwentUASbeforeguideline imple-mentation(intervention). The‘‘after’’period includedconsecutive patients afterguideline implementation.Patientsinthepre-interventionperiodweresubmittedtoaprogramof phys-icaltherapyinwhichthetreatmentplanningwasbasedontheindividualexperienceofeach professional.Ontheotherhand,patients whowereincludedinthepost-interventionperiod underwentastandardizedprogramofphysicaltherapywithafocusontheuseofadditional strategies(EPAP,incentivespirometryandearlymobilization).
Results:Therewasasignificantincreaseintheuseofincentivespirometryandpositive expi-ratoryairwaypressureafterguidelineimplementation.Moreover, itwasobservedthatearly ambulationoccurredinallpatients inthepost-interventionperiod.Nopatientwhoadhered totallytotheguidelineinthepost-interventionperioddevelopedatelectasis.Individualsinthe post-interventionperiodpresentedashorterlengthofhospitalstay(9.2±4.1days)compared topatientsinthepre-interventionperiod(12.1±8.3days)(p<0.05).
∗Correspondingauthor.
E-mailaddresses:wellington.psyamaguti@hsl.org.br,wellpsy@yahoo.com.br(W.PereiraYamaguti).
Conclusion:TheimplementationofaphysicaltherapyguidelineforpatientsundergoingUAS resultedinreduced incidenceofatelectasisand reductioninlengthofhospital stayinthe postoperativeperiod.
© 2013SociedadePortuguesa dePneumologia. Publishedby Elsevier España,S.L.All rights reserved.
PALAVRAS-CHAVE
Modalidadesde fisioterapia; Deambulac¸ão precoce; Orientac¸ão; Atelectasia pulmonar; Internamento; Cuidados pós-operatórios
Aimplementac¸ãodeumadiretrizparaafisioterapianoperíodopós-operatórioda cirurgiaabdominalalta,reduzaincidênciadeatelectasiaeotempodeinternamento
Resumo
Objetivo:O objetivodeste estudo foi avaliaraeficácia daimplementac¸ãode uma diretriz defisioterapia para doentessubmetidos acirurgia abdominalsuperior (UAS) nareduc¸ãoda incidênciadeatelectasiaenotempodeinternamentonopós-operatório.
MateriaiseMétodos: Foi usado um desenho de estudo de ‘‘antes e depois com controlo histórico.Operíodo‘‘antes’’incluiudoentesconsecutivosqueforamsubmetidosaUASantes daimplementac¸ãodadiretriz(intervenc¸ão).Operíodo‘‘depois’’incluiudoentesconsecutivos apósaimplementac¸ãodadiretriz.Osdoentesnoperíodo pré-intervenc¸ãoforamsubmetidos aumprogramadefisioterapiaondeoplaneamentodotratamentofoibaseadonaexperiência individualdecadaprofissional.Poroutrolado,osdoentesqueforamincluídosnoperíodo pós-intervenc¸ãoforamsubmetidosaumprogramapadronizadodefisioterapiacomumfoconouso deestratégiasadicionais(EPAP,espirometriadeincentivoemobilizac¸ãoprecoce).
Resultados: Ocorreuumaumentosignificativodousodeespirometriadeincentivoepressão expiratóriapositivanasviasaéreasapósaimplementac¸ãodasdiretrizes.Alémdisso, observou-sequeocorreuolevantamentoprecoceemtodososdoentesduranteoperíodopós-intervenc¸ão. Nenhum doente que aderiu totalmente à diretriz no período pós-intervenc¸ão desenvolveu atelectasia.Osindivíduosnoperíodopós-intervenc¸ãoapresentaramummenortempode inter-namentohospitalar(9.2±4.1dias)emcomparac¸ãocomosdoentesnoperíodopré-intervenc¸ão (12.1±8.3dias)(p<0.05).
Conclusão:Aimplementac¸ãodeumadiretrizdefisioterapiaparadoentessubmetidos aUAS resultounareduc¸ãodaincidênciadeatelectasiaenareduc¸ãodotempodeinternamentono pós-operatório.
©2013SociedadePortuguesa dePneumologia.Publicado porElsevier España,S.L.Todosos direitosreservados.
Introduction
Postoperativepulmonarycomplications(PPCs)arecommon inpatients undergoingabdominalsurgery andare respon-siblefor the increasedmorbidityand mortalityaswell as lengthof hospitalstay andhealth relatedcost of care.1,2 ThePPCsoccurmorefrequentlyinsurgerieswherethe inci-sionis madeabovetheumbilical scar,thesocalledupper abdominalsurgeries(UAS).3TheincidenceofPPCsinthese subjectsisrelatedtotheexistenceofpreoperativerisk fac-torssuchasadvancedage,smoking,malnutrition,obesity, lungdiseases,andclinicaldiseases.Surgicalandanesthetic factorssuchasthetimeofsurgery,typeofsurgery,andthe effectsof anestheticdrugs ontherespiratory system also contributetothedevelopmentofPPCs.4
Atelectasis, pneumonia, acute respiratory failure, tracheobronchitis, wheezing, and prolonged mechanical ventilation are the most commonly observed PPCs.2 It is knownthat the decrease in lung volumes and capacities, abnormal respiratory pattern, abnormal gas exchange, andpulmonary defensesin patients undergoing open UAS start with anesthetic induction and perpetuate in the postoperative period, contributing to the occurrence of
thesePPCs.5,6 Therespiratory muscledysfunctionhasalso been attributed to the development of PPCs.7,8 Multiple factors may be involved in diaphragmatic dysfunction, suchasirritationandinflammationcausedbytraumafrom manipulation close to the diaphragm, reflex inhibition of afferentabdominalreceptors,andpostoperativepain.7
Themainobjectiveofthepresentstudywastoevaluate theeffectivenessoftheimplementationofaguidelinefor physicaltherapyassistanceforpatientsundergoingelective openUASinreducingtheincidenceofatelectasisandlength ofhospitalstayinthepostoperativeperiod.
Materials
and
methods
The study was conducted in a private and tertiary care center of 497 beds in the state of São Paulo, Brazil. We analyzeddatafrompatients hospitalizedin intensivecare units,semi-intensiveunits,andwards.The studyincluded adult patients (age≥18 years) undergoing elective open UASandwhoreceivedphysicaltherapyinthepostoperative period. It excluded patients undergoing lower abdomi-nalsurgeries,laparoscopicsurgeries,emergencysurgeries, surgeries with associated chest manipulation, those who underwent more than one surgical procedure during hos-pitalization, patients whodid not adhere properlyto the physical therapy treatment (performing physical therapy attendances <75% of scheduled therapy), patients who initiatedinpatientphysicaltherapybeforethesurgery (pre-operative physical therapy), individuals who died during hospitalization,andpatientsrequiringinvasivemechanical ventilationover24hours.
We used a ‘‘before and after’’model of retrospective studywithhistoricalcontrol.15,16The‘‘before’’period (pre-intervention)included allconsecutive patientsundergoing electiveopenUASwhometthecriteriaforinclusioninthe studyoversixmonths(fromJulytoDecember2010)before guidelineimplementation(intervention).Teamsofphysical therapistswere trainedinthe standardization ofthe new modelofcareduringthemonthofJanuary2011.Duringthis period,nodataofpatientsundergoingUASwerecollected. The‘‘after’’period(post-intervention)includedall consec-utive patientswhomet theinclusioncriteriaof thestudy duringthesixmonthsafterguidelineimplementation(from FebruarytoJuly2011).
A training program for guideline implementation was carried out by the area of Continuing Education of the Rehabilitation Service of the institution for a period of 30days.Fifteen trainingmeetingswerearrangedinsmall groups for all the 126 physical therapists of the institu-tion, acting in intensive care units, semi-intensive units, and wards, in relation tothe guideline. During the train-ing sessions, we presented flow diagrams for treatment, the standardization of approaches of treatment, orienta-tions for hospital discharge, and the scientific evidence thatsupported theelaborationof theguidelines. Further-more,thetrainingaimedtoguideprofessionalsintheuseof physicaltherapyresourcesrecommendedinthecaremodel (i.e.incentivespirometryandpositive expiratorypressure intheairways).Todisseminatetheguideline,printedcopies of the document in the operatingunits were distributed, in addition to providing the electronic file in the com-puterizedsystem of theinstitution for consultations. This materialcontains informationabout care flowcharts, indi-cationsandcontraindications,criteriafordiscontinuingthe program,resourcesandfrequencyofphysicaltherapy ses-sions(Fig.1).The documentpresentedatotalof11pages includingflowcharts.
Patients included in the study in the pre-intervention period(control group) underwenta program of postoper-ativephysicaltherapy treatmentin whichthetherapeutic planningtobeappliedwasdeterminedbytheprofessional providing patient care (non-standard model). In con-trast,patientswhowereincluded inthepost-intervention (intervention group) underwent a standardized program ofphysicaltherapytreatmentwhichstructuredthemodelof patientcare, focusing onthe use of additional therapeu-ticresources(volumetricincentivespirometryandpositive expiratorypressure in theairways),17,18 early sitting posi-tionandambulation(onset<48hafter surgery)19 (Fig.1). Patientsundergoingtheprogrampreconizedbythe guide-lineshouldundergoatleasttwosessionsofphysicaltherapy dailyuntilthe5thpostoperativeday.13 Therapeutic treat-mentwas discussed again andre-planned by theteam of physicaltherapistsafterthe5thpostoperativeday,to rede-finetheneedfortwosessionsdaily.
Inthepresentstudy,totaladhesiontotheguidelinewas definedbytheuseofallthefeaturesrecommendedinthe guideline. When one of theresources was not applied,it wasconsideredpartialcompliance,andwhentwoormore featureswerenotused,itwasconsideredasnon-adherence totheguideline.
Datawerecollectedfromtheanalysisofmedicalrecords and electronic database of the hospital. The information extractedfromthesesourceswasstoredinelectronic for-matpreviouslydesigned for this study.We collecteddata concerningcharacterization of each patient(medical his-tory,demographics,clinicalandanthropometricdata),the surgical procedure (type of surgery, surgical technique, surgical time, and surgical risk), and the physical ther-apy assistanceprovided to patients duringhospitalization (features used and treatment adherence). Regarding the outcomesinvestigated,theincidenceofatelectasiswas con-sideredastheprimaryvariableand thelengthofhospital stayasthesecondaryvariable.
Thediagnosisofatelectasiswasconsideredinthe pres-ence of imaging studies confirming this alteration. All patients included in the study, both in the control group (CG)and in theintervention group (IG),had radiographic evaluationfromthefirsttofifthpostoperativeday.We con-sideredonlythepresenceofpureatelectasis(notassociated withothercomplicationssuchaspleuraleffusionor pneu-mothorax)sincetheaimofthestudywastodeterminethe incidenceofatelectasissecondaryonlytothesurgery,and nottoothercomplications.Radiologistswhohadreadallthe examinationsdidnotknowthestudyobjectives.We consid-eredaspossibleriskfactorsfordevelopingatelectasis:age, femalegender,highbodymassindex(BMI),lungdisease, his-toryofsmoking,hypertension,diabetes,dyslipidemia,heart disease,cancer,typeofsurgery,surgicaltechnique,timeof surgery,andsurgicalrisk(AmericanSocietyof Anesthesiol-ogistsscale).
Patients undergoing open UAS (Intervention group)
Yes
Yes
Yes
No No
Yes
Angina, arrhythmias, shock or axillary temperature >38ºC
Physiotherapeutic program contraindicated
Start/Restart the physiotherapeutic program
after resolution of the contraindication
Awake and collaborative, hemodinamically stable,
without dyspnea at reat pain <8 on the numerical scale
Immediate postoperative day: patient in bed (bedside to 45º)
CP + IS + EPAP
VTE, Hb <7 g/dl or platelets <20.000mm3
1st postoperative day: patient seated in chair previous conducts + free motor PT
+ ambulation of at least 5 meters
2nd postoperative day: patient seated in chair previous conducts + ambulation of
at least 15 meters
Motor physical therapy and/or ambulation
contraindicated
Stard/Restart motor physical therapy and/or ambulation
after resolution of the contraindication or medical
release
3rd to 5th postoperative day: previous conducts + exercises in
orthostatism + ambulation of at least 30 meters
Yes
Yes
Figure1 Physical therapyprogram for patients undergoing open upperabdominal surgery (interventiongroup). UAS: upper abdominalsurgery;CP:chestphysicaltherapy; IS:incentivespirometry;EPAP:expiratorypositiveairwaypressure;VTE:venous thromboembolism;Hb:hemoglobin.
determined to be 66 patients for each group. To reach thisnumber, we calculated that we needed 6 months for thepost-interventionperiod.Forthefinalanalysis,a sen-sitive analysis was performed including only the patients withfull adherence to the guideline aswell as an analy-sisofallpatientsincludedinthepost-interventionperiod. Categoricalvariablesarepresentedasfrequency,whereas continuous variables are expressed as mean±standard deviation. Comparisons between groups were made by Mann---Whitney test (nonparametric data), in the case of numericalvariables,andbythechi-squaretestinthecase ofcategorical variables.The level of significancewas5%. Statisticalanalysiswasperformedusingthestatistical pro-gramSigmaPlot11.0(SystatSoftwareInc.,CA,USA).
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of thehospital(Registrationnumber:HSL2010-58).Therewas waiver shall of the Consent Form, because it is a retro-spective observational study analyzing standardization of institutionalcareprocess.
Results
We analyzed medical records of 535 patients undergoing UASinthe totalperiodof thestudy,249belongingtothe stagepriortoguidelineimplementationand286belonging tothesubsequentstage.Afterevaluationofinclusionand exclusioncriteria, 202wereeligibleforthestudy.TheCG consistedof133patientsandtheIGof69patients(Fig.2). Of the patients included in the IG, 32 (46.4%) had total adherence tothe guideline, whereas37 (53.6%) had par-tialadherencetotheguideline(didnotundergooneofthe additionaltherapeuticresourcesintheproposedguideline).
Patients undergoing open UAS in the total period of the stu day
n=535
Control group (per-guideline)
n=286 Intervention group
(post-guideline)
n=249
116 medical records excluded 217 medical records excluded
• More than one surgical procedure during hospitalization (n=53)
• More than one surgical procedure during hospitalization (n=40)
• Laparoscopic surgery (n=40) • Lack of adherence to physical therapy treatment (n=5)
• Lower abdominal surgery (n=3) • Death (n=4)
• Emergency surgery (n=3) • Preoperative physiotherapy (n=3) • Chest manipulation associated with the abdominal surgery (n=4) • Mechanical ventilation >24 hours (n=1)
Patients included n=133
Patients included n=69
Total adhesion n=32
Partial adhesion n=37 • Laparoscopic surgery (n=59)
• Lack of adherence to physical therapy treatment (n=14)
• Lower abdominal surgery (n=14) • Death (n=3)
• Lack of adherence to the guideline (n=54)
• Emergency surgery (n=16) • Preoperative physiotherapy (n=4) • Chest manipulation associated with the abdominal surgery (n=8) • Mechanical ventilation >24 hours (n=5)
Figure2 FlowchartforinclusionandexclusionofpatientsinthestudyfortheCG(pre-guideline)andIG(post-guideline).
Table1 Demographicandclinicalcharacteristicsofindividualsincludedinthestudy.
Characteristic Controlgroup(n=133) Interventiongroup(n=32) p-Value
Gender(male:female) 57:76 22:10 0.008a
Age(years) 59.9±15.2 57.1±15.8 0.44
BMI(kg/m2) 26.1±0.5 26.1±0.7 0.58
Respiratorydisease 12(9%) 0(0%) 0.08
Tobaccohistory 10(7.5%) 7(21.2%) 0.02a
Hypertension 49(36.8%) 9(28.1%) 0.35
Diabetes 20(15%) 2(6.3%) 0.19
Dyslipidemia 16(12%) 4(12.5%) 0.94
Heartdisease 24(18%) 3(2.3%) 0.23
Neoplasia 121(91%) 26(81.2%) 0.11
Typeofsurgery
Tumorresection 114(85.7%) 24(75%) 0.14
Othercauses 19(14.3%) 8(25%)
Surgicaltechnique
Median 57(42.9%) 10(31.2%)
Subcostal+median 44(33.1%) 11(34.4%) 0.38
Subcostal 32(24.1%) 11(34.4%)
Timeofsurgery(min) 427±249.9 369.8±146.7 0.49
ASAscale
Lowrisk(1---2) 106(89.8%) 25(86.2%) 0.57
Highrisk(3) 12(10.2%) 4(13.8%)
Table2 Frequency ofuseofdifferenttherapeuticresources andclinicaloutcomes(incidenceofatelectasisandlengthof hospitalstay).
Resourcesandclinicaloutcomes Controlgroup(n=133) Interventiongroup(n=32) p-Value
Conventionalphysicaltherapy 133(100%) 32(100%)
Incentivespirometry 88(66.2%) 32(100%) <0.001a
EPAP 0(0%) 32(100%) <0.001a
Earlyambulation(<48h) 16(12%) 32(100%) <0.001a
Incidenceofatelectasis(%) 21(15.8%) 0(0%) <0.001a
Hospitalstay(days) 12.1±8.3 9.2±4.1 0.036a
EPAP:expiratorypositiveairwaypressure.
aStatisticallysignificantdifferencebetweengroups.
Table3 describes possiblerisk factors forthe develop-mentofatelectasis.ThesedataarerelatedonlytotheCG, sincetherewasnodevelopmentofatelectasisintheIG.In thepresentstudy,theonlyriskfactor associatedwiththe developmentofatelectasiswasthesurgicaltechnique.The individualsundergoingsubcostalincisionsweremorelikely todevelopthiscomplication(p<0.05).
Discussion
Thepresent studyshowedthattheoptimizationand stan-dardizationof theuse ofadditionaltherapeutic resources throughtheimplementationofaguidelineforphysical ther-apyassistance,guidingthecareofpatientsundergoingUAS,
is effective in reducing the incidence of atelectasis and lengthofhospitalstayinthepostoperativeperiod.
Previous studies have reported that the incidence of atelectasis observed in thepostoperative periodcan vary from6%to42%.21,22In thepresentstudy,theincidenceof atelectasisamongtheCGpatients(pre-interventionperiod) was15.8%,whichisconsistentwiththesepreviousreports. The optimization of physical therapy treatment in the IG (post-intervention)reducedtheincidenceofatelectasisto 0%inthosepatientswhoadheredtotallytotheguideline, highlighting the importance of the adequacy of physical therapy in the postoperative care. The intention-to-treat analysis(including37patientswhoadheredpartiallytothe guideline)didnotshowastatisticallysignificantdifference in the rate of atelectasis or length of hospitalstay when
Table3 Possibleriskfactorsassociatedwiththedevelopmentofatelectasis.
Characteristic Withatelectasis(n=21) Withoutatelectasis(n=112) p-Value
Gender(male:female) 11:10 65:47 0.63
Age(years) 63.1±13.5 59.2±15.5 0.27
BMI(kg/m2) 26.9±4.4 26.5±5.5 0.14
Respiratorydisease 3(14.3%) 9(8%) 0.36
Tobaccohistory 3(14.3%) 7(6.2%) 0.2
Hypertension 8(38%) 41(36.6%) 0.9
Diabetes 3(14.3%) 17(15.2%) 0.92
Dyslipidemia 2(9.5%) 14(12.5%) 0.7
Heartdisease 5(23.8%) 19(17%) 0.45
Neoplasia 18(85.7%) 95(84.8%) 0.92
Typeofsurgery
Tumorresection 18(85.7%) 96(85.7%) 1
Othercauses 3(14.3%) 16(14.3%)
Surgicaltechnique
Median 5(23.8%) 52(46.4%)
Subcostal+median 5(23.8%) 39(34.8%) 0.004a
Subcostal 11(52.4%) 21(18.8%)
Timeofsurgery(min) 474±306.3 419.7±239 0.68
ASAscale
Lowrisk(1---2) 16(76.2%) 90(90.9%) 0.38
Highrisk(3) 3(15.8%) 9(9.1%)
Lateambulation 10(47.6%) 33(29.5%) 0.12
comparedto theCG. This finding reinforcesthe need for totaladherenceoftheinterventionpackagesforthe clini-caloutcomestobeachieved.AlthoughtheITTanalysisdid notdemonstrateastatisticallysignificantdifferenceforthe lengthof hospitalstay,areductionofupto48h in hospi-talizationcanbeconsideredclinicallyrelevantandcanbe associatedwithareductioninhealthcarecosts.In associa-tionwiththesefindings,itwasalsoobservedthatthelength ofhospitalizationwashigheramongpatientswhodeveloped atelectasis.Thelongerlengthof stayamongpatientswho developpulmonarycomplicationsisacommonfindinginthe literature.2
Althoughphysicaltherapyassistanceisroutinelyusedin theprocessesoffunctionalrehabilitationofpatients under-goingUAS,11 theresults demonstratingitseffectivenessin preventingatelectasisarestillinconsistent.13 Theabsence of consolidated scientific evidence can leadthe therapist tocarrytheir professionalpracticeusingclinicaldecisions based on their own experience, which results in a wide rangeofcarepracticesinaservice.23Standardizingpractical approachesbecomesnecessarytohelpteamstomake the mostappropriatedecision,favoringtheclinicaloutcomesof patients.Inthiscontext,thedevelopmentofcareguidelines has been widely used in theroutine in different fieldsof medicalactivity,15,16 providingpractical recommendations whenscientificevidenceisstilllimitedorquestionable.23
Therapeutic resources such as incentive spirometry, CPAP, EPAP, early mobilization, and conventional physi-caltherapy,basedondeepbreathingexercises,areoften used toprevent atelectasisin patients undergoingUAS.24 Among these commonly used features, incentive spirom-etry appears to be involved in more controversy. Recent systematic reviews have found noevidence regarding the effectivenessoftheuseofincentivespirometryfor prevent-ingpulmonarycomplicationsinthepostoperativeperiodof UAS.25,26 However, many of the studies investigating the effectiveness of this device still present methodological flaws,makingtheelaborationofmorerigorousstudies nec-essary to define the realbenefits of the use of incentive spirometry. Despite these inconsistent results, the latest recommendations on the use of incentive spirometry in preventingpostoperativepulmonarycomplicationsindicate that this feature should be applied in combination with deepbreathingtechniques,assistedcough,early mobiliza-tion,and optimizedanalgesia toobtain betterpreventive results.27 In the present study, incentive spirometry was usedin combination withother techniques recommended forpostoperative,whichprobablycontributedtothe reduc-tionoftheincidenceofatelectasis.
Anotherfeaturepreconizedforprophylaxisofatelectasis inpatientsundergoingUASistheuseofbreathingexercises associated with positive pressure through EPAP or CPAP.9 Although the use of CPAP is a strategy recommended for prophylaxisofatelectasisforUAS,9itsapplicationinclinical practiceisquitelimitedbytheriskofabdominaldistension related to aerophagia, which can be particularly harmful intheoccurrenceoffistulasor anastomosisleakage. Rick-stenetal.18 havedemonstratedthatboththeuseofCPAP andEPAPwereeffectiveinpreservinglungvolumesand pre-ventingthedevelopmentofatelectasisinthepostoperative period of abdominalsurgeries, and that the use of these resourcesweresuperiortodeepbreathingexercises.Other
authorshavealsodemonstratedthatEPAPisaseffectiveas CPAPforthepreventionofPPCsafterthoracicsurgeryand shouldbeusedconcomitantlywithconventionalrespiratory physicaltherapy.28,29Inthepresentstudy,itwasfoundthat intheperiodbeforeguidelineimplementationEPAPwasnot astrategyusedinroutine.Inthepost-interventionperiod, EPAPwas usedin all patients who adhered tothe guide-line.Thereductionintherateofatelectasismayhavebeen largelyexplainedasaresultoftheinclusionofthisfeature inclinicalpractice.
Finally,earlymobilizationwasanotherimportantfeature recommendedintheapproachofpatientsundergoingopen UASafterguidelineimplementation.Itisbelievedthatearly mobilizationresultsin increasedlungvolume,with conse-quentpreventionofatelectasis.30Brasheretal.31haveeven suggestedthatearlymobilizationseemstobemore effec-tive than deep breathing exercises for the prevention of PPCs. These findings further emphasize the importance ofearlymobilizationinthepostoperativeperiodforUAS.
Risk factors such as age over 60, smoking history, presence of chronic lung disease and surgical time over 210min areoften relatedtotheoccurrenceof pulmonary complications in the postoperative period of open UAS.4 Interestingly,theonlyriskfactorassociatedwiththe devel-opmentofatelectasis,inthepresentstudy,wasthesurgical technique,withpatientsundergoingsubcostalincisions pre-sentinghigherincidenceofcomplications.Therelationship between subcostal incisions and the development of pul-monary complications after abdominal surgery has been previouslydemonstrated.3
Themain limitationofthepresent studyrelatestothe methodological design. Although the use of a historical controlhinders theestablishment of a causalassociation, itsapplication inan institutionalcontextbecomesamore viablealternative.It shouldalsobenotedthatthe imple-mentationoftheguidelinewastheonlychangeincorporated into the care of these patients during the study period. Anotherfactorworthmentioningisthefactthatradiological assessorswereblindedtothestudyobjectivesensuringthe reliabilityofthediagnosisofatelectasis(primaryvariable). Moreover,theshorttimebetweenthehistoricalcontroland the intervention period strengthens the assumption of a trueassociationbetweentheinterventionsandtheobserved outcomes. Another limitation of the present study was thedifferenceinthesamplesizeofpatientsundergoingthe guidelineinthe post-intervention periodcomparedtothe pre-interventionperiod.Itwasobservedthatthereduction inthenumberofpatientsincludedinthepost-intervention periodwasmainlyfor theaccuracy oftheselection crite-riaandapoor adherencetotheguideline bythe physical therapists.However,pooradherenceinperiodsimmediately aftertheimplementationofhealthcareguidelineswasalso observedinprevious studies.15,32 Thisfactemphasizesthe needforcontinuingeducationworkfortheconsolidationof long-termprocesses.
Conclusions
todemonstratethatthephysiotherapeuticapproachbased onpackagesofinterventionsresultedinreducedincidence of atelectasis and reduced length of hospital stay among patientsundergoingelectiveopen UAS.Theverificationof these favorable outcomes strengthens initiatives for the developmentof otherphysical therapy practicesbasedon managedguidelines,providingfoundationfortheawareness of the teams on the importance of following these care models.
Ethical
disclosures
Protection of human and animal subjects.The authors declarethat the proceduresfollowed were in accordance withtheregulationsoftherelevantclinicalresearchethics committeeandwiththoseoftheCodeofEthicsoftheWorld MedicalAssociation(DeclarationofHelsinki).
Confidentialityofdata.Theauthorsdeclarethattheyhave followedtheprotocolsoftheirworkcenteronthe publica-tionofpatientdataandthatallthepatientsincludedinthe studyreceivedsufficientinformationandgavetheirwritten informedconsenttoparticipateinthestudy.
Righttoprivacyandinformedconsent.Theauthorshave obtainedthe written informed consentof the patients or subjectsmentionedinthearticle.Thecorrespondingauthor isinpossessionofthisdocument.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorshavenoconflictsofinteresttodeclare.
References
1.Serejo LG, da Silva-Júnior FP, Bastos JP, de Bruin GS, Mota RM, de Bruin PF. Risk factors for pul-monary complications after emergency abdominal surgery. RespirMed.2007;101:808---13.
2.Dimick JB, Chen SL, Taheri PA, Henderson WG, Khuri SF, Campbell Jr DA. Hospital costs associated with surgical complications: a report from the private-sector National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. J Am Coll Surg. 2004;199:531---7.
3.DureuilB,CantineauJP,DesmontsJM.Effectsofupperorlower abdominal.Surgeryondiaphragmaticfunction.Br JAnaesth. 1987;59:1230---5.
4.Brooks-Brunn JA. Predictors of postoperative pulmonary complications following abdominal surgery. Chest. 1997;111:564---71.
5.WarnerDO.Preventingpostoperativepulmonarycomplications: the role of the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology. 2000;92: 1467---72.
6.Paisani DM, Chiavegato LD, Faresin SM. Lung volumes, lung capacities and respiratory muscle strength following gastro-plasty.JBrasPneumol.2005;32:125---32.
7.Vassilakopoulos T, Mastora Z, Katsaounou P, Doukas G, KlimopoulosS,RoussosC,etal.Contributionofpainto inspi-ratory muscle dysfunction after upper abdominal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;1614Pt1:1372---5.
8.Bellinetti LM, Thomson JC. Respiratory muscle evaluation in elective thoracotomies and laparotomies of the upper abdomen.JBrasPneumol.2006;32:99---105.
9.FerreyraGP,BaussanoI,SquadroneV,RichiardiL,MarchiaroG, Del Sorbo L, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of respiratory complications after abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2008;247:617---26.
10.SantoCC,Gonc¸alvesMT,PiccoloMM,LimaS,RosaGJ,PaulinE, etal.Physicaltherapyperformance inrespiratoryand motor involvement during postoperative in children submitted to abdominalsurgeries.ActaMedPort.2011;24:1013---8. 11.ManzanoRM,CarvalhoCR, Saraiva-Romanholo BM,VieiraJE.
Chestphysicaltherapyduringimmediatepostoperativeperiod amongpatientsundergoingupperabdominalsurgery: random-izedclinicaltrial.SaoPauloMedJ.2008;126:269---73. 12.Lawrence VA, Cornell JE, Smetana GW. American College
of Physicians Strategies to reduce postoperative pulmonary complications after noncardiothoracic surgery: systematic reviewfortheAmericanCollegeofPhysicians.AnnInternMed. 2006;144:596---608.
13.Pasquina P, Tramèr MR, Granier JM, Walder B. Respiratory physical therapy to prevent pulmonary complications after abdominal surgery: a systematic review. Chest. 2006;130: 1887---99.
14.GramsST,OnoLM,NoronhaMA,SchivinskiCI,PaulinE. Breath-ingexercisesinupperabdominalsurgery:asystematicreview andmeta-analysis.RevBrasFisioter.2012;16:345---53. 15.Ferrer R, Artigas A, Levy MM, Blanco J, González-Díaz G,
Garnacho-MonteroJ,etal.,EdusepsisStudyGroup. Improve-mentinprocessofcareandoutcomeafteramulticentersevere sepsiseducationalprograminSpain.JAMA.2008;299:2294---303. 16.NeryP,PastoreL,CarvalhoCR,SchettinoG.Shortening ventila-torysupportwithaprotocolbasedondailyextubationscreening andnoninvasive ventilationinselected patients.Clinics(Sao Paulo).2011;66:759---66.
17.Yamaguti WP, Sakamoto ET, Panazzolo D, Peixoto C, da C, CerriGG,etal.Diaphragmaticmobilityinhealthysubjects dur-ingincentivespirometrywithaflow-orienteddeviceandwith avolume-orienteddevice.JBrasPneumol.2010;36:738---45. 18.RickstenSE,Bengtsson A, Soderberg C,Thorden M,Kvist H.
Effectsofperiodicpositiveairwaypressurebymaskon post-operativepulmonaryfunction.Chest.1986;89:774---81. 19.BrowningL,DenehyL,ScholesRL.Thequantityofearlyupright
mobilizationperformed followingupperabdominalsurgery is low:anobservationalstudy.AustJPhysiother.2007;53:47---52. 20.Denehy L, Carroll S, Ntoumenopoulos G, Jenkins S. A ran-domizedcontrolled trialcomparingperiodicmask CPAPwith physiotherapy after abdominal surgery. Physiother Res Int. 2001;6:236---50.
21.StockMC,DownsJB,GauerPK,AlsterJM,ImreyPB.Prevention ofpostoperativepulmonarycomplicationswithCPAP,incentive spirometry,andconservativetherapy.Chest.1985;87:151---7. 22.Denehy L, Carroll S, Ntoumenopoulos G, Jenkins S. A
ran-domizedcontrolled trialcomparingperiodicmask CPAPwith physicaltherapyafterabdominalsurgery.PhysiotherResInt. 2001;6:236---50.
23.MorrisAH.Treatmentalgorithmsprotocolizedcare.CurrOpin CritCare.2003;9:236---40.
24.Hanekom SD, Brooks D, Denehy L, Fagevik-Olsén M, HardcastleTC, Manie S, et al. Reaching consensus on the physiotherapeutic management of patients following upper abdominalsurgery:apragmaticapproachtointerpretequivocal evidence.BMCMedInformDecisMak.2012;12:5.
26.Carvalho CR, Paisani DM, Lunardi AC. Incentive spirometry in major surgeries: a systematic review. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15:343---50.
27.Restrepo RD, Wettstein R, Wittnebel L, Tracy M. Incentive spirometry.RespirCare.2011;56:1600---4.
28.IngwersenUM,LarsenKR,BertelsenMT,Kiil-NielsenK,LaubM, SandermannJ,etal.Threedifferentmaskphysiotherapy regi-mensforpreventionofpost-operativepulmonarycomplications after heart and pulmonary surgery. Intensive Care Med. 1993;19:294---8.
29.Fagevik Olsén M, Wennberg E, Johnsson E, Josefson K, LönrothH, LundellL.Randomizedclinicalstudyofthe preven-tionofpulmonarycomplicationsafterthoracoabdominal resec-tionbytwodifferentbreathingtechniques.BrJSurg.2002;89: 1228---34.
30.ZafiropoulosB,AlisonJA,McCarrenB.Physiologicalresponses to the early mobilisation of the intubated, ventilated abdominal surgery patient. Aust J Physiother. 2004;50: 95---100.
31.Brasher PA,McClelland KH,Denehy L, Story I.Does removal ofdeepbreathingexercisesfroma physicaltherapy program includingpre-operativeeducationandearlymobilisationafter cardiac surgery alter patient outcomes? Aust J Physiother. 2003;49:165---73.