• Nenhum resultado encontrado

The effect of guia exame’s ratings on the Brazilian fund industry: an analysis of net-worth flows

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "The effect of guia exame’s ratings on the Brazilian fund industry: an analysis of net-worth flows"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texto

(1)

!

"

!

#

"

$

% &$'

$ % &$'

' ())*

'

!

" #

! $

% " & '(((#'(()

* ! " &

"

% "

+ , - .. .) '(

(2)

Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1435293

Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1435293

2

$

0 .112 ! .2( (((

# " 3

!

" 0

#! 4 56

"

%

% ! " 3

7 % 8#

# " 3

% ! ! #

9 ! "

9

% ! "

! " 3

!

* "

& !

: ; : < = < 3 !

0 < 3 !

" 0

! ! %

: % '((.

" & !

(3)

3

$

+

&

! " ! % > ,

: % .11? # "

" 0

% ! %

/! % .11( " ! % !

% : .111 :

" 9 ! % !

: #

! : "

9 @

!

! " 0

! % ! # "

! ! !

0 ! :

! % " :

! #! "

% '((. # A ABB $

C .112 D .111 :

! ! 8# !

! ! ! "

: '((A :

%# % "

8#

" 3 8#

(4)

4 8# "

! ! % %

E !

: %

"

$

,

-

.

'((. '(()

% .112" 3 !

'((.

-#! " 3 .((( !

! % ! !

"

0C 3F !

"

$

! ! $

! 9 " 3

! # !

$ #

" G ! !

" : ! A(

"

< $

"

0C 3F E C 0 3 % .'

! ! $

-." 3 7

'" 3 <3< < 3 < !

" <0>

! <3<

(5)

5

A" 3 7

)" 3 # #!

7

8" C #! ! 9 %

! "

3 0C 3F

! ! " 6 $

-6 4 6 .11) $ " %

3 DH 6I0 6J I 6 % 3 3 K 6J I 6 %

3 I 0K#B(( 4 56 >F3

% ! % "

% .(L

.8L !

% '8L " 0 ! 6 4

"

D ! " &

- $ # %

" C !

! ! #

$ !

! ! " &

!

-." 6 % < > $ # %

7

'" 6 % 0 : 4M.8 ! 4M.8 4M8(

! 4M8( 4M8(( 4M8(( " 7

A" 6 % < 6 4M.8 ! 4M.8 4M8( !

4M8( 4M8(( 4M8(( < > 7

)" 6 % < > - !

(6)

6

&$

/

3 ! %

#! %

" & !

! " !

9 "

* ! ! !

! # # "

! - ! !

# ! !

! "

0 F! '((. !

! ! !

! " ! ! !

% %

" 3 ! %

" $ ! !

! ! ! "

! ! ! # ! ! !

! " 0 > , : %

.11? #

-N (""" . ! !7

N .""" ' ! !7

N '""" A # !

!-0$ & " " $

3 ! ! ! % %

(7)

7

# ! !

"

#!

'((( '(()" & * #!

! " & % ! %

#! " 3

! ! ! !

! # ! ! " &

! $ ! *

!

-NWt+1

Net New Investment =

-Quota (t+1)

Quota (t)

x Average NW (t , t+1)

NW t Net New Investment =

-Quota (t+1)

Quota (t)

x Average NW (t , t+1)

NW t

1 0$ " & & 2 '

& C& #! O $

0 C& #! ! P. "

0 : % .11?

% 7 > 0 I : >0I: %

% " F

! # #

! # ! % !

! % " 3

! ! #! !

% % "

! "

> , : / .11? !

% " 3 !

#! #! !

" !

(8)

8

& &

! ! ! !

$ ! " & ! .8 "

&$

3 ! " &

8L .(L #

"

! ! - !

* ! " . !

! ! % " Q %

% ! # " !

.(L !

.(L ! ! "

! "

.

Year

n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months

91 83.69% 2.41% 133 89.73% 36.48% 176 5.50% 35.43% 123 0.34% 1.47% 394 0.01% 0.00%

n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months

104 84.32% 0.15% 144 22.84% 14.43% 189 1.30% 41.98% 166 45.00% 7.11% 323 76.41% 45.96%

n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months

92 42.25% 11.04% 136 36.39% 16.25% 181 0.10% 1.73% 111 0.06% 2.48% 361 4.50% 4.53%

n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months

100 80.98% 3.72% 139 90.29% 1.32% 183 0.08% 49.82% 103 14.32% 5.15% 378 0.00% 0.00%

2001

1 star

2004

2003

2002

5 stars 4 stars 3 stars 2 stars

! ! " < )( '.

! 8AL" 0 .( .. " 3 *

"

6 ! '"

(9)

9 '

Year

Stars n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months

5 37 13.33% 72.29% 54 15.67% 0.43%

4 52 71.57% 45.52% 81 91.56% 13.49%

3 45 2.23% 5.72% 131 35.34% 93.96%

2 18 0.74% 9.36% 105 3.06% 4.77%

1 214 0.00% 0.00% 180 0.00% 0.00%

n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months

5 36 22.64% 30.72% 68 59.08% 0.17%

4 46 33.91% 59.62% 98 37.47% 13.34%

3 51 44.21% 72.17% 138 1.59% 26.77%

2 33 4.63% 44.76% 133 95.43% 11.41%

1 145 88.31% 0.91% 178 28.08% 34.03%

Stars n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months

5 22 8.24% 5.75% 70 91.84% 51.03%

4 43 3.46% 24.64% 93 77.53% 37.30%

3 80 0.08% 1.33% 101 20.34% 28.06%

2 65 0.34% 10.72% 46 5.95% 12.48%

1 212 0.00% 0.00% 149 5.70% 4.13%

Stars n 3 months 6 months n 3 months 6 months

5 38 79.97% 35.71% 62 60.14% 5.00%

4 56 57.91% 1.04% 83 57.65% 26.40%

3 81 2.71% 78.30% 102 1.28% 56.92%

2 56 33.17% 87.68% 47 54.64% 1.68%

1 231 0.00% 0.00% 147 1.29% 55.92%

Retail Wholesale

2004

2003

2002

2001

< ).L ! .(L" 0

.? 8L " 0 ! *

* ! "

F % ! ! " $

" 0

- ! % "

& " 3 !

(10)

10

& $

3

& !

*

#! " 0 %

% " , % ! % !

# # "

& * ! " 3

! ! %

! "

"

!

" ! ! ! " 3 *

! .8 ! " 0

" !

" 0 *

"

&

" & %

(11)

11

& $

1. BLAKE, C., MOREY, M. “Morningstar Ratings and Mutual Fund Performance”, March 1999

2. BROOKS, L.D., KWOK, C.Y. “Examining Event Study Methodologies in Foreign Exchange

Markets”, Journal of International Business Studies, v.21, 1990.

3. CAMPBELL, J.Y., LO, A.W., MACKINLAY, A.C. The Econometrics of Financial Markets,

Princeton: Princeton University Press, p.149-180, 1997.

4. DWYER, G.P. Jr., “The Use of Event Studies in Finance and Economics”, University of Rome

at Tor Vergata, fall, 2001.

5. GUERCIO, D. Del, and TKAC, P.A. “Star Power: The effect of Morningstar Ratings on Mutual

Fund Flows”, Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Working Paper, n.15, 2001.

6. MACKINLAY, A.C. “Event Studies in Economics and Finance”, Journal of Economic

Literature, march, 1997.

7. MOREY, M. “The Kiss of Death: A 5-Star Morningstar Mutual Fund Rating?”, Working Paper,

september 2003. In <http://ssrn.com/abstract=455240> accessed in February, 2nd, 2005.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

As principais indicações para a realização de uma histeroscopia são a avaliação de hemorragia uterina anormal, diagnóstico e tratamento de patologia intrauterina,

Uma vez que dados estatísticos indicam que a depressão se encontra subdiagnosticada em pacientes com doenças crónicas e que existem estudos que confirmam que médicos e

The probability of attending school four our group of interest in this region increased by 6.5 percentage points after the expansion of the Bolsa Família program in 2007 and

Investment behavior of mutual fund shareholders: The evidence from aggregate fund flows.. The Treynor Capital Asset

1. To approve the expenditure of the estimated $306,000 surplus of the Working Capital Fund as of. 31 December 1952 for the following

That the sum of $196,000 be allotted to programs of the Bureau whose nature does not require outside or addition- al financing with resources derived from the

Considering that the Executive Committee at its 13th Meeting, 23-30 April 1951, [recommended in]. Resolution VII that the Directing Council adopt a resolution providing that

Considering that the report on the status of the Working Capital Fund as of 30 June 1951 has been. reviewed and demonstrates that the operation of the Fund has been in accordance