ISSN 0579-6431 DOI:10.2298/ZIPI0702397L
А ВАЊ АВ А А
Ј А
Е ∗
,
,
А .
,
-, .
ђ
-.
.
160 : .
60 (
), 100
» « .
.
.
: , , ,
-.
,
. (
) ђ
(
-) : , ,
-(Kašić i Borota, 2003). .
, , a
.
, ђ ,
-.
(Crystal, 1987),
-,
(Kašić i Borota, 2003).
,
,
.
-,
-, : ,
-.
-,
(Kašić, 2002).
-.
– ( )
( ) .
(Stanojčić i Popović, 2001).
(Rice, 2000).
,
-.
( , , )
-.
» « ,
(Van
der Lely, 2000).
-,
( , , ,
, ) .
, ,
-, , ,
,
-.
, ,
.
, , ,
(Rapin et al., 1992). ,
, ,
-. ,
, ( ),
-, , .
, ,
(Vladisavljević, 1987). ,
-
.
,
.
,
,
-
, ,
.
, ,
.
-, ,
. ђ
–
-, ђ
ђ (Kašić, 2002).
-, ђ ,
׃ (1) - ,
(2)
ђ - .
Ц
,
:
(
-) 7 13 ђ
-. ,
- .
.
7 13 ђ .
60 (12 48
-)
-,
. 100
(29 71 ) » «
,
-.
ђ
,
.
(Wil-liams et al., 1980)
-.
-.
ђ
. ђ ,
-.
,
- .
( x :
Hi-kvad-rat = 1.59, df = 1, p = 0.207; x / : 7 10
11 13 : Hi-kvadrat = 0.55, df = 1, p = 0.459). .
- ,
– (Kašić, 2002). ђ
20
-.
-,
-: e, e, ,
-, , , , ,
.
, ,
-. ђ
– ,
.
-,
.
,
,
-.
.
, ђ
.
-, : » _____________
. ( )«
. ђ
, ђ
. ,
ђ
.
. , 20.
10
,
(split-half).
0.62, 0.85. ,
.
.
ђ . ђ
.
:
,
.
» « ,
.
( ): 7 10 , 11 13
.
1.
( : , ,
/ : 7 10 11 13 );
-:
.
[F (1, 152) = 17.1, p = 0.000,
eta= 0.11] [F (1, 152) =
14.81, p = 0.000, eta = 0.09].
1 (
)
-
. , ( 11
13 ), ,
. ђ (7 10 )
.
-.
-- .
.
1: В (n), a (M)
(S) Ј
( )
- ( )
n M S
7 10 . 8 12.50 2.62
11 13 . 4 15.25 1.26
12 13.42 2.57
7 10 . 28 12.25 2.88
11 13 . 20 13.55 2.72
48 12.79 2.86
7 10 . 36 12.31 2.79
11 13 . 24 13.83 2.60
60 12.92 2.79
7 10 . 17 14.12 3.89
11 13 . 12 17.42 1.93
29 15.48 3.58
7 10 . 37 15.14 2.95
11 13 . 34 16.38 2.03
71 15.73 2.61
7 10 . 54 14.81 3.27
11 13 . 46 16.65 2.04
(11 13 )
,
.
(2002)
-- 11
-. a
.
13
.
--
.
-,
--
--
-. ,
.
- ,
.
ђ .
2
- .
2
.
,
ђ ,
-, .
ђ
:
( ђ
) , , ,
11 13 . 2: Ј ( , n = 60)
-
( , n = 60)
7 10 11 13
. . . 1 11 .53 1.00 .89 .96 .83 .92 .85 1.00 .65 .97 .87 .98 2 12 .67 .94 .94 .96 .75 1.00 .98 .98 .70 .97 .96 .97 3 13 .11 .94 .30 .94 .25 .96 .28 1.00 .17 .95 .29 .97 4 14 .39 .86 .80 .91 .46 1.00 .87 .96 .42 .92 .83 .93 5 15 .39 .75 .85 .87 .25 .83 .78 .98 .33 .78 .82 .92 6 16 .44 .75 .65 .70 .54 .63 .54 .80 .40 .70 .60 75 7 17 .42 .17 .50 .26 .50 .37 .70 .63 .45 .25 .59 .43 8 18 .44 .11 .52 .06 .58 .25 .89 .41 .50 .17 .69 .22 9 19 .69 .97 .87 .96 .83 1.00 1.00 1.00 .75 .98 .93 .98 10 20 .83 .89 .91 .96 .96 .92 1.00 1.00 .88 .90 .95 .98 -- , . . , ,
, , ђ ,
. , ђ ,
,
.
-ђ
-, a a
,
-, ,
-.
.
-,
-:
•
-. ,
;
• (
-). ,
,
-;
•
– ,
,
;
•
–
-, ;
• –
,
;
• ђ .
-:
, ,
.
-, :
• , -
-,
.
11 13
ђ
-.
-, ,
, ,
.
• -
.
, ,
-.
-,
/ .
•
a .
.
,
.
•
-
-:
( ),
-, ,
-.
•
.
,
.
,
- .
-.
.
ђ ( 90%)
(Gibbs & Cooper, 1989; Stewart & Spells,
1983).
, , (Crystal,
1987).
ђ
(Butler, 1983). ђ ,
ђ (Schoenbrodt et
al., 1997). ,
.
,
,
-.
.
-,
.
-, ,
-, ђ
. ђ
,
-,
,
, .
-,
.
-ђ , ,
(Nelson, 1983).
,
. -
-. ,
.
,
-,
-.
. »
«, 149001 (2006-2010),
-.
Korišćena literatura
Butler, K.G. (1983): Language disorders: of primary concern in learning disabilities, Journal Flor. Med. Assoc., Vol. 70, No. 4, 266-269.
Crystal, D. (1987): The Cambridge encyclopedia of language. New York: Cambridge Univer-sity Press.
Gibbs, D.P. & Cooper, E.B. (1989): Prevalence of communication disorders in students with learning disabilities, J. Learn. Disabil., 22, 60-63
Kašić, Z. (2002): Agramatična produkcija i semantička »zbrka« kod dece ranog školskog uzrasta, Istraživanja u defektologiji, 113-130.
Kašić, Z. i V. Borota (2003): Negramatičnost i agramatizam u aktivnom sintaksičkom razvo-ju, Srpski jezik, br. 8/1-2, god. VIII, 439-455.
Nelson, E. (1983): Pediatrics, 12th ed. W.B. Sauners Company, Philadelphia, London. Rapin, I., D., Allen & M. Dunn (1992): Developmental language disorders; in S.J. Segalowitz
& I. Rapin (eds.): Handbook of neuropsychology (111-137). Amsterdam:Elsevie. Rice, M. (2000). Grammatical symptoms of specific language impairment; in D.V.M. Bishop
& L.B. Leonard (eds.): Speech and language impairments in children: causes, charac-teristics, intervention and outcome (17-34). East Susex, England: Psychology Press. Schoenbrodt, L., L. Kumin & J.M. Sloan (1997): Learning disabilities existing concomitantly
Stanojčić, Ž. i Lj. Popović (2001): Gramatika srpskoga jezika. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Stewart, J. M. & V. R. Spells (1983): Learning disabilities and comunicative disorders as re-lated handicaps: a two year study, Journal Communicative Disorders, Vol. 16, No. 5, 345-355.
Williams, D.M., J.D. Darbyshire & D.A. Vaghy (1980): An epidemiological study of speech and hearning disorders, Journal Otolaringolog, No. 9, 5-24.
Van der Lely, H. (2002) : The computational syntactic system: a comment on W. Frawley’ s »Control and cross-domain mental computation: evidence from language breakdown«, Computational Intelligence, Vol. 18, No. 1, 39-42.
Vladisavljević, S. (1987): Afazije i razvojne disfazije. Beorgad: Naučna knjiga.
06. 09. 2007; 08. 10. 2007.
Emilija Lazarević and Lazar Tenjović
UNDERSTANDING OF SUBORDINATE CLAUSES IN THE LANGUAGE OF DYSPHASIC CHILDREN
Abstract
This paper presents the results of the research of peculiarities of syntactic develop-ment, as an element of language structure on the grammatical level of children suf-fering from developmental dysphasia, after the completed speech pathology treat-ment of many years. Syntactic level at younger school age was studied by assessing language competence in the accomplishment of communicative sentence with subordinate clause. The research was performed on the samples of children at school age in regular primary schools in Belgrade. The sample comprised 160 respondents who were divided in two groups: target and comparative. The target group consisted of 60 respondents (children suffering from developmental dysphasia after the com-pleted speech pathology treatment of many years), and the comparative group con-sisted of 100 respondents from regular primary school “Gavrilo Princip” in Zemun. Research results show that grammatical development of children suffering from developmental dysphasia takes place at a considerably slower rate and entails sub-stantially more difficulties in accomplishing predication in subordinate clauses. This paper discusses the consequences which the difficulties in grammatical development can have on school achievement.
Key words: syntactic development, subordinate clause, developmental dysphasia,
school achievement.
Э
Ы ю
-.
-.
160
. .
: . 60
( ,
-), – 100 .
. ,
.
,
.
ю ы : ,
