h ttp : / / w w w . b j m i c r o b i o l . c o m . b r /
Review
Lactoferrin,
chitosan
and
Melaleuca
alternifolia—natural
products
that
show
promise
in
candidiasis
treatment
Lorena
de
Oliveira
Felipe
∗,
Willer
Ferreira
da
Silva
Júnior,
Katialaine
Corrêa
de
Araújo,
Daniela
Leite
Fabrino
UniversidadeFederaldeSãoJoãodel-Rei/CampusAltoParaopeba,MinasGerais,MG,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:
Received18August2016 Accepted26May2017
Availableonline11November2017 AssociateEditor:LuisHenrique Guimarães Keywords: Candida Lactoferrin Melaleucaalternifolia Chitosan Naturalproducts
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Theevolutionofmicroorganismsresistanttomanymedicineshasbecomeamajor chal-lengeforthescientificcommunityaroundtheworld.Motivatedbythegravityofsucha situation,theWorldHealthOrganizationreleasedareportin2014withtheaimofproviding updatedinformationonthiscriticalscenario.Amongthemostworryingmicroorganisms, speciesfromthegenusCandidahaveexhibitedahighrateofresistancetoantifungaldrugs. Therefore,theobjectiveofthisreviewistoshowthattheuseofnaturalproducts(extractsor isolatedbiomolecules),alongwithconventionalantifungaltherapy,canbeaverypromising strategytoovercomemicrobialmultiresistance.Somepromisingalternativesareessential oilsofMelaleucaalternifolia(mainlycomposedofterpinen-4-ol,atypeofmonoterpene), lacto-ferrin(apeptideisolatedfrommilk)andchitosan(acopolymerfromchitin).Suchproducts havegreatpotentialtoincreaseantifungaltherapyefficacy,mitigatesideeffectsandprovide awiderangeofactioninantifungaltherapy.
©2017SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Thisis anopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/
licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Introduction
Fungalinfectionsareresponsibleformanydeathsaroundthe world,inadditiontocontributingtosignificantexpensesin publichealth.1Amongthepossibleetiologicagents,Candida
spp.arenotedduetotheirrelevanceandprevalence. Accord-ingtoMcCartyandPappas(2015),15–20microorganismsfrom thegenusCandidaaredescribedascertaintocauseinfection.2
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:lorenaob@gmail.com(L.O.Felipe).
However, fourspecies cause 96%ofthe infections:Candida albicansisthemainetiologicagent,responsiblefor42.5%of infections,followedbyCandidatropicalis(27.3%),Candida para-psilosis(21.9%)andCandidaglabrata(4.4%).3
InfectionsoriginatingfromC.albicanshavebeenobserved since the time of Hippocrates,who described Candida dis-eases indebilitatedpatientsin337B.C.4 Now,Candidaspp.
areresponsibleforthemajorityofbloodinfectionsin inten-sivetherapyunitsaroundtheworld,impactinghospitalization timesandcosts.5In2005,forexample,theCentersforDisease
ControlandPrevention(CDC)showedthatforeach diagno-sis of Candida spp. infection, the period of hospitalization
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2017.05.008
1517-8382/©2017SociedadeBrasileiradeMicrobiologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCC BY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
islengthened from 3to13 days. Financially speaking,this additionalperiodleads toexpenses from $6000 to$29,000. Furthermore,eachyear,thesevaluesareestimatedtoreach approximately$8billion.6,7
Advances in medicine have enabled people who are immunesuppressed(suchasthosewhohavereceivedorgan transplantsorareHIVpositive)tolivelongerlives.8The
great-estvulnerabilityofsuchindividualsistometabolicallyflexible microorganismsofthegenusCandida,whichhaveincreased therateofmorbidityand mortalityto35% inthis groupof people.9 In addition, parallel to the increasing number of
casesoffungal infection causedbyCandidaspp., the resis-tanceofCandidaspp.toantimicrobialdrugshasprogressively increased.Thelatter facthas sparkedthe attention ofthe WorldHealthOrganization(WHO)duetoitsrelevanceandled tothereleaseofthereportAntimicrobialResistance:GlobalReport Surveillance.10
ThedevelopmentofresistanceinCandidaspp.,from ther-apywithamphotericinB,againstdrugsfromtheazolegroup, echinocandinandfluconazolewasamongthekey informa-tion providedinthis report,along withreports ofcasesof multiresistancefromdifferentregionsoftheworldsuchas AsiaandtheMiddleEastandsomeareasofSouthAmerica.10
Thesedataarealarmingbecausesuchresistancehas devel-opedagainstantifungaldrugswidelyusedtocombatfungal diseasesworldwide.AmphotericinB,forexample,isaclassical antifungaldrug,andinmanycountries,itistheonlymedicine availableforthetreatmentoffungalinfections.
The azoles have been administered in formulations that combine different groups of chemotherapeutic drugs, attempting to overcome the increase in microbial resis-tance. This fact impacts both the cost and the success of treatmentsagainstthattypeofinfection.Finally, the devel-opment of resistance to fluconazole—the most commonly usedantifungal—drasticallyvariesaccordingtotheCandida spp. and from country to country.For example,the inten-sityofthemultiresistance inCandidaspp.tofluconazoleis higherinDenmark(33%)and lowerinthe KoreanRepublic (0.9%).10Therefore,theaimofthispaperistodiscussthemost
promisingsubstancesavailableforcandidiasistreatment.In addition,thisworkreinforcestheimportanceofusingnatural productsalongwiththosemedicinestraditionallyemployed inthetreatmentofsuchinfections.
Natural
products
Natural products have been widely used in society since 3500B.C.11 Medicinalmethodsrangefrom folkmedicine to
validated treatments.12ThedoctorParacelsusisconsidered
thefounderofplant-basedmedicineduetohisgreat contrib-utionsinthefield.13 Hisfindings,alongwiththoseofother
researchers,ledtoaconsolidationofknowledgeinthefieldof naturalproductsandcreatedotherdomainssuchas pharma-cognosy.Amongthemedicinalpropertiesofnaturalproducts, one canfind anti-inflammatory,antispasmodic, anticancer, antimutagenic,antibacterial,antifungal,antiviraland vermi-cidalproperties.14
Essential oils compose the most utilized group of sub-stances.Isolatedfromplants,essential oilsare compounds largely described in the scientific literature as versatile in thetreatmentofmanyinfirmities.15Theiractiveingredients
are usuallyvariousterpenes, whichare secondary metabo-lites excreted byvegetables to expelpredators or harmful agents.16Oneexampleofabioactiveessentialoilistheone
obtainedfromMelaleucaalternifolialeaves;theactivityofthis oilisattributedtoterpinen-4-ol,amonoterpene.17
Theisolationofbioactivemoleculesisalsoperformedon naturalsourcesotherthanvegetablecells.Somemetabolites produced bymicroorganismsare alsoimportantsourcesof new bioactive substances.18 In Table 1, therapeutic agents
obtainedthroughbioprospectionarepresented;theseagents areresponsibleforsignificantimpactonthemedicinal treat-mentsthathavebeenofferedinrecentyears.
InadditiontothecompoundslistedinTable1,lactoferrin(a peptideisolatedfrommilk)andchitosan(acopolymerderived from chitin) also show distinct biological activity, includ-ingantioxidant,anti-allergyandantimicrobialactions.19The
associationofsuchnaturalproductswithotherantimicrobial drugshasbeenrecentlyinvestigatedtoidentifyapossible syn-ergisticeffect.Thiscanprovidealternativetreatmentsagainst multiresistantmicroorganisms,therebyreducingtheamount ofdrugsusedintreatments,whichcanimpactdrug-resistance phenomena.
However, as noted by Harvey et al. (2015), due to the environmental legislation that protects biodiversity, bioprospection,amongotherpursuits,hassuffereda consid-erableslowdowninthelast20years.20Thereductioninthe
rate ofdrugdiscovery and newmedicines provided bythe pharmaceuticalindustryreflectssuchconstraints.
Bioprospection is a feasible way to discover new biomolecules.Oneexampleofsuchadiscoveryisteixobactin, whichwasisolatedfromsoilsamplesbyLingetal.(2015).21
Thismoleculeprovedtobeverypromisingasanewantibiotic class because its administration in mice was able to suc-cessfullyeliminateinfectionscausedbyStaphylococcusaureus superbacteriastrains.Therefore,afternearly30years with-out anew drugdiscovery, this promisingmolecule—found
Table1–Conventionalmedicinesoriginallyobtainedfromnaturalsources.
Activecompound Source Type Indication/Use
Artemisinin Artemisiaannua Plant Antimalarial
Lovastatindiseases Aspergillusterreus Microbial Hypercholesterolemia/cardiovascular
Micafungin Coleophomaempetri Microbial Antifungal
Paclitaxel Taxusbrevifolia Plant Anti-tumor
Table2–Typesofinfectiondescribedforcandidiasisanditsrespectiveplacesofoccurrence.
Typeofcandidiasis Locationofoccurrence
Mucocutaneous Oral,vaginal,penile(balanitis).32–34
Cutaneous Moisturizedpartsofbody:areasclosetobreast,armpits,foldofgroinandunderthenails.35
Systemic(candidemia) Visceraldissemination:lungs,meninges,kidney,bladder,joints,liver,heartandeyes.5
Table3–Differentclassesofantifungalsthatare availableonthemarket.
Azoles Echinocandins Pyrimidines Polienics Cetoconazole Anidulafungin Flucytosine Amphotericin-B Fluconazole Caspofungin Nystatin Itraconazole Micafungin
Pozaconazole
through bioprospection—may revolutionize the current
antibacterialtreatments.21
Findingbioactivecompoundsisnotaneasytask. There-fore,naturalproductshavebeen usedalongwithsynthetic drugstoovercome,mainly,resistancetoantimicrobialdrugs or to alleviate the side effects associated with specific therapies.
Candidiasis
Microorganisms from the genus Candida are described as yeastsandincludemorethan160species.22Intermsof
mor-phology,thegenusischaracterizedasbeingthick,curd-like (cheesy),andyellowish-white.Candidaalbicansisfound exten-sivelyinhumans,and theseyeastsareeasilyisolatedfrom theskinandgastrointestinaltract.23 Therefore,thistypeof
microorganismlivescommensally,co-inhabitingandexisting inequilibriumwithhumanmicrobiota.24Nonetheless,under
specificconditions,thesemicroorganismsarefavored,which usuallyenablestheactivation ofthevirulencefactor, mak-ingsuchorganismspathogenicandharmfultothehealthof thehost.25,26 Thus,C.albicansisknownasanopportunistic
microorganism.27
Peoplewithimmunodeficiencycomposethegroupwiththe highesttendencytodevelopcandidiasis.Amongthemost vul-nerablepeople areelderlypeople andbabies;patientswith cancer, AIDS or with transplants; people whose treatment usescatheters(inparenteralnutritionorinhemodialysis);and peoplesubmittedtotherapiesbasedonantimicrobialdrugsof largespectrum/corticoids.28–30Thetypeandtheintensityof
theinfection(Table2)aredirectlyrelatedtotheimmunological responseofthepatient.31
WhenCandidaspp.takeadvantageofahost’s immunosen-sitivity,themajormechanismsofvirulenceandtheinvasive capacityoftheCandidaspp.aremainlyrelatedto(i)theability toformbiofilmreinforcedbyamechanismofquorumsensing and (ii) phenotypic switching,that is, when yeastschange tothe filamentous form,which is a determinantof tissue invasion.36,37
Manyclasses ofdrugsare availableforthe treatmentof thistypeofinfection,asshowninTable3.However, consider-ingthatfungi,aswellashumancells,areeukaryotic,patients may suffer from several side effects that arise from such
drugs.Nephrotoxicity(especiallyinamphotericin administra-tion),nausea/vomitingandstomachacheareamongthemain effects.
Inadditiontosideeffects,anothermajorchallengeinthe campaignagainstCandidaspp.infectionsistherefractoriness tothose medicines that aretraditionally used.38 Thelatter
problemarosefromtheindiscriminateuseofantifungaldrugs or long antifungal therapies,favoring the naturalselection ofCandidaspp.-resistantstrains.Someexamplesofresistant strainsareC.albicans,C.glabatra,C.kruseiandC.auris.39
Can-dida lusitaniae hasalsobeen reportedtodevelopresistance duringtherapywithAmphotericin-B.40
Therefore,differentstudieshaveindicatedthatthe asso-ciation oftraditionalmedicineswithalternativetreatments (herein, natural products or biomolecules) as a promis-ing option for therapeutic success against Candida spp. infection.41Amongthealternatives,themostprominentare
lactoferrin,chitosanandMalaleucaalternifoliaextracts. Promis-ingbiomoleculesinthetreatmentofcandidiasis
Lactoferrin
Antimicrobialpeptides(AMPs)havebeendescribedinthe sci-entificliteratureandcorrespondtoagroupofapproximately 1200 molecules.42,43 They can be isolated from different
sources suchasbacteria, insects,plantsand vertebrates.44
Lactoferrin(LF)isanexampleofanAMP.
LFwasinitiallyidentifiedincowmilkin1939.45Inhuman milk,LF wasnotisolated until1960.46,47 Then,thispeptide
beganbeingrecognizedasoneoftheessentialcomponentsin thedefensesystemforcombattinginfectionscausedby differ-entetiologicagents—bacteria,fungi,parasitesandviruses.48
Inadditiontobeinginmilk,LFisalsowidelyfoundon der-malmucosa,inneutrophils(whereresponsestoinflammatory stimuliarereleased)andinexternalsecretions—tears,saliva, vaginalmucus and seminalplasma.49,50 Inbodyfluids, the
concentrationofLFdependsonwheretheLFisfound:inthe colostrum,theconcentrationisfrom5to7mgL−1,whereas intears,theconcentrationisapproximately2mgL−1.51,52 In
blood,dependingontheinflammatoryprocess,the concentra-tionofLFalsovariesfrom10−3to200gmL−1.53Incontrast,
accordingtoCohenetal.(1987),theconcentrationofLFin vagi-nalmucusvariesasafunctionofthemenstrualcycle:before menstruation,theconcentrationis3.8–11.4gmg−1,whereas aftermenstruation,thisvalueincreasesto62.9–218gmg−1.54
Cohen et al. (1987) also showed that womensubmitted to continuous contraceptive-based treatment have drastically affectedLFconcentrationsinthevaginalmucus,with concen-trationsremainingstableduringtheentiremenstrualcycleat approximately19.8gmg−1.54
Structurally, LF is one glycoprotein bound to an iron nucleus,withareddish-pinkcolor,madeupof692aminoacids andwithamolecularweightof80kDa.Fifty-fivepercentof theseaminoacidsaresimilartotheonesfoundintransferrin (theproteinresponsibleforirontransportinplasma). Lacto-ferrinexistsintwodifferentforms:halo-lactoferrin(richin iron)andapo-lactoferrin(freeofiron).Itisalsodescribedas beingabletobindtoothermetals(aluminum,copper,gallium, manganeseandzinc)betterthaniron.55
Regarding the antimicrobialactivity ofLF, the following mechanisms are described in the literature: (i) microbial growth is inhibited by iron deprivation because LF takes iron away from the pathogen or the media where the microorganismispresent56;(ii) theproteinpresents
differ-entenzymatic activitiesinitspurifiedsub-fractions,which includeATPase,DNase,RNase,phosphatase andhydrolysis of malto-oligosaccharide57; (iii) LF increases cell wall
per-meability, leading to the leakage of cytoplasmatic content and microorganism deathbecause lactoferrin’sN-terminus regionhasastrongpositivechargethateasilyinteractswith lipopolysaccharides,whichhaveanegativecharge58;and(iv)
incontrast,assuggestedbyUlvatneetal.(2001),LFisnotable toinducecellularlysesinunscathedbacteriabutleadsto vesi-cleformationthroughaplasmaticmembranedepolarization mechanism.59 Considering the facts mentioned previously,
lactoferrin has been recently explored in several scientific investigationswithdifferentaims,especiallyincombination withantifungaldrugs.60Inthelattercase,asynergisticeffect isthefocuswithregardtofightingagainstresistantand non-resistantmicroorganismstrainsinthegenusCandida.61
Lactoferrin:
antifungal
drugs
with
a
synergistic
effect
Candidemiainnewbornsisacriticalproblemthathas con-tinuouslysparkedtheattentionofthescientificcommunity. Venkateshand Rong (2008) evaluatedthe combined use of humanrecombinantlactoferrin(talactoferrin,TLF)with flu-conazoleandAmphotericin-BagainstthreestrainsofCandida spp.;twostrainswereisolatedfromnewbornsdiagnosedwith septicemia caused by C. albicans. The results showed that eithertheinteractionofTLFwithfluconazoleand/orTLFwith Amphotericin-Bpresentedasynergisticeffect.62
Thereafter,Venkateshetal.(2009)studiedthepreventionof biofilmformation(oneofthevirulencemechanismsobserved inCandida)bytheassociationofTLFwithantifungaldrugs; C.albicansATCCMYA4441wasthestrainusedinthisstudy. Asynergisticeffectwasobservedinthemixturecontaining bothTLFandAmphotericin-BandTLFandfluconazole.This studyisespeciallyimportantbecauseCandidabiofilm forma-tion isextremelycritical inintensivetherapy unitsaround the world, leading to high rates ofmortality and morbid-ityfrom infectionsofthe bloodstreamrelatedtocatheters. Otherstudieshavefocusedontheinteraction oflactoferrin withfluconazole,showingthatLFprobablyinteractswiththe microorganism’scellwall,raisingitspermeabilityandthereby increasingtherateofdrugpenetrationintothecell.63
Inaninvivostudy,Tanidaetal.(2001)carriedoutassays withrodentstoinvestigate thesynergistic effectofLF and
other elements. However, in that study, the LF that was used was synthesized inthe laboratory (knownas peptide 2).Anothersimilarsyntheticmolecule(peptide2)wasalso tested. Mice were inoculated with 5.0×108 cells of
Can-dida (considereda lethaldose).Furthermore,the micethat did not receive treatment or were treated with peptide 2 died after 8 and 7 days, respectively. On the other hand, micesubmitted tointravenousadministration ofpeptide2 (5 and 100gday−1) over 5days lived longer (8.4±2.9 and 22.4±3.6days,respectively).Additionally,instudiescarried outbythesameauthors,amousethatreceived1.0×109
Can-dida cells (above the lethal dose) had its life extendedfor 8.2±2.4 days (treated with 10gday−1 ofpeptide 2) com-paredwiththe control(lived foraperiodof3.2±1.3days). When peptide 2was administered (10gday−1)along with Amphotericin-B (0.1gday−1) and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulatingfactor(GM-CSF)(0.1gday−1),60%ofthe micelivedformorethan22days,evenwhenreceiving Can-didadoseshigherthanthelethalamount.Whenpeptide2was administeredalongwithGM-CSF,thephagocyticactivitywas raised1.5timesduetoanimmunesystemstimulus.64
A few years later, Okamoto et al. (2004) confirmed the resultsofTanidaetal.(2011).Inthiscase,thesame method-ologywasadopted.
However,anothergroupofmicewasalsoinoculatedwith 1.0×108Aspergillusfumigatuscells.Forbothmicroorganisms,
thecombinationoflactoferrin,Amphotericin-BandGM-CSF increasedthesurvivaltimeoftherodentsfor35days.65
Melaleuca
alternifolia
Melaleuca alternifoliabelongs tothe Myrtaceaefamily.66 This
plantisdescribedasascrublandspeciesandcanbefound pri-marilyinSouthAmerica,westernIndiaandAustralia.Inthe lattercountry,theplantisknownasteatreeandhasbeenused infolkmedicinelearnedfromaboriginalpeople.Some biolog-icalactivitiesofM.alternifoliaincludeantibacterial,antiviral andantifungalaction.67
Teatreeoil(TTO)canbeobtainedfromthehydrodistillation ofM.alternifolialeaves,andthechemicalcompositionvaries withtheextractionmethodandcropregion.Generally,thisoil isacomplexmixtureofmonoterpenesandterpenoids(50% oxygenated and 50% hydrocarbons)and approximately 100 othersubstances.68Amongthesesubstances,terpinen-4-olis
theprimarycompound(≈30%TTOcomposition)andis indi-catedastheactiveingredientresponsibleforthetherapeutic propertiesofTTO.However,studiessuchtheoneperformed byMiller(1984),whereTTO’santimicrobialactivitywashigher thantheactivityoftheisolatedterpinen-4-ol,haveshownthe synergyamongthecompoundsoftheplant.69
AccordingtoCaloetal.(2015),theantimicrobialactivityof theM.alternifoliaterpenesisassociatedwithhydrophobicity inwhichthe terpenesinteractwiththepathogen’scellular membranelipids,changingthemembrane’spermeability.70,71 Amongthemainresultsofmembranepermeabilityarethe(i) modificationofproton-motiveforce,leadingtoadeficitinthe productionofcellularenergycausedbythedecreaseinATP generationand(ii)cellularlysesduetoleakageorcoagulation ofthecytoplasm.72,73
Melaleuca
alternifolia
(tea
tree
oil):
studies
in
the
treatment
of
candidiasis
Melaleucaalternifoliahasbeenconsideredapromising alterna-tiveinthetreatmentofstomatitiscausedbydentures,which is a recurrent problem in the elderly. de Campos Rasteiro etal.(2014)determinedboththeMICandminimumbiofilm eradication concentration (MBEC) ofTTO inin vivo experi-ments.Theresultsshoweda0.195% MICand 12.5%MBEC. Thelatterconcentrationwasusedintopicalapplication in animalexperiments.Morphologicanalysisthroughscanning electronmicroscopy (SEM)of mouse tonguetissueshowed considerablewoundareareduction,whereascolony-forming unitswerereducedby5.33log,whichhighlightsthepotential ofM.alternifolia.74
Pachavaetal.(2015)foundcolony-formingunitsof approx-imately30,43and19%ofthecontrolwhendiscsimpregnated withTTOweresubmergedinaC.albicanssuspension.That resultindicatesthatTTOcouldbeusedtocoatdenturesand reducethewoundscausedbyCandida.75SharmaandHegde
(2014) alsoinvestigatedthe impregnation ofdentures with TTOandfluconazole.TTO’sMICwasequalto30%m/m,while fluconazole’sMICwas5%m/m.Atthesameconcentrations, fluconazolelostitsantifungalactivity after7days,whereas TTOdidnot.76SimilarresultswereobtainedbyDalwaietal.
(2014),wherebothchlorhexidinegluconateandTTOretained theirbioactivityafter14daysofincubation,whereas flucona-zolebecameinactive.77Ontheotherhand,VanVuurenetal.
(2009)evaluatedtheassociationofTTOwith amphotericin-B(AMP-B)againstC.albicans(ATCC10231),throughMICand fractionaryinhibitoryconcentrationindex(FICI)calculation.78
Thefollowingantimicrobialagentratioresultedina syner-gisticinteraction(FICI<1):6:4AMP-B:TTO(FICI0.93)and1:9 AMP-B:TTO(FICI0.95).79 Similarly,Rosatoetal.(2009)
com-binedTTOandnystatinandusedthemtochallengeC.albicans, C.kruseiandC.tropicalis.ThisresultedinFICIs>0.5,also indi-catingasynergisticeffect.80
Recently,inastudypublishedbyDiVitoetal.(2015),the combination of Amphotericin-B and TTOshowed a syner-gisticeffectagainstdifferentspeciesofCandida.Thatstudy focusedonthedevelopmentofavaginalsuppositoryfor vul-vovaginalcandidiasistreatment.Candidastrainswereisolated from patients who had vaginitis. A synergistic effect was obtainedforconcentrationsequalto0.25gmL−1 ofAMP-B and0.08gmL−1ofTTO.Inthesamestudy,TTOwasshown nottokillvaginalmicrobiotaatconcentrationsbelow2%v/v (Bifidobacteriumanimalisremainedalive)andonly concentra-tionsabove4%v/vwerebactericidal.81
Nonetheless,asdescribedbyKonandRai(2013),alargegap remainsinthedevelopmentofinvivostudiestoevaluatethe biologicalactivityofM.alternifoliacombinedornotwith anti-fungaldrugs.Therefore,suchstudiesshouldbeencouraged toobtainmoreconsistentresultsaboutthecommercialuseof TTOforthetreatmentofcandidiasis.82
Chitosan
Chitinisdefinedasanaturalpolymer,andaftercellulose,itis themostwidespreadandabundantpolysaccharidefoundin
nature.Ithasstructuralandprotectivefunctionsandisfound mainlyinarthropods,thecarapacesofshrimp,insects,and thecellwallsofsomefungi.
Thecationiccopolymerchitosancanbeobtainedfromthe deacetylationofchitin.Inthisprocess,chitin’sacetylgroups (COCH3)arereplacedbyaminegroups(–NH2).Thisprocesscan
bedonethroughthreedifferentmechanisms:(i)thealkaline hydrolysisofthechitinathightemperatures,(ii)the employ-ment of the enzymechitinase, and (iii)through the direct actionofmicroorganisms.Dependingonthedegreeof acet-ylation, chitosan may have several byproducts of different composition, whichwillaffect themolecule’ssolubility.For example,whilechitinisinsolubleinmostsolvents,chitosan issolubleinorganicandinorganicacids.Structurally,chitosan isdefinedasacopolymerthatiscomposedofd-glucosamine monomersandN-acetyl-d-glucosamineresiduesboundwith glycoside(1→4).83
Chitosanisfunctional,nontoxic,biocompatible, biodegrad-able,andbioactive,withchelatingcapacity,selective perme-ability and polyelectrolytes.All of thesecharacteristics are dependent on chitosan’s purity, viscosity, degree of acety-lationandmolecularweight.Anotherpropertyofchitosanis its antimicrobialcharacteristics.Themechanismsofaction seemtobethrough(i)chitosan’sinteractionwiththe phospho-lipids’sialicacid(anionicgroup)becausechitosanispositively charged, leading to cell agglutination and preventing cells fromexchangingsubstanceswithexternalmedia,and(ii)the penetrationofchitosanintothecell,wherethechitosanblocks DNAandRNAtranscriptionandinhibitscellgrowth.Generally, chitosan’saminegroupsareresponsibleforitsantimicrobial activity.84
Chitosan:
potential
in
candidiasis
treatment
Thecombinationofchitosanwithantifungaldrugshasshown promising results.Soliman et al. (2015), forexample, inoc-ulated 0.1mL of C. albicans suspension into 80 mice with induced neutropenia. Twenty-four hours later, 20 animals were treated with saline solution (control group), 20 with chitosanextract(CE),20withAmphotericin-B(150mgkg−1) (AMB),andthelast20withchitosanandamphotericin simul-taneously(150mgkg−1)(CE+AMB)for72h.Whencompared tothecontrolgroup,theanimalsthatreceivedCE,AMBand CE+AMBshowedareductioninfungaldensityof73%,87%and 90%,respectively.Inaddition,oxidativestressmarkers,such asmalondialdehyde(MDA),reducedglutathione(GSH), super-oxidedismutase(SOD),catalase(CAT)andnitricoxide(NO), wereanalyzedfromthemouselungtissue.Theresultsshowed that the groups that were treated with CE and CE+AMB showedasignificantreductioninthelevelsofMDA,SOD,CAT andNOcomparedtothecontrolgroup.Ontheotherhand, thelevelsofGSHincreased,whichclearlyindicatesthat chi-tosancanmitigateoxidativestressorlungwoundscausedby systemiccandidiasis.85Alternatively,Senyi ˘gitetal.(2014)evaluatedthe formula-tion ofchitosangel forvulvovaginalcandidiasis treatment. Suchagelwasproducedwithchitosanofdifferent viscosi-ties (20,000, 200,000 and 800,000mPas)and two antifungal drugs:miconazolenitrateandeconazolenitrate.Invivostudies
showedthatchitosanof200,000mPasledtothebestresults withbothantifungaldrugs.Thisconclusionwasbasedonthe followinggelproperties:mucosaladhesion,mechanical prop-ertiesandadequatedrugrelease.86
Chhonkeret al. (2015) investigatedthe potential of chi-tosan,incombinationwithAmphotericin-B,asatreatment forfungalkeratitis.Theactivecompoundswereusedtocoat 161.9–230.5-nm nanoparticles to extend the drug delivery time.Thenanocarrierscontainingchitosanandamphotericin were found to bemore active againstC. albicans than the commercial formulation (Fungizone®). In addition, in vivo studieswerecarriedoutinrabbitsforpharmacokinetic stud-ies, where it was observed that the bioavailability of the medicinewasincreased2.04times,whereas theprecorneal residence time was increased 3.36 times. Finally, the best results were achieved with chitosan of average molecular weight.87Suchresultsarerelevantbecausefungalkeratitisis
aneyesdiseasethatisresponsibleforblindnessofmany peo-plearoundtheworld,andmedicinescurrentlyavailableforits treatmenthavestrongsideeffects.
Parker et al. (2016) investigated the role of chitosan in associationwithAmphotericin-Bandpolyethyleneglycolin the local treatment of muscle wounds. Sponges were uti-lizedasameans ofdelivering theformulation.Theresults ofinvivotestsledtotheconclusionthatspongescoatedwith Amphotericin-Breleasedtheformulation(atconcentrations above0.25gmL−1)formorethan72h.88
Final
remarks
The prospection of biomolecules and natural products is clearly an important strategy for discovering and making availablenewdrugsforthetreatmentofdifferentdiseases, aswellasforuseinincreasingtheactivityofcommondrugs throughsynergism,whichcanbeseenasapromisingstrategy toovercomethealarmingcurrentdrugmultiresistance sce-nario.Inthiscontext,M.alternifolia,lactoferrinandchitosan havebeendemonstratedtobeviableoptionsinthetreatment offungalinfections,mainlyagainstCandidaspp.,whenused inassociation ornotwithantimicrobialdugs.Thisis espe-ciallyimportantbecauseCandidahasledtoahighmortality rateworldwide.Therefore,studieshaveindicatedthe feasi-bilityofusingsyntheticandnaturalproductsincombination toimprovetheiractivitythoughsynergismandovercomethe problemofmicrobialmultiresistance.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.MatthaiouDK,ChristodoulopoulouT,DimopoulosG.Howto
treatfungalinfectionsinICUpatients.BMCInfectDis.
2015;15:205.
2.McCartyTP,PappasPG.Invasivecandidiasis.InfectDisClin
NorthAm.2015;30:103–124.
3.LiuS,HouY,ChenX,GaoY,LiH,SunS.Combinationof
fluconazolewithnon-antifungalagents:apromising
approachtocopewithresistantCandidaalbicansinfections
andinsightintonewantifungalagentdiscovery.IntJ
AntimicrobAgents.2014;43:395–402.
4.McCoolL.
TheDiscoveryandNamingofCandidaalbicans;2016.Availableat:
http://antimicrobe.org/h04c.files/history/DiscoveryNamingof
CandidaAlbicans.pdfAccessed17.08.16.
5.QuindósG.Epidemiologyofcandidaemiaandinvasive
candidiasis.Achangingface.RevIberoamMicol.
2014;31:42–48.
6.ArnoldHM,MicekST,ShorrAF,etal.Hospitalresource
utilizationandcostsofinappropriatetreatmentof
candidemia.Pharmacotherapy.2010;30:361–368.
7.MorganJ,MeltzerMI,PlikaytisBD,etal.Excessmortality,
hospitalstay,andcostduetocandidemia:acase-control
studyusingdatafrompopulation-basedcandidemia
surveillance.InfectControlHospEpidemiol.2005;26:540–547.
8.JacobsDM,BeydaND,AsuphonO,AlamMJ,GareyKW.Host
factorsandclinicaloutcomesofCandidacolonizationin
criticallyillpatients.Mycopathologia.2015;179:87–93.
9.FridkinSK.Candidemiaiscostly—plainandsimple.Clin
InfectDis.2005;41:1240–1241.
10.WHO.AntimicrobialResistance:GlobalReportSurveillance;2014. Availableat:
http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112642/1/
9789241564748eng.pdf?ua=1Accessed17.08.16.
11.ScottRPW.Essentialoils.In:EncyclopediaofAnalyticalScience.
2nded.Elsevier;2005:554–561.
12.KoehnFE,CarterGT.Theevolvingroleofnaturalproductsin
drugdiscovery.NatRevDrugDiscov.2005;4:206–220.
13.FerreiraTS,MoreiraCZ,CáriaNZ,VictorianoG,SilvaWFJr,
MagalhãesJC.Phytotherapy:anintroductiontoitshistory,
useandapplication.RevBrasPlantMed.2014;162:290–298.
14.MogosanuGD,GrumezescuA,HuangK-S,BejenaruL,
BejenaruC.Preventionofmicrobialcommunities:novel
approachesbasednaturalproducts.CurrPharmBiotechnol.
2015;16:94–111.
15.NegriM,SalciTP,Shinobu-MesquitaCS,CapociIRG,
SvidzinskiTIE,KioshimaES.Earlystateresearchon
antifungalnaturalproducts.Molecules.2014;19:2925–2956.
16.MartinsN,BarrosL,HenriquesM,SilvaS,FerreiraICFR.
Activityofphenoliccompoundsfromplantoriginagainst
Candidaspecies.IndCropsProd.2015;74:648–670.
17.HomeyerDC,SanchezCJ,MendeK,etal.Invitroactivityof
Melaleucaalternifolia(teatree)oilonfilamentousfungiand
toxicitytohumancells.MedMycol.2015;53:285–294.
18.BluntJW,CoppBR,KeyzersRA,MunroMHG,PrinsepMR.
Marinenaturalproducts.NatProdRep.2013;30:237–323.
19.NgoD-H,VoT-S,NgoD-N,etal.Biologicaleffectsofchitosan
anditsderivatives.FoodHydrocoll.2015;51:200–216.
20.HarveyAL,Edrada-EbelR,QuinnRJ.There-emergenceof
naturalproductsfordrugdiscoveryinthegenomicsera.Nat
RevDrugDiscov.2015;14:111–129.
21.LingLL,SchneiderT,PeoplesAJ,etal.Anewantibiotickills
pathogenswithoutdetectableresistance.Nature.
2015;517:455–459.
22.Blaschke-HellmessenR.HabitatsforCandidainmedicaland
hygienicrespects.Mycoses.1999;42(suppl1):22–29.
23.HuffnagleGB,NoverrMC.Theemergingworldofthefungal
microbiome.TrendsMicrobiol.2013;21:334–341.
24.UnderhillDM,IlievID.Themycobiota:interactionsbetween
commensalfungiandthehostimmunesystem.NatRev
Immunol.2014;14:405–416.
25.KiyouraY,TamaiR.InnateimmunitytoCandidaalbicans.Jpn
26.TagliaferriE,MenichettiF.Treatmentofinvasivecandidiasis:
betweenguidelinesanddailyclinicalpractice.ExpertRevAnti
InfectTher.2015.
27.NeteaMG,JoostenLAB,vanderMeerJWM,KullbergB-J,van
deVeerdonkFL.ImmunedefenceagainstCandidafungal
infections.NatRevImmunol.2015;15:630–642.
28.ManzoniP,MostertM,CastagnolaE.Updateonthe
managementofCandidainfectionsinpretermneonates.Arch
DisChildFetalNeonatalEd.2015;100:F454–F459.
29.TangH-J,LiuW-L,LinH-L,LaiC-C.Epidemiologyand
prognosticfactorsofcandidemiaincancerpatients.PLOS
ONE.2014;9:e99103.
30.SeeligMS.Theroleofantibioticsinthepathogenesisof
Candidainfections.AmJMed.1966;40:887–917.
31.NavarathnaDH,RobertsDD,MunasingheJ,LizakMJ.Imaging
Candidainfectionsinthehost.MethodsMolBiol.
2016;1356:69–78.
32.SinghA,VermaR,MurariA,AgrawalA.Oralcandidiasis:an
overview.JOralMaxillofacPathol.2014;18:S81–S85.
33.SobelJD.Genitalcandidiasis.Medicine(Baltimore).
2014;42:364–368.
34.SobelJD.Recurrentvulvovaginalcandidiasis.AmJObstet
Gynecol.2015.
35.RamosLS,BarbedoLS,Braga-SilvaLA,dosSantosALS,Pinto
MR,SgarbiDBG.Proteaseandphospholipaseactivitiesof
Candidaspp.isolatedfromcutaneouscandidiasis.Rev IberoamMicol.2015;32:122–125.
36.NobileCJ,JohnsonAD.Candidaalbicansbiofilmsandhuman
disease.AnnuRevMicrobiol.2015;69:71–92.
37.BennettRJ.TheparasexuallifestyleofCandidaalbicans.Curr
OpinMicrobiol.2015;28:10–17.
38.WhibleyN,GaffenSL.BeyondCandidaalbicans:mechanisms
ofimmunitytonon-albicansCandidaspecies.Cytokine.
2015;76:42–52.
39.RossoniRD,BarbosaJO,VilelaSFG,etal.Competitive
interactionsbetweenC.albicans,C.glabrataandC.krusei
duringbiofilmformationanddevelopmentofexperimental
candidiasis.PLOSONE.2015;10:e0131700.
40.AsnerSA,GiulieriS,DieziM,MarchettiO,SanglardD.
AcquiredmultidrugantifungalresistanceinCandida
lusitaniaeduringtherapy.AntimicrobAgentsChemother.
2015;59:7715–7722.
41.SzwedaP,GucwaK,KurzykE,etal.Essentialoils,silver
nanoparticlesandpropolisasalternativeagentsagainst
fluconazoleresistantCandidaalbicans,Candidaglabrataand
Candidakruseiclinicalisolates.IndianJMicrobiol.
2015;55:175–183.
42.DuncanVMS,O’NeilDA.Commercializationofantifungal
peptides.FungalBiolRev.2013;26:156–165.
43.NakatsujiT,GalloRL.Antimicrobialpeptides:oldmolecules
withnewideas.JInvestDermatol.2012;132:887–895.
44.ZasloffM.Antimicrobialpeptidesofmulticellularorganisms.
Nature.2002;415:389–395.
45.SorensenM,SorensenSPL.Theproteinsinwhey.Compte
rendudesTravduLabCarlsberg,SerChim.1940;23:55–99.
46.JohansonB.Isolationofaniron-containingredproteinfrom
humanmilk.ActaChemScand.1960;14:510–512.
47.MassonPL,HeremansJF.Lactoferrininmilkfromdifferent
species.CompBiochemPhysiolPartBCompBiochem.
1971;39:119–213.
48.PawlikA,SenderG,Korwin-KossakowskaA,OprzadekJ.
Immunomodulatoryandantimicrobialactivityoflactoferrin.
MedWeter.2014;70:209–213.
49.KanwarJR,RoyK,PatelY,etal.Multifunctionalironbound
lactoferrinandnanomedicinalapproachestoenhanceits
bioactivefunctions.Molecules.2015;20:9703–9731.
50.TauberPF,ZaneveldLJ,ProppingD,SchumacherGF.
Componentsofhumansplitejaculates.I.Spermatozoa,
fructose,immunoglobulins,albumin,lactoferrin,transferrin
andotherplasmaproteins.JReprodFertil.1975;43:249–267.
51.LevayPF,ViljoenM.Lactoferrin:ageneralreview.
Haematologica.1995;80:252–267.
52.KijlstraA,JeurissenSH,KoningKM.Lactoferrinlevelsin
normalhumantears.BrJOphthalmol.1983;67:
199–202.
53.FarnaudS,EvansRW.Lactoferrin—amultifunctionalprotein
withantimicrobialproperties.MolImmunol.2003;40:395–405.
54.CohenMS,BritiganBE,FrenchM,BeanK.Preliminary
observationsonlactoferrinsecretioninhumanvaginal
mucus:variationduringthemenstrualcycle,evidenceof
hormonalregulation,andimplicationsforinfectionwith
Neisseriagonorrhoeae.AmJObstetGynecol.
1987;157:1122–1125.
55.González-ChávezSA,Arévalo-GallegosS,Rascón-CruzQ.
Lactoferrin:structure,functionandapplications.IntJ
AntimicrobAgents.2009;33,301.e1–8.
56.EmeryT.Irondeprivationasabiologicaldefence
mechanism.Nature.1980;287:776–777.
57.KanyshkovaTG,BabinaSE,SemenovDV,etal.Multiple
enzymicactivitiesofhumanmilklactoferrin.EurJBiochem.
2003;270:3353–3361.
58.García-MontoyaIA,CendónTS,Arévalo-GallegosS,
Rascón-CruzQ.Lactoferrinamultiplebioactiveprotein:an
overview.BiochimBiophysActa.2012;1820:226–236.
59.UlvatneH,HauklandHH,OlsvikO,VorlandLH,Lactoferricin
B.LactoferricinBcausesdepolarizationofthecytoplasmic
membraneofEscherichiacoliATCC25922andfusionof
negativelychargedliposomes.FEBSLett.2001;492:62–65.
60.YemetsAI,TanasienkoIV,KrasylenkoYA,BlumeYB.
Plant-basedbiopharmingofrecombinanthumanlactoferrin.
CellBiolInt.2014;38:989–1002.
61.BrouwerCPJM,RahmanM,WellingMM.Discoveryand
developmentofasyntheticpeptidederivedfromlactoferrin
forclinicaluse.Peptides.2011;32:1953–1963.
62.VenkateshMP,RongL.Humanrecombinantlactoferrinacts
synergisticallywithantimicrobialscommonlyusedin
neonatalpracticeagainstcoagulase-negativestaphylococci
andCandidaalbicanscausingneonatalsepsis.JMedMicrobiol.
2008;57:1113–1121.
63.VenkateshM,RongL,RaadI,VersalovicJ.Novelsynergistic
antibiofilmcombinationsforsalvageofinfectedcatheters.J
MedMicrobiol.2009;58:936–944.
64.TanidaT,RaoF,HamadaT,UetaE,OsakiT.Lactoferrin
peptideincreasesthesurvivalofCandidaalbicans-inoculated
micebyupregulatingneutrophilandmacrophagefunctions,
especiallyincombinationwithamphotericinBand
granulocyte-macrophagecolony-stimulatingfactor.Infect
Immun.2001;69:3883–3890.
65.OkamotoT,TanidaT,WeiB,UetaE,YamamotoT,OsakiT.
Regulationoffungalinfectionbyacombinationof
amphotericinBandpeptide2,alactoferrinpeptidethat
activatesneutrophils.ClinDiagnLabImmunol.
2004;11:1111–1119.
66.SiddiqueS,PerveenZ,NawazS,ShahzadK,AliZ.Chemical
compositionandantimicrobialactivitiesofessentialoilsof
sixspeciesfromfamilyMyrtaceae.JEssentOilBearPlants.
2015;18:950–956.
67.GeY,GeM.DistributionofMelaleucaalternifoliaessentialoil
inliposomeswithTween80additionandenhancementof
invitroantimicrobialeffect.JExpNanosci.2015;1:14.
68.Bustos-SeguraC,KülheimC,FoleyW.Effectsofterpene
chemotypesofMelaleucaalternifoliaontwospecialistleaf
beetlesandsusceptibilitytomyrtlerust.JChemEcol.
2015;41:937–947.
69.MillerC.Pouringahealingoilovertroubledwaters.AustDr.
70.CaloJR,CrandallPG,O’BryanCA,RickeSC.Essentialoilsas
antimicrobialsinfoodsystems—areview.FoodControl.
2015;54:111–119.
71.MartínezA,RojasN,GarcíaL,GonzálezF,DomínguezM,
CatalánA.InvitroactivityofterpenesagainstCandida
albicansandultrastructuralalterations.OralSurgOralMed OralPatholOralRadiol.2014;118:553–559.
72.ZoreGB,ThakreAD,JadhavS,KaruppayilSM.Terpenoids
inhibitCandidaalbicansgrowthbyaffectingmembrane
integrityandarrestofcellcycle.Phytomedicine.
2011;18:1181–1190.
73.KhanMSA,MalikA,AhmadI.Anti-candidalactivityof
essentialoilsaloneandincombinationwithamphotericinB
orfluconazoleagainstmulti-drugresistantisolatesof
Candidaalbicans.MedMycol.2012;50:33–42.
74.deCamposRasteiroVM,daCostaACBP,AraújoCF,etal.
EssentialoilofMelaleucaalternifoliaforthetreatmentoforal
candidiasisinducedinanimmunosuppressedmousemodel.
BMCComplementAlternMed.2014;14:489.
75.PachavaKR,NadendlaLK,AlluriLSC,TahseenH,SajjaNP.
Invitroantifungalevaluationofdenturesoftliner
incorporatedwithteatreeoil:anewtherapeuticapproach
towardsdenturestomatitis.JClinDiagnRes.
2015;9:ZC62–ZC64.
76.SharmaS,HegdeV.Comparativeevaluationofantifungal
activityofmelaleucaoilandfluconazolewhenincorporated
intissueconditioner:aninvitrostudy.JProsthodont.
2014;23:367–373.
77.DalwaiS,RodriguesSJ,BaligaS,etal.Comparative
evaluationofantifungalactionofteatreeoil,chlorhexidine
gluconateandfluconazoleonheatpolymerizedacrylic
denturebaseresin—aninvitrostudy.Gerodontology.2014.
78.BerenbaumMC.Amethodfortestingforsynergywithany
numberofagents.JInfectDis.1978;137:122–130.
79.vanVuurenSF,SulimanS,ViljoenAM.Theantimicrobial
activityoffourcommercialessentialoilsincombination
withconventionalantimicrobials.LettApplMicrobiol.
2009;48:440–446.
80.RosatoA,VitaliC,PiarulliM,MazzottaM,ArgentieriMP,
MallamaciR.Invitrosynergicefficacyofthecombinationof
NystatinwiththeessentialoilsofOriganumvulgareand
PelargoniumgraveolensagainstsomeCandidaspecies.
Phytomedicine.2009;16:972–975.
81.DiVitoM,MattarelliP,ModestoM,etal.Invitroactivityof
teatreeoilvaginalsuppositoriesagainstCandidaspp.and
probioticvaginalmicrobiota.PhytotherRes.
2015;29:1628–1633.
82.KonK,RaiM.Combiningplantessentialoilsand
antimycoticsincopingwithantimycotic-resistantCandida
species.In:Razzaghi-AbyanehM,RaiM,eds.Antifungal
MetabolitesfromPlants.SpringerBerlinHeidelberg; 2013:263–281.
83.HamedI,ÖzogulF,RegensteinJM.Industrialapplicationsof
crustaceanby-products(chitin,chitosan,and
chitooligosaccharides):areview.TrendsFoodSciTechnol.
2016;48:40–50.
84.PedroHSS,FrancinalvaDM,MartinaGOP,etal.Antimicrobial
potentialofchitosan.AfricanJMicrobiolRes.2015;9:
147–154.
85.SolimanAM,FahmySR,MohamedWA.Therapeuticefficacy
ofchitosanagainstinvasivecandidiasisinmice.JBasicAppl
Zool.2015;72:163–172.
86.Senyi ˘gitZA,KaravanaSY,Erac¸B,GürselO,LimoncuMH,
Balo ˘gluE.Evaluationofchitosanbasedvaginalbioadhesive
gelformulationsforantifungaldrugs.ActaPharm.
2014;64:139–156.
87.ChhonkerYS,PrasadYD,ChandasanaH,etal.
Amphotericin-Bentrappedlecithin/chitosannanoparticles
forprolongedocularapplication.IntJBiolMacromol.
2015;72:1451–1458.
88.ParkerAC,RhodesC,JenningsJA,etal.Preliminary
evaluationoflocaldrugdeliveryofamphotericinBand
invivodegradationofchitosanandpolyethyleneglycol
blendedsponges.JBiomedMaterResBApplBiomater.