• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Radiol Bras vol.45 número5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Radiol Bras vol.45 número5"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

V

Radiol Bras. 2012 Set/Out;45(5):V

EDITORIAL

In the current context of intense technological de-velopment at the dawn of a new era of online digital information, it never hurts to emphasize the concern regarding the education of future radiologists, pediatri-cians, and, specifically, of future pediatric radiologists. Such education must be directed towards guiding and stimulating the practice of medicine in such a manner to assure that the complementary exams, which are essential for diagnosis and treatment of pediatric con-ditions, achieve maximum benefit with the lowest pos-sible risk, avoiding unnecessary child exposure to im-mediate and future risk situations and protecting the child or adolescent from situations of physical suffer-ing or any kind of avoidable psychological aggravation. The incorporation of some simple actions into the daily practice can bring actual benefits in favor of pedi-atric imaging diagnosis, in an increasingly child-friendly atmosphere. Among such actions, the following should be highlighted:

The first simple action is to perform the lowest pos-sible number of complementary exams, giving priority to those which can actually generate the necessary, and many times sufficient, data to confirm/rule out a given diagnostic hypothesis. Such objective can, in most of times, be achieved by means of the optimization of the binomial comprised by the improvement in the perfor-mance of anamnesis and the physical examination, in

0100-3984 © Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem

Pediatric radiology: the necessity

of a child-friendly diagnosis

Radiologia pediátrica: quando o diagnóstico deve ser “amigo” da criança

Marcelo Valente1, Luiz Antonio Nunes de Oliveira2, Magda Carneiro-Sampaio3

1. PhD, MD, Neuroradiologist, Diagnostic Imaging Unit of Instituto da Criança – Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Univer-sidade de São Paulo (ICr/HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

2. Specialist in Imaging Diagnosis by Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), MD, Head of Diagnostic Imaging Unit at Instituto da Criança – Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Me-dicina da Universidade de São Paulo (ICr/HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected]

3. Full Professor, Department of Pediatrics, Director’s Council Chair-man, Instituto da Criança – Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (ICr/HC-FMUSP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

association with a deeper interaction between the pe-diatrician and the radiologist.

The second action is providing the child not only with appropriate accommodation with respect to ambi-ence, but also with the standardization of techniques and apparatuses suitable to the approaches specifically directed to each age group, guaranteeing a cheerful and friendly physical environment, capable of promoting tranquility and security both for the patient and his family members.

The third action is related to the choice of the diag-nostic method which allows for the most appropriate investigation in compliance with the ALARA principle for minimizing risks, emphasizing, in this case, the fundamentals defined by the Image Gently or Image Wisely protocols, where the choices take into consider-ation the techniques with the lowest doses or those which do not rely on ionizing radiation.

Similarly, the fourth action is related to the utili-zation of sedatives and anesthetics with the purpose of acquiring a technically perfect image. Such utilization can be reduced, provided the concept of technically suf-ficient and safe image for obtaining the necessary re-sponse to a specific clinical demand is adopted, restrict-ing the utilization of sedatives and anesthetics to very specific situations, taking into consideration the risks within the perspective of a minimally invasive approach. Huge battles have been fought in the current era of technological advances, sometimes against the exces-sive utilization of ionizing radiation, other times in the practice of a preventive and judicialized medicine, and sometimes in the administrative field, facing the never ending pressure to reduce costs.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Titular Member of Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diag- nóstico por Imagem (CBR), MD, Radiologist, Substitute Profes- sor, Department of Radiology, Universidade Federal de

MD, General Ultrasonography Specialist, Imaging Clinic Physician, Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, University Hospital in Federal University in Maranhão (HU-UFMA), São Luís, MA,

Membro Titular do Colégio Bra- sileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), Professor Substituto do Departa- mento de Radiologia do Hospital das Clínicas da

Titular Member of Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), Substitute Professor of Radiology at Hospital das Clíni- cas da Universidade Federal de

Especialista em Diagnóstico por Imagem pelo Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), Médico Chefe do Serviço de Diagnóstico por Imagem do Instituto da

MD, Radiologist, Preceptor of Medical Residency of Radiology and Imaging Diagnosis at Hospital de Base do Distrito Federal (HBDF), Brasília, DF, Brazil.. MD, Radiologist, Head

Physicians Assistants, Instituto de Radiologia – Hospital das Clínicas da Facul- dade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (InRad/HC-FMUSP), Radiologists at Imaging Department

Titular Member of Colégio Brasileiro de Radiologia e Diagnóstico por Imagem (CBR), Invited Professor at School of Medicine, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo