Anomalous Shift of the Recombination Energy in
Single Asymmetric Quantum Wells
N.O. Dantas a
, FanyaoQu a
, and P.C. Morais b
a
UniversidadeFederaldeUberl^andia, FaculdadedeFsica,CEP38400-902,Uberl^andia-MG,Brazil
b
UniversidadedeBraslia,Institutode Fsica,N ucleodeFsicaAplicada
CEP70919-970,Braslia-DF,Brazil
Receivedon23April,2001
Self-consistentnumericalcalculationandphotoluminescence(PL)measurementshavebeenusedto
investigatethetemperaturedependenceoftheopticalStarkeectinn-dopedGaAs/AlGaAssingle
asymmetricquantumwells(SAQWs),grownby molecularbeamepitaxy. Inthe low-temperature
regime(5 to 40K) a remarkable blueshift (9.8meV)is observedinthe PL peak energy, as the
opticalexcitationintensityincreasesfrom0.03to90W/cm 2
. Theblueshiftiswellexplainedbythe
reductionofthetwo-dimensionalelectrongas(2DEG)density,duetoacharge-transfermechanism.
Atabout80K,however,ananomalousbehaviorofthePLpeak energywas found,i.e. aredshift
hasbeenobservedastheoptical excitationintensityincreases. Thisanomalousbehaviorhasbeen
explainedbycombiningtheeectsofbandgaprenormalization,bandbending,temperaturedepen-
denceofthebandgap,temperaturedependenceofthe2DEGdensity,andtemperaturedependence
ofthefundamentalenergyposition.
I Introduction
One-sidemodulation-dopedorsingleasymmetricquan-
tum wells (SAQWs) have been used as ideal systems
to investigate dierent aspects related to many-body
eectsintwo-dimensional(2D),one-componentcarrier
plasmas[1]. TheSAQWisaspecialcaseofmodulation-
doped quantumwell(MDQW)where theremotedop-
ingismadeonlyinonesideofthesinglequantumwell.
The typicalgrowthprole of aGaAs/AlGaAsSAQW
includes athickGaAs buerlayerontopof theGaAs
substrate, a short-period GaAs/AlGaAs superlattice,
the GaAs SAQW, the undoped AlGaAs spacer layer,
the n- or p-type doped AlGaAs layer, and nally the
GaAs cap layer. Among the many-body eects inves-
tigated using SAQWs are the Fermi-edge singularity
(FES) [2], the band gap renormalization [3], and di-
mensionalitycrossover[4], allof themstrongly depen-
dent upon the carrier temperature and their density
(N
S
). Forinstance,thelowtemperatureandhighcar-
rierconcentrationfavortheFESobservationinPLex-
periments, while FES would be smeared out by high
temperatureandlowcarrierdensity. BesidesFES,band
gap renormalization also strongly depends upon the
carrierdensity,N
S
,accordingto(N
S )
. Theexponent
is relatedto thedimensionalityof thesystem,being
=1/2 for three-dimensional (3D) carrier plasma and
size the great interest of using SAQWs to investigate
many-body eects in 2D semiconductor heterostruc-
tures,oncethecarriergasdensityinsuchstructurecan
becontinuouslyvariedfromitsmaximumvaluedownto
zero. Continuouschangeofthe 2Dcarrierdensity has
beenachievedbyapplyingabiasvoltageinaeldeect
transistor conguration[5] {electric Stark eect. Al-
ternatively,continuouschangeofthe2Dcarrierdensity
has been obtainedthroughillumination of thesample
with increasing optical excitation intensity (P) { op-
tical Stark eect. The signature of the optical Stark
eect is a remarkableenergy shift (typically 10 meV)
inthefundamentalopticaltransition. Theexplanation
ofthePLblue shiftwiththeincreaseofthelaserexci-
tation intensitywasrstput forwardby Chaveset al.
[6]. Thereupon, it was further conrmed by following
works [3]. The established optical control mechanism
used to explain the experiment requires illumination
with photonshavingenergy higherthantheband gap
of theundoped spacer layer. Theattentionis focused
on the electron-hole pairs photocreated in the spacer
layer. Inthen-typedopedstructure,thephotocreated
electron initially moves back to the spatially distant
donorswhile the photocreatedhole is driftedinto the
quantumwellbythebuilt-inelectriceld,thererecom-
bining with 2D electrons. Later on, the photocreated
electron movesfrom thedonor into the quantum well
bytunnelingthroughthespacerlayer. Atagivenopti-
cal excitation intensitythesteady-state2DEGdensity
is lowerthan thedensity (N 0
S
)at ornear zeroexcita-
tion. Althoughthecharge-transfermechanismhasbeen
successfullyusedtoexplaintheexperimental,allthere-
portedstudiesconcerningtheopticalStark eecthave
beenperformedat low-temperatures. However,thein-
uence of nite temperatures on the optical Stark ef-
fect is obviously important for both applied purposes
and fundamental physics. Nevertheless, the tempera-
ture dependence of optical Stark eect has not been
investigated yet,in spiteof thehugetechnologicalim-
pact ofthemicro-electronic-opticaldevicesandoptical
communications,bothoperatingatnitetemperatures.
Investigationof theeectsofnitetemperaturesupon
theopticalStarkeectisthemainissueofthepresent
study.
II Experimental details and re-
sults
ThePLexperimentsreportedinthisstudywerecarried
out using two GaAs/Al
0:35 Ga
0:65
As SAQW samples
(W1506 and W1413), grown by molecular beam epi-
taxy. SampleW1506consistsofasemi-insulatingGaAs
substratefollowedbya1.3m-thickGaAsbuerlayer,
aGaAs/Al
0:35 Ga
0:65
Assuperlattice (typically735
A
+ 8100
A), andby thenominally 152
A-thickGaAs
SAQW. The2Delectrongas(2DEG) inside theGaAs
SAQW is a result of the electron-transfer, through a
295
A-thickundopedAl
0:35 Ga
0:65
Asspacerlayer,from
a385
A Si-dopedAl
0:35 Ga
0:65
Aslayer. A250
A-thick
GaAs caplayerwasgrownontopof theoverallstruc-
ture. SamplesW1413andW1506havesimilargrowth
proles. Inthe W1413sample, theasymmetric quan-
tumwellwidthis150
A,thethicknessofspacerlayeris
300
A,andthethicknessoftheSi-dopedAl
0:35 Ga
0:65 As
barrierregionis380
A.Bothsampleshaveelectronmo-
bility higher than 410 4
cm 2
/Vs at liquid Helium
temperature. Sampleswereopticallyexcitedabovethe
band gap of theundoped Al
0:35 Ga
0:65
As spacerlayer,
using the 5145
A argon-ion laser line. The PL spec-
trawererecordedusingaSPEX-750Mmonochromator
equipped with a Joban-Yvon CCD 2000800-3. The
NEOCERA LTC-11 temperature controller was used
during thePLmeasurements.
Fig. 1showsthePLspectraofsampleW1506under
P =0.4W/cm 2
,atdierenttemperatures(10,30,50,
and80K).ThePLpeak-A,locatedat1521.7meV(10
K),isassociatedtothen=0transition,i.e. between
the ground state conduction subband to the ground
stateheavy-holesubband ofthe GaAs SAQW.As the
opticalexcitationintensityincreasesthe2DEGdensity
decreases due to the electron-transfer mechanism. At
2
outfromtheGaAsSAQW.Then,theelectron-transfer
turnsthe152
A-thickGaAsSAQWintoanalmostper-
fectsquare potentialwell. Inthis case, thecalculated
n =0 recombination energy is 1538.7 meV and the
excitonbinding energy associated to theground state
in the GaAs SAQW is 8.2 meV. Thus, a free exciton
transitioninasquareGaAspotentialwellwouldbeex-
pected to occurat about 1530.5meV. Note the good
agreementbetween thecalculatedvalue (1530.5meV)
andtheobservedPLpeak-A position (1531.7meV) at
higheropticalexcitation intensity(P =90W/cm 2
).
Figure 1. PL spectra of sample W1506 under P = 0.4
W/cm 2
,atdierenttemperatures(10,30, 50,and80K).
The PLpeak-B, located at 1514.8 meV (10 K), is
attributed to the recombination from the thick GaAs
buer layer. It is worthy to mention that the PL
peaks A and B are very much close together in the
weakopticalexcitationintensityregime,becauseofthe
strongband bendingandbandgap renormalizationef-
fects. However,asP increasesthePLpeak-A tendsto
separate from the PL peak-B. Finally, they are com-
pletely separated at the higher optical excitation in-
tensity regime. Moreover,PL peaks A and B demon-
stratequitedierent temperature dependence. Asex-
pected, PL peak-B shows normal temperature depen-
dence,onceintensityandenergypeakpositiondecrease
monotonicallywiththeincreaseintemperature. Incon-
trast,PLpeak-Aexperiencesadierentbehavioronce
its intensity with respect to the PL peak-B intensity
increasesmonotonically, asthetemperatureincreases.
ThePLpeak-C(1493.8meV)isassignedtothecarbon
acceptortransitionintheGaAssubstrate. PLpeaksC
ior,asfarastheincreaseoftheopticalexcitationinten-
sityisconcerned. Incontrast,PLpeaksCandDshow
dierenttemperaturedependence. Thus, thePL peak
D may originatefrom the residualacceptor transition
in thenominally undoped GaAs SAQW,accompanied
by LO-phonon emission. Finally, PL peak E (1668.7
meV)hasitspositionalmostindependentoftheoptical
excitation intensity, being associated to theinterband
transition from the short-periodGaAs/Al
0:35 Ga
0:65 As
superlattice.
Fig. 2 shows the optical excitation intensity de-
pendence of the recombination energy of the W1413
sample,atdierenttemperatures. Atlowtemperature
(10K), astrong blue shift in recombinationenergy, as
theoptical excitation intensity increases,is found. As
thetemperatureincreasesfrom 10Kto40K,theblue
shiftin recombination energyis still observed, though
reduced from 9.2 meV (10K) to 8.4 meV (40K). As
thetemperatureisfurtherincreasedabreakdownofthe
blueshiftisobserved,asshownbytheopencircles(80
K) in Fig. 2. Above about 80 K the recombination
energydecreasesmonotonicallyasthetemperaturein-
creases. At100K,aslightblueshift(2meV)hasbeen
found.
III Discussion
Atverylowtemperature,residualacceptorstatesplaya
keyroleintheopticalpropertiesofintentionallydonor-
doped semiconductormaterials. Undersuch condition
fewacceptorstatesaectthepositionoftheFermien-
ergy, forelectronsfrom donorsgetcaptured at accep-
tor sites,resultingin someionizeddonors. Under low
optical excitation intensity, thephotogenerated excess
holes collected by the SAQW are less than the num-
beroftheionizedacceptorsintroducedbytheresidual
doping. Then, the ionized residual acceptors rapidly
localizephotoholes. Since in k space thestate ofthe
localized holesis extended, recombinationof all occu-
pied conduction-band states with dierent k, from 0
up to the Fermi wavevector, k
F
, and localized holes
isallowed. Atasuitableacceptorconcentrationthere-
strictionofthek-selectionruleimposedontherecombi-
nationprocess isrelaxed. So,at lowtemperature,the
free photoelectron-localized-hole transitions dominate
theopticalemissionprocess. Sincethetrappingofholes
byelectronsisveryeÆcient,theopticaltransitionsre-
main k-nonconserving. As aconsequence, in SAQWs,
low-temperaturePLspectrapresentbroadandstep-like
bands with sharp edgesat theeective band gap and
attheFermi energycuto(seeFig. 1).
In SAQWs, the optical Stark eect clearly shows
three dierent behaviorsas a function of bothoptical
excitationintensityandtemperature(seeFig. 2). First,
at low opticalexcitation intensity,and in thetemper-
turedependenceofthePLrecombinationenergyisob-
served. As thetemperature increasesfrom5to 100K
thePLpeakenergymovesupwardstoapeakvalue,at
intermediatetemperatures,tofurthercomedownatthe
high-temperatureend(100K).Second,athighoptical
excitation intensity, the PLpeak energyassociated to
the SAQW presents normal temperature dependence,
i.e. thePLpeakenergymovesmonotonically tolower
energy as the temperature increasesfrom 5to 100 K.
Third,a continuoustransition betweenthe twodier-
entregimeshasbeenobservedatintermediatevaluesof
opticalexcitationintensity.
Figure2. Recombinationenergyasafunctionoftheoptical
excitationintensity,forsampleW1413, atT=10K(open
squares),T=40K(soliduptriangles),T=80K(opencir-
cles),and (soliddowntriangles). Thelinesare justguides
fortheeye.
To understand the complexfeatures in theoptical
spectraofSAQWs,particularlytheirdependenceupon
the optical excitation intensity and temperature, the
combined eects of band gap energy shrinkage, band
bending, band gap renormalization, temperature de-
pendence of the 2DEG, and relaxation of ionized ac-
ceptorsshouldbetakenintoaccount. Thismeansthat
a quantitative description of the temperature depen-
dence ofboth 2DEGdensity andground state energy
hastobeperformed. Therefore,self-consistentcalcula-
tion,which numericallysolvesthecoupledSchrodinger
andPoissonequations,hasbeencarriedoutforsample
W1413. Thecorrespondentresultwillbepublished in
a forthcoming paper. The following parameters have
beenusedinthecalculation: donorboundenergyxed
at E
D
= 50meV, lowfrequency dielectricconstantin
thewell("
W
=13.2"
0
)andinthebarrier("
B
=12.2"
0 ),
andeectiveelectronmassinthewell(m W
e
=0.067m
0 )
and in the barrier (m B
e
=0.092m
0
). It is found that
theelectronarealdensityincreasesasthetemperature
increases. Inaddition,thehigherthedonorconcentra-
tionthelargertheelectronarealdensityanditsincreas-
ingrate. Reductionoftheelectronfundamentalenergy
tually, in the low optical excitation intensity regime,
the blue shift due to the electron-transfer mechanism
is negligible. Asthetemperatureincreasesthermalef-
fectstend tospreadthe2DEGoverthefull densityof
states. Then, thePLpeakenergyshiftstowardhigher
values. Ontheotherside,asthetemperatureincreases,
theshrinkageofthebandgapandthereductionofthe
groundstateenergyleadtoaredshiftofthePLpeak
energy. Reduction of the PLpeak energy, due to the
shrinkage of the band gap energy, is about 8.5 meV
(0.69meV)asthetemperatureincreasesfrom40to80
K (10 to 40 K). Then, in the low optical excitation
regime and below80K,the resultanteect leadsto a
blueshiftinthePLpeakenergy. Withfurtherincrease
intemperature(above80K),theshrinkageoftheband
gap becomes dominant (12.1meV in thetemperature
rangeof 80to100K),leadingto aredshift inthePL
peak energy. At intermediatevaluesof optical excita-
tion intensities, however,the electron-transfer mecha-
nismgovernstheopticalemissionprocess,reducingthe
2DEG density in the SAQW. The band bending and
the band gap renormalizationdecrease as the optical
excitation intensity increases. ThePL peak energyis
expectedto movetowardhigher energyvalues. Even-
tually, in the high optical excitation intensity regime,
all electrons are removed out from the SAQW by the
photogeneratedholes. TheSAQWturnsintoaperfect
square potentialwell. Then,asexpected, normaltem-
perature dependence of the PL recombination energy
aswellassymmetricPLspectraareobserved. Inother
words, theanomalous dependence of the PL recombi-
intensity increases. This feature supports the picture
ofthecompetitionbetweentheopticalStarkeectand
theelectron-transfermechanisminexplainingtheopti-
calpropertiesofSAQWs,atnitetemperaturesandin
awiderangeofopticalexcitationintensities.
In summary, the band gap renormalization, band
bending, temperature dependence of the 2DEG den-
sity, and temperature dependence of the fundamental
energy position are all coupled together to determine
theverycomplexbehaviorof theSAQW PLpeak po-
sition.
Acknowledgments
SupportfromtheBrazilianagenciesFAPMIG,FAP-
DF,andCNPqisgratefullyacknowledged.
References
[1] P.Hawrylak,Phys.Rev.B44,6262(1991).
[2] FanyaoQu,N.O.Dantas,andP.C. Morais,Europhys.
Lett.53,790(2001).
[3] A.J.C. Cardoso, Fanyao Qu and P.C. Morais, Phys.
Rev.B60,4501 (1999).
[4] FanyaoQuand P.C. Morais,IEEE J.QuantumElec-
tron.36,348(2000).
[5] C.Delalande,J.A.Brum,G.Bastard,SolidStateCom-
mun.59,613(1986).
[6] A.S. Chaves, A.F.S. Penna, J.M. Worlock, G.
Weimann,andW.Schlapp,Surf.Sci.170,618(1986).