• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Life expectancy by sex, age, and income level

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Life expectancy by sex, age, and income level"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

Table 2. PYLL rates per 100,000 population, PYLL rate ratios, and average PYLL per death of the 5 leading causes

of unintentional injury in Canada, by sex, 1985.

Cause of death PYLL rate Rate Average PYLL per 100,000 ratio* per death MVTA

Male 798.8 35.4

Female 300.1 2.7 33.6

Drowning

Male 98.0 36.5

Female 25.2 3.9 42.4

Fire and Flames

Male 81.5 34.9

Female 39.9 2.0 35.5

Poisonings

Male 47.2 27.2

Female 18.7 2.5 26.1

Falis

Male 59.4 23.4

Female 8.3 7.1 14.7

* Male Rate/ Female Rate

injury morbidity and mortality(3). Increased governmental and private support of the activities of the various groups involved in injury prevention should be emphasized.

References

(1) Committee on Trauma Research. Injury' in America.

National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 1985.

(2) Stickle, G. What Priority Human Life? Am J Public Health

55:1692-8,1965.

(3) Premature Mortality due to Unintentional Injuries -United States, 1983. MMWR 35:353-6,1986.

(Source: Leonard MacWilliam and Louise Fortier. First published in Chronic Diseases in Canada,

Vol. 8, No. 1, June 1987.)

Life Expectancy by Sex, Age, and Income Level

The purpose of this article is to present an updated overview of the variations in life expectancy by income level in Canada. Mortality data for 1984 were retrieved from the Canadian Mortality Data-base of the Vital Statistics Division of Statistics Canada. Income categories were determined using the quintile of the median household income of the census tracts of Canada's census metropolitan areas. The relative risks of death by age and sex for each income level, in reference to the highest income group, were those derived in the initial study by Wigle and Mao(1). Age-sex specific mortality rates for 1984 by income level were calculated by applying the 1984 mortality rate and the relative risk of death to the Bayesian formula(2) and then used to con-struct life tables following a method developed by Chiang(3).

Life expectancy is a hypothetical measure and indicator of current health and mortality condi-tions(4). The life expectancy according to income level can be used to study the association between income and the risk of death due to all causes. The study showed that life expectancy increased mono-tonically with income level. The difference in life expectancy by income level was greater for males than females at all ages. The difference for each sex was greatest at birth, relatively constant up to age 35

and declined rapidly after age 45. For females over 55 and males over 75, this difference was less than one year.

The relationship between income level and life expectancy must be carefully interpreted; an associ-ation should not be confused as a causal relassoci-ation. Income level is correlated with factors such as education, occupation and lifestyle which can independently contribute to the risk of disease. Chronic disease and disability may cause a decline in income level due to loss of employment or a decline injob status and pay; thus, a relatively low income at the time of death can be a result of disease as opposed to a cause(l). The correlation observed from the life table does not imply that income per se directly influences life expectancy. Income should be considered as a socioeconomic status indicator. The results indicate that the residents of high socioeconomic status areas live longer than those of the low socioeconomic status areas.

References

(I) Wigle, D.T.. Mao, Y. Morrality by Income Level in Urban

Canada. Health and Welfare Canada 1980.

(2) Ash, R. B. Basic Probabilit y Theory. John Wiley and Sons, Toronto 1970.

(2)

(3) Chiang, C. L. The Life Table and its Applications. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar 1984.

(4) Last. J.M. A Dictionary' of Epidemiology. Oxford Uni-versity Press, Toronto 1983.

(Source: Anne-Marie Ugnat and Elen Mark. Adapted from an article first published in

Chronic Diseases in Canada, Vol. 8, No. 1, June 1987.)

Diseases Subject to the International

Health Regulations

Total cholera, yellow fever, and plague cases and deaths

reported in the Region of the Americas

as of 31 December 1987

Country and Cholera Yellow fever Plague

administrative subdivision cases Cases Deaths cases

BOLIVIA - 5 11 2

La Paz 15 11

Santa Cruz - - 2

BRAZIL - 7 6 3

Amazonas I I

Bahía - - 3

Goiás - 6 5

COLOMBIA - 4 2

Antioquia 2

-Santander 2 2

PERU 156 149

-Ayacucho - 15 15

Cuzco 19 19

-Huánuco - 35 35

Junín 32 29

Loreto - 1 I

Madre de Dios 22 22

Pasco - 1I

San Martín - 27 23

Ucayali - 4 4

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 5 - 12

Arizona - - 2

Colorado 2

Guam (West Pacific) la

Idaho

Louisiana 4

Montana - - - I

New Mexico - 5b

Oregon I

a Imported case.

b Includes two suspected cases.

in

e

.

I I

Imagem

Table  2. PYLL  rates per  100,000  population,  PYLL  rate ratios, and average  PYLL  per death of the  5  leading  causes

Referências

Documentos relacionados

10-year mortality rates by age and sex.. Among the variables considered in the pres- ent analysis, only level of schooling and common mental disorders did not show an independent

*** Overall and sex-specifi c MR for Brazil and regions, as well as annual Guarani mortality rates, specifi c for ICD-10 chapters, were standardized by age and sex by the

The independent variables were divided into the following two groups: sociode- mographic (sex; age range; occupation; mari- tal status; educational level; family income; and type

ABSTRACT: Objective: Assess the completeness of the DataSUS SIM death-count registry, by sex and Brazilian state, and estimate the probability of adult mortality (45q15), by sex

In addition to the dependent variable ‘amputation’, the independent variables analyzed were related either to people (age, sex, origin, educational level and income); to

Age-adjusted mortality rates, crude mortality rates, and age-specific mortality rates by geographic region of Brazil and for the entire country were analyzed for all cancers

Standardized mortality rates for the years 1991-2010 were corrected for sub notification and ill defined causes of death and calculated using sex specific five year age grades..

The number of expected deaths was obtained by multiplying the mortality rate from external causes of morbidity and mortality of the stan- dard population by age group (rates