• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.66 número4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. vol.66 número4"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto

(1)

REVISTA

BRASILEIRA

DE

ANESTESIOLOGIA

Publicação Oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia

www.sba.com.br

SCIENTIFIC

ARTICLE

The

effect

of

pheniramine

on

fentanyl-induced

cough:

a

randomized,

double

blinded,

placebo

controlled

clinical

study

Zakir

Arslan

a,∗

,

Eyup

Serhat

C

¸alık

b

,

Bekir

Kaplan

a

,

Elif

Oral

Ahiskalioglu

a

aRegionalTrainingandResearchHospital,DepartmentofAnesthesiologyandIntensiveCare,Erzurum,Turkey bRegionalTrainingandResearchHospital,DepartmentofCardiacSurgery,Erzurum,Turkey

Received28October2014;accepted26November2014 Availableonline22December2015

KEYWORDS

Fentanyl; Cough;

Pheniraminemaleat;

Anesthesia

Abstract

Backgroundandobjectives: Therearemanystudiesconductedonreducingthefrequencyand severityoffentayl-inducedcoughduringanesthesiainduction.Weproposethatpheniramine maleate,anantihistaminic,maysuppressthiscough.Weaimtoobservetheeffectof pheni-ramineonfentanyl-inducedcoughduringanesthesiainduction.

Methods:Thisisadouble-blinded,prospective,three-armparallel,randomizedclinicaltrial of120patientswithASA(AmericanSocietyofAnesthesiologists)physicalstatusIIIandIVwho aged≥18andscheduledforelectiveopenheartsurgeryduringgeneralanesthesia.Patients were randomly assigned to threegroups of 40 patients, using computer-generatedrandom numbers:placebogroup,pheniraminegroup,andlidocainegroup.

Results:Coughincidencedifferedsignificantlybetweengroups.Intheplacebogroup,37.5%of patientshadcough,whereasthefrequencywassignificantlydecreasedinpheniraminegroup (5%)and lidocainegroup (15%)(Fischer exact test,p=0.0007 andp=0.0188,respectively). Therewasnosignificantchangeincoughincidencebetweenpheniraminegroup(5%)and lido-caine group (15%) (Fischer exact test,p=0.4325). Coughseverity didalso change between groups.PostHoc testswithBonferronishowedthatmeancoughseverityinplacebodiffered significantly than that ofpheniramine group andlidocaine group (p<0.0001 andp=0.009, respectively).Therewasnosignificantchangeincoughseveritybetweenpheniraminegroup andlidocainegroup(p=0.856).

Conclusion: Intravenouspheniramineisaseffectiveaslidocaineinpreventingfentayl-induced cough.Ourresultsemphasizethatpheniramineisaconvenientdrugtodecreasethiscough. © 2015 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:zakir-arslan@hotmail.com(Z.Arslan). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.11.018

(2)

PALAVRAS-CHAVE

Fentanil; Tosse;

Maleatode

feniramina; Anesthesia

Efeitodefeniraminasobreatosseinduzidaporfentanil:estudoclínico,randômico, duplo-cegoecontroladocomplacebo

Resumo

Justificativaeobjetivos: Hámuitosestudossobreareduc¸ãodafrequênciaegravidadedatosse induzidaporfentanilduranteainduc¸ãodaanestesia.Propomosquemaleatodefeniramina,um anti-histamínico,podesuprimiressatosse.Nossoobjetivofoiobservaroefeitodefeniramina sobreatosseinduzidaporfentanilduranteainduc¸ãodaanestesia.

Métodos: Esteéumestudoclínicoprospectivo,detrêsbrac¸osparalelos,randômicoe duplo-cego,de120pacientescomestadofísicoASAIIIeIV(deacordocomaSociedadeAmericanade Anestesiologistas),comidades≥18anoseprogramadosparacirurgiacardíacaabertaeletiva sobanestesiageral.Ospacientesforamdivididosaleatoriamenteemtrêsgruposde40pacientes cada,usandonúmerosaleatóriosgeradosporcomputador:grupoplacebo,grupofeniraminae grupolidocaína.

Resultados: Aincidênciadetossediferiusignificativamenteentreosgrupos.Nogrupoplacebo, 37,5% dos pacientes apresentaram tosse, enquanto que afrequência foi significativamente reduzidanogrupofeniramina(5%)enogrupolidocaína(15%)(testeexatodeFischer,p=0,0007 ep=0,0188,respectivamente).Nãohouvealterac¸ãosignificativanaincidênciadetosseentre osgruposfeniramina(5%)elidocaína(15%)(testeexatodeFischer,p=0,4325).Agravidadeda tossetambémalterouentreosgrupos.TestesposthoccomBonferronimostraramuqueamédia dagravidadedatossenogrupoplacebodiferiusignificativamentedasmédiasdosgrupos feni-raminaelidocaína(p<0,0001ep=0,009,respectivamente).Nãohouvealterac¸ãosignificativa nagravidadedatosseentreogrupofeniraminaegrupolidocaína(p=0,856).

Conclusão:Feniraminaporviaintravenosapossuiamesmaeficáciaquelidocaínanaprevenc¸ão datosse induzidaporfentanil. Osresultados enfatizam quefeniraminaé um medicamento convenienteparadiminuiressatosse.

© 2015 Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. Este é um artigo Open Access sob a licença de CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Introduction

Intravenous fentanyl which is used mainly for induc-tion of anesthesia frequently causes an irritating cough in the patient.1 The prevalence of fentanyl-induced cough ranges from 21.6% to 74%.2---5 It is generally tran-sitory and limited, but it can be harmful in cases withincreasedintracranial,intraocular orintra-abdominal pressure;cerebralaneurysm,braintraumaandhernia, dis-sectingaortic aneurysm,pneumothoraxorreactiveairway disease.4---7 Although the mechanism of fentanyl-induced cough has not been fully clarified, it is thought that allergic mediators such as histamine may cause it.8 Var-ious medicaments and methods have been used with varying degrees of success to hinder or relieve this side-effect.2 One study reported that lidocaine 2mg/kg iv given one minute before fentanyl decreased the preva-lenceof coughfrom 65%(according tothe controlgroup) to 14%.6 Another study reported that iv fentanyl admin-isteredin dilutedformor more slowly markedlyhindered cough.9

Many solutions have been proposed for this cough of unidentified origin. We wanted to investigate the effect ofpheniramineonfentanyl-inducedcough.Thepurposeof thisstudywastocomparetheeffectoftheantihistaminic pheniramine maleate and lidocaine on fentanyl-induced cough.

Method

Design

This is a double-blinded,prospective, three-arm parallel, randomizedclinical trial conducted ina researchhospital between September2013 andApril 2014.The approval of theEthicsCommitteeofourhospitalandinformedconsent formsweretakenfromallpatientsparticipatinginthestudy (Decisionn◦2013/13).OnehundredandtwentyASA

(Amer-icanSociety ofAnesthesiologists) physical statusIIIandIV patients aged ≥18 and scheduled for elective open heart surgeryduringgeneralanesthesia,wererandomlyassigned tooneofthreegroupsof40patientseach,using computer-generated random numbers: placebo group, pheniramine group,andlidocainegroup.Dr.ZAwasresponsiblefordrug preparation and the allocationsequences (contained in a setofsealedenvelopes).Theobserversandallthepatients involvedinthestudywereblinded.

Inclusioncriteria

(3)

Table1 Patientcharacteristicsinthreegroups.

Feature Placebogroup(n=40) Pheniraminegroup(n=40) Lidocainegroup(n=40) p

Age(yr) 55.98±11.5 61.25±11.84 56.48±12.22 0.094

Male(%) 75 80 60 0.118

Weight(kg) 74.03±12.29 74.02±12.83 74.13±12.27 0.999

Smokers(%) 48.6 33.3 32.4 0.289

Ex-smokers(%) 21.7 14.3 10.7 0.544

Exclusioncriteria

Those who had premedication, pharyngitis in the last

<3 weeks,chronic obstructive pulmonary disease,chronic

cough,drugallergy,historyofasthma,treatmentwith

bron-chodilatorsorsteroidsforthelastonemonth,andwhowere

intheclassASA-Vwereexcluded.

Samplesize

Ourpower analysisshowedthatusinga sample sizeof 40

patientspergroupachieves82%powertodetectaneffect

size(W)of0.5using2degreesoffreedomChi-SquareTest

withasignificancelevel(alpha)of0.05.

Interventions

After the patients entered the operation room, vascular

accesswasestablishedbyplacinga22-Gcannulainoneof

theveinsintheforearm,andinfusionwithsaline3mL/kg

wasstarted. As noninvasive monitoring,

electrocardiogra-phy(ECG),bloodpressure(BP),andpulseoxygensaturation

(SpO2) were provided.Measurementswere made in every

5min. If needed (SpO2<95%), oxygen support (4L/min)

was given via an oxygen face mask. One minute before

inductionandfentanyladministration,pheniraminemaleate

45.5mgiv bolus (Avil,2mLampoule,Sandoz, Turkey)was

administeredto40patientsinthepheniraminegroup,

lido-caine (Aritmal 2%, 5mL, Osel drug, Turkey) 1mg/kg to

40 patients in the lidocaine group and saline 5mL to 40

patients in the placebo group, respectively. One minute

after the treatment, fentanyl 5␮g/kg iv bolus (Fentanyl

0.05mg/mL, 10mL ampoule, Johnson&Johnson, Belgium)

was given within 5s to the patients in each group. The

patients were observed for the side-effects of fentanyl,

and any side-effect seen was noted down. The

sever-ity of cough was recorded as mild (1---2), medium (3---5),

andsevere (>5).Following, inductionwasconducted with

propofol2.5mg/kgandrocuronium0.6mg/kg.Thepatients

were manually ventilated for 2.5min and then

orotra-cheal intubation wascompleted. The patients were then

mechanicallyventilated witha 7mL/kgtidal volumeat a

rate of 12 breaths per minute. Thereafter, invasive

arte-rialcatheterizationofleftradialarteryandcentralvenous

catheterizationtotherightinternaljugularveinwere

pro-vided.The anesthesiawas maintainedwith fusion of 50%

O2/air,5% desflurane,2---3␮g/kgremifentanyland

rocuro-nium(0.1mg/kg/30min).Aftertheoperationwasover,the

patientsweretransferredtotheIntensiveCareUnitof

Car-diovascularSurgeryClinicasintubated,monitored(invasive

blood pressure, SpO2, and ECG), and manually ventilated

withoxygen8L/min.

Statistics

Thefrequenciesofcoughingandtheproportionsofsexand

ASAclasswerecomparedusingthechi-squaretestorFisher’s

exacttest. One-way ANOVA analysisof variancewas used

tocomparetheageandweightamongthefourgroupsand

PostHoctestswithBonferronicorrectionwasusedtodefine

whichgroupsdiffer.p<0.05wasconsideredasstatistically

significant.

Results

Therewasnostatisticallysignificantdifferencebetweenthe

threegroupswithregardtoage,gender,weight,and

smok-inghabits(p>0.05forall,Table1).

Coughincidence differedsignificantly between groups. Intheplacebogroup,37.5%ofpatientshadcough,whereas thefrequency wassignificantly decreased in pheniramine group(5%) and lidocaine group (15%) (Fischer exact test, p=0.0007 and p=0.0188, respectively; Table 2). There was no significant change in cough incidence between

Table2 Thecomparisonofcoughcharacteristicsinthreegroups.

Variables Placebogroup(n=40) Pheniraminegroup(n=40) Lidocainegroup(n=40) p

Coughseverity(0---3) 0.63±0.93 0.05±0.22 0.2±0.52 <0.0001a

Coughincidence,n(%) 37.5(15) 5(2) 15(6) <0.0001

Nocough 62.5(25) 95(38) 85(34)

Mild 17.5(7) 5(2) 10(4)

Moderate 15(6) 0 5(2)

Severe 5(2) 0 0

(4)

pheniraminegroup(5%)andlidocainegroup(15%)(Fischer exacttest,p=0.4325).

Cough severity did also change between groups. Post HoctestswithBonferronishowedthatmeancoughseverity inplacebo differed significantlythan that of pheniramine groupandlidocainegroup(p<0.0001andp=0.009, respec-tively).Therewas nosignificant change in cough severity betweenpheniraminegroupandlidocainegroup(p=0.856).

Discussion

Wesawthatadministrationoffentanylivboluscausedcough in37.5%ofthepatients.Wealsofoundthatfentanyl-induced coughcouldbeinhibitedbypheniramineandlidocaine.The mostimportantfindingofthisstudywasthatpheniramine maleate,anantihistaminic,reducedfentanyl-inducedcough morethanlidocaineusedforthispurpose.

The fentanyl-induced cough reflex occurs frequently followinganestheticinduction.Luietal.10administered fen-tanylat thedose weused(5␮g/kg) viaperipheral venous route and observed cough in 43% of the patients. Yeh et al.4 observed fentanyl-induced cough due toinjection offentanyl1.5␮g/kgin21.6%oftheirpatients.Linetal.7 administeredfentanyl2.5␮g/kgwithin2sandfoundahigh coughrateof65%.Adouble-blindstudyreportedthatwitha higherdoseoffentanyl(4␮g/kg),coughwasseenin74.4%of thepatients.5Thedifferencesintheprevalenceofcoughin thesestudiesmaydependupontheinjectionsiteandroute offentanyl,speedofinjection,anddoseandconcentration ofthedrug.Alsogeneticfactorsandco-morbiditiesmayplay arole.

Particularly in open cardiac operations, to maintain stable hemodynamic parameters by inhibiting the stress responseofhemodynamicstoverypainfulsternotomy, high-dose narcotic analgesics are used in the induction and maintenance of anesthesia.11 For this purpose, fentanyl (because it provides rapid onset, short duration, intense analgesia,reducedcardiovasculardepression,andlow his-taminerelease)isone ofthemost frequentlyusedopioid analgesics.12,13Forthesamepurpose,wealsoadministered fentanylindoseshigherthanroutinelyused.Wethinkthat therelativelylowerincidenceofcough foundinourstudy canbeduetotworeasons.First,weadministeredfentanyl within5sthatisalongerperioddiscussedtootherstudies. Second,ourpatientswererelativelyolderthanthepatients ofpreviousstudies.5,7Asthepatientsgetolder,coughreflex is diminisheddue tolower irritatingreceptor activity.7 In a study on children aged4---10 years,a bolus of fentanyl 3␮g/kgviaperipheralvenousroutecausedcoughreflexin 43.5%ofthe children.14 In Linetal.’sstudy,7 theaverage ageofthecontrolswas36.8years.

There are various theories onfentanyl-induced cough. Fentanylinhibitscentralsympatheticoutflow,causesvagal predominance, and leads to cough and bronchoconstric-tion, and bronchospasm.4---6,15 Opioids may induce cough throughvariousmechanismsincludingthroughapulmonary chemoreflex, direct stimulation of the vagal nucleus, the releaseofneuropeptidesafteractivationof␮-opioid recep-tors and stimulation of the irritant receptors in upper pulmonarymucosa.16---19 Yehetal.4 reportedthatfentanyl can cause cough by stimulating the irritant receptors in

tracheal smooth muscle. Opioids release histamine from mast cells to a variable degree, with codeine, morphine and meperidine having the greatest histamine-releasing capacity,whiletramadol,fentanylandremifentanyldonot releasehistamineandarerecommendedinpulmonary dis-easerequiring opioidadministration.20 Ontheother hand, Kameietal.8intheirstudyonmicereportedthatfentanyl causescoughbyincreasingthequantityofcitricacidwhich inducescoughandbysignificantlyincreasingthe concentra-tionofhistamineinbronchoalveolarlavagefluid.

To inhibit the cough reflex, various medicaments are used (ephedrine, beclomethasone, B2-receptor agonist, ketamine,clonidine,propofol).Allthesemedicationshave bronchorelaxanteffectontheairwaysmoothmuscle.4,5,7,21 Lidocaine,oneof themost frequentlyusedmedicaments, has been shown to reduce airway reactiveness, possibly viamechanicallyandchemicallyinducedairwayreflexes.15 Pandeyetal.6intheirdouble-blindstudyreportedthat lido-caineadministeredoneminutebeforefentanylcouldinhibit fentanyl-inducedcough.

As known, histamine shows its effects on target tis-suessuchasairwaysmoothmuscle,bronchial epithelium, secretary glands, mast cells and epithelial cells through prominently H1, as well as H2 and H4 receptors. Pheni-ramine, an H1-receptor antagonist, affects by competing with histamineon H1-receptors. H1-receptor antagonists, in addition to their anti-allergic blockade on the H1-receptors, preventthe releaseof inflammatory mediators from basophils and mast cells. They also inhibit the migrationofeosinophils,basophils and/orneutrophils.22,23 Thereforewethoughtthatpheniraminemaybemore effec-tivethanlidocainetoalleviatethefentanyl-inducedcough. In our study, we also showed that lidocaine had an importanteffectonthefrequencyandseverityof fentanyl-induced cough. Additionally,we found thatpre-treatment with iv 45.5mg pheniramine maleate suppressed the fentanyl-inducedcoughduringgeneralanesthesiainduction, butmoreclinicaltrialsareneededtoevaluateitseffect.In ouranesthesiaclinic,theuseofpheniramineisnotroutine. Becauseanotherindicationofpheniramineisitsanti-allergic effectsduetobloodproductsinpatientsunderwenttoopen cardiacsurgery,weincludedonlythesepatientsinourstudy.

Conclusion

Intravenouspheniramineisaseffectiveaslidocainein pre-ventingfentayl-inducedcough.Ourresultsemphasizethat pheniramineisaconvenientdrugtodecreasethiscough.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

References

1.Pandey CK, Raza M, Ranjan R, et al. Intravenous lidocaine 0.5mgkg−1effectivelysuppressesfentanyl-inducedcough.Can JAnaesth.2005;52:172---5.

(5)

3.Elcock DH. Fentanyl-induced cough. Anaesthesia. 2010;65: 536---7.

4.YehCC,WuCT,HuhBK,etal.Premedicationwithintravenous low-doseketaminesuppressesfentanyl-inducedcough.JClin Anesth.2007;19:53---6.

5.SedighinejadA, NaderiNabiB,HaghighiM,et al.Propofolis effectivetodepressfentanyl-inducedcough duringinduction ofanesthesia.AnesthPainMed.2013;2:170---3.

6.Pandey CK, Raza M, Ranjan R, et al. Intravenous lidocaine suppressesfentanyl-inducedcoughing:adouble-blind, prospec-tive, randomized placebo-controlled study. Anesth Analg. 2004;99:1696---8,tableofcontents.

7.LinCS,SunWZ,ChanWH,etal.Intravenouslidocaineephedrine but not propofol suppress fentanyl-induced cough. Can J Anaesth.2004;51:654---9.

8.KameiJ,NakanishiY, AsatoM,et al.Fentanyl enhancesthe excitabilityof rapidlyadaptingreceptorsto causecough via theenhancementofhistaminereleaseintheairways.Cough. 2013;9:3.

9.Yu H, Yang XY, Zhang X, et al. The effect of dilution and prolongedinjectiontimeonfentanyl-inducedcoughing. Anaes-thesia.2007;62:919---22.

10.LuiPW,HsingCH, Chu YC.Terbutaline inhalationsuppresses fentanyl-inducedcoughing.CanJAnaesth.1996;43:1216---9. 11.StanleyTH,WebsterLR.Anestheticrequirementsand

cardio-vascular effects of fentanyl-oxygen and fentanyl-diazepam-oxygenanesthesiainman.AnesthAnalg.1978;57:411---6. 12.BovillJG,SebelPS,StanleyTH.Opioidanalgesicsinanesthesia:

withspecialreferencetotheiruseincardiovascularanesthesia. Anesthesiology.1984;61:731---55.

13.GrellFL,KoonsRA,DensonJS.Fentanylinanesthesia:areport of500cases.AnesthAnalg.1970;49:523---32.

14.Gecaj-GashiA,Nikolova-TodorovaZ,Ismaili-JahaV,etal. Intra-venouslidocainesuppressesfentanyl-inducedcoughinchildren. Cough.2013;9:20.

15.Generali JA, Cada DJ. Lidocaine:cough (fentanyl induced). HospPharm.2014;49:23---5.

16.ReitanJA,StengertKB,WymoreML,etal.Centralvagalcontrol offentanyl-inducedbradycardiaduringhalothaneanesthesia. AnesthAnalg.1978;57:31---6.

17.PaintalAS.MechanismofstimulationoftypeJpulmonary recep-tors.JPhysiol.1969;203:511---32.

18.Lou YP. Regulation of neuropeptide release from pulmonary capsaicin-sensitiveafferentsinrelationtobronchoconstriction. ActaPhysiolScandSuppl.1993;612:1---88.

19.Yasuda I, Hirano T, Yusa T, et al. Tracheal constriction by morphine and by fentanyl in man. Anesthesiology. 1978;49: 117---9.

20.ParmarMS.Exacerbationofasthmasecondarytofentanyl trans-dermalpatch.BMJCaseRep.2009;2009.

21.AgarwalA,AzimA,AmbeshS,etal.Salbutamol, beclometha-soneorsodiumchromoglycatesuppresscoughinginducedbyiv fentanyl.CanJAnaesth.2003;50:297---300.

22.Cook EB, Stahl JL, Barney NP, et al. Mechanisms of antihistamines and mast cell stabilizers in ocular allergic inflammation. Curr Drug Targets Inflamm Allergy. 2002;1: 167---80.

Imagem

Table 2 The comparison of cough characteristics in three groups.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

This study showed that in HIV-infected group and HIV-infected drug use group, the number of alleles whose frequency changed significantly was significantly higher than that in drug

Also both groups had signifi cant drops in post induction heart rate ((P &lt; 0.02 in sample group and P &lt; 0.001 in control group), and 35% of patients in the control group had

Compared with group 3, expressions of GSH and ␥ -GCS mRNA in group 4 were significantly increased at one, seven, and 14 days of exposure (p &lt; 0.05), but expressions of GSH showed

Results: The expression of AdipoR2, p38MAPK, LPL gene and protein in the liver of VitD in- tervention group was significantly higher than that in T2DM group (P &lt;0.05), while the TG

Cell viabilities of groups B, C, D, and E were significantly lower than that of group A (P&lt;0.05), indicating that hypoxia and HR can reduce cell viability of

Post-hoc anal- yses showed statistically significant differences (P &lt; 0.05) between the metatarsalgia types in relation to the matched healthy control group, such that

cast post-core group (control) and in the group with prefabricated post and no remaining coronal structure (group 2) demanded significantly higher force than that necessary to

The relaxation induced by acetylcholine was significantly lower in the group perfused with a 15 mM glucose solution compared with that in the control group (P &lt; 0.05), and a