ContentslistsavailableatSciVerseScienceDirect
Acta
Tropica
j ou rn a l h o m e pa g e: w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e/ a c t a t r o p i c a
Real-time
PCR
strategy
for
parasite
quantification
in
blood
and
tissue
samples
of
experimental
Trypanosoma
cruzi
infection
Sérgio
Caldas
c,d,
Ivo
Santana
Caldas
c,
Lívia
de
Figueiredo
Diniz
c,
Wanderson
Geraldo
de
Lima
a,c,
Riva
de
Paula
Oliveira
b,c,
Alzira
Batista
Cecílio
d,
Isabela
Ribeiro
e,
André
Talvani
a,c,
Maria
Terezinha
Bahia
a,c,∗aDepartamentodeCiênciasBiológicas,UniversidadeFederaldeOuroPreto,Campusuniversitário,MorrodoCruzeiro,OuroPreto,MinasGerais,Brazil
bDepartamentodeEvoluc¸ão,BiodiversidadeeMeioAmbiente,UniversidadeFederaldeOuroPreto,Campusuniversitário,MorrodoCruzeiro,OuroPreto,MinasGerais,Brazil cNúcleodePesquisasemCiênciasBiológicas,UniversidadeFederaldeOuroPreto,Campusuniversitário,MorrodoCruzeiro,OuroPreto,MinasGerais,Brazil
dFundac¸ãoEzequielDias,RuaCondePereiraCarneiro,80,Gameleira,BeloHorizonte,MinasGerais,Brazil eDrugsforNeglectedDiseaseInitiative,1202Geneve,Switzerland
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory:Received28July2011
Receivedinrevisedform30April2012 Accepted8May2012
Available online 18 May 2012 Keywords: Trypanosomacruzi Real-timePCR Experimentalmodel Inflammation Chemotherapy
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Thelackofanaccuratediagnosishasbeenaseriousobstacletotheadvancementoftheanti-Trypanosoma cruzichemotherapyandlong-terminfectioncanresultindifferenthealthriskstohuman.PCRsare alter-nativemethods,moresensitivethanconventionalparasitologicaltechniques,whichduetotheirlow sensitivitiesareconsideredunsuitableforthesepurposes.Theaimofthisstudywastoinvestigatea sensitivediagnosticstrategytoquantifybloodandcardiactissuesparasitesbasedonreal-timePCRtools duringacuteandchronicphasesofmurineChagasdisease,aswellastomonitortheevolutionof infec-tioninthosemiceunderspecifictreatment.Inparallel,freshbloodexamination,immunologicalanalysis andquantificationofcardiacinflammationwerealsoperformedtoconfrontandimprovereal-timePCR data.Similarprofilesofparasitemiacurveswereobservedinbothquantificationtechniquesduringthe acutephaseoftheinfection.Incontrast,parasitescouldbequantifiedonlybyreal-timePCRat60and 120daysofinfection.Incardiactissue,real-timePCRdetectedT.cruziDNAin100%ofinfectedmice, andusingthistoolasignificantPearsoncorrelationbetweenparasiteloadinperipheralbloodandin cardiactissueduringacuteandchronicphaseswasobserved.LevelsofserumCCL2,CCL5andnitricoxide werecoincidentwithparasiteloadbutfocalanddiffusemononuclearinfiltrateswasobserved,evenwith significant(p<0.05)reductionofparasitismafter60daysofinfection.Later,thismethodologywasused tomonitortheevolutionofinfectioninanimalstreatedwithitraconazole(Itz).Itz-treatmentinduceda reductionofparasiteloadinbothbloodandcardiacmuscleatthetreatmentperiod,butaftertheendof chemotherapyanincreaseofparasitismwasdetected.Interestingly,inflammatorymediatorslevelsand heartinflammationintensityhadsimilarevolutiontotheparasiteload,inthegroupofanimalstreated. Takentogether,ourdatashowthatreal-timePCRstrategyusedwassuitableforstudiesofmurineT.cruzi infectionandmayproveusefulininvestigationsinvolvingexperimentalchemotherapyofthedisease andthebenefitsoftreatmentinrelationtoparasitismandinflammatoryresponse.
© 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
TheAmericantrypanosomiasisorChagasdisease,discoveredin
1909byCarlosJustinianoRibeirodasChagas,isazoonosiscaused
Abbreviations: TNF-␣,tumornecrosisfactor-alpha;CCL5,regulatedupon acti-vation,normalTcellexpressedandsecreted;CCL2,monocytechemoattractant protein-1;NO,nitricoxide;FBE,freshbloodexamination;d.i.,daysofinfection; Itz,itraconazole.
∗ Correspondingauthorat:Laboratóriodedoenc¸adeChagas,DECBI/NUPEB, Uni-versidadeFederaldeOuroPreto,ICEB,CampusMorrodoCruzeiro,35400-000Ouro Preto,MG,Brazil.Tel.:+553135591690;fax:+553135591680.
E-mailaddress:mtbahia@nupeb.ufop.br(M.T.Bahia).
bytheprotozoanTrypanosomacruzi(Chagas,1909).Thiszoonosis
istypicalofLatinAmericaextendingtothesoutheasternofthe
UnitedStatesofAmerica.Significantadvanceshavetakenplacein
thecontrolofvectorialandtransfusionaltransmissionofthe
dis-easeinsomepartsoftheendemicarea,particularlybytheSouthern
Coneinitiative that ledtointerruption ofvector-to-human and
human-to-human propagationof the disease in Uruguay,Chile
andBrazilinrecentyears(Diasetal.,2002;Schofieldetal.,2006).
However,duetomigrationalmovementsofpeoplefromendemic
countries, Chagas disease has been reported in non-endemic
areaswhere thecongenitaltransmission,blood transfusionand
organ transplantplays an important role (Gascon et al., 2007).
Therefore,therearestillmanychallengestoachievefullcontrol
0001-706X/$–seefrontmatter © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.05.002
oreliminationofthedisease,mainlyduetotheunevenprogress
ofthevectorial/transfusional controlprogramsinotherpartsof
thecontinent,limitations ofdiagnosticmethods andsignificant
limitationsofcurrentchemotherapyavailable(Urbina,2010).
Chagasdiseasebegins withan acutephase characterizedby
thepresenceofparasitesinthebloodstreamanddifferenttissues
oftheinfectedindividual.Nonspecificsymptomsandmyocarditis
arecommonfeaturesduringtheearlystageoftheinfection(Dias,
1992).InfiltrationofTcellsandmacrophagesintothehearttissue
duringtheacutephaseoftheinfectionisessentialforcontrolling
theparasitereplication(Hardisonetal.,2006).Additionally,cardiac
parasitismwasapparentlyrelatedtotheincreasedexpressionof
cytokinesandchemokines(Villaltaetal.,1998;Talvanietal.,2000),
inwhichthechemokinescorrelatedintheuptakeandkillingofthe
intracellularparasitesbyinducingNOsynthaseactivation
enhanc-ingNOproductionbymacrophagesandcardiomyocytes(Villalta
etal.,1998;Teixeiraetal.,2002;TalvaniandTeixeira,2011).
Molecularassayshavebeenwidelyusedforthediagnosisand
monitoringofdiseaseprogressionandtherapyoutcomein
Cha-gasdisease(Moseretal.,1989;Junqueiraetal.,1996;Kirchhoff
etal.,1996;Marconetal.,2002).PCRsarealternativemethods,
moresensitivethanconventionalparasitologicaltechniques,such
ashemoculture, whichduetotheirlowsensitivitiesare
consid-eredunsuitable for these purposes (WHO, 2002). For instance,
nested-PCR(N-PCR)hasdemonstratedgreatersensitivitythan
con-ventionalPCRandithasbeendescribedasanextremelysensitive
methodforthediagnosisofChagasdisease(Marconetal.,2002).
However,thedisadvantageofthistechniqueisthetimerequired
fortheirachievementandthegreatriskoffalsepositivesresults
causedbycontaminatingamplicons(Pironetal.,2007).
In contrast, real-time PCR uses fluorescent dyes or probes
allowingthe continuousmonitoring of the reactionduring the
amplificationprocess, insteadof theamountoftarget
accumu-latedafterafixednumberofcycles.Thiscompletelyrevolutionizes
thewaytoapproach the quantificationof DNA and RNA.Once
thenucleicacidamplificationanddetectionstepsareperformed
inone tube,theriskof releasingamplifiednucleicacidstothe
environmentandcontaminationofsubsequentassaysisverylow
compared to therisk conferred by conventional PCR or N-PCR
(Cockerill,2003;BankowskiandAnderson,2004).Thus,the
com-binationofexcellentsensitivityandspecificity,lowcontamination
riskandgreaterspeedofworkhasmadethetechnologyof
real-timePCRahighlyapplicabletool,usefulformanypurposes,such
aslaboratorydiagnostics,geneexpressionanalysis,quantification
ofparasitesandmanyotherapplicationsinthefieldofresearch
(Duffyetal.,2009;deFreitasetal.,2011).Theaimofthisstudy
wastostandardizeanaccuratereal-timePCRstrategyfor
detec-tionandquantificationofT.cruziDNAinthebloodandheartof
infectedmiceduringtheacutephaseandchronicdisease
transi-tion,assessingthecorrelationbetweenbloodandtissueparasitism,
inflammatorymediatorsCCL2,CCL5,nitricoxideandthe
applica-bilityofthisapproachtomonitorthecourseofinfectionduringthe
treatmentofmice.
2. Materialsandmethods
2.1. Parasiteandinfection
TheVL-10strainofT.cruzi,DTUII(Morenoetal.,2010)whichis
resistanttobenznidazoletreatment(FilardiandBrener,1987)has
beenmaintainedcryopreservedinliquidnitrogenatLaboratoryof
Chagasdisease,UniversidadeFederaldeOuroPreto(UFOP),Brazil.
ThirtyfemaleSwissmice(age,3–4weeks;weight,18–22g)were
inoculatedingroupswith5× 103bloodstreamformsofT.cruziby
intraperitonealrouteinatotaloftwoindependentexperiments.
All procedures and experimental protocols were conducted in
accordance withtheCOBEA (Brazilian Schoolof Animal
Exper-imentation) guidelines for the use of animals in research and
approvedbytheEthics CommitteeinAnimalResearch atUFOP
(number2009/17).
2.2. Bloodandtissueparasitequantification
Blood parasitequantification wereperformed at 10, 12, 14,
16,20, 30, 40,50, 60,and 120daysafterinfection(d.i.) (n=6).
Twomethodswere usedfor measurementof blood parasitism:
(i)microscopicfreshbloodexamination(FBE):5Lofbloodwere
collectedfromthemouse’stailandthenumberofparasiteswas
estimatedasdescribedbyBrener(1962).(ii)Real-timePCR:200L
ofbloodwascollectedfromorbitalvenoussinusofanimalsand
mixedto35Lof129mMsodiumcitratesolution(DOLES,BR).The
collectedmaterialwassubjectedtoDNAextraction.Theextracted
DNAwasfrozenat−20◦Cuntilrequired.Inbothmethods(i)and
(ii),curveswereplottedusingparasitemiaaverageofsixmice.
Thecurvesofcardiacparasitismweregeneratedbyreal-time
PCR.Wecollected30mgofhearttissueofanimalsat10,16,30,60
and120d.i(n=6).Thismaterialwasstoredat−70◦CuntilDNA
extraction. Theextracted DNAwasfrozenat −20◦Cfor later T.
cruziquantificationbyreal-timePCR.Curveswereplottedusing
parasitismaverageofsixmice.
2.3. Treatmentschedule
Groups of 24 miceinoculated intraperitoneally with5×103
trypomastigotes were treated with Itraconazole (Itz):
4-[4-[4- [4-[[2-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-ylmethyl)-
1,3-dioxolan-4-yl]methoxy]phenyl]-1-piperazinyl]phenyl]-2,4-dihydro-2-(1-methylpropyl)-3H-1,2,4-Triazol-3-one. Treatments
werestartedonthe10thdayafterinfectionandwereadministered
bygavagefor20consecutivedays.Itzweresuspendedinwater
with4%methylcellulose(Sigma)andwereadministeredindosesof
100mg/kgbodyweight.Thistreatmentprotocolwasstandardized
previouslybyToledoetal.(2003).
2.4. DNApreparationandreal-timePCR
TheextractionoftotalgenomicDNAfrombloodandtissueof
animalsinfectedwithT.cruziwasperformedusingthe
commer-cialkit (Wizard® GenomicDNA Purification Kit,Promega) with
modificationsforDNAextractionfromcardiactissueofmouse.The
modificationconsistedintheincubationof30mgofsampleat55◦C
for2hwith120Lof0.5MEDTAsolution(pH8.0)(Sigma®),500L
ofnucleiclysissolution(Promega)and9LofproteinaseK(fungal)
(InvitrogenTM)at20mg/mLfollowedbymacerationandtreatment
according tothemanufacturer’s specifications for extractionof
tissueDNA.DNAwasquantifiedbyspectrophotometer
(Pharma-ciaBiotechGenequant)andtheconcentrationswereadjustedto
25ng/L.
ThePCRreactionwereperformedin10Lcontaining50ngof
genomicDNA,5LofSYBR®GreenPCRMastermix(Applied
Biosys-tems)andeither0.35MforT.cruzi195basepairs(bp)repeat
DNA-specificprimersor0.50Mofmurine-specifictumor
necro-sisfactor-␣ (TNF-␣)primers. Theprimersfor T.cruzi repetitive
DNA (TCZ-F5-GCTCTTGCCCACAMGGGTGC-3,where M=Aor C
andTCZR5-CCAAGCAGCGGATAGTTCAGG-3)amplifya182-bpas
describedbyCummingsandTarleton(2003).Primersformurine
TNF-␣ (TNF-52415-TCCCTCTCATCAGTTCTATGGCCCA-3and
TNF-54115-CAGCAAGCATCTATGCACTTAGACCCC-3)amplifya170-bp
product(CummingsandTarleton,2003).Thecyclingprogram
con-sistedofaninitialdenaturationat95◦Cfor10min,followedby
acquisitionat64.3◦C.Amplificationwasimmediatelyfollowedby
ameltprogramwithaninitialdenaturationof15sat95◦C,
cool-ingto60◦Cfor1minandthenastepwisetemperatureincreaseof
0.3◦C/sfrom60to95◦C.
Each96-wellreactionplatecontainedstandardcurveandtwo
negativecontrols.Negativecontrolsconsistedofareactionwith
T.cruzi-specificormurine-specificprimerswithoutDNAandalso
withbloodortissueDNAfromnon-infectedmice.EachDNAsample
wasquantifiedinduplicate.ThemeanquantificationvaluesforT.
cruziDNAwerenormalizedbythedataobtainedwiththe
murine-specific(TNF-␣) primersasfollows:normalized value=(meanT.
cruziDNA/meanTNF-␣DNA)×1000,where“1000”correspondsto
theexpectedvalueforTNF-␣from200Lofbloodor30mgofheart
tissue.Theefficienciesofamplificationweredetermined
automat-icallybytheStepOneTM Softwarev2.0bycalculating:efficiency
(E)=10(−1/slope)(Stordeuretal.,2002).
2.5. T.cruzistandardcalibrationcurve
Standard curvesweregenerated fromfiveserial dilutionsin
water(1:10)ofDNAextractedfrombloodandtissuestandards
con-taining5× 106parasites/0.1mLofbloodand106parasites/30mg
ofhearttissue, respectively.Thelimitsofdetectionof parasites
wereverifiedby6serialdilutions(1:10)of100parasiteequiv.(from
bloodandcardiactissuestandards)inDNA(25ng/L)fromblood
andhearttissueofhealthymice.Theterms“bloodstandard”and
“tissuestandard”refertoDNAextractedfromoptimizedvolumes
ofbloodsamplesandmassofhearttissuespecimensfromhealthy
micespikedwithaknownquantityofepimastigotes(VL-10strain).
Thestandardsweregeneratedinsufficientquantitiesforall
real-timePCRassays.
2.6. Histopathologyandmorphometricanalysis
Forhistopathologicalanalysis,experimentalmicewere
sacri-ficedondays10,30and120(6animals/group/day).Hearttissues
werefixedin10%formalinandembeddedinparaffin.Blockswere
cut into 4m sections and stained by Hematoxylin and Eosin
(H&E)forinflammationassessment.Twentyfieldsfromeachslide
wererandomlychosenat40×magnificationperformingatotalof
1.49×106m2analyzedmyocardiumarea.Imageswereobtained
throughaLeicaDM5000Bmicrocamera(LeicaApplicationSuite,
model2.4.0R1)andprocessedbythesoftwareLeicaQwinV3image
analyzer.Theinflammatoryprocesswasevaluatedbythe
correla-tionindexbetweenthenumberofcellsobservedinmyocardium
musclefromnon-infectedandinfectedanimals(Caldasetal.,2008).
2.7. Immunoassays
Immunoassayswereperformedusingplasmafromall
exper-imental animalsto detectmonocyte chemoattractant protein-1
(MCP-1/CCL2) and Regulated upon Activation, normal T-cell
expressedand secreted (RANTES/CCL5). Briefly, flat-bottom
96-well microtiter plates (Nunc) were coated with 100L/well of
the CCL2 and CCL5 specific chemokine monoclonal antibodies
(0.2g/mLand2.0g/mL,respectively)for18hat4◦Candthen
washedwithPBSbuffer(pH7.4)containing0.05%Tween20(wash
buffer).Nonspecificbindingsiteswereblockedwith300L/wellof
1%BSAinPBS.Plateswererinsedwithwashbuffer,and50L/well
ofsamples andstandards addedfollowed byincubation for2h
atroomtemperature. Sevenpoint standardcurves using 2-fold
serial dilutions with 1% BSA in PBS, and high CCL2 and CCL5
standardsof250pg/mLand2000pg/mLwereused,respectively.
Plateswerethenwashedand100L/welloftheappropriateCCL2
(50ng/mL)andCCL5(400ng/mL)biotinylateddetection
antibod-iesdiluted in blocking buffercontaining0.05% Tween 20 were
added for 1hat room temperature. Plateswere, then, washed
andstreptavidin–horseradishperoxidase(0.1g/mL)wasadded
for30minofincubationatroomtemperature.Finally,plateswere
washedand100L/wellofthesubstratesolution–1:1mixture
ofcolorreagentA(H2O2)andcolorreagentB
(Tetramethylbenzi-dine)–wasaddedandafter30minofadarkincubationatroom
temperature,thereactionwasstoppedby50L/wellof1MH2SO4
solution.Plateswerereadat450nmwithwavelengthcorrection
at570nminaspectrophotometer(MicroplateReader,model680,
BioRad).AllsampleswereassayedinduplicateusingDuoSet®ELISA
DevelopmentSystem,RandDSystems®,Minneapolis,MNsystems.
2.8. Nitricoxidedetection
Nitritelevelsintheplasmaofmiceweredeterminedusingthe
GriessreactionasanindexofNOproduction(Vespaetal.,1994).
Briefly,50Lofplasmafromeachanimalwasdilutedwith50L
ofwaterandtreatedwith15LofamixofNADPH,FADandnitrate
reductase(atconcentrationsof1U/mL–Sigma®).About18hafter
incubationat37◦C,samplesweredeproteinatedwith10Lofzinc
sulfate(300g/L–Sigma®)andcentrifugedat2000×gfor5min.
50Lofsupernatantsampleswascombinedinaflat-bottom
96-wellmicrotiterplates(Nunc)witha1:1mixtureof1%sulfanilamide
in 2.5%H3PO4 and 0.1%naphtylethylenediamidein 2.5%H3PO4
(Sigma®).Plateswereincubatedfor10minatroomtemperature,
andtheabsorbancewasmeasuredat550nmusingtheautomated
MicroplateReader,model680,BioRad.Nitriteconcentrationswere
determinedbyusingastandardcurveofsodiumnitritefrom125
to1M.
2.9. Statisticalanalysis
Datawereexpressedasmean±standarddeviation.Statistical
differenceforparasitologicaldataamongvariousgroupsofmice
atdifferentdaysaswellascytokinelevelsandintensityof
inflam-mationweredeterminedbythenonparametricTukey’sMultiple
ComparisonTest.Mann–Whitneytestwasusedwhentwogroups
ofanimalswereanalyzed.Pearson’scorrelation(r)wasalsoused
toevaluatetheassociationofparasitisminbloodandhearttissues.
Valuesofp<0.05wereconsideredsignificant.
3. Results
3.1. Standardcurvesandsensitivityofreal-timePCRassay
Theprimarygoalofthis studywastostandardizeastrategy
basedonreal-timePCRforasensitiveandreproducible
quantifi-cationofparasiteloadinperipheralbloodandhearttissueduring
acuteandchronicexperimentalChagasdiseaseinmice,aswell
asitsapplicationinthemonitoringofexperimental
chemother-apy.Thetissueandbloodstandardscurvesweregeneratedfrom
fiveserialdilutionsofDNAfrom106parasites/30mgofheart
tis-sueand5×106parasites/0.1mLofbloodforthequantificationof
T.cruzi(basedonourpreviousexperiencewithFBEshowing
maxi-mumparasitemiasaround3–4millionparasitesper0.1mLblood).
TheTNF-␣DNAwasassignedasanarbitraryvalueof103inboth
bloodandtissuestandards.Fig.1AshowsamplificationcurvesofT.
cruziandTNF-␣DNAinfourlogdilutions.Fig.1Bshowsthe
stan-dardcurvesgeneratedfromthelinearregionofeachamplification
curve.Theefficiency(E)andrvaluesforthehearttissuesamples
weresimilar.Fig.1C illustratestypicalmelting curvesobserved
afteramplificationofT.cruziandinternalcontrol.Thetemperature
ofmelting(Tm)observedfortheparasitewas∼81◦Candforthe
internalcontrolwas∼79.3◦CineitherDNAextractedfromblood
Fig.1.StandardcurvegeneratedwithDNAextractedfrombloodofhealthymicespikedwithTrypanosomacruziepimastigotes(VL-10strain).TheblacklinesrefertoT.cruzi DNAandthegraylinestoTNF-␣DNA(referencegene).(A)CurvesweregeneratedwithT.cruziandTNF-␣primersfromfiveserialdilutionsinwater(1:10)ofDNAextracted frombloodstandardscontaining5× 106parasites/0.1mLofblood.(B)Standardcurvesweregeneratedfromthelinearregionofeachamplificationcurve.Efficiencyof
amplificationforeachprimersetwasdeterminedusingtheequation:efficiency(E)=10(−1/slope),beingT.cruziE=93.989%andR2=0.997andTNF-␣E=93.07%andR2=0.993.
(C)TypicalmeltingcurvesweregeneratedafteramplificationofT.cruziandTNF-˛DNAshowingpeaksaround81◦Cand79.3◦C,respectively.
Fig.2. LimitsofdetectionforbothTrypanosomacruziDNAfromblood(graysquares) andhearttissues(blacksquares)ofmice.Thelimitofdetectionwas0.1parasite equiv./50ngofDNAinbothtissues(bloodandheart).
Fig.2showsthesensitivityofreal-timePCRtodetectT.cruziDNA
frombloodandhearttissueofmice.Thelimitsofdetectionwere
0.1parasiteequiv./50ngDNA.Table1representsthe
reproducibil-ityoftwoindependenttestsofreal-timePCRwiththebloodand
hearttissuesfromsixmice.TheresultsofthePCRreproducibility
wereexpressedinparasiteequiv./50ngDNAfrom0.1mLofblood
and30mgofhearttissue.
Table1
Reproducibilityofquantifiedproductfromtwoindependentreal-timePCRtests performedwiththebloodandhearttissuesfromsixmice.
Parasiteequiv./50ngDNA
Bloodsample Run1 Run2 Mean (S.D.) 1 0.128 0.120 0.124 (0.01) 2 0.520 0.530 0.525 (0.01) 3 0.818 0.825 0.821 (0.01) 4 10.012 9.879 9.946 (0.09) 5 5.082 5.567 5.324 (0.34) 6 3.965 4.081 4.023 (0.08) Cardiacmusclesample
1 2.673 2.975 2.824 (0.21) 2 2.272 2.388 2.330 (0.08) 3 1.616 1.651 1.634 (0.02) 4 3.962 4.050 4.006 (0.06) 5 0.927 0.775 0.851 (0.11) 6 3.130 3.057 3.093 (0.05)
3.2. QuantitativeanalysisofT.cruziloadinbloodandcardiac
tissues
Next,weassessedtheparasiteloadduringtheacuteandchronic
disease transition by real-time PCR and FBE. The parasitemia
profiles curves weresimilar for both quantification techniques
during the acute phase of the infection. In contrast, parasites
couldbe quantifiedonly by real-time PCR at a ratioof 159.38
and 174.63parasites/0.1mLofblood at60 and 120d.i.,
respec-tively(Fig.3).Inaddition,real-timePCRdetectedparasiteDNAin
bloodandcardiactissuesin100%ofinfectedmiceinevery
analy-sisperformed,whileFBEshowedlowandintermittentparasitemia
quantificationat40(16.6%)and50(33%)d.i.andnegativeresults
at60and120d.i.asshowedinFig.4.
Inthenext,correlationsbetweenbloodandcardiactissues
par-asiteburdenwasevaluatedbyreal-timePCRondays10,16,30,60
and120afterinfection.Duringtheacutephaseofinfection
para-siteswereeasilydetectedinboth,bloodandcardiactissues,being
theirburdensignificantlylarger(p<0.05)inbloodsamplethanin
cardiactissue (Fig.5).Interestingly, after60 d.i.parasites were
moreeasilydetectedincardiac tissuethan inperipheralblood.
Fig.3.Averagenumberofparasitesdetectedbyreal-timePCR(blackcolumns)and freshbloodexamination-FBE(whitecolumns)onpredetermineddaysafter infec-tioningroupsofsixmiceinfectedwiththeVL-10strainofT.cruzi.Datashowthe averagesoftwoindependentexperiments.Asteriskdenotesasignificantdifference, asdeterminedbytheMann–Whitneytest(p<0.05).
Fig.4. Percentageofpositiveresultsbyfreshbloodexamination(FBE)andreal-time PCRinblood(PCR–blood)andhearttissues(PCR–heart)ofmiceinfectedwith 5×103trypomastigotesofT.cruzi(VL-10strain)atdifferentdaysafterinfection.
Thedatarepresenttheaverageoftwoindependentexperiments.
Consideringtheresultsofreal-timePCR,theaveragenumberof
par-asitesdetectedinthehearttissueat60and120d.i.were2608.83
and925.31parasites/30mgofcardiactissueandintheperipheral
bloodwere159.38and174.63parasites/0.1mLofblood,
respec-tively.TherewasasignificantPearsoncorrelationbetweenparasite
loadpresentintheperipheralbloodandinthecardiactissue
dur-ingacuteandchronicphasesofdisease(p<0.001andrvalueof
0.8068).
Later, in the group of treated animals (Fig. 6), at 30 d.i.
(end of chemotherapeutic schedule), the PCR performed with
DNA extracted from heart (PCR-H) detected an average of
416.69parasites/30mgofhearttissueandthePCRperformedwith
DNAfromblood(PCR-B)foundanaverageof1.16parasites/0.1mL
ofblood.Afterthisperiod,thelevelsofparasitism(inbloodand
heart)increasedagain,beingequivalentat60and120d.i.by
real-timePCRdetection.The“+”signat120d.i.indicatesapositiveresult
byFBE,detectedafterexhaustiveanalysissincetheparasitecount
Fig.5. Bloodandhearttissueparasitismdetectedbyreal-timePCRinblood(PCR– blood)andhearttissues(PCR–heart)ofmiceinfectedwith5×103trypomastigotes
ofTrypanosomacruzi(strainVL-10)atdays10,16,30,60and120afterinfection.The datarepresenttheaverageoftwoindependentexperiments.Asteriskdenotesa sig-nificantdifference,asdeterminedbytheMann–Whitneytest(p<0.05).Theinsert representthecorrelationanalysisoftissueandbloodparasitism,beingPearson (r)=0.8068andp<0.001.
Fig.6.ParasitesdetectedbyFreshBloodExamination(FBE)andbyreal-timePCR inblood(PCR–blood)andincardiactissues(PCR–heart)ofmiceinoculatedwith 5×103trypomastigoteformsofTrypanosomacruzi(VL10strain)andtreatedwith
Itraconazole.Thetreatmentwasperformedondays10–30post-infection.Different symbolsindicatesignificantdifference(p<0.05).
bythemethodofBrener (1962)showednegativeresults.These
datashowedthattheVL-10strainofT.cruziwasfullyresistantto
Itz,sincealltreatedanimalsshowedparasitismupto90daysafter
treatment.
3.3. Immunologicalanalysisandquantificationofcardiac
inflammation
Correlatingwiththeincreasinginparasiteburden,serumlevels
ofCCL2(Fig.7A)andCCL5(Fig.7B)wereproportionallyelevated
duringtheearlyacutephase(10d.i.)oftheinfectionpeakingat30
d.i.withserumlevels∼6-fold(CCL2)and∼3-fold(CCL5)higher
compared tonon-infectedmice,except forthetreated animals,
whichshowedsimilarlevelstothosenon-infectedanimals.
How-ever,atthe90daysaftertreatment,thelevelsofthesechemokines
increasedandbecamesimilartothosenon-treatedinfected
ani-mals,whichwere3and2-foldlowers,respectively,thanthelevels
observedat30d.i.,butyethighercomparedtonon-infectedmice.
Levelsofnitricoxide(NO)werealsomeasuredinbothphasesof
infection,asshowedin Fig.7C. At30d.i. serumconcentrations
ofNO reached∼3.3-fold higherthanthose observedtohealthy
mice.Interestingly,whentheparasitismwascontrolled,therewas
adecreaseinNOlevelsreachingsimilarlevelstohealthyanimals
at120d.i.,aswellasthetreatedones,whichalwayshadNOlevels
similartothosenon-infectedmice.
Besides,attheendoftreatment(30d.i.),treatedinfected
ani-mals(Fig.8C)showedlessinflammatoryinfiltratethannon-treated
infectedcontrol(Fig.8D)butsignificantlyhigher(p<0.001)than
the healthy mice (Fig. 8B). Furthermore, the partial protection
observedafterthetreatmentwasnotmaintainedthroughoutthe
courseofinfection(Fig.8A)and,at120d.i.,weobservedhigh
cel-lularityininfectedanimals,regardlessoftheyhavebeentreatedor
nottreated.
4. Discussion
In research laboratories, PCR has been proposed to be an
alternativetoolforT.cruziquantificationsinceitismoresensitive
thanthetraditionalparasitologicaltechniques,suchasfreshblood
examination,xenodiagnosisandhemoculture(Moseretal.,1989;
Fig.7. CCL2(A),CCL5(B)andnitricoxide(C)detectedintheplasmaofmiceinfectedwithT.cruzi(I),non-infected(NI)andtreatedinfected(TI)at10,30and120daysof infection(d.i.).Differenceswereconsideredsignificantatp<0.05.
ThedisadvantageofconventionalPCR,however,istimeconsuming
andhighriskoffalsepositiveresultsduetocarry-over
contamina-tion(sincetheamplifiedproductisdetectedbygelelectrophoresis)
alongwiththeimpossibility ofperformingquantitativeanalysis
(Piron etal.,2007),oncethecalculationofamplifiedproductis
limitedtotheplateauphaseoftheamplificationreaction.
In this context, the quantitative real-time PCR is emerging
asanappropriatemoleculartoolformonitoringparasiteloadin
experimentalT.cruzi infections.Real-time PCRacquires dataat
eachcycleofthePCRreaction,allowingthecalculationof
prod-uctamountfromthelog-linearregionoftheamplificationcurve
(CummingsandTarleton,2003).Asatargetforamplification,
satel-liteT.cruziDNA(representedin104to105copiesintheparasite
genome)highlyconserved(Gonzalezetal.,1984;Moseretal.,1989;
Eliasetal.,2005)wasusedtoprovideaccurateandefficientPCR
based-measurements.PrimersetusedforT.cruziDNA(Cummings
andTarleton,2003)iscapableofamplifyingatandemlyrepeated
genomicsequenceof195basepairs(Gonzalezetal.,1984;Moser
etal.,1989).Theinternalcontrol(asinglecopyofthemouseTNF-␣
gene)wasusedtocorrectvariationsininitialsamplesamount,DNA
recovery,and samples loading(Cummings andTarleton, 2003).
Theoptimizationoftheabovementionedreal-timePCRstrategy
allowedarapid,reproducibleandsensitivequantificationofT.cruzi
directlyinbloodandhearttissuesofmice,aswellasmonitoringthe
courseofinfectioninanimalsunderspecifictreatment.The
proto-colwasfollowedbyconfirmationoftheamplificationspecificityby
analysisofmeltingcurves.
Inthiswork,PCRinhibitorswhichcaninterferewiththe
ampli-ficationcyclesandalter thereactionefficiencywereminimized
withtheuseofanoptimizedextractionprotocolfollowedby
dilu-tionoftheextractedDNAinordertoobtaintheconcentrationof
25ng/LofDNA.Theendpointofthecurve(100parasiteequiv.)
wasdilutedwith25ng/LofDNAtomakesurethatthehigh
sen-sitivityobservedin thetest wasnot favored bydilution ofthe
standardsinwater.Thus,itwasfoundthatdilutionofthestandards
inwaterorDNAdoesnotinterferewiththetestsensitivity.The
Fig.8.AnalysisofhistologicalsectionsofheartsfrommiceinfectedwithVL-10strainofTrypanosomacruzi.(A)CellularityofthemyocardialsectionsofmiceinfectedwithT. cruzi(I),non-infected(NI)andtreatedinfected(TI)at10,30and120daysofinfection(d.i.).SectionsofmyocardiumofNI(B),TI(C)andI(D)at30d.i.(H&E,40×magnification). Differenceswereconsideredsignificantforp<0.05.
standardcurvesgeneratedforquantificationofbloodandtissue
parasitesshowedamplificationefficienciesabove90%.
SincetheDNArecoveryfrombloodandtissuewassignificantly
variable,itwasimportanttohaveaninternalcontroltonormalize
theamountofsamplebeinganalyzedineachreal-timePCRassay
(CummingsandTarleton,2003).TheDNAofTNF-␣presentinthe
standardsample(generatedwith200Lofbloodor30mgofheart
tissue)wasassignedasanarbitraryvalueof103,sincewedonot
needtoknowtheabsolutevalueofTNF-␣,buttheexpectedvalue
in200Lofbloodor30mgofcardiactissuetotherebynormalize
thesampleloadingerrors.Theuseofareferencegeneallowedus
toobtainreproduciblequantificationofT.cruziinbloodandheart
samples.Wedemonstratedthereproducibilityoftheassayby
per-formingthequantificationofthesamegroupofbloodandheart
tissuessamplesintwoPCRtestsconductedatdifferenttimes.
ToverifywhetherthequantificationofT.cruziDNAwouldreflect
thenumberofliveparasitespresentinbloodsamples,their
quan-tificationwasalwaysperformedinparallelbyFBEandreal-time
PCR.Similarprofilesofparasitemiawereobservedinbothmethods
ofquantification;however,thereal-timePCRwasabletoquantify
parasitesat60and120d.i.whenparasitemiawaslow.
Further-more,theFBEdoneinparallelwithPCRdemonstratesnoinhibition
andnodrugsinterferenceinthePCRquantificationofparasitemia.
Thestandardizationofreal-timePCRusing200Lofblood
con-tributedtothehighersensitivityofthistechniquecomparedwith
theFBE,whichrequires5Lofblood(mainlybecauselarger
vol-umesofbloodaffecttheperceptionandparasitesquantificationby
theobserver).However,wecannotdisregardthehighefficiencyof
FBEformonitoringtheparasitemiaduringtheacutephaseof
infec-tionand/orwhentheparasitemiaishigh.Thegreatadvantageof
PCR,however,isitsapplicationinmonitoringofparasitesinboth
bloodandcardiactissueofmicewithhighsensitivity.Attheendof
treatment,onlythereal-timePCRwasabletodetectandquantify
parasitism,aswellasduringthechronicphaseofinfection.
Besides,therewasa positive correlationbetweenblood and
tissueparasitism(r=0.8068andp<0.001)detectedbyreal-time
PCR.Previously,ithasalsobeendescribedacorrelationamongthe
parasiteburden,theintensityofinflammatoryprocessesandthe
severityofthediseaseinbothhumansandexperimentalanimals
(Zhangand Tarleton,1999;Pérez-Fuentesetal.,2003;Schijman etal.,2004;Benvenutietal.,2008).Althoughparasiteisthemain
triggerofcardiaclesions,theimmune systemof thevertebrate
host exerts a decisive role in the development of lesions. The
effectiveimmunedefenseofthevertebratehostrequiresaflow
directedandprecisepositioningofeffectorscellstowardthe
infec-tionsite(Luster,2002).ChemokinessuchasCCL2andCCL5,have
beenobservedinhumanandmurinemacrophagesand
cardiomy-ocytesinfectedbyT.cruzi(Villaltaetal.,1998;Alibertietal.,1999;
Machadoetal.,2000).Severalauthorshavedescribedtheroleof
thesechemokinestoleukocyteattractionanditslikelyinvolvement
incontrollingthegrowthofT.cruziandNOproduction(Sallusto
et al.,1998; Villaltaetal., 1998; Alibertiet al.,1999; Machado etal.,2000;Coelhoetal.,2002;Talvanietal.,2009;Talvaniand Teixeira,2011).Probablythehighparasitismintheheartandblood
(mainlyobservedwithin30d.i.intheinfectednon-treated
ani-mals),exertedinfluenceintheincreasedexpressionofCCL2and
CCL5bymacrophagesandactivatedCD4+andCD8+ Tcells,
con-tributing to thedirected migration of leukocytes to the injury
site.AccordingtoPaivaetal.(2009),thechemokineCCL2is
pro-ducedin large quantitiesin the heart of miceinfected withT.
cruziandplaysanimportantroleinthedestructionofparasites
bymacrophages.Infectedcardiomyocytescoupledtotheinfluxof
monocytes/macrophagestotheinfectedhearttissue,probably
con-tributetotheincreasedproductionofchemokinesand NO.This
viewalsoexplainsthelackofstimulationoftheseinflammatory
moleculesintreatedanimalsat30d.i.sincetheparasitismwas
controlledbythedrugatthistime. Ontheotherhands,NO,as
describedbyseveralauthors(Saefteletal.,2001;Machadoetal.,
2008)exertstrypanocidalactivitybutalsocausedamagetoinfected
tissue,whichcanbeaggravatedbytheinfluxofCD8+Tcellsrichin
granulysinandperforin(Stegelmannetal.,2005),directedtothe
siteofinfectioninaCCL5-dependentmanner.However,inparallel
withthedevelopmentofthespecificimmuneresponse,parasitism
levelswerecontrolledandtherespectivestimulusforthe
expres-sionofchemokines,cytokinesandNO,partially,reduced.Probably
thisisonereasonbywhichanimalshavelowlevelsofCCL2,CCL5
and NOat 120d.i.,regardlessof whethertheywere treatedor
non-treated.Buttheprevalenceofcardiacinflammationat120d.i.
(inbothtreatedandnon-treatedmice)suggestsanimbalancein
theimmuneresponseoftheseanimals.Therefore,infectionwith
T.cruzishouldnotbelinkedinvariablytoadistinctparasiteload,
butafinebalancebetweenresponsesthat,althoughessentialfor
hostresistance,mayalsocontributetoimmunopathology(Roggero
etal.,2002).
Finally,theexperimentalmodelofT.cruziinfectionusedinthis
studyinassociationwithrealtimePCR,asaprimarytool,was
suit-ableshowingtobeusefulininvestigationsinvolvingexperimental
chemotherapyandinflammatoryresponse.Besides,the
combina-tionofhighsensitivityandspecificity,lowcontaminationriskand
greaterspeedofworkconfirmthereal-timePCRtechnologyasa
moderntool toassist instudiesinvolvingthecourseofChagas’
infectioninexperimentalchemotherapy.
Acknowledgments
This work received financial support from the Drugs for
NeglectedDiseaseInitiative(DNDi;Geneva,Switzerland),theUBS
OptimusFoundationofSwitzerland,RedeMineiradeBioterismo
(FAPEMIG),UniversidadeFederaldeOuroPreto,andresearch
fel-lowshipsfromConselhoNacionaldeDesenvolvimentoCientíficoe
Tecnológico(Bahia,M.T.andTalvani,A.),fromFundac¸ãodeAmparo
àPesquisadoEstadodeMinasGerais(Caldas,S.)andCoordenac¸ão
deAperfeic¸oamentodePessoaldeNívelSuperior(CAPES)(Caldas,
I.S.).
References
Aliberti,J.C., Machado, F.S.,Souto,J.T.,Campanelli, A.P., Teixeira,M.M., Gazz-inelli, R.T.,Silva, J.S.,1999. Beta-Chemokinesenhance parasiteuptakeand promotenitricoxide-dependentmicrobiostaticactivityinmurine inflamma-torymacrophagesinfectedwithTrypanosomacruzi.InfectionandImmunity67, 4819–4826.
Bankowski,M.J.,Anderson,S.M.,2004.Real-timenucleicacidamplificationin clin-icalmicrobiology.ClinicalMicrobiologyNews26,9–15.
Benvenuti,L.A.,Roggerio,A.,Freitas,H.F.,Mansur,A.J.,Fiorelli,A.,Higuchi,M.L.,2008. ChronicAmericantrypanosomiasis:parasitepersistenceinendomyocardial biopsiesisassociatedwithhigh-grademyocarditis.AnnalsofTropicalMedicine andParasitology102,481–487.
Brener,Z.,1962.Therapeuticactivityandcriterionofcureonmiceexperimentally infectedwithTrypanosomacruzi.RevistadoInstitutodeMedicinaTropicalde SaoPaulo4,389–396.
Caldas,I.S.,Talvani,A.,Caldas,S.,Carneiro,C.M.,Lana,M.,Guedes,P.M.M.,Bahia, M.T.,2008.BenznidazoletherapyduringacutephaseofChagasdiseasereduces parasiteloadbutdoesnotpreventchroniccardiaclesions.ParasitologyResearch 103,413–421.
Chagas,C.,1909.Novatripanosomíasehumana:estudossobreamorfologiaeo cicloevolutivodoSchizotrypanumcruzin.gen.n.sp.,agenteetiológicodenova entidademórbidadohomem.MemoriasdoInstitutoOswaldoCruz1,159–218. Cockerill,F.R.,2003.Applicationofrapid-cyclereal-timepolymerasechain reac-tionfordiagnostictestingintheclinicalmicrobiologylaboratory.Archivesof PathologyandLaboratoryMedicine127,1112–1120.
Coelho,P.S.,Klein,A.,Talvani,A.,Coutinho,S.F.,Takeuchi,O.,Akira,S.,Silva,J.S., Can-izzaro,H.,Gazzinelli,R.T.,Teixeira,M.M.,2002. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored mucin-like glycoproteins isolated from Trypanosoma cruzi try-pomastigotes induce invivo leukocyterecruitment dependent on MCP-1 productionbyIFN-gamma-primed-macrophages.JournalofLeukocyteBiology 71,837–844.
Cummings,K.L.,Tarleton,R.L.,2003.RapidquantitationofTrypanosomacruziinhost tissuebyreal-timePCR.MolecularandBiochemicalParasitology129,53–59.
deFreitas,V.L.,daSilva,S.C.,Sartori,A.M.,Bezerra,R.C.,Westphalen,E.V.,Molina, T.D.,Teixeira,A.R.,Ibrahim,K.Y.,Shikanai-Yasuda,M.A.,2011.Real-timePCR inHIV/TrypanosomacruzicoinfectionwithandwithoutChagasdisease reacti-vation:associationwithHIVviralloadandCD4level.PLoSNeglectedTropical Diseases5,e1277.
Dias,J.C.,1992.EpidemiologyofChagasdisease.In:Wendel,S.,Brener,Z.,Camargo, M.S.,Rassi,A.(Eds.),Chagasdisease(AmericanTrypanosomiasis):itsimpacton transfusionandclinicalmedicine.ISBTBrasil,SãoPaulo,pp.49–80.
Dias,J.C.,Silveira,A.C.,Schofield,C.J.,2002.TheimpactofChagasdisease con-trolin LatinAmerica: areview. MemoriasdoInstituto OswaldoCruz97, 603–612.
Duffy,T.,Bisio,M.,Altcheh,J.,Burgos,J.M.,Diez,M.,Levin,M.J.,Favaloro,R.R., Freilij,H.,Schijman,A.G.,2009.Accuratereal-timePCRstrategyformonitoring bloodstreamparasiticloadsinchagasdiseasepatients.PLoSNeglectedTropical Diseases3,e419.
Elias,M.C.,Vargas,N.,Tomazi,L.,Pedroso,A.,Zingales,B.,Schenkman,S.,Briones, M.R.,2005.Comparativeanalysisofgenomic sequencessuggeststhat Try-panosomacruziCLBrenercontainstwosetsofnon-intercalatedrepeatsof satelliteDNAthatcorrespondtoT.cruziIandT.cruziIItypes.Molecularand BiochemicalParasitology140,221–227.
Filardi,L.S.,Brener,Z.,1987.SusceptibilityandnaturalresistanceofTrypanosoma cruzistrainstodrugsusedclinicallyinChagasdisease.TransactionsoftheRoyal SocietyofTropicalMedicineandHygiene81,755–759.
Gascon,J.,Albajar,P.,Canas,E.,Flores,M.,Prat,J.,Herrera,R.N.,Lafuente,C.A., Lucia-rdi,H.L.,Moncayo,A.,Molina,L.,Munoz,J.,Puente,S.,Sanz,G.,Trevino,B., Sergio-Salles,X.,2007.Diagnosis,managementandtreatmentofchronic Cha-gas’heartdiseaseinareaswhereTrypanosomacruziinfectionisnotendemic. RevistaEspanoladeCardiologia60,285–293.
Gonzalez,A.,Prediger,E.,Huecas,M.E.,Nogueira,N.,Lizardi,P.M.,1984. Minichromo-somalrepetitiveDNAinTrypanosomacruzi:itsuseinahigh-sensitivityparasite detectionassay.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesoftheUnited StatesofAmerica81,3356–3360.
Hardison,J.L.,Wrightsman,R.A.,Carpenter,P.M.,Kuziel,W.A.,Lane,T.E.,Manning, J.E.,2006.TheCCchemokinereceptor5isimportantincontrolofparasite repli-cationandacutecardiacinflammationfollowinginfectionwithTrypanosoma cruzi.InfectionandImmunity74,135–143.
Junqueira,A.C.,Chiari,E.,Wincker,P.,1996.Comparisonofthepolymerasechain reactionwithtwoclassicalparasitologicalmethodsforthediagnosisofChagas diseaseinanendemicregionofnorth-easternBrazil.TransactionsoftheRoyal SocietyofTropicalMedicineandHygiene90,129–132.
Kirchhoff,L.V.,Votava,J.R.,Ochs,D.E.,Moser,D.R.,1996.ComparisonofPCRand microscopicmethodsfordetectingTrypanosomacruzi.JournalofClinical Micro-biology34,1171–1175.
Luster,A.D.,2002.Theroleofchemokinesinlinkinginnateandadaptiveimmunity. CurrentOpinioninImmunology14,129–135.
Machado,F.S.,Martins,G.A.,Aliberti,J.C.,Mestriner,F.L.,Cunha,F.Q.,Silva,J.S., 2000.Trypanosomacruzi-infectedcardiomyocytesproducechemokinesand cytokinesthattriggerpotentnitricoxide-dependenttrypanocidalactivity. Cir-culation102,3003–3008.
Machado,F.S.,Souto,J.T.,Rossi,M.A.,Esper,L.,Tanowitz,H.B.,Aliberti,J.,Silva,J.S., 2008.Nitricoxidesynthase-2modulateschemokineproductionbyTrypanosoma cruzi-infectedcardiacmyocytes.MicrobesandInfection10,1558–1566. Marcon,G.E.,Andrade,P.D.,deAlbuquerque,D.M.,Wanderley,J.S.,deAlmeida,E.A.,
Guariento,M.E.,Costa,S.C.,2002.Useofanestedpolymerasechainreaction (N-PCR)todetectTrypanosomacruziinbloodsamplesfromchronicchagasic patientsandpatientswithdoubtfulserologies.DiagnosticMicrobiologyand InfectiousDisease43,39–43.
Moreno,M.,D’avila,D.A.,Silva,M.N.,Galvão,L.M.,Macedo,A.M.,Chiari,E.,Gontijo, E.D.,Zingales,B.,2010.Trypanosomacruzibenznidazolesusceptibilityinvitro doesnotpredictthetherapeuticoutcomeofhumanChagasdisease.Memorias doInstitutoOswaldoCruz105,918–924.
Moser,D.R.,Kirchhoff,L.V.,Donelson,J.E.,1989.DetectionofTrypanosomacruzi byDNAamplificationusingthepolymerasechainreaction.JournalofClinical Microbiology27,1477–1482.
Paiva,C.N.,Figueiredo,R.T.,Kroll-Palhares,K.,Silva,A.A.,Silverio,J.C.,Gibaldi,D., Pyrrho,A.S.,Benjamim,C.F.,Lannes-Vieira,J.,Bozza,M.T.,2009.CCL2/MCP-1
controlsparasiteburden,cellinfiltration,andmononuclearactivationduring acuteTrypanosomacruziinfection.JournalofLeukocyteBiology86,1239–1246. Pérez-Fuentes,R.,Guégan,J.F.,Barnabé,C.,López-Colombo,A.,Salgado-Rosas,H., Torres-Rasgado,E.,Briones,B.,Romero-Díaz,M.,Ramos-Jiménez,J., Sánchez-Guillén, M.C.,2003. Severity ofchronic Chagasdisease is associated with cytokine/antioxidantimbalanceinchronicallyinfectedindividuals. Interna-tionalJournalforParasitology33,293–299.
Piron,M.,Fisa,R.,Casamitjana,N.,Lopez-Chejade,P.,Puig,L.,Verges,M.,Gascon,J., Prat,J.,Portus,M.,Sauleda,S.,2007.Developmentofareal-timePCRassayfor Trypanosomacruzidetectioninbloodsamples.ActaTropica103,195–200. Roggero,E.,Perez,A.,Tamae-Kakazu,M.,Piazzon,I.,Nepomnaschy,I.,Wietzerbin,
J.,Serra,E.,Revelli,S.,Bottasso,O.,2002.Differentialsusceptibilitytoacute Try-panosomacruziinfectioninBALB/candC57BL/6miceisnotassociatedwith adistinctparasiteloadbutcytokineabnormalities.ClinicalandExperimental Immunology128,421–428.
Saeftel, M., Fleischer, B., Hoerauf, A., 2001. Stage-dependent role of nitric oxideincontrolofTrypanosomacruziinfection.InfectionandImmunity69, 2252–2259.
Sallusto,F.,Lanzavecchia,A.,Mackay,C.R.,1998.Chemokinesandchemokine recep-torsinT-cellprimingandTh1/Th2-mediatedresponses.ImmunologyToday19, 568–574.
Schijman,A.G.,Vigliano,C.A.,Viotti,R.J.,Burgos,J.M.,Brandariz,S.,Lococo,B.E.,Leze, M.I.,Armenti,H.A.,Levin,M.J.,2004.TrypanosomacruziDNAincardiaclesions ofArgentineanpatientswithend-stagechronicchagasheartdisease.American JournalofTropicalMedicineandHygiene70,210–220.
Schofield,C.J.,Jannin,J.,Salvatella,R.,2006.ThefutureofChagasdiseasecontrol. TrendsinParasitology22,583–588.
Stegelmann,F.,Bastian,M., Swoboda,K., Bhat, R.,Kiessler, V.,Krensky,A.M., Roellinghoff,M.,Modlin,R.L.,Stenger,S.,2005.CoordinateexpressionofCC chemokineligand5,granulysin,andperforininCD8+Tcellsprovidesahost defensemechanismagainstMycobacteriumtuberculosis.JournalofImmunology 175,7474–7483.
Stordeur,P.,Poulin,L.F.,Craciun,L.,Zhou,L.,Schandené,L.,deLavareille,A.,Goriely, S.,Goldman,M.,2002.CytokinemRNAquantificationbyreal-timePCR.Journal ofImmunologicalMethods259,55–64.
Talvani,A.,Coutinho,S.F.,Barcelos,L.S.,Teixeira,M.M.,2009.CyclicAMPdecreases theproductionofNOandCCL2bymacrophagesstimulatedwithTrypanosoma cruziGPI-mucins.ParasitologyResearch104,1141–1148.
Talvani,A.,Ribeiro,C.S.,Aliberti,J.C.,Michailowsky,V.,Santos,P.V.,Murta,S.M., Romanha,A.J.,Almeida,I.C.,Farber,J.,Lannes-Vieira,J.,Silva,J.S.,Gazzinelli, R.T.,2000.Kineticsofcytokinegeneexpressioninexperimentalchagasic car-diomyopathy:tissueparasitismand endogenousIFN-gammaasimportant determinants of chemokinemRNA expressionduring infectionwith Try-panosomacruzi.MicrobesandInfection2,851–866.
Talvani,A.,Teixeira,M.M.,2011.InflammationandChagasdisease:some mecha-nismsandrelevance.AdvancesinParasitology76,171–194.
Teixeira,M.M.,Gazzinelli,R.T.,Silva,J.S.,2002.Chemokines,inflammationand Try-panosomacruziinfection.TrendsinParasitology18,262–265.
Toledo,M.J.,Bahia,M.T.,Carneiro,C.M.,martins-filho,O.A.,Tibayrenc,M.,Barnabé,C., Tafuri,W.L.,Lana,M.,2003.Chemotherapywithbenznidazoleanditraconazole formiceinfectedwithdifferentTrypanosomacruziclonalgenotypes. Antimicro-bialAgentsandChemotherapy47,223–230.
Urbina,J.A.,2010.SpecificchemotherapyofChagasdisease:relevance,current lim-itationsandnewapproaches.ActaTropica115,55–68.
Vespa,G.N.,Cunha, F.Q.,Silva,J.S., 1994.Nitricoxideis involvedincontrolof Trypanosomacruzi-inducedparasitemiaanddirectlykillstheparasiteinvitro. InfectionandImmunity62,5177–5182.
Villalta,F.,Zhang,Y.,Bibb,K.E.,Kappes,J.C.,Lima,M.F.,1998.Thecysteine-cysteine familyofchemokinesRANTES,MIP-1alpha,andMIP-1betainducetrypanocidal activityinhumanmacrophagesvianitricoxide.InfectionandImmunity66, 4690–4695.
WorldHealthOrganization(WHO),2002.ControlofChagasdisease.SecondReport oftheWHOExpertCommittee.WHOTechnicalReportSeries.905,Geneva,109p. Zhang,L.,Tarleton,R.L.,1999.Parasitepersistencecorrelateswithdiseaseseverity andlocalizationinchronicChagas’disease.JournalofInfectiousDiseases180, 480–486.