• Nenhum resultado encontrado

J. Pediatr. (Rio J.) vol.92 número3

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "J. Pediatr. (Rio J.) vol.92 número3"

Copied!
3
0
0

Texto

(1)

JPediatr(RioJ).2016;92(3):217---219

www.jped.com.br

EDITORIAL

Social

and

biological

determinants

of

growth

and

development

in

underprivileged

societies

,

夽夽

Determinantes

sociais

e

biológicos

do

crescimento

e

desenvolvimento

em

sociedades

menos

favorecidas

Mijna

Hadders-Algra

BeatrixChildren’sHospital,UniversityMedicalCenterGroningen,Groningen,TheNetherlands

The stimulating study by da Rocha Neves et al. (in this issue)1addressestheroleofsocialandbiologicalfactorsin

growthand developmentof youngchildren in a disadvan-tagedsociety.Theauthorsassessedagroupof92children, aged 24---36 months, whoin 2011 attended the municipal earlychildhoodeducationnetworkinatownintheValedo Jequitinhonharegion.ThisregioninthesoutheastofBrazil isconsideredeconomicallyunderprivileged.Thestudywas restricted to children with typical development, which meant that the children did not suffer from an evident congenital or acquired disability. Growth was assessedby meansofstandardanthropometrics,withafocuson height-for-age, a valid tool to assess childhood malnutrition.2

DevelopmentwasmeasuredwiththeBayleyScalesofInfant and Toddler Development (BSITD-III),3 the gold standard

to measure developmental outcome at early age. The cognitive score and the expressive language scores were usedasoutcome parameters. Biologicalrisk was assessed byafewperinatalfactors,suchasgestationalageatbirth, birthweight,pregnancycomplications,andthenumberof prenatal consultations, and a few childhood parameters, includingbreastfeeding,thepresenceof chronicdiseases,

DOIoforiginalarticle:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2015.08.007 夽

Pleasecitethisarticleas:Hadders-AlgraM.Socialand

biolog-icaldeterminants ofgrowthand developmentin underprivileged

societies.JPediatr(RioJ).2016;92:217---9.

夽夽

SeepaperbydaRochaNevesetal.inpages241---50.

E-mail:m.hadders-algra@umcg.nl

infectious diseases, and hospital admissions. The social environment was documented extensively, not only by means of parental level of education, the number of siblings,and the numberof people in the household,but also with standardized questionnaires to assess (a) the economicsituation(withthequestionnaireoftheBrazilian AssociationofResearchCompanies[Associac¸ãoBrasileirade EmpresasdePesquisa]);(b) thequalityofearly childhood education (with the Infant/Toddler Environment Rating Scale --- Revised); (c) the quality of the home environ-ment (with the Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (HOME) Inventory); and (d) the quality of the neighborhood (with a self-developed question-naire including questions on accessibility and quality of services).

The results confirmed that the children had a socially disadvantagedbackground.Thiswasreflectedbythefinding thatabout90%ofthefathershadnotcompletedhighschool, and that approximately half of the children did not live withbothparents.Thelargemajorityofchildrenwereborn atterm(94%),withoutsignsofsevereintrauterinegrowth restriction. Almost half of the children had had chronic and/or infectious diseases in thethree months preceding thestudy.

Impairedgrowth,definedasheight-for-agefallingbelow twostandarddeviationsofthenorm,occurredin15%of chil-dren.Multivariableanalysisindicated thatstuntedgrowth wasassociatedwithbirthweightandthenumberofprenatal consultations.Noneofthemanysocialfactorscontributed to impaired growth. This suggests that early childhood growthislargelydeterminedbythequalityofprenatallife.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2016.02.001

0021-7557/©2016SociedadeBrasileiradePediatria.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-ND

(2)

218 Hadders-AlgraM

Thechild’sprenatalcondition,inturn,isbasedonacomplex interactionofbiologicalandsocialfactors,inwhich psycho-logicalandphysiologicalstressduringpregnancy,including infectionsandinadequatenutrition,playarole.4High

lev-els of psychosocial stress are not only associated with a lowerbirthweight,but alsowithalowernumber of ante-natalconsultations.5

Interestingly, the study by da Rocha Neves et al.1

reportedthatnoneofthechildrenwerethin,whereas over-weight occurred in 4.4% of children. Nowadays, not only is impaired growth related to disadvantaged social con-ditions; overweight is also associated with low parental education,large householdsize,andlowersocioeconomic status.6Inaddition,increasingevidencesuggeststhatboth

impairedgrowthinearlylifeandchildhoodoverweightput the child at increased risk for cardiovascular disease in adulthood.7

Almost30% ofthechildren hadacognitiveimpairment or language impairment --- impairments defined as scores fallingonestandarddeviationbelowthemean.Incontrastto stuntedgrowth,cognitiveandlanguagedevelopmentwere not associated with biological risk factors, but only with socialones.Cognitivedevelopmentwasassociatedwiththe HOMEscore;languagedevelopmentwasassociatedwiththe HOMEscoreandthe qualityofthe neighborhoodin terms ofinfrastructure,andinteractionandtrust.The data sug-gestthatchildhoodcognitiveandlanguagedevelopmentin disadvantagedcommunitiesarestronglydependenton envi-ronmentalconditions,implyingthatimprovementofthese environmentalconditionsmaypromotechilddevelopment. Indeed,the reviewofKomro etal.8 indicatedthat

strate-gies that aim at the enhancement of social cohesion and improvement of the physical environment are associated withbettercognitivedevelopmentandchildhealth. How-ever,whetherspecificearlyinterventionprogramsthataim toteachparentshowtheybestcanstimulatetheir child’s development---programsthatareeffectiveininfantsat bio-logicalriskforcognitiveimpairment9---arealsoeffectivein

promotingcognitivedevelopmentinchildrenfromsocially disadvantagedfamiliesisnotclear.10

Does the absence of a contribution of biological fac-tors to impaired cognitive outcome imply that biological factorsdonotplayaroleindevelopmentaloutcomeof chil-dren in underprivileged societies? Presumably, that is not thecorrectconclusion. Inthe firstplace, daRochaNeves etal.assessedonlyafewprenatal,perinatal,andneonatal factors. For instance, no data were available on mater-nalprepregnancyweight,maternaldiseases,andmaternal smoking during pregnancy, as well as perinatal asphyxia. Thesefactorsareknowntohaveanadverseeffecton long-termdevelopmentaloutcome.11,12Forexample,termborn

infants prenatally exposed to maternal smoking on aver-agehavea10-pointreductionoftheirintelligencequotient (IQ)comparedtopeerswhohavenotbeexposedto mater-nalsmokingprenatally.13Secondly,developmentaloutcome

focused on cognitiveand language development,and the outcome of the psychomotor developmental index of the BSITD-III was not reported. It is conceivable that motor developmentat2---3yearsofagediddependonearly biolog-icalfactors,suchasbirthweightandgestationalage.Animal experiments14andearlyinterventionstudies9bothindicate

thatmotordevelopmentismorehardwiredinthebrainthan

cognitive development, implying that the former is more stronglydeterminedbybiologythanthelatter.Thirdly,da RochaNevesetal.assesseddevelopmentaloutcomeat2---3 years.Atthatage,onlyapartofcognitivefunctionshave been developed. With increasing age and with increasing complexityofthenervoussystem,newcognitivefunctions develop. Itis firstwiththeappearanceof afunction that theimpairmentof thatfunctioncan bediagnosed.This is the reasonthatmost cognitiveimpairments andcognitive and behavioral disorders first emerge at school age.15 It

is conceivable that with increasing age, the contribution ofearlybiologicalandsocialfactorsoncognitiveoutcome changes.Atearlyage---asdaRochaNevesetal.reported ---theinfluenceofsocialfactorsmaydominate.Butitmaybe surmised thatat schoolagetheimpactofearly biological factorsincreases,inlinewiththedevelopmentalorigin of healthanddiseasehypothesis.16,17Increasingevidence

sug-geststhatprenatalandperinataladversitiesmayhavealong lastingeffectondevelopmentandheath.16,18

The study by da Rocha Neves et al. draws the atten-tiontotheneedforimprovedantenatalandearlychildhood care in orderto facilitate child health and development. The first steptobetaken is toimproveprenatal care, in whichanadequatenumberofantenatalconsultationsplays apivotalrole.Notonlyisalownumberofantenatalvisits associatedwithstuntedgrowth---asthestudybydaRocha Nevesetal.demonstrated---itisalsoawell-knownrisk fac-torofneonatalmortalityandmorbidity.19TheWorldHealth

Organization (WHO) recommends at least four antenatal care visits, with the initial visitoccurring during the first trimester,thesecondbetween24and28weeksofgestation, andthethird andfourthat 32and36weeksofgestation, respectively.19 Factors that prevent women from

receiv-inganadequatenumberofpregnancyconsultationsinclude poverty,lackofinformation,thedistancetotheantenatal careservice,inadequateservices,andculturalpractices.20

This means that the biology of early lifeis largely deter-minedbysocio-economicconditions.Notonlyprenatalcare should betargeted toimprove child growth and develop-ment;postnatalrearingconditionsalsohaveastrongimpact onchilddevelopment.AsthestudybydaRochaNevesetal. demonstrated,thechild’scognitivedevelopmentislargely dependent on thehome environment, includingthe qual-ityofcaregiving,parentalresponsivity,andthepresenceof learningmaterial.

The outcome of the study by da Rocha Neves et al. stresses the need for long-term follow-up of infants who grow upineconomicallydisadvantaged situations.Only in this way will we understand how the complex interac-tion of biological and social adversities during early life impacts growth,health ---including cardiovasculardisease andobesity---anddevelopmentaloutcome,including cogni-tiveimpairmentsandpsychiatricmorbidity.Onlyinthisway willweknowwhichtypeofsocialandhealthservices dur-ingpregnancyandduringchildhoodareneededtoachieve optimalchildhealthanddevelopment.

Conflicts

of

interest

(3)

Socialandbiologicaldeterminantsofgrowthanddevelopment 219

References

1.da Rocha Neves K, de Souza Morais RL, Teixeira RA, Pinto PA.Growth and development and their environmental and biological determinants. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2016;92: 241---50.

2.Restrepo-MéndezMC,BarrosAJ, BlackRE,Victora CG.Time trendsinsocio-economic inequalitiesin stuntingprevalence: analyses of repeated national surveys. Public Health Nutr. 2015;18:2097---104.

3.BayleyN. BayleyScales ofInfant and Toddler Development: technicalmanual.3rded.SanAntonio:HarcourtAssessment; 2006.

4.HodnettED,FredericksS,WestonJ.Supportduringpregnancy forwomenatincreasedriskoflowbirthweightbabies.Cochrane DatabaseSystRev.2010:CD000198.

5.Brown SJ, Yelland JS, Sutherland GA, Baghurst PA, Robin-son JS. Stressful life events, social health issues and low birthweight in an Australian population-based birth cohort: challenges and opportunities in antenatal care. BMC Public Health.2011;11:196.

6.KeinoS,PlasquiG,EttyangG,vandenBorneB.Determinantsof stuntingandoverweightamongyoungchildrenandadolescents insub-SaharanAfrica.FoodNutrBull.2014;35:167---78.

7.RobinsonSM,BarkerDJ.Coronaryheartdisease:adisorderof growth.ProcNutrSoc.2002;61:537---42.

8.Komro KA, Tobler AL, Delisle AL, O’Mara RJ, Wagenaar AC. Beyondthe clinic: improvingchild health through evidence-based community development. BMC Pediatr. 2013;13: 172.

9.SpittleA,OrtonJ,AndersonPJ,BoydR,DoyleLW.Early devel-opmentalinterventionprogrammesprovidedposthospital dis-chargetopreventmotorandcognitiveimpairmentinpreterm infants.CochraneDatabaseSystRev.2015;11:CD005495.

10.MillerS,Maguire LK,Macdonald G.Home-based child devel-opment interventions for preschool children from socially

disadvantaged families. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011: CD008131.

11.ErgazZ,OrnoyA.Perinatalandearlypostnatalfactors under-lyingdevelopmentaldelayanddisabilities.DevDisabilResRev. 2011;17:59---70.

12.KeracM,PostelsDG,MallewaM,AlusineJallohA,VoskuijlWP, GroceN,etal.Theinteractionofmalnutritionandneurologic disabilityinAfrica.SeminPediatrNeurol.2014;21:42---9.

13.de JongC,KikkertHK,Fidler V,Hadders-AlgraM. Effectsof long-chainpolyunsaturatedfattyacidsupplementationofinfant formulaoncognitionandbehaviourat9yearsofage.DevMed ChildNeurol.2012;54:1102---8.

14.KolbB, MychasiukR,WilliamsP,GibbR.Brainplasticity and recovery from early cortical injury. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:4---8.

15.Hadders-AlgraM.Generalmovements:awindowforearly iden-tificationofchildrenathighriskfordevelopmentaldisorders. JPediatr.2004;145:S12---8.

16.Räikkönen K, Pesonen AK. Early life origins of psycho-logical development and mental health. Scand J Psychol. 2009;50:583---91.

17.Hadders-Algra M. Two distinct forms of minor neurological dysfunction: perspectives emerging from a review of data of the Groningen Perinatal Project. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002;44:561---71.

18.WhitakerAH,FeldmanJF,LorenzJM,ShenS,McNicholasF,Nieto M,etal.Motorandcognitiveoutcomesinnondisabled low-birth-weightadolescents:earlydeterminants.ArchPediatrAdolesc Med.2006;160:1040---6.

19.MbuagbawL,MedleyN,DarziAJ,RichardsonM,HabibaGarga K, Ongolo-ZogoP.Health systemand community level inter-ventions for improving antenatal care coverage and health outcomes.CochraneDatabaseSystRev.2015;12:CD010994.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Do ensaio também se concluiu que a remoção da pré-pintura em si, não é suficiente para reduzir todos os defeitos, havendo acréscimo dos defeitos de inclusões e macho partido, e

Skin color remained as an independent risk factor for low birth weight (P < 0.001), preterm birth (P = 0.01), small for gestational age (P = 0.01), and lack of prenatal care (P

Background maternal and neonatal data : maternal age, prenatal diagnosis, type of delivery, Apgar scores, birth weight, gestational age and sex; (B) Surgical modalities : primary

Weight-gain velocity rate increases over the phases and was associated with maternal (age) and infant (gestational age at birth, birthweight, gestational weight for age at birth,

variables analyzed were: gender, gestational age at birth, weight, birth conditions, delivery route, maternal age and to identify the clinical changes presented by the newborns

Objective: To investigate the relationship between gender, weight at birth, gestational age, risk factors for hearing loss, venue for newborn hearing screening and ‘‘pass’’

Most of the reference data for assessing birth weight for gestational age deal with insufficient sample size, especially at low gestational age.. Population-based studies

Skin color, taking antidepressants during pregnan- cy, pre-pregnancy weight, participation in prenatal care, violence suffered during pregnancy, gestation- al age at birth and