bor 29 1 BOR 2015vol290042

The results of this study demonstrate that mini-implants in groups 1 and 2 had a similar degree of mobility (Table 5) and no association was observed between

This case report describes the orthodontic treat- ment of a patient with Angle Class II malocclusion with impaction of the mandibular second molars, in which two mini-implants

Rough mini-implants presented higher secondary stability, with higher removal torque and lower final mobility when compared to smooth mini-implants, but without

The recommended insertion technique for mini- implants is placement at an angle relative to the long axis of teeth to help the screw reach the uppermost portion of the alveolar

The effect of a bacterial con- tamination on the formation of capsular contracture with polyurethane breast implants in comparison with textured silicone implants: an animal

Materials with greater cell wall fraction showed higher basic density, reducing the dimensional stability, and with the lower mocrofibril angle, improved the mechanical properties

It was concluded that there was no significant difference in in vitro bacterial sealing between implants with mini-abutments tightened by friction without screws and implants

In this case report, the dental prosthesis with mini- implants was satisfactory for prosthetic retention.. The mini-implants allowed greater retention of prosthesis and a