rev bras ortop.2014;49(4):401–404
w w w . r b o . o r g . b r
Case
Report
Garré’s
sclerosing
osteomyelitis:
case
report
夽
,
夽夽
Frederico
Barra
de
Moraes
a,∗,
Tainá
Melo
Vieira
Motta
a,
Alessandra
Assis
Severin
a,
Deniel
de
Alencar
Faria
a,
Fernanda
de
Oliveira
César
a,
Siderlei
de
Souza
Carneiro
baDepartmentofOrthopedicsandTraumatology,SchoolofMedicine,UniversidadeFederaldeGoiás,Goiânia,GO,Brazil bAnatomopathologyService,SchoolofMedicine,UniversidadeFederaldeGoiás,Goiânia,GO,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received22April2013 Accepted12July2013 Availableonline24April2014
Keywords:
Osteomyelitis/diagnosis Osteomyelitis/surgery Osteomyelitis/therapy
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
TheaimofthisstudywastoreportonararecaseofGarré’ssclerosingosteomyelitis.The patientwasa54-year-oldwomanwithahistoryoftreatmentforlupususingcorticoidsfor 20years,andforosteoporosisusingalendronateforfiveyears.Shepresentededemaand developedalimitationofleftkneemovementoneyearearlier,withmildeffusionandpain onmetaphysealpalpation,butwithoutfever.Shewasinagoodgeneralstate,withoutlocal secretion.Imagesofherkneeshowedtrabecularosteolysisofthedistalmetaphysisofthe femurandaperiostealreactioninbothproximaltibiasandbothdistalfemurs, compati-blewithchronicosteomyelitisoflowvirulenceandslowprogression.Magneticresonance imagingshowedT2hypersignalinthefemurandtibia.Curettagewasperformedonthe leftdistal femur,withreleaseofsecretion,butthiswasnegativeonculturing.Abiopsy showedchronicinfectionandinflammation,fibrosis,xanthogranulomatousreactionand fociofsuppuration.Antibiotictherapywasadministeredforsixmonths.Theetiologywas notclarified:bacterialinfectionwassuspected,butculturingwasgenerallynegative.The chronicprocesswasmaintainedbylow-virulenceinfectionorevenaftertreatment.The dif-ferentialdiagnoseswerefibrousdysplasia,syphilis,pustulosispalmoplantaris,rectocolitis, Crohn’sdisease,SAPHO(synovitis,acne,pustulosis,hyperostosisandosteitis)andPaget’s disease.Theunifocaldiseaseswereosteoidosteoma,Ewing’sdisease,osteosarcomaand eosinophilicgranuloma.
©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora Ltda.Allrightsreserved.
Osteomielite
esclerosante
de
Garrè:
relato
de
caso
Palavras-chave:
Osteomielite/diagnóstico Osteomielite/cirurgia Osteomielite/terapia
r
e
s
u
m
o
RelatarumcasorarodeosteomieliteesclerosantedeGarrè.Pacientefeminino,54anos, comhistóriadetratamentodelúpuscomcorticoidehavia20anoseosteoporose,emuso dealendronatohaviacincoanos.Apresentavaedemaelimitac¸ãodojoelhoesquerdohavia umano,derrameleve,doràpalpac¸ãometafisária,afebril,bomestadogeral,semsecrec¸ão local.Imagensdojoelhoevidenciaramosteólisetrabeculardametáfisedistaldofêmure reac¸ãoperiostealnasduastíbiasproximaisenosdoisfêmuresdistais,compatíveiscom
夽Pleasecitethisarticleas:deMoraesFB,MottaTMV,SeverinAA,deAlencarFariaD,deOliveiraCésarF,deSouzaCarneiroS.Osteomielite
esclerosantedeGarrè:relatodecaso.RevBrasOrtop.2014;49:401–404.
夽夽WorkperformedintheDepartmentofOrthopedicsandTraumatology,SchoolofMedicine,UniversidadeFederaldeGoiás,Goiânia,
GO,Brazil.
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mail:fredericobarra@yahoo.com.br(F.B.deMoraes).
2255-4971/$–seefrontmatter©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.
402
r e v b r a s o r t o p . 2014;49(4):401–404osteomielitecrônica,debaixavirulênciaeprogressãolenta.HipersinalemT2nofêmur etíbiaàressonância.Curetagemdofêmurdistalesquerdo,comsaídadesecrec¸ão,mas culturanegativa.Biópsiaevidenciouinfecc¸ãoeinflamac¸ãocrônica,fibrose,reac¸ão xan-togranulomatosaefocosdesupurac¸ão.Feitaantibioticoterapiaporseismeses.Etiologianão esclarecida,suspeitadeinfecc¸ãobacteriana,masgeralmenteaculturaénegativa,processo crônicomantidoporinfecc¸ãodebaixavirulênciaoumesmoapósotratamento. Diagnósti-cosdiferenciais:displasiafibrosa,sífilis,pustulosepalmoplantar,retocolite,Crohn,Sapho (sinovite,acne,pustulose,hiperostose,osteíte)ePaget.Unifocais:osteomaosteoide,Ewing, osteossarcomaegranulomaeosinofílico.
©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevier EditoraLtda.Todososdireitosreservados.
Introduction
Garré’sosteomyelitisisarareinflammatorydiseaseofchronic nature,characterizedbyperiostealreactions,whichinduces bone neoformation. It mainly affects the region of the mandibleand,inrarecases,maybelocatedinthe metaphy-sealregionofthelongbones.Thisdiseaseisalsoknownas Garré’ssclerosingosteomyelitis(GSO),chronicosteomyelitis withproliferativeperiostitis,chronicsclerosing osteomyeli-tis,ossifyingperiostitisornon-suppurativechronicsclerosing osteomyelitis.1–3Theclinicalconditionischaracterizedbyan insidiousstart,withlocalpain andreactionintheaffected bone.Thesymptomshaveanepisodicnon-progressivenature and may persist for several months. On the other hand, the duration ofGSO is very variable among patients, who may present the disease for several years. The function of the affected bone is generally preserved and, during the interval between crises, most patients are seen to be healthy.4,5
TheaimofthisstudywastoreportonararecaseofGarré’s sclerosingosteomyelitis,inwhichtheproximalregionofthe tibiasanddistalregionofthefemurswereaffectedina 54-year-oldpatient.
Case
report
Thepatientwasa54-year-oldwomanwithahistoryof treat-mentforlupususingcorticoid,overthepreceding20years. Shepresentedsevereosteoporosisandhadbeenusing alen-dronate for five years. The specific clinical condition had beenevolvingovertheprecedingyear,withpain,edemaand chroniclimitationofmovementinherleftknee,which pre-sentedslightjointeffusionandpainonpalpationofthedistal femoralmetaphysis.Shewasnotfebrile,inagood general stateandwithoutreddeningordischargeofsecretionsatthe site.
Radiographsandtomographicscanswereproducedonthe leftknee.Theimagesshowedtrabecularosteolysisofthe dis-tal metaphysisofthe left femurand periostealreaction in bothproximaltibiasandbothdistalfemurs.Thiswas com-patiblewithchronicosteomyelitis,oflowvirulenceandslow progression(Figs.1A–C,2A–Cand3A–B).Theimaging diag-nosiswascomplementedbymeansofmagneticresonance, whichshowedT2hypersignalbothinthefemurandinthe tibia,thusindicatingGSO.
Surgicaltreatmentconsistingofcurettageoftheleft dis-talfemurwasperformed.Puncturingthekneejointdidnot show anypurulentsecretion.Thebonewindowthusmade subsequently dischargedsecretion,but thisproduced nega-tive cultures. Thematerial obtained from the surgery was sentforbiopsyanalysis,whichshowedinfectionandchronic inflammationmarkedbyfibrosis,xanthogranulomatous reac-tion,fociofsuppurationandabsenceofacid-alcoholresistant bacilli(AARB),fungiorsignsofmalignity(Fig.4).
The patient underwent venous antibiotic therapy with oxacillin(4g/day)andsubsequentlyoralmedication consist-ingofcephalexin(2g/dayforsixmonths),withimprovement ofinflammationintheleftknee.
Discussion
Carl Alois Philipp Garré was a Swiss surgeon and bacteri-ologist who in 1893 published an article dealing with the manifestationsofosteomyelitis.Hisnamebecameassociated withthedisease,whichbecameknownasGarré’ssclerosing osteomyelitis,althoughhewasnotresponsiblefor describ-ingit.1,2 Hereportedthattherewasperipheralformationof a bone reaction due to irritation or mild infection, which resultedinthickeningoftheperiosteumoflongbones.The etiologyofthisdiseasehasstillnotbeenfullyclarified. Bac-terial infection issuspected, but the culturesare generally negativeandthechronicprocessmaybemaintainedthrough low-virulenceinfectionorevenaftertheinfectionhasbeen treated. If the germ cannotbe detectedthrough culturing, investigationbymeansofthepolymerasechainreaction(PCR) shouldberequested.3
Amultifocalsclerosingbonereactionwithclinical, radio-logical and histologicalcharacteristics similar to GSO may beencounteredinseveral diseases,suchasfibrous dyspla-sia,syphilis,pustulosispalmoplantaris,ulcerativerectocolitis, Crohn’sdisease,SAPHOsyndrome(synovitis,acne, pustulo-sis,hyperostosisandosteitis)andPaget’sdisease.Additional differential diagnoses in cases of unifocal sclerosing bone reaction may include osteoid osteoma, Ewing’s disease, osteosarcomaandeosinophilicgranuloma.3,4
r e v b r a s o r t o p . 2014;49(4):401–404
403
Fig.1–Radiographicappearanceofthelesion.(A)Radiographinanteroposteriorviewshowingperiostealreactioninthe femur.(B)Radiographinlateralviewshowingperiostealreactioninthetibia.(C)Radiographinlateralviewshowingdistal femuraftertheoperation,withabonewindowfordrainage,curettage,culturingandbiopsy,andshowingthevarious layersoftheperiostealreaction.
Fig.2–Computedtomographyoftheleftknee,withbonewindow,showingtrabecularosteolysisandperiostealreaction. Coronal(A),sagittal(B)andaxialslice(C).
osteomyelitis.5,6Anotherpointofinterestinthepresentcase canbehighlighted:useofcorticoidsisanimportant trigger-ingfactorforosteoporosis.Thus,itisreasonabletosuppose thatthetreatmentforlupusinthepresentcasemayhave con-tributedtowardtheappearanceofosteoporosisand,together, thetwodiseasesmayhavefavoreddevelopmentofGSO.
Chronicosteomyelitispresentslowmortalitybuthigh mor-bidity.Clinically,thechronicphaseisalwaysprecededbyan
acuteinfectiousprocess,withphlogisticsigns(pain,heat, red-ness,tumorgrowth,deformityand limitation).However,in patientswhohavebecomedebilitatedthroughotherdiseases, aswasthecaseinourpatient,theinitialconditionmaybe masked,whichhastheconsequencethatthediagnosiswill onlybecomepossibleinthechronicphase.7
Inrelationtotheimagingdiagnosis,Vasilievetal.8 eval-uated 121 patients between the ages of 4 and 74 years,
404
r e v b r a s o r t o p . 2014;49(4):401–404Fig.4–Histologicalstudyonbonebiopsyfromtheleftfemur,inhematoxylin-eosin(A)and(B),showinginfectionand chronicinflammationmarkedbyfibrosis,xanthogranulomatousreactionandfociofsuppurationindicativeofGSO.
withadiagnosisofosteomyelitisinlimbs.Themostprecise examination was spiral computed tomography, which had anaccuracyof96.7%,sensitivityof99.1%and specificityof 80%,whileradiographspresented81.8,84.9and60%, respec-tively.Inthebeginning,acombinationofscleroticareasand cysticareas couldbeobservedinthe regionofthe lesions, andthe latterisgraduallyreplacedbyscleroticareas. Dur-ingexacerbations,boneformationduetoperiostealreaction could be seen, resembling an onion skin. Thus, the dis-ease ismarked bythickening and sclerosis ofthe affected bone.3,8
Surgical treatment in association with antibiotic ther-apy is the best option for chronic osteomyelitis. Antibi-otic therapy alone is ineffective, independent of the administration route, because the “bone sequestration” found in the chronic disease comprises fragments of necrotic bone and thus does not present a blood sup-ply that would allow antibiotic to arrive at the infected tissue.3,7
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.GarrèCA,BorchardA.LehrbuchderChirurgie.London:Oxford UniversityPress;1920.
2.WoodRE,NortjéCJ,GrotepassF,SchmidtS,HarrisAM. PeriostitisossificansversusGarrè’sosteomyelitis.PartI.What didGarrèreallysay?OralSurgOralMedOralPathol.
1988;65(6):773–7.
3.VienneP,ExnerGU.Garrèsclerosingosteomyelitis.Orthopade. 1997;26(10):902–7.
4.Bernard-BonninAC,MartonD,BrochuP.Chronicsclerosing osteomyelitis(so-calledGarrè’s).Reviewof12cases.ArchFr Pediatr.1987;44(4):277–82.
5.VieiraCL,AyresdeMeloVEV.Osteomielite:relatodecaso clínico.IntJDent.2006;1(1):35–40.
6.XavierR,VecchiAA.Infecc¸õesosteoarticulares.In:HebertS, XavierR,PardiniJúniorAG,BarrosFilhoTEP,editors.Tratado deortopediaetraumatologia:princípiosepráticas.3rded. PortoAlegre:Artmed;2007.p.822–30.
7.SumaR,VinayC,ShashikanthMC,SubbaReddyVV.Garrè’s sclerosingosteomyelitis.JIndianSocPedodPrevDent.2007;25 Suppl.:S30–3.