• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. ortop. vol.48 número5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. ortop. vol.48 número5"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto

(1)

rev bras ortop.2013;48(5):412–416

w w w . r b o . o r g . b r

Original

Article

Anatomical

relationships

between

Wrisberg

meniscofemoral

and

posterior

cruciate

ligament’s

femoral

insertions

,

夽夽

Heetor

Campora

de

Sousa

Oliveira

a,∗

,

Julio

Cesar

Gali

b

,

Edie

Benedito

Caetano

c aFormerResidentattheSorocabaSchoolofMedicalSciencesandHealthcare,PontifíciaUniversidadeCatólicadeSãoPaulo

(FCMS-Sorocaba/PUC-SP);VoluntaryAttendingPhysicianintheOrthopedicsandTraumatologyService,FCMS-Sorocaba/PUC-SP, Sorocaba,SP,Brazil

bPhDinOrthopedicsandTraumatologyfromtheSchoolofMedicine,UniversityofSãoPaulo;VoluntaryAttendingPhysicianinthe

OrthopedicsandTraumatologyService,FCMS-Sorocaba/PUC-SP,Sorocaba,SP,Brazil

cFullProfessorandHeadoftheOrthopedicsandTraumatologyService,FCMS-Sorocaba/PUC-SP,Sorocaba,SP,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received11June2012

Accepted14August2012

Keywords:

Femur

Posteriorcrucianteligament

Tibialmenisci

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Objective:ToevaluatethefrequencyandmorphometryoftheWrisberg’sligamentandits

relationshipswiththeposteriorcruciateligament’sfemoralinsertion.

Studydesign:Controlledlaboratorystudy.

Methods:24unpairedkneepieces,12rightand12leftweresubmittedtoadeepdissectionof

theWrisbergandposteriorcruciateligaments.Thepieceswerephotographedwithadigital

cameraandruler;theImageJsoftwarewasusedtomeasuretheligaments’insertionareas,

insquaremillimeters.

Results:TheWrisbergligamentwaspresentin91.6%ofthestudiedpieces.Inthoseitsshape

wasellipticalin12pieces(54.54%).In68%oftheknees,theWLinsertionwasproximalto

themedialintercondilarridge,closetothePCLposteromedialbundle.Theaverageareafor

theWLwas20.46±6.12mm2.Thisnumbercorrespondedto23.3%ofthePCL’saveragearea.

Conclusions:WLligamentisacommonstructureinknees.Thereisawidevariationofits

insertionarea.ProportionallytothePCL’sinsertionareatheWLonessuggeststhatitmay

contributetotheposteriorstabilityofthekneejoint.

©2013SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora

Ltda.Allrightsreserved.

Pleasecite thisarticleas:Oliveira HCdS,GaliJC, CaetanoEB. Relac¸õesanatômicasentreasinserc¸õesfemorais dos ligamentos

meniscofemoraldeWrisbergecruzadoposterior.RevBrasOrtop.2013;48;412–416.

夽夽

StudyconductedattheSorocabaSchoolofMedicalSciencesandHealthcare,PontifíciaUniversidadeCatólicadeSãoPaulo,Sorocaba,

SP,Brazil.

Correspondingauthorat:Av.EugênioSalerno,387,CEP18035-430,Sorocaba,SP,Brazil.Fax:+1532290202.

E-mail:hectormed@bol.com.br(H.C.d.S.Oliveira).

2255-4971/$–seefrontmatter©2013SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.

(2)

Relac¸ões

anatômicas

entre

as

inserc¸ões

femorais

dos

ligamentos

meniscofemoral

de

Wrisberg

e

cruzado

posterior

Palavras-chave:

Fêmur

Ligamentocruzadoposterior

Meniscostibiais

r

e

s

u

m

o

Objetivo: AvaliarafrequênciaeamorfometriadoligamentomeniscofemoraldeWrisberge

arelac¸ãodesuasinserc¸õesfemoraiscomaquelasdoligamentocruzadoposterior(LCP).

Desenhodoestudo: Estudolaboratorialcontrolado.

Métodos: Foramfeitasdissecc¸õesminuciosasdasinserc¸õesfemorais dosligamentosde

Wrisberg(LW)edoLCPem24pec¸asanatômicasdejoelhos.Aspec¸asforamfotografadas

comumacâmeradigitalemarcadormilimetrado;oprogramaImageJfoiusadoparamedir

aáreadasinserc¸õesligamentares,emmilímetrosquadrados.

Resultados: OLWestevepresenteem91.6%daspec¸asestudadas.Nessas,seuformatofoi

elípticoem12pec¸as(54.54%).Em68%dosjoelhosainserc¸ãodoLWesteveproximalàcrista

intercondilarmedial,próximoàbandaposteromedialdoLCP.Aáreamédiadainserc¸ão

femoraldoLWfoide2046±6.12mm2,oquecorrespondeua23.3%daáreadeinserc¸ãodo

LCP.

Conclusões: OLWéestruturafrequentenosjoelhos,comgrandevariabilidadedesuaárea

média.ProporcionalmenteaoLCP,suaáreamédiasugerequeesseligamentopodecontribuir

paraaestabilidadeposteriordojoelho.

©2013SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevier

EditoraLtda.Todososdireitosreservados.

Introduction

The posterior meniscofemoral ligament, or Wrisberg

liga-ment, goes from the lateral aspect of the medial femoral

condyletotheposteriorcornuofthelateralmeniscus.Ithas

aposteriorlocationthatisveryclosetotheposteriorcruciate

ligament(PCL),withaslightlymoreobliquedirection(Fig.1).

Itsfrequencyofoccurrenceinhumansranges from90% to

93%.1–3

Thefirst descriptionofthe meniscofemoral ligament in

the medicalliterature was madeby Humphreyin 1858.In

1899,PoirierandCharpyreportedtwodistinctstructuresthat

Fig.1–Deepdissectionshowingtheposteriorcruciate ligament(PCL),Humphreymeniscofemoralligament(H), Wrisbergligament(W)andlateralmeniscus(LM).

startedfromtheposteriorcornuofthelateralmeniscusand

involvedthePCL(apudGupteetal.4).

Studies conducted more recently have also shown the

Wrisbergligamentformspartofacomplextogetherwiththe

PCLandremainstenseduringkneeextension.Itcontributes

towardposteriorstabilityandtowardharmoniousmovement

ofthelateralmeniscusduringflexionand extensionofthe

knee.5,6

Together with the anterior meniscofemoral ligament, it

actsasasecondarylimiterofposteriortranslationofthetibia,

anditaccountsfor35–45%ofthisactionwiththekneeflexed

at90◦.6,7

Theobjectiveofourstudywastoevaluatethefrequencyof

occurrenceoftheWrisbergligamentinthespecimens

ana-lyzed, the shape and area of its femoral insertion and its

relationshipwiththePCL.Inthismanner,wehopedtobeable

tocontributetowardexpandingtheanatomicalknowledgeof

theposteriorstabilizingcomplexoftheknee.

Methods

Twenty-fourunpairedanatomicalspecimensofadultknees

fromcadaverswerestudied(12rightkneesand12leftknees).

Allofthespecimenspresentedintactcruciateligamentsand

joint cartilage. None of the knees presented any signs of

arthrosis.Thespecimensusedhadbeenfixedin10%formol

andwereconservedinamixtureof2.5%phenol,2.5%formol

and1%sodiumchloride.

Weperformeddetaileddissectionoftheposterioraspect

ofthekneeusingascalpelwithaNo.11blade.Weisolated

theWrisbergligament,themenisciandthePCL,andwealso

identifiedtheanterolateralandposteromedial bandsofthe

PCL.

AfterisolatingtheWrisbergligamentandthebandsofthe

(3)

414

rev bras ortop.2013;48(5):412–416

Fig.2–Lateralviewofthemedialfemoralcondyleshowing themedialintercondylarridge,thefemoralinsertionsof theWrisbergligament(W)andtheanterolateral(AL)and posteromedial(PM)bandsofthePCL.

astohavebetterviewingofthestructures,andwedelimited

theirareasofinsertion.

Weusedamillimeterrulerplacedasthesamelevelasthe

insertionsandwephotographedthespecimensusingaCanon

EOSRebelT1idigitalcamera(Fig.2).Sincetheinsertionsofthe

WrisbergligamentandthePCLbandsarenotlocatedexactly

inthesameplane,theimageswereproducedas

perpendicu-larlyaspossibletotheanatomicalstructures,accordingtothe

regiontobestudied.

TheImageJsoftwarewasusedtocalculatethe

measure-mentsofinterest,inmillimetersorinsquaremillimeters.

Results

TheWrisbergligamentwasidentifiedin22ofthe24

speci-mensanalyzed(91.6%).Inthese,itsshapewasellipticalin12

specimens(54.54%).

Itsmean areaofinsertionwas20.26±6.12mm2 andthe

mean area of insertion of the PCL was 87.80±28.21mm2.

The mean areas of insertion of the anterolateral and

posteromedial bands were, respectively, 47.13±19.14 and

40.67±16.19mm2.

In68% ofthe knees,the insertionofthe Wrisberg

liga-mentwasproximaltothemedialintercondylarridge.Inmost

ofthespecimens(90.9%),theWrisbergligamentwascloser

to the posteromedial band than to the anterolateral band

(mean distancesbetween the insertioncenters of9.15mm

and14.18mm,respectively),althoughintwospecimensthe

situationwasthe inverse,probablybecauseofan

anatomi-calvariationinthelayoutofthePCLbandsthatpredisposed

towardthissituation(Fig.3).

Themeandistancesfromthecenteroftheareaof

inser-tionoftheWrisbergligamenttotheposterioranddistaljoint

cartilage ofthe medialfemoral condylewere 7.05mm and

10.16mm,respectively.Table1showsthemeansfoundinour

study.

Fig.3–Lateralviewofthemedialfemoralcondyleshowing thecenterofthefemoralinsertionoftheWrisbergligament (W)andtheanterolateral(AL)andposteromedial(PM) bandsofthePCL.

Discussion

The number of studies relating to the PCL has increased

substantially in the medical literature. The structures of

the posteriorcomplex,suchastheWrisbergligament,may

equallygaininimportancewithinreconstructivesurgical

pro-cedures.

ThedetailedspecificfunctionoftheWrisbergligamentis

stillnotfullyunderstood.Anatomicalstudieshavesuggested

thatitisimportantinrelationtotheharmonyofnormal

mobil-ity ofthe lateral meniscus and lateral femoralcondyle.8–11

Thus,itwouldalsocontributeindirectlytowardthehealthof

thelateralcompartmentofthekneejoint.12

Inourstudy,theWrisbergligamentwasfoundin91.6%of

thekneesevaluated.Inanatomicalstudiesintheliterature,

itsincidencemayrangefrom35%to76%.9,13–16Itispossible

thatwefoundtheWrisbergligamentinagreaterpercentage

ofspecimensthanwasseeninotherstudiesbecauseour

dis-sectionwasdoneinaverydetailedmanner,usingascalpel

withaNo.11 blade,withisolationofthestructuresalways

startingfromtheposteriorcornuofthelateralmeniscus.

Choetal.3andWatanabeetal.17 identifiedtheWrisberg

ligamentin66%and93%ofthemagneticresonanceimages

evaluated, respectively. These percentages would probably

havebeenevenhigherifequipmentofgreaterresolutionhad

beenused.

In68%ofthekneesofoursample,theinsertionofthe

Wris-bergligamentwasproximaltothemedialintercondylarridge.

However,accordingtoGupteetal.,4andalsoYamamotoand

Hirohata,13theWrisbergligamentwasalwaysinaproximal

locationinrelationtothemedialintercondylarridge.

Inourevaluation,themeanareaofinsertionofthe

Wris-berg ligament was 20.46±6.12mm2 and the mean area of

insertionofthePCLwas87.80±28.21mm2.Themeanareasof

(4)

r

e

v

b

r

a

s

o

r

t

o

p

.

2

0

1

3;

4

8(5)

:412–416

415

Column1 Column2 Column3 Column5 Column6 Column7 Column8 Column9 Column10 Column11 Column12 Column13

Area(cm2) Greatest

diameter (mm)

Distanceto PMband (mm)

Distanceto ALband (mm)

Distanceto PCLcenter (mm)

Distanceto posterior cart.(mm)

Distanceto distalcart. (mm)

W/PM ratio(% area)

W/AL ratio(% area)

W/PCL ratio(% area)

2 D 21.50 5.20 9.33 14.60 13.16 4.48 9.00 39.95 28.75 16.72

3 E 17.93 5.86 9.40 14.98 10.86 5.23 11.64 22.43 47.17 15.20

4 E 24.38 7.21 7.23 11.48 9.23 9.09 10.40 91.35 85.21 44.09

5 E 22.13 7.55 5.91 10.21 8.66 8.72 13.84 55.39 46.14 25.17

6 E 19.60 5.93 9.46 14.53 11.88 5.74 12.70 56.55 51.93 27.07

7 D 16.15 4.75 7.41 13.87 10.34 4.97 4.75 55.54 54.76 27.57

8 D 22.24 5.26 7.52 14.77 11.89 7.27 8.20 77.22 47.30 29.33

9 E 24.07 5.02 11.82 18.63 14.62 6.72 13.28 41.50 26.74 16.26

10 D 21.16 6.44 7.94 11.89 9.74 7.30 7.91 60.32 51.67 27.83

11 D 37.89 8.31 12.26 17.88 15.32 7.19 13.28 73.34 60.25 33.08

12 D 15.84 4.57 6.86 11.10 8.75 6.79 7.50 67.35 62.91 32.53

13 D 18.47 5.85 9.94 12.15 10.57 6.47 7.09 44.68 37.31 20.33

14 D 25.98 7.53 9.56 16.87 13.73 5.19 11.63 75.15 36.19 24.43

15 E 26.37 6.29 11.80 18.49 14.47 4.10 13.75 68.91 63.01 32.91

17 E 12.44 4.96 6.77 12.44 10.14 7.94 10.42 38.67 28.96 16.56

18 E 29.27 8.87 9.51 16.35 13.28 11.58 12.16 51.14 77.62 30.83

19 E 14.93 4.80 12.10 12.23 11.78 6.99 11.18 70.89 34.67 23.28

20 E 13.90 4.60 12.74 19.81 16.48 5.50 12.11 23.97 28.96 13.11

21 D 18.02 4.83 11.47 10.21 9.64 11.29 12.06 64.36 43.95 26.12

22 D 21.58 9.40 7.52 13.89 10.70 5.95 3.50 86.32 89.92 44.04

23 E 13.37 4.67 8.02 15.19 11.60 7.46 8.52 38.20 44.57 20.57

24 E 12.91 3.90 6.67 10.95 8.71 9.12 8.61 19.86 19.27 9.78

Mean 20.46 5.99 9.15 14.18 11.64 7.05 10.16 55.59 48.51 25.31

(5)

416

rev bras ortop.2013;48(5):412–416

respectively, 47.13±19.14 and 40.67±16.19mm2. Thus, the

meanareaoftheWrisbergligament correspondedto23.3%

oftheareaofthePCL,43.41%oftheareaoftheanterolateral

bandand50.3%oftheareaoftheposteromedialband.

AccordingtoTakahashi etal.,16 the meanarea of

inser-tion ofthe Wrisberg(W)ligament was39.4±13.7mm2 and

ofthePCL,122.6±50.1mm2. Themeanarea ofinsertionof

the anterolateral(AL)band was58.0±25.4mm2 and ofthe

posteromedial(PM)band,64.6±24.7mm2.Accordingtothese

authors,theW/PCL,W/ALandW/PMarearatioswere,

respec-tively,32.13%,67.93%and60.99%.

The areas obtained in our study were smaller possibly

becauseinadditiontothelikelysexandethnicity-related

vari-ationsamongthesamplesstudied,weexclusivelydelimited

the bonesitesforfemoralinsertion ofthe ligaments,with

carefuldissection,withoutincludingthefibrousexpansions

thatareinsertedonthe peripheryofthebonesitesforthe

insertions.

Inourstudy, likeinthe study byTakahashi etal.,16 we

foundahighstandarddeviationforthemeanareaofinsertion

oftheWrisbergligamentinthefemur(29.91%and34.77%of

thetotalarea,respectively).Thisprobablydemonstratesthat

therewere considerabledifferencesbetween theindividual

measurementswithinthesample.

Ourstudyhassomelimitations:thenumberofknees

stud-iedmight beconsidered small, giventhe greatanatomical

variationencounteredandalsotheimpossibilityofachieving

three-dimensionalviewingoftheinsertionofthe Wrisberg

ligamentbymeansofadigitalcamera.

Conclusion

Inconclusion,ourfindingssuggestthattheWrisbergligament

isafrequentlyoccurringstructureinkneesandthat,because

itrepresentsanaverageof23.3%oftheareaofinsertionofthe

PCL,itoughttocontributetowardtheposteriorstabilityofthe

knee.

Futurestudiesonselectiveligamentsectioningand

biome-chanicaltestsmaybeabletodeterminewhatthespecificrole

ofthisligamentis,inrelationtoposteriorstabilizationofthe

joint.Meanwhile,everyeffortshouldbemadetoward

preser-vingtheWrisbergligamentinreconstructionsofthePCL.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1.PoytonAR,JavadpourSM,FineganPJ,O’BrienM.The meniscofemoralligamentsoftheknee.JBoneSurgBr. 1997;79:327–30.

2.WanACT,FelleP.Themenisco-femoralligaments.ClinAnat. 1995;8:323–6.

3.ChoJM,SuhJS,NaJB,ChoJH,KimY,YooWK,etal.Variations inmeniscofemoralligamentsatanatomicalstydyandMR imaging.SkeletalRadiol.1999;28:189–95.

4.GupteCM,BullAM,ThomasRD,AmisAA.Areviewofthe functionandbiomechanicsofthemeniscofemoralligaments. Arthroscopy.2003;19:161–71.

5.MatavaMJ,EllisE,GruberB.Surgicaltreatmentofposterior cruciateligamenttears:anevolvingeechnique.JAmAcad OrthopSurg.2009;17:435–46.

6.GupteCM,SmithA,McDermottID,BullAM,ThomasRD, AmisAA.Meniscofemoralligamentsrevisited.Anatomical study,agecorrelation,andclinicalimplications.JBoneJoint SurgBr.2002;84:846–51.

7.ChoS,KoS,WooJK.Meniscus-stabilizingfunctionofthe meniscofemoralligament:experimentalstudyofpigknee joints.Arthroscopy.2006;22:872–7.

8.MoranCJ,PoyntonAR,MoranR,O’BrienM.Analysisof meniscofemoralligamenttensionduringkneemotion. Arthroscopy.2006;22:362–6.

9.HellerL,LangmanJ.Themenisco-femoralligamentsofthe humanknee.JBoneJointSurgBr.1964;46:307–13.

10.LastRJ.Someanatomicaldetailsofthekneejoint.JBoneJoint SurgBr.1948;30:683–8.

11.CandiolloL,GauteroG.Morphologieetfonctiondes

ligamentsménisco-femorauxdel’articulationdegenouchez l’homme.ActaAnat.1959;38:304–23.

12.PoyntonA,MoranCJ,MoranR,O’BrienM.The

meniscofemoralligamentsinfluencelateralmeniscalmotion atthehumankneejoint.Arthroscopy.2011;27:365–71.

13.YamamotoM,HirohataK.Anatomicalstudyonthe meniscofemoralligamentsoftheknee.KobeJMedSci. 1991;37:209–26.

14.KohnD,MorenoB.Meniscusinsertionanatomyasabasisfor meniscusreplacement:amorphologicalcadavericstudy. Arthroscopy.1995;11:96–103.

15.RamosLA,deCarvalhoRT,CohenM,AbdallaRJ.Anatomic relationbetweentheposteriorcruciateligamentandthejoint capsule.Arthroscopy.2008;24:1367–72.

16.TakahashiM,MatsubaraT,DoiM,SuzukiD,NaganoA. Anatomicalstudyofthefemoralandtibialinsertionsofthe anterolateralandposteromedialbundlesofhumanposterior cruciateligament.KneeSurgSportsTraumatolArthrosc. 2006;14:1055–9.

Imagem

Fig. 1 – Deep dissection showing the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), Humphrey meniscofemoral ligament (H), Wrisberg ligament (W) and lateral meniscus (LM).
Fig. 2 – Lateral view of the medial femoral condyle showing the medial intercondylar ridge, the femoral insertions of the Wrisberg ligament (W) and the anterolateral (AL) and posteromedial (PM) bands of the PCL.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

2 - Macroscopic aspect of the tibial insertion areas of the anterolateral (a) and posteromedial (b) bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament in the posterior tibial

1 - Macroscopic appearance of the femoral insertions of the anterolateral bundle (a) and posteromedial bundle (b) of the posterior cruciate ligament, on the lateral face of

2 – Initial radiographic investigation: (A) anteroposterior view of the left foot showing bone fragmentation in the tarsometatarsal region; (B) lateral view showing loss of the

The AMP allows direct view of the ACL femoral insertion site on the medial aspect of the lateral femoral condyle, does not require guides for anatomic femoral tunnel reaming,

RESULTS: The medial patellofemoral ligament was present in 88% of the knees studied, localized transversally between the medial femoral epicondyle and the medial

The author shows that not only is the foreign inscribed in the gaze, a gaze that cannot be reduced to the visible, but that it lies at the very heart of the human subject..

different compartments of the femorotibial joint: medial femo- ral condyle (MFC), lateral femoral condyle (LFC), medial tibial plateau(MTP), lateral tibial plateau (LTP) and

enthesophytes. Extra-patellar lesions included the presence of erosion and subchondral bone exposure in the medial or lateral femoral condyles; the presence