r e v b r a s o r t o p . 2015;50(4):469–471
www.rbo.org.br
Technical
Note
Anatomical
reconstruction
of
the
anterior
cruciate
ligament:
a
logical
approach
Julio
Cesar
Gali
OrthopedicsandTraumatologyService,FaculdadedeCiênciasMédicasedaSaúdedeSorocaba,PontifíciaUniversidadeCatólicadeSão Paulo(PUC-SP),Sorocaba,SP,Brazil
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received4July2014 Accepted8July2014 Availableonline7July2015
Keywords:
Kneetrauma/surgery Anteriorcruciateligament reconstruction
Minimallyinvasivesurgical procedures
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Wedescribethesurgicalapproachthatwehaveusedoverthelastyearsforanteriorcruciate ligament(ACL)reconstruction,highlightingtheimportanceofarthroscopicviewingthrough theanteromedialportal(AMP)andfemoraltunneldrillingthroughanaccessory anterome-dialportal(AMP).TheAMPallowsdirectviewoftheACLfemoralinsertionsiteonthemedial aspectofthelateralfemoralcondyle,doesnotrequireguidesforanatomicfemoraltunnel reaming,preventsanadditionallateralincisioninthedistalthirdofthethigh(aswouldbe unavoidablewhentheoutside-intechniqueisused)andalsocanbeusedfordouble-bundle ACLreconstruction.
©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora Ltda.Allrightsreserved.
Reconstruc¸ão
anatômica
do
ligamento
cruzado
anterior:
uma
abordagem
lógica
Palavras-chave:
Traumatismosdojoelho/cirurgia Reconstruc¸ãodoligamentocruzado anterior
Procedimentoscirúrgicos minimamenteinvasivos
r
e
s
u
m
o
Descrevemosaabordagemcirúrgicaquevimosusandonosúltimosanosparaareconstruc¸ão do ligamento cruzado anterior (LCA) e destacamos a importância da visualizac¸ão artroscópicapeloportalanteromedialeperfurac¸ãodotúnelfemoralporumportal antero-medialacessório,paraqueareconstruc¸ãosejarealmenteanatômica.Essaviapermitea observac¸ãodiretadainserc¸ãofemoraldoLCAnafacemedialdocôndilofemorallateral, nãonecessitadeguiasparaacriac¸ãodotúnelfemoralanatômico,dispensaanecessidade deincisãonoterc¸odistalelateraldacoxa,comoéinevitávelquandoaperfurac¸ãodotúnel femoraléfeitaoutside-in,epermite,também,areconstruc¸ãodoLCAcomduplabanda.
©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditora Ltda.Todososdireitosreservados.
E-mails:juliogali@globo.com,juliogali@note.med.br http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2015.06.014
470
rev bras ortop.2015;50(4):469–471Introduction
Someyearsago,thetechniquemostcommonlyusedfor recons-tructingtheanteriorcruciateligament(ACL)usingagraftfrom theflexortendonswasviathetranstibialroute,withthefemoral tunnelhighintheintercondylararea.1 However,arecentstudy thatincluded436patientswhounderwentprimaryreconstruction oftheACLaloneusinganautologousgraftshowedthatpatients treatedbymeansofthetranstibialtechniquehadasignificantly higherlikelihoodofrequiringrepeatedsurgeryinthesameknee, incomparisonwiththosetreatedbymeansofananteromedial route.2
There is an overall tendency toward reconstructions that are anatomical in nature, since it is known that creation of non-anatomicaltunnelsmaydiminishjointmobility3andcause abnormalrotationofthekneeduringdynamicloading.4
Giventhatmanyauthorscalltheirreconstructionsanatomical, aprecisedefinitionofwhatthismeansisneeded.A reconstruc-tionisanatomicalwhenitseekstofunctionallyrestoretheACL toitsnativedimensions,andtoorientatethecollagenand inser-tionsites,withtheintentionofreproducingthenormalanatomy, restoringthekinematicsandpromotinglong-termjointhealth.5
Forgreateraccuracyincreatinganatomicalfemoraltunnels, drillingthembymeansofanaccessoryanteromedialportalhas been recommended.6 The aim of this technical note was to describeatechniqueforanatomicalreconstructionoftheACL, witharthroscopicviewingthroughtheanteromedialportaland drillingofthefemoraltunnelthroughtheaccessoryanteromedial portal.
Surgical
technique
Wemadeanobliqueincisionofaround4cm,intheproximaland medialthirdofthelowerleg,inordertodiminishthelikelihoodof injurytotheinfrapatellarbranchofthesaphenousnerve.7Then, usinganextractor,weremovedtheflexortendons(gracilisand semitendinosus).
Anassistantatanauxiliarytableremovedtheremainsofthe musclesfromthetendonsandsectionedtheirproximalendso thattheymeasured18cm.Oneoftheendsofeachofthetendons waspassedintotheloopoftheEndobutton®andwassuturedto
itsotherendoveralengthof3cm,usingcomVicryl1.Alsousing Vicryl1,wesuturedthe3cmofthegraftclosesttotheloopofthe Endobutton®toeachotherand,inthesameway,totheothertip,
soastomakeaquadruplegraftof9cminlength.
TwoEthibond5threadswerepassedthroughtheorificesofone sideoftheEndobutton®andtwoEthibond2threadsthroughthe
orificesontheotherside.ThechoiceofEndobutton®loopsizeis
determinedbythelengthofthefemoraltunnel,whichisdescribed below.
The anterolateraland anteromedialportals forarthroscopy wereconstructed adjacenttothelateralandmedialborders of thepatellarligament,respectively.Theanteromedialportalwas openedatthelevel ofthejointinterlineandthe anterolateral portalwascreatedslightlyproximallytothejointinterline.
Diagnosticarthroscopywasperformedinordertotreatany meniscaland/orchondrallesions,ifthesewerepresent.Toview themedialfaceofthelateralfemoralcondyle,wemovedthe opti-caldevicetotheanteromedialportal.
The accessoryanteromedial portalwasestablished using a number18needle,underdirectviewing,inferiorlyandmedially tothestandardanteromedialportal(Fig.1).Itspositioningis crit-icalforobtainingthecorrectpathwayanddeterminingtheentry pointforthefemoraltunnel,soastoavoidinjuringthesurfaceof themedialfemoralcondyleandthemedialmeniscus,duringthe drilling.
AMP
AAMP
Fig.1–Demonstrationoftheanteromedialportal(AMP) (withtheopticaldevice)andaccessoryanteromedialportal (AAMP)(withguidewire).
Abonepick,introducedthroughtheaccessoryanteromedial portal,isusedtodemarcatethecenterofthefemoralinsertionof theACL,atthejunctionoftheinsertionsofitsanteromedialand posterolateralbands,abovethebifurcatedcrest.8
Aguidewireof2mmindiameterwasintroducedthroughthe accessoryanteromedialportalandwasplacedatthelocation pre-viouslymarkedoutbythebonepick.Itwasdrivenintothebone ofthelateralfemoralcondyleforafewmillimeters,bymeansof oneortwohammerblowstoitsextra-articularend.
Followingthis,theguidewirewasintroducedbymeansofa drillingdevice,withtheaimofcrossingthelateralcorticalbone ofthelateralfemoralcondyle.Forthisdrillingoperation,theknee wasflexedat110◦,inordertoprotectthecommonfibularnerve
andsothatthefemoraltunnelcouldhavegreaterlength.9 Acannulateddrillbitof5mmindiameterwasplacedaround theguidewireandwasusedtocreatethefemoraltunnel.Thedrill bitandguidewirewerethenremovedandameasuringdevicewas usedtodeterminethelengthofthefemoraltunnel.Thediameter ofthefemoraltunnelneededtobethesameasthatofthegraft.
Theguidewirewasputbackintotheaccessoryanteromedial portalandwasinsertedintothefemoraltunnel,untilithadgone beyondthecorticalboneofthelateralfemoralcondyle.Adrillbit ofthesamediameterasthegraftshouldbeusedtoincreasethe diameterofthepreexistingtunnel,foralengththatis10mmless thanthetotallengthofthetunnel,sothattheEndobutton®could
beupended.
ThemeasurementoftheEndobutton®loopshouldbenomore
rev bras ortop.2015;50(4):469–471
471
LFC
LFC
A
B
Fig.2–(A)Viewthroughanterolateralportal;(B)view throughanteromedialportal.Thearrowindicatesthe intercondylarcrest.LFC=lateralfemoralcondyle.
thebonetunnelsforuniontooccurbetweentheboneandthe graft.10
Toconstruct thetibialtunnel, weusedadrillingguidethat wasappropriatefortheACL,adjustedtothemarkof55◦.This
wasintroducedtothejointthroughtheanteromedialportal,while theopticaldevicewasintroducedthroughtheanterolateralportal. Theguidewasplacedonthetibiabetweentheanteromedialand posterolateralbands,laterallytothemedialintercondylar tuber-cle,inthesamedirectionasthemiddlepartoftheanteriorrootof thelateralmeniscus.Thediameterofthedrillbitforconstructing thetibialtunnelwasalsothesameasthediameterofthegraft.
AdrillingguidewirewithVicryl1threadplacedinoneofits orificeswaspassedthroughtheaccessoryanteromedialportal,the femoraltunnelandthelateralskinofthethigh,whileadoubleend ofVicryl1waskeptinsidethejoint.
Next,thisendwaspulledintothetibialtunnelwiththeaidof agrasperorprobe,andwasbroughttotheexternalregionofthe lowerleg.
ThegraftwaslashedusingVicryl1andwaspassedthrough thetibialandfemoraltunnels.Followingthis,theEndobuttonwas “upended”,whichprovidedfemoralfixation.Weappliedmanual tensioningtothethreadsofthetibialendofthegraft,withthe kneeflexedat20◦,11andwefixedthegraftinthetibialtunnel
usingametalinterferencescreworabsorbablescrew.
Final
comments
1. Inouropinion,viewingthroughtheanteromedialportal pro-videsa clearviewof themedialfaceofthelateral femoral condyle,withthepossibilityofaclearerviewofthefemoral
Fig.3–(A)Viewthroughanterolateralportal,with guidewireplacedintheanteromedialportal;(B)view throughanteromedialportal,withguidewireplacedinthe accessoryanteromedialportal.
insertionoftheACL,incomparisonwiththeviewobtained throughtheanterolateralportal(Figs.2and3).
2. Thistechniquedoesawaywiththeneedforguides,sincethe insertionoftheACLismarkedoutbythesurgeon,usingabone pick.
3. Thereisnoneedforanadditionalincisioninthedistaland lateralthigh,aswouldoccurwiththeoutside-intechnique. 4. Ifthetunnelsareconstructedthroughtheaccessory
antero-medialportalwithduecare,thisdoesnotcauseanyinjuryto thecartilageofthemedialfemoralcondyle,ortothemedial meniscus.
5. Withthistypeofviewing,itisalsopossibletomake recon-structions usingothergrafts,suchasdouble-band,selective (augmentation)and thosethatpreservethe remaining liga-ment.
Conflicts
of
interest
Theauthordeclaresnoconflictsofinterest.
r
e
f
e
r
e
n
c
e
s
1.WilliamsRJ3rd,HymanJ,PetriglianoF,RozentalT, WickiewiczTL.Anteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction withafour-strandhamstringtendonautograft.JBoneJoint SurgAm.2005;87Suppl.1(Pt1):51–66.
2.DuffeeA,MagnussenRA,PedrozaAD,FlaniganDC,Kaeding CC.TranstibialACLfemoraltunnelpreparationincreases oddsofrepeatipsilateralkneesurgery.JBoneJointSurgAm. 2013;95(22):2035–42.
3.HarnerCD,IrrgangJJ,PaulJ,DearwaterS,FuFH.Lossof motionafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction.AmJ SportsMed.1992;20(5):499–506.
4.TashmanS,CollonD,AndersonK,KolowichP,AnderstW. Abnormalrotationalkneemotionduringrunningafter anteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction.AmJSportsMed. 2004;32(4):975–83.
5.VanEckCF,LesniakBP,SchreiberVM,FuFH.Anatomic single-anddouble-bundleanteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction flowchart.Arthroscopy.2010;26(2):258–68.
6.FuFH,ShenW,StarmanJS,OkekeN,IrrgangJJ.Primary anatomicdouble-bundleanteriorcruciateligament reconstruction:apreliminary2-yearprospectivestudy.AmJ SportsMed.2008;36(7):1263–74.
7.SabatD,KumarV.Nerveinjuryduringhamstringgraft harvest:aprospectivecomparativestudyofthreedifferent incisions.KneeSurgSportsTraumatolArthrosc.
2013;21(9):2089–95.
8.FerrettiM,EkdahlM,ShenW,FuFH.Osseouslandmarksof thefemoralattachmentoftheanteriorcruciateligament:an anatomicstudy.Arthroscopy.2007;23(11):1218–25.
9.GaliJC,OliveiraHC,CiâncioBA,PalmaMV,KobayashiR, CaetanoEB.Ocomprimentodostúneisfemoraisvaria comaflexãodojoelhonareconstruc¸ãoanatômicado ligamentocruzadoanterior.RevBrasOrtop.2012;47(2):246–50.
10.ZantopT,FerrettiM,BellKM,BruckerPU,GilbertsonL, FuFH.Effectoftunnel-graftlengthonthebiomechanics ofanteriorcruciateligament-reconstructedknees: intra-articularstudyinagoatmodel.AmJSportsMed. 2008;(36):2158–66.