• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Bryophyte diversity in an area of Brazilian Cerrado in Central-West

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Bryophyte diversity in an area of Brazilian Cerrado in Central-West"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texto

(1)

Abstract

The Cerrado is a savanna formation predominantly located in the central Brazilian plateau; this vegetation is rich in bryophytes. This study analyzes bryophyte diversity, composition and distribution among various Cerrado vegetation types (Gallery Forest, Deciduous For-est, Rupestrian Cerrado and Rupestrian Fields) and substrates in the Área de Proteção Ambiental Morro do Macaco, from municipality of Iporá, Goiás state, in Central-West Bra-zil. The collection was performed in four plots of 20m x 20m, in each vegetation types, from August to December 2010, the data were analyzed with the Shannon-Wiener (H’) and Simpson diversity index and the floristic similarity with UPGMA. We found 37 species, with 28 to Bryophyta and nine to Marchantiophyta. Trichostomum brachydontium Bruch is a new record to the Brazilian Midwest and an endemic species (Archidium oblongifolium Peralta et al.) occurs in the study area. The forested areas were the richest in species number and the substrate most colonized was soil. The results extend the information about the Cerrado bryophytes, increasing the knowledge of their taxonomic diversity and ecology.

Keywords: mosses, liverworts, community ecology, Brazilian savanna.

Resumo

O Cerrado é uma formação savânica localizada no platô Central do Brazil, apresentando vegetação rica em briófitas. Este trabalho analisou a diversidade de briófitas através da composição e distribuição de briófitas entre as fitofisionomias de Cerrado (Mata Seca, Mata de Galeria, Cerrado Rupestre e Campo Rupestre) e a colonização de substratos na Área de Proteção Ambiental Morro do Macaco, no município de Iporá, no Estado de Goiás, na região Central do Brasil. As coletas ocorreram no interior de quatro parcelas de 20m x 20m demarcadas em cada formação vegetal nos meses de agosto a dezembro de 2010. Foram analisados os índices de Shannon-Wiener (H’) e Simpson e a similaridade entre as fitofisionomias através da técnica UPGMA. Foram encontradas 37 espécies, 28 da divisão Bryophyta e nove de Marchantiophyta. Trichostomum brachydontium Bruch é registrada pela primeira vez para o Centro-Oeste brasileiro e uma espécie endêmica, Archidium oblongifolium Peralta et al., ocorre na área estudada. As áreas florestadas apresentaram maior riqueza de espécies e o substrato mais colonizado foi solo. Os re-sultados obtidos ampliam as informações sobre a diversidade taxonômica e ecologia das briófitas do Cerrado.

Palavras-chave: musgos, hepáticas, ecologia de comunidades, savana brasileira.

Bryophyte diversity in an area of Brazilian Cerrado

in Central-West

Briófitas de área de Cerrado da região Centro-Oeste do Brasil

1 Universidade Estadual de Goiás. Campus Iporá. Av. R2,

Quadra 01, s/n, Jardim Novo Horizonte II, 76200-000, Iporá, GO, Brasil.

2 Instituto de Botânica. Av. Miguel Stéfano, 3687,

04301-012, São Paulo, SP, Brasil.

Alex Batista Moreira Rios

1 alexrios_ipo@yahoo.com.br

Jhonatan Paulo da

Silva Oliveira

1 jhonatan.biosilva@yahoo.com.br

Rodrigo Pereira da Silva

1 rodrigo.bio1@hotmail.com

José Firmino de Oliveira Neto

1 neto.09@hotmail.com

Luciana Santos Oliveira

1 lucianasantos.o.bio@hotmail.com

Denilson Fernandes Peralta

2 denilsonfp@yahoo.com.br

Douglas Henrique Bottura

Maccagnan

1

(2)

Introduction

The Neotropical region is extremely rich in bryophytes,

congregating around a third of the known species, which

are distributed in the various ecosystems that exist from

Mexico to southeastern Brazil (Hallingbäck and Hodgetts,

2000). However, the actual knowledge about the

composi-tion, structure, distribution and ecology of this group of

plant remains incipient or unknown to several Latin

Amer-ican areas, including the Brazilian Cerrado vegetation

do-main (Câmara and Vital, 2006; Câmara, 2008a).

The Cerrado is a savanna formation predominantly

lo-cated in the central Brazilian plateau. This vegetation is rich

in bryophytes and 433 species have already been recorded

for this region, but comparing its area and the number of

works published with the others Brazilian vegetations, it

re-mains as one of the lesser knowledge about the Bryophyte

species diversity (Câmara and Vital, 2004, 2006; Câmara

and Costa, 2006; Câmara, 2008a; Forzza et al., 2010).

In the last decades the Cerrado vegetation has been reduced

to non-continuous fragments with loss of native species

(Machado et al., 2004; Pivello, 2005; Mittermeier et al.,

2005), and concerning about the bryophyte diversity, the

little knowledge is an impediment for conservation actions

and management of their diversity (Santos, 2006).

The Goiás State is totally included in the Cerrado

do-main But few works were developed in this state and there

is 318 bryophyte species recorded. This information comes

from taxonomical works, such as Gradstein et al. (2005);

Yano and Peralta (2007, 2008); Peralta et al. (2008); Sousa

et al. (2008, 2010); Soares et al. (2011); Pinheiro et al.

(2012); Carvalho et al. (2014); Aquino et al. (2015);

Peral-ta et al. (2015); and CosPeral-ta and PeralPeral-ta (2015).

Considering the degradation level of the savannahs by

human action (Myers et al., 2000; Machado et al., 2004)

and the need of information about the Cerrado bryophytes,

this study aimed to survey the bryophytes in the Área de

Proteção Ambiental Morro do Macaco, in the Municipality

of Iporá, state of Goiás, analyzing their diversity,

composi-tion and distribucomposi-tion between various Cerrado vegetacomposi-tion

types and substrates in the area studied.

Material and methods

Study area

The Área de Proteção Ambiental (APA) Morro do

Macaco (16°25’212”S and 51°02’455’W) has an average

area of 1,000 ha (Gomis, 1998); the altitude ranges from

400 to 800 m.s.l. and belongs to the municipality of Iporá,

the largest city in this state (IBGE, 2010). The

municipal-ity’s climate type is tropical semi-humid (Alves, 2011), with

dry and rainy seasons well defined, where the annual

rain-fall are 1,200 to 1,600 mm (Longhi et al., 2005). The rainrain-fall

season is concentrated during the months of November and

March, with 100 and 300 mm of month mean, this period

also recorded the highest temperatures means above 30°C

(SECTEC/SIMEHGO, 2011). The soils are of the Oxisol

and Red-Yellow with medium texture; the topography is

un-dulating and the vegetation composed by remnants of native

Cerrado (Longhi et al., 2005; Cunha et al., 2007).

The vegetation of the studied area is composed mainly

of Gallery Forest, Deciduous Forest, Rupestrian Cerrado

and Rupestrian Fields, with the forest formations

concen-trated at the base and tip of the hill. This area was chosen

for this survey because after observing the field we

consid-ered it a very preserved remnant, because the soil is hardly

rock and hence very difficult for agriculture and farming.

The Area is a conservation unit of Sustainable Use

(Brasil, 2006) named APA (Environmental Protect Area,

in Portuguese “Área de Proteção Ambiental”) and

estab-lished by the law no. 871, of June 23, 1997 (Iporá, 1997).

Methods

Samples were collected from August to December of

2010 in the following vegetation types: Gallery Forest,

Deciduous Forest, Rupestrian Cerrado and Rupestrian

Fields, in all average substrates. In order to analyze the

composition and distribution of bryophytes in each

vegeta-tion type we collected 16 plots, four plots of 20m x 20m

(400m²) for each vegetation type, with minimum distance

of 100m between them. We used the collection

methodolo-gy for this group described by Wiggers and Stange (2008).

The samples are deposited in the herbaria SP (Herbarium

SP – “Maria Eneyda P. Kauffman Fidalgo) and UEG

(Her-barium UEG – Universidade Estadual de Goiás).

The identifications were done based on Jovet-Ast

(1991), Sharp et al. (1994), Buck (1998), Gradstein and

Costa (2003), Bordin and Yano (2013), as well as the

clas-sification system by Goffinet et al. (2009) for the

Bryo-phyta and Crandall-Stotler et al. (2009) for

Marchantio-phyta. The samples were also classified according to the

substrate from which they were extracted, as follows: soil,

bark, litter, and rock, according Robins (1952).

Diversity analyzes of Shannon-Wiener (H’) and

Simp-son indexes was calculated with the Statistica 7.0 software.

The UPGMA cluster analysis among the vegetation types

was calculated using the usind the presence/absence of the

species. The distances were calculated by Pearson index

(Legendre and Legendre, 1998).

(3)

Results and discussion

348 samples and found 37 bryophyte species (Table 1),

with 28 species of Bryophyta in 20 genera and 16 families

were analyzed. The most represented families are

Fissi-dentaceae (seven species) and Pottiaceae (four species).

The samples were collected during the end of the dry

sea-son and the beginning of the rainy seasea-son, factors that

in-fluenced the low occurrence of sporophytes, as described

by Castro et al. (2002).

Trichostomum brachydontium Bruch.(Pottiaceae) is

described in the literature as occurring from Mexico to

Brazil (Sharp et al., 1994), but in Brazil it is recorded only

to the Northeast and Southeast (Forzza et al., 2010). This

new record is an important fill of the gap in the Mid-West,

and encourages the development of new researches in this

region, as commented by Câmara and Vital (2004).

The samples collected for this survey were used to

describe Archidium oblongifolium Peralta et al.

(Archi-diaceae, subg. Archidiella). This species is recognized as

Taxa GF DF RC RF SO BA RO LI Voucher

Pseudosymblepharis schimperiana (Paris) H.A.Crum 3 22 56 19 100 - - - Cunha 7

Helicophyllum torquatum (Hook.) Brid. 14 86 - - - 36 57 7 Silva 21

Entodontopsis leucostega (Brid.) W.R.Buck & Ireland 16 69 13 2 14 32 26 28 Rios 32

Fissidens goyazensis Broth. 17 50 33 - 100 - - - Rios 153

Archilejeunea parviflora (Nees) Schiffn. 20 80 - - - 70 20 10 Silva 23

Hyophilla involuta (Hook.) A.Jaeger 25 75 - - - 25 75 - Rios 77

Eulacophyllum cultelliforme (Sull.) W.R.Buck & Ireland 95 - 5 - 42 5 53 - Oliveira-Neto 34

Fissidens pallidinervis Mitt. 100 - - - 66 17 - 17 Rios 157

Cyathodium cavernarum Kunze 100 - - - 67 - 33 - Rios 148

Fissidens angustifolius Sull. 100 - - - 100 - - - Rios 149

Fissidens flaccidus Mitt. 100 - - - 100 - - - Rios 160

Fissidens lindbergii Mitt. 100 - - - 100 - - - Rios 150

Fissidens zollingeri Mont. 100 - - - 100 - - - Nascimento 6

Fabronia macroblepharis Schwägr. 100 - - - - 100 - - Rios 115

Fissidens pellucidus Hornsch. 100 - - - 100 - Rios 161

Macromitrium carionis Müll. Hal. 100 - - - 100 - Rios 68

Frullania gibbosa Nees - 60 40 - 40 20 40 - Rios 38

Frullania dusenii Steph. - 89 11 - - 56 22 22 Rios 30

Acrolejeunea emergens (Mitt.) Steph. - 100 - - - 40 40 20 Rios 52

Erpodium coronatum (Hook. & Wilson) Mitt. - 100 - - - 50 - 50 J.Oliveira 35

Fabronia ciliaris (Brid.) Brid. - 100 - - - 100 - - Silva 15

Ochrobryum subulatum Hampe - 100 - - - 100 - - Rios 39

Octoblepharum albidum Hedw. - 100 - - - 100 - - Rios 39

Acrolejeunea torulosa (Lehm. & Lindenb.) Schiffn. - 100 - - - - 100 - Silva 17

Trichostomum brachydontium Bruch - - 12 88 100 - - - Rios 93

Archidium oblongifolium Peralta et al. - - 25 75 100 - - - Rios 110

Weissia controversa Hedw. - - 33 67 100 - - - Rios 101

Riccia wainionis Steph. - - 50 50 100 - - - L.Oliveira 36

Erythrodontium longisetum (Hook.) Paris - - 100 - - 100 - - Rios 3

Archidium ohioense Schimp. ex Müll. Hal. - - - 100 100 - - - Rios 20

Bryum apiculatum Schwägr. - - - 100 100 - - - Rios 83

Chryso-hypnum diminutivum (Hampe) W.R.Buck * - - - Rios 37

Lopholejeunea nigricans (Lindenb.) Schiffn * - - - Rios 34

Mastigolejeunea auriculata (Wilson) Schiffn. * - - - Rios 77

Ochrobryum gardneri (Müll.Hal.) Lindb. * - - - Rios 35

Tisserantiella minutissima (Mitt.) R.H.Zander* - - - Rios 49

Trachyphyllum dusenii (Müll.Hal. ex Broth.) Broth. * - - - Silva 25

Table 1. Species list and distribution with relative frequency (%) by vegetation types and substrates in the APA Morro do Macaco, Iporá

(4)

endemic of the rupestrian Cerrado and Rupestrian Fields

of the APA Morro do Macaco (Peralta et al., 2015).

Entodontopsis leucostega (Brid.) W.R. Buck &

Ire-land (Stereophyllaceae) was the most frequent species,

with occurrence in 163 (47%) of the samples analyzed.

This moss has wide Neotropical range and is commonly

recorded in the works performed in the Cerrado by Sharp

et al. (1994); Câmara and Leite (2005); Carvalho et al.

(2014); and Aquino et al. (2015).

For the liverworts we found nine species in seven

gen-era and four families. The Lejeuneaceae was the richest

family, with five species, followed by Frullaniaceae, with

two species. Similarly, in other inventories in Neotropical

areas, Lejeunaceae has been recorded as the richest family

of liverworts and sometimes has nearly more than 50% of

the liverworts species, as listed by Peralta and Yano (2005)

for a swamp area in the Cerrado region; and Valente and

Pôrto (2006) and Campelo and Pôrto (2007) for remnants

of Atlantic Forest.

Vilas Bôas-Bastos and Bastos (1998) related the great

occurrence of leaf liverworts, such as Lejeuneaceae and

Frullaniaceae, with xerophytic condition that allow the

development of species of large ecological amplitude

tol-erant of solar radiation exposition. Similar results were

found in the APA Morro do Macaco.

The species recorded comprise 8% of the bryophyte

species recorded to the Cerrado region and 13% of the

Goiás State (Costa and Peralta, 2015).

Localities Species number Common species with APA

Municipality of Alagoinhas, BA (Vilas Bôas-Bastos e Bastos, 1998). 27 4

Jalapão, TO (Câmara e Leite, 2005). 22 4

Parque Estadual da Serra dos Pireneus and proximitys, GO (Sousa et al., 2008). 58 3

Reserva do IBGE, RECOR, DF (Câmara, 2008a). 26 5

Reserva do IBGE, RECOR, DF (Câmara, 2008b). 15 1

Parque Estadual da Serra dos Pireneus, GO (Sousa et al., 2010). 68 10

Parque Nacional de Brasília, DF (Soares et al., 2011) 55 6

Parque Nacional das Chapadas dos Veadeiros, GO (Pinheiro et al., 2012) 36 1

Serra de Caldas Novas, GO (Carvalho et al., 2014). 36

7

Municipality of Quirinópolis, GO (Aquino et al., 2015). 38

6

Table 2. Comparison among the floristic list of APA Morro do Macaco (37 species), Iporá municipality, Goiás, Central-western Brazil and

the published data of Cerrado vegetation works.

Figure 1. Bryophyte species by vegetation types in APA Morro do Macaco, Iporá municipality, Goiás, Central-western Brazil. Black: total

(5)

For richness comparation we discharge the sampling

effort, once the work published used for comparation

do not describe in details the collection methods. The

works performed in the Cerrado region developed by

Vilas Bôas-Bastos and Bastos (1998) recorded 23

spe-cies; Câmara and Leite, with 22 species (2005); Sousa

et al. (2008), with 58 species; Câmara (2008a) with 26

species; Câmara (2008b), with 15 species; Sousa et al.

(2010), with 68 species; Soares et al. (2011), with 55

spe-cies; Pinheiro et al. (2012), with 36 spespe-cies; Carvalho

et al. (2014), with 36 species and, Aquino et al. (2015),

with 38 species. According to Pinheiro et al. (2012) and

Peralta et al. (2015), the micro-habitat heterogeneity

pro-vide specific conditions of soil texture and composition

and humidity essential for the establishment of the

bryo-phytes, and the existent conditions in the APA, including

forested areas and gross rock, constitute a wide gradient

for bryophytes.

The Gallery Forest was the vegetation type with the

highest species richness (S=16, nine of them exclusive),

followed by dry forest (S=14, six exclusive), Rupestrian

Cerrado (S=11 species) and Rupestrian Field (S=8, two

exclusive) (Table 2, Figure 1). The highest diversity

indi-ces were found in the Gallery Forest and Dry Forest, while

the highest values for the Simpson index were obtained for

the formations Rupestrian Cerrado and Rupestrian Field

(Table 3). These results follow the discussion provided by

Vilas Bôas-Bastos and Bastos (1998); Sousa et al. (2010);

and Aquino et al. (2015) relating the forested areas with

greater water availability and few dry exposed areas.

Our cluster analyses of the bryophyte distribution

among the vegetation types found in APA Morro do

Maca-co show three groups: (i) Dry Forest and Rupestrian

Cer-rado, (ii) Gallery Forest, (iii) Rupestrian Field (Figure 2).

The Rupestrian Cerrado compared to Rupestrian Field

of-fers greater variety of habitats, especially the occurrence

of trunks, for colonization by mosses and liverworts, a

fac-tor that probably makes this vegetation type closer to Dry

Forest. Visnadi (2004) found differences between species

composition in grassland and savanna formations in the

Reserva Biológica e Estação Experimental Mogi-Guaçu,

in São Paulo state.

Considering only the mosses, the cluster topology of

the vegetation types did not change the distribution pattern

(Figure 3). However, to the liverworts, the topology has

changed (Figure 4) for only two groups: (i) Forest

tions of Gallery and Dry Forest; and (ii) Rupestrian

forma-Vegetation types H’ D

Gallery Forest 2.328 0.139

Dry Forest 2.005 0.220

Rupestrian Cerrado 1.740 0.276

Rupestrian Field 1.436 0.356

Table 3. Shannon-Wiener (H’) and Simpson (D) index from four

vegetation types in APA Morro do Macaco (November – Dezember 2010), Iporá municipality, Goiás, Central-western Brazil.

Figure 2. Vegetation types cluster by Pearson index and UPGMA, including all species found in APA Morro do Macaco, Iporá municipality,

(6)

tions of Cerrado and Field. Santos et al. (2011) described

the distribution of the bryophytes in forested areas of

At-lantic Forest vegetation types as related to the stable

micro-climate that differ from the open vegetation. Carvalho et

al. (2014) described the open vegetation as a barrier of dry

intolerant species, similarly to our observations in the APA,

because in the greatest elevations the Rupestrian is not

colonized by the forest species, even with a small distance.

The cluster analysis indicate that Bryophyta is better

than Marchantiophytae to group the forested areas of

Gal-Figure 3. Vegetation type cluster by Pearson index and UPGMA, including only mosses found in APA Morro do Macaco, Iporá

municipal-ity, Goiás, Central-western Brazil.

Figure 4. Vegetation type cluster by Pearson index and UPGMA, including only liverworts found in APA Morro do Macaco, Iporá

(7)

lery Forest with Deciduous Forest and the open exposed

areas of Rupestrian Cerrado with Rupestrian Fields,

con-trasting with the results of Visnadi (2004), in the Cerrado of

Mogi Guaçu, in which liverworts is a group that established

greater similarity between the vegetation types studied.

The colonization of the substrate predominance are in

the following ascending order: soil (17 species); rocky

sur-faces (12 species), and bark (15 species) (Table 2, Figure 5).

The occurrence on soil and rock of 65% of the species

in the APA characterizes the area as stable and indicates

specialization in the substrate colonization. These results

differ from other studies in the country, in which the most

colonized substrate was bark (Molinaro and Costa, 2001;

Ilkiu-Borges et al., 2004; Valente et al., 2009). In an

evalu-ation of the all species of the Cerrado, Costa and Peralta

(2015) also describe bark and soil as the most common

substrates colonized. According to Santos et al. (2011) and

Carvalho et al. (2014), the vegetation acts as filters on the

expansion of the communities on the ecosystems.

Our results indicate that the APA Morro do Macaco is

an important remnant of Cerrado for bryophytes, since 37

species were found, with one new citation to the Mid-West

region and an endemic species. The forested areas were

the richest in species number and the substrate most

colo-nized was soil.

Considering the degradation process of the Cerrado

vegetation, our results encourage new surveys in this

eco-system in order to fill distribution gaps and ecological

characterization of the communities, as well as to

contrib-ute for future APA conservation acts.

References

ALVES, E.D.L. 2011. Frequência e probabilidade de chuvas no mu-nicípio de Iporá-GO. Caminhos de geografia. Available at: http://www. ig.ufu.br/revista/caminhos.html. Accessed on: 17/08/2011.

AQUINO, H.F.; RESENDE, I.L.M.; PERALTA, D.F.; ROCHA, L.M. 2015. Bryoflora of Gallery Forest in Quirinópolis, Goiás State, Brazil. Hoehnea, 42(3):419-424. https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-8906-43/2014

BORDIN, J; YANO, O. 2013. Fissidentaceae (Bryophyta) do Brasil. Bo-letim do Instituto de Botânica, 22:1-72.

BRASIL. 2006. Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Na-tureza. Lei N° 9.985, de 8 de julho de 2000. Decreto N° 4.340, de 22 de agosto de 2002. 6 ed. Com alterações introduzidas pela lei N° 11.132 de 4 de julho de 2006 e pelo decreto N° 5.566, de outubro de 2005. Brasília. BUCK, W.R. 1998. Pleurocarpous Mosses of the West Indies. Memoirs of The New York Botanical Garden, 400 p.

CÂMARA, P.E.A.S. 2008a. Musgos pleurocárpicos das matas de galeria da Reserva Ecológica do IBGE, RECOR, Distrito Federal, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 22(4):1027-1035.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062008000400013

CÂMARA, P.E.A.S. 2008b. Musgos pleurocárpicos das matas de galeria da Reserva Ecológica do IBGE, RECOR, Distrito Federal, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 22(2):573-581.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062008000200024

CÂMARA, P.E.A.S.; COSTA, D.P. 2006. Hepáticas e antóceros das ma-tas de galeria da Reserva Ecológica do IBGE, RECOR, Distrito Federal, Brasil. Hoehnea, 33(1):41-49.

CÂMARA, P.E.A.S.; LEITE, R.N. 2005. Bryophytes from Jalapão, state of Tocantins, northern Brazil. Tropical Bryology, 26:23-29.

CÂMARA, P.E.A.S.; VITAL, D.M. 2004. Briófitas do Município de Poconé, Pantanal de Mato Grosso, MT, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica,

18(4):881-886. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062004000400019

CÂMARA, P.E.A.S.; VITAL, D.M. 2006. Briófitos de Cáceres, Pantanal de Matogrosso, Brasil, com nuevos registros para el estado y el País. Tropical Bryology, 27:1-8.

Figure 5. Species number by substrates in APA Morro do Macaco Iporá municipality, Goiás, Central-western Brazil. Black: total species

(8)

CAMPELO, M.J.A.; PÔRTO, K.C. 2007. Brioflora epífita e epífila da RPPN Frei Caneca, Jaqueira, PE, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica,

21(1):185-192. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062007000100017

CARVALHO, M.A.S.; XAVIER-SANTOS, S.; GUILHERME, F.A.G. 2014. Edge effects on epiphytic moss (Bryophyta) communities in a sa-vanna area in central Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Ecology, 1:17-28.

CASTRO, N.M.C.F.; PÔRTO, K.C.; YANO, O.; CASTRO, A.A.J.F. 2002. Levantamento florístico de Bryopsida de Cerrado e mata ripícula do Parque Nacional de Sete Cidades, Piauí, Brasil. Acta Botanica Bra-silica, 16(1):61-76. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062002000100008

CRANDALL-STOTLER, B.; STOTLER, R.E.; LONG, D.G. 2009. Mor-phology and classification of the Marchantiophyta. In: B. GOFFINET; A.J. SHAW, Bryophyte Biology. 2nd ed., New York, Cambridge Univer-sity Press, p. 1-54.

COSTA, D.P.; PERALTA, D.F. 2015. Bryophytes diversity in Brazil. Rodriguésia, 66(4):1063-1071.

https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-7860201566409

CUNHA, H.F.; VALE, M.S.; SILVA JUNIOR, C.A.; CAMPOS, R.F.; CARLOS, L.O. 2007. Conhecimento empírico dos moradores da comu-nidade do entorno do Parque Municipal da Cachoeirinha (Iporá-Goiás). Acta Scientiarum Biological Sciences, 29(2):203-212.

https://doi.org/10.4025/actascibiolsci.v29i2.589

FORZZA, R.C.; LEITMAN, P.M.; COSTA, A.F.; CARVALHO JR., A.A.; PEIXOTO, A.L.; WALTER, B.M.T.; BICUDO, C.; ZAPPI, D.; COSTA, D.P.; LLERAS, E.; MARTINELLI, G.; LIMA, H.C.; PRADO, J.; STEHMANN, J.R.; BAUMGRATZ, J.F.A.; PIRANI, J.R.; SYLVESTRE, L.; MAIA, L.C.; LOHMANN, L.G.; QUEIROZ, L.P.; SILVEIRA, M.; COELHO, M.N.; MAMEDE, M.C.; BASTOS, M.N.C.; MORIM, M.P.; BARBOSA, M.; MENEZES, M.; HOPKINS, M.; SECCO, R.; CAVALCANTI, T.B.; SOUZA, V.C. (org.). 2010. Catálogo de plantas e fungos do Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, Andrea Ja-kobsson Estúdio, Instituto de Pesquisas Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro, 2 volumes.

GOFFINET, B.; BUCK, W.R.; SHAW, A.J. 2009. Morphology, anatomy and classification of the Bryophyta. In: B. GOFFINET; A.J. SHAW, Bryophyte Biology. 2nd ed., New York, Cambridge University Press, p. 55-138.

GOMIS, M.A. 1998. Uma viagem no tempo de Pilões a Iporá (1748 –

1998), dois séculos e meio de história da colonização e desenvolvimento do oeste goiano. Iporá: Editora Nova Página, 295 p.

GRADSTEIN, S.R.; COSTA, D.P. 2003. The Hepaticae and Antocerotae of Brazil. New York: Memoirs of the New Botanical Garden, vol. 87, 318 p.

GRADSTEIN, S.R; SCHÄFER-VERWIMP, A.; COSTA, D.P. 2005. The liverworts (Marchantiophyta) of the State of Goiás, Brazil. Revista de Biologia Neotropical, 2(2):75-108.

HALLINGBÄCK, T.; HODGETTS, N. (Compilers). 2000. Mosses, Liv-erworts, and Hornworts. Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan for Bryophytes. IUCN/SSC Bryophyte Specialist Group. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, 106 p.

IBGE. 2010. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Cen-so de 2010. Available at: http://cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/perfil. php?codmun=521020. Accessed on: 11/01/2011.

ILKIU-BORGES, A.L.; TAVARES, A.C.C.; LISBOA, R.C.L. 2004. Briófitas da Ilha de Germoplasma, reservatório de Tucuruí, Pará, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 18(3):689-692.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062004000300026

IPORÁ. 1997. Decreto-lei n° 871, de 23 de junho de 1997. Declara Área de Proteção Ambiental no âmbito do município de Iporá-GO, o Morro do Macaco e dá outras providências.

JOVE-AST, S. 1991. Riccia (Hepátiques, Marchantiales) d’Ámerique Latine, taxons du sous-genre Riccia. Cryptogamie, Bryologie et Liché-nologie, 12:189-370.

LEGENDRE, P.; LEGENDRE, L. 1998. Numerical Ecology: Develop-ments in Environmental Modelling 20. Amsterdam, Elsevier, 853 p.

LONGHI, E.H.; OLIVEIRA, E.; VANDERLEI, J.C.; ROCHA, E.V.; SILVA, I.D.C. 2005. Arranjo extrativista do pequi (Caryocar brasiliense Camb.) na região de Iporá, Goiás: sustentabilidade e dinâmica da comer-cialização. In: Anais do Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, XLIII, Ribeirão Preto, p. 157.

MACHADO, R.B.; RAMOS NETO, M.B.; PEREIRA, P.G.P.; CALDAS, E.F.; GONÇALVES, D.A.; SANTOS, N.S.; TABOR, K.; STEININGER, M. 2004. Estimativas de perda da área do Cerrado brasileiro. Brasília, Conservação Internacional, 23 p.

MITTERMEIER, R.A.; GIL, P. R.; HOFFMAN, M.; PILGRIM, J.; BROOKS, T.; MITTERMEIER, C. G.; LAMOREUX, J.; FONSECA, G. A. B. 2005. Hotspots Revisited: Earth’s Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Terrestrial Ecoregions. Mexico City, CEMEX, 392 p. MOLINARO, L.C.; COSTA, D.P. 2001. Briófitas do arboreto do Jardim Botânico do Rio de Janeiro. Rodriguésia, 52(81):107-124.

MYERS, N.; MITTERMEIER, R.A.; MITTEMERMEIER, C.G.; FON-SECA, G.A.B.; KENT, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403: 853-858.

https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501

PERALTA, D.F.; BORDIN, J.; YANO, O. 2008. New mosses records (Bryophyta) for Goiás and Tocantins states, Brazil. Acta Botanica Bra-silica, 22(3):834-844.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062008000300019

PERALTA, D.F.; YANO, O. 2005. Briófitas de mata paludosa, município de Zacarias, noroeste do Estado de São Paulo, Brasil. Acta Botanica Bra-silica, 19(4):963-977.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062005000400030

PERALTA, D.F.; RIOS, A.B.M.; GOFFINET, B. 2015. Archidium ob-longifolium (Archidiaceae, subg. Archidiella), a new species from Brazil. Cryptogamie, Bryologie, 36(3):211-215.

https://doi.org/10.7872/cryb/v36.iss3.2015.211

PIVELLO, V.R. 2005. Manejo de fragmentos de Cerrado: princípios para a conservação da biodiversidade. In: A. SCARIOT; J.C. SOUSA-SILVA; J.M. FELFILI, Cerrado: Ecologia, Biodiversidade e Conservação. Bra-sília, Ministério do Meio Ambiente, 439 p.

PINHEIRO, E.M.L.; FARIA, A.L.A.; CÂMARA, P.E.A.S. 2012. Riqueza de espécies e diversidade de marchantiophyta (hepáticas) de capões de mata, no Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Veadeiros, Goiás, Brasil. Revista de Biologia Neotropical, 9(1):19-27.

ROBBINS, R.G. 1952. Bryophyte ecology of a dune area in New Zea-land. Vegetatio, Acta Geobotanica, 4:1-31.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00452923

SANTOS, A.J. 2006. Estimativas de riqueza em espécies. In: L. CUL-LEN JÚNIOR; R. RUDRAN; C. VALLADARES-PADUA (orgs.), Mé-todos de estudos em biologia da conservação e manejo da vida silvestre. Curitiba: Universidade Federal do Paraná, p. 19-41.

SANTOS, N.D.; COSTA, D.P.; KINOSHITA, L.S.; SHEPHERD. 2011. Aspectos brioflorísticos e fitogeográficos de duas formações costeiras de Floresta Atlântica da Serra do Mar, Ubatuba/SP, Brasil. Biota Neotropica,

11(2):425-438. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-06032011000200040

SECTEC/SIMEHGO. 2011. Sistema de Metereologia e Hidrologia de Estado de Goiás. Available at: http://www.simego.sectec.go.gov.br/. Ac-cessed on: 10/01/2011.

SHARP, A.J.; CRUM, H.; ECKEL, P.M. 1994. The Moss flora of Mexi-co. Memoirs of the New York: Botanical Garden, 69:1-1113.

SOARES, A.E.R.; CÂMARA, P.E.A.S.; PERALTA, D.F. 2011. Mosses off gallery forests from Brasilia National Park, Federal District, Brazil. Boletim do Instituto de Botânica, 21:185-192.

SOUSA, M.A.R.; GOMES-KLEIN, V.L.; YANO, O. 2010. Musgos (Bry-ophyta) do Parque Estadual da Serra dos Pireneus, Goiás, Brasil. Revista de Biologia Neotropical, 7(1):7-26.

(9)

VALENTE, E.B.; PÔRTO, K.C. 2006. Hepáticas (Marchantiophyta) de um fragmento de Mata Atlântica na Serra da Jibóia, Município de Santa Teresinha, BA, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 20(2):433-441.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062006000200018

VALENTE, E.B.; PÔRTO, K.C.; BÔAS-BASTOS, S.B.V.; BASTOS, C.J.P. 2009. Musgos (Bryophyta) de um fragmento de Mata Atlântica na Serra da Jibóia, município de Santa Terezinha, BA, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 23(2):369-375.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062009000200008

VILAS BÔAS-BASTOS, S.B.; BASTOS, C.J.P. 1998. Briófitas de uma área de Cerrado no município de Alagoinhas, Bahia, Brasil. Tropical Bry-ology, 15:101-110.

VISNADI, S.R. 2004. Distribuição da brioflora em diferentes fisiono-mias de cerrado da Reserva Biológica e Estação Experimental de Mogi-Guaçu, SP, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 18(4):965-973.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-33062004000400026

WIGGERS, I.; STANGE, C.E.B. 2008. Manual de instruções para co-leta, identificação e herborização de material botânico. Programa de Desenvolvimento Educacional – SEED – PR. UNICENTRO, 44 p. YANO, O.; PERALTA, D.F. 2007. Musgos (Bryophyta). In: J.A. RIZZO (coord.), Flora dos Estados de Goiás e Tocantins. Goiânia, Criptógamos, vol. 6, 333 p.

YANO, O.; PERALTA, D.F. 2008. Antóceros (Anthocerotophyta) e Hepáticas (Marchantiophyta). In: J.A. RIZZO (coord.), Flora dos Esta-dos de Goiás e Tocantins. Criptógamos, vol. 7, 277 p.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The results showed the following: the companies classified as the best where to work in Portugal have a utilization rate of performance evaluation systems that enhance

Our results showed that changes in bacterial, archaeal, and fungal community structures in cerrado denso , cerrado sensu stricto , campo sujo , and gallery forest soils

biomes within three Brazilian regions: Northeast (Caatinga, Cerrado , and Atlantic Forest), Southeast ( Cerrado, Atlantic.. Forest, Cerrado/Atlantic Forest, and

Three models of generalization, as proposed in a seminal article by Firestone, are discussed in this paper: classic sample-to-population (statistical) generalization,

Conh 2007 enumera implicações dessas características: um sistema de saúde dual, um para os assalariados do mercado formal e outro para os não assalariados, além do liberal para

As a consequence of these two contrasting stresses, the hyperseasonal cerrado in ENP is an impoverished form of cerrado, with fewer species and lower diversity than seasonal cerrado

ABSTRACT: This study aims to evaluate the effect of different management systems on the fl oristic composition and diversity of a fragment of Cerrado sensu stricto vegetation

The ordering axis produced by the canonical correspondence analysis of the 10 plots sampled in rupestrian cerrado vegetation; interrelations between the distribution of