• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Braz. Dent. J. vol.27 número2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Braz. Dent. J. vol.27 número2"

Copied!
9
0
0

Texto

Imagem

Figure 1. Surface morphology of human dentin slices after treatment by tested root conditioning agents as analyzed by SEM
Table 2. Mean and standard deviations (SD) of cell viability, statistical categories by Tukey test  and P values calculated by Dunnett test
Figure 2. Attached fibroblasts cell of human dentin seem by SEM. (A) Control group, (B) root surface scaling and root planning, (C) citric acid,  (D) EDTA, (E) tetracycline capsule, and (F) tetracycline gel (Original magnification ×3000)
Figure 3. Effect of surface treatment on fibrin clot formation on dentin. (A) Control group, (B) root surface scaling and root planning, (C) citric  acid, (D) EDTA, (E) tetracycline capsule, and (F) tetracycline gel (Original magnification ×3000).

Referências

Documentos relacionados

136 Figura 63 - Effect of the pH conditions at cathodic and anodic reservoirs during the ESR for removing petroleum from soil by applying different currents see Table 12.. 137 Figura

Demineralized dentin beams (n = 15/group) were randomly divided in five groups and treated with distilled water (control) or one of the four biomodification solutions tested (PACs

Methods: Fourteen Wistar albino rats were randomly divided into two groups with experimen- tal nerve crush injuries: a control group, which received saline treatment post-crush, and

The 96 artiicial teeth were divided into 6 groups, according to the following surface treatments: CT - no treatment (control); MN - the tooth bases were etched twice with

Teeth were randomly divided into 7 groups: Group 1 (control group): direct composite resin restoration (Alert) with etch-and-rinse adhesive system (Bond 1 primer/adhesive), Group

Methods: Ten randomly selected bovine teeth were used, i.e., 2 in the control group, and the other 8 divided into two groups, which had orthodontic brackets bonded to their

After demineralization, the samples were randomly divided into five equal experimental groups: Group 1 (control), the brackets were bonded without any surface treatment; Group 2,

Rats were randomly divided into two main groups: a control group, which received ischemic colonic anastomosis only, and an experimental group, which received both ischemic