Esta Tese está estruturada em três seções principais. Esta primeira secção é composta pela Introdução, que fornece uma panorâmica transversal da literatura alusiva ao conjunto de artigos que compõem o corpo da tese, sendo também detalhados os objetivos e questões de investigação, as unidades de análise e os métodos subjacentes. A segunda seção é composta por sete capítulos o que corresponde a sete estudos empíricos. A terceira, e última secção, apresenta as considerações finais da tese, as conclusões e os contributos originados pela investigação. Uma síntese da estrutura da Tese é apresentada na Figura 5.
Figura 5 – Estrutura da Tese
Capitulo 9
Conclusões Implicações e Contributos da investigação Limitações e futuras linhas de investigação
Capitulo 8
Gamificação no ensino da gestão - Relação entre os principais construtos
Capitulo 7
A influência dos factores sociais na atitude dos estudantes para utilizar recursos gamificados como ferramentas de aprendizagem
Capitulo 6
Jogue novamente - Como é que os jogos sérios melhoram a imersão na aprendizagem da Gestão?
Capitulo 5
Motivação dos alunos da área da Gestão com (sem) a utilização da Gamificação
Capitulo 4
Escala Académica da Motivação – Adaptação, Aplicação e Validação em estudantes da área da Gestão
Capitulo 3
Gamificação no Ensino em geral e da Gestão em particular – Mapeamento da Literatura
Capitulo 2
Gamificação no Ensino– Revisão da Literatura e proposta de modelo conceptual de investigação
Capitulo 1
18
Referências bibliográficas
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Baker, R. K., & White, K. M. (2010). Predicting adolescents’ use of social networking sites from an extended theory of planned behaviour perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1591– 1597.
Barañano, A. M. (2004). Métodos e técnicas de investigação em gestão: manual de apoio à realização
de trabalhos de investigação.
Bornmann, L. (2015). Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics, 103(3), 1123–1144.
Bos, N., & Shami, N. (2006). Adapting a Face-to-Face Role-Playing Simulation for Online Play.
Educational Technology Research & Development, 54(5), 493–521.
Brom, C., Preuss, M., & Klement, D. (2011). Are educational computer micro-games engaging and effective for knowledge acquisition at high-schools? A quasi-experimental study. Computers and
Education, 57(3), 1971–1988. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.007
Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2015). Business research methods. Oxford University Press, USA.
Burguillo, J. C. (2010). Using game theory and Competition-based Learning to stimulate student motivation and performance. Computers and Education, 55(2), 566–575. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.018
Cabus, S. J., & De Witte, K. (2016). Why do students leave education early? Theory and evidence on high school dropout rates. Journal of Forecasting, 35(8), 690–702.
Cagiltay, N. E. (2007). Teaching software engineering by means of computer-game development: Challenges and opportunities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 405–415. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00705.x
Chang, K. E., Wu, L. J., Weng, S. E., & Sung, Y. T. (2012). Embedding game-based problem-solving phase into problem-posing system for mathematics learning. Computers and Education, 58(2), 775–786. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.002
Chen, C., Chen, P., & Chen, P. (2011). Total Quality Management & Business Excellence Teaching quality in higher education : An introductory review on a process- oriented teaching-quality model, (September 2014), 37–41. http://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.637789
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The domain of creativity.
Cuenca López, J. M., & Martín Cáceres, M. J. (2010). Virtual games in social science education.
Computers and Education, 55(3), 1336–1345. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.028
Deterding, S. (2012). Gamification: designing for motivation. Interactions, 19(4), 14–17.
Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In CHI’11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing
systems (pp. 2425–2428).
Dickey, M. D. (2011). Murder on Grimm Isle: The impact of game narrative design in an educational game-based learning environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(3), 456–469. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01032.x
Ebner, M., & Holzinger, A. (2007). Successful implementation of user-centered game based learning in higher education: An example from civil engineering. Computers and Education, 49(3), 873– 890. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.026
Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2003). How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants. In Proceedings
of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences (pp. 1–15).
Freeman, J., & Simonsen, B. (2015). Examining the impact of policy and practice interventions on high school dropout and school completion rates: A systematic review of the literature. Review
of Educational Research, 85(2), 205–248.
Fu, F. L., Su, R. C., & Yu, S. C. (2009). EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of e-
learning games. Computers and Education, 52(1), 101–112.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.004
Gartner. (2011). More Than 50 Percent of Organizations That Manage Innovation Processes Will Gamify Those Processes. Press Release, Gartner Inc.
Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20.
Guillén-Nieto, V., & Aleson-Carbonell, M. (2012). Serious games and learning effectiveness: The case
of It’s a Deal! Computers and Education, 58(1), 435–448.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.015
Gwo-Jen Hwang, Po-Han Wu, & Chi-Chang Chen. (2012). An online game approach for improving students’ learning performance in web-based problem-solving activities. Computers &
Education, 59(4), 41246–1256. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.009
Habgood, M. P. J. (2007). The effective integration of digital games and learning content. University of Nottingham.
Hamari, J., & Eranti, V. (2011). Framework for designing and evaluating game achievements. Proc.
DiGRA 2011: Think Design Play, 115(115), 122–134.
Hamari, J., Huotari, K., & Tolvanen, J. (2015). Gamification and economics. The Gameful World:
Approaches, Issues, Applications, 139.
Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2015). Why do people use gamification services? International Journal of
Information Management, 35(4). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2015.04.006
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?--a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference
on (pp. 3025–3034).
Hamari, J., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2010). Game design as marketing: How game mechanics create demand for virtual goods.
Harris, K., & Reid, D. (2005). The influence of virtual reality play on children ’ s motivation.
Education.
Hill, F. M. (1995). Managing service quality in higher education : the role of the student as primary consumer, 3(3), 10–21.
Huotari, K., & Hamari, J. (2012). Defining Gamification - A Service Marketing Perspective. Proceeding
of the 16th International Academic MindTrek Conference on - MindTrek ’12.
http://doi.org/10.1145/2393132.2393137
Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward. Cambridge, MA: The
Education Arcade.
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2014). Demographic differences in perceived benefits from gamification.
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 35, 179–188. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.007
Landers, R. N. (2014). Developing a Theory of Gamified Learning: Linking Serious Games and Gamification of Learning. Simulation and Gaming, 45(6), 752–768. http://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114563660
Langstrand, J., Cronemyr, P., & Poksinska, B. (2015). Practise what you preach: quality of education in education on quality. Total quality management & business excellence, 26(11–12), 1202–1212. http://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2014.925290
Lassibille, G., & Navarro Gómez, L. (2008). Why do higher education students drop out? Evidence from Spain. Education Economics, 16(1), 89–105.
Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic
Exchange Quarterly, 15(2), 146.
Lin, K.-Y., & Lu, H.-P. (2011). Why people use social networking sites: An empirical study integrating network externalities and motivation theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(3), 1152–1161. Liu, T. Y., & Chu, Y. L. (2010). Using ubiquitous games in an English listening and speaking course: Impact on learning outcomes and motivation. Computers and Education, 55(2), 630–643. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.023
Lowrie, T., & Jorgensen, R. (2011). Gender differences in students’ mathematics game playing.
Computers & Education, 57(4), 2244–2248. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.010
Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science, 5(4), 333–369. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0364-0213(81)80017-1
McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the
world. Penguin.
Miller, L. M., Chang, C. I., Wang, S., Beier, M. E., & Klisch, Y. (2011). Learning and motivational impacts of a multimedia science game. Computers and Education, 57(1), 1425–1433. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.016
Moreno-Ger, P., Burgos, D., Martínez-Ortiz, I., Sierra, J. L., & Fernández-Manjón, B. (2008). Educational game design for online education. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2530–2540.
20
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.012
Oinas-Kukkonen, H., & Harjumaa, M. (2009). Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24(1), 28. Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital Game-Based Learning in high school Computer Science education:
Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1– 12. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.004
Prensky, M. (2006). Don’t bother me, Mom, I’m learning!: How computer and video games are
preparing your kids for 21st century success and how you can help! Paragon house St. Paul, MN.
Ravenscroft, A. (2007). Promoting thinking and conceptual change with digital dialogue games.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(6), 453–465. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-
2729.2007.00232.x
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68.
Sharples, M., de Roock, R., Ferguson, R., Gaved, M., Herodotou, C., Koh, E., … others. (2016). Innovating pedagogy 2016: Open university innovation report 5.
Sung, H.-Y., & Hwang, G.-J. (2013). A Collaborative Game-based Learning Approach to Improving Students’ Learning Performance in Science Courses. Computers & Education, 63, 43–51. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.019
Tüzün, H., Yilmaz-Soylu, M., Karakuş, T., Inal, Y., & Kizilkaya, G. (2009). The effects of computer games on primary school students’ achievement and motivation in geography learning.
Computers and Education, 52(1), 68–77. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.06.008
Ulicsak, M., & Wright, M. (2010). Serious games in education.
Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017.
Van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It’s not just the digital natives who are restless.
EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 16.
Van Eck, R. (2007). Building intelligent learning games. Games and Simulations in Online Learning
Research & Development Frameworks, 271–397. http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59904-304-
3.ch014
Wang, L., & Chen, M. (2010). The effects of game strategy and preference‐matching on flow experience and programming performance in game‐based learning. Innovations in Education and
Teaching International, 47(1), 39–52. http://doi.org/10.1080/14703290903525838
Wastiau, P., Kearney, C., & den Berghe, W. (2009). How are digital games used in schools. European
Schoolnet.
Watson, W. R., Mong, C. J., & Harris, C. A. (2011). A case study of the in-class use of a video game for teaching high school history. Computers and Education, 56(2), 466–474. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.09.007
Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press.
Yildiz, S. M. (2012). Total Quality Management & Business Excellence Service quality evaluation in the school of physical education and sports : An empirical investigation of students ’ perceptions, (January 2014), 37–41. http://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.637804
CAPÍTULO 2
Gamificação no Ensino – Revisão da Literatura e proposta de modelo
conceptual de investigação
Resumo
A qualidade do ensino é, cada vez mais, fundamental para o sucesso de qualquer instituição seja qual for o nível de ensino. Nesse sentido, a Gamificação é uma ferramenta utilizada para incrementar a qualidade do processo de ensino ajudando professores e alunos a atingirem os seus objetivos de curto, médio e longo prazos. Tendo em consideração a problemática enunciada e a sua consequente importância, tanto em termos académicos como para a sociedade em geral, este artigo tem como objetivo geral a realização e uma revisão da literatura e proposta de um modelo conceptual de investigação sobre a aplicação da Gamificação como ferramenta orientada para a melhoria da qualidade do processo de ensino.
Como objetivos específicos pretende-se realizar uma revisão da literatura mais relevante sobre a aplicação da gamificação a contextos educacionais, assim como descrever quais são as principais temáticas e construtos da gamificação.
Para a realização desta revisão de literatura, foi utilizado um protocolo de pesquisa e critérios de refinamento, no qual se definiram etapas concretas de execução da pesquisa e análise da literatura baseada em artigos científicos publicados na base dados ISI Web of Science e na Scopus.