• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Comparing Subspace Methods for Closed Loop Subspace System Identification by Monte Carlo Simulations

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Share "Comparing Subspace Methods for Closed Loop Subspace System Identification by Monte Carlo Simulations"

Copied!
20
0
0

Texto

Loading

Referências

Documentos relacionados

These results confirm the view taken by several authors (e.g. Amendum et al., 2009; Connor et al., 2011; Pressley et al., 2001), that combining code instruction with text reading

Cav- alcante, “Filtered delay-subspace approach for pilot assisted channel estimation in OFDM systems,” in Proceedings of the VII IEEE Workshop on Signal Processing Advances for

In this section, SDPC, Open Loop Power Control (OLPC), Closed Loop Power Control (CLPC) are step by step analyzed. At first, the SDPC and the OLPC are calibrated and evaluated.

two static nonlinearities are included in the loop. Note that this is the case of the pH neutralizer. Figure 4: The closed loop scheme for Wiener Model. Now, the controller

Sometimes the obtained closed-loop performance is not satisfactory as the adequate functioning of the DC-DC converter in closed loop, does not depend exclusively on the kind

Key words: coupled Lyapunov matrix equations; Krylov subspace methods; nonsymmetric block Lanczos process; reduced order model; transfer

In these two models, they consider that the Standard Model particles and forces, with exception of gravity are confined to a four-dimensional subspace, within the five-

In these simulations, standard Metropolis Monte Carlo methods are used to examine the basic properties of the model, such as equilibration configurations, overall size, and