Corrigendum to "Impact of CO₂ and climate on the Last Glacial Maximum vegetation: results from the ORCHIDEE/IPSL models" published in Clim. Past, 7, 557–577, 2011

Clim. Past, 7, 1457, 2011 www.clim-past.net/7/1457/2011/ doi:10.5194/cp-7-1457-2011

© Author(s) 2011. CC Attribution 3.0 License.

Climate

of the Past

Corrigendum to

“Impact of CO

2

and climate on the Last Glacial Maximum

vegetation: results from the ORCHIDEE/IPSL models” published in

Clim. Past, 7, 557–577, 2011

M.-N. Woillez1, M. Kageyama1, G. Krinner2, N. de Noblet-Ducoudr´e1, N. Viovy1, and M. Mancip1

1_{LSCE/IPSL INSU, UMR1572, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, CE Saclay, l’Orme des Merisiers, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France} 2_{LGGE, UMR5183, CNRS, 54 rue Moli`ere, 38402 St. Martin d’H`eres Cedex, France}

-90 -80 -70 -60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0

CTRL LGM

T

rBR _TrBE _{TempNE TempBE TempBS B}oNE _BoBS _BoNS

%

Fig. 13. Percentage of change in the area of presence of the tree PFT (fraction exceeds 1 %) when the CO2is decreased from 310

to 185 ppm and the background climate is kept constant to CTRL present or LGM. Abbreviations: see Table 1.

In the manuscript “Impact of CO2 and climate on the

Last Glacial Maximum vegetation: results from the OR-CHIDEE/IPSL models” by M.-N. Woillez et al., Fig. 14 has been accidentally replaced by the same figure as Fig. 13 in the final published manuscript. The Sect. “4.2.4 Impact of LGM CO2for a modern background climate” on p. 571,

sec-ond paragraph, should refer to Fig. 13. The Sect. “4.3 Impact of dynamics and competitivity” on p. 572, second paragraph, should refer to Fig. 14.

On p. 571, right column, Sect. 4.2.4 the sentence should read: For TrBE and TrBR, the decrease is less than 20 % with a glacial climate in background, and more than 30 % under a modern climate (Fig. 13). For TempNE the response is similar for both climates, but for BoNE the decrease is much

Correspondence to:M.-N. Woillez (marie-noelle.woillez@lsce.ipsl.fr)

CTRLP CTRLG LGMP LGMG

gC/m2/y

ear

TrBE TempNE TempBS BoNE BoBS

TrBEP310 TrBEP185 TrBEG310 TrBEG185

TempNEP310 TempNEP185 TempNEG310 TempNEG185 TempBSP310 TempBSP185 TempBSG310 TempBSG185

B

oNEP310 _BoNEP185 _BoNEG310 _BoNEP185 _BoBSP310 _BoBSP185 _BoBSG310 _BoBSG185

Fig. 14. Global annual mean NPP for the static simulations with an imposed vegetation. Legend at the top: names of the PFTs (see Table 1). Legend to the right hand-side: climatic and CO₂forcings (see Table 2). Legend at the bottom: names of the simulations (see Table 3).

stronger in LGM climatic conditions than in modern climate (−60 % vs.−40 %, respectively, see Fig. 13).

On p. 572, left column, Sect. 4.3 the sentence should read: The results presented in Fig. 14 show that the decrease of the global mean NPP in response to the decrease in CO2is very

similar under a modern climate or a LGM climate.