• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. vol.58 número4 en v58n4a04

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Assoc. Med. Bras. vol.58 número4 en v58n4a04"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

AT THE BEDSIDE

401

Rev Assoc Med Bras 2012; 58(4):401

Surgery

What is the best approach for patients at high risk for colorectal cancer?

ELIAS JIRJOSS ILIAS

PhD in Surgery, Medical Sciences School, Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo (FCMSCSP); Full Professor of the Brazilian College of Surgeons, São Paulo, SP, Brazil – eliasilias@hotmail.com

©2012 Elsevier Editora Ltda. All rights reserved.

During the Digestive Disease Week (DDW) 2012, in San Diego, California during May 2012, one of the sym-posia established a line of evidence-based monitoring for patients at high risk for colorectal cancer. his monitor-ing focused on patients that underwent surgery due to colorectal cancer and their families, as well as patients with intestinal polyps. he monitoring suggestions were based on scientiic studies that followed thousands of patients in diferent countries.

Due to the great importance of this issue, especially in Brazil, it was considered worthwhile to publish these fol-low-up recommendations in the “At the Bedside” section of the Journal of the Brazilian Medical Association (RAMB).

A) Recommendations for the patient who has been sub-mitted to surgery due to colorectal cancer:

– Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) measurement ev-ery three months in the two irst years, and evev-ery six months from the third to the ith year ater the surgery;

– horough clinical examination in the physician’s of-ice at the same frequency of CEA measurement; – Colonoscopy every six months in the irst three

years to check for recurrence at the anastomosis; – CT of the abdomen and pelvis three times a year

in the irst two years and subsequently, every six months until the ith year. he liver may be the site of asymptomatic metastases in 27% of the patients. he risk of tumor recurrence is higher in the irst two years; ater ive years, the risk is only 1%.

B) Screening of family members of patients with colorec-tal cancer:

– First-degree relatives are two to three times more likely to contract colorectal cancer than the general population. If the individual’s parents had colorectal cancer, the chance to present the disease is ive times greater than the general population. Colonoscopy is recommended every three years in all these family members.

C) Familial intestinal polyposis

– Patients with familial polyposis should undergo to-tal colectomy or toto-tal proctocolectomy. he appear-ance of tumors in the rectum (when preserved), duodenum, and stomach of these patients must be monitored. Siblings of patients with familial polyp-osis should be screened to verify whether they have the syndrome; if they do, they should be submitted to the same procedures.

D) Adenomas

– Patients with adenomas should undergo annual colonoscopy and polypectomy to screen for the ap-pearance of new polyps. First-degree relatives over 40 years old of patients with advanced polyps should undergo colonoscopy every ive years at minimum.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Vesicoenteric fistulas are generally the consequences of inflammatory processes of the bowel, mainly colonic di- verticulitis; colorectal cancer and, more rarely, carcinoma of

the process of care for people with colorectal cancer, the nurse needs to go beyond guiding their patients due to the discovery of a disease, should also monitor how individuals

Although several studies in some types of cancer, including colorectal, do not elucidate whether the increased risk of cancer in obese people is due to excess weight, more studies

In 2008, the American Cancer Society, in association with the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (representing the three major American gastroenterological societies

Immunohistochemistry versus microsatellite instability testing for screening colorectal cancer patients at risk for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer syndrome. Part 1:

The results shown in Table 3 indicate that the ostomized group due to colorectal cancer had affected subcategories, namely: negative subcategory – physical strength ( p ≤ 0.0001),

Conclusion - The prevalence of celiac disease among irst degree celiac patients´ relatives was 3.1%, 4.5 times higher than the general Portuguese population (0,7%) witch reinforces

Assim, a digestão anaeróbia de chorumes suinícolas associados a resíduos de culturas ou resíduos agro-industriais e alimentares tem cada vez mais interesse, numa perspectiva