• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. vol.37 número6

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. vol.37 número6"

Copied!
7
0
0

Texto

(1)

w w w . r b h h . o r g

Revista

Brasileira

de

Hematologia

e

Hemoterapia

Brazilian

Journal

of

Hematology

and

Hemotherapy

Original

article

Health-related

quality

of

life

among

blood

donors

with

hepatitis

B

and

hepatitis

C:

longitudinal

study

before

and

after

diagnosis

Francisco

Augusto

Porto

Ferreira

a,∗

,

Cesar

de

Almeida-Neto

a

,

Maria

Cristina

Dias

Teixeira

b

,

Edna

Strauss

b

aFundac¸ãoPró-Sangue,HemocentrodeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

bHospitaldasClínicas,FaculdadedeMedicina,UniversidadedeSãoPaulo(HCFMUSP),SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory: Received25May2015 Accepted24August2015

Availableonline13September2015

Keywords: HepatitisB HepatitisC Qualityoflife

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Introduction:Thereisevidencethatpatientssufferingfromchronichepaticdiseases, includ-ingchronichepatitisBandchronichepatitisC,haveareducedhealth-relatedqualityoflife. Theaimofthisstudywastoevaluatetheimpactofthenotificationoftestresultsforhepatitis BandhepatitisConthequalityoflifeofblooddonors.

Methods:Overa29-monthperiod,thisstudyassessedthequalityoflifeof105blooddonors withpositiveserologicalscreeningtestsforhepatitisBandhepatitisCanddonorswho presentedfalse-positivetestresults.TheMedicalOutcomeStudy36-ItemShortFormHealth SurveyQuestionnairewasappliedatthreetimepoints:(1)whenanadditionalbloodsample wascollectedforconfirmatorytests;(2)whendonorswerenotifiedabouttheirserological status;and(3)whendonors,positiveforhepatitisBandhepatitisC,startedclinical follow-up.QualityoflifescoresfortheconfirmedhepatitisBandhepatitisCgroupswerecompared tothefalse-positivecontrolgroup.

Results:Thedomainsbodilypain,generalhealthperception,socialfunction,andmental healthandthephysicalcomponentimprovedsignificantlyindonorswithhepatitisCfrom TimePoint1toTimePoint3.Health-relatedqualityoflifescoresofdonorsdiagnosedwith hepatitisBandhepatitisCweresignificantlylowerinsixandfouroftheeightdomains, respectively,comparedtothefalse-positivecontrolgroup.

Conclusion: Adecreasedqualityoflifewasdetected beforeandafterdiagnosisin blood donorswithhepatitisBandhepatitisC.ContrarytohepatitisBpositivedonors,the pos-sibilityofmedicalcaremayhaveimprovedthequalityoflifeamonghepatitisCpositive donors.

©2015Associac¸ãoBrasileiradeHematologia,HemoterapiaeTerapiaCelular.Published byElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.

Correspondingauthorat:RuaPedrosoAlvarenga,86,apt43,ItaimBibi,04531-011SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil.

E-mailaddress:[email protected](F.A.P.Ferreira). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjhh.2015.08.004

(2)

Introduction

Hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) are major public healthproblemswith350millionand150millioninfections worldwide,respectively.1 Due totheir asymptomatic devel-opment,theirdiagnosisoftenoccursduringblooddonation. TheprevalenceofconcordantHBsAgandanti-HBctestsis213 per100,000donationsinSãoPaulo,whileconfirmedanti-HCV reactivityis287per100,000donations.2Severalstudieshave shownthatpatientswithHBVorHCVmaypresentemotional, socialorpsychologicaldisordersthatcanimpacttheir health-relatedqualityoflife(HRQOL)evenwhenasymptomaticorin thepresenceofminorsymptoms.3,4

HRQOL refers to a patient’s subjective assessment or perceptionofhis/hercomplete physical, mentaland social well-being,includingarangeofconditionsnotlimitedto med-icalinterventions.5TheassessmentofHRQOLhasprovento beaneffectivetooltounderstandthesubjectiveimpactthat diseaseshaveonpatients.Severalinstrumentsareavailable toevaluatethebiomedicalandpsychosocialaspectsusedto measureHRQOL.Theseinstrumentsareclassifiedasgeneric orspecific.6Genericinstrumentscanbeuniversallyapplied andallowcomparisonsbetweendifferentdiseasesordifferent populations.Specificinstruments arecapableofestimating the quality of life associated with specific aspects of dis-eases(e.g.,diabetesorasthma),populations(e.g.,seniors)or functions(e.g.,functional capacityorsexual function).The instrumentmostcommonlyusedtomeasureHRQOListhe MedicalOutcomeStudy36-ItemShortFormHealthSurvey (SF-36),whichisagenericinstrumentwithquestionsdividedinto eightdomains.Answersareconvertedintonumericalvalues, withhigherscoresrepresentingbetterHRQOL.7

Generally,HRQOLisimpairedinpatientswithchronicliver diseaseregardlessoftheetiology,andthelevelofthescores has been associated with disease severity. In HCV where HRQOL has been most studied, it hasbeen proposed that themerepresenceofHCVcausesadropinqualityoflife.8 Moreover,a notabledecrease in HRQOLhas been detected in HCV-positiveblood donors unaware oftheir condition.9 Anotherhypothesisisthattheimpactofthediagnosisof hep-atitisCcausesareductioninHRQOLincarriers.10Forhepatitis B,HRQOLstudiesaremorefrequentinendemicareassuch asregionsofimmigrantsfromKorea11andinpatientsfrom Singapore.12

Theaim of this study is toevaluate the impact ofthe diagnosisofHBVandHCVonHRQOLduringthenotification andcounselingprocessinapopulationofseropositiveblood donors.

Methods

Population

Blood donors with positive serological screening tests for HBV (concomitant HBsAg and anti-HBc) and HCV (enzyme immunoassay – EIA) were recruited among donors who returnedforperformconfirmatorytests.

Routinely,whenadonorpresentsapositiveserologictest, aletterissentwithin30daysinvitinghim/hertoreturnto

the blood bank foradditional laboratorytests. Upon retur-ning tothe blood center, a new blood sample is collected and confirmatory tests are performed. For the purpose of thisstudy,donorswereconsideredHBV-positiveiftheywere repeat-reactive forbothHBsAgEIAandanti-HBcEIAinthe screeningandconfirmatorysamples.Donorswereconsidered HCV-positiveiftheanti-HCVEIAtestswererepeat-reactiveat thetimeofdonationandintheconfirmatoryfollow-upsample andtheimmunoblotwaspositiveintheconfirmatorysample. Donors were considered tobefalse-positiveforHCV when theanti-HCVEIAtestwaspositiveorborderlineatthetime ofdonationandtheconfirmatorytestandimmunoblotwere negativeintheconfirmatorysample.Afterconfirmatorytests, donorswerenotifiedandcounseledabouttheresults.Those whowereconfirmedtobeHBVorHCVpositivewerereferredto agovernmenthealthcareclinicspecializinginhepatitiscare foradditionalevaluation,laboratorytests,liverbiopsiesand treatmentwhennecessary.

The inclusion criterion was HBV or HCV-positive blood donors who completed the three phasesof the study and false-positive donors who completed the first two phases. Theexclusioncriteriawere (1)donorswho werepreviously awareoftheirserologicalstatusforHBVandHCV;(2)donors withpositiveserologicscreeningtestsforhuman immuno-deficiencyvirusinfection(HIV),humanT-lymphotropicvirus type 1 and 2 (HTLV-1/2), syphilis, or Chagas disease; (3) donorswithconcomitantreactiveserologicscreeningtestsfor HBV and HCV;and (4)donorswho presentedanti-HCVEIA repeat-reactiveorinconclusiveresultsandanindeterminate immunoblotattheconfirmatorytest.

Aftertheconfirmatorytests,theparticipantsweredivided into threegroups: (1)HBV-positive;(2)HCV-positiveand (3) False-positivecontrols.

Studydesign

ProspectivecohortcollectionofsequentialHRQOLdatawas carried outatthreetimepoints.SF-36questionnaireswere appliedforall phases,andscoresamongdonorsdiagnosed withHBV andHCVand thefalse-positivegroupwere com-pared.Afterobtaininginformedconsent,inthe firstphase, donorswereaskedtofillouttheSF-36whentheyreturnedfor retesting.Forilliteratedonors,questionnaireswereappliedby trainedphysicians.Inthesecondphase,donorswhowere con-firmedasHBVorHCVpositiveafterretestingwereinformed abouttheirserologicstatusandaskedtofillouttheSF-36 ques-tionnaireasecondtime.Donorswhopresentedfalse-positive screeningtest profileswere alsoaskedtofill out theSF-36 questionnaireatthistime(false-positivecontrolgroup).Inthe thirdphase,blooddonorsdiagnosedwithHBVorHCVwere subjectedtoaclinicalevaluationatareferralcenteraftera30 to60-dayintervalandaskedtofillouttheSF-36forthethird time.Figure1showsthedifferentphasesoftheprotocolto whichblooddonorsweresubjectedduringthestudy.

(3)

R, reactive NR, non-reactive

Clinical & laboratorial evaluation SF-36 (3rd)

Clinical & laboratorial evaluation SF-36 (3rd)

Time point 1

Time point 2

Confirmatory tests: Anti-HCV(R) and immunoblot

(NR)

SF-36 (2nd) Notification & counseling

False-positive control

Confirmatory tests: HBsAg (R) e anti-HBc (R)

SF-36 (2nd) Notification & counseling & refered to the outpatient ward

Hepatitis C group

SF-36 (2nd) Notification & counseling & refered to the outpatient ward

Hepatitis B group

Time point 3

Donors with HBsAg(+) and an ti-HBc(+) or anti-HCV(+) at

screening

Donors recalled for confirmatory tests + SF-36 (1st)

Confirmatory tests: Anti-HCV(R) and immunoblot

(R)

Figure1–Studyflowchart.

health.SF-36scoreswerealsoanalyzedintheformofarange summarizedasphysicalandmentalcomponents.The physi-calcomponentisformedbythedomainsphysicalfunctioning, physicalrole,bodilypainandgeneralhealthperception,while the mental component is formed by the domains vitality, socialfunctioning,emotionalroleandmentalhealth.Possible scoresvaryfromzerotoonehundredwiththehighestscore correspondingtothebestqualityoflife.

Statisticalanalysis

ThenonparametricFriedmantestwasusedtocomparemeans andstandarddeviationsforeachdomainoftheSF-36ofthe HBVandHCVgroupsatTimePoints1,2and3.TheWilcoxon testwasusedtocomparemeansofthetwohepatitisgroupsat thefirstandsecondTimePointswiththemeanscoresforeach domainoftheSF-36ofdonorswhopresentedfalse-positive results.Thesignificancelevelwassetat5%(p-value≤0.05).

Laboratorymethods

LaboratorytestingwasperformedattheSerologyDivisionof the Fundac¸ãoPró-São Paulo Hemocentrode São Paulo fol-lowingusualbloodbankproceduresforHBVsurfaceantigen, HBVcoreantibody,syphilis,anti-HCV,anti-HTLV-1/2,Chagas disease,andanti-HIV-1and-2.Serologicreactiveunitswere

discardedaccordingtoinstitutionpolicy.14Donorswho pre-sentedanypositivescreeningtestresultswerecontactedto collectanothersample.

The Enzygnost HBsAg 5.0 (Siemens, Marburg, Germany) andEnzygnostAnti-HBcmonoclonal(Siemens,Marburg, Ger-many)testswere usedforHBV screeningand confirmatory tests and the Murex anti-HCV version 4.0 (Abbott, South Africa)testwasusedforHCVscreening.Animmunoblot (CHI-RONRIBAHCV3.0S/A,Emeryville,USA)wasusedfortheHCV confirmatorytest.

Results

Over a period of 29 months, 211 blood donors with reac-tivescreeningtestsforHBVandHCVwereenrolled.Among them, 32 were diagnosed with HBV, 35 with HCV and 38 hadscreeningteststhatwerereactiveforHCVthatwerenot confirmedintheadditionalconfirmatorytestandwere con-sideredfalse-positiveresults.Theremaining106(50%)donors withreactiveserologicscreeningtestsforHBVorHCVdidnot completeallthephasesofthefollow-upandwereexcluded.

(4)

Table1–Gender,ethnicityandageofblooddonorswithhepatitisBandhepatitisCcomparedtoacontrolgroupofblood donorswithfalse-positiveresults.

HepatitisB (n=32)

p-Value HepatitisC (n=35)

p-Value False-positivecontrols (n=38)

Gender–n(%) 0.438 0.312

Male 22(68.7) 20(57.1) 23(60.5)

Female 10(31.2) 15(42.9) 15(39.5)

Ethnicity–n(%) 0.745 0.681

White 13(40.6) 19(54.2) 21(55.3)

Black 8(25.0) 8(22.8) 6(15.8)

Mixed 11(34.4) 8(22.8) 11(28.9)

Age 0.046 0.030

Mean 36.2±9.7 37.1±10.8 31.5±7.0

Median 37.5 36.0 29.0

Range 19–55 18–57 21–49

and HCV (37.1±10.8 years) groups (p-value=0.046 and p -value=0.03,respectively).

LongitudinalanalysisusingtheMedicalOutcomeStudy 36-ItemShortFormHealthSurvey

TherewasanimprovementinHRQOLinthegroupofdonors diagnosedwithHCVinthebodilypain(p-value=0.011), gen-eral health perception (p-value <0.001), social functioning (p-value=0.019),andmentalhealthdomains(p-value=0.033) and the physical component (p-value=0.007) of the SF-36 summarizedscale.Incontrast,therewerenosignificant dif-ferencesinthelongitudinalanalysisofallstudieddomainsof donorsdiagnosedwithHBV(Tables2and3).

ComparisonbetweengroupofdonorswithhepatitisBand Candthefalse-positivecontrolgroup

DonorswithHBVversusdonorswithHCV

Using the SF-36questionnaire priortoconfirmation ofthe infection(TimePoint1),therewerenosignificantdifferences foranyoftheeightdomainsorforthephysicalandmental componentsofthesummaryscalebetweentheHBV-positive andHCV-positiveblooddonors.

DonorswithHBVdiagnosisversusthefalse-positivecontrol group

At Time Point 1, a significantly higher mean was found for the false-positivecontrol group compared to the HBV-positivedonorsforthephysicalroledomain(p-value=0.032) only. At Time Point 2 however, the false-positive con-trol group had significantly higher means for physical functioning (p-value=0.006), physical role (p-value=0.006), bodily pain (p-value=0.006), vitality (p-value=0.017), emo-tionalrole(p-value=0.038),andmentalhealth(p-value=0.030) and boththe physical (p-value=0.019)and mental compo-nents(p-value=0.022)comparedtotheHBV-positivedonors (Table4).

DonorsdiagnosedwithHCVversusthefalse-positivecontrol group

The false-positive control group presented significantly higher means compared to HCV-positive donors at Time Point 1 for physical role (p-value=0.040) and emotional role (p-value=0.042) and at Time Point 2 for physical role (p-value=0.010), vitality (p-value=0.037), social func-tioning (p-value=0.010)and emotionalrole (p-value=0.005) (Table5).

Table2–ScoresforthedifferentdomainsandcomponentsoftheMedicalOutcomeStudy36-ItemShortFormHealth Survey(SF-36)duringthelongitudinalanalysisofdonorswithhepatitisB(n=32).

SF-36 domain

Timepoint1 Timepoint2 Timepoint3 p-Value

PF 84.8±19.3 84.1±17.3 84.1±17.2 0.988

PR 80.4±34.6 80.5±33.4 80.5±29.7 0.878

BP 71.9±25.5 74.8±18.1 68±25.2 0.084

GHP 70.6±16.4 68.9±16.4 69.9±18.4 0.775

VIT 72.9±18.4 79.5±22.8 67.3±21.5 0.549

SF 85.6±16.5 89.6±18.5 85.3±23.8 0.731

ER 78.1±34.5 82.3±30.5 77.1±34.4 0.946

MH 78.3±16.7 74.3±17.1 75.1±16.9 0.801

PC 51.0±7.4 50.9±7.7 51.6±7.5 0.943

MC 51.0±10.3 51.2±8.7 50.2±10.2 0.929

PF:physicalfunctioning;PR:physicalrole;BP:bodilypain;GHP:generalhealthperception;VIT:vitality;SF:socialfunctioning;ER:emotional role;MH:mentalhealth;PC:physicalcomponent;MC:mentalcomponent.

(5)

Table3–ScoresforthedifferentdomainsandcomponentsoftheMedicalOutcomeStudy36-ItemShortFormHealth Survey(SF-36)duringthelongitudinalanalysisofdonorswithhepatitisC(n=35).

SF-36domain Timepoint1 Timepoint2 Timepoint3 p-Value

PF 89.3±14.7 89.7±15.5 91.7±11.2 0.251

PR 90.0±16.3 83.6±22.0 87.1±26.0 0.157

BP 76.4±21.0 80.5±22.0 83.2±17.5 0.011

GHP 70.6±14.6 69.0±18.0 76.8±16.3 <0.001

VIT 72.7±19.9 70.6±20.9 72.3±20.9 0.108

SF 77.3±26.8 76.5±25.6 84.7±27.3 0.019

ER 78.1±31.3 77.2±34.0 79.1±31.4 0.148

MH 74.8±21.4 77.1±19.7 78.3±18.8 0.007

PC 53.0±6.0 53.2±6.9 54.9±5.8 0.007

MC 50.2±10.7 50.1±11.4 51.7±10.7 0.146

PF:physicalfunctioning;PR:physicalrole;BP:bodilypain;GHP:generalhealthperception;VIT:vitality;SF:socialfunctioning;ER:emotional role;MH:mentalhealth;PC:physicalcomponent;MC:mentalcomponent.

Scoresshownasmeansandstandarddeviation.

Table4–ScoresforeachdomainandcomponentoftheMedicalOutcomeStudy36-ItemShortFormHealthSurvey (SF-36)comparingdonorswithhepatitisBandfalse-positivecontrols.

SF-36domain Timepoint1 Timepoint2

HBV FP p-Value HBV FP p-Value

(n=32) (n=38) Wilcoxon (n=32) (n=38) Wilcoxon

PF 84.8±14.7 91.1±12.4 0.162 84.1±17.3 93.9±8.1 0.006

PR 80.4±34.6 93.4±23.0 0.032 80.5±33.4 96.7±10.4 0.006

BP 71.9±25.5 78.7±22.2 0.309 74.8±18.1 86.6±16.3 0.006

GHP 70.6±14.6 70.1±11.5 0.939 68.9±16.4 71.5±13.2 0.343

VIT 72.9±18.4 74.1±18.4 0.586 68.0±22.9 80.4±16.1 0.017

SF 85.6±16.5 86.0±20.7 0.495 89.6±18.5 90.6±18.4 0.367

ER 78.1±34.5 90.4±23.1 0.103 82.3±30.5 93.0±23.4 0.038

MH 78.3±16.7 78.4±15.7 0.924 74.3±17.1 81.5±15.5 0.030

PC 51.0±7.4 53.5±5.0 0.154 51.0±7.7 55.1±3.3 0.019

MC 51.0±10.3 52.4±8.8 0.513 51.2±8.7 54.1±9.4 0.022

HBV:hepatitisBgroup;FP:false-positivegroup;PF:physicalfunctioning;PR:physicalrole;BP:bodilypain;GHP:generalhealthperception;VIT: vitality;SF:socialfunctioning;ER:emotionalrole;MH:mentalhealth;PC:physicalcomponent;MC:mentalcomponent.

Scoresshownasmeansandstandarddeviation.

Table5–ScoresforeachdomainandcomponentoftheMedicalOutcomeStudy36-ItemShortFormHealthSurvey (SF-36)comparingdonorswithhepatitisCandfalse-positivecontrols.

SF-36domain Timepoint1 Timepoint2

HCV FP p-Value HCV FP p-Value

(n=35) (n=38) Wilcoxon (n=35) (n=38) Wilcoxon

PF 89.3±14.7 91.1±12.4 0.771 89.7±15.5 93.9±8.1 0.587

PR 90.0±16.7 93.4±23.0 0.040 83.6±27.1 96.7±10.4 0.010

BP 76.4±21.1 78.7±22.2 0.608 80.5±22.1 86.6±16.3 0.319

GHP 70.6±14.6 70.1±11.5 0.969 69.0±18.1 71.5±13.2 0.444

VIT 72.7±19.9 74.1±18.1 0.842 70.6±21.0 80.4±16.1 0.037

SF 77.3±26.8 86.0±20.7 0.125 76.5±25.6 90.6±18.4 0.010

ER 78.1±31.3 90.4±23.1 0.042 77.2±34.1 93.0±23.4 0.005

MH 74.8±21.4 78.3±15.7 0.743 77.1±19.7 81.5±15.5 0.446

PC 53.1±6.0 53.5±5.0 0.921 53.2±7.0 55.1±3.3 0.463

MC 50.3±10.7 52.4±8.8 0.494 50.1±11.4 54.1±9.4 0.156

HCV:hepatitisCgroup;FP:false-positivegroup;PF:physicalfunctioning;PR:physicalrole;BP:bodilypain;GHP:generalhealthperception;VIT: vitality;SF:socialfunctioning;ER:emotionalrole;MH:mentalhealth;PC:physicalcomponent;MC:mentalcomponent.

(6)

Discussion

TheHRQOLscoreswerequitesimilarbetweenpatientswith HBVandHCVanddonorswhopresentedfalse-positiveresults atthetimeofthe serologicalscreeningtestsinphase1of thestudy.Consideringalldonorswereunderthesamestress conditions(i.e.,uncertaintyaboutthelikelihoodofhavinga healthproblembecausetheywererecalledtorepeatthe sero-logicaltests),thestressoftheinvestigationappearedtobe effectivelyreflectedintheHRQOL.ComparedtotheHBVand HCVgroups,thefalse-positivecontrolsshowedimprovement inHRQOLscoresafternotificationthattheconfirmatorytests werenegative(TimePoint2)andthattheyhadnoserologic evidenceofHBV,HCVorother transfusion-transmitted dis-eases.Thereliefprovidedbythenegativeconfirmatoryresults improvedtheHRQOLofthefalse-positivecontrolscompared tothegroupofdonorswithHBVandHCV.Inthisstudy,no differencesinHRQOLwerefoundoncomparingtheHCVand HBVgroupsatthisveryearlystageofthediseasebecauseboth groupsweresubjectedtothesamestressduetouncertainty regardingapossibleinfectiousdisease.

Thechoiceofgenericinstrumentsorspecificinstruments forliverdiseaseintheassessmentoftheHRQOLwasbased onits widespreaduse inBrazil,previous experienceofthe studyinstitutionandtheinstruments’reproducibility.15 Spe-cificinstrumentstoassessHRQOLlinkedtoliverdisease,such astheLiverDiseaseQualityofLifeQuestionnaire,havebeen validated and appliedin this institution.16 However, these instrumentswere notemployedinthis studybecause they couldnotreliablybeappliedtoblooddonorswithoutliver dis-ease.Incontrast,theSF-36isusefuland applicablebothto patientsandtothegeneralpopulation.

In several studies on HRQOLin HCV, the startingpoint waspatientswhohadalreadyreceivedtheirdiagnosis com-paredwithcontrolgroupsindifferentstagesoftheirdisease.17 Theoriginalityofthisevaluationwasits longitudinal char-acterthat wasdesignedtoaddress thepatientsbeforeand afterdiagnoses ofHBVor HCV.Unexpectedly,we observed improvementinfour out ofeightdomains inthe summa-rizedSF-36physicalcomponentscale fromTimePoint1to TimePoint3amongHCV-positivedonors.Thus,incontrast tothe hypothesissuggestedbyGroessl etal.,10 the knowl-edgeofthediagnosisdidnotleadtoworseningoftheHRQOL inpatientswithHCV,but toanimprovement.This percep-tionofimprovedHRQOLwasobtainedbyTimepoint3during clinical care. Theavailability of adequate clinical monitor-ingandacustomizedtreatmentwithdetailedexplanations ofthe evolution and prognosismay be responsible forthe improvementinHQROL.18Infact,atthisstagethemain con-cernsofdonorswereintensivelyaddressed.Theseconcerns includeddoubtsaboutthenaturalhistoryoftheirillness,the availabilityoftreatmentandthepossibilityofreceivingfree medicationand ongoingclinical support.Additionally,HCV andHIVsharemajorroutesoftransmission.Therefore,some ofthepatientswithHCVmayhavefeltrelievedatnotbeing HIVcarriersbecausethelatterisrecognizedasamuchmore stigmatizinginfection.

The lower HRQOL in Time point 1 may be related to HCVcausing fatigueanda reducedsense ofwell-being,as

demonstrated by Forton et al.19 Additionally, studies have linkedthedeclineinHRQOLtothepresenceofthevirusinthe centralnervoussystem.20Inlaterstages(especiallyinTime point3),therewasanimprovementintheHRQOLscoreswhen patientsbegantheirclinicalfollow-up.Thisincreasemaybe associatedwithstressreliefduetoknowingthereal condi-tionoftheirhealth,moredetailedknowledgeregardingHCV infectionandtheavailabilityofantiviraltherapyasmentioned above.Indeed,itwaspreviouslydemonstratedthattherewas adecreaseinHRQOLinpatientswithchronicHCVwhenthe diagnosiswastransmittedbyanunpreparedmedicalstaff.21

IncontrasttoHCV,thelongitudinalanalysisofthegroup diagnosedwithHBVshowednosignificantdifferencesinany ofthedomainsoftheSF-36.Despitetheprospectofa clini-calfollow-up,issuesrelatedtotheseverityofthediseaseand concernsaboutthetransmissionofaserioushealthproblem totheirfamilyandcontactsmayrepresentimportant com-ponents that explain the low HRQOL.22 Moreover, patients withHBVshowedaworseHRQOLthanthefalse-positive con-trolgroup,especiallyduringTimepoint2.ThelowerHRQOL scoresintheHBVgroupandthefalse-positivecontrolgroup canbeattributedtotheinitialstresscausedbythenecessity ofsubmissiontoalaboratoryinvestigationofthesedonors. ThepossibilityofdiagnosisofHIVinfectionmaybeacauseof worryformostindividualswhohavetorepeattheserological tests;thisconcernmaybeassociatedwiththeemergenceof physicalandemotionalsymptoms.Asimilarsituationoccurs amongblooddonorswhoarediagnosedasHIVpositive.Cleary etal.23demonstratedthedevelopmentofsymptomsand emo-tionaldisordersamongHIV-positivedonors.Inourpopulation, the nonspecificcomplaints ofpainand feelingsofmalaise reportedduringthisphasemayhavedecreasedthehealthof theseindividualsasawhole,therebycontributingtothedrop intheirHRQOLscores.

DifferencesfoundinthelongitudinalassessmentofHBV andHCVmayberelatedtothedifferentpossibilitiesofviral clearanceforthesetwoviruses.1Thecurrentratesof elimina-tionofHCVaftertreatmentrangefrom50%to85%ofcases accordingtothevirusgenotype.InchronichepatitisB infec-tion,the chancesofserologicalclearanceofthe viruswith orwithoutcontinuoustreatmentaresmaller(approximately 10–30%ofcases).Therequirementforcontinuouscareand thetherapeuticpossibilityofevolutiontohepatocellular car-cinomaevenbeforetheappearanceofcirrhosisarerelevant concernsthatcanaffecttheHRQOL.24

(7)

groupreducestheimpactofrecallbiasbecausethesedonors weresubjectedtothesamenotification,counseling,retesting, andsystematicinterviewproceduresasthecases.25

Conclusions

The process of notification and counseling can affect the HRQOLamonghealthydonorsandthoseinfectedwithHBV andHCV.IncontrasttoHBVcarriers,thepossibilityof medi-caltreatmentmayimprovetheHRQOLofHCV-positivedonors. StudiesthatprovideabroaderknowledgeofHRQOLamong healthyandinfectedblooddonorscanaidtheimplementation ofpublichealthpoliciesnotonlybyprovidingabroaderand morecomprehensive approachby healthprofessionals but alsobypromotingamoredignifiedandhumanizedapproach totheseindividuals.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1. FocacciaR.TratadodeHepatitesVirais.2nded.SãoPaulo: EditoraAtheneu;2007.

2. deAlmeida-NetoC,SabinoEC,LiuJ,BlatytaPF,

Mendrone-JuniorA,SallesNA,etal.Prevalenceofserologic markersforhepatitisBandCvirusesinBrazilianblood donorsandincidenceandresidualriskoftransfusion transmissionofhepatitisCvirus.Transfusion. 2013;53(4):827–34.

3. MinukG,GutkinA,WongSG,KaitaKD.Patientconcerns regardingchronichepatitisCinfections.ViralHepatol. 2005;12(1):51–7.

4. AlizadehA,RanjbarM,YadollahzadehM.Patientconcerns regardingchronichepatitisBandCinfection.EastMediterr HealthJ.2008;14(5):1142–7.

5. ZantraA,GoodhartD.Qualityoflifeindicators:areviewof theliterature.CommunityMentHealthRev.1979;4(1):3–10. 6. PatrickD,DeyoR.Genericanddiseasespecificmeasuresin assessinghealthstatusandqualityoflife.MedCare.1989;27 3Suppl:S217–32.

7. GotardoDR,StraussE,TeixeiraMC,MachadoMC.Liver transplantationandqualityoflife:relevanceofaspecificliver diseasequestionnaire.LiverInt.2008;28(1):99–106.

8. TeixeiraMC,RibeiroMF,GayottoLC,ChamoneDA,StraussE. Worsequalityoflifeinvolunteerblooddonorswithhepatitis C.Transfusion.2006;46(2):278–83.

9. StraussE,Porto-FerreiraFA,deAlmeida-NetoC,TeixeiraMC. AlteredqualityoflifeintheearlystagesofchronichepatitisC isduetothevirusitself.ClinResHepatolGastroenterol. 2014;38(1):40–5.

10.GroesslEJ,WeingartKR,KaplanRM,ClarkJA,GiffordAL,Ho SB.LivingwithhepatitisC:qualitativeinterviewswith hepatitisC-infectedveterans.JGenInternMed. 2008;23(12):1959–65.

11.KunkelEJ,KimJS,HannHW,OyesanmiO,MenefeeLA,Field HL,etal.DepressioninKoreanimmigrantswithhepatitisB andrelatedliverdiseases.Psychosomatics.2000;41(6):472–80. 12.TanNC,CheahSL,TeoEK,YangLH.Patientswithchronic

hepatitisBinfection:whatistheirqualityoflife?Singapore MedJ.2008;49(9):682–7.

13.McHorneyCA,WareJEJr,RaczekAE.TheMPS36-Item Short-FormHealthSurvey(SF-36):psychometricandclinical testsofvalidityinmeasuringphysicalandmentalhealth constructs.MedCare.1993;31(3):247–63.

14.SallesNA,SabinoEC,BarretoCC,BarretoAM,OtaniMM, ChamoneDA.Thediscardingofbloodunitsandthe prevalenceofinfectiousdiseasesindonorsatthePro-Blood Foundation/BloodCenterofSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,Brazil.Rev PanamSaludPublica.2003;13(2–3):111–6.

15.CiconelliR,FerrazMB,SantosW,MeiraoI.Brazilian

PortugueseversionoftheSF-36.Areliableandvalidqualityof lifeoutcomemeasure.RevBrasReumatol.1999;39(3):143–50. 16.TeixeiraM,StraussE.Tolltoevaluatequalityoflifein

patientswithliverdiseasesLDQOL1.0(LiverDiseaseQuality ofLife)TranslationandadaptationintoPortugueselanguage. GED.2004;23(6):255–9.

17.CarithersRLJr,SuganoD,BaylissM.Healthassessmentfor chronicHCVinfection:resultsofqualityoflife.DigDisSci. 1996;4112Suppl:75S–80S.

18.Brasil.ConsensosobrecondutasnashepatitesviraisBeC -SãoPaulo-SP26e27deagostode2005.S.B.Hepatologia, Editor.27ago;2005.

19.FortonDM,Taylor-RobinsonSD,ThomasHC.Cerebral dysfunctioninchronichepatitisCinfection.JViralHepat. 2003;10(2):81–6.

20.FortonDM,ThomasHC,MurphyCA,AllopJM,FosterGR,Main J,etal.HepatitisCandcognitiveimpairmentinacohortof patientswithmildliverdisease.Hepatology.2002;35(2):433–9. 21.WeissenbornK,EnnemJC,BokemeyerM,AhlB,WusterU,

TrebstC,etal.Monoaminergicneurotransmissionisaltered inhepatitisCvirusinfectedpatientswithchronicfatigueand cognitiveimpairment.Gut.2006;55(11):1624–30.

22.AtesciFC,CetinBC,OquzhanogluNK,KaradaqF,TurqutH. PsychiatricdisordersandfunctioninginhepatitisBvirus carriers.Psychosomatics.2005;46(2):142–7.

23.ClearyPD,VanDevanterN,RogersTF,SingerE,Shipton-Levy R,SteilenM,etal.Depressivesymptomsinblooddonors notifiedofHIVinfection.AmJPublicHealth.1993;83(4): 534–9.

24.LevyAR,KowdleyKV,IlojeU,TafesseE,MukherieeJ,GishR, etal.TheimpactofchronichepatitisBonqualityoflife:a multinationalstudyofutilitiesfrominfectedanduninfected persons.ValueHealth.2008;11(3):527–38.

Imagem

Figure 1 – Study flow chart.
Table 2 – Scores for the different domains and components of the Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) during the longitudinal analysis of donors with hepatitis B ( n = 32).
Table 3 – Scores for the different domains and components of the Medical Outcome Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) during the longitudinal analysis of donors with hepatitis C (n = 35).

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Sequential monitoring of MRD using more sensitive and specific techniques, such as quantitative real-time poly- merase chain reaction (RQ-PCR) for immunoglobulin ( Ig ) and

1 The aims of these stages are numer- ous but include improving donor awareness and trust in the blood transfusion service, encouragement to adhere to the donor selection

Clostridium difficile infection after adult autologous stem cell transplantation: a multicenter study of epidemiology and risk factors. Biol Blood

Figure 3 – Leukemia-free survival according to minimal residual disease based on real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction at the end of induction in 44 children with

Clostridium difficile infection in allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients is associated with severe graft-versus-host disease and non-relapse mortality. Bone

Therefore, this study does not support data published for patients without neutropenia; the CD64 index was not able to predict positive blood culture results in this specific

Intravenous iron sucrose versus oral iron supplementation for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease – a randomized, controlled,

positive precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia with positive minimal residual disease (0.32%) before conditioning treatment for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation..