• Nenhum resultado encontrado

J. Braz. Chem. Soc. vol.23 número11

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "J. Braz. Chem. Soc. vol.23 número11"

Copied!
1
0
0

Texto

(1)

A

d

Additions and Corrections

J. Braz. Chem. Soc., Vol. 23, No. 11, 2130, 2012. Printed in Brazil - ©2012 Sociedade Brasileira de Química 0103 - 5053 $6.00+0.00

*e-mail: yumilton@yahoo.com.br

Vol. 23, No. 10, 1933-1939, 2012.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0103-50532012005000065

Page 1933, line 5: Inclusion of an author

Dalglish G. de Oliveira,a Cecília M. C. de Almeida,a Consuelo Y. Y. e Silva,a Mara S. P. Arruda,a

Alberto C. Arruda,a Dielly C. F. Lopes,b Elizabeth S. Yamada,b Edmar T. da Costa,b

Arnaldo Jorge M. Filhob and Milton N. da Silva*,a

Flavonoids from the Leaves of

Deguelia utilis

(Leguminosae):

Structural Elucidation and Neuroprotective Properties

Dalglish G. de Oliveira,a Cecília M. C. de Almeida,a Consuelo Y. Y. e Silva,a Mara S. P. Arruda,a

Alberto C. Arruda,a Dielly C. F. Lopes,b Elizabeth S. Yamada,b Edmar T. da Costab and Milton N. da Silva*,a

aLaboratório de Cromatografia Líquida, Universidade Federal do Pará,

Rua Augusto Corrêa, 01, Guamá, 66075-110 Belém-PA, Brazil

bLaboratório de Neuropatologia Experimental, Hospital Universitário Barros Barreto,

Referências

Documentos relacionados

the binding process and to distinguish the binding modes is the combination of absorption spectroscopy detecting the total concentration of adsorbed on DNA molecules and

The structural characterization of the compounds isolated was established based on infrared spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, one- and two-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance,

For example, the higher concentration of coprostanol in the Summer sampling at stations Ig12 and Ig13 (Table 1), located in the secondary channels of the Iguaçu River, suggests

In this work, quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models using multiple linear regression (MLR) and support vector machine (SVM) methods were setup to excavate

All inhibitors were subsequently docked into the binding site obtained from the receptor and conformation of the inhibitors with the lowest binding free energy was used to

On the other hand, the CORCONDIA values obtained from PARAFAC calculations upon varying the number of components for these two regions show that the optimal number of components

However, considering there are no markers (e.g., specific metabolites) to indicate the route of administration used by the athlete, the concentration of the glucocorticosteroids

The results obtained by the CUS-CPE method were compared with four different systems (DC-193-nonanoic acid, DC-193-sodium sulfate, DC-193-lauric acid and the classic Triton X-100