• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. ortop. vol.50 número1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. ortop. vol.50 número1"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texto

(1)

w w w . r b o . o r g . b r

Original

article

Total

hip

arthroplasty

using

a

posterior

minimally

invasive

approach

results

after

six

years

José

Ricardo

Negreiros

Vicente

,

Helder

Souza

Miyahara,

Carlos

Malheiros

Luzo,

Henrique

Melo

Gurgel,

Alberto

Tesconi

Croci

InstitutodeOrtopediaeTraumatologia,HospitaldasClínicas,FaculdadedeMedicina,UniversidadedeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received16October2013 Accepted20February2014 Availableonline31December2014

Keywords:

Hiposteoarthritis Hiparthroplasty

Minimallyinvasivesurgical procedures

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Objective:Toevaluatethemedium-termclinical–functionalresults(minimumfollow-upof sixyears)fromtotaluncementedhiparthroplastyperformedbymeansofaposterior min-imallyinvasiveaccess,incomparisonwiththetraditionalrightlateralaccess.

Methods:Inacomparativeprospectivestudy,224adultpatientsunderwentelectivetotal hiparthroplastyduetoadiagnosisofprimaryorsecondaryosteoarthrosis.Agroupof103 patientswithposteriorminimallyinvasiveaccesswascomparedwithagroupof121patients withthetraditionalrightlateralaccess.Themeanlengthoffollow-upamongthepatients ofthissamplewas7.2years.Weevaluatedtheclinical–functionalandradiographicresults andoccurrencesofloosening,alongwithanycomplicationsthatoccurred,withaminimum follow-upofsixyears.

Results:Theclinical–functionalanalysesbeforethesurgicalprocedureandsixyears after-wardsweresimilarinthetwogroups(p=0.88andp=0.55).Onepatientintheminimally invasivegroupunderwentrevisionoftheacetabularcomponentandtwopatientsinthe con-trolgroupunderwentthesameprocedure(p=0.46).TheTrendelenburgclinicaltest,which showedweaknessofthehipabductormusculature,waspresentinfivepatientsoperated usingthetraditionallateralrouteandabsentinallthosewhounderwenttheminimally invasiveprocedure(p=0.06).Therewasnodifferenceregardingtheradiographicparameters obtained,eitherinacetabularorinfemoralpositioning(p=0.32andp=0.58).

Conclusions: Themedium-termclinicalandradiographicresultsandthecomplicationrates weresimilarbetweenthepatientswhounderwenttotalhiparthroplastybymeansofthe posteriorminimallyinvasiveaccessandthosewiththetraditionallateralaccess.

©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora Ltda.Allrightsreserved.

WorkdevelopedbytheHipGroupoftheInstituteofOrthopedicsandTraumatology,UniversityofSãoPauloMedicalSchool,SãoPaulo, SP,Brazil.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:rrnegreiros@gmail.com(J.R.N.Vicente). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2014.12.005

(2)

Artroplastia

total

do

quadril

feita

por

via

posterior

minimamente

invasiva

Resultados

após

seis

anos

Palavras-chave:

Osteoartritedoquadril Artroplastiadequadril Procedimentoscirúrgicos minimamenteinvasivos

r

e

s

u

m

o

Objetivo: Avaliaroresultadoclínico-funcionalemmédioprazo(seguimentomínimodeseis anos)daartroplastiatotaldoquadrilnãocimentadafeitaporacessominimamenteinvasivo (MIS)posteriorcomparadoaoacessolateraldireto(LD)tradicional.

Métodos: Emumestudocomparativoprospectivo,224pacientesadultosforamsubmetidos àartroplastiatotaldoquadrilemcarátereletivo,pordiagnósticodeosteoartroseprimária ousecundária,esecomparouogrupoMISposterior(103pacientes)comogrupoacessoLD tradicional(121).Amédiadetempodeseguimentodospacientesdaamostrafoi7,2anos. Avaliamososresultadosclínico-funcionaiseradiográficoseaocorrênciadesolturas,assim comocomplicac¸õesocorridascomumseguimentomínimodeseisanos.

Resultados: Aanáliseclínico-funcionalanteseseisanosapósoprocedimentocirúrgicofoi semelhantenosdoisgrupos(p=0,88ep=0,55).UmpacientedogrupoMISfoisubmetidoà revisãodocomponenteacetabularedoisdogrupocontroleforamsubmetidosaomesmo procedimento,p=0,46.OtesteclínicodeTrendelenburg,queevidenciouumafraquezada musculaturaabdutoradoquadril,estavapresenteemcincopacientesoperadospelavia lateraltradicionaleausenteemtodosossubmetidosaoMIS(p=0,06).Nãohouvediferenc¸a quantoaosparâmetrosradiográficosobtidostantodoposicionamentoacetabularquanto dofemoral(p=0,32,p=0,58).

Conclusões:Osresultadosemmédioprazo,clínicoseradiográficos,eataxadecomplicac¸ões foramsemelhantesentreospacientessubmetidosàartroplastiatotaldoquadrilpeloacesso posteriorminimamenteinvasivoepelavialateraltradicional.

©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevier EditoraLtda.Todososdireitosreservados.

Introduction

Totalhip arthroplasty performedby means ofaminimally

invasive accessemerged because ofthe trend observed in

other fields of surgery. It had the aims of ensuring better results,fewercomplications,lessperioperativemorbidityand alowercostburdenforpublicandprivatehealthcareservice providers.1,2

Several studies have shown that a minimally invasive

accesscanleadtobetterrecoveryintheimmediate postop-erativeperiod,withlesspain,lessbleedingduringthehospital stay,less muscleinjuryand,consequently,shorterhospital stay.3–5

However, in comparing traditional and minimally

inva-sive surgical accesses, other authors have shown similar

short-termresults,withoutanyrealbenefit.6,7Someauthors

have even warned of higher complication rates and risks

with some minimally invasive accesses, such as a single

anterior access, and have reported unusual complications

andprolongeddurationofsurgery,alongwithlonglearning curves.8,9

Our objective here was toassess the clinical and

func-tionalresultsoverthemediumterm(minimumfollow-upof

sixyears)andthecomplicationsfromuncementedtotalhip

arthroplasty performedby means ofaposterior minimally

invasiveaccess,incomparisonwithatraditionalrightlateral access.

Material

and

methods

Afterobtainingapprovalfromourinstitution’sresearchethics

committee,aprospectivecomparativestudywasconducted

in which 224 adult patients underwent elective total hip

arthroplasty due to a diagnosis of primary or secondary

osteoarthrosis.Thepatientswereselectedfromthewaiting listofourhospital’sHipGroup.

ThesamplesaredescribedinTable1.

Randomizationwasperformedbymeansofasequenceof

randomnumbers,withdivisionintotwogroupsatthetime

ofmakingthesurgicalappointments.Thiswasdonebya sur-geonwhowasnotdirectlyinvolvedinthisstudy,withoutthe knowledgeofthesurgeonwhowasthefirstauthor.Inthefirst group,theposterioraccessfirstdescribedbyMoorewasused, withsmall-sizedincisionsandminimaldissectionofsoft tis-sues.Inthepatientsofthecontrolgroup,thetraditionalright

Table1–Sampleparameter.

Minimally invasivegroup

Controlgroup pvalue

(3)

lateralaccessroutefirstdescribedbyHardingerwasused,but withthepatientinlateraldecubitus.Therewere103patients intheminimallyinvasiveaccessgroupand121intheright lateralaccessgroup.

Themeanlengthoffollow-upforthewholesamplewas7.2 years,witharangefrom6.1to9years.

Thecriteriafornon-inclusioncomprisedpresentationof anytypeofcoagulopathy,systemicarterialhypertensionthat wasnotunderpharmacologicalcontrol,previoushipsurgery orsequelaefromcongenitalhipdysplasiaofCrowetypes2,3 or4thatrequiredstructuralgraftingintheacetabularroof.

Theexclusion criterion was loss offollow-up occurring beforethetimeoftheoutpatientassessmentinthesixthyear aftertheoperation.

Allthepatientsfollowedthesameprotocolfor postopera-tiveanalgesia,whichconsistedof100mgoftramadol(Pfizer®)

intravenously every eight hours and 100mg of ketoprofen

(Eurofarma®)inasingleintravenousdosedailyuntilthedayof

hospitaldischarge.Thromboembolicprophylaxiswas admin-isteredtoallthepatients,consistingof40mgofenoxaparin appliedsubcutaneously(Sanofi-Aventis®),startingonthefirst

dayaftertheoperationandcontinuinguntilthe30thday. All the patients were discharged on the fifth day after theoperationandweregivenguidanceregarding physiother-apyandanticoagulantandanalgesicmedications(500mgof paracetamolorallyeverysixhours,ifnecessary).

Inthisstudy,weusedtwomodelsofuncemented prosthe-sis(MeridianfemoralnailwithVitalock-Stryker®acetabulum

and Bicontact femoral nail with Aesculap® Plasmacup®

acetabulum). The choice between these two implants was

basedmerelyontheiravailabilityonthe dayonwhichthe patientwasoperated.Bothofthesemanufacturerswere sup-plierstoourhipsurgeryserviceatthetimeofthisstudy.

All the patients inthe minimally invasive accessgroup wereoperatedbythefirstauthorofthisstudyandthepatients intherightlateralaccessgroupwereoperatedbythree sur-geons,amongwhomwasthefirstauthor.

Somepointsrelatingtothe posteriorminimallyinvasive accessneedtobehighlighted.Thisisanaccessroutethat impliesagentle learningcurve,evenforsurgeonswho are accustomedto thetraditional posterioraccess. The princi-pleofthemovingwindowmaybeofgreatvaluewithregard toacetabularand femoralaccess:the positionofthe spac-ersshouldbechangedaccordingtotheregiontobeprepared, withsoft-tissuedisplacementdistallyforpreparationofthe acetabulumandproximallyforpreparationofthefemur,soas toavoidgreattensioningofthesurfacetissuesandminimize theriskofscarcomplicationsatthesurgicalincision.

The physiotherapy protocol used consisted of assisted

activeflexionoftheanklesandkneesusinganabductionpad, startingonthefirstpostoperativeday;andgaittrainingwith partialweight-bearingstartingonthesecond day,withfull loadappliedsixweeksaftertheoperation.Eachpatient’s evo-lutionwasfollowedupbymeansofreturnvisitsscheduledto takeplaceone,three,six,12and24weeksaftertheoperation. Thereturnvisitsbecameannualafterthefirstpostoperative year.

A clinical–functional assessment was made and the

radiographic criteria were also analyzed in both groups.

Fortheclinical–functionalassessment,theHarrisHipScore

questionnairewasusedbeforetheoperation(duringtheweek precedingthesurgery),sixmonthsandoneyearafterwards and,finally,sixyearsafterthesurgery.Sixyearsoffollow-up

was consideredtobethe minimumlengthoftime forthis

criterioninthepresentstudy.

Possiblelate complicationsand asepticloosening ofthe prostheticcomponentsamongthepatientsofthisstudywere evaluatedaftersixyearsoffollow-up.

Aradiographicassessmentwasmadeatthereturnvisitsix monthsaftertheoperation.Theacetabularpositioningwas consideredtobegoodiftheabductionangleofthe acetabu-lumwasbetween35◦ and50.Thefemoralpositioningwas

consideredtobegoodifthefemoralcomponentspresented

between0◦and5ofvalgus.

PresenceorabsenceoftheTrendelenburgclinicalsignwas measuredatthereturnvisitsixyearsaftertheoperation.

Thelinearradiographicwearpresentedbythepolyethylene wasmeasuredusingacompassandrulermarkedin millime-tersatthesixth-yearfollow-up.Thevariationinthicknessof

thepolyethylenebetweentheupperandlowerportionswas

evaluatedbasedonthesphericityoftheprosthetichead.We consideredthatthewearwasunacceptableifitwas≥1mm,

whichwouldrepresentmorethan0.1mmoflinearwearper

year, given the length of follow-up of the patients in our study.10

Quantitative variables with Gaussian distribution were comparedusingthenon-pairedStudentttest.Datathatdid notpresentnormaldistributionwereevaluatedbymeansof

nonparametric tests.Comparisonsbetweenthe twogroups

were madeusingtheMann–Whitneytest.Qualitative

(non-numerical)datawereanalyzedusingthechi-squaretest,or theFishertestwhennecessary.Thelevelofstatistical signifi-cancewassetatp=0.05.

Results

Regardingtheprosthesismodelsused,theMeridian/Vitalock (Stryker®)implantwasmoreprevalentinbothgroupsthanthe

Bicontact/Plasmacup(Aesculap®),butwithoutanysignificant

difference(60.2%versus53.7%;p=0.34).

Adiagnosisofprimaryhiposteoarthrosiswasmadein61 patientsoftherightlateralgroup(50.4%)and57ofthe mini-mallyinvasivegroup(55.3%),withp=0.5.Alltheotherpatients werediagnosedwithosteoarthrosissecondarytoother patho-logicalconditions,whichincludedosteonecrosis,seronegative

arthritis, sequelae from Pèrthes disease, sequelae from a

slipped epiphysis, rheumatoid arthritis and post-traumatic hiparthritis.

Thelinearradiographicwearofthepolyethylenewas mea-suredusingacompassandrulermarkedinmillimetersatthe sixth-yearfollow-up.Agreaterdegreeofwearthanexpected (>1mm)wasobservedin30%ofthepatientsintheminimally invasivegroup,versus33.8%ofthecontrols,withp=0.56.

Intheminimallyinvasivegroup,noacetabularorfemoral osteolysiswasidentifiedinanyofthepatientsfromthesixth

year onwards. However,osteolysis was diagnosed in three

(4)

In relation to the acetabular and femoral positioning amongthepatientswithaminimallyinvasiveaccess,

unsa-tisfactory results were noted in 5.8% of the acetabular

components and in4.8%of the femoralnails.In

compari-son,inthe controlgroup,therewere unsatisfactoryresults in9.9%oftheacetabularcomponentsand7.4%ofthefemoral components,withpvaluesof0.32and0.58,respectively.

TheTrendelenburg clinical test, which shows weakness

oftheabductormusculatureofthehip,waspositiveinfive patientswhowereoperatedbymeansofthetraditionallateral

approachbut wasabsentfrom all thepatients who

under-wentsurgerybymeansoftheposteriorminimally invasive

access,althoughtherewasnostatisticallysignificant differ-ence(p=0.06).

The clinical–functional assessments in the two groups

beforethesurgeryweresimilar(meanof47.5intheminimally invasivegroupand48inthecontrolgroup)(p=0.88).

TheHarrisHipScoreaftertheoperationshowedthatthere hadbeenanimprovementinbothgroups,withsimilarmean scores(86intherightlateralgroupversus87.6inthe mini-mallyinvasivegroup;p=0.55).

Asepticacetabularlooseningoccurredinonepatient,who hadbeenoperatedbymeansoftheminimallyinvasive pos-terioraccess.Thiscaseunderwentrevision12monthsafter theinitialsurgery.Revisionoftheprosthesiswasnecessary intwoofthepatientsinthecontrolgroup:thepolyethylene inonepatientwasexchangedafter6.5yearsoffollow-upand acetabularrevisionwasperformedinanotherpatientofthis groupaftersevenyears(p=0.46).

Theonlystatisticallysignificantresultwasthesizeofthe incision(p<0.001),withameanof95.1mmfortheminimally invasiveaccessand169.8mmforthetraditionallateralaccess (Fig.1).

Regarding complications, there were two cases in the

minimallyinvasivegroup:oneofmedialacetabular fractur-ingwithoutdisplacement,whichwastreatedconservatively; andoneofheterotopicossification,whichrequiredsurgical resection.Inthecontrolgroup,thereweretwocasesoffemoral fractures,whichweretreatedbymeansofcerclageduringthe samesurgicalprocedure;onecaseofdislocation,whichwas treatedbymeansofclosedreduction,withoutrecurrence;one caseofsuperficialinfection,whichwastreatedbymeansof oralantibiotictherapy; andone caseofneuropraxiaofthe ulnarnervecausedbythepositioningonthesurgicaltable, whichregressedaftereightweeks.Nosignificantdifference wasobservedbetweenthegroups(p=0.45).

Discussion

Inourstudy,wenotedthatthemeanageofourpatientswas lower than seen instudies in the literature,which mostly showedmean ages greater than 60years.2,11 This can

per-hapsbeexplainedbytheconsiderablenumbers ofcasesof

osteoarthrosis secondary to systemic and rheumatological

diseasesthatwereobservedinoursetting(almosthalfofour patients).Anotherpossiblecauseforthisfindingwasperhaps thetypicalpyramidalagedistributionoftheBrazilian popula-tion,whichdiffersfromthatofEuropeanorNorthAmerican

countries. Thislower mean age may representa sourceof

Fig.1–Scarof5.5cmsixmonthsaftertheoperation.

bias,bothtowardbetterrecoveryfromtheacute postopera-tivephaseandtowardthecomplicationsinherenttowearand looseningofthearthroplasty,giventhatthesepatients theo-reticallyhaveahigherdegreeofphysicalandworkactivity.

Otherpossiblesourcesofbiasintheresultsobtainedinthe presentstudyincludethefactthattwoprosthesismodelswere usedinbothgroups,althoughbothmodelswereuncemented. However,mostofthestudieswithlargesampleshavetended topresent thissame bias.Regardingthe controlgroup,the factthattheprocedureswereperformedbydifferentsurgeons mightalsobeconsideredtobeasourceofbias,although diver-sityofsurgeonshasalsobeenreportedbyagoodproportion ofpreviousauthors.

Theuseofprostheseswithatribologicalpairconsistingof aconventionalpolyethyleneinsertandametalhead,together withthepatients’lowerageandconsequentlyhigherlevelof activity,mayhavebeenresponsibleforthelinearweargreater thanexpectedthatwasfoundinone-thirdofthecases,and for theearly acetabularosteolysisthat was foundinthree patientsofthecontrolgroup.However,weemphasizethatthe methodologyusedformeasuringthewearofthepolyethylene presentsamarginoferrorofaround15%.Methodsofgreater precisionsuchascomputerizedthree-dimensionalmodelsare usedtoday,butthesewerenottakenintoconsiderationinthe

present studybecausetheydidnotformtheauthors’main

objective.

(5)

Fig.2–Straightacetabularimpactor,whichmightmakeit difficulttopositionthecomponent.

(>52)tendtopresentgreatertechnicaldifficultyforsurgeons, withahigherriskoflateralizationandgreaterabductionangle fortheacetabularcomponent.Thisresultsfromtheangleof attackoftheacetabularreamer,whichisharmfulparticularly

whenreamers and impactors that are adaptedforsmaller

accessesarenotused(Fig.2).12

Weaknessoftheabductormusculature,asrepresentedbya positiveTrendelenburgtest,wasonlyfoundinpatientsinthe groupoperatedbymeansofalateralaccess.Thisresultwas notsignificant(p=0.06).Kinematicgaitstudieshaveproven thatbetterresultsare obtainedwhentheaccessuseddoes notinterferedirectlywiththeintegrityofthismusculature.13

Most studies have shown that the acute postoperative

recoveryisbetterwhenaminimallyinvasiveaccessisused, withlessbleeding,lowermuscledamageandshorter hospi-talstay.Thequestionofbleedingduringthehospitalstayis anotherpolemicalpointbecausealthoughmostauthorshave reportedmeanvolumesofbleedingof500mL,2,3,14,15the inci-denceoftransfusionsamongthepatientsiscloseto50%.This denotesa contradictionand a likelyunderestimate, which

has been confirmed by other studies in which the central

scopewasbloodvolumelossandthemethodologywasmore

detailedforsuchestimates.5,16,17

Our study, with a follow-up of more than six years,

presented results similar to data in the literature on this

topic, as demonstrated in a recent meta-analysis, which

showed similar evolution inthe two groups, both in rela-tion to the radiographicparameters and in relation tothe clinical–functionalscore ofthe Harris HipScore, atall the timesevaluated.However,themediumandlong-term follow-upseemstobeuncertainandinconclusive,giventhescarcity ofcomparativestudieswithlongerfollow-ups,andthereisno evidencesofarregardingthesuperiorityoftheseaccessesin relationtothetraditionalroutes.18

Overall,inthewholesample,weonlyobservedonecaseof dislocation.Webelievethatthislowincidencewasduetothe intensiveworkconductedbythephysiotherapyteamofour service,inwhichposturaleducationalmeasureswere imple-mentedtodiminishtheriskofthiscomplication.Moreover,in

ourstudy,wewereonlydealingwithpatientswithadiagnosis ofosteoarthrosis.Itiswellknownthatthesepatientspresent lowerriskthandopatientswithadiagnosisoffracturingof thefemoralneckwhoundergototalhiparthroplasty.

Wechosetoevaluateoveralloccurrencesofcomplications pergroup,inacomparativemanner,becausethesamplesize wouldbeinsufficientforustoevaluateeachcomparisonin detailaccordingtoeachtypeofcomplicationthatoccurred.

Theonlyvariableevaluated inthis study thatshoweda significant differencefortheminimally invasiveaccess,i.e. thesmaller-sizedincision,theoreticallywouldindicate that the estheticresultwouldbe better.However,in2005, Mow etal.19demonstratedworsescarringresultsfromsmall inci-sions.Inoursample,therewerenoestheticcomplaints,but itneedstobeborneinmindthatthisshouldbelastcriterion forindicatingalessinvasiveaccess.

Conclusion

Themedium-termclinicalandradiographicresultsandthe

complication rate are similar forpatients undergoing total hiparthroplastybymeansofaposteriorminimallyinvasive access and by means of the traditionalright lateral route.

However, the right lateral access more frequently causes

insufficiencyoftheabductormusculature,inrelationtothe posteriorminimallyinvasiveaccess.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1.WenzJF,GurkanI,JibodhSR.Mini-incisiontotalhip arthroplasty:acomparativeassessmentofperioperative outcomes.Orthopedics.2002;25(10):1031–43.

2.GoldsteinWM,BransonJJ,BerlandKA,GordonAC.

Minimal-incisiontotalhiparthroplasty.JBoneJointSurgAm. 2003;85Suppl.4:33–8.

3.MattaJM,ShahrdarC,FergusonT.Single-incisionanterior approachfortotalhiparthroplastyonanorthopaedictable. ClinOrthopRelatRes.2005;441:115–24.

4.BergerRA.Totalhiparthroplastyusingtheminimally invasivetwo-incisionapproach.ClinOrthopRelatRes. 2003;(417):232–41.

5.VicenteJR,CrociAT,CamargoOP.Bloodlossintheminimally invasiveposteriorapproachtototalhiparthroplasty:a comparativestudy.Clinics.2008;63(3):351–6[SaoPaulo]. 6.DeBeerJ,PetruccelliD,ZalzalP,WinemakerMJ.

Single-incision,minimallyinvasivetotalhiparthroplasty: lengthdoesn’tmatter.JArthroplasty.2004;19(8):945–50. 7.OgondaL,WilsonR,ArchboldP,LawlorM,HumphreysP,

O’BrienS,etal.Minimal-incisiontechniqueintotalhip arthroplastydoesnotimproveearlypostoperativeoutcomes. Aprospective,randomized,controlledtrial.JBoneJointSurg Am.2005;87(4):701–10.

(6)

9. BalBS,HaltomD,AletoT,BarretM.Earlycomplicationsof primarytotalhipreplacementperformedwithatwo-incision minimallyinvasivetechnique.JBoneJointSurgAm.

2005;87(11):2432–8.

10.GriffithMJ,SeidensteinMK,WilliamsD,CharnleyJ.Socket wearinlowfrictionarthroplastyofthehip.ClinOrthopRelat Res.1978;(137):37–47.

11.SwansonTV.Earlyresultsof1000consecutive,posterior, single-incisionminimallyinvasivesurgerytotalhip arthroplasties.JArthroplasty.2005;20(Suppl3):26–32. 12.VicenteJR,CrociAT,CamargoOP.Restaurac¸ãodocentrode

rotac¸ãonaartroplastiatotaldoquadrilminimamente invasiva.ActaOrtopBras.2009;17(2):14–7.

13.RitterMA,HartyLD,KeatingME,FarisPM,MedingJB.A clinicalcomparisonoftheanterolateralandposterolateral approachestothehip.ClinOrthopRelatRes.2001;(385):95–9. 14.ChimentoGF,PavoneV,SharrockN,KahnB,CahillJ,Sculco

TP.Minimallyinvasivetotalhiparthroplasty.Aprospective randomizedstudy.JArthroplasty.2005;20(2):139–44.

15.WrightJM,CrockettHC,DelgadoS,LymanS,MadsenM, SculcoTP.Mini-incisionfortotalhiparthroplasty.A prospective,controlledinvestigationwith5-yearfollow-up evaluation.JArthroplasty.2004;19(5):538–45.

16.RosencherN,KerkkampHEM,MacherasG,MunueraLM, MenichellaG,BartonDM,etal.Orthopedicsurgery

transfusionhemoglobinEuropeanoverview(OSTHEO)study: bloodmanagementinelectivekneeandhiparthroplastyin Europe.Transfusion.2003;43(4):459–69[Paris].

17.PiersonJL,HannonTJ,EarlesDR.Ablood-conservation algorithmtoreducebloodtransfusionaftertotalhipand kneearthroplasty.JBoneJointSurgAm.2004;86(7):1512–8. 18.MoskalJT,CappsSG.Islimitedincisionbetterthanstandard

totalhiparthroplasty?Ameta-analysis.ClinOrthopRelat Res.2013;471(4):1283–94.

19.MowCS,WoolsonST,NgarmukosS,ParkEH,LorenzPH. Comparisonofscarsfromtotalhipreplacementsdonewitha standardoramini-incision.ClinOrthopRelatRes.

Imagem

Table 1 – Sample parameter.
Fig. 1 – Scar of 5.5 cm six months after the operation.
Fig. 2 – Straight acetabular impactor, which might make it difficult to position the component.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term results from MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation, by means of a technique using a

This was a retrospective case series. Patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with a minimum of two years of clinical follow-up, were assessed. The study comprised

No caso em estudo, a perda de solo estimada para a condição de incêndio é cerca de 50 vezes superior à da condição de cobertura florestal ante- rior ao incêndio, e a

Portanto, como resultado das ações extensionistas analisadas, evidencia-se, por meio dos projetos de extensão realizados, que apresentam indícios de possuírem

Taking into account thermal changes and magnetic saturation by introducing some constraints, a dimensional analysis was used to compare a non-regular topology with a

Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossiication of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow-up. Hale JJ, Gruson KI,

Foi elaborado um banco de dados de projetos com determinadas características subjetivas, resultado da consulta feita a especialistas (engenheiros, arquitetos e