• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. ortop. vol.50 número1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. ortop. vol.50 número1"

Copied!
6
0
0

Texto

(1)

w w w . r b o . o r g . b r

Original

article

Total

hip

arthroplasty

using

a

posterior

minimally

invasive

approach

results

after

six

years

José

Ricardo

Negreiros

Vicente

,

Helder

Souza

Miyahara,

Carlos

Malheiros

Luzo,

Henrique

Melo

Gurgel,

Alberto

Tesconi

Croci

InstitutodeOrtopediaeTraumatologia,HospitaldasClínicas,FaculdadedeMedicina,UniversidadedeSãoPaulo,SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received16October2013 Accepted20February2014 Availableonline31December2014

Keywords:

Hiposteoarthritis Hiparthroplasty

Minimallyinvasivesurgical procedures

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Objective:Toevaluatethemedium-termclinical–functionalresults(minimumfollow-upof sixyears)fromtotaluncementedhiparthroplastyperformedbymeansofaposterior min-imallyinvasiveaccess,incomparisonwiththetraditionalrightlateralaccess.

Methods:Inacomparativeprospectivestudy,224adultpatientsunderwentelectivetotal hiparthroplastyduetoadiagnosisofprimaryorsecondaryosteoarthrosis.Agroupof103 patientswithposteriorminimallyinvasiveaccesswascomparedwithagroupof121patients withthetraditionalrightlateralaccess.Themeanlengthoffollow-upamongthepatients ofthissamplewas7.2years.Weevaluatedtheclinical–functionalandradiographicresults andoccurrencesofloosening,alongwithanycomplicationsthatoccurred,withaminimum follow-upofsixyears.

Results:Theclinical–functionalanalysesbeforethesurgicalprocedureandsixyears after-wardsweresimilarinthetwogroups(p=0.88andp=0.55).Onepatientintheminimally invasivegroupunderwentrevisionoftheacetabularcomponentandtwopatientsinthe con-trolgroupunderwentthesameprocedure(p=0.46).TheTrendelenburgclinicaltest,which showedweaknessofthehipabductormusculature,waspresentinfivepatientsoperated usingthetraditionallateralrouteandabsentinallthosewhounderwenttheminimally invasiveprocedure(p=0.06).Therewasnodifferenceregardingtheradiographicparameters obtained,eitherinacetabularorinfemoralpositioning(p=0.32andp=0.58).

Conclusions: Themedium-termclinicalandradiographicresultsandthecomplicationrates weresimilarbetweenthepatientswhounderwenttotalhiparthroplastybymeansofthe posteriorminimallyinvasiveaccessandthosewiththetraditionallateralaccess.

©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora Ltda.Allrightsreserved.

WorkdevelopedbytheHipGroupoftheInstituteofOrthopedicsandTraumatology,UniversityofSãoPauloMedicalSchool,SãoPaulo, SP,Brazil.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:[email protected](J.R.N.Vicente). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2014.12.005

(2)

Artroplastia

total

do

quadril

feita

por

via

posterior

minimamente

invasiva

Resultados

após

seis

anos

Palavras-chave:

Osteoartritedoquadril Artroplastiadequadril Procedimentoscirúrgicos minimamenteinvasivos

r

e

s

u

m

o

Objetivo: Avaliaroresultadoclínico-funcionalemmédioprazo(seguimentomínimodeseis anos)daartroplastiatotaldoquadrilnãocimentadafeitaporacessominimamenteinvasivo (MIS)posteriorcomparadoaoacessolateraldireto(LD)tradicional.

Métodos: Emumestudocomparativoprospectivo,224pacientesadultosforamsubmetidos àartroplastiatotaldoquadrilemcarátereletivo,pordiagnósticodeosteoartroseprimária ousecundária,esecomparouogrupoMISposterior(103pacientes)comogrupoacessoLD tradicional(121).Amédiadetempodeseguimentodospacientesdaamostrafoi7,2anos. Avaliamososresultadosclínico-funcionaiseradiográficoseaocorrênciadesolturas,assim comocomplicac¸õesocorridascomumseguimentomínimodeseisanos.

Resultados: Aanáliseclínico-funcionalanteseseisanosapósoprocedimentocirúrgicofoi semelhantenosdoisgrupos(p=0,88ep=0,55).UmpacientedogrupoMISfoisubmetidoà revisãodocomponenteacetabularedoisdogrupocontroleforamsubmetidosaomesmo procedimento,p=0,46.OtesteclínicodeTrendelenburg,queevidenciouumafraquezada musculaturaabdutoradoquadril,estavapresenteemcincopacientesoperadospelavia lateraltradicionaleausenteemtodosossubmetidosaoMIS(p=0,06).Nãohouvediferenc¸a quantoaosparâmetrosradiográficosobtidostantodoposicionamentoacetabularquanto dofemoral(p=0,32,p=0,58).

Conclusões:Osresultadosemmédioprazo,clínicoseradiográficos,eataxadecomplicac¸ões foramsemelhantesentreospacientessubmetidosàartroplastiatotaldoquadrilpeloacesso posteriorminimamenteinvasivoepelavialateraltradicional.

©2014SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevier EditoraLtda.Todososdireitosreservados.

Introduction

Totalhip arthroplasty performedby means ofaminimally

invasive accessemerged because ofthe trend observed in

other fields of surgery. It had the aims of ensuring better results,fewercomplications,lessperioperativemorbidityand alowercostburdenforpublicandprivatehealthcareservice providers.1,2

Several studies have shown that a minimally invasive

accesscanleadtobetterrecoveryintheimmediate postop-erativeperiod,withlesspain,lessbleedingduringthehospital stay,less muscleinjuryand,consequently,shorterhospital stay.3–5

However, in comparing traditional and minimally

inva-sive surgical accesses, other authors have shown similar

short-termresults,withoutanyrealbenefit.6,7Someauthors

have even warned of higher complication rates and risks

with some minimally invasive accesses, such as a single

anterior access, and have reported unusual complications

andprolongeddurationofsurgery,alongwithlonglearning curves.8,9

Our objective here was toassess the clinical and

func-tionalresultsoverthemediumterm(minimumfollow-upof

sixyears)andthecomplicationsfromuncementedtotalhip

arthroplasty performedby means ofaposterior minimally

invasiveaccess,incomparisonwithatraditionalrightlateral access.

Material

and

methods

Afterobtainingapprovalfromourinstitution’sresearchethics

committee,aprospectivecomparativestudywasconducted

in which 224 adult patients underwent elective total hip

arthroplasty due to a diagnosis of primary or secondary

osteoarthrosis.Thepatientswereselectedfromthewaiting listofourhospital’sHipGroup.

ThesamplesaredescribedinTable1.

Randomizationwasperformedbymeansofasequenceof

randomnumbers,withdivisionintotwogroupsatthetime

ofmakingthesurgicalappointments.Thiswasdonebya sur-geonwhowasnotdirectlyinvolvedinthisstudy,withoutthe knowledgeofthesurgeonwhowasthefirstauthor.Inthefirst group,theposterioraccessfirstdescribedbyMoorewasused, withsmall-sizedincisionsandminimaldissectionofsoft tis-sues.Inthepatientsofthecontrolgroup,thetraditionalright

Table1–Sampleparameter.

Minimally invasivegroup

Controlgroup pvalue

(3)

lateralaccessroutefirstdescribedbyHardingerwasused,but withthepatientinlateraldecubitus.Therewere103patients intheminimallyinvasiveaccessgroupand121intheright lateralaccessgroup.

Themeanlengthoffollow-upforthewholesamplewas7.2 years,witharangefrom6.1to9years.

Thecriteriafornon-inclusioncomprisedpresentationof anytypeofcoagulopathy,systemicarterialhypertensionthat wasnotunderpharmacologicalcontrol,previoushipsurgery orsequelaefromcongenitalhipdysplasiaofCrowetypes2,3 or4thatrequiredstructuralgraftingintheacetabularroof.

Theexclusion criterion was loss offollow-up occurring beforethetimeoftheoutpatientassessmentinthesixthyear aftertheoperation.

Allthepatientsfollowedthesameprotocolfor postopera-tiveanalgesia,whichconsistedof100mgoftramadol(Pfizer®)

intravenously every eight hours and 100mg of ketoprofen

(Eurofarma®)inasingleintravenousdosedailyuntilthedayof

hospitaldischarge.Thromboembolicprophylaxiswas admin-isteredtoallthepatients,consistingof40mgofenoxaparin appliedsubcutaneously(Sanofi-Aventis®),startingonthefirst

dayaftertheoperationandcontinuinguntilthe30thday. All the patients were discharged on the fifth day after theoperationandweregivenguidanceregarding physiother-apyandanticoagulantandanalgesicmedications(500mgof paracetamolorallyeverysixhours,ifnecessary).

Inthisstudy,weusedtwomodelsofuncemented prosthe-sis(MeridianfemoralnailwithVitalock-Stryker®acetabulum

and Bicontact femoral nail with Aesculap® Plasmacup®

acetabulum). The choice between these two implants was

basedmerelyontheiravailabilityonthe dayonwhichthe patientwasoperated.Bothofthesemanufacturerswere sup-plierstoourhipsurgeryserviceatthetimeofthisstudy.

All the patients inthe minimally invasive accessgroup wereoperatedbythefirstauthorofthisstudyandthepatients intherightlateralaccessgroupwereoperatedbythree sur-geons,amongwhomwasthefirstauthor.

Somepointsrelatingtothe posteriorminimallyinvasive accessneedtobehighlighted.Thisisanaccessroutethat impliesagentle learningcurve,evenforsurgeonswho are accustomedto thetraditional posterioraccess. The princi-pleofthemovingwindowmaybeofgreatvaluewithregard toacetabularand femoralaccess:the positionofthe spac-ersshouldbechangedaccordingtotheregiontobeprepared, withsoft-tissuedisplacementdistallyforpreparationofthe acetabulumandproximallyforpreparationofthefemur,soas toavoidgreattensioningofthesurfacetissuesandminimize theriskofscarcomplicationsatthesurgicalincision.

The physiotherapy protocol used consisted of assisted

activeflexionoftheanklesandkneesusinganabductionpad, startingonthefirstpostoperativeday;andgaittrainingwith partialweight-bearingstartingonthesecond day,withfull loadappliedsixweeksaftertheoperation.Eachpatient’s evo-lutionwasfollowedupbymeansofreturnvisitsscheduledto takeplaceone,three,six,12and24weeksaftertheoperation. Thereturnvisitsbecameannualafterthefirstpostoperative year.

A clinical–functional assessment was made and the

radiographic criteria were also analyzed in both groups.

Fortheclinical–functionalassessment,theHarrisHipScore

questionnairewasusedbeforetheoperation(duringtheweek precedingthesurgery),sixmonthsandoneyearafterwards and,finally,sixyearsafterthesurgery.Sixyearsoffollow-up

was consideredtobethe minimumlengthoftime forthis

criterioninthepresentstudy.

Possiblelate complicationsand asepticloosening ofthe prostheticcomponentsamongthepatientsofthisstudywere evaluatedaftersixyearsoffollow-up.

Aradiographicassessmentwasmadeatthereturnvisitsix monthsaftertheoperation.Theacetabularpositioningwas consideredtobegoodiftheabductionangleofthe acetabu-lumwasbetween35◦ and50.Thefemoralpositioningwas

consideredtobegoodifthefemoralcomponentspresented

between0◦and5ofvalgus.

PresenceorabsenceoftheTrendelenburgclinicalsignwas measuredatthereturnvisitsixyearsaftertheoperation.

Thelinearradiographicwearpresentedbythepolyethylene wasmeasuredusingacompassandrulermarkedin millime-tersatthesixth-yearfollow-up.Thevariationinthicknessof

thepolyethylenebetweentheupperandlowerportionswas

evaluatedbasedonthesphericityoftheprosthetichead.We consideredthatthewearwasunacceptableifitwas≥1mm,

whichwouldrepresentmorethan0.1mmoflinearwearper

year, given the length of follow-up of the patients in our study.10

Quantitative variables with Gaussian distribution were comparedusingthenon-pairedStudentttest.Datathatdid notpresentnormaldistributionwereevaluatedbymeansof

nonparametric tests.Comparisonsbetweenthe twogroups

were madeusingtheMann–Whitneytest.Qualitative

(non-numerical)datawereanalyzedusingthechi-squaretest,or theFishertestwhennecessary.Thelevelofstatistical signifi-cancewassetatp=0.05.

Results

Regardingtheprosthesismodelsused,theMeridian/Vitalock (Stryker®)implantwasmoreprevalentinbothgroupsthanthe

Bicontact/Plasmacup(Aesculap®),butwithoutanysignificant

difference(60.2%versus53.7%;p=0.34).

Adiagnosisofprimaryhiposteoarthrosiswasmadein61 patientsoftherightlateralgroup(50.4%)and57ofthe mini-mallyinvasivegroup(55.3%),withp=0.5.Alltheotherpatients werediagnosedwithosteoarthrosissecondarytoother patho-logicalconditions,whichincludedosteonecrosis,seronegative

arthritis, sequelae from Pèrthes disease, sequelae from a

slipped epiphysis, rheumatoid arthritis and post-traumatic hiparthritis.

Thelinearradiographicwearofthepolyethylenewas mea-suredusingacompassandrulermarkedinmillimetersatthe sixth-yearfollow-up.Agreaterdegreeofwearthanexpected (>1mm)wasobservedin30%ofthepatientsintheminimally invasivegroup,versus33.8%ofthecontrols,withp=0.56.

Intheminimallyinvasivegroup,noacetabularorfemoral osteolysiswasidentifiedinanyofthepatientsfromthesixth

year onwards. However,osteolysis was diagnosed in three

(4)

In relation to the acetabular and femoral positioning amongthepatientswithaminimallyinvasiveaccess,

unsa-tisfactory results were noted in 5.8% of the acetabular

components and in4.8%of the femoralnails.In

compari-son,inthe controlgroup,therewere unsatisfactoryresults in9.9%oftheacetabularcomponentsand7.4%ofthefemoral components,withpvaluesof0.32and0.58,respectively.

TheTrendelenburg clinical test, which shows weakness

oftheabductormusculatureofthehip,waspositiveinfive patientswhowereoperatedbymeansofthetraditionallateral

approachbut wasabsentfrom all thepatients who

under-wentsurgerybymeansoftheposteriorminimally invasive

access,althoughtherewasnostatisticallysignificant differ-ence(p=0.06).

The clinical–functional assessments in the two groups

beforethesurgeryweresimilar(meanof47.5intheminimally invasivegroupand48inthecontrolgroup)(p=0.88).

TheHarrisHipScoreaftertheoperationshowedthatthere hadbeenanimprovementinbothgroups,withsimilarmean scores(86intherightlateralgroupversus87.6inthe mini-mallyinvasivegroup;p=0.55).

Asepticacetabularlooseningoccurredinonepatient,who hadbeenoperatedbymeansoftheminimallyinvasive pos-terioraccess.Thiscaseunderwentrevision12monthsafter theinitialsurgery.Revisionoftheprosthesiswasnecessary intwoofthepatientsinthecontrolgroup:thepolyethylene inonepatientwasexchangedafter6.5yearsoffollow-upand acetabularrevisionwasperformedinanotherpatientofthis groupaftersevenyears(p=0.46).

Theonlystatisticallysignificantresultwasthesizeofthe incision(p<0.001),withameanof95.1mmfortheminimally invasiveaccessand169.8mmforthetraditionallateralaccess (Fig.1).

Regarding complications, there were two cases in the

minimallyinvasivegroup:oneofmedialacetabular fractur-ingwithoutdisplacement,whichwastreatedconservatively; andoneofheterotopicossification,whichrequiredsurgical resection.Inthecontrolgroup,thereweretwocasesoffemoral fractures,whichweretreatedbymeansofcerclageduringthe samesurgicalprocedure;onecaseofdislocation,whichwas treatedbymeansofclosedreduction,withoutrecurrence;one caseofsuperficialinfection,whichwastreatedbymeansof oralantibiotictherapy; andone caseofneuropraxiaofthe ulnarnervecausedbythepositioningonthesurgicaltable, whichregressedaftereightweeks.Nosignificantdifference wasobservedbetweenthegroups(p=0.45).

Discussion

Inourstudy,wenotedthatthemeanageofourpatientswas lower than seen instudies in the literature,which mostly showedmean ages greater than 60years.2,11 This can

per-hapsbeexplainedbytheconsiderablenumbers ofcasesof

osteoarthrosis secondary to systemic and rheumatological

diseasesthatwereobservedinoursetting(almosthalfofour patients).Anotherpossiblecauseforthisfindingwasperhaps thetypicalpyramidalagedistributionoftheBrazilian popula-tion,whichdiffersfromthatofEuropeanorNorthAmerican

countries. Thislower mean age may representa sourceof

Fig.1–Scarof5.5cmsixmonthsaftertheoperation.

bias,bothtowardbetterrecoveryfromtheacute postopera-tivephaseandtowardthecomplicationsinherenttowearand looseningofthearthroplasty,giventhatthesepatients theo-reticallyhaveahigherdegreeofphysicalandworkactivity.

Otherpossiblesourcesofbiasintheresultsobtainedinthe presentstudyincludethefactthattwoprosthesismodelswere usedinbothgroups,althoughbothmodelswereuncemented. However,mostofthestudieswithlargesampleshavetended topresent thissame bias.Regardingthe controlgroup,the factthattheprocedureswereperformedbydifferentsurgeons mightalsobeconsideredtobeasourceofbias,although diver-sityofsurgeonshasalsobeenreportedbyagoodproportion ofpreviousauthors.

Theuseofprostheseswithatribologicalpairconsistingof aconventionalpolyethyleneinsertandametalhead,together withthepatients’lowerageandconsequentlyhigherlevelof activity,mayhavebeenresponsibleforthelinearweargreater thanexpectedthatwasfoundinone-thirdofthecases,and for theearly acetabularosteolysisthat was foundinthree patientsofthecontrolgroup.However,weemphasizethatthe methodologyusedformeasuringthewearofthepolyethylene presentsamarginoferrorofaround15%.Methodsofgreater precisionsuchascomputerizedthree-dimensionalmodelsare usedtoday,butthesewerenottakenintoconsiderationinthe

present studybecausetheydidnotformtheauthors’main

objective.

(5)

Fig.2–Straightacetabularimpactor,whichmightmakeit difficulttopositionthecomponent.

(>52)tendtopresentgreatertechnicaldifficultyforsurgeons, withahigherriskoflateralizationandgreaterabductionangle fortheacetabularcomponent.Thisresultsfromtheangleof attackoftheacetabularreamer,whichisharmfulparticularly

whenreamers and impactors that are adaptedforsmaller

accessesarenotused(Fig.2).12

Weaknessoftheabductormusculature,asrepresentedbya positiveTrendelenburgtest,wasonlyfoundinpatientsinthe groupoperatedbymeansofalateralaccess.Thisresultwas notsignificant(p=0.06).Kinematicgaitstudieshaveproven thatbetterresultsare obtainedwhentheaccessuseddoes notinterferedirectlywiththeintegrityofthismusculature.13

Most studies have shown that the acute postoperative

recoveryisbetterwhenaminimallyinvasiveaccessisused, withlessbleeding,lowermuscledamageandshorter hospi-talstay.Thequestionofbleedingduringthehospitalstayis anotherpolemicalpointbecausealthoughmostauthorshave reportedmeanvolumesofbleedingof500mL,2,3,14,15the inci-denceoftransfusionsamongthepatientsiscloseto50%.This denotesa contradictionand a likelyunderestimate, which

has been confirmed by other studies in which the central

scopewasbloodvolumelossandthemethodologywasmore

detailedforsuchestimates.5,16,17

Our study, with a follow-up of more than six years,

presented results similar to data in the literature on this

topic, as demonstrated in a recent meta-analysis, which

showed similar evolution inthe two groups, both in rela-tion to the radiographicparameters and in relation tothe clinical–functionalscore ofthe Harris HipScore, atall the timesevaluated.However,themediumandlong-term follow-upseemstobeuncertainandinconclusive,giventhescarcity ofcomparativestudieswithlongerfollow-ups,andthereisno evidencesofarregardingthesuperiorityoftheseaccessesin relationtothetraditionalroutes.18

Overall,inthewholesample,weonlyobservedonecaseof dislocation.Webelievethatthislowincidencewasduetothe intensiveworkconductedbythephysiotherapyteamofour service,inwhichposturaleducationalmeasureswere imple-mentedtodiminishtheriskofthiscomplication.Moreover,in

ourstudy,wewereonlydealingwithpatientswithadiagnosis ofosteoarthrosis.Itiswellknownthatthesepatientspresent lowerriskthandopatientswithadiagnosisoffracturingof thefemoralneckwhoundergototalhiparthroplasty.

Wechosetoevaluateoveralloccurrencesofcomplications pergroup,inacomparativemanner,becausethesamplesize wouldbeinsufficientforustoevaluateeachcomparisonin detailaccordingtoeachtypeofcomplicationthatoccurred.

Theonlyvariableevaluated inthis study thatshoweda significant differencefortheminimally invasiveaccess,i.e. thesmaller-sizedincision,theoreticallywouldindicate that the estheticresultwouldbe better.However,in2005, Mow etal.19demonstratedworsescarringresultsfromsmall inci-sions.Inoursample,therewerenoestheticcomplaints,but itneedstobeborneinmindthatthisshouldbelastcriterion forindicatingalessinvasiveaccess.

Conclusion

Themedium-termclinicalandradiographicresultsandthe

complication rate are similar forpatients undergoing total hiparthroplastybymeansofaposteriorminimallyinvasive access and by means of the traditionalright lateral route.

However, the right lateral access more frequently causes

insufficiencyoftheabductormusculature,inrelationtothe posteriorminimallyinvasiveaccess.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1.WenzJF,GurkanI,JibodhSR.Mini-incisiontotalhip arthroplasty:acomparativeassessmentofperioperative outcomes.Orthopedics.2002;25(10):1031–43.

2.GoldsteinWM,BransonJJ,BerlandKA,GordonAC.

Minimal-incisiontotalhiparthroplasty.JBoneJointSurgAm. 2003;85Suppl.4:33–8.

3.MattaJM,ShahrdarC,FergusonT.Single-incisionanterior approachfortotalhiparthroplastyonanorthopaedictable. ClinOrthopRelatRes.2005;441:115–24.

4.BergerRA.Totalhiparthroplastyusingtheminimally invasivetwo-incisionapproach.ClinOrthopRelatRes. 2003;(417):232–41.

5.VicenteJR,CrociAT,CamargoOP.Bloodlossintheminimally invasiveposteriorapproachtototalhiparthroplasty:a comparativestudy.Clinics.2008;63(3):351–6[SaoPaulo]. 6.DeBeerJ,PetruccelliD,ZalzalP,WinemakerMJ.

Single-incision,minimallyinvasivetotalhiparthroplasty: lengthdoesn’tmatter.JArthroplasty.2004;19(8):945–50. 7.OgondaL,WilsonR,ArchboldP,LawlorM,HumphreysP,

O’BrienS,etal.Minimal-incisiontechniqueintotalhip arthroplastydoesnotimproveearlypostoperativeoutcomes. Aprospective,randomized,controlledtrial.JBoneJointSurg Am.2005;87(4):701–10.

(6)

9. BalBS,HaltomD,AletoT,BarretM.Earlycomplicationsof primarytotalhipreplacementperformedwithatwo-incision minimallyinvasivetechnique.JBoneJointSurgAm.

2005;87(11):2432–8.

10.GriffithMJ,SeidensteinMK,WilliamsD,CharnleyJ.Socket wearinlowfrictionarthroplastyofthehip.ClinOrthopRelat Res.1978;(137):37–47.

11.SwansonTV.Earlyresultsof1000consecutive,posterior, single-incisionminimallyinvasivesurgerytotalhip arthroplasties.JArthroplasty.2005;20(Suppl3):26–32. 12.VicenteJR,CrociAT,CamargoOP.Restaurac¸ãodocentrode

rotac¸ãonaartroplastiatotaldoquadrilminimamente invasiva.ActaOrtopBras.2009;17(2):14–7.

13.RitterMA,HartyLD,KeatingME,FarisPM,MedingJB.A clinicalcomparisonoftheanterolateralandposterolateral approachestothehip.ClinOrthopRelatRes.2001;(385):95–9. 14.ChimentoGF,PavoneV,SharrockN,KahnB,CahillJ,Sculco

TP.Minimallyinvasivetotalhiparthroplasty.Aprospective randomizedstudy.JArthroplasty.2005;20(2):139–44.

15.WrightJM,CrockettHC,DelgadoS,LymanS,MadsenM, SculcoTP.Mini-incisionfortotalhiparthroplasty.A prospective,controlledinvestigationwith5-yearfollow-up evaluation.JArthroplasty.2004;19(5):538–45.

16.RosencherN,KerkkampHEM,MacherasG,MunueraLM, MenichellaG,BartonDM,etal.Orthopedicsurgery

transfusionhemoglobinEuropeanoverview(OSTHEO)study: bloodmanagementinelectivekneeandhiparthroplastyin Europe.Transfusion.2003;43(4):459–69[Paris].

17.PiersonJL,HannonTJ,EarlesDR.Ablood-conservation algorithmtoreducebloodtransfusionaftertotalhipand kneearthroplasty.JBoneJointSurgAm.2004;86(7):1512–8. 18.MoskalJT,CappsSG.Islimitedincisionbetterthanstandard

totalhiparthroplasty?Ameta-analysis.ClinOrthopRelat Res.2013;471(4):1283–94.

19.MowCS,WoolsonST,NgarmukosS,ParkEH,LorenzPH. Comparisonofscarsfromtotalhipreplacementsdonewitha standardoramini-incision.ClinOrthopRelatRes.

Imagem

Table 1 – Sample parameter.
Fig. 1 – Scar of 5.5 cm six months after the operation.
Fig. 2 – Straight acetabular impactor, which might make it difficult to position the component.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Foi elaborado um banco de dados de projetos com determinadas características subjetivas, resultado da consulta feita a especialistas (engenheiros, arquitetos e

The objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term results from MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellar dislocation, by means of a technique using a

This was a retrospective case series. Patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty, with a minimum of two years of clinical follow-up, were assessed. The study comprised

Taking into account thermal changes and magnetic saturation by introducing some constraints, a dimensional analysis was used to compare a non-regular topology with a

No caso em estudo, a perda de solo estimada para a condição de incêndio é cerca de 50 vezes superior à da condição de cobertura florestal ante- rior ao incêndio, e a

Portanto, como resultado das ações extensionistas analisadas, evidencia-se, por meio dos projetos de extensão realizados, que apresentam indícios de possuírem

Long-term results of expansive laminoplasty for ossiication of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: more than 10 years follow-up. Hale JJ, Gruson KI,