• Nenhum resultado encontrado

1. Práticas de supervisão: um espaço de desenvolvimento profissional

1.3. Etapas do desenvolvimento profissional dos professores

algorithmes Fugue [47], pour les structures secondaires, et metaFoRe [9], pour des noyaux

compacts. Puis nous pouvons simuler leur repliement et ensuite les agrandir, jusqu’à simuler

le repliement de la protéine complète. Nous pensons que ce type de simulation pourrait suivre

les mêmes étapes de repliement que celles des protéines in vitro.

IV.5. Références

1. Aszodi A. & Taylor W.R. (1996) Homology modelling by distance geometry. Fold. Des.

1, 325-334.

2. Voorhoorst W.G.B., Warner A., de Vos W.M. & Siezen R. J. (1997) Homology modelling

of two subtilisin-like serine protease from the hyperthermophilic archae Pyrococcus

furiosus and Thermococcus stetteri. Prot. Eng. 10, 905 - 914.

3. Gomar J., Sodano R, Ptak M. & Vovelle F. (1997) Homology modelling of an

antimicrobial protein, Ace—AMPl, from lipid transfer protein structures. Fol. Des. 2,

183-192.

4. Martin A.C., MacArthur M.W. & Thornton J.M. (1997) Assessment of comparative

modeling in CASP2. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. Suppl. 1. 14—28.

5. Hendlich M., Lackner P, Weitckus S., Flôckner H., Froschauer S., Gottsbacher K.,

Casari G. & Sippl M.J. (1990) Identification of native protein folds against a large

number of incorrect models./. Mol. Biol. 216.167-180.

6. Sippl M.J. & Weitckus S. (1992) Détection of native—like models for amino acids

sequences of unknown three—dimensional structure in a data base of known protein

conformations. Proteins 13, 258—271.

7. Jones D.T., Taylor W.R. & Thornton J.M. (1992) A new approach to protein fold

récognition. Nature358. 86—89.

8. Bryant S.H. & Laurence C.E. (1993) An empirical energy function for threading protein

sequence through the folding motif. Proteins 16, 92-112.

9. Kocher J.—P.A., Rooman M.J. & Wodak S.J. (1994) Factors influencing the ability of

knowledge—based potentials to identify native sequence—structure matches. 7. Mol.

Biol. 235,1598-1613.

10. Madej T, Gibart J.F. & Bryant S.H. (1995) Threading a database of protein cores.

Proteins 23, 356—369.

11. Lemer C.M.R., Rooman M.J. & Wodak S.J. (1995) Protein structure prédiction by

threading methods: évaluation of current techniques. Proteins 23, 337—355.

12. Nagano K. (1980) Logical analysis of the mechanism of protein folding V. Packing game

simulation of a/(3 proteins. 7. Mol. Biol. 138. 797-832.

13. Richmond TJ. & Richards F.M. (1978) Packing of a-helices: geometrical constraints

and contact areas. 7. Mol. Biol. 119. 537—555.

14. Cohen F.E., Sternberg M.J.E. & Taylor W.R. (1982) Analysis and prédiction of the

packing of a-helices against a p—sheet in the tertiary structure of globular proteins.

7. Mol. Biol. 156, 821-862.

15. Cohen F.E., Sternberg M.J.E. & Taylor W.R. (1980) Analysis and prédiction of protein

(3—sheet structures by a combinatorial approach. Nature285. 378—382.

16. Cohen EE., Sternberg M.J.E. & Taylor W.R. (1981) Analysis of the tertiary structure

of protein |3—sheet sandwiches./. Mol. Biol. 148. 253-272.

17. Vâsquez M. & Scheraga H.A. (1985) Use of buildup and energy minimization

procedures to compute low—energy structures of the backbone of enkephalin.

Biopolymers 24. 1437—1447.

18. Simon I., Classer L. & Scheraga H.A. (1991) Calculation of protein conformation as

an assembly of stable overlapping fragments: application to bovine pancreatic trypsin

inhibitor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 3661—3665.

19. Sippl M.J., Hendlich M. & Lackner P. (1992) Assembly of polypeptide and protein

backbone conformations from low energy ensembles of short fragments: development

of strategies and construction of models for myoglobin, lysozyme and thymosin |34.

Protein Sci. 1, 625—640.

20. Duan Y. & Kollman P.A. (1998) Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed

in a 1—microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science282, 740—744.

21. Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A.W., Rosenbluth M.N. & Teller A.H. (1953) Equation of

State calculations by fast computing machines./. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087—1092.

22. Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C.D.Jr. & Vecchi M.P. (1983) Optimization by simulated

annealing. Science220. 671-680.

23. Metroplis N., Rosenbluth A.W., Rosenbluth M.N. & A.H. Teller (1953) Equation of

State calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21,1087—1092.

24. Hansmann U.H.E., Okamoto Y. & Onuchic J.N. (1999) The folding funnel landscape

for the peptide met—enkephalin. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 34, 472—483.

25. Sung S.S. (1999) Monte Carlo simulation of |3 -hairpin folding at constant température.

Biophys. J. 76,164—175.

26. Rey A. & Skolnick J. (1993) Computer modeling and folding of four-hélix bundles.

Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 16, 8—28.

27. Kolinski A., & Skolnick J. (1994) Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. I. Lattice

model and interaction scheme. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet.18, 338—352.

28. Kolinski A., & Skolnick J. (1994) Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. II.

Application to protein A, ROP, and crambin. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 18.

353-366.

29. Ortiz A.R., Kolinski A. & Skolnick J. (1998) Nativelike topology assembly of small

proteins using predicted restraints in Monte Carlo folding simulations. Proc. Natl.

Acad. Sci. USA 95, 1020-1025.

30. Ortiz A.R., Kolinski A. & Skolnick J. (1998) Fold assembly of small proteins using

Monte Carlo simulations driven by restraints derived from multiple sequence

alignments./. Mol. Biol. 277. 419—448.

31. Kawai H., Kikuchi T. & Okamoto Y. (1989) A prédiction of tertiary structures of

peptide by the Monte Carlo simulated annealing method. Prot. Eng. 3, 85—94.

32. Gunn J.R., Monge A., Friesner R.A. & Marshall C.H. (1994) Hierarchical algorithm

for computer modelling of protein tertiary structure: folding of myoglobin at 6.2 Â

resolution./. Phys. Chem. 98, 702-711.

33. Monge A., Lathrop E.J.R, Gunn J.R., Shenkin RS. & Friesner R.A. (1995) Computer

modeling of protein folding: conformational and energetic analysis of reduced and

detailed protein models./. Mol. Biol. 247. 995—1012.

34. Standley D.M., Gunn J.R., Friesner R.A. & McDermott A.E. (1998) Tertiary structure

prédiction of mixed a/|3 proteins via energy minimization. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet.

33, 240-252.

35. Jernigan R.L. (1992) Rrotein folds. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2, 248—256.

36. Skolnick J. & Kolinski A. (1990) Simulations of the folding of a globular protein. Science

250. 1121-1125.

37. Goldberg D.E. (1989) Genetic algorithm in search, optimization and machine learning.

Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachussetts.

38. Redersen J.T. & Moult J. (1996) Genetic algorithm for protein structure prédiction.

Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 6, 227—231.

39. Yue K. & Dill K.A. (1995) Forces of tertiary structural organization of globular

proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. SCI USA 92,146—150.

40. Yue K. & Dill K.A. (1996) Folding proteins with a simple energy fonction and extensive

conformational searching. Prat. Sci. 5, 254-261.

41. Defay T. & Cohen F.E. (1995) Evaluation of current techniques for ab initio protein

structure prédiction. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 23, 431—445.

42. Lesk A.M. (1997) CASR2: report on ab initio prédictions. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet.

Suppl. 1. 151 — 166.

43. Koehl F. & Levitt M. (1999) A brighter future for protein structure prédiction. Nature

Struct. Biol. 6,108—111.

44. Abkevich VI., Gutin A.M. & Shakhnovich E.I. (1994) Spécifie nucléus as the transition

State for protein folding: evidence from the lattice model. Biochemistry 33.

10026-10036.

45. Go N. & Taketomi H. (1978) Respective rôles of short— and long—range interactions

in protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 75, 559—563.

46. Unger R. & Moult J. (1996) Local interactions dominate folding in a simple protein

model. J. Mol. Biol. 259. 988—994.

47. Rooman M.J., Kocher J.—RA. & Wodak S.J. (1992) Extracting information on folding

from the amino acid sequence; accurate prédictions for protein régions with preferred

conformation in the absence of tertiary interactions. Biochemistry M, 10226—10238.

48. Govindarajan S. & Goldstein R. (1995) Optimal local propensities for model proteins.

Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 22. 413—418

49. Abkevich VI., Gutin A.M. & Shakhnovich E.I. (1994) Free energy landscape for

protein folding kinetics: intermediates, traps, and multiple pathways in theory and

lattice model simulations. 7. Chem. Phys. 101. 6052-6062.

50. Sali A., Shakhnovich E. & Karplus M. (1994) How does a protein fold? Nature 369.

248-251.

51. Sali A., Shakhnovich E. & Karplus M. (1994) Kinetics of protein folding. A lattice

model study of the requirements for folding to the native State. J. Mol. Biol. 235.

1614-1636.

52. Abkevich V.I., Gutin A.M. & Shakhnovich E. (1994) Spécifie nucléus as the transition

State for protein folding; evidence from the lattice model. Biochemistry 33.

10026-10036.

53. Abkevich V.I., Gutin A.M. & Shakhnovich E. (1995) Impact of local and non-local

interactions on thermodynamics and kinetics of protein folding. J. Mol. Biol. 252.

460-471.

54. Shakhnovich E., Abkevich V. & Ptitsyn O. (1996) Conserved residues and the

mechanism of protein folding. Nature 379, 96—98.

55. Ramachandran G. & Sasiekharan V. (1968) Conformation of polypeptides and

proteins. ^<7v. Protein Chem. 23, 283-437.

56. Rooman M.J., Kocher J.-RA. & Wodak S.J. (1991) Prédiction of protein backbone

conformation based on 7 structures assignments: influence of local interactions./. Mol.

Biol. 221, 961-979.

57. Levitt M. (1976) A simplified représentation of protein conformations for rapid

simulation of protein folding./. Mol. Biol. 104. 59-107.

58. Kabsch W. (1978) A discussion of the solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of

vccioxs. Acta Crystallod. Sect. A 34, 827—828.

59. Cox J.P.L., Evans P.A., Packman L.C., Williams D.H. & Woolfson D.N. (1993)

Dissecting the structure of a partially folded protein. Circular dichroism and nuclear

magnetic résonance studies of peptides from ubiquitin./. Mol. Biol. 234. 483—492.

60. Harding M.M., Williams D.H. & Woolfson D.N. (1991) Characterization of a partially

denatured State of a protein by two—dimensional NMR: réduction of the hydrophobie

interactions in ubiquitin. Biochemistry 30, 3120—3128.

61. Stockman B.J., Euvrard A. & Scahill TA. (1993) Heteronuclear three—dimensional

NMR spectroscopy of a partially denatured protein: the A—State of human ubiquitin.

J. Biomol. NMR3, 285-296.

62. Kraulis RJ. (1991) MOLSCRIPT: a program to produce both detailed and schematic

plots of protein structures./. Appl. Crystllogr. 24, 946-950.

63. Casari G. & Sippl M.J. (1992) Structure derived hydrophobie potential. Hydrophobie

potential derived from X—ray structures of globular proteins is able to identify native

folds./. Mol. Biol. 224, 725-732.

64. Bryant S.H. & Lawrence C.E. (1993) An empirical energy fonction for threading

protein sequence through folding motif. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Genet. 16, 92-112.

65. Chan H.S. & Dill K.A. (1990) Origin of structure in globular proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad.

Sci. USA 87, 6388-6392.

66. Lee B., Kurochkina N. & Kang H.S. (1996) Protein folding by a biased Monte Carlo

procedure in the dihedral angle space. Faseb Journal 10, 119—125.

67. Ballew R.M., Sabelko J. & Gruebele M. (1996) Direct observation of fast protein

folding: the initial collapse of apomyglobin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93,5759—5764.

68. Williams S., Causgrove T.P., Gilmanshin R., Fang K.S., Callender R.H., Woodruff WH.

& Dyer R.B. (1996) Fast event in protein folding: hélix melting and formation in a small

peptide. Biochemistry 35, 691—697.

69. Gilmanshin R., Williams S., Callender R.H., Woodruff WH. & R.B. Dyer (1997) Fast

events in protein folding: relaxation dynamics of secondary and tertiary structure in

native apomyoglobin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 3709—3713.

70. Eaton W.A., Munoz V, Thompson P.A., Chan C.—K. & Hofrichter J. (1997)

Submillisecond kinetics of protein folding. Cur. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7, 10—14.

71. Reva B., Finkelstein A.V. & Skolnick J. (1998) What is the probability of a chance

prédiction of a protein structure within an rmsd of 6 Â? Fol. Des. 3, 141-147.