• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. vol.36 número5

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. vol.36 número5"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

rev bras hematol hemoter. 2014;36(5):311–312

Revista

Brasileira

de

Hematologia

e

Hemoterapia

Brazilian

Journal

of

Hematology

and

Hemotherapy

w w w . r b h h . o r g

Scientific

comment

Does

angiogenesis

matter

in

primary

myelofibrosis?

Paulo

Vidal

Campregher

HospitalIsraelitaAlbertEinstein(HIAE),SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received29May2014 Accepted6June2014 Availableonline17July2014

Primarymyelofibrosis(PMF)isaclonalhematopoieticdisorder characterizedbyaninitialprefibroticproliferativephasethat overtimeprogressestobonemarrowfibrosis,extramedullary hematopoiesis,peripheralbloodcytopeniasandanincreased riskofdeveloping acutemyeloidleukemia (AML).Inrecent years,themolecularmechanismsthatcausePMFhavebeen extensivelystudiedandthegenomicchangesthatcausethe diseasehavebeenwidelyelucidated.1

A unique feature of PMF is a systemic inflammatory reactionthat manifests,amongother things, through high serum levels of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and a stromal bone marrow reaction involving collagen deposition and increased vascular proliferation.2,3 There

is now convincing evidence that megakaryocytes play a major role in this stromal reaction.4,5 More specifically,

megakaryocytesfrompatientswithPMFproducehighlevels of inflammatory cytokines including transforming growth factor-beta1(TGF␤1).6Recently,PMFsystemicinflammatory

reaction has taken center stage after a suggestion that a possible mechanism by which ruxolitinib, a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, increases overall survival, is through its

DOIoforiginalarticle:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjhh.2014.07.010.

SeepaperbyPanceCCetal.onpages322–8.

Correspondingauthorat:HospitalIsraelitaAlbertEinstein,Av.AlbertEinstein,627/701,BlocoD,1◦andar,BiologiaMolecular-LATE/IIEP,

05652-900SãoPaulo,SP,Brazil.

E-mailaddress:paulo.campregher@einstein.br(P.V.Campregher).

anti-inflammatoryeffect,asthismedicationonlymarginally decreasesthediseaseburden.7

While the diagnosis of advanced PMF is not a major challenge,thedifferentialdiagnosisbetweenprefibroticPMF and essential thrombocythemia (ET), a related neoplastic disease, is not always easy,8 since both diseases are

characterizedbyhighplateletcounts,increasedbonemarrow cellularity,andincreasednumberofatypicalmegakaryocytes in the bone marrow. The importance of making such differentiationisfundamental,sincemostpatientswithET haveabenigndiseasewhilePMFpatientshaveasubstantial decreaseinoverallsurvival.9,10

In this issue of the Revista Brasileira de Hematologiae Hemoterapia(RBHH),Ponceetal.evaluatedtheexpressionof anti-latency-associatedpeptide(LAP)humanTGF␤1inbone marrowmegakaryocytesaswellasthemicrovasculardensity (MVD) inbonemarrowbiopsiesfrom patientswithET and PMF.11 Althoughthe number ofpatientswas small,oneof

themainfindingsofthestudywasthatMVDissignificantly increasedinprefibroticPMFcomparedtoET.Sincethereis no objective wayofhistologicallydifferentiating prefibrotic

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjhh.2014.07.009

(2)

312

rev bras hematol hemoter. 2014;36(5):311–312

PMFfromET,theadditionofanoveldiagnostictoolthatmay contributetothisdifferentiationiswelcomed.Ifthefinding ofincreasedMVDobservedpredominantly inpatientswith prefibrotic PMF in this study can be reproduced by other authors,itcouldserveasanotherdiagnosticmarker,withthe potentialtoimprovethepathologist’sabilitytodifferentiate betweenthesetwoconditions.Recently,immunostainingfor nuclearfactor,erythroid-derived2(NF-E2)onbonemarrow biopsies has shown to be a promising technique to help differentiatebetweenprefibroticPMFandET.12

Another finding of the study of Ponce et al. was therelationshipbetweenmegakaryocyteTGF␤1expression, MVD and bone marrow fibrosis, suggesting a possible mechanismbywhichincreasedlevelsofTGF␤1producedby megakaryocytescan induce an inflammatoryreaction that culminatesinnewvesselformationandfibrosis.11Although

nocausalrelationshipcanbedetermined,thisfindingaddsto theliterature,pointingtoaroleforTGF␤1ontheprocessof neo-angiogenesisandfibrosisinhumanandanimalmodels ofPMF.6,13

Inconclusion,thesefindings maycontributetoimprove ourabilitytodifferentiatepatientswithprefibroticPMFandET andalsoreaffirmsapossibleroleofTGF␤1inneo-angiogenesis inPMF.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthordeclaresnoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1. CampregherPV,SantosFP,PeriniGF,HamerschlakN.

MolecularbiologyofPhiladelphia-negativemyeloproliferative

neoplasms.RevBrasHematolHemoter.2012;34(2):

150–5.

2.MesaRA,HansonCA,RajkumarSV,SchroederG,TefferiA.

Evaluationandclinicalcorrelationsofbonemarrow

angiogenesisinmyelofibrosiswithmyeloidmetaplasia.

Blood.2000;96(10):3374–80.

3.NiH,BarosiG,HoffmanR.Quantitativeevaluationofbone

marrowangiogenesisinidiopathicmyelofibrosis.AmJClin

Pathol.2006;126(2):241–7.

4.CiureaSO,MerchantD,MahmudN,IshiiT,ZhaoY,HuW,

etal.Pivotalcontributionsofmegakaryocytestothebiology

ofidiopathicmyelofibrosis.Blood.2007;110(3):986–93.

5.PapadantonakisN,MatsuuraS,RavidK.Megakaryocyte

pathologyandbonemarrowfibrosis:thelysyloxidase

connection.Blood.2012;120(9):1774–81.

6.MartyreMC.TGF-betaandmegakaryocytesinthe

pathogenesisofmyelofibrosisinmyeloproliferativedisorders.

LeukLymphoma.1995;20(1–2):39–44.

7.VerstovsekS.Changingmyelofibrosis’snaturalcourseatlast.

Blood.2014;123(12):1776–7.

8.WilkinsBS,ErberWN,BarefordD,BuckG,WheatleyK,East

CL,etal.Bonemarrowpathologyinessential

thrombocythemia:interobserverreliabilityandutilityfor

identifyingdiseasesubtypes.Blood.2008;111(1):60–70.

9.BarbuiT,ThieleJ,PassamontiF,RumiE,BoveriE,RuggeriM,

etal.Survivalanddiseaseprogressioninessential

thrombocythemiaaresignificantlyinfluencedbyaccurate

morphologicdiagnosis:aninternationalstudy.JClinOncol.

2011;29(23):3179–84.

10.TefferiA.Primarymyelofibrosis:2013updateondiagnosis,

risk-stratification,andmanagement.AmJHematol. 2013;88(2):141–50.

11.PonceCC,ChauffailleML,IharaSS,SilvaMR.Increased

angiogenesisinprimarymyelofibrosis:latenttransforming

growthfactor-␤asapossibleangiogenicfactor.RevBras

HematolHemoter.2014;36(5):322–8.

12.AumannK,FreyAV,MayAM,HauschkeD,KreutzC,MarxJP,

etal.Subcellularmislocalizationofthetranscriptionfactor

NF-E2inerythroidcellsdiscriminatesprefibroticprimary

myelofibrosisfromessentialthrombocythemia.Blood.

2013;122(1):93–9.

13.ChagraouiH,KomuraE,TulliezM,GiraudierS,Vainchenker

W,WendlingF.ProminentroleofTGF-beta1in

thrombopoietin-inducedmyelofibrosisinmice.Blood.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

In SCD patients, increased mean cell volume and low fetal hemoglobin were reported in both genders and high total hemoglobin and high mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration

This study shows that despite the medical advances in recent decades, pregnancy is still associated with many clinical and obstetric complications in patients with SCD, resulting in

This study indicates that retinal vascular disease occurs in both Hb SS and Hb SC patients and proliferative retinopathies (Goldberg stages) begin early in the Hb SS group and are

Eight-year clinical outcomes of long-term enzyme replacement therapy for 884 children with Gaucher Disease Type 1. Siebert M, Bock H, Michelin-Tirelli K, Coelho JC, Giugliani

Conclusion: These results confirm the high frequency of BCR-ABL rearrangements and the low survival rate of adult Brazilian patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia7. ©

that the majority of oncological clinics located in areas with endemic L. chagasi infections continue to have difficulties in making a firm diagnosis of VL. The clinical

Acute renal failure following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: incidence, outcome and risk factors. Saudi J Kidney

ease, and a second related donor allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation..