• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. vol.37 número2

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. Bras. Hematol. Hemoter. vol.37 número2"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto

(1)

w w w . r b h h . o r g

Revista

Brasileira

de

Hematologia

e

Hemoterapia

Brazilian

Journal

of

Hematology

and

Hemotherapy

Original

article

CD144,

CD146

and

VEGFR-2

properly

identify

circulating

endothelial

cell

Mariane

Cristina

Flores-Nascimento

,

Aline

Morandi

Alessio,

Fernanda

Loureiro

de

Andrade

Orsi,

Joyce

Maria

Annichino-Bizzacchi

UniversidadeEstadualdeCampinas(UNICAMP),Campinas,SP,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory: Received15July2014 Accepted28November2014 Availableonline31January2015

Keywords: Endothelialcells CD146antigens

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Studiesevaluatingcirculatingendothelialcellsbyflowcytometryarefacedbyalackof con-sensusaboutthebestcombinationofmonoclonalantibodiestobeused.Therarityofthese cellsinperipheralblood,whichrepresent0.01%ofmononuclearcells,drasticallyincreases thischallenge.

Objective:Theaimofthisstudyistosuggestsomecombinationsofmarkersthatwould safelyandproperlyidentifythesecells.

Methods:Flowcytometryanalysisofcirculatingendothelialcellswasperformedapplying threedifferentpanelscomposed ofdifferentcombinationsof theCD144,CD146,CD31, CD133,CD45andanti-Vascularendothelialgrowthfactorreceptor-2antibodies.

Results:Inspiteoftherarityoftheevents,theyweredetectableandpresentedsimilar inter-personnumbersofcirculatingendothelialcells.

Conclusion:Thecombinationofmarkerssuccessfullyidentifiedthecirculatingendothelial cellsinhealthyindividuals,withtheuseofthreedifferentpanelsconfirmingtheobtained dataasreliable.

©2015Associac¸ãoBrasileiradeHematologia,HemoterapiaeTerapiaCelular.Published byElsevierEditoraLtda.Allrightsreserved.

Introduction

Endothelialcells,locatedintheintimalayerofbloodvessels, evolveduring thevasculogenesis processinthe embryonic period.Thecirculatingformofthesecellswasfirstdescribed in1970andchallengedthetraditionalconceptthat endothe-lial regenerationand angiogenesis occurred exclusively via the proliferation ofthe pre-existing residentvessel wallof

Correspondingauthorat:LaboratóriodeHemostasia,HemocentrodeCampinas,UniversidadeEstadualdeCampinas(UNICAMP),Rua

CarlosChagas,480,13083-970Campinas,SP,Brazil.

E-mailaddress:[email protected](M.C.Flores-Nascimento).

endothelialcells.1,2Thefirststudies,performedbytwogroups,

reported that humanCD34+ cells,isolated from circulating

peripheralblood,umbilicalcordbloodandbonemarrow,could differentiateintoendothelialcellsinvitroandinvivoinmouse models, thereby contributing to neoendothelialization and neovascularizationintheadultorganism.3,4

Nowadaysthesecirculatingendothelialcells(CEC)arewell described asoriginatingfromthevascularwallorrecruited from the bone marrow (progenitor endothelial cells).3

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjhh.2014.11.014

(2)

Previousstudiesdescribedproliferatingclustersof endothe-lialcells invesselswithno sign ofvasculardenudationor injury,whichsupportsthetheoryofendogenousendothelial replacement.5–7Indifferentischemicmodels,therateof

incor-porationofbonemarrow-derivedcellsrangesfrom0%to57% butachieves80%invasculargrafts.8–10

Increased numbers of these cells have been identified inresponse to ischemia and vascular trauma11,12 inacute

myocardial infarction,13 sickle cell anemia,14 vasculitis,15

pulmonary hypertension16 and these cells have also been

attributed angiogenic potential.17 Some authors have also

postulatedthatCECmayactasanovelmarkertodistinguish betweenquiescentandactivediseasestates,suchasinsickle cell anemia, thalassemia, Kawasaki’s disease, and various cancers.14,18–20CECseemtoplayanactiverolein

hemosta-sis,bloodcoagulationandfibrinolysis,plateletandleukocyte interactionswiththevesselwall,lipoproteinmetabolism, his-tocompatibilityantigenpresentation,muscletoneregulation andarterialpressure.21

Althoughthegold-standardmethodtoevaluateCECisflow cytometry,thedeterminationofCECshasprovedtobe diffi-cultduethelackofaspecificmonoclonalantibodyagainst thecells22–24 and theabsenceofaconsensusregardingthe

bestcombinationofmarkers.Consideringthat,noconsensus hasbeenreacheduntilthismomentastowhichisthebest paneltoaccuratelyidentifyendothelialcellsandthe under-standingoftheimportanceofaccuratelyanalyzingthesecells, theaimofthispaperistoproposeacombinationof mark-ersthattogethermayperformthisanalysis.Thedefinitionof anappropriatepaneltostudythesecellsiscrucialtomakeit possibletocomparetheresultsofdifferentresearchgroups.

Methods

Inthis study,CEC were analyzedbyflow cytometry apply-ingthreedifferentpanelscomposedoftheantibodiesCD144, CD146, CD31, CD133, CD45 and anti-Vascular endothelial growthfactor receptor-2(VEGFR2),remembering thatthese cellscanpresentmorethanonephenotype.

ThisstudywasapprovedbythelocalResearchEthics Com-mitteeandwasinaccordancewiththeDeclarationofHelsinki. Aftersigningwritteninformedconsentforms,8mLof periph-eralbloodwerecollectedfromtheantecubitalveinof20blood donors (10 male, 10 female;mean age: 34.4±2.2 years) at theHemocentroinCampinas/UNICAMP.Participantswerenot takinganymedications.Thecollectionwasperformedusing twovacuumtubes(GreinerBio-One,Kremsmunster,Austria) containingEthylenediaminetetraaceticacid(EDTA),withthe firsttubebeingusedexclusivelyforbloodcountsdueto pos-siblecontaminationwithtracesofcollagen,thrombin25and

endothelialcellsduringvenipuncture.26Thesecondtubewas

usedforflowcytometryanalysis.Preparationofthesamples wascarriedoutimmediatelyaftercollection,andwere subse-quentlystoredat4◦Cuntilflowcytometry.

Absolute CEC number was derived from the white blood cell count, and defined as positive forCD31, CD144, CD146, VEGFR2 and negative for CD45 and CD133.3,23

The mouse anti-human conjugated antibodies used were fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled anti-CD31 (clone

Table1–Monoclonalantibodiesemployedincirculating endothelialcellsanalyses.

Antibody Clone Fluorochrome Manufacturer

CD31(+) MBC78.2;

PECAM1.2

FITC Invitrogen

CD45(−) 2D1 PerCP Becton

Dickinson CD133(−) AC133 APC Miltenyi

Biotec CD144(+) TEA1/31 PE Beckman

Coulter CD146(+) P1H12 PE Becton

Dickinson VEGFR2(+) 89106 PE R&D

IgGs – FITC

PE PerCP APC

Dako

MBC78.2;PECAM1.2,Invitrogen),anti-CD34(clone8G12; Bec-tonDickinson,Bioscences),phycoerthrin(PE)-labeledCD144 (cloneTEA1/31,BeckmanCoulter),anti-CD146(cloneP1H12, BD Bioscences), anti-VEGFR2 (clone 89106, R&D), peri-dinim chlorophyll (PerCP)-labeledanti-CD45(clone 2D1,BD Bioscences), and allophycocianin (APC)-labeled anti-CD133 (cloneAC133,MiltenyiBiotecGmbH,BergischGladbach, Ger-many)(Table1).Threedifferentpanelswerecreatedinthree tubesinanattempttocharacterizeCECwithdifferent pheno-typesasshowninTable2.

A quantityof100␮Lofblood (withaleukocyte

concen-tration between5and 10×103/

␮L) wasincubated with the

fluorochrome-labeledmonoclonalanti-humanantibodiesfor 20minat4◦Cinthedarkforthestainingprocedure.Theblood

count was performed using ahematological analyzer (Cell Dyn®;AbbottLaboratories,IL,USA).Redbloodcellswerelysed

byadding2mLofFACSlysingsolution(dilutedat1:10;Becton Dickinson)for10minat4◦C.Theremainingleucocyteswere

washedwith2mL2%phosphatebufferedsaline/bovineserum albuminbuffer(PBS/BSA)atpH=7.4,centrifugedat600×gfor 5minandresuspendedin500␮Lofwashbuffer.The

acqui-sition of500,000 cells or the totalvolume ofthe tube was performedusingaFACScalibur®flowcytometer(Becton

Dick-inson,SanJose, CA,USA)andanalyzedbyCell-Quest® and

Paint-a-Gate®computerprograms(BD,Bioscences).

The threshold was defined by a forward scatter (FSC) detectorwhichwasloweredinordertoincludelymphocytes. Platelets,debris andleucocyteswere excludedaccordingto theirFCS×SSCandSSC×CD45positions.CECwereanalyzed

Table2–Monoclonalantibodiesappliedinthe identificationandquantificationofmaturecirculating endothelialcells.

Panel Monoclonalantibodies

1 CD31FITC(+),CD144PE(+),CD45PerCP(−)

andCD133APC(−)

2 CD31FITC(+),CD146PE(+),CD45PerCP(−)

andCD133APC(−)

3 CD31FITC(+),VEGFR2PE(+),CD45PerCP(−)

(3)

0 256 512 768 1024

FSC 0

256 512 768 1024

SSC SSC

0 256 512 768 1024

CD 45

CD 45

100 101 102 103 104

CD45

100 101 102 103 104

100 101

102 103

104

100 101 102 103 104

CD 31 CD 31

CEC

CD 144 SSC

100

101

102 103

104

100 101 102 103 104 100

101 102

103 104

0 256 512 768 1024

100

101

102

103

104

CD 31 CD 144

Figure1–Analysisstrategyfortheidentificationofmaturecirculatingendothelialcells(CEC)byflowcytometry.The negativepopulationforCD45wasselectedandanalyzedforthepositivityofendothelialmarkers(CD144,CD146,CD31and

CD133anti-VEGFR2).

according to CD144×CD31×CD133, CD146×CD31×CD133 andanti-VEGFR2×CD31×CD133characteristics.Thestrategy appliedintheseCECanalyzesisshowninFigure1.

Statistical

analysis

Data are presented as mean±standard error of the mean (SEM). TheMann–Whitney test was used to compare con-tinuous variables. Analyses were performed using the R DevelopmentCoreTeam2010Software(Vienna,Austria)and p-values≤0.05wereconsideredstatisticallysignificant.

Results

Aspredicted,theseeventswereveryrare,althoughdetectable by flow cytometry using the aforementioned panels,

which gave similar inter-person numbers of CEC (Panel 1: 0.76±0.16cells/␮L; Panel 2: 0.75±0.15cells/␮L; Panel 3:

0.78±0.16cells/␮L). There was no significant difference

regarding their quantification (p-value=0.9; Mann–Whitney test),indicatingthatthesemarkerspresentedsimilarpatterns ofCECexpressioninhealthyindividuals(Figure2).However, differentclinicalconditionsmodifythisbehavior.

Discussion

Inthis study,CECnumbers wereevaluatedinhealthy indi-viduals.Aspreviouslydescribedintheliterature,theseevents howeverrare,17,27weredetectablebyflowcytometryanalysis.

(4)

Panel 1 Panel 2 Panel 3 0.00

0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50

CEC/uL

Figure2–Quantificationbyflowcytometryofcirculating endothelialcells(CEC)withdifferentendothelialmarkers

(CD144,CD146andVEGFR-2)fromhealthysubjects.

thebestcombinationofsurfacemarkersforthistask.Thus, inmany studies there is no certaintyas to whether CECs havebeencorrectlyidentified.However,CECscanbeidentified asthecells expressingendothelialmarkers(CD146, CD144, vWF,VEGFR2)intheabsenceofhematopoietic(CD45,CD14) andprogenitormarkers(CD34,CD133).15,17,29,30Several

proto-colshaveproposedtheuseofwholebloodoramononuclear concentrateobtainedafterenrichmentwithficoll paque to identifythese cells byflowcytometry. Sorting or magnetic beadscanalsobeused;however, thismethodpresentsthe samelimitationsasflowcytometry.Furthermore,theuseof magneticbeadsrarelyprovidestheprecisepurityofthe elu-triatedcellsasthemethodisgenerallyperformedwithone marker,suchasCD146.Therefore,asecondmethod,suchas fluorescencemicroscopy,isusuallyrequiredtoconfirmand quantify the CECs.17 Immunohistochemistry is not a good

optionforthesamereasonsaggravatedbytheextremerarity ofthesecellsinperipheralblood,about0.01%ofmononuclear bloodcells,17,27 and alackofstainingcould beerroneously

interpretedasafalsenegativeresult.Therefore,noneofthese possibilitieshaveemergedasthebestchoice,andaneffective comparisonofresultsbetweenlaboratoriesisdifficult.31

Furthermore,severaltechnicalissuesmustbetakeninto account inorder to truly analyze rare cells such as CECs. Thefirst stepinthe techniqueinvolves extensive cleaning andwashingprocedurestoremoveresidualcellsand parti-cles.Fluorochrome-matched isotypecontrols,currently not favoredforcommon assays,are fairlycrucialinrare event analysis,wheretheyprovideagoodestimateofnonspecific bindingofantibodiestocells.Khanetal.17mentionedthat,

evenwithfreshlydrawnperipheralblood,nonspecificbinding ofisotypecontrolsmaybedetectedin0.1–0.5%ofanalyzed cells.Inmostclinicalassays,thesenonspecific-bindings do not significantly affect data, but in the evaluation of rare cellstheydo.InCECanalysis,thesebindingscanrepresent abackground higherthan the specificcell events.Another pointis thelarge number ofcells(over 500,000) thatmust becountedtoobtainstatisticallymeaningfulnumbersofrare cells.Inthecurrentanalyses,thefirststepwastheexclusion ofCD45(+)cellsbytheSSC×CD45gate;however,asinsome

individualsthelimitbetweenpositiveandnegative popula-tionsisnotveryclear,theSSC×FSCgatewasalsoutilizedto excludediscrepantevents.Furthermore,theantigen expres-sionmay bevariableand mayinvolve othercell lineswith overlappingexpressionofantigens.Forinstance,CD146 rec-ognizeMUC18/S-endo,whichisalsoexpressedinactivatedT cells.Thus,asecondmarker, suchasCD45,wasneededto distinguishthesecells.17Thesameapproachwasadoptedfor

CD31,whichrecognizesPECAM-1presentinendothelialcells, platelets, monocytes,granulocytesand Bcells,whichwere alsoexcludedbyCD45.Anti-VEGFR2andCD144are endothe-lialcellmarkers,astheybindtotheVEGFandVE-Cadherin receptors,respectively.Inaddition,bydifferentiatingbetween mature and precursor endothelial cells, CD133 helped the identificationofCECsasastemcellmarker.CD34expression onendothelialcellsrepresentsaproblemforCECevaluationas itsexpressionisalsofoundinhematopoieticstemcells,17and

thismarkercanbeshowninmatureandimmature endothe-lialcells.32

Anotherstudyperformedwithdeepveinthrombosis(DVT) patientsandcontrolsusingthesamethreepanelsasthisstudy suggestedthattheuseofonlyonepanelmaynotbesufficient toaccuratelyanalyzeCECs.Inthisstudy,ahighersensitivity forCECdetectionwasobservedforoneofthepanels(Panel1) ratherthantheothertwo(unpublisheddata).Regardingthe resultsobtainedwithDVTpatients,wehypothesizedthatthe useoftwoormorepanelscouldincreasetheaccuracyofthe analysisundercertainclinicalconditions.Webelievethatthe expressionofsomeepitopesmaybealteredbysomediseases.

Conclusions

Anyofthesecombinationsofmarkerscanbeusedto success-fullydetermineCECsinhealthyindividualswiththeuseoftwo ormorepanelstoconfirmtheresults.Moreaccuratestudies performedwiththesecellsshouldincreaseour understand-ingregardingtheirphysiologyandinvolvementinreparative processesfavoringtheirpotentialapplicationintheclinical practice.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

Funding

FAPESPandCNPq.

Acknowledgments

(5)

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1. BouvierCAGE,CintronJR,BernhardtB,SpaetTH.Circulating endotheliumasanindicatorofvascularinjury.ThrombDiath Haemorrh.1970;40:163–8.

2. HladovecJR.Circulatingendothelialcellsisolatedtogether withplateletsandtheexperimentalmodificationoftheir countsinrats.ThrombRes.1973;3(6):665–74.

3. AsaharaT,MuroharaT,SullivanA,SilverM,vanderZeeR,Li T,etal.Isolationofputativeprogenitorendothelialcellsfor angiogenesis.Science.1997;275(5302):964–7.

4. ShiQ,RafiiS,WuMH,WijelathES,YuC,IshidaA,etal. Evidenceforcirculatingbonemarrow-derivedendothelial cells.Blood.1998;92(2):362–7.

5. PrescottMF,MullerKR.Endothelialregenerationin hypertensiveandgeneticallyhypercholesterolemicrats. Arteriosclerosis.1983;3(3):206–14.

6. TaylorRG,LewisJC.Endothelialcellproliferationand monocyteadhesiontoatheroscleroticlesionsofwhite carneaupigeons.AmJPathol.1986;125(1):152–60.

7. RafiiS,OzMC,SeldomridgeJA,FerrisB,AschAS,Nachman RL,etal.Characterizationofhematopoieticcellsarisingon thetexturedsurfaceofleftventricularassistdevices.Ann ThoracSurg.1995;60(6):1627–32.

8. KalkaC,MasudaH,TakahashiT,Kalka-MollWM,SilverM, KearneyM,etal.Transplantationofexvivoexpanded endothelialprogenitorcellsfortherapeutic

neovascularization.ProcNatlAcadSciUSA.2000;97(7):3422–7.

9. ZiegelhoefferT,FernandezB,KostinS,HeilM,VoswinckelR, HelischA,etal.Bonemarrow-derivedcellsdonotincorporate intotheadultgrowingvasculature.CircRes.2004;94(2):230–8.

10.KaushalS,AmielGE,GuleserianKJ,ShapiraOM,PerryT, SutherlandFW,etal.Functionalsmall-diameterneovessels createdusingendothelialprogenitorcellsexpandedexvivo. NatMed.2001;7(9):1035–40.

11.Dignat-GeorgeF,SampolJ.Circulatingendothelialcellsin vasculardisorders:newinsightsintoanoldconcept.EurJ Haematol.2000;65(4):215–20.

12.RafiiS,LydenD,BenezraR,HattoriK,HeissigB.Vascularand haematopoieticstemcells:noveltargetsfor

anti-angiogenesistherapy?NatRevCancer.2002;2(11):826–35.

13.DamaniS,BacconiA,LibigerO,ChourasiaAH,SerryR, GollapudiR,etal.Characterizationofcirculatingendothelial cellsinacutemyocardialinfarction.SciTranslMed. 2012;4(126):126ra33.

14.SoloveyA,LinY,BrowneP,ChoongS,WaynerE,HebbelRP. Circulatingactivatedendothelialcellsinsicklecellanemia.N EnglJMed.1997;337(22):1584–90.

15.WoywodtA,StreiberF,deGrootK,RegelsbergerH,HallerH, HaubitzM.Circulatingendothelialcellsasmarkersfor ANCA-associatedsmall-vesselvasculitis.Lancet. 2003;361(9353):206–10.

16.BullTM,GolponH,HebbelRP,SoloveyA,CoolCD,TuderRM, etal.Circulatingendothelialcellsinpulmonary

hypertension.ThrombHaemost.2003;90(4):698–703.

17.KhanSS,SolomonMA,McCoyJPJr.Detectionofcirculating endothelialcellsandendothelialprogenitorcellsbyflow cytometry.CytometryBClinCytom.2005;64(1):1–8.

18.NakataniK1,TakeshitaS,TsujimotoH,KawamuraY, TokutomiT,SekineI.Circulatingendothelialcellsin Kawasakidisease.ClinExpImmunol.2003;131(3): 536–40.

19.ButthepP,RummavasS,WisedpanichkijR,

JindadamrongwechS,FucharoenS,BunyaratvejA.Increased circulatingactivatedendothelialcells,vascularendothelial growthfactor,andtumornecrosisfactorinthalassemia.AmJ Hematol.2002;70(2):100–6.

20.BeerepootLV,MehraN,VermaatJS,ZonnenbergBA,Gebbink MF,VoestEE.Increasedlevelsofviablecirculatingendothelial cellsareanindicatorofprogressivediseaseincancer patients.AnnOncol.2004;15(1):139–45.

21.VapaataloH,MervaalaE.Clinicallyimportantfactors influencingendothelialfunction.MedSciMonit. 2001;7(5):1075–85.

22.KörblingM,ReubenJM,GaoH,LeeBN,HarrisDM,CogdellD, etal.Recombinanthumangranulocyte-colony-stimulating factor-mobilizedandapheresis-collectedendothelial progenitorcells:anovelbloodcellcomponentfortherapeutic vasculogenesis.Transfusion(Paris).2006;46(10):1795–802.

23.MancusoP,BurliniA,PruneriG,GoldhirschA,MartinelliG, BertoliniF.Restingandactivatedendothelialcellsare increasedintheperipheralbloodofcancerpatients.Blood. 2001;97(11):3658–61.

24.MancusoP,CalleriA,CassiC,GobbiA,CapilloM,PruneriG, etal.Circulatingendothelialcellsasanovelmarkerof angiogenesis.AdvExpMedBiol.2003;522:83–97.

25.GoonPK,BoosCJ,StonelakePS,BlannAD,LipGY.Detection andquantificationofmaturecirculatingendothelialcells usingflowcytometryandimmunomagneticbeads:a methodologicalcomparison.ThrombHaemost. 2006;96(1):45–52.

26.GoonPK,BoosCJ,LipGY.Circulatingendothelialcells: markersofvasculardysfunction.ClinLab.

2005;51(9–10):531–8.

27.Dignat-GeorgeF,SampolJ,LipG,BlannAD.Circulating endothelialcells:realitiesandpromisesinvasculardisorders. PathophysiolHaemostThromb.2004;33(5–6):495–9.

28.TimmermansF,PlumJ,YöderMC,IngramDA, VandekerckhoveB,CaseJ.Endothelialprogenitorcells: identitydefined?JCellMolMed.2009;13(1):87–102.

29.PeichevM,NaiyerAJ,PereiraD,ZhuZ,LaneWJ,WilliamsM, etal.ExpressionofVEGFR-2andAC133bycirculatinghuman CD34(+)cellsidentifiesapopulationoffunctionalendothelial precursors.Blood.2000;95(February(3)):952–8.

30.JacquesN,VimondN,ConfortiR,GriscelliF,LecluseY, LaplancheA,etal.Quantificationofcirculatingmature endothelialcellsusingawholebloodfour-colorflow cytometricassay.JImmunolMethods.2008;337(2): 132–43.

31.MancusoP,BertoliniF.Circulatingendothelialcellsas biomarkersinclinicaloncology.MicrovascRes. 2010;79(3):224–8.

32.HarhouriK,KebirA,GuilletB,Foucault-BertaudA,Voytenko S,Piercecchi-MartiMD,etal.SolubleCD146displays angiogenicpropertiesandpromotesneovascularizationin experimentalhind-limbischemia.Blood.

Imagem

Table 1 – Monoclonal antibodies employed in circulating endothelial cells analyses.
Figure 1 – Analysis strategy for the identification of mature circulating endothelial cells (CEC) by flow cytometry
Figure 2 – Quantification by flow cytometry of circulating endothelial cells (CEC) with different endothelial markers (CD144, CD146 and VEGFR-2) from healthy subjects.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

This population sample includes patients with clinical suspicion of hemoglobinopathies and their family members, randomly chosen individuals who had blood tests and blood donors

Table 5 – The hypothetical hemoglobin concentration for poor performance status and hematopoietic cell transplantation-comorbidity index of patients with myeloid neoplasms.

The most common hematological abnormality of the SLE classification criteria in a cohort of Brazilian SLE patients was leukopenia followed by thrombocytopenia, lymphopenia and

Hemoglobin D-Punjab can be inherited in heterozygosis with hemoglobin A causing no clinical or hematological alterations, or in homozygosis, the rarest form of inheritance, a

During obstetric care, another morphological obstetric USG revealed a non-ectopic pregnancy with an echographic age of 19.1 weeks – in addition to an abdominal USG, which showed a

Heterogeneous geographic distribution of human T cell lymphotropic viruses I and II (HTLV1/2): serological screening prevalence rates in blood donors from large urban areas in

5 Thus, due to differential treatment, the aim of this study was to report a case of hairy cell leukemia variant and cover some aspects related to the differential diagnosis between

Autologous nonmyeloablative hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with severe anti-TNF refractory Crohn disease: long-term follow-up. Hommes DW, Duijvestein M,