D isponible e n ca st e lla no/ D isponíve l e m língua por t ugue sa SciELO Br a sil w w w .scie lo.br / r la e
VI OLENCE AGAI NST W OMEN: THEORETI CAL REFLECTI ONS
Let icia Casique Casique1
Ant onia Regina Fer r eir a Fur egat o2
Casique Casique L, Fur egat o ARF. Violence against w om en: t heor et ical r eflect ions. Rev Lat ino- am Enfer m agem
2 0 0 6 n ov em br o- dezem br o; 1 4 ( 6 ) : 9 5 0 - 6 .
Violence appear s in differ ent for m s and cir cum st ances and involves dist inct kinds of violent act s against
childr en, w om en, elder ly and ot her defenseless per sons. This ser ious pr oblem , w hich degr ades w om en’s int egr it y,
is denot ed by t er m s like dom est ic v iolence, gender v iolence and v iolence against w om en. Gender v iolence can
appear as ph y sical, psy ch ological, sex u al, econ om ic v iolen ce, as w ell as v iolen ce at w or k . Violen ce again st
w om en com m it t ed by t heir int im at e par t ner s can be analyzed t hr ough t he Ecological Model, w hich explains t he
close r elat ion bet w een in div idu als an d t h eir en v ir on m en t . Fact or s in f lu en cin g people’s beh av ior t ow ar ds t h is
v iolence should be analy zed w it h a v iew t o est ablishing help pr ogr am s.
DESCRI PTORS: v iolence; m ent al healt h; nur sing; gender ident it y ; w om en
VI OLENCI A CONTRA MUJERES: REFLEXI ONES TEÓRI CAS
La v iolen cia se m an if iest a de dif er en t es f or m as, en dist in t as cir cu n st an cias y con div er sos t ipos de
act os d ir ig id os a n iñ os, m u j er es, an cian os y ot r as p er son as in d ef en sas. Violen cia d om est ica, v iolen cia d e
gener o y v iolencia cont r a m uj er es son t ér m inos ut ilizados par a denom inar est e gr av e pr oblem a que degr ada
la in t egr idad de la m u j er . La v iolen cia de gén er o pu ede m an if est ar se a t r av és de v iolen cia f ísica, v iolen cia
psicológica, v iolencia sex ual, v iolencia económ ica y v iolencia en el t r abaj o. La v iolencia sufr ida por la m uj er
por par t e de su com pañer o ínt im o puede ser analizada a t r av és del Modelo Ecológico que ex plica la est r echa
r elación ent r e el individuo y su ent or no. Se concluyo que es im por t ant e analizar los fact or es que influyen en el
com por t am ient o de las per sonas fr ent e a la v iolencia par a est ablecer pr ogr am as de ay uda.
DESCRI PTORES: v iolen cia; salu d m en t al; en fer m er ía; ident idad de géner o; m uj er es
VI OLÊN CI A CON TRA MULHERES: REFLEXÕES TEÓRI CAS
A v iolên cia m an if est a- se de dif er en t es f or m as, em dist in t as cir cu n st ân cias e com div er sos t ipos de
at os v iolen t os d ir ig id os a cr ian ças, m u lh er es, id osos e ou t r os in d ef esos. Violên cia d om ést ica, v iolên cia d e
gêner o e v iolência cont r a m ulher es são t er m os ut ilizados par a denom inar est e gr av e pr oblem a que degr ada a
int egr idade da m ulher . A violência de gêner o pode m anifest ar - se at r avés de violência física, violência psicológica,
v iolência sex ual, v iolência econôm ica e v iolência no t r abalho. A v iolência sofr ida pela m ulher por par t e de seu
com pan h eir o in t im o pode ser an alisada at r av és do Modelo Ecológico, qu e ex plica a est r eit a r elação en t r e o
indiv íduo e seu ent or no. Concluiu- se que é im por t ant e analisar os fat or es que influem no com por t am ent o das
pessoas fr ent e à v iolência par a se est abelecer pr ogr am as de aj uda.
DESCRI TORES: v iolên cia; saú de m en t al; en fer m agem ; iden t idade de gên er o; m u lh er es
1 PhD in Nursing, Facult y m em ber at t he Celaya Facult y of Nursing and Obst et rics/ Universit y of Guanaj uat o- Mexico; 2 Full Professor, e- m ail furegat o@eerp.usp.br.
THEORETI CAL REFLECTI ONS
T
h e t er m v i ol en ce d er i v es f r om t h e Lat i n w or d vis, w hich m eans for ce and r efer s t o t he not ionsof con st r ain t an d u sin g p h y sical su p er ior it y on t h e
ot her per son. Violence is m ut ant , as it is influenced
b y v er y d if f er en t t im es, p laces, cir cu m st an ces an d
r ealit ies. Ther e is t oler at ed and condem ned v iolence,
as violence has exist ed on Ear t h as long as m ankind,
assu m in g differ en t , in cr easin gly com plex an d at t h e
sam e t im e m or e fr agm ent ed and ar t iculat ed for m s( 1).
Violence is an ext r em ely diffuse and com plex
phenom enon, w hose definit ion cannot be scient ifically
e x a ct , si n ce i t i s a m a t t e r o f a p p r e ci a t i o n , i t i s
in f lu en ced b y cu lt u r e an d su b m it t ed t o con t in u ou s
r eview t o t he ext ent t hat social values and st andar ds
ev olv e( 2 ).
Th e fem in ist m ov em en t in t h e ear ly secon d
h a l f o f t h e p a s t c e n t u r y s t o o d o u t b e c a u s e i t
denounced cases of v iolence against w om en, cast ing
l i g h t o n a r ea l i t y t h a t , u n t i l t h en , h a d o n l y b een
m ent ioned in t he privat e sphere. Violence in t he hom e
con t ex t con t in u ed w it h ou t an y body doin g or say in g
an y t h i n g . Un t i l t h at t i m e, i t h ad n o t b een o p en l y
m anifest ed and w as suppor t ed by cont em por ar y social
condit ions( 1 ).
Th e s u m m a r y o f d i f f e r e n t i n t e r n a t i o n a l
co n f er en ces h el d i n t h e 2 0t h cen t u r y co n t ai n s t h e
pr oposit ions and definit ions of m inim al hum an r ight s
f o r a l l p e o p l e o n t h e p l a n e t , w h i ch u n d o u b t e d l y
af f ect ed t h e d et ect ion an d in v est ig at ion of g en d er
v iolen ce ag ain st w om en . Th ese con v en t ion s w er e:
Char t er of t he Unit ed Nat ions ( 1945) ; Conv ent ion on
genocide ( 1948) ; I nt er nat ional cov enant on civ il and
p o l i t i ca l r i g h t s ( 1 9 6 6 ) ; I n t er n a t i o n a l co v en a n t o n
e c o n o m i c , s o c i a l a n d c u l t u r a l r i g h t s ( 1 9 6 6 ) ;
I nt ernat ional convent ion on t he elim inat ion of all form s
of r acial d iscr im in at ion ( 1 9 6 5 ) ; Con v en t ion on t h e
e l i m i n a t i o n o f a l l f o r m s o f d i scr i m i n a t i o n a g a i n st
w om en ( 1979) ; Convent ion against Tor t ur e and Ot her
Cr u e l , I n h u m a n o r D e g r a d i n g Tr e a t m e n t o r
Punishm ent ( 1984) ; Conv ent ion on t he r ight s of t he
child ( 1989) ; and t he I nt er - Am er ican Conv ent ion on
t he prevent ion, punishm ent and eradicat ion of violence
a g a i n s t w o m e n - Co n v e n t i o n o f B e l é m d o Pa r á
( 1994)( 3).
Th e s e c o n v e n t i o n s e s t a b l i s h e d l e g a l
f r am ew or k s t o p r ot ect h u m an r ig h t s, w it h p osit iv e
r ep er cu ssion s f or t h e ad v an ced u n d er st an d in g an d
er adicat ion of v iolence against w om en.
Gen der v iolen ce w as in f lu en ced by f em in ist
g r o u p s f r o m West er n co u n t r i es, w h i ch d en o u n ced
p e o p l e w h o d e g r a d e w o m e n ’ s d i g n i t y t h r o u g h
violence( 4). As a result of t he ident ificat ion of violence
against w om en, fem inist gr oups hav e been j oined by
o t h e r a c t o r s , s u c h a s h u m a n r i g h t s d e f e n s e
a sso ci a t i o n s a n d i n t er n a t i o n a l o r g a n i za t i o n s, w h o
analyze and at t em pt t o help decr easing t he pr oblem .
I n or der t o u n der st an d t h e gen der v iolen ce
designat ion, w e need t o t ak e int o account t he social
char act er of t r ait s at t r ibut ed t o m en and w om en. Most
fem ale and m ale t rait s are cult ural const ruct ions. They
ar e pr oduct s of societ y and do not necessar ily der ive
fr om nat ur e( 4).
Gender v iolence is ex er cised by m en against
w om en , in w h ich t h e ag g r essor ’s an d t h e v ict im ’s
gender ar e closely connect ed w it h t he ex planat ion of
t his violence. Thus, it affect s w om en due t o t he sim ple
fact of being w om en, t hat is, it is violence perpet rat ed
by m en t o m aint ain cont r ol and dom inion over w om en.
Men ’ s r o l es a n d b eh a v i o r s a r e co n si d er ed
s o c i a l l y m o r e v a l u a b l e . Fo r e x a m p l e , c r y i n g i s
d i s d a i n e d , v i o l e n t r e s p o n s e s a r e l o o k e d u p o n
p o si t i v el y, an d h o u sew o r k ( al t h o u g h f u n d am en t al )
r em ains alm ost unnot iced t o m en, alt hough j ust ifying
t hat it is car r ied out by w om en( 5).
Th e g e n d e r c a t e g o r y p r e s u p p o s e s t h e
u n d er st an d in g of r elat ion s est ab lish ed b et w een t h e
sexes in societ y, differ ent iat ing bet w een biological and
social sex . Wh ile b iolog ical sex r ef er s t o an at om
ic-ph y siological dif f er en ces bet w een m en an d w om en ,
social sex is r elat ed t o how t hese differ ences behav e
in differ ent societ ies t hr oughout hist or y( 6).
I n all cult ur es acr oss t he w or ld, w om en liv e
in socially u n eq u al con d it ion s t ow ar d s m en . Th ese
i n e q u a l i t i e s a cq u i r e d i f f e r e n t m a n i f e st a t i o n s a n d
m ag n it u d es.
Th e def in it ion of gen der im plies t w o lev els,
t h at is, g en d er as a con st it u t iv e elem en t of social
r elat ion s, based on per cept ible dif f er en ces bet w een
t h e t w o s e x e s ; a n d g e n d e r a s a b a s i c f o r m o f
represent ing power relat ions, in which dom inant act ions
ar e pr esent ed as nat ur al and unquest ionable( 6).
I nt er nat ional concer ns about t he phenom enon
o f v i o l en ce a g a i n st w o m en d em a n d a n a l y ses a n d
st udies about t he issue, as t his v iolence det er ior at es
w om en ’s in d iv id u al an d f am ily h ealt h . Wom en w h o
r esist against an abusiv e r elat ion indefinit ely end up
losin g t h eir in div idu al ( ph y sical an d m en t al) h ealt h ,
Th e U n i t e d N a t i o n s c o n v e n t i o n o n t h e
Er adicat ion of v iolence against w om en, w hich t he UN
Gener al Assem bly adopt ed in 1993, defined v iolence
as any act of gender - based violence t hat pr oduces or
ca n p r o d u ce p h y si ca l , se x u a l o r m e n t a l h a r m o r
su f f er in g in w om en , in clu d in g t h r eat s, coer cion or
ar bit r ar y pr iv at ion of fr eedom in public as w ell as in
pr iv at e life( 7).
FORMS OF VI OLEN CE AGAI N ST W OMEN
Dif f er en t f or m s of g en d er v iolen ce in clu d e
int rafam ily or dom est ic violence and violence at w ork,
m anifest ed t hr ough phy sical, psy chological and social
ag g r ession s.
I nt r afam ily v iolence is a for m m any w om en
a r e su b m i t t e d t o , w h i ch o r i g i n a t e s a m o n g f a m i l y
m em ber s, independent ly of w het her t he aggr essor is
sh ar in g t h e sam e h om e or n ot . Aggr ession s in clu de
v iolat ion, phy sical, psy chological and econom ic abuse
and can som et im es culm inat e in t he abused w om an’s
d e a t h . Ha b i t u a l p sy ch o l o g i ca l , se x u a l o r p h y si ca l
violence occurs am ong affect ively relat ed people, such
as husband and w ife, or adult s against m inor s or aged
people w it hin a fam ily.
Abuse is char act er ized by t he set of conduct s
t hat int ent ionally cause phy sical har m , pain or inj ur y
t o anot her per son( 8). I t includes act s ranging from slaps
t o sev er e inj ur ies t hat can cause deat h.
Violence m anifest s it self physically as w ell as
t h r ou gh all t h ose for m s in w h ich people’s in div idu al
g u a r a n t e e s a r e o p p r e s s e d , m a d e i m p o s s i b l e o r
v iolat ed. Hence, all definit ions agr ee t hat v iolence is
any act against w om en’s dignit y, independent ly of it s
or ig in s.
D o m e s t i c v i o l e n c e , g e n d e r v i o l e n c e a n d
v iolen ce again st w om en ar e t er m s u sed t o n am e a
s e v e r e p r o b l e m( 9 ). I n d o m e s t i c v i o l e n c e , t h e
aggr ession com es fr om t he par t ner or anot her fam ily
m em b er, m ov in g b ey on d h ou se w alls an d af f ect in g
el d er l y, ch i l d r en a n d d i sa b l ed p er so n s. I n g en d er
v iolen ce, t h e ag g r essor s ar e p er son s close t o t h eir
v ict im s, an d ag g r ession s occu r in p r iv at e or p u b lic
sp a ces.
One of t he m ost com m on for m s of v iolence
ag ain st w om en is com m it t ed b y t h eir h u sb an d s or
int im at e par t ner s( 10). The fact is t hat , generally, w om en
ar e em ot ion ally in v olv ed w it h t h eir ag g r essor s an d
econ om ically d ep en d en t on t h em . Th is v iolen ce b y
i n t i m a t e p a r t n e r s o c c u r s i n a l l c o u n t r i e s ,
in d ep en d en t ly of t h e social, econ om ic, r elig iou s or
cu lt u r al gr ou p.
Violence by husbands or int im at e par t ner s is
co m m i t t e d a g a i n st t h e “ w e a k se x ” . Th e se ca se s
in clu de m ish an dled w om en . Th is t y pe of abu se h as
also been fr equent in hom osex ual r elat ions. Thus, a
lar g e m aj or it y of cases of p ar t n er ab u se h as b een
com m it t ed by m en against t heir “ par t ner ”( 11).
Gen der v iolen ce boils dow n t o t h e r esu lt of
m ale dom inat ion and fem ale subor dinat ion r elat ions,
in w hich t he m an int ends t o avoid t he w om an’s escape
because he does not w ant t o divor ce her, keeping her
subj ect t o a subm ission she cannot escape fr om( 4).
B a s e d o n e x p e r t s ’ a f f i r m a t i o n s , w e c a n
su m m ar ize t h at g en d er v iolen ce is con cen t r at ed in
individual aggressions t hat go beyond t he social level,
u n d ou b t ed ly r ef lect in g on e g r ou p ’s d om in at ion an d
an ot h er ’s su bor din at ion .
St u dies h av e em ph asized t h e pr ev alen ce of
t he int r afam ily v iolence phenom enon and associat ed
r isk fact or s. Condit ioning fact or s have been appoint ed
in different levels of analysis, ranging from social and
cult ur al aspect s ( aut hor it ar ian and pat r iar chal v alues,
accept ance of violence as a w ay t o solve differ ences,
et hnic gr oups) , gender ( v aluat ion of v iolence in m ale
r o l e p e r f o r m a n c e , a c c e p t a n c e o f v i o l e n c e a n d
p u n i sh m en t as a w ay t o so l v e co u p l es’ co n f l i ct s) ,
psy chological aspect s ( gr eat er im pulsiv eness, alcohol
and dr ugs use) t o ( par ent s’, v ict im s’ or a m ist r eat ed
couple’s ) childhood ex per iences of v iolence( 12).
Violen ce ag ain st w om en an d g ir ls in clu d es
physical m ist reat m ent , as w ell as sexual, psychological
an d econ om ic abu se. Again , it can be affir m ed t h at
“ g e n d e r - b a se d ” v i o l e n ce d e v e l o p s a s a r e su l t o f
w om en’s subor dinat e condit ion in societ y( 11).
Tw o of t h e m ost com m on for m s of v iolen ce
again st w om en ar e abu se by in t im at e par t n er s an d
f or ced sex u al act iv it y, w h ich occu r in ch ild h ood as
w ell as adolescence or adult life. Abuse by an int im at e
p a r t n e r, a l s o k n o w n a s d o m e s t i c v i o l e n c e ,
m ist r eat m ent or aggr ession against t he w ife, is alm ost
alw ay s accom pan ied by psy ch ological abu se an d, in
m ost cases, by for ced sex ual r elat ions. A m aj or it y of
w o m e n m i s t r e a t e d b y t h e i r p a r t n e r s s u f f e r
aggressions. I n fact , abusive relat ions usually develop
in an at m ospher e of fear and even t er r or.
I n indust r ialized count r ies, for m s of v iolence
ar e not t he sam e for all couples ex per iencing v iolent
1 . A s e v e r e a n d g r o w i n g f o r m o f v i o l e n c e ,
char act er ized by differ ent for m s of abuse, t er r or and
t hr eat s, accom panied by incr easingly possessiv e and
cont r olling behav ior s by t he abuser.
2 . A m o r e m o d e r a t e f o r m o f v i o l e n c e i n t h e
r elat ion sh ip , w h er e con st an t f r u st r at ion an d an g er
occasion ally er u pt in ph y sical aggr ession .
Accor ding t o t he st udy by Casique( 13), gender violence
per pet r at ed by int im at e par t ner s against w om en can
m an if est it self t h r ou g h p h y sical act s, p sy ch olog ical
v iolence, as w ell as social act s inv olv ing t he v iolent
sit uat ions w om en liv e in.
Ph y sical ag g r ession
Th is t y pe of v iolen ce again st w om en is t h e
m ost ev ident and difficult t o hide, as it affect s t heir
phy sical appear ance. Wom en suffer ing som e k ind of
physical aggr ession m ost ly exper ience num er ous act s
of v iolence ov er t im e.
Physical violence is underst ood as any act ion
im ply ing t he use of for ce against w om en of any age
an d in an y cir cu m st an ce, w h ich can m an if est it self
t hrough blows, kicks, pinches, bit es, t hrowing of obj ect s,
pushes, slaps, spankings, st ab wounds, scrat ches, hit s
on t h e h ead , in j u r ies, b u r n s, f r act u r es, ab d om in al
inj uries and any ot her act against t heir physical int egrity,
producing m arks on t heir body or not( 13,14,15).
Psy ch olog ical ag g r ession
Th i s t y p e o f v i o l e n ce i s m o r e d i f f i cu l t t o
det ect , as v ict im s pr esent psy chological scar e, w hich
ar e m or e difficult t o obser v e and pr ov e( 16).
Psy ch olog ical or em ot ion al v iolen ce occu r s
b y r ej ect i n g car esses, t h r eat en i n g t o b eat u p t h e
w om an and her childr en, im peding t he w om an t o w or k,
have friends or go out ; t he par t ner, in t ur n, t ells her
about his am or ous advent ur es and, at t he sam e t im e,
accuses her of hav ing lov er s.
A st udy carried out in Chile ident ified diverse
m anifest at ions of psy chological v iolence, classified as
follow s( 16) :
- Ve r b a l a b u s e : h u m b l i n g , i n s u l t i n g , r i d i c u l i n g ,
hum iliat ing, using m ent al gam es and ironies t o cause
con f u sion
- I n t i m i d a t i o n : s c a r i n g w i t h l o o k s , g e s t u r e s o r
scr eam s; t h r ow in g obj ect s or dest r oy in g pr oper t y
- Th r ea t s: t o h u r t , k i l l , co m m i t su i ci d e, t a k e t h e
childr en w it h him
- I solat ion: abusiv e cont r ol of t he ot her per son’s life
by w at ching ov er her act s and m ov em ent s, list ening
t o her conver sat ion, im peding t hat she m akes fr iends
- Disdain: t r eat ing t he ot her per son as infer ior, m aking
im por t ant decisions w it hout consult ing t he ot her
- Econom ic abuse: abusive financial cont rol, im posing
m o n e t a r y r e w a r d s o r p u n i sh m e n t s, i m p e d i n g t h e
w o m a n f r o m g o i n g o u t t o w o r k a l t h o u g h t h i s i s
n ecessar y f or f am ily m ain t en an ce
I t is im p or t an t t o h ig h lig h t t h at v ict im s of
psy chological v iolence oft en t hink t hat w hat happens
t o t h em is n ot su f f icien t ly sev er e an d im por t an t t o
decide on at t it u des t o im pede t h ese act s, in clu din g
denouncing t hem t o com pet ent or gans. Som e v ict im s
believ e t h at t h ey w ou ld n ot be cr edit w or t h y if t h ey
denounced t heir aggr essor. I n ot her cases, som eone
t he w om an r espect t ells her t hat she should cont inue
in t h is abu siv e r elat ion for t h e good of h er ch ildr en
o r t o g u a r a n t e e t h e r i g h t s a c q u i r e d t h r o u g h
m ar r iag e( 1 6 ).
M a n y w o m e n d o n o t d a r e t a l k i n g o r
denouncing t hat t hey ar e vict im s of m ist r eat m ent , out
of fear of t he aggr essor s’ t hr eat s against t hem selv es
and t heir r elat iv es.
Ma n y i n d i r e ct m a n i f e st a t i o n s o f v i o l e n ce
com pr ise t h e so- called “ dest r u ct iv e act s”, w h ich ar e
f or m s of aggr ession or psy ch ological pr essu r e u sed
b y a m an in a con f lict in g r elat ion sh ip , m ak in g t h e
w om an ’s fr ee cir cu lat ion im possible.
Social ag g r ession
No con sen su al d ef in it ion w as f ou n d am on g
t he m ain aut hor s st udy ing v iolence. How ever, in t his
st udy, socia l v iole n ce was consider ed as any act ion
t hat im pair s w om en, im posed by conduct s or at t it udes
of accept an ce or r ej ect ion w h ich societ y est ablish es
as adequat e in view of t he violence w om en suffer, as
w ell as t h e social con dit ion s in v olv in g t h e sit u at ion
t he v iolence v ict im liv es in.
Th e v iolen ce w om en ar e v ict im s of h as n ot
com e ou t in t o t h e op en , d u e t o t h e f act t h at it is
considered as som et hing nat ural and privat e. Violence
is r ein f or ced by r eligion s an d gov er n m en t s t h r ou gh
st andar ds and codes. This gener at es m yt hs and beliefs
t hat are not alw ays in conform it y w it h current realit y,
a l t h o u g h so ci e t y h a s l e g i t i m a t e d t h e m , a t so m e
m o m e n t , d u e t o n o t a l w a y s v e r y c l e a r l y k n o w n
m ot iv es( 17). Popular m y t hs and beliefs about v iolence
- Violen ce is n at u r al, it h as alw ay s ex ist ed an d w ill
alw ay s ex ist
- Hom e is a pr iv at e space, in w h ich n obody sh ou ld
in t er f er e
- Violence occurs in low social classes, w here povert y
and low educat ion lev els pr ev ail
- Alcohol and v iolence pr ov ok e episodes of v iolence
- Th e ag g r essor is v iolen t in all of h is act ion s an d
in t er per son al r elat ion s
- I f t he v iolent m an show s r egr et or apologizes, t his
w ill allow him t o change his abusiv e behav ior
- Beat ing is a pr oof of lov e “ I spank y ou because I
lov e y ou ”
- Man can neit her cont rol his im pulses nor handle his
p assi on s
- The aggr essor is m ent ally ill
- M i s t r e a t e d w o m e n c a n a b a n d o n t h e i r h o m e s
w henev er t hey w ant t o
- Wom en sh ou ld st ay w it h t h eir par t n er s u n der any
cir cu m st an ce, so t h at t h eir dau gh t er s an d son s can
gr ow up t oget her w it h t heir fat her
- The sit uat ion is going t o change for t he w om an, it is
j ust a m at t er of w ait ing, doing one’s best and being
m or e com p r eh en siv e
- Wom en like t o suffer
- I f t her e is no j ealousy, t her e ex ist s no lov e in t he
co u p l e
- Wom an cannot escape fr om v iolence
Now aday s, w om en incr easingly par t icipat e in
eco n o m i c act i v i t i es. Th ei r i n ser t i o n i n t o t h e l ab o r
m ar k et h as p r ov ok ed social ch an g es in p r od u ct iv e
i n s t i t u t i o n s a n d h o m e s . N e v e r t h e l e s s , j o b
d i s c r i m i n a t i o n c o n t i n u e s , d e v a l u i n g w o m e n a n d
av oid in g t h eir ascen sion . Th u s, t h e f am ily p r ov id er
r o l e i s b e i n g c h a n g e d b y w o m e n ’ s e c o n o m i c
independence, w hich undoubt edly affect s her funct ions
at h om e, a f act m en t r adit ion ally ar e n ot w illin g t o
accep t .
So ci a l cl a ss i s a n i m p o r t a n t f a ct o r i n t h e
p h y sical ag g r ession p h en om en on . Th is m ean s t h at
t h e u n d e r e m p l o y e d cl a ss sh o u l d r e ce i v e sp e ci a l
at t en t i o n i n i n t er v en t i o n st r at eg i es r el at ed t o t h e
pr oblem , con sequ en t ly decr easin g v iolen ce st at ist ics
t hat dir ect ly affect w om en( 18).
CON SEQUEN CES OF VI OLEN CE
Th e v iolen ce pr act iced by in t im at e par t n er s
affect s w om en ’s ph y sical an d em ot ion al h ealt h( 1 0 , 1 5 ).
Som e h ealt h con seq u en ces n eed t o b e m en t ion ed ,
r esult ing fr om violence pr act iced by int im at e par t ner s.
- Ph y sical: ab d om in al or t h or acic in j u r ies, b r u ises,
ed em a s a n d h em a t o m a s, ch r o n i c p a i n sy n d r o m e,
in v alid it y, f ib r om y alg ias, f r act u r es, g ast r oin t est in al
disor der s, headache, abdom inal pain, ir r it able bow el
sy n d r o m e , b u r n s, l a ce r a t i o n s a n d a b r a si o n s, e y e
dam age, r educed physical funct ioning, chr onic fat igue,
abr upt w eight changes.
- Sex u al an d r epr odu ct iv e: gy n ecological disor der s,
p er sist en t v ag in al f low , g en it al b leed in g , in f er t ilit y,
c h r o n i c p e l v i c i n f l a m m a t o r y d i s e a s e , p r e g n a n c y
c o m p l i c a t i o n s , s p o n t a n e o u s a b o r t i o n , s e x u a l
dysfunct ion, sexually t r ansm issible diseases, including
HI V/ AI D S, u n sa f e a b o r t i o n , u n w a n t ed p r eg n a n cy,
delay ed int r aut er ine dev elopm ent , fet al and m at er nal
d eat h .
- Psy ch ol og i cal an d b eh av i or al : al coh ol an d d r u g s
abuse, depr ession, anxiet y, eat ing and sleep disor der s,
feelings of sham e and guilt , phobic disor der s and panic
sy ndr om e, phy sical inact iv it y, low self est eem , post
-t r a u m a -t i c s -t r e s s d i s o r d e r s , s m o k i n g , s u i c i d a l
b e h a v i o r s a n d s e l f - p u n i s h m e n t , u n s a f e s e x u a l
b eh av ior.
Violen ce again st w om en , especially by t h eir
par t ner s, r epr esent s a bur den t o healt h ser v ices due
t o t he cost s it generat es. This violence does not only
cause phy sical and psy chological dam age t o w om en,
bu t also im plies r isk s f or t h eir ch ildr en . Wit n essin g
v iolen ce in sid e t h e f am ily in cr eases p r ob ab ilit ies of
depr ession, anx iet y, behav ioral disor der s and delayed
c o g n i t i v e d e v e l o p m e n t i n c h i l d r e n . Mo r e o v e r, i t
incr eases t he r isk t hat t hey w ill t ur n int o v ict im s of
m ist r eat m en t or f u t u r e aggr essor s t h em selv es.
THE ECOLOGI CAL MODEL
One t heor et ical base t o under st and v iolence
a g a i n s t w o m e n i s t h e Ec o l o g i c a l Mo d e l( 1 9 ). Th i s
p r o p o sa l i s b a sed o n d i f f er en t a u t h o r s’ w o r k a n d
pr oposes “ an in t egr at ed ecological f r am ew or k ” w it h
a view t o st udying and get t ing t o know violence against
w o m en .
Th e ecolog ical m od el st u d ies f act or s act iv e
i n f o u r d i s t i n c t s p h e r e s : i n d i v i d u a l , f a m i l y,
com m unit ar ian and sociocult ur al, as show n in Figur e
1 . This m odel focuses on v iolence in t he int er act ion
a m o n g i t s d i st i n ct l e v e l s. Th e se a r e su p e r p o si n g
det er m inant , but an int er act ion of oper at ing fact or s,
fav or ing v iolence or pr ot ect ing t he indiv idual against
it . These causal fact ors and t heir int eract ions need t o
b e k n o w n i n t h e i r d i st i n ct co n t e x t s a n d cu l t u r a l
en v ir on m en t s. Th is k n ow ledge h elps t o iden t if y t h e
f r a g i l e p o i n t s a n d r o a d s t o a d v a n c e i n v i o l e n c e
pr ev ent ion and specific int er v ent ions( 8).
- The fourt h level is direct ed at general fact ors, relat ed
t o t h e st r u ct u r e of societ y . Th ese fact or s con t r ibu t e
t o cr eat e a clim at e t h at in cit es or in h ibit s v iolen ce,
such as t he possibilit y of obt aining arm s due t o social
and cult ur al st andar ds. These include st andar ds t hat
p r ior it ize p ar en t s’ r ig h t s ov er t h eir ch ild r en ’s w
ell-being, consider suicide as a personal opt ion m ore t han
a s a p r e v e n t a b l e a ct o f v i o l e n ce , r e a f f i r m m e n ’ s
dom inion ov er w om en and boy s, back t he ex cessiv e
use of police force against cit izens or support polit ical
conflict s. This level also includes ot her fact s, such as
sa n i t a r y, eco n o m i c, ed u ca t i v e a n d so ci a l p o l i ci es,
w h i ch co n t r i b u t e t o m a i n t a i n e co n o m i c o r so ci a l
in equ alit ies am on g gr ou ps.
Figur e 1 show s t he super posit ion of differ ent
r i n g s, i l l u st r a t i n g h o w f a ct o r s a t d i f f e r e n t l e v e l s
r ein f or ce or m od if y each ot h er. Th u s, f or ex am p le,
t h e p r o b a b i l i t y t h a t a p e r so n w i t h a n a g g r e ssi v e
p e r s o n a l i t y w i l l a c t v i o l e n t l y i n s i d e a f a m i l y o r
com m u n it y t h at is u sed t o solv in g con f lict s t h r ou gh
v i o l en ce i s h i g h er t h a n i f h e i s i n a m o r e p a ci f i c
en v ir on m en t .
Violence against w om en is incr easingly faced
as an im por t ant public healt h pr oblem . Thus, t her e is
a n u r g e n t n e e d t o e st a b l i sh e a r l y d e t e ct i o n a n d
ef f ect iv e in t er v en t ion pr ogr am s.
Ther e is a w ider offer of v ict im suppor t and
p r o t e ct i o n se r v i ce s, p r o v i d i n g o r i e n t a t i o n s, l e g a l
adv ice, edu cat iv e an d w or k t r ain in g. Som e of t h ese
d e v e l o p a l t e r n a t i v e s e r v i c e s , d i r e c t e d a t t h e
ag g r esso r s, as p h y si cal v i o l en ce ex er t s eco n o m i c,
m or bidit y and m or t alit y r eper cussions in differ ent age
g r ou p s.
CONCLUSI ONS
Violen ce can be pr esen t in all sph er es of a
w om an’s life and can m anifest it self in different form s
and circum st ances t hrough it s evolut ive cycle ( physical
v iolence, psy chological v iolence and social v iolence) .
I t is r einfor ced by r eligions and gover nm ent s t hr ough
st an dar ds an d codes.
Many exper t s analyze violence and all of t hem
ag r ee t h at t h is p h en om en on d et er ior at es w om en ’s
in t egr it y, giv in g r ise t o def icien t h ealt h , f am ily an d
s o c i a l g r o u p d i s o r d e r. A m o n g c o n s e q u e n c e s f o r
w o m e n ’ s h e a l t h , p h y s i c a l a n d p s y c h o l o g i c a l
com p l i cat i on s st an d ou t , w h i ch p r od u ce i m p or t an t
d isab ilit ies in w om en , w it h ou t f or g et t in g ab ou t t h e
5QEKGV[ %QOOWPKV[ 4GNCVKQPU +PFKXKFWCN
Figur e 1 - The Ecological Model t o under st and violence
- Sour ce: OPS/ OMS, 2002
The m ain point in t he m odel is t hat it helps t o
a c k n o w l e d g e a n d d i s t i n g u i s h b e t w e e n c o u n t l e s s
f act or s in f lu en cin g v iolen ce an d, at t h e sam e t im e,
pr ovides a fr am ew or k t o under st and how it s differ ent
elem ent s int eract . The First World Report on Violence
and Healt h t r ies t o under st and t he m ult ifacet ed nat ur e
of v iolence t hr ough t his m odel( 2).
The ecological m odel, classified in four levels,
m ak es it possible t o an aly ze t h e f act or s in f lu en cin g
p e o p l e ’ s b e h a v i o r a n d f a c t o r s i n c r e a s i n g t h e
p r o b a b i l i t i e s o f p e o p l e t u r n i n g i n t o v i c t i m s o r
per pet r at or s of v iolent act s.
- Th e f i r st l ev el i d en t i f i es b i o l o g i cal an d p er so n al
h ist or y f act or s. Traceable dat a in clu de per son al an d
d em o g r ap h i c ch ar act er i st i cs ( ag e, sex , ed u cat i o n ,
incom e) , ant ecedent s of aggr essive or self- devaluat ion
b e h a v i o r s , m e n t a l o r p e r s o n a l i t y d i s o r d e r s a n d
su b st an ce- r elat ed d isor d er s.
- The second lev el includes closer r elat ions, such as
t h ose b et w een cou p les an d p ar t n er s, ot h er f am ily
m em ber s and fr iends. I t has been obser ved t hat t hese
incr ease t he r isk of suffer ing or per pet r at ing v iolent
act s. Having friends w ho com m it or incit e violent act s
can increase t he risk t hat young people w ill suffer or
ex ecu t e t h ese act ion s.
- The t hird level explores t he com m unit y cont ext s where
social relat ions are developed in, such as schools, work
p l aces an d n ei g h b o r h o o d s. At t em p t s ar e m ad e t o
ident ify t he char act er ist ics of t hese env ir onm ent s, as
t hey can increase t he risk of violent act s. The risk can
be influenced by fact or s lik e m obilit y of t he place of
r esid en ce, p op u lat ion d en sit y, h ig h u n em p loy m en t
s o c i a l c o n s e q u e n c e s t h a t s o m e t i m e s m a k e i t
im possible for her t o leav e t his v iolent hom e w her e
h e r i n d i v i d u a l g u a r a n t e e s a r e v i o l a t e d a n d h e r
indiv idualit y is denigr at ed.
As t h is ph en om en on af f ect s people’s h ealt h
and h as r eper cu ssion s for pu blic h ealt h at all lev els
( r eg ion al, n at ion al an d in t er n at ion al) , in t er n at ion al
con f er en ces ar e h eld t o look f or d et er m in an t s an d
f act or s t h at lead t o a b et t er u n d er st an d in g of t h e
v iolen ce p h en om en on , w h ich h it s m an y w om en on
t his planet .
Th e Wor ld Healt h Or gan izat ion r ecom m en ds
t h e Ecological Model t o u n der st an d v iolen ce, h opin g
t o cl ar i f y t h e r el at i o n b et w een l ear n ed b eh av i o r s,
m an’s violent behavior and w om an’s passive behavior.
I t is im por t ant t o analy ze fact or s influencing
p eop le’s b eh av ior t ow ar d s v iolen ce w it h a v iew t o
est ablish in g h elp pr ogr am s.
REFERENCES
1 . Min ay o SMC, Sou za RE, or gan izador as. Violên cia
sob o olh ar da saú de. Rio de Jan eir o ( RJ) : Fiocr u z;
2 0 0 3 .
2 . Or g an ización Pan am er ican a d e la Salu d , Of icin a
Region al par a las Am ér icas. I n f or m e m u n dial sobr e
la v iolencia y la salud. Washingt on: OMS; 2002.
3. Schr aiber LB, D´ Oliveir a AFPL. O que devem saber
os pr ofission ais de saú de par a pr om ov er os dir eit os
e a saú d e d as m u l h er es em si t u ação d e v i ol ên ci a
d o m é s t i c a . Pr o j e t o Gê n e r o , v i o l ê n c i a e D i r e i t o s
Hum anos - Novas Quest ões par a o Cam po da Saúde.
2ª ed. São Paulo: Fundação For d, CREMESP; 2003.
4. Alber di I . Mat as N. La violencia dom ést ica: infor m e
s o b r e l o s m a l o s t r a t o s a m u j e r e s e n Es p a ñ a .
Bar celona ( ES) : Fundación “ La Caix a” ; 2 0 0 2 .
5. I nm uj er es 2003: Ley del inst it ut o nacional de las
m uj er es: poder ej ecut iv o: secr et ar ia de gober nación.
[ página da int er net ] . Mexico: I nst it ut o nacional de las
m uj er es; [ acesso em : 26 m aio.2004] . Disponivel em :
h t t p : / / c e d o c . i n m u j e r e s . g o b . m x /
d ocu m en t os_ d ow n load / 1 0 0 1 9 9 . p d f.
6. Fonseca RMGS. Espaço e gêner o na com pr eensão
do pr ocesso saúde- doença da m ulher br asileir a. Rev
Lat ino- am Enfer m agem 1 9 9 7 ; 5 ( 1 ) : 5 - 1 3 .
7. Gar cía- Moreno C. Violencia cont r a la m uj er: Género
y equidad en la salud. Washingt on ( DC) : Or ganización
Pa n a m e r i ca n a d e l a Sa l u d - H a r v a r d Ce n t e r f o r
Po p u l a t i o n s a n d D e v e l o p m e n t S t u d i e s ; 2 0 0 0 .
Pu blicación Especial.
8. Ram ír ez DE. Fact or es psicosociales de la v iolencia
f am iliar. Rev En f er m er as, Méx ico 2 0 0 1 ; 3 7 ( 1 2 ) : 8
-1 5 .
9. Rohlfs I , Valls- Llobet C. Act uar cont ra la v iolencia
de géner o: un r et o par a la salud pública. Gac Sanit
2003; 17( 4) : 263- 5.
10. Gar cía- Mor eno C, Heise LL. Violência per pet r ada
por par ceir os ínt im os. I n: Wor ld Healt h Or ganizat ion.
Wor ld Repor t on violence and Healt h. Genebra: OMS;
2002; p. 91- 121.
1 1 . He i se L, El l sb e r g M, Go t t e m o e l l e r M. En d i n g
v i o l e n ce Ag a i n st Wo m e n . Po p u l a t i o n s Re p 1 9 9 9 ;
2 7 ( 4 ) : 1 - 4 3 .
12. Alvar ado R, Gut iér r ez C. Violencia conyugal según
niveles socioeconóm icos en Región Met ropolit ana. Rev
Chil Salud Pública 2002; 6( 1) : 27- 35.
1 3 . Ca s i q u e , LC. V i o l ê n c i a p e r p e t r a d a p o r
com pan h eir os ín t im os às m u lh er es em Celay a. Tese
[ D o u t o r a d o ] . Ri b e i r ã o Pr e t o ( S P) : Es c o l a d e
Enfer m agem de Ribeir ão Pr et o ( SP) : USP; 2004.
14. Pér ez RR, Casique LC. Tipos de violencia que sufr e
l a m u j e r. Gu a n a j u a t o ( M X ) : U n i v e r s i d a d d e
Guanaj uat o, Facult ad de Enfer m er ía y Obst et r icia de
Celay a; 2 0 0 1 .
15. Aliaga PP, Ahum ada GS; Marfull JM. Violencia hacia
la m u j er : u n pr oblem a de t odos. Rev. Ch il. Obst et .
Ginecol. 2003; 68( 1) : 75- 8.
1 6 . Wy n t er AE. La v iolen cia d esd e u n a p er sp ect iv a
de Géner o. Rev Enfer m er as 2 0 0 1 ; 3 7 ( 1 - 2 ) : 2 3 - 6 .
17. Alt am irano RI . La violencia int rafam iliar: Los m it os.
Rev Méd de Guanaj uat o 2000; 10( 1- 2) : 206- 9.
1 8 . Gianini RJ, Lit v oc J, Eluf- Net o J. Agr essão física
por classe social. Rev Saúde Pública 1999; 33( 2) :
180-6 .
19. Heise L. Violence against w om en: an int egr at ed,
ecological f r am ew or k . Pop Repor t s 1 9 9 8 ; 4 ( 3 ) : 2 6 2
-9 0 .