• Nenhum resultado encontrado

J. Coloproctol. (Rio J.) vol.37 número4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "J. Coloproctol. (Rio J.) vol.37 número4"

Copied!
4
0
0

Texto

(1)

jcoloproctol(rioj).2017;37(4):328–331

w w w . j c o l . o r g . b r

Journal

of

Coloproctology

Technical

Note

Double

single-port

transanal

pouch

surgery:

a

novel

technique

for

rectal

excision

and

ileo-anal

pouch

anastomosis

for

ulcerative

colitis

Janindra

Warusavitarne

a

,

Paulo

Gustavo

Kotze

b,∗

aSt.Mark’sHospital,DepartmentofColorectalSurgery,London,UnitedKingdom

bPontifíciaUniversidadeCatólicadoParaná(PUCPR),HospitalUniversitárioCajuru,UnidadedeCirurgiaColorretal,Curitiba,PR,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received15July2017 Accepted20July2017

Availableonline6September2017

Keywords:

Colitisulcerative Rectum

Minimallyinvasivesurgical procedures

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Surgeryforileoanalpouchhasevolveddramaticallyoverthelast30years.Manyofthe advancesrelatetominimallyinvasiveapproachesthatnotonlyoffercosmeticbenefitsbut alsohaveadvantagesthatarewelldescribedintheliterature.Inthistechnicalnote,the authorsdescribethedoublesingle-porttransanalpouchoperation.Anabdominal single-portisusedfortotalcolectomy,atthesiteoftheileostomy.Atransanalsingle-portisused forthe‘bottom-up’rectalresection.Thetechnicalstepsandpotentialadvantagesofthe techniquearediscussedindetail.Doublesingle-porttransanalpouchsurgeryistechnically feasibleandcanhavesignificantbenefitsinulcerativecolitispatients.

©2017SociedadeBrasileiradeColoproctologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditoraLtda.This isanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Cirurgia

de

reservatório

ileal

com

duplo

single-port:

uma

nova

técnica

para

a

ressecc¸ão

retal

e

anastomose

ileo-anal

na

retocolite

ulcerativa

Palavras-chave:

Coliteulcerativa Reto

Procedimentoscirúrgicos minimamenteinvasivos

r

e

s

u

m

o

Acirurgiaparabolsaileoanalevoluiuexcepcionalmentenosúltimos30anos.Muitosdos avanc¸osreferem-seaabordagensminimamenteinvasivas,quenãosóoferecem benefí-ciosestéticos,mastambémsignificamvantagensjádevidamentedescritasnaliteratura. Nestanotatécnica,osautoresdescrevemaoperac¸ãodereservatórioilealtransanalcom duploacessoporsingle-port.Umportalúnicoabdominaléutilizadoparaacolectomiatotal, nolocaldaileostomia.Umsegundoportalúnicotransanaléusadoparaaressecc¸ãorectal

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:[email protected](P.G.Kotze).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcol.2017.07.005

(2)

jcoloproctol(rioj).2017;37(4):328–331

329

“debaixoparacima”.Asetapastécnicasepotenciaisvantagensdatécnicasãodiscutidas emdetalhes.Acirurgiadereservatórioilealtransanalcomduploacessoporportaúnicaé tecnicamenteviávelepoderepresentarbenefíciossignificativosempacientescomcolite ulcerativa.

©2017SociedadeBrasileiradeColoproctologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditoraLtda.Este ´eumartigoOpenAccesssobumalicenc¸aCCBY-NC-ND(http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Introduction

Surgeryforileoanalpouchhasevolvedconsiderablyoverthe years.Minimally invasivetechniques have been the main-stayof recentdevelopments and low stapledanastomoses have been possible with the advent of advanced stapling devises.1,2 Thelatestadvanceinminimallyinvasivesurgery

isthetransanalrectalresection,andthistechniquehasbeen welldescribedinpouchsurgery.3

There are several potential advantagestothe transanal approach.Theadvantagesareprobablybestconferredinthe narrow male pelvis and in obese patients. This dissection laparoscopicallyisfrequently difficultand mayoften leads toconversion.Inaddition,thetechniqueavoidsmultiple sta-plerfiringsacrossthedistalrectumwhichcanincreasethe riskofanastomoticleak.4 Subsequentreinforcementofthe

anastomosisthroughtheanushasthetheoreticaladvantage offurtherreducingtheleakrate.

Currently,onlytechnicaldescriptionsandsmallcaseseries discussthefeasibilityandoutcomesofthetransanalpouch procedure.3,5,6 There are also different anal platforms that

canbeused:TEM(TransanalEndoscopicMicrosurgery,Richard Wolff,Germany),TEO(TransanalEndoscopicOperation,Karl Storz,Tuttlingen,Germany)ordetachablesingleportdevices. TEMandTEOarefixedplatformsthatcanmaketheprocedure challenginginsomecases.Detachabledevicesdonothave fix-ation,andallowthesurgeontohavebettertriangulationand comforttoperformtheprocedure.

The aim of this technical note is to describe in detail thesurgicalstepsofthedoublesingle-porttransanalpouch surgery,andtodiscusspossibleadvantagesofthetechnique.

Surgical

technique

Inthedoublesingle-portprocedure,aGelPointPort(Applied Medical,RanchoSantoMargarita,California)isplacedatthe ileostomysite, and a GelPoint Path (Applied Medical, Ran-cho Santo Margarita, California) is used for the transanal procedure.Inordertoestablishapneumoperitoneum,a sin-gleincision isperformedatthestomasite,generallyinthe right iliac fossa. If the patient had a previous colectomy withmucousfistula,thefistulawiththerectalstumpcanbe mobilisedandreleasedintotheabdominalcavity,afterwhich theGelPointisinserted.Thishasaring tosecureit tothe abdominalwallandalidthroughwhichportsareinserted.

TheGelPointdevicehasthreeworkingportsandastandard 10mm30◦ laparoscopiccamera(KarlStorz,Tuttlingen,

Ger-many)isused,whichcanbeinsertedintoanyoftheports.

Anadditional5mmportcanbeplacedintheleftiliacfossato allowbettertriangulationandretraction,ifnecessary.Thissite isusuallyusedtoplacethepelvicdrainattheendofthe proce-dure.Pneumoperitoneumisusuallymaintainedatapressure of12mmHg.

TherectaldissectioncanbecommencedintheTME(total mesorectalexcision)planeorthecloserectalapproachfrom theabdominalport.Thesuperiorrectalarteryisthendivided. Therectalphaseoftheoperationiscommencedconcurrently andapursestringsutureisplacedapproximately3–4cm prox-imaltothedentatelinewiththeaidofaLonestarretractor (CooperSurgical,Trumbull,USA).Theamountofrectalmucosa thatisleftbehindaftertheinitialdistalrectaldivisionisbased onthedegreeofproctitisandthepresenceorabsenceof dys-plasia. When dysplasiaisnot theindicationforsurgery or whenthedistalproctitisisnotsevere,a1–2cmrectalcuffis lefttoreducetheriskofstoolleakage.

TheGelPointPathtransanaldeviceisplacedintheanal canal(Fig.1).Two standardportsare placedwithinthe gel followedbya12mmAirsealport(ConmedUSA).Airseal insuf-flationiscommencedat5mmHguntilthedeviceisactiveand thenincreasedto20mmHg.Thedissectionisstartedlaterally usingadiathermyhook.Weprefertouseahookratherthana harmonicscalpel,asithelpstoreducesmokeandfacilitates endoscopicviewing(Fig.2).Thecloserectaldissectionis con-tinuedsuchthattheabdominalandrectaloperatorsapproach themidrectumfromoppositedirections.Incaseswith associ-ateddysplasia,theTMEplanemustberespectedandfollowed. Duringthispartoftheprocedure,thetwooperatorscanassist eachothertoensuresafetyandadequateretraction(Fig.3). Simultaneousdissectionalsoreducestheoperationtimeand canmaketheoperationeasier.Oncetheproctectomyis com-pletedthespecimenisbroughtoutthroughthestomasite,or

(3)

330

jcoloproctol(rioj).2017;37(4):328–331

Fig.2–Commencingthedissection.

Fig.3–Retractionanddissection,withcommunication withtheabdominalteam(sponge).

Fig.4–Transanalextractionofthespecimen.

transanally(Fig.4).TheJ-pouchisthencreated,bystandard stapling,afterbringingtheileumoutthroughthestomasite, andtheanvilofthestaplingdeviceissuturedandconnectedto anextender,usuallyanumber18Foleycatheter(Fig.5).Afull thicknesspursestringsutureisthenplacedintheremaining rectalcuff.Werecommendastrong suturewith0prolene, thatallowsstrongtractionwithouttissuerupture.Thisisalso examinedtoensurethatthevaginaisnotincorporatedinthe females.Theanvilwithitsextender, asshowninFig.5, is placedinthepouchandtheproximalpursestringissecured. Thepouchisthenreturnedtotheperitonealcavity.The patientispositionedintherightsideuppositiontoensurethat

Fig.5–Pouchcreationatstomasite,extensorandanvil.

Fig.6–Staplinganastomosis.

(4)

tro-jcoloproctol(rioj).2017;37(4):328–331

331

carsite,andusuallyaloopileostomyismaturedinthesingle portsiteattherightlowerquadrant.

Comments

and

final

messages

Minimallyinvasivesurgeryforinflammatoryboweldiseases shouldbethe mainstay,notonlyforthe cosmetic benefits forthepredominantly youngpopulationbut alsoformany otherclinicalreasons.Minimallyinvasiveproceduresare rec-ommendedfortotalcolectomywithorwithout completion proctectomyintheEuropeanCrohn’sand Colitis Organisa-tion(ECCO)guidelines,owingtoreducedhospitalstay,faster returntonormalactivitiesandenhancedrecoverypathways.7

Single-portapproaches canalsobetechnically feasibleand performedinthisgroupofpatientsandtheadvantagessuch asreducedconversionratesandreducedpainrelief require-mentshaverecentlybeendescribed.

Therecanbetechnicaldifferencesbetweenthetransanal approachtorectalexcision betweenpatientswithlow rec-talcancerandulcerativecolitiswithoutdysplasia.Inpatients withcancer,thetransanaltotalmesorectalexcision(TaTME) istheapproachofchoice,withfullexcisionofthe mesorec-tumbasedonsoundoncologicprinciples.8Thistechniqueis

beingadoptedworldwideasanalternativetotheabdominal dissectionoftherectum,thatcanbesometimeschallenging andtimeconsuming.Inthemanagementofulcerative coli-tis,acloserectaldissectioncanbeperformed,ifthereareno signsofcancerordysplasiaintherectum.9,10Thisisdueto

thepossibilityofhavingsmallerpre-sacralsinusesincases ofileoanal anastomoticdehiscence.Oneprospectivestudy demonstratedthatthecloserectaldissectionwasassociated withlowercomplicationratesascomparedtoTME.9Onthis

basis,forbenigndiseaseswhererectalresectionisrequired closerectaldissectioncanberecommended.7

Acaseseriesincluding16patientswiththedouble single-portapproachforulcerativecolitiswasrecentlypublished.5

Theearlysurgicalcomplicationrate(upto30daysafterthe procedure),wasacceptableandcomparablewithother min-imallyinvasiveapproaches.BasedontheClavienandDindo classificationofcomplications,fourpatientshadgrade1,one patienthadgrade2andonepatienthadgrade3 complica-tion.Fivepatientshadminorcomplications(31.25%)andone patienthad ananastomoticleakage2weeksafterthe pro-cedure,and was considered tohavea majorcomplication. AllthecasesfromthisserieswereoperatedwiththeTaTME approach,andcloserectaldissectionwasnotperformed.

Insummary,doublesingleporttransanalpouchsurgeryis technicallyfeasibleandisaninterestingalternativeapproach for the surgical management of ulcerative colitis. This approachoffers the opportunityto performa pure laparo-scopicoperationinallpatientswhichhasthepotentialbenefit ofbetteroutcomesforpatientswhererectaldissectioncan bedifficultfromtheabdomen.Ifthisisextrapolatedbeyond theimmediatebenefitsoflaparoscopy,thetechniquehasthe potentialtoreducethe hybridprocedures wheretherectal

dissectionisperformedviaanabdominalincision.Thishas thepotentialtoimprovefertilityratesafterpouchsurgeryas thereducedfertilityratesaremostlydirectlyrelatedtopelvic adhesionsfromopensurgery.Moreprospectivestudies com-paringtheTaTMEapproachwiththecloserectaldissection can clarifythe best alternative forpatients withulcerative colitis.Combiningthetransanalapproachwithanabdominal single-portresultsinbettercosmesisandlesssurgicaltrauma, withfasterrecovery.Moreprospectivestudiesarewarranted inordertofirmlydemonstratethebenefitsofthisprocedure andplaceitasaprocedureofchoiceforIPAA.

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

1.BachSP,MortensenNJ.Revolutionandevolution:30yearsof ileoanalpouchsurgery.InflammBowelDis.2006;12:131–45.

2.BaekSJ,DozoisEJ,MathisKL,LightnerAL,BoostromSY,Cima RR,etal.Safety,feasibility,andshort-termoutcomesin588 patientsundergoingminimallyinvasiveilealpouch-anal anastomosis:asingle-institutionexperience.Tech Coloproctol.2016;20:369–74.

3.deBuckvanOverstraetenA,WolthuisAM,D’HooreA. Transanalcompletionproctectomyaftertotalcolectomyand ilealpouch-analanastomosisforulcerativecolitis:amodified singlestapledtechnique.ColorectalDis.2016;18:O141–4.

4.RoumenRM,RahusenFT,WijnenMH,CroisetvanUchelen FA.“Dogear”formationafterdouble-stapledlowanterior resectionasariskfactorforanastomoticdisruption.Dis ColonRectum.2000;43:522–5.

5.LeoCA,SamaranayakeS,Perry-WoodfordZL,VitoneL,FaizO, HodgkinsonJD,etal.Initialexperienceofrestorative proctocolectomyforulcerativecolitisbytransanaltotal mesorectalrectalexcisionandsingle-incisionabdominal laparoscopicsurgery.ColorectalDis.2016;18:1162–6.

6.CoffeyJC,DillonMF,O’DriscollJS,FaulE.Transanaltotal mesocolicexcision(taTME)aspartofileoanalpouch formationinulcerativecolitis–firstreportofacase.IntJ ColorectalDis.2016;31:735–6.

7.ØreslandT,BemelmanWA,SampietroGM,SpinelliA, WindsorA,FerranteM,etal.EuropeanCrohn’sandColitis Organisation(ECCO).Europeanevidencebasedconsensuson surgeryforulcerativecolitis.JCrohnsColitis.2015;9:4–25.

8.WolthuisAM,BislenghiG,deBuckvanOverstraetenA, D’HooreA.Transanaltotalmesorectalexcision:towards standardizationoftechnique.WorldJGastroenterol. 2015;21:12686–95.

9.BartelsSA,GardenbroekTJ,AartsM,PonsioenCY,TanisPJ, BuskensCJ,etal.Short-termmorbidityandqualityoflife fromarandomizedclinicaltrialofcloserectaldissectionand totalmesorectalexcisioninilealpouch-analanastomosis.Br JSurg.2015;102:281–7.

Imagem

Fig. 1 – Port and trocars.
Fig. 2 – Commencing the dissection.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

Qualidade de vida em pacientes portadores de doenc¸a inflamatória intestinal: traduc¸ão para o português e validac¸ão do questionário “Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Another descriptive, retrospective study, that compared the profile of 52 octogenarian patients (Group I) with 386 patients younger than 80 years (Group II), from 2007 to 2011, found

Concurrently with data collection, comparative Excel charts were created embracing patient’s name and other demo- graphic characteristics, such as age at surgery, gender,

Conclusion: There is an association between the occurrence of appendicitis and the months of the year; however, this is a weak negative correlation between the monthly mean of cases

Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate the capacity of ischemic postconditioning and atorvastatin in prevent or minimize reperfusion injury in small bowel of rats subjected

incomplete examination, the administered dose of fentanyl and midazolam, and the degree of abdominal pain informed (0: no pain, 1–2: mild pain [well tolerated], 3–7: moderate

Note the atrophy of crypts and the reduction of the neutral mucin content in goblet cells; (B) tissue expression of neutral mucins in the colonic mucosa devoid of fecal stream in

They discussed a strong association in patient with chronic diseases like ulcerative colitis or primary sclerosing cholangitis making it a high risk group for ileostomy neoplasms..