• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Braz. J. Phys. vol.30 número4

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Braz. J. Phys. vol.30 número4"

Copied!
2
0
0

Texto

(1)

Two-Dimensional Ising Model and Loal

Nonuniversality of Critial Exponents

R. Z.Bariev 1;2

1

Departamento deFsia,Universidade FederaldeS~aoCarlos,13565-905, S~aoCarlos,SPBrazil

2

TheKazanPhysio-TehnialInstituteof theRussianAademy ofSienes,Kazan420029, Russia

Reeivedon15August,2000

WeobtaintheloalmagnetizationofaplanarIsingmodelwithdefetsofdierenttypes. Itisshown

thatneartheritialpointtheloalmagnetizationhasanonuniversalbehaviorthatmanifestsitself

inthefatthat itsritial exponentis aontinuousfuntionofthemirosopiparametersofthe

system.

TheIsingmodelisthesimplestmodelofmagnetism

andwasproposedbyIsing[1℄in 1925. Themost

inter-estingpropertyofthismodelwasdisoveredbyOnsager

[2℄forthetwo-dimensionalmodelin 1944. Thismodel

hasaphasetransition and wasthe basisforthe

mod-ern theory of phase transitions. The 8-vertex model

wassolvedbyBaxter[3℄andhasanonuniversal

behav-iorthatmanifestsitselfinthefatthatitsritialindex

is aontinuous funtion ofthe mirosopi

parame-tersofthesystem. Inthisreportwepresentarigorous

andphenomenologialanalysis ofdierenttypesof

lo-al magnetization ofthe two-dimensional Ising model.

Firstlyweonsiderlineardefetsoftwodierenttypes

[4℄. The loal magnetization is alulated exatly for

this model, anda study ismade of its dependene on

the distane to the defet and on the size of the

de-fet. Themostinterestingfeatureofthesolutionisthe

dependeneoftheritialexponentoftheloal

magne-tizationontheinterationparameter.

Theinterationenergyofthelattiesonsideredan

berepresentedasasumoftwoterms

E=E

0

+E; (1)

whereE

0

istheenergyof thedefet-free lattie,

E

0 =

M

X

m=1 M N

X

n=1 N (J

1 s

mn s

m;n+1 +J

2 s

mn s

m+1;n ); (2)

and E is the energy of the perturbation due to the

preseneofthedefets. Forthelattieofthersttype,

E = (J 0

1 J

1 )

M

X

m=1 M s

mo s

M1

; (3)

andforthelattieoftheseondtype,

E = (J 0

2 J

2 )

M

X

s

mo s

N1

: (4)

Intheseexpressionss

mn

isthespinvariableonneted

with a lattie site having oordinates m and n , and

takesvalues1;J

1 ;J

0

1 andJ

2 ;J

0

2

aretheenergiesofthe

interationbetweenthehorizontalandvertialpairsof

neighboring spins, respetively. Here both diretions

M;N !1.

Wedenethe loalmagnetization ofalattiewith

defetsinanalogywiththedenitionofthe

magnetiza-tionofthespin-spinorrelationfuntion

<s

n

>= lim

L!1 <s

mn s

m;n+L

>=<s

m;n+L

>: (5)

We haveommitted from theleft-hand side of this

ex-pressiontherowindex beauseofthetranslational

in-varianeofthelattiein questionin thevertial

dire-tion.

Forspinswithlargeolumnnumbertheloal

mag-netization does not dier from the magnetization <

s>

0

ofadefet-freelattie

<s

0

> = [1 (sinh2K

1

sinh2K

2 )

2

℄ 1=8

;

= j1 T=T

j; (6)

K

i =J

i

=kT;wherekisBoltzmann'sonstant,Tisthe

temperature,andthesubsriptmarksthevalueofthe

funtion at theritialpointT

. Wehaveobtainedan

exatsolutionfortheloalmagnetizationandonsider

its behaviorin the most interesting- saling - region,

dened bythefollowingrelations:

1

!0;n!1; (7)

where istheorrelationradius ofthedefet-free

lat-tie

1

(2)

Ananalysisoftheexatexpressionshowsthattheloal

magnetization inthisregionhasthesalingform

<s

n

>=<s>

0

f(x;) (9)

Forthelattiewithdefetsofthersttype

x = (2n 1) 1

S 1=2

1 ;

= (C

1 C

0

1 )(C

1 C

0

1 )

1

; C 1

1

<1;

x = 2(n 1) 1

S 1=2

1 ;

= tanh2(K

2 K

0

2

); 1<<1;

C

i

= osh2K

i ;S

i

=sinh2K

i

: (10)

Themost interestingfeature ofthis solutionis the

nonuniversalbehavioroftheloalmagnetizationat

dis-tanesnsmallerthanhalftheorrelationradiusofthe

defet-free model. This nonuniversalityonsistsin the

fatthattheritialexponent

lo

ofthemagnetization

isaontinuousfuntionoftheinterationparameters

<s

n >

lo

forn; (11)

where

lo

=[aros( )℄ 2

: (12)

Thus,theloalmagnetizationofalattiewithalineof

defets,atdistaneslargerthan tothedefet,hardly

diers from themagnetization of adefet-free lattie.

The deviation beomes so substantialthat it leadsto

a hange of the ritial exponent

lo

that

harater-izes thedependene of theloal magnetization on the

relativetemperature.

We now disuss the reasonfor the nonuniversality

oftheritialbehavioroftheloalmagnetizationfrom

the point of viewof the generaltheory of phase

tran-sitions [5℄. Let us investigate ad-dimensional system

near aritialpointdeterminedbytheHamiltonian

H =H

0 +H

1 =

Z

(r)dr+ Z

!(r)dr (13)

withasmallparameter. Theenergydensity(r)and

perturbationdensity!(r)are loal quantities that

de-pend on the mirosopi variables whih desribe the

system.

Weinvestigatead-dimensionalsystemnear a

rit-ial pointdetermined bytheHamiltonian (1). We

as-sumethattheperturbationisausedbythepreseneof

ahomogeneousdefetofdimensionalityd

. Inthisase

the perturbationitself hasdimensionality d 0

(d

<d 0

).

Dene thefuntion (r) inthefollowingway

(r) = z(r);

z(r) = [(x

d

+1 )

2

+(x

d

+2 )

2

+:::+(x

d 0)

2

℄ =2

;

wherex

1 ;:::;x

d

are theaxesofaCartesianoordinate

system. The oordinate axes x

1 ;:::;x

d

are hosen in

suh a way that axes x

1 ;:::;x

d

0 span the subspae of

theperturbationinwhihthedefetsubspaewithaxes

x

1 ;:::;x

d

is embedded. The integration in the rst

term of (13) is arried out in a d-dimensional spae,

while theseond term involvesa d' -dimensional

sub-spaeintegration.

Theresultsofouranalysisare thefollowing[6℄. In

thease

d

eff =

! ;

where

d

eff

=max(d 0

;d); (15)

weanalulatethehangeintheritialexponentsto

linearorderin ,

' =

0

' +a

1 S

d 0

d ()

0

;

! =

0

! +b

1 S

d 0

d

(): (16)

Thus in this aseloal ritial exponents are

ontinu-ousfuntionsofthemirosopipertubationparameter

j

. Thisindiates thatthere isaloal violationofthe

universalityhypothesis.

Suhasituationanourinthegeneralase,and

notonlyfortheaseofaspeial symmetry-a

hara-teristiof aspeial symmetry -aharateristiof the

defetmodels investigated earlierwhose

dimensionali-tieswereintegers.

Reent developments in this eld of investigation

anbefoundin Refs. [6-8℄.

This work wassupported in part byConselho

Na-ional de Desenvolvimento Ciento e Tenologio

-CNPq-Brazil,andbyFunda~aodeAmparoaPesquisa

doEstadodeS~aoPaulo-FAPESP-Brazil.

Referenes

[1℄ E.Ising,Zeit.Phys.31,253(1925).

[2℄ L.Onsager,Phys.Rev.65,117(1944).

[3℄ R.Baxter,Phys.Rev.Lett.26,832(19710.

[4℄ R.Z.Bariev,JETP77,1217(1979).

[5℄ R.Z.Bariev,JETP94,374(1988).

[6℄ B.N.Shalaev,Phys.Rept.237,129(1994).

[7℄ F. Igloi, I. Peshel and L. Turban Adv. Phys. 42,

683(1993)

Referências

Documentos relacionados

body transverse Ising model with random bonds and elds. The ouplings and the magneti elds are

transition in suh a model, and study the orresponding ritial temperature as the spin value ande. the

the master equation on the phase spae, and the evolution of loal and global spin autoorrelation.. funtions, in terms of independent relaxation modes, whih are eigenvetors of the

We propose an improvement of a Monte Carlo method designed to treat the Ising model in a

universality lass at the ritial point marking

We alulate the spatial and temperature dependenes of various spin orre-.. lation funtions, as well as the wave-vetor dependene of the spin suseptibility for

relations has been applied to obtain the time evolution of a non-ommuting spin

The kineti Ising model on an n-isotopi hain is onsidered in the framework of Glauber dynamis.. The hain is omposed of N segments with n sites, eah one oupied by a