• Nenhum resultado encontrado

Rev. bras. ortop. vol.51 número1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Share "Rev. bras. ortop. vol.51 número1"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto

(1)

w w w . r b o . o r g . b r

Case

Report

Intraosseous

lipoma

of

the

iliac:

case

report

Frederico

Barra

de

Moraes

,

Rodrigo

Marques

Paranahyba,

Rogério

Andrade

do

Amaral,

Vinícius

Mendes

Bonfim,

Nathalya

Ducarmo

Jordão,

Raimundo

Djalma

Souza

SchoolofMedicine,UniversidadeFederaldeGoiás,Goiânia,GO,Brazil

a

r

t

i

c

l

e

i

n

f

o

Articlehistory:

Received24October2014

Accepted19February2015

Availableonline2January2016

Keywords:

Boneneoplasms/etiology

Boneneoplasms/diagnosis

Lipoma

a

b

s

t

r

a

c

t

Lipomasarebenigntumorsthatattackfatcellsandmostoftenaffectingsofttissuesin

adult-hood.Onrareoccasions,theymayaffectbones,preferentiallythemetaphysesofthelong

bone.Theyaregenerallyasymptomaticandradiographyshowsradiolucentlesionswitha

thinscleroticrimorradiodenselesionswithathickscleroticrim.Malignanttransformation

ofthesetumorsisrare,asistheirrecurrence,andthereisnoneedforsurgeryinmostcases.

Inthisreport,wepresentararecaseofintraosseouslipomaintheiliacbone.

©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublishedbyElsevierEditora

Ltda.Allrightsreserved.

Lipoma

intraósseo

do

ilíaco:

relato

de

caso

Palavras-chave:

Neoplasiasósseas/etiologia

Neoplasiasósseas/diagnóstico

Lipoma

r

e

s

u

m

o

Oslipomassãotumoresbenignosqueacometemcélulasadiposas,maiscomumenteafetam

ostecidos molesnaidadeadulta.Raramentepodemafetarosossos,preferencialmente

metáfisesdosossoslongos.Sãogeralmenteassintomáticos,naradiografiaverifica-selesão

radiotransparente,comumafinabordaescleróticaoulesãoradiodensacomumaespessa

bordaesclerótica.Atransformac¸ãomalignadotumorérara,assimcomoarecorrência,sem

necessidadecirúrgicanamaioriadoscasos.Nesterelatoapresentamosumcasorarode

lipomaintraósseodoilíaco.

©2015SociedadeBrasileiradeOrtopediaeTraumatologia.PublicadoporElsevierEditora

Ltda.Todososdireitosreservados.

WorkperformedintheUniversidadeFederaldeGoiás,SchoolofMedicine,HospitaldasClínicas,DepartmentofOrthopedicsand

Traumatology,Goiânia,GO,Brazil.

Correspondingauthor.

E-mail:[email protected](F.B.deMoraes).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rboe.2015.12.011

(2)

thattheydonotpreferentiallyaffecteithersex.Theagegroup

affected isverywide, and casescanbe foundbothamong

childrenandamongelderlypeople.Theyaremostcommonly

diagnosedinthefourthdecadeoflife.Theiretiologyremains

unknownandisamatterofcontroversy.2

Intraosseous lipomas may affect any part of the

skele-tonandaremostfrequentlylocatedinthetranstrochanteric

regionoftheproximalfemur(34%),tibia(13%),fibula(10%),

calcaneus(8%), iliac bone(8%) andhumerus and ribs(5%).

Theypreferentiallyaffectthemetaphysesoflongbonesand

presentassinglelesions.However,reportsofmultipletumors

scatteredaroundtheentireskeletonhavebeenmade.3

Lipomaspresentfew symptoms.Pain isthe commonest

ofthese,andthe absenceofspecificsymptomsmay cause

difficultyinmakingthediagnosis.Thereisaneedfortheaid

ofimagingexaminations.However,oncethelipomahasbeen

found,theprognosisisgenerallygoodandafullcurecanbe

achieved.4Theobjectiveofthisstudywastoreportonarare

caseofintraosseouslipomaoftheiliac.

Case

report

Thepatientwasa45-year-oldmanwhoreportedhaving

insid-iouspaininhisrighthipthathadstartedthreemonthsearlier.

Itwasunrelatedtotraumaanddidnothaveanyspecific

char-acteristics.Thepainscoreonavisualanaloguescale(VAS)

was5/10,anditimprovedthroughuseofnon-steroidal

anti-inflammatorydrugsandworsenedwithslighteffort.

Physicalexaminationdidnotshowanylimitationof

move-mentsofthepelvis,lumbarspineorrighthip.Radiography

wasthenperformedonthepelvisinanteroposteriorview.A

circumferentialosteolyticlesioninthewingoftherightiliac,

ofapproximately3cmindiameter,withwell-definededges,

wasobserved(Fig.1A).Becauseofthenonspecificnatureofthe

imageobtainedthroughradiography,tomographywith

three-dimensionalreconstructionwasrequested.Alesionaffecting

theposteriorcorticalboneofthewingoftherightiliaccould

beseen(Fig.1B).

Acoronalslice forabonewindow(Fig.2A)andanaxial

sliceforasoft-tissuewindow(Fig.2B)showedthatthelesion

extendedthroughthemedullarytissue,fromthe

anterome-dialtotheposterolateralregionoftherightiliacbone.Inthis

region,therewasfracturingofthecorticalbone,ofosteolytic

andinsufflativenature.

Bonescintigraphywithtechnetiumwasperformedanddid

notshowthelesion(Fig.3AandB),whichsuggestedthatthe

lesionwasofbenignnature.Tocomplementtheevaluation,

magneticresonancewasperformedonthepelvis.Inthis,T1

coronalimaging showeda lesion withhyposignal, without

invasionofsoft tissues(Fig.4A).T2coronalimagingofthe

pelvis(Fig.4B)showedalesionwithhypersignalintheright

iliac.

nityinthematerial.Thesuspicionofbenigntumorformation

wasthusconfirmedanditwasdiagnosedasanintraosseous

lipoma.Aroundthreemonthsaftertheprocedure,thepatient

nolongerpresentedpainandtherewasnorecurrenceofthe

lesion.

Discussion

Intraosseouslipomaisarare benigntypeofbonetumor.It

mainlyaffectsthemetaphysisoflong bonesandis

asymp-tomatic inapproximatelyhalf ofthe cases.5,6 Itaffects the

sexesalmostequally,suchthatitisslightlymoreprevalent

amongmales.6Itoccursinallagegroups,anditslightlymore

prevalentinthefourthandfifthdecadesoflife.5Involvement

oftheiliacboneisevenrarer.6,7

Dhalincalculatedtheincidenceofintraosseouslipomasas

oneinevery1000bonetumors.8However,theincidencemay

begreaterbecauseofthedifficultyindiagnosingcasesofthis

typeoflipoma.Itiscommonforsuchdiagnosestobemade

accidentallythroughimagingexaminations.5,9

Thefirstreportofintraosseouslipomaoftheiliacbonewas

madebyBuckleyandBurkus10in1988.Sincethen,duemainly

todevelopmentofdiagnostictechniques,thenumberofcases

of intraosseous lipoma reported has increased.

Nonethe-less,alocation intheiliac bonecontinuestobeextremely

rare.11

When intraosseouslipomas are symptomatic,they may

generateclinicalmanifestationssuchaspain,localswelling

and pathological fractures.5,6 Thelack ofsigns and

symp-toms differsintraosseouslipomasfrom other bonetumors

and this is a difficulty that is found in diagnosing this

type of tumor.5,7 Its etiology is a matter of controversy.9

However, there are reports in the literature of patients

withhyperlipoproteinemiaandmacrodystrophialipomatosa

whodevelopedmultipleintraosseouslipomas.12,13Sauerand

Ozonoff14demonstratedapossiblerelationshipbetween

con-genitalboneabnormalitiesandlipomas.Anotherreasonwhy

diagnosingintraosseouslipomasmaybedifficult,whichhas

beenreportedintheliterature,isthatitsradiologicalimages

maybeconfoundedwithboneinfarction,osteoblastomasand,

morerarely,enchondromas.9

AccordingtoMilgram’sclassification,intraosseouslipomas

aredividedintothreestages.StageIcomprisessolidtumors

withviableadipocytes;stageIIcomprisescasesoffocal

tran-sitioninwhichfattynecrosisandfocalcalcificationareseen,

alongwithregionswithviableadipocytes;andlastly,stageIII

consistsoflate-stagecasesinwhichthereisfattynecrosis,

cystformation,calcificationandreactiveformationofanew

bonestructure.Mostofthelesionsthathavebeendescribed

areinstageI.Thesestagechangesresultfromaprocessof

involutionandinfarctionthattheselesionsundergowiththe

passageoftime.6Lesionsattheinitialstagescause

(3)

Fig.1–Radiographofthepelvisinanteroposteriorview,showingcircumferentialosteolyticlesionsinthewingoftheright

iliac,ofapproximately3cmindiameter,withwell-definedborders(A).Tomographywiththree-dimensionalreconstruction,

inwhichalesionaffectingtheposteriorcorticalboneofthewingoftherightiliacisobserved(B).

Fig.2–Tomographicslicesincoronalviewforabonewindow(A)andinaxialviewforasoft-tissuewindow(B),showing

thatthelesionextendsthroughthemedullarytissue,fromtheanteromedialtotheposterolateralregionoftherightiliac

bone.Inthisregion,therewasfracturingofthecorticalbone,ofosteolyticandinsufflativenature.

Fig.3–Bonescintigraphywithtechnetium,whichdidnotshowthelesion(AandB),thussuggestingthatitwasofbenign

(4)

Fig.4–Magneticresonanceimagingofthepelvis,inwhichtheT1coronalimageshowedalesionwithhyposignal,without

soft-tissueinvasion(A),andinT2(B)withhypersignalintherightiliac.

Because of the different presentational stages of

intraosseous lipomas, they may appear on radiographs

bothasradiolucentlesionswithathinscleroticborderandas

radiodenselesionswithathickscleroticborder.7From

radio-graphy,thedifferentialdiagnosisalsodependsonthecurrent

stageoftheintraosseouslipoma.Themaindifferential

diag-nosesreportedintheliteratureare:bonepseudocyst, bone

infarction, fibrous dysplasia, osteoblastoma, enchondroma,

chondroblastoma, chondrosarcoma, non-ossifying fibroma

andgiant-cellbonetumor.16,17

Itisbelieved thatcomputedtomography(CT)scansand

magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most complete

examinationsforissuingadiagnosis,sincethesearecapable

ofrevealingstageIlesionsandthefatringsthatare

character-isticofstageIIandIIIlesions.7Moreover,becauseofthelarge

numberofdifferentialdiagnosesgiventhroughradiography,

asseenearlier,manyauthorshaverecommendedthatCTand

MRIshouldbeusedtoruleoutotherhypotheses.

CTisusefulindiagnosingintraosseouslipomasbecauseit

revealsanattenuationthatischaracteristicofadiposetissue.

Thetissuedensitycanbecalculatedthroughthe“Hounsfield

index”.6Adiposetissuepresentslowerdensitythanfibrous

tissueandcellularneoplasmsand,forthisreason,isespecially

radiolucent.17Insomecases,CTimagesmaybeverytypicalof

intraosseouslipomas,whichhasledmanyauthorstosuggest

thatbiopsycanbedoneawaywith.15–18

OnCT, stageIlesions are characterizedbyreabsorption

ofthe bonetrabeculae and byboneexpansion. Anarea of

attenuationcorrespondingtotheareaofradiolucencyofthe

radiographcanbeseen.StageIIisdemonstratedthroughareas

ofattenuationtogetherwithareasofcalcificationandfatty

necrosis.StageIIIlipomasaretheonesthataremostdifficult

todiagnosebecauseoftheossification,calcification,necrosis

andcystformation.7

UseofMRIfordiagnosingintraosseouslipomasis

impor-tantbecause thedensity oftheselesions issimilartothat

ofsubcutaneoustissue,bothinT1and inT2.MRIonstage

I lesions shows that they have the same density as the

subcutaneous tissue in T1 and shows hyposignal in T2.

IN stage II, areas of hyposignal are shown in the central

regionofT1andT2,whichareconsistentwiththeareasof

calcification.Inaddition,aringofsclerosiscanbeviewed.In

stageIII,athinringoffatcanbeseen,alongwithanareaof

centralcalcificationandawideringofsclerosisthatpresents

hyposignal inT1and T2. Theareas offatty necrosisshow

variablesignalinT1andhypersignalinT2.7

Histologically,thelesionsarecharacterizedbythepresence

ofmaturefattytissueandatrophiedbonetrabeculae.

Differ-entiationbetweenneoplasticandnon-neoplasticadiposecells

isfundamental,althoughcomplicated.Anincreasednumber

ofbloodvesselsmaybeoneoftheindicatorsofmalignity.In

histologicalanalysesonlipomas,itisalsocommontoobserve

mucinousdegenerationand,becauseofthis,microscopicand

macroscopiccystsmayalsobeobserved.6,19

Evenhistologically, itisdifficulttodifferentiatebetween

lipomasandboneinfarctions,butcertaincharacteristicsmay

assistinthis.Ininfarctions,thelackofcalcificationscanbe

highlighted.Inlipomas,diminutionofthetrabecular

struc-tures,expansionofthecorticalboneandpossiblepresenceof

cystscanbehighlighted.15

Regarding treatment of intraosseous lipomas, surgery

is not indicated in most cases of asymptomatic patients.

For symptomatic patients, the tumor can be treated with

curettageandimplantationofabonegraft.5,6Malignant

trans-formationofthetumorisrare,asisrecurrence.5,6,19

Conflicts

of

interest

Theauthorsdeclarenoconflictsofinterest.

r

e

f

e

r

e

n

c

e

s

(5)

2. FochesattoLQ,SchwankeR,KaramFC,SerafiniAO.Lipoma intraósseodocalcâneo:relatodecaso.RevBrasOrtop. 1998;33(1):917–8.

3. VargasCSV,GonzalezC,AtencioE,CellamareO,FuenmayorJ, NietoO.Lipomaintraóseodelcalcâneo.Apropósitodeun casoclínico.AcadBiomDigital.2011;48:987.

4. ÖztekinÖ,ArginM,OktayA,ArkunR.Intraosseouslipoma: radiologicalfindings.RadiolBras.2008;41(2):81–6.

5. MilgramJW.Intraosseouslipomas:radiologicandpathologic manifestations.Radiology.1988;167(1):155–60.

6. MilgramJW.Intraosseouslipomas:aclinicpathologicstudy of66cases.ClinOrthopRelatRes.1988;231:277–301.

7. PropeckT,BullardM,LinJ,DoiK,MartelW.

Radiologic-pathologiccorrelationofintraosseouslipomas. AJRAmJRoentgenol.2000;175(3):673–8.

8. UnniK.Lipomaandliposarcoma.In:UnniK,editor.Dahlin’s bonetumors:generalaspectsanddataon11087cases. Philadelphia:Lippincott-Raven;1996.p.349–53.

9. ChowLT,LeeKC.Intraosseouslipoma.Aclinicpathologic studyofninecases.AmJSurgPathol.1992;16:401–10.

10.BuckleySL,BurkusJK.Intraosseouslipomaoftheilium.A casereport.ClinOrthopRelatRes.1988;(228):297–301.

11.GotoT,KojimaT,IijimaT,YokokuraS,MotoiT,KawanoH, etal.Intraosseouslipoma:aclinicalstudyof12patients.J OrthopSci.2002;7(2):274–80.

12.RehaniB,WissmanR.Multipleintraosseouslipomatosis:a casereport.CasesJ.2009;2:7399.

13.DohlerR,PoserHL,HarmsD,WiedemannHR.Systemic lipomatosisofbone.JBoneJointSurgBr.1982;(6491): 84–7.

14.SauerJM,OzonoffMB.Congenitalboneanomaliesassociated withlipomas.SkeletalRadiol.1985;13(4):276–9.

15.WilliamsCE,ClosePJ,MeaneyJ,RitchieD,CogleyD,CartyAT. Intraosseouslipomas.ClinRadiol.1993;47(5):348–50.

16.GoldmanAB,MarcoveRC,HuvosAG,SmithJ.Casereport280: intraosseouslipomaofthetibia.SkeletalRadiol.

1984;12(3):209–12.

17.OnguruO,Pabuc¸cuY,CelasunB.Intraosseouslipomaofthe fibula.ClinImaging.2002;26(1):55–7.

18.SchatzSG,DipaolaJD,D’AgostinoA,HannaR,QuinnSF. Intraosseouslipomaofthecalcaneus.JFootSurg. 1992;31(4):381–4.

Imagem

Fig. 3 – Bone scintigraphy with technetium, which did not show the lesion (A and B), thus suggesting that it was of benign nature.
Fig. 4 – Magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvis, in which the T1 coronal image showed a lesion with hyposignal, without soft-tissue invasion (A), and in T2 (B) with hypersignal in the right iliac.

Referências

Documentos relacionados

The comparisons of the different positions on the femurs between the three stem models regarding the deformations due to the initial loads indicated that there were

Objective: To evaluate the results and complications from surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome by means of an open route, using a local anesthesia technique comprising use of

Methods: From the sample of the study conducted by our group in 2006, in which we evalu- ated the functional results from arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears, 35

The present study comprised a retrospective evaluation of factors that might influence the surgical results among patients undergoing videoarthroscopic treatment of recurrent

The traditional methods were compared with the plateau- plate angle measurements regarding the proportions of cases of high and low patella, using Fisher’s exact test.. The

2 – Probability of tumor classification in an advanced stage, in relation to the time taken to make the diagnosis. It was seen

In all of these cases, the sensory branch of the superficial fibular nerve was used as a graft donor source.. All the patients were given explanations and signed a state- ment of

Results: The data showed that mesenchymal stromal cells from bone marrow treated for up to 21 days in the presence of bovine tendon extract diluted at diminishing concentra-